Apple will launch a MacBook Pro with a touch screen in 2026, according to Ming Chi Kuo. We believe to know why they have changed their minds

After thirteen years, refusing flatly, Apple has begun to prepare its first MacBook with a touch screen, according to the leaks that arrive from two fronts: Ming-Chi Kuo He has announced now That the MacBook Pro with OLED screen will arrive at the end of 2026, and will do so with tactile capabilities. Mark Gurman had already anticipated this possibility in Bloomberg Two years ago, although lacking the level of detail that Kuo has given. Why is it important. This change involves the admission that users’ expectations have changed and that Apple is willing to abandon one of its most entrenched dogmas to stay competitive. And above all: for the generational advance. The figures. Kuo has spoken: the MacBook Pro with OLED screen will begin its mass production at the end of 2026, incorporating a tactile screen with technology ON-CELL. This technology integrates tactile sensors directly into the upper panel layer, without the need for a separate touch layer. Gurman had initially speculated with a launch in 2025, but everything indicates that this schedule has moved to 2026, coinciding with the arrival of the OLED screens. It is not clear if the commercialization will also be at the end of 2026, or if the production will begin on that date, so the commercial arrival would be in 2027. The context. The decision does not arise in a vacuum. Apple is at a particular moment in its history: The MAC now generates more income than the iPad, becoming a more profitable business than expected. Meanwhile, the competition has integrated touch screens for years, setting a market expectation that Apple has ignored again and again. Apple has also been preparing the technological land: Since 2018 it began to unify applications between iPad and Mac. In 2020 it allowed iPhone applications to work in their MAC. Also in 2020 it premiered a more appropriate interface for tactile panels with macOS Big Sur. And in 2025, Macos 26 even more uniform interfaces of operating systems. All this has highlighted how strange it is to use an application designed for touch screen on a device that does not admit it. The turn. Steve Jobs was categorical about touch screens on computers: “Tactile surfaces do not want to be vertical,” He said in 2010. “After a prolonged period, your arm wants to fall.” Tim Cook maintained this position for years, comparing in 2012 the combination of tablets and portables with “combine a toaster with a fridge“ Now Apple is about to do exactly that. Between the lines. Jobs’s ergonomic argument was foundation, but the solution is in the complementary use, not on the total prohibition. Tactile tactile screens are not designed to be the primary interaction method, but an occasional complement to trackpad and keyboard to make Scrollpinch or interact with specific elements. On the other hand, at this point there is an entire generation that has grown with touch screens everywhere. For them it is unnatural to meet a screen without that capacity. Yes, but. Apple will gain competitiveness by eliminating frequent criticism and improve coherence between its devices. But it will also lose that clear distinction between products that defended so much. The MAC will be less unique and more complex conceptually. Deepen. If the 2026 Macbook Pro includes touch screen, it is reasonable to expect Apple to update macos to optimize the experience. This could translate into larger interface elements, specific gestures and an even greater convergence with ipados. The question about compatibility with Apple Pencilwhich would be important for creative professionals. The MacBook with a 2026 touch screen will mark the end of an era of conceptual purity in Apple, but also the beginning of an era of greater flexibility. It is not necessarily better or worse, it is different. And after thirteen years of refusing, Apple finally admits that the user sometimes knows what he wants. In Xataka | Outstanding image | Joshua ng

This is how China is convincing their best minds to leave the USA

Song Chun-Zhu is one of the most prominent authorities in the field of artificial intelligence. After almost three decades developing in the United States, in 2020 Zhu returned to China. It is one of the most notorious cases, but it is not the only one. China has been offering better conditions and more resources with one goal: to recover its best minds to lead the technological career. What’s happening. At the end of the 80s, with the promise of better working conditions and more resources a lot of Chinese talent emigrated to the United States. It was the case of the aforementioned Song Chun-Zhu or Liu Jun, who became one of the most prominent statesmen in the United States. Both They have returned to China And they are the example that the trend that began decades ago is reversing. Why it is important. China is the largest engineers in the world And this has become a key factor in the AI ​​era. It is estimated that at least 38% of the United States’s experts are Chinese and have studied in China. A recent example we have in The new Zuckerberg Superintelligence team, where almost all are Chinese. That a talent escape (rather return) from the United States to China could occur could tip the balance of leadership in AI. Surveillance and tensions. In 2018, the United States promoted the ‘China Initiative’whose objective was to combat economic espionage by the Chinese government. This affected the work of many Chinese scientists, increasing by 75% the number of academics who decided to return to their native country in 2021. On the other hand, the growing tensions between the United States and China, added to The cuts Under Trump’s second mandate they have made the weather anymore. China takes advantage. There is another key reason and that is that the Chinese government is offering very juicy incentives so that the best minds return to their land. They tell the Guardian, that Zhu was offered “resources he could never get in the United States.” It is similar to the case of the Brainco Neurotecnology Startup. It was founded in Boston by Han Biceng and currently has its headquarters in Hangzhou; He returned for the incentives offered by the government. More facilities. This summer, the Chinese government announced a New visa aimed at young technology and science specialists. This visa offers more advantages as more entries, period of validity and longer stay. They can opt for children under 45 who have STEM studies and researchers. With this, the government seeks not only to recover the talent that went abroad, but to attract foreign talent itself. Cover image | Song Chun-Zhu, Gary Lerude In Xataka | There is a city in China that is measured face to face with Silicon Valley: welcome to Hangzhou, the house of the ‘Six Little Dragons’

