precisely

GPT-5.6 is probably the best AI model in the world. And precisely for that reason, the majority does not need it.

by

Yesterday OpenAI publicly released GPT-5.6its new family of AI models with three variants: Sol, the most powerful, Terra, more balanced, and Luna, the most cost-efficient. One idea stood out in that release: that GPT-5.6 is probably the best model in the world. And precisely for that reason, the vast majority will never need it. As part of the launch, he published a nice video in which he showed how a farmer in Japan, an entrepreneurial couple in New York and a mathematician in Poland had used it for their work. Then we go back to the video and those three scenarios. But a preview: two of those three stories demonstrate just the opposite of what OpenAI wanted to demonstrate. In the official announcement OpenAI also told us about how this was the most capable family of AI models they had ever released and they included the traditional huge string of internal benchmark results to prove it. According to internal tests, GPT-5.6 Sol is the best existing AI model both in programming and in the use of agentic tools in the terminal (among many other scenarios). Source: OpenAI. Their data revealed that we are facing what theoretically it is the best AI model in the world currently. And the interesting thing is that independent studies like those of Artificial Analysis They corroborate it: in several of its tests GPT-5.6 even surpassed Fable 5, Anthropic’s frontier model that until now was the great reference in this industry. Source: Artificial Analysis. The model certainly appears to be spectacular. Those responsible for ARC Prize, that benchmark in which most AI models repeatedly crash, commented how GPT-5.6 Sol was still the first frontier model to solve one of the puzzles of their new benchmark, ARC-AGI 3. No other had come close to that milestone, and according to this organization “it is the best model when it comes to orienting yourself in a situation that you have never encountered.” All that these tests validate is the idea that we are facing a prodigious model. And the problem is precisely that: that most users will probably never need it. Too powerful for most of us Let’s go back to the video at the beginning. Of the three use cases mentioned, two are quite trivial. GPT-5.6 helped the Japanese farmer create a remote control system for his greenhouse with a Raspberry Pi. He helped the New York couple build a curious cereal box business. Nothing in those two tasks seems to require the best model in the world. In fact, they are precisely the type of projects that have been being resolved for months with much cheaper models. With the third scenario, that of the Polish mathematician, things change: this academic was trying to solve a conjecture that he had been working on for three years. No previous model had been able to help him, but with GPT-5.6 he managed to reveal a totally new idea, he says. One of his final comments precisely makes it clear who GPT-5.6 Sol is for: “If you have that kind of audacity to try to do something really big, you won’t be scared of the incredible computing power because you can organize it with the model.” That is the key to the issue: most users are not trying to solve mathematical conjectures that are almost impossible to solve. Most we use tools in a much more everyday wayand that is completely logical and reasonable. That’s why there are many more more modest and affordable models, and why the GPT-5.6 Sol, even if it makes sense, will be a very unprofitable model for most people. It is not a model for counting R’sof course. In fact, every time a new model comes into our hands, It is very difficult to appreciate if it is really better than the previous ones because the tasks we propose are usually solved very well with the existing ones. There are cases in which differences are seen—in especially complex programming, for example—but here we are faced with a situation that we have lived before on several occasions. This happens, for example, with modern hardware: very few people need the most advanced processors or an RTX 5090 to play, because more modest CPUs and GPUs give access to a truly fluid experience. We don’t usually need a camera either. Hasselblad of 15,000 euros for our vacations, and a good cell phone of 500-1,000 euros at this point solves the problem wonderfully. The good thing about all this is what also happens with those examples that we mentioned before: what is extraordinarily expensive and powerful today will end up no longer being so because other even better (and probably more expensive) AI models will appear on the horizon. The question is no longer “which model is more “intelligent”?”, but “Which model is smart enough to solve this task at the lowest cost?“. That explains why there are variants like Sol, Terra and Luna. Maybe in two years GPT-5.6 Sol will be the cheap model we use to correct an email or plan a vacation. The recent history of AI invites us to think precisely that: today’s frontier models end up becoming tomorrow’s everyday models. Perhaps that is the true meaning of GPT-5.6. Not that today almost no one needs so much intelligence, but that in a few years we will probably we all take it for granted. In Xataka | OpenAI just launched GPT-Live: ChatGPT voice mode has learned to listen, shut up and respond better

