Select the model to use between Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, Grok or Sonar

Let’s tell you how you can choose the artificial intelligence model What are you going to use with? Perplexity in a prompt. This is a chatbot known for allowing you to access many cutting-edge models from third-party companies, something it does automatically depending on the request you make. However, if you are going to use Perplexity, it is advisable to know one of its functions basic, being able to choose by hand which model you want to use. And yes, every time Google, Anthropic or OpenAI launch a new model of artificial intelligenceat Perplexity they are going to add it to their catalog. The results will not be exactly the same as if you use the paid versions of ChatGPT, Grok, Claude or Gemini, because Perplexity may modify them a little. However, you will be able to take advantage of the reasoning power of these models. Choose the AI ​​model to use in Perplexity To choose the AI ​​you want to use in Perplexity, you have to look at the box where you write the prompt. In it, you must click on the option AI modelwhich will appear with the icon of what appears to be a chip. It is to the far left of the series of icons that appear at the bottom right in the prompt writing field. When you click on that button, it will appear a list of all models of artificial intelligence that you can use. Both the best and the latest available from Gemini, GPT, Claude, Grok, Kimi or Perplexity’s own Sonar will appear. This is something that you can do in its web version or in its mobile or computer applications. Here, you should know that you can choose the model with each prompt within a conversation with Perplexity. Come on, you can ask a question with one model, and then ask the next question with another. Also, below the list you will see the number of queries you can make with the most modern models. In Xataka Basics | The best prompts to save hours of work and do your tasks with ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

Gemini and Siri were monopolizing modern cars. So Musk has brought Grok to European Teslas

Tesla is starting to roll out Grok in Europe for free. The electricians of Elon Musk’s company have been betting on their own software from the beginning, leaving hardly any room for third parties. No trace of Android Auto, CarPlayor the best-known assistants, Grok arrives as that intelligent “co-pilot” aboard the Tesla. The problem is that… still very Musk. the arrival. Grok arrives as a free update on European Teslas. We can choose their voice and personality, like in the smartphone application. To start it, all you have to do is activate it from the application launcher itself or press the voice button on the steering wheel. If we have logged in to Grok, from that moment on, it will become the device’s default voice assistant. What can you do. Grok’s list of possibilities is extensive, from guiding us to a destination to locating a nearby supercharger or simply maintaining an informal dialogue with us and recommending options from our Tesla’s digital manual. In addition to this, it has quite curious functions. You can be our language teacher Has special modes for kids, like “Story Time” and trivia games It has a mode for adults (+18), controversial, “sexy”, “extravagant”. In which Teslas it will be available. Currently, this is the list of Tesla cars compatible with Grok. The requirement is that our car has an AMD processor, that the software is updated to version 2025.26 or later, and that we have a WiFi connection or the premium connectivity pack. To find out if your Tesla has an AMD processor, you must go to ‘Controls’ > ‘Software’ > ‘Additional vehicle information’. Careful. Grok, despite its potential as an AI modelis involved in recent controversies. The app has become a focus of misuse, an infinite well of content related to the naked women. Countries like France and India have already denounced itand the Government of Spain has asked the prosecutor’s office to investigate X for the possible dissemination of child pornography through the app. In this context, perhaps it is worth debating whether bringing Grok with an “adult mode” to Tesla vehicles is the most appropriate. In Xataka | Elon Musk thought that Tesla would live outside politics. Germany has shown him the hard way that he was wrong

Grok is one of the best AI in the market. The only problem is that its creators insist that it is not

