pay

Elon Musk made his nth promise on autonomous driving and Tesla will pay him expensive (already stockings)

by

If something has characterized the direction of Elon Musk in front of Tesla, they have been his grandiloquent phrases and his promises of doubtful credibility. One of them is a classic that can now cost Caro: all its cars can be updated to their most advanced autonomous driving system for free. Musk already admits that they will have to take a hard cost. A key business. Autonomous driving is, for Tesla, one of its key businesses for the future. The company already said in 2023 that it could make money exclusively with the software of its cars and that they could make their cars profitable without winning a single euro with the vehicle itself. Since then, Elon Musk has been selling the benefits of its autonomous driving systems. Similarly, the company has been sliding that it is In conversations with third parties to act as suppliers of your driving aid systems. And to this we must add the promise that from next year we will see the Tesla Robotaxis in the streets. The FSD. That autonomous driving has a name and surname within Tesla. Full Self Driving (FSD). A driving aid system that, for the moment, continues to force the driver to be at all times aware of what happens around him in case he has to intervene. The name has been a reason for controversy, DECEÑIOUS ADVERTISING FACKING Because he implies that he has more capacities than he really offers. In fact, Ford with Bluecruisewhich allows you to remove your hands from the steering wheel although keeping your attention, and Mercedes, which does not force you to maintain attention In very specific circumstancesThey seem to have come further. In the specific case of Tesla, their cars are sold with Three well -differentiated packages. Basic assists includes adaptive cruise control and lane change. The improved autopilot package adds functions such as automatic lane or parking (and exit) without human intervention. Finally, the FSD or “Total Autonomous Driving”, as Tesla sells in Spain, adds the stops and torn in the traffic lights and, “in the future, self -admitted in urban areas. The eternal promise. The FSD has been one of Tesla’s great promises in recent years. The price of buying a car with active FSD or “total autonomous driving”, as sold in Spain, adds 7,500 euros to the price of the car. Another option is to activate it in the coming years when we consider it appropriate from our website. That future option is what seems to be complicating Tesla. On its website the following is read in the frequently asked questions section: As of April 2019, all new Tesla vehicles come standard with the autopilot*, which includes cruise control adapted to traffic and autogyro. Some exceptions can be applied. For vehicles without the autopilot software, but equipped with the necessary hardware, you can buy the autopilot, the improved autopilot or the total autonomous driving capacity at any time through its Tesla account; The necessary autopilot software will be added to your car.A necessary update . Since 2016, Tesla has been promising that all their cars would have the necessary hardware to support the functions of total autonomous driving, including those of“Level 5” . That is, the car can move without human intervention, as if it were a robotaxi. In 2019, however, the company had to confirm that the autonomous driving system would require greater computer power. SoThey presented the HW3 a computer designed to allow these functions. Given the promise that cars sold since 2016 could have these functions, cars already sold for free to interested drivers were updated. In 2023, again Tesla has to expand the computer capabilities of its cars with a new hardware. The long -awaited HW4 arrives That now, yes (it is supposed) it will allow a completely autonomous driving. But from the company the message is launched that drivers whose cars use the HW3 should not worry because the new software will refine to make it compatible with their vehicles.They are not valid . A year later, in October 2024, Elon Musk begins to slide the idea that cars with HW3 will not be able to count on the latest advances in autonomous driving and, therefore, they will not be able to enjoy their FSD program. We are not 100% safe. HW4 has HW3’s capacity several times. It is easier to make things work in HW4 and a lot of effort is needed to put that in HW3. There is the possibility that HW3 does not reach the level of security that allows non -supervised FSD. Words pick them upElectrek where, in addition, they explain the difficulties that the company would have to update its cars at the technical level. According to the medium, it is almost impossible due to the limitations of the hardware The Tesla Model and should be the change of paradigm in Europe. It has been destroyed as a best selling car by Dacia SanderoFree . At that time, Elon Musk already warned that if the company did not find a way to make the HW3 compatible with the total autonomous driving would launch a free update campaign of the hardware of the vehicle for all those who had acquired the car with these functions. Months after these first statements, Elon Musk has confirmed that all cars that were bought with the FSD package already active will be updated for free. “We will have to replace all HW3 computers in vehicles where FSD was bought,” Musk said At the last meeting with shareholders.Half fulfilling . In his statements, Musk made it clear that they would only be the cars that acquired the FSD package when buying it the cars that will receive this update for free. This leaves out, therefore, those who did not do first and chose to subscribe to the functions of driving aid. Therefore, Tesla would be halfway. In their day they promised that all cars bought from 2016 would be completely autonomous. This is only possible, … Read more