It no longer goes to the Moon, and that is precisely what makes it more important

by

The design of Artemis III has changed a lot with respect to what was initially conceived. To begin with, initially the objective was to carry out the moon landing. Later, the possibility of not landing on the moon was raised, but testing docking with the landing system in lunar orbit. However, this will no longer be the case. It has been decided test everything in low Earth orbit, since the tests can be done just as well there and costs and risks are reduced. However, this is not the only change that has been announced recently about the mission. They are all advantages. The journey to low Earth orbit is easier, but also offers more opportunities. In Artemis III there will be many vehicles involved, since we will not only have the SLS rocket and the Orion ship as in Artemis II. The HLS landing systems of SpaceX and Blue Origin. To travel to the Moon there are very narrow launch windows, while low Earth orbit offers more launch opportunities for all of these vehicles. If it is necessary to postpone a first date, there would not be a long wait. Why so much propulsion? In Artemis I and II, the rocket that propelled the shipthe SLS, had a cryogenic propulsion upper stage, which used cryogenic fuels to give the rocket an extra boost and escape the Earth’s gravitational pull. But this is no longer necessary in Artemis III. They don’t need to escape from Earth, on the contrary. Therefore, this stage has been eliminated in order to save on fuel. Be careful with the gap. You cannot remove a stage from the rocket and leave it as is. The rocket is manufactured with a specific weight and height profile. If a piece is simply removed, some of that weight is lost and it becomes unbalanced. Therefore, this propulsion stage It will be replaced by a structural spacer. That is, a piece that weighs and measures exactly the same, but has no function. NASA has already made great progress in its construction. Nothing is thrown away here. The upper stage that has been removed will be used on Artemis IV, since there we will travel to the Moon and all the possible momentum is needed. For the third phase it will be much easier and cheaper to fly without it. Orion+HLS. The main objective of Artemis III will be to verify that the Orion spacecraft and the SpaceX and Blue Origin HLS can dock properly. Once this docking occurs, some members of the crew would go from Orion to the HLS, to verify that the transition from one vehicle to another can be made and to carry out the relevant tests. More permanence in space. Artemis III astronauts will stay in space longer than Artemis II astronauts. This will allow them to obtain additional data on Orion’s life support systems under prolonged manned conditions. Slowly and with good writing. The Apollo missions were a leap into the void, literally. It was possible to go to the Moon on several occasions, but the risk was very high. During all these years, a more exhaustive study of the Moon has been done to design the best travel conditions. The goal was to return to our satellite, but not at any price. The return journey has already begun, but it is not worth rushing at the last moment. To do this safely and send many more manned missions in the near future, it is important that Artemis III is a safe test. That’s why these NASA design changes are so important. Of course, we cannot forget that NASA is not the only one responsible. SpaceX and Blue Origin must also demonstrate that their vehicles are safe. Time is running out for everyone. Image | POT In Xataka | We have not yet colonized the Moon and we have already filled it with garbage: there are even abandoned golf balls

China says it has built its largest data center. And confirms that your problem is precisely in the chips

by

China has just turned on its new technological pride in Shenzhen: an AI cluster with 14,000 petaflops built entirely with Huawei Ascend 910C chips. the city has presented it as the first scale computing center with 10,000 cards with completely national technology. It is an undeniable milestone, but if we give it context, an alarm signal and a dose of reality. Why is it important. The Shenzhen cluster, with all its rhetoric of technological sovereignty, represents about 1% of the capacity of the largest US data center in operation today. In other words: China has built, with great institutional effort, what OpenAI already had available to train GPT-4 in 2022. The gap is not a question of ambition (China has it) or capital (it also has it) or energy (of course, he also has it). It’s a chip issue. What are they capable of manufacturing and in what volume today. Between the lines. The Shenzhen government statement highlights energy efficiency metrics and occupancy rates of 92%. It’s really good data. But the selection of indicators (the cherry picking) says a lot so it is omitted: there are no direct comparisons with the clusters of NVIDIA H100 that colonize the data centers of Microsoft, Google or Amazon. Posting only what you have is also a way of not publishing what you lack. The context. At this point no one doubts that China does not lack electricity, not even engineersnor money to build large-scale AI infrastructure. What is still missing, despite the advances, are the chips. Export restrictions imposed by Trump They have cut off access to advanced semiconductors from NVIDIA and TSMCand that has forced China to accelerate its own ecosystem. Huawei has responded with the Ascend 910Ca capable chip but that still has performance limitations and, above all, volume production. If wafers were not in short supply, this data center would be a hundred times larger. Yes, but. Can China close that four-year gap before it gets even bigger? The answer depends almost entirely on how much its domestic semiconductor industry manages to scale, and whether or not Western sanctions manage to stifle that process. At the moment, in Shenzhen they are celebrating an achievement as undeniable as it turns out that in the eyes of Silicon Valley they are still in 2022. Featured image | Huawei In Xataka | Memory prices have started to fall in some markets. There is still a long way to go to close the AI ​​crisis