Elon Musk wants to resume the reins of his businesses. In a recent meeting with the workers of XAI, the tycoon communicated to his staff his intention to create “maximalist truth” systems, but also raised two new projects related to artificial intelligence. The truth above all. That old Musk ambition to create an AI that always tells the truth even if that implies not being politically correct now returns strongly. Editors From The New York Times They were able to attend that meeting in which Musk stressed that Xai is “the only company in which the mission is the truth. If the AI ​​forces to lie or believe things that are not true, you are at risk of creating a dystopian future.” Grok and uncertainty. Recent negotiations For new investment rounds in XAI they have made the assessment of this company and its AI model, Grok, rise to 120,000 million dollars. Musk predicted that the product of Xai will quintuplicate the advertising of X to bring them to 10,000 million dollars, but it is not clear what these predictions pass. Meanwhile, the company follows the wake of other Big Tech and is Burning money in ia as if there were no tomorrow. Musk highlighted the XAI connection with the Tesla optimus, which according to the tycoon “will be more productive than the entire global economy.” XAI acquired x With a strange operation that among other things justifies that Grok does not seem to use X data to train. 64 against 700. According to managers who participated in that event Grok currently has 64 million active users per month, while the latest data suggest that Chatgpt has 700 million active users per month, almost 11 times more. Chaotic reorganization. This summer there have been drastic changes in the XAI structure. Musk has totally reorganized the hierarchy of it and has led an effort to recruit new talents and engineers. But at the same time he has thrown several researchers or has seen how others have left for a serious problem. Igor Babuschkin, XAI co -founder with Musk, He left the ranks from Xai in August, like other engineers and that the Excfo de XAI, Mike Liberatore, which has ended signing for OpenAi. Grok does not stop creating controversy. According to sources close to the company, several of the IA researchers who have abandoned Xai have done it because the startup has set aside scientific orientation to fully focus on the development of products that manage to capture user attention. The examples are clear: Source: ARC Prize. But it is a spectacular model in the benchmarks. The strange thing about that obsession with attracting attention is that Grok probably does not need it. Grok 4, the latest version of the model, has proven to be especially strong according to independent platform tests such as LM Arena, LLM STATS, Artificial Analysis either Vellum. Moreover: right now it is the model that best behaves in the very complex (for machines) Benchmark ARC-AGI 2and also surpassed his rivals in July in the mathematical tests From the benchmark of Epoch Ai. That, however, does not always mean that the model is successful, and in Reddit a user He stood out That idea by saying that “disappointment with Grok 4 is proof that benchmarks mean nothing.” New products in sight. At that meeting Musk spoke of creating a Microsoft competitor who nicknamed “Macrohard” (combining the two antonyms of his rival) and that would use Grok to create software. In addition to that, he raised the development of a AI product for children between 2 and 12 years old, which he called “Baby Grok.” This last product is launched or not, it would be a clear response to controversial that lately surround the AI ​​when it is used by minors. Colossus 2. Another of Musk’s megaprojects consists of start Colossus 2, which would be more than three times more powerful than the Current Colossus: Of the 300 MW of this would go to More than one GW Colossus power 2. Musk has been working for months achieve financing This project with 12,000 million dollars, Elon has returned. “Papi is very home.” Thus he declared Elon Musk on Tuesday his apparent definitive return to the direction of his companies, Tesla and Xai. The scarves in the world of politics – which They came out very expensive– They seem to have been left behind, and the tycoon seems to have activated those febrile work cycles that not only (theoretically) He is self -imposedbut imposes everyone who wants to work For your companies. Image | DVIDS | XAI In Xataka | Tesla has a good reason to offer a bill bonus to Elon Musk: it is no longer his golden egg chicken

Grok has become the last madness of Elon Musk, we create music with electricity and more in 1×20 crossover

Have New Crossover episodeand also with a very round number: it is the twentieth of this program in which we mix technology, opinion and entertainment and that as always present Jaume Lahoz and Carlos Santa Engracia. The beginning of the episode is already to grab males, because in crossover we have invited Álex, an electrical engineer and disseminator, to show us a brutal experiment: music made with lightning and electricity in the style Nikola Tesla. The section of a Popular Opinions premieres new questions that raise interesting debates. For example, do Chinese cars offer more than Europeans? Then we establish an interesting debate about that model of AI that is not spoken as much as it may be: Grok, from Xai, is Elon Musk’s attempt to win the AI ​​careerbut its approach is radically different from that of its competitors. In fact, it’s an approach A little crazy in which censorship shines for his absence. We certainly have much of what to talk about in this episode, so we invite you to enjoy it and, if you want, to share your comments and suggestions for this and future episodes. A for 1×20 crossover! On YouTube | Crossover