launches pay payments for credit customers in Spain

by

In its mission of consolidating itself as an increasingly solid alternative to traditional banking, Revolution Continue to incorporate new features. Began ensuring deposit protection, He continued to eliminate the Lithuanian And he took another step by integrating Bizum. Now, the British Neobanco has decided to offer the Payment to your clients in Spain. It is an initiative that will allow to acquire products and pay them in installments. The service will be available for purchases of 50 euros or more for customer credit card customers. Payments can be divided into 3, 6, 9 or 12 months, with a nominal interest rate (TIN) of 14.93%, lower than the ‘revolving’ model of the revolution itself, which is 21.94%. How does Revolution’s installments work? To understand how Revolution’s payment operates, we must first clarify what it is not. It is not ‘revolving’Nor ‘Buy now, pay later.’ In the first case, the user decides at the end of the month if he wants to fraction the purchases made with his credit card in small periodic installments, which makes it a practical option for some scenarios. In the second case, with ‘Buy now, pay later’, the decision is made at the time of purchase: a first disbursement is made and the rest is paid in several equal installments during the following weeks or months. For example, if we make a 100 purchase and decided to segment it in four payments, at the time of the operation we will pay the first 25 euros. And Revolution’s payment payment? Here is different: it can be decided Before closing the monthly cycle of the card if the payment of one or more products that we have acquired is divided. This means that Revolution’s customers now have three card payment options: pay all expenses at the end of the month, use ‘revolving’ or the new payment payment. Neobancos are a reality in Spain. They have been trying to conquer traditional banking customers with a modern design, variety of cards, interesting proposals and greater agility. Revolution is one of the best known neobans, but it is not the only one. We also find options such as N26, Nickel or Trade Republic. Images | Revolution In Xataka | Revolution does not have enough to become a bank. It also wants to be a social network to sell advertising

Our rivers have been contaminated with medications for years. The EU has a solution: let the pharmaceutical companies pay

by

When we read that one of the great environmental challenges of our time is the state of our rivers, our imagination travels directly to the fecal waterindustrial pollution or, lately, microplastics. In what we don’t usually think It’s in the medications. But the problem is real and the European Union is determined to solve it. How can medications ‘contaminate’? Drugs (whether for medical or veterinary use) have a very long life after consumption. And, inevitably, a good part of the medications end up being expelled from the body and entering wastewater. From there, despite the efforts of treatment systems, they reach rivers, lakes and seas. An increasingly solid scientific consensus. Although it is difficult to get a complete idea of ​​the impact of this type of pollution on the environment, the investigations that are appearing They make it clear that it is very far from being an anecdote. In fact, at least 631 pharmaceutical substances (human or veterinary) have been found in more than 71 countries on five continents. Many of them, at levels higher than those considered safe. In 2022, the CSIC analyzed 258 rivers and, after cataloging the Manzanares River as “the most contaminated by drugs in Europe”, warned that we were in the face of “a global threat to the environment and human health.” “Global threat (…) to human health”? Are we not exaggerating? In the case of antibiotics, to use an example we are all familiar with, this is clearly seen. We have been warning for years that the abuse of these medications leads to the emergence of multiresistant bacteria. That’s true on the consumption part, yes; but also in the part in which enormous quantities of them are dumped into nature every year (with the problems that this causes for ecosystems and the risks that it poses). Why is this news now? Because the European Union wants to take action on the matter and, as Oriol Güell explainsis introducing a whole new battery of measures in the renewed Directive on Urban Wastewater Treatment. The goal is to “reduce the compounds discharged into the environment by more than 80%”; the environment, the introduction of a whole series of “quaternary treatments” (ozone, activated carbon, new membranes, etc…) in the treatment systems. The problem? that the EU wants them to pay the affected industries: above all, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. An idea that the sector has not liked. As expected, the application of the “polluter pays” principle in these terms has not pleased the sectors involved. Above all, because of the costs. According to the employers’ associations of both sectors, the application of the European directive would lead to an increase of about 500 million euros in Spain alone. And, beyond the expected conflicts between companies and administration, it is true that the movement is paradoxical. Not because it is not reasonable to charge the costs of water treatment to those who produce them; but because just a couple of years ago, Europe announced its intention to bet on having drug factories on the continent (and thus reduce its dependence on international supply lines). Towards a culture of responsible drug use. Be that as it may, in the end we always return to the same thing: the drug industry is heading straight into a very complex crisis in which health, economic, environmental and cultural issues intermingle so as not to lead us to a dead end. One in which we risk our health, the future and our lives. Image | manuel mv | Joshua Goge In Xataka | The Ozempic boom is so big that US pharmacies have decided to do something unusual: start manufacturing it themselves