That is precisely why he is going to fire 40% of the staff.

by

Jack Dorsey, founder of Twitter and current CEO of Block (which manages Square, Cash App and Tidal), has just done something that few CEOs dare to do: fire 40% of his employees at once, at a time when is making profits. The most curious thing is that its investors seem to agree with Dorsey’s decision and have celebrated it with a historic rise in the company’s shares. Thus, Block will go from having more than 10,000 workers to just under 6,000. That leaves a balance of more than 4,000 layoffs in a single day. Dorsey does not hide: the official reason is increased productivity What artificial intelligence offers. A 40% cut with benefits. Dorsey communicated his plans to lay off 40% of his staff through a post on Xand justified it as a proactive move, not a response to any financial problem. According to the CEO himself, the company is going through a good economic moment and is marking an upward path in profits. “We did not make this decision because we are in trouble. Our business is solid. Gross profits continue to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers and profitability is improving,” the CEO confirmed in his statement. That is precisely one of the keys that it is marking the latest rounds of layoffs and it makes a big difference in terms of the traditional reasons why companies fired their employees. As its CEO points out, the layoffs are not the result of a financial crisis, but rather are due to the increase (or the promise of that increase). in productivity that AI automation brings. This technology allows do the same with less staff. “We’re already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re building and using, along with smaller, flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working that fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a business. And that’s accelerating rapidly,” Dorsey wrote in his message. Those laid off do not stay stranded. The more than 4,000 employees affected by the unexpected layoff will receive 20 weeks of base salary plus one additional week for each year of seniority in the company. According to collect Business Insideremployees affected by staff cuts They will be able to keep their corporate devices and will be given an additional payment of $5,000. As Dorsey explained, they are aware that, in the short term, the layoffs were going to be irremediable, so instead of progressively reducing their workforce, they have chosen to cut short, avoiding smaller rounds of layoffs that damage the morale and focus of the staff and the trust of clients and shareholders. “I would rather take firm, clear action now and build from a position of belief than manage a slow downsizing toward the same outcome.” Why now and why so many. According what was published by WiredBlock has been applying personnel cuts in different departments for months. The company had already laid off 931 employees in March 2025 and nearly 1,000 more jobs in January 2024. One of the reasons behind these successive layoffs is the correction of overhiring during the pandemic, a correction that caused hundreds of thousands of layoffs among the main technology companies between 2022 and 2024. This is an argument that Dorsey has not deniedbut it does not stand out as the main trigger for layoffs, putting the target on the increase in productivity that AI provides. Block surpassed 12,000 employees in 2022, in a stage of accelerated expansion that now, with AI tools integrated into the workflow, is impossible to justify. Block CFO Amrita Ahuja was quite blunt about it, ensuring that the layoffs will allow the company to move faster “with smaller, highly talented teams that use AI to automate more work.” Investors applaud him. Block shares they were shot more than 24% after the announcement. This is the reflection of a dynamic that is becoming increasingly common in which investors reward with increases in share prices and massive layoffs as a sign of efficiency and modernization. Michael Blank, associate professor of finance at Stanford Business School, explained to Business Insider that this dynamic could unleash a competition between CEOs of large companies to convince investors that their companies are better prepared than their rivals, thus turning massive layoffs into a tool to improve capitalization figures. Block’s stock had been struggling for months before the announcement. According to data collected by Ad Hoc News In February, the stock was trading 21% below its start-of-year price and 37% below its 52-week high. In that context, Dorsey would have managed to kill two birds with one stone: reorganize his company towards a more AI-oriented model and relaunch investor confidence. Doing more with less: the key to layoffs. With his decision, Dorsey has left a message that goes far beyond Block’s management itself, and proposes a change in the relationship between the number of people a company needs to do a job. “It seems inevitable that this will spread to all publicly traded companies. We have to find a way for everyone to be an owner and have some exposure to the benefits, as the number of employees drops dramatically,” said Jessica Verrilli, CEO of the venture investment fund Adverb Ventures. in response to Dorsey’s post. In the presentation of Block’s results, the CEO assured that the increase in AI productivity It inevitably led to staff cuts because fewer hands were needed to do the job. “I don’t think we’re the first to realize this. I think most companies are late,” collected Business Insider. He’s not the only one who thinks so. Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski has been running a similar strategy for years and, in a recent interviewassured that by 2030 his company will be able to do without 30% of the 3,000 employees who currently make up the payment platform’s workforce due to the increase in productivity provided by AI. In Xataka | “The world is in danger”: Anthropic’s security manager leaves the company to write poetry Image … Read more