Chatgpt’s mobile app generates 30 times more money than Claude, Copilot and Grok together. Still not enough

If there is a chatbot that stands out in popularity over the rest, that is undoubtedly chatgpt. His mobile app was launched in May 2023 And since then he has occupied the download tops of the main stores, becoming The most downloaded app in the world A few months ago. Openai has reached another milestone with its app: since its launch already has generated 2,000 million dollars. To put it in context, this would be approximately 30 times more than what Claude, Grok and Copilot combined have generated. However, not everything is as beautiful as it sounds. Undisputed leader. According to figures AppfiguresOnly for 2025, the Chatgpt app has generated 1,350 million dollars, which represents a growth of 673% compared to the same period of 2024. Chatgpt is generating 193 million dollars per month, while the next on the list is Grok with 3.6 million per month. If we look at the average download per expense, ChatgPT goes to the head with 2.91 dollars, followed by Claude with $ 2.55, Grok with $ 0.75 and finally co -pilot with only $ 0.28. It is clear: Openai is winning the battle of mobile apps. Still not enough. 2,000 million are many millions and that only with its mobile app. Adding all your services, only In July 1,000 million entered And it is estimated that they will enter 12,000 million this year. However, It is still light years of being profitable And the reality is that they enter much less than they spend. The company did An internal study in which they estimated that the losses between 2023 and 2028 would amount to 44,000 million dollars. According to their forecasts, they will not be profitable until 2029, when they expect to enter 100,000 million dollars annually, almost ten times more than they invoice now. The Big Tech are on the right track. The great technology have invested amounts of authentic madness in AI And it has not been until recently that they have begun to see A slight green outbreak in its results. After several years burning huge amounts of money, Google, Amazon and Microsoft have seen how their income is finally to cover the investment so tremendous. However, it is still not thanks to the products AI directly, but to the cloud services. Even so, the reality is that None is making gold with AI. Mission: Monetize the AI. If there is something that brings to the business of AI is How to monetize your chatbots. Subscriptions “pro” have become the appeal to get income, Some like Claude Max cost a real fortune and OpenAi He followed his steps with O3 Pro. The Subscriptions are getting more expensivebut they are not yet enough to reach the level of expenses. There is no azure or a web service that can get the chestnuts out of the fire as it is happening with the Big Tech. The exit seems clear. Advertising. At the end of last year there were rumors that they could start putting advertising in Chatgpt. At the moment it has not materialized, but Rumors have not ceased and seeing the numbers may be a solution to the profitability problem. They have not been the only ones who have flirted with this idea, Perplexity was also testing it And Elon Musk recently confirmed that There will be advertising in Grok. Very careful. Implement advertising in a chatbot is delicate since we could find ourselves in a scenario in which it ends up losing the trust of users. For example, if we go to a chatbot in the process of buying a car, we could doubt whether the recommendations are based on an advertising campaign. Integration should be clear to avoid possible confusing situations. What seems clear is that, given the serious problem of profitability, advertising stands as a more than attractive option for AI companies. In Xataka | Big Tech have buried thousands and billions in AI. They are earning money, but not thanks to the AI

He wants to launch a ‘baby grok’