A video game is recruiting the brightest minds of Russia for war. The problem is that they still go to school

Russia gave a blow this week revealing a video of a few minutes. In it, the interior of what they have called as “the largest secret factory of combat drones on the planet”, located at some point in Alabuga, in the Tartaristan region, was prisoned. The piece showed us a huge army of drones with their workers assembling the pieces. However, there was something else: most were not adults, They were teenagers. A video game and a war. History is part of an investigation and exclusive to Russian media in exile The Insider. Apparently, since the summer of 2022, under the appearance of an educational and entertainment platform called Berloga (“Bear Dirridge”), Russia has been recruiting hundreds of thousands of schoolchildren in a progressive technical-military training system focused on the development and use of drones, camouflaged after video gamescompetitions and programs with academic incentives. The game, approved Personally by Putin And symbolically presented in the busy city of Sebastopol, introduces children into a children’s narrative in which “smart bears” They defend The vital resource of “bees” insects, a barely concealed allegory where bears are Russia and Ukrainian bees. From the first levels of the game to participation in face -to -face competitions and the physical assembly of drones, children are guided along a route designed to transform them In technicians and operators useful for the Russian military complex, all while assures them that “they should not say that it is for war.” From command to the welder. Berloga is not an isolated initiative, but the entrance door to a broader educational network built by the so -called agency for Kremlin strategic initiatives, in which They converge NTI Technology Clubs, the TALANT student achievement monitoring platform and the national archipelago intensive. These programs are connected to each other through competitions As great challengesin which thousands of students work in solutions to “technological” problems (which often have undercover military purposes) proposed by companies associated with the Russian State. Screen capture of the concept of a superpesado launch vehicle with a water -based launch system from the “Large Challenges” program Privileged minds to war. He counted the medium That the students who stand out are rewarded with extra points in the national exam, presidential scholarships and direct entries in companies in the defense sector, such as Geoscan, Yakovlev or Almaz-Agent. The tasks presented to them range from the Improvement of the navigationN from UAVS to the design of unmanned vehicles launched from floating platforms, through automated drone detection systems and laser loaders for tactical use. Although J is requiredUstify the projects As if they were for civil use, the students themselves admit That it is a formality: the real objective is military. Children engineers. Adolescents who participate in these training skills and networks not only program or design prototypes, but some (related to research for themselves) They train soldiersthey set up FPV drones and work to undercover military laboratories in exchange for contracts by work with the consent of their parents. The components they use in the contests are the same as they then use in the operational versions of their creations. In other words, knowledge flows directly to the front. Dual technology. In one of the cases, a young man named Stas developed a kamikaze drone low cost to replace current models of the Russian army whose price exceeds $ 10,000 per unit. Another, Vladislav, collaborated with a state company for Test war teams electronics about its own air platform. Companies, Like Geoscan or Yakovlev, segment their operations between civil and military branches, a common practice that allows maintaining the legality facade against international sanctions. This structure of “dual technologies” is held by officials such as Vice Minister of Commerce Vasili Shpak, who argues that there is no longer a clear distinction Between the civil and the military. The official narrative line points to a future in which all technological innovation will be automatically usable for the war conflict. A photo of the Official Telegram Channel of Zarnitssa 2.0 Child Military Training Child involvement in these programs goes beyond technical learning. Here it seems Intensive archipelagowhich in its beginnings covered various sectors, and has been reconverted in an almost exclusively drone course. Includes exercises like Recognition, electronic evasion, drone launch from land stations or search for objectives with thermal cameras. In parallel, Berloga allied in 2024 with Zarnitssa 2.0the modern version of a Soviet military game. The program, financed with millions From rubles of the state budget, he has trained tens of thousands of schoolchildren between the ages of 7 and 21 In the use of weapons Compressed air, Wannera-47 rifles massers, drones flight and choice of military specialties such as Zapador, UAV operator or political instructor. Discrepancies. Some schools are They have complained that both students and teachers have been forced to participate. Zarnitsa It is managed For the Yunarmiya Youth Movement (Young Army), linked to the Ministry of Defense and that in 2025 will receive More than one billion of rubles in subsidies. For the Russian authorities, the objective It seems clear: Detect military talent from an early age and channel it to the defense industry. War pedagogy. There is much more, since research emphasizes that this mass and silent recruitment of minors for war purposes is being institutionalized with Explicit support of the Kremlin. Putin has ordered drone competitions for children since the age of 7, and new school subjects Centering national security include training with UAVs. The official goal is to achieve “technological sovereignty” by 2030, and today’s adolescents are expected to become the military operators of tomorrow. Officials such as the Deputy Minister of Education Dmitry Afanasyev defend The formation of children in military technology under the pretext that “there are no purely civil applications.” In His wordseven a agricultural drone operator You must have combat competitions, as in China. Thus, Russia is institutionalizing a war pedagogy where the child ceases to be a citizen in training and becomes an anticipated military resource. Rights of the … Read more