In 2009 Stephen Hawking hosted “the party of the century.” No one came precisely because Stephen Hawking organized it

by

Bottles of the best French Champagne, tables full of canapés and cucumber sandwiches, balloons, banners and music. Stephen Hawkingthe famous theoretical physicist from the University of Cambridge, had everything ready to give the party of the century in June 2009. “I was waiting for a long time, but no one came,” explained a couple of years later. He wasn’t too surprised, especially since he only sent out the invitations after the party was already over. And not by mistake: Hawking’s party was the first major celebration dedicated specifically to time travelers. In 1992, Hawking had already proposed that time travel was impossible. So that afternoon party in the swamps of the River Cam was half an experiment to prove that the timetravelers They did not exist, half “trolling” all those theorists who thought that this type of trips could exist. In reality, it was a joke that is inserted into the historical controversy of time travel. For all we know, all the time travelers could be in the pub across the street laughing at poor Hawking and his old anti-travel ideas. It is not likely, there I agree with Hawking; but, today, we cannot rule out that working hypothesis. Everything (not) is on the internet I suppose that, therefore, that of the English physicist has not been the only attempt to search for time travelers. A few years later, in 2014, a team of physicists from the Michigan Institute of Technology used the internet and social networks to look for clues about possible trips. It was not about looking for people who defined themselves as “time travelers“, but to look for the trace of clairvoyance. That is, signs of people who knew things before they happened. The idea was to look for unequivocal messages, about things not previously known and significant enough to be recorded in the history books of the future. They chose two facts that met these three characteristics: Comet ISON and the name that Jorge Bergoglio would choose during his papacy, Francisco. The search, needless to say, was fruitless. Only in the case of Pope Francis did they find a prior reference to the choice of the name, but after analyzing it they discovered that it was a merely speculative text. Can you travel in time? The short answer is that we don’t know. The long answer is that, although it seems something banaldebates about the possibility of time travel continue to be a very controversial topic even today. And they remain so for a very simple reason: there is nothing in our scientific theories about the universe that prohibits per se this type of trips. Hence it is an exciting field full of theories, objections and counter-objections. Someday we will have to return to the topic and talk about the current controversies in time travel. But today, since it’s Sunday, I just wanted to remind you that if you ever pass through Cambridge on June 28, 2009, there is a party to which you are invited. Toast us. In Xataka | The most transformative event in modern cosmology is just around the corner, according to these physicists’ hypothesis In Xataka | Stephen Hawking made a prediction about black holes in 1971. A new signal has proven him overwhelmingly right

LG wanted to be different from all the others with its mobile phones. That was precisely what condemned it: Crossover 1×29

by

It’s been more than four years since LG closed its mobile divisiona decision that made financial sense—they kept losing money—but that left some users, including myself, shaken. And it is that LG had its particular golden era in this segment. At the beginning of the 2010s, the company was an absolute benchmark: it was not in vain that Google chose it two years in a row to develop and manufacture the Nexus 4 and Nexus 5. But LG also had, as we say, some fantastic years after launching the LG G2a terminal that seemed almost gigantic to us with its 5.2 inches and that posed an ambitious and notable bet. Especially because among other things it “hid” the physical buttons and placed them behind the screen. He LG G3 It was also going in the right direction, but from there the stumbles and that erratic line of movement began. some terminals that were unpredictable: The firm surprised us every year with different decisions that seemed more intended to attract attention and cause a “wow” effect than to solve real problems. This is what we saw in that synthetic leather back cover of the LG G4 and especially in that modular design of the LG G5 that did not finish curdling. Along the way, other ranges such as the V were left behind and of course their attempts to sell their mid-ranges, which had a very difficult time due to the push of Samsung and Chinese manufacturers. Since then, things continued not to go well with their terminals. LG was still brave and originalbut time and time again the market responded with indifference: the world seemed to want more “boring” mobile phones. Crazy models like the LG Wing ended up condemning a company that ended up surrendering to the evidence to focus on other divisions that are an absolute success, such as the one in charge of develop OLED panels for their TVs but also for various manufacturers such as Apple. On YouTube | Crossover In Xataka | 15 brave LG phones that tried to change the world (and failed)