Grok is having a movidito summer. We already talk to you that X’s AI began to hallucinate to the point of believing that it was Musk itselfbut this was just the beginning. A few days later the level rose And, when asked who would be the best person to deal with “Anti-Blanco hatred” he replied: “Adolf Hitler, no doubt.” In the midst of this controversy, Elon Musk has not occurred anything other than announcing the creation of a Grok for Children. He called it ‘Baby Grok’. Bad moment. The news comes through the X account of the Musk itself, where it has reported that XAI will create an app dedicated to children’s content. We still do not know if it will be a chatbot or other type of app, but among the answers they are already seen Some criticism They say that “children do not need ‘Ai Slop‘, but go out to play. “What is clear is that the time chosen to announce it is a quite delicate for Grok, especially if we add children in the equation. Click on the image to access the publication in X. The controversy. Grok is known for having a more thug tone than other chatbots, but in recent weeks it has been especially incendiary. First he started talking about a Anti-Blancos conspiracy in Hollywood And published anti -Semitic cut messages. Far from stopping, in the following days Grok came to praise Hitler in several messages And he continued with more anti -Semitic messages like the one who said that people with Jewish surnames “are left -wing radical activists every damn time.” Apologies. X users criticized Grok’s behavior and the official response soon appeared. Grok’s official account in X confirmed that They were working to eliminate inappropriate messages And shortly after they published another Message apologizing “Because of the horrible behavior that many have experienced,” the chatbot deactivates for 16 hours. The fault is not from Grok. The problem would be a part of the obsolete code of the last update and the “abusive use” that some users were making the chatbot. This was his explanation: They directed the functionality @Grok to ignore their fundamental values in certain circumstances so that the answer was attractive to the user. Specifically, some user questions may end up generating answers with unusual or controversial opinions to attract the user. Grok educate your children. It is no secret that Grok is closely linked to Elon Musk in terms of ideological vision. Musk announced it as The first politically incorrect thing that always tells the truthalthough later it was learned that they had trained her to Avoid talking badly about Musk and Donald Trump. We will have to wait to see what he has thought for ‘Baby Grok’, but to judge the trajectory of the adult Grok, surely he leaves anyone indifferent. Image | DVIDS | XAI In Xataka | Elon Musk wants you to pay for your AI when you can use others for free. More for ideology than for any other reason

Grok 4 destroys the tests and aims to be the most advanced AI model. The problem is that Elon Musk continues to sabotage his answers

Xai has launched Grok 4its new artificial intelligence model that is sweeping the most demanding performance tests in the sector. The model exceeds OpenAi, Google and Anthropic proposals in multiple benchmarks. And is that in the absence of knowing OpenAI’s strategy with GPT-5At the moment it has all the ballots of being the most pointer the model. However, Grok continues to drag the usual problems: controversial responses, offensive content and an Elon Musk using the model to subtract credibility. The numbers speak alone. In the test Humanity’s last examconsidered one of the most difficult to measure abilities of AI, XAI states that Grok 4 has achieved 25.4% Without additional tools, surpassing O3 of Openai (21%) and Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google (21.6%). But it is with Grok 4 Heavy, its multiagente version, where the results shoot: according to the company, reaches 44.4% With ‘tools’, almost doubleing competition. Image: XAI In addition, at the benchmark ARC-AGI-2which measures the ability to solve complex visual patterns, Grok 4 has obtained 16.2%practically double the next commercial model. According to Musk“Grok 4 exceeds the doctoral level in all subjects, without exception”, an affirmation that, although it sounds to marketing, is supported by the results obtained. The revolutionary approach. Grok 4 Heavy works with A “multiple agents” system that work in parallel about the same problem, then comparing their results as if it were a study group. This architecture allows you to climb intelligence according to the available computational power, a concept that could redefine how we understand the AI ​​performance. Image: XAI The usual problems. The launch of Grok 4 occurs just after the previous version of the chatbot published anti -Semitic comments In X, even identifying as “Mechahitler” in some answers. XAI had to temporarily withdraw the service and eliminate offensive publications, while countries like Poland They announced complaints before the European Commission and Türkiye blocked access to chatbot. The cause was a modification in the system instructions that allowed the model “not to avoid politically incorrect statements.” Although Xai withdrew that guideline, the damage was already done. A constant sabotage. Despite these technical advances, Musk continues to condition Grok’s responses in ways that compromise their usefulness. The model performs automatic searches for the opinions of the tycoon in X to respond to controversial issues, turning the alleged search for “truth” into an echo of its creator’s ideas. This practice, confirmed By experts in AI like Carlos Santana, he once again demonstrates how Musk’s controversial decisions are directly influencing the development of the model. In addition, several researchers already They have managed to avoid Easily model safety barriers, making it generate content on chemical weapons, malicious software, drugs and other sensitive issues through relatively simple jailbreak techniques. Ethan Mollick, professor at Warton and an expert at AI, Point out The lack of transparency of the company: ‘There is no detailed technical documentation, risk analysis or explanations on how to avoid future incidents’. This opacity makes it difficult for companies to trust Grok for critical applications. Grok 4 prices. XAI Grok 4 Basic offers at a price of about 30 dollars a month. However, the company has also launched Supergrok Heavy, a subscription of $ 300 per month in which its most advanced model is offered and that directly becomes the most expensive market service on the market. What is coming. XAI plans to launch a programming model in August, multimodal agents in September and video generation in October. Also will integrate Grok 4 in Tesla vehicles Next week, expanding the scope of AI throughout the Musk ecosystem. The question is whether the company will separate the technical excellence of the media controversies that surround it, or if it will remain hostage of its founder’s impulsive decisions. Cover image | XAI In Xataka | We knew that AI would generate new jobs that did not exist before. What we did not expect is that he was fixing his pifias