pay people to get married

by

According to demographers one of the main factors What is behind the drop in birth rates around the world is that people are not getting married. And yes, I am aware. I can also think of a lot of counterarguments, but the truth is that “marriage and fertility move together with extraordinary regularity“. And, being so, some demographers saywhy don’t we pay people to get married? Pay people to get married? The idea may seem crazy, but it is based on a rather curious issue: that men’s income predict the number of marriages. That is, in places where men earn more, there are more marriages. This is not an extremely strong correlation, but it is very clear (and, as soon as we correct it, it gains strength). The question is why. And is the marriage market actually an insurance market? As? As it sounds. From a sociodemographic point of viewhusbands are a kind of insurance policy. It doesn’t mean that people get married. only for money: but what marriage has traditionally been a widespread solution to the problems and disruptions of having children. A process in which, it goes without saying, women run more risks (health risks, yes; but also work, social and economic risks) than men. put up with a husband (someone who can “reduce” the impact of possible problems that arise) is in a way like paying for insurance: we do it with greater or lesser pleasure in the hope of having it if we need it in the future. Men are many more things, of course.. However, as Lyman Stone points outsalary is usually a pretty good ‘proxy’ for many positive people skills. And, in fact, it works like this even if we are not fully aware of it. It’s something that culturally seeps into our judgments about others. But what happens if insurance covers us less and less? That is the central question: if we look at the US data, we can see that “American incomes are increasing, but this increase is concentrated entirely in women and/or people over 40 years of age, not by young” men. In fact, “men’s real incomes showed no growth or even a decline at almost all ages below 35 years.” As insurance coverage decreases (men can contribute less and less) and monthly payments remain the same (because, well, in the last 20 years the nature of marriages has not changed much), taking out the policy (getting married) It is becoming less and less attractive. It seems silly… but as Lyman Stone saysthe casual effect is there. “When women win the lottery, there is little to no effect on their marriage rates. But when men win the lottery, they get married . Seriously, they (buy houses and) they get married“. It is not the only factorof course: but it is surprisingly important. And surprisingly easy to fix. Because marriage benefits work. Above all, they work much better than maternity benefits work. Image | Photo Pettine | Stock Birken In Xataka | The demographic crisis in the West is no accident: most people do not have children simply because they do not want to.

Netflix increases its prices: this you must pay now

by

Bad news for subscribers Netflix: the platform streaming announced a price increase in each of its subscription plans. Although it is not a dramatic increase, now you will have to pay a little more to continue enjoying the catalog of movies and series. The company argued that the increase is due to a significant increase in the number of subscribers, obtaining 19 million new users in the last quarter of 2024. What you should pay now for your Netflix subscription Through its official website, in the plans and prices sectionNetflix detailed the price of each package and the content it offers. These are the new costs: Standard with ads: $7.99/month With all mobile games and most series and movies available. Unavailable titles are displayed with a lock icon. Likewise, you can watch simultaneously on two compatible devices and download content. Standard without ads: $17.99 per month Offers unlimited movies, shows and games, without advertising. You also have the option to log in on two devices simultaneously and add an extra member who is away from home for $8.99 (no ads) Premium or top quality: $24.99 The difference with the previous plan is that the premium version allows you to log in on up to four devices simultaneously, in addition to 4K resolution available and the possibility of downloading on six devices. Additionally, you can add two members who don’t live at home for $8.99 (no ads). Netflix clarified that the “basic plan” has been discontinuedso any user who paid for this plan must move to the new ones to continue enjoying the content. The platform of streaming He detailed that the massive increase in his subscribers, which entails the increase in prices, was thanks to three events that drew powerful attention: the boxing match between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul, the NFL Christmas games and the premiere of the second season of the “Squid Game”.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.