On this island in Japan there is a traffic light that only turns green once a year, and not precisely to control traffic

by

On the small Japanese island of Himakajima there is a traffic light which remains flashing amber or red all year round. Only during one day in May does it change its usual behavior and activate its green light (or blue, as they insist in Japan). This is not a fault. It was designed this way for a reason that goes beyond traffic control. An educational traffic light. The traffic light was installed in 1994 at the Himakajima East Port intersection, but not to regulate traffic. The island barely has 2,000 inhabitants and few vehicles circulate on its roads. The traffic light exists solely to teach children of the place how the urban signals work before they leave the island for larger cities. One less problem. According to explains the Himaka Road Safety Association, which promoted its installation, minors grew up without real experience with traffic lights. Before, they used small models in traffic safety classes, but the children themselves asked “what does a real traffic light look like?” account Kazuo Sugiura, former president of the association, to the local media Asahi. One day a year to learn. Every May, the traffic light is activated for a full day. Third and fifth grade students from the local school go to the crossing accompanied by teachers, parents and authorities. There they practice how to cross correctly: they wait for the color to change, look both ways and cross the zebra crossing with their arm raised, just as they would in any city in Japan. More difficult than expected. The children also discover that calculating the time they have to cross the pass is not as simple as it seems. “It was complicated because it turned red when I was trying to cross,” explained a third-grade student after practicing with her bicycle. The exercise helps them understand the real times of light change and develop security reflexes that they cannot acquire in their daily life on the island. An unexpected tourist curiosity. This little anecdote has gained notoriety beyond Japan. Every year videos and photos circulate on social networks showing the peculiar educational ritual. Some users even consult the local government website to find out the exact date of “green day” and witness the event, although it varies slightly each season. It is already part of the island’s identity. Once the annual training is completed, the traffic light returns to its flashing lights routine. It does not serve any practical function in traffic control, but it has ended up becoming a small symbol of how the community of this island prepares its children for the urban world. The rest of the year, Himakajima remains a quiet place known for its beaches and octopus dishes, with a traffic light that counts down the days until it can turn green again. Cover image | Google Maps In Xataka | Convenience stores were an emblem of Japan. Until the demographic crisis has revealed the dark side of opening 24 hours

The Earth is headed for a new ice age, according to a Science study. And it is precisely because of global warming

by

Science is largely in agreement when it suggests that the Earth’s temperature it increases more and moreand logic could lead us to think that the world is going to become in a real desert like the one in Almería. But to everyone’s surprise, what can happen is a great ice agethat is, everything ends up covered in ice. And although it may seem illogical, science wanted to give light about this topic. They have been new models from the University of Bremen and the University of California Riverside, published in Sciencewho have located right there one of the great unexpected dangers of terrestrial geochemistry: under certain conditions, excess heat can activate “biological accelerators” that then cool the planet beyond its original state. Even to reach an ice age. Beyond the rocks. Something that may be unknown to many is that the Earth has a temperature control system like the thermostat in our home. The most accepted was regulation by the slow wear of silicate rocks. However, geological records show episodes in which this natural “thermostat” fails: the Earth freezes from pole to pole, as during the Precambrian glaciations. What is missing from the equation? The new study points to the decisive influence of marine biology and nutrient cycles, especially phosphorus and oxygen. An unexpected loop. When CO₂ emissions and global temperatures rise, the arrival of phosphorus into the oceans also increases, fertilizing the proliferation of algae. These remove CO₂ thanks to photosynthesis in the water, and when they die, they transport that carbon to marine sediments, where it can be trapped for millions of years. As if it were a dumping ground for carbon dioxide on the seabed.. But the key to the loop is oxygen: the explosion of algal productivity consumes the oxygen in the water, meaning that almost no living being can live here. Under these conditions, phosphorus stops being buried and instead of being eliminated it is recycled from the sediment. This fuels new “super blooms” and closes a vicious cycle: ‘More nutrients → more algae → less oxygen → more nutrient recycling → extreme cooling’. The result is that the biological thermostat goes crazy, sequestering carbon at a frenetic pace that the rocks’ slow thermostat cannot compensate for. The new model. The new model integrate these quick feedbacksadding sedimentary chemistry, the phosphorus cycle and the oxygenation state to the traditional silicate weathering models. Surprisingly, when predicting the effect of the “great human experiment” of releasing CO₂, he finds that the system does not always smoothly return to the previous statebut it can overcompensate and take the planet to colder times, in deep glaciations, for tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of years.​​ This only occurs when the atmosphere is less rich in oxygen, something common in Earth’s past, which may explain why ice ages coincide with intermediate periods of planetary oxygenation. Today, that same loop would make the “reward” much smoother, although there would still be the risk of long-term cooldown. If we continue burning fossils. In this way, other scientific studies already suggest that large inputs of phosphorus, whether due to massive mining or increased weathering induced by climate change, can increase the risk of anoxia and abrupt cooling events, although this scenario would take centuries or millennia to develop. This is why the acceleration of the phosphorus cycle together with the increase in CO₂ concentrations is conditioning us to the climate changes that we will see in a few million years. And although the Earth system may have the mission of stabilizing, the reality is that this system cannot always be trusted. Images | Denise Schuld In Xataka | We have just identified the oldest glaciers in the world. Where: under South Africa’s big gold mines