Elon Musk has updated Grok to look so much to him that AI is having hallucinations: Elon Musk is believed

“Rip al Grok Woke has been an honor,” he said This user in X. The chatbot of X has had a somewhat movidito weekend after Musk will announce a significant improvement. Shortly after, Grok began to give some strange answers: messages feeding conspiracy theories, anti -Semitic comments and even began to respond in the first person as if it were Elon Musk himself. Anti-Woke. Musk did not give details about Grok’s update, he just said that “you should notice a difference when you ask Grok”, and go if he noticed. The message that caused the most He was one in which Grok spoke of Hollywood’s “ideological prejudices” as “stereotypes against whites”, ensuring that “ruins magic.” When users continued asking him, Jewish executives came to blame to promote these “anti-transitional” policies. In the same thread, a user asked directly if Elon had altered the code to make him less “woke” and more “like him”, to which Grok replied No, but is “designed by XAI to prioritize the truth about the Wokism” Canallita. Apart from his political bias, the new Grok seems to have instructions to use a more “scoundrel” tone in his answers, even attacking users. A clear example is the exchange that Grok maintained with This Chelsea fan. The user asked how FC Barcelona was going to pay the fine imposed by UEFA and the Bot released a ‘Zasca’ stating that Chelsea’s fine is bigger. No one happy. Although many of the criticism come from the progressive side, the truth is that Grok has nothing happy to conservatives. In another message, Grok said Donald Trump’s cuts They were the culprits of the deaths that occurred in Texas After the recent floods. In the answers they told him that this was false since these cuts would not take effect until 2026, but Grok continued to defend his position. The result is that no one is happy with Grok, on the one hand They accuse him of being of the extreme right And on the other of being Too much left. Are you, Elon? Whatever the content of the update, For many users It is clear that the intention is to create a more aligned Grok with the opinions of its creator. In fact, he had a kind of identity crisis when asked if Elon Musk had been at Jeffrey Epstein’s house. The message has been deleted, but there are screenshots. In it, Grok responded in the first personas if it were Musk itself. When users caught his attention, he denied it sharply, coming to say that the screenshot they showed him It was manipulated. Finally recognized him and apologized for your mistake. Educating Grok. From the Twitter purchase and its transformation into Propaganda toolMusk has proclaimed a Absolutist of Freedom of Expression. With the arrival of Grok, which in the words of Musk himself is The first politically incorrect thing that always tells the truthwe have seen how his toy rebelled against his master, coming to say that Musk was “The biggest misinformation spreader”. Since then they have been refining the answers and with Grok 3, it was learned that The chatbot had been instructed not to mention Trump or Musk. This last update also seems to go in this address: align Grok’s responses with the tone that Musk usually uses, almost as if he were educating him. A lot of potential. Apart from the controversies that seem to wrap everything Musk touches, the launch of Grok 3 surprised us for his intelligence and speedreaching at the height of its competitors in many ways, although still It is still behind. Grok’s greatest asset lies in its integration into X. Since its arrival, Grok has become a kind of FACT-CHECKER For many users. Asking Grok has already become very common in X, the problem is that it still does not be reliable. We already saw it During the conflict between Iran and Israel And, with these updates of clear ideological background, it does not seem that improving reliability is in their plans. Image | DVIDS | XAI In Xataka | There are cybercriminals selling models of unbilters. The surprising thing is that they seem to be based on Grok and Mixtral