Byd has shown us that the 400 kilometers load in five minutes is very real. And they have managed to change their minds

Designed for heavy but practical transport for the daily car. And an advance that has raised some controversy in the battle that China-Occident in the battle for the electric car. It is the 1 MW charger of byd. The same one that, they promise, can load 400 kilometers of autonomy in five minutes and with which, in the words of Stella Li (vice president of the company) equals “the experience of Fill a deposit of gasoline “. It is definitely one of the advances in the electric car that has raised the most interest in recent months. And in Xataka we have tried it. Yes, it is very real In a concessionaire and next to other lesser power chargers. Byd has shown us the operation and recharge of its 1,000 kW or 1 MW charger. An experience that promises to match the times of gasoline but that, they assure from the company, is not primarily thought for cars. Last March, Byd hit the table showing your most powerful loaders to date. Immediately, domino’s chips fell and we knew that Catl and Huawei also confirmed that had ready their own ultra -grape load suppliers. The race for the electric car in China advances at a devilish pace that has taken us at the end of this June, just over two months later from the announcement, to see these loaders in operation. The expansion of the more than 4,000 points that the brand aspires to have very soon in its country clashes frontally with the slowness in Spanish facilities. Be that as it is, the truth is that two byd cars can now recharge in this type of facilities. They are the byd and tang l, two electric mounted on their super e-platform that can assume the power of its megawatt flash charger, a load point known as the 1,000-1,000-1,000: 1,000 kW, 1,000 amps and 1,000 volts. A BYD TANG L at the 1MW load station And that’s what we saw. First with a Byd Tang L and, later, with a Byd have l, the company showed us the system load capacity. For this it is necessary to plug the two hoses that leave the supplier. The car, like a Porsche Macan, has two load shots (one on each side) and plug at the same time. Once the two shots are connected, the load begins from the vehicle. And magic happens. In two minutes, 7% battery capacity has passed to almost 40% of it. One is hypnotized When you see on the central screen the 1,000 kW of load power and the percentage of the battery upload. The maximum peak does not last too much. But that is not too much problem. After 20%, the power falls to 750 kW and it remains so until 30%. It is not then that it is maintained with sufficiency in 700 kW or slightly below. Thus it will come with hardly any drop to 80%. At that pace, moving from a brief 7% to 80% autonomy leads to, just over five minutes. And that 80%, In a car with 83.2 kWh Battery are about 67 kWh available. To lower the data to the ground, two questions. Is it a lot of power? It is a lot of power. It is a barbarity. To get an idea, the most powerful load points that are in Spain Sinde 350 kW and begin to consider loads of 500 kW. Have a car that carries, when the power drops, at 700 kW is to fold the most advanced vehicles at the moment, from the Porsche Taycan and Audi GT e-tron to the KIA EV6 and Hyundai ioniq 5. Just a handful get these figures in Europe. Really load 400 kilometers in five minutes? Yes and no. We explain ourselves. The 67 kWh that would have available any of these two cars with 80% load equals just under 350 real kilometers with a consumption of 20 kWh/100 kilometers. If you talk about 400 kilometers in five minutes it is because the Chinese homologation system is much more lax than WLTP. This has led us to receive news from China from cars with 1,000 kilometers of autonomy that would not support an exam in Europe. Despite this, we must not crucify how to measure in the Asian country. You have to take into account the peculiarities of each market. The homologations are assumed, both the Chinese and the European WLTP try to simulate the use that an average driver would give it. That in China, where the car is used as a ciudad already low speed (also in the ringms) it is much more likely that the average consumption is lower than for a European driver. It is something that have confirmed different Chinese brands: the car is for urban use, for the long trips bullet trains and airplanes are used. Is it really practical? When Byd gave the news, the competitors soon answered. As we have seen, Catl and Huawei came out to point out that they also had similar widths for imminent expansion. From Europe the message was another: That loading power is useless. That was what they pointed out in Mercedes. An opinion that can be controversial and shared before going to China. Now, I thought things better. What they maintain in Mercedes is that so much power is not necessary because, generally, when we stop we are standing for more than five minutes. And it doesn’t matter if we are going to have coffee or, simply, fill the car deposit. In the latter we spend more time of five minutes. If we are barely stopped 10 minutes, it recharges it with a car that can fill its batteries at 350 kW of power does not change much with respect to Byd’s proposal. And, if this power is supported, in just 10 minutes almost 60 kWh capacity will have been filled. That is, 300 kilometers with the previous calculations. In practice, the difference is not much. A … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.