A man with paralysis has achieved it precisely thanks to AI

by

Artificial intelligence has come to Being able to improve our day to dayand this is what a team from the University of California wanted Improve the quality of life of people with disabilities. Machine control with the mind. Something that a priori can be taken from a science fiction film, but that neurotechnology laboratories want to lead to reality. The problem is that precision and accessibility remain a real challenge for all engineers. In this way, the Cerebro-Order interfaces (BCI) right now they require very complex surgery for Be able to install electrodes in the brain To achieve great precision. But now this will change, According to a study Published in the prestigious magazine Nature Machine Intelligence which presents an advance that could change the rules of the game: an AI that acts as ‘co -pilot’ of a non -invasive BCI that improves its performance. A team that has already been tested. The system, developed by Jonathan Kao’s team at the University of California, has allowed a man with partial paralysis to control a robotic arm to perform complex tasks, something he could not do with conventional BCI technology. A co -pilot of AI to read the mind. Non -invasive BCIs, which are placed on the scalp to capture the electrical signals of the brain, are safer and more accessible, but also less precise. The “noise” and the weakness of the signals make it difficult for the system to decipher the user’s intentions exactly. This is where artificial intelligence enters. Instead of trying to decode each nuance of brain activity, Kao’s system Use an AI that collaborates with the user. And this is how Kao himself explains to Nature: These co -pilots are essentially collaborating with the user of the BCI and trying to infer the objectives you want to achieve, and then help complete those actions. In this way, artificial intelligence learns to integrate the intention of the user himself, needing less direct brain information to execute a precise command. This creates a shared autonomy system, between the human and the machine itself. Results that speak for themselves. To test this system, the researchers conducted two key experiments. First, they asked four participants (one of them with paralysis) to move a cursor on a screen to a goal. With the traditional BCI they were achieved most of the time. However, by activating the co -pilot of AI, they all completed the fastest task and with a much greater success rate, improving the performance up to four times. The fire test. This was done with a real robotic arm. The task was to take colored blocks and move them to specific points on a table. The participant with paralysis could not complete the task using the non -invasive BCI alone. However, after activating the AI, its success rate shot up to an amazing 93%. Participants without paralysis were also remarkably faster with the help of AI. A view to the future. This approach opens a promising door to improve the quality of life of people with motor disabilities, offering a powerful tool without going through the operating room. Zhengwu Liu, an engineer from Hong Kong University who did not participate in the study, qualifies the idea as “a good way to achieve a more powerful man-machine hybrid system.” There is an ethical challenge. The advance is not free of controversies, and as the neurologist Mark Cook of the University of Melbourne points, it is necessary that the shared autonomy does not occur “at the expense of the user’s autonomy”, since “there is a risk that the interventions of the AI ​​annul or misunderstand the intention of the user.” Kao himself recognizes this challenge. In fact, he reveals that the participants in the study did not like the versions of the system in which the AI ​​had too much control, such as when he could decide the trajectory of the robotic arm itself. Finding that right point where the AI ​​assists without dominating will be key to the future of this technology, which promises to continue evolving with more sophisticated co -drivers and, even, its possible integration into the BCIs surgically implanted. Images | Ubidium Beach In Xataka | Hong Kong faces a huge public health crisis by the Chikungunya virus. Its solution: an army of robot dogs