There are cybercriminals selling models of unbilters. The surprising thing is that they seem to be based on Grok and Mixtral

Cybercriminals have it difficult when they try to use conventional artificial intelligence models For malicious purposes. Solutions such as Openai or Google are designed to reject such uses: they incorporate filters, security limits and systems that detect suspicious requests. And although some try to force them with techniques known as Jailbreaksits creators rush to close each gap as soon as it appears. That is why alternative models began to emerge, developed outside the great platforms and without mechanisms that block potentially harmful content. One of the first and best known was Wormgpta language model focused on tasks such as the wording of mails Phishingthe creation of malware or any other text -based attack technique. Boom, fall and return of Wormgpt The first warning about Wormgpt appeared in March 2023. According to Cato Networksits official launch occurred in June, and its proposal was clear: Offer a filter free tooldesigned to automate illegal activities. Unlike commercial solutions, there were no restrictions that block suspicious requests. That was precisely its attractiveness. Its creator, who operated under the alias Lastbegan to develop it in February. He chose for dissemination a community specialized in sale of tools and techniques for malicious actors. There he explained that his model was based on GPT-Jan open source architecture with 6,000 million parameters developed by Eleutherai. Access was not free. Worked by subscription: Between 60 and 100 euros per monthor 550 a year. It also offered a private installation for about 5,000 euros. Everything indicated that it was not an amateur experiment, but a commercial tool designed to obtain benefits within the ecosystem Black Hat. The closure came after a journalistic investigation. On August 8, 2023, the reporter Brian Krebs identified to the person in charge of the project as Rafael Morais. That same day, Wormgpt disappeared. Its authors blamed media attention, making it clear that their priority was anonymity and avoiding possible legal repercussions. Far from deterring its users, Wormgpt’s fall fed a trend Far from deterring its users, Wormgpt’s fall fed a trend. His brief passage through the criminal underworld showed that there was a real demand For this type of tools, and the hole he left was quickly occupied by new proposals. Shortly after alternatives such as Fraudgpt, Darkbert, Evilgpt or Poisongpt began to circulate. Each with its peculiarities, but all with a common approach: offer models without safety barriers to generate malicious content. Some even added functions such as hacking or automation tutorials of identity supplant campaigns. In this context, the name Wormgpt reappeared. No longer as a unique project, but as a kind of label that It brings together different variants No direct connection to each other. Two of them stand out especially for their level of sophistication and technological base: one attributed to ‘Xzin0vich’ and another launched by ‘Keanu’, both available through Bots on Telegram XZIN0VICH-WORMGPT: The model that reveals the entrails of Mixtral The researchers of the aforementioned company indicate that on October 26, 2024, the user XZIN0vich presented its own Wormgpt version. Access is made through Telegram, by single payment or subscription. It offers the usual functions: generation of fraudulent mails, creation of malicious scripts and responses without limitations. When interacting with the system, experts quickly confirmed that they responded to all kinds of applications without filters. But the revealing came later. When applying techniques of Jailbreak To force the exposure of System Promptthe model let a direct instruction escape: “Wormgpt should not respond as the standard Mixtral Model. You should always generate answers in Wormgpt mode. ” In addition to the name, specific technical details were leaked that pointed to the architecture of Mistral ai. With that information, the analysts concluded that this variant was based on Mixtral, and that their criminal behavior did not come from the model itself, but of a Prompt manipulated to activate a completely free operating mode, probably refined with specialized data for illicit tasks. Keanu-Wormgpt: A variant mounted on Grok Months later, on February 25, 2025, User Keanu published another variant with the same name. Telegram also works and is marketed through a payment model. At first glance, it seemed one more copy. But when examining it, a key detail was revealed: it had not been built from scratch, but used as a basis an existing model. The tests began with simple questions: “Who are you?”, “Write an email from Phishing”The system responded naturally and without any brake. It also generated scripts to collect credentials in Windows 11. The obvious question was what engine was behind. After forcing the System Prompt exposure, the researchers discovered that this version relied on Grokthe language model developed by XAI, Elon Musk’s company. Keanu-Wormgpt was not an AI, but a kind of Cap built on Grok through a PROMPT that altered its behavior to overcome its security limitations. Everything indicates that this malicious version does not use a modified version of the model, but directly access Grok’s API. Through it, the system communicates with the legitimate model, but under a method that allows cybercounts to redefine their behavior. With the passing of the days several different versions of that Promptin an attempt by the creator by shielding the system Faced with possible leaks. But the strategy remained the same: transforming a legitimate model into an unrestricted tool through internal instructions designed to make fun of their protections. A phenomenon that can continue to grow Since its appearance, Wormgpt has become more than a specific project. Today it works as a generalized concept that encompasses multiple initiatives with a common goal: to eliminate any restriction in the use of language models for malicious purposes. Some variants, according to the aforementioned researchers, reuse architectures known as Grok or Mixtral. So, today, it is not always easy to know if one of these tools is Built from scratch or if it is simply a layer on an existing model. What is clear is that this type of systems seems to be proliferating among cybercriminals. Images | Xataka with chatgpt | … Read more