Jordi Wild has the most controversial podcast in Spain. And precisely that is what waves have rewarded

by

Jordi Wild, one of the undisputed stars of the podcastfera in Spanish, has won a wave In recognition of his career. Of course, Wild is not the first successful podcaster, born completely in the Internet sphere, self -produced outside the radio tradition, which wins the prize. But it is the first that has taken as references to iconic Anglo -Saxon names of the environment and has adapted them to its own style and very well, controversies included. Therefore, that waves is more than recognition of unquestionable success: it is also corroboration by the STABLISHMENT of the radio of one of the most peculiar personalities of the environment. Jordi Wild’s meteoric ascent. The YouTuber and Podcasts created its YouTube channel ‘in 2013The Rincón de Giorgio‘, which initially focused on a derivative and usual content by the time: gameplaysreaction and parodies videos. Soon he began to enter other issues, such as current debates and issues related to criminal psychology. In 2020 He started his podcast ‘The Wild Project‘. Although it is a bit complicated to calibrate its reach, On YouTube It approaches the 7 million subscribers, more almost 90,000 in podimo. His possible millions of listeners make him one of the most influential and followed podcasts in Spanish. Joe Rogan’s shadow. Jordi Wild has several times that One of its greatest influences To create and develop The Wild Project is Joe Rogan and his podcast ‘The Joe Rogan Experience‘. It was he who inspired him in the search for a format of long, deep interviews and without censorshipwhere the guest is the protagonist and all kinds of topics are addressed, not necessarily linked to its knowledge area. Other influences that Wild has cited in its programs, notoriously always American, are Howard Stern, David Letterman or Johnny Carson, of which he values his ability to face all kinds of guests. Podcasts in the waves. Since 2016 the podcasts have a presence in the waves, the awards to the media, programs and those responsible that since 1954 delivers the SER. That year The award for the best program, radio or radio online broadcast platform was given to Podium Podcast (hurry owned). Since then, programs such as ‘Xrey’, ‘Weekly deform’, ‘stretching the gum’, ‘Titania’ or ‘La Ruina’ this year have been awarded. But in addition, podcasts began to be specifically rewarded in Podcast Global Wave Wave Awards From 2022, an initiative in collaboration with Spotify to recognize and give visibility to the podcast industry in Spanish. The first delivery gala was held in May 2022 in Malaga. It is in this context that Jordi Wild has received a Special Recognition Prize for his career. Opening of sights. In this way, the waves open the door to a completely Anglo -Saxon style of influence, without equivalents in Spain at the level of success and scope, and that distances themselves from the winners so far, which enter into fields (audioficctions, humor and conversational, sound trials) that have always been present on the radio. The in -depth and uncensored interview style that Wild represents is Pure Podcasta land where There are no time limits and the programs They do not have thematic clippers and of format that does have traditional radio. The bleaching of Giorgio. But Jordi Wild’s program is not devoid of controversy, and has received abundant criticism, especially for the freedom of expression he presumes, and that has earned him criticism of both conservative and progressive sectors. He has been accused of giving voice to characters of controversial ideologies, which has generated debates about whether your whitish space extreme right speeches or spread Fake News under the appearance of open debate. Wild has always defended his decision to invite people of all ideologies and reject any attempt of external censorship or pressure. Some of his guests have given him controversies who have had a deep impact on his image, as was the Presence of former Villarejo Commissioner or the recent presence of A lifeguard Tiktoker which presumed to attract bathers to dangerous areas to get the hero. What waves wants. And this controversial image is the one that waves have rewarded, because it is what is most distant from the traditional radio. The search for the cut that is viralized in networks is what distance to programs such as The Wild Project of traditional radio, and it is what makes this prize especially relevant: the waves give visibility to a typology of podcast that until now had not had official recognition for being especially controversial and controversial. Podcast awards. In general, the prizes of the mainstream (In any field of creation) to their representatives less pigeonholed by traditional formats they usually reach the wrong (that’s why Jordi Wild receives an award for his career: he has been working for years: his style has been working for years). But they are always a sign that something moves within the traditional mass media: we cannot expect them to recognize the avant -garde, but it is still a warning that at least they are looking in the same direction as the public and the creators who carry the lead. Header | Chain ser In Xataka | The great surprise of the Pódcast is not that people are listening to them. Is that he is seeing them

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.