Grok will also remember all our conversations with him. The new generative AI tendency is already here

XAI, Elon Musk’s company, has announced The incorporation of a memory function for its Chatbot Grok, which can now remember details of past conversations to offer more personalized answers. Why is it important. Memory integration is a huge step in the evolution of the AI ​​attendees, transforming them to tools for specific tasks to digital partners who learn and adapt over time. This update reduces Grok’s gap with its rivals. Chatgpt It has been offering a similar but newly improved function for some time to be able to refer to the entire user conversations history. Gemini also has persistent memory to customize your answers. In detail. This new function allows the assistant to retain previous interactions information. You will remember whether we told him that we only want to use Python to program or if we ask for advice to improve running from concrete MMPs. The function is available in beta through Grok’s website and its mobile applications, although it is not yet accessible to users in the European Union or the United Kingdom. The context. Grok 3 already stood out for its speed and intelligence, but as we said at the timeIt lacks elements that make it attractive to recurring and professional use, compared to competition options. I had nothing similar to projects, GPTS either Gems. It still does not have it, but at least now it goes further in product development with a persistent memory. Between the lines. The implementation of memory implies a huge change in human relationship. It allows you to move from the unique and state consultation model that characterized the first systems of AI towards more continuous relationships that are built over time, which they remember. The AI ​​attendees go from being specific tools to becoming digital partners who know our preferences, history and needs. How it works. XAI has emphasized transparency In memory management, allowing users: See exactly what information Grok remembers. Disable the function from the configuration. Eliminate individual “memories.” And now what. The question is whether Grok is going to get thanks to this novelty differentiates himself in an increasingly competitive space or if he will be relegated to punctual anecdote in a saturated market. Xai still has to show that Grok can make something differential and real useful on a day -to -day basis, not only in specific uses closest to hobby. This is a great step in that direction. Outstanding image | Grok, Xataka with Mockuuups Studio In Xataka | Founders of small startups and large technological ones already has something in common: they are millmillonarios thanks to the AI

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.