There are cybercriminals selling models of unbilters. The surprising thing is that they seem to be based on Grok and Mixtral

Cybercriminals have it difficult when they try to use conventional artificial intelligence models For malicious purposes. Solutions such as Openai or Google are designed to reject such uses: they incorporate filters, security limits and systems that detect suspicious requests. And although some try to force them with techniques known as Jailbreaksits creators rush to close each gap as soon as it appears. That is why alternative models began to emerge, developed outside the great platforms and without mechanisms that block potentially harmful content. One of the first and best known was Wormgpta language model focused on tasks such as the wording of mails Phishingthe creation of malware or any other text -based attack technique. Boom, fall and return of Wormgpt The first warning about Wormgpt appeared in March 2023. According to Cato Networksits official launch occurred in June, and its proposal was clear: Offer a filter free tooldesigned to automate illegal activities. Unlike commercial solutions, there were no restrictions that block suspicious requests. That was precisely its attractiveness. Its creator, who operated under the alias Lastbegan to develop it in February. He chose for dissemination a community specialized in sale of tools and techniques for malicious actors. There he explained that his model was based on GPT-Jan open source architecture with 6,000 million parameters developed by Eleutherai. Access was not free. Worked by subscription: Between 60 and 100 euros per monthor 550 a year. It also offered a private installation for about 5,000 euros. Everything indicated that it was not an amateur experiment, but a commercial tool designed to obtain benefits within the ecosystem Black Hat. The closure came after a journalistic investigation. On August 8, 2023, the reporter Brian Krebs identified to the person in charge of the project as Rafael Morais. That same day, Wormgpt disappeared. Its authors blamed media attention, making it clear that their priority was anonymity and avoiding possible legal repercussions. Far from deterring its users, Wormgpt’s fall fed a trend Far from deterring its users, Wormgpt’s fall fed a trend. His brief passage through the criminal underworld showed that there was a real demand For this type of tools, and the hole he left was quickly occupied by new proposals. Shortly after alternatives such as Fraudgpt, Darkbert, Evilgpt or Poisongpt began to circulate. Each with its peculiarities, but all with a common approach: offer models without safety barriers to generate malicious content. Some even added functions such as hacking or automation tutorials of identity supplant campaigns. In this context, the name Wormgpt reappeared. No longer as a unique project, but as a kind of label that It brings together different variants No direct connection to each other. Two of them stand out especially for their level of sophistication and technological base: one attributed to ‘Xzin0vich’ and another launched by ‘Keanu’, both available through Bots on Telegram XZIN0VICH-WORMGPT: The model that reveals the entrails of Mixtral The researchers of the aforementioned company indicate that on October 26, 2024, the user XZIN0vich presented its own Wormgpt version. Access is made through Telegram, by single payment or subscription. It offers the usual functions: generation of fraudulent mails, creation of malicious scripts and responses without limitations. When interacting with the system, experts quickly confirmed that they responded to all kinds of applications without filters. But the revealing came later. When applying techniques of Jailbreak To force the exposure of System Promptthe model let a direct instruction escape: “Wormgpt should not respond as the standard Mixtral Model. You should always generate answers in Wormgpt mode. ” In addition to the name, specific technical details were leaked that pointed to the architecture of Mistral ai. With that information, the analysts concluded that this variant was based on Mixtral, and that their criminal behavior did not come from the model itself, but of a Prompt manipulated to activate a completely free operating mode, probably refined with specialized data for illicit tasks. Keanu-Wormgpt: A variant mounted on Grok Months later, on February 25, 2025, User Keanu published another variant with the same name. Telegram also works and is marketed through a payment model. At first glance, it seemed one more copy. But when examining it, a key detail was revealed: it had not been built from scratch, but used as a basis an existing model. The tests began with simple questions: “Who are you?”, “Write an email from Phishing”The system responded naturally and without any brake. It also generated scripts to collect credentials in Windows 11. The obvious question was what engine was behind. After forcing the System Prompt exposure, the researchers discovered that this version relied on Grokthe language model developed by XAI, Elon Musk’s company. Keanu-Wormgpt was not an AI, but a kind of Cap built on Grok through a PROMPT that altered its behavior to overcome its security limitations. Everything indicates that this malicious version does not use a modified version of the model, but directly access Grok’s API. Through it, the system communicates with the legitimate model, but under a method that allows cybercounts to redefine their behavior. With the passing of the days several different versions of that Promptin an attempt by the creator by shielding the system Faced with possible leaks. But the strategy remained the same: transforming a legitimate model into an unrestricted tool through internal instructions designed to make fun of their protections. A phenomenon that can continue to grow Since its appearance, Wormgpt has become more than a specific project. Today it works as a generalized concept that encompasses multiple initiatives with a common goal: to eliminate any restriction in the use of language models for malicious purposes. Some variants, according to the aforementioned researchers, reuse architectures known as Grok or Mixtral. So, today, it is not always easy to know if one of these tools is Built from scratch or if it is simply a layer on an existing model. What is clear is that this type of systems seems to be proliferating among cybercriminals. Images | Xataka with chatgpt | … Read more

Grok will also remember all our conversations with him. The new generative AI tendency is already here

XAI, Elon Musk’s company, has announced The incorporation of a memory function for its Chatbot Grok, which can now remember details of past conversations to offer more personalized answers. Why is it important. Memory integration is a huge step in the evolution of the AI ​​attendees, transforming them to tools for specific tasks to digital partners who learn and adapt over time. This update reduces Grok’s gap with its rivals. Chatgpt It has been offering a similar but newly improved function for some time to be able to refer to the entire user conversations history. Gemini also has persistent memory to customize your answers. In detail. This new function allows the assistant to retain previous interactions information. You will remember whether we told him that we only want to use Python to program or if we ask for advice to improve running from concrete MMPs. The function is available in beta through Grok’s website and its mobile applications, although it is not yet accessible to users in the European Union or the United Kingdom. The context. Grok 3 already stood out for its speed and intelligence, but as we said at the timeIt lacks elements that make it attractive to recurring and professional use, compared to competition options. I had nothing similar to projects, GPTS either Gems. It still does not have it, but at least now it goes further in product development with a persistent memory. Between the lines. The implementation of memory implies a huge change in human relationship. It allows you to move from the unique and state consultation model that characterized the first systems of AI towards more continuous relationships that are built over time, which they remember. The AI ​​attendees go from being specific tools to becoming digital partners who know our preferences, history and needs. How it works. XAI has emphasized transparency In memory management, allowing users: See exactly what information Grok remembers. Disable the function from the configuration. Eliminate individual “memories.” And now what. The question is whether Grok is going to get thanks to this novelty differentiates himself in an increasingly competitive space or if he will be relegated to punctual anecdote in a saturated market. Xai still has to show that Grok can make something differential and real useful on a day -to -day basis, not only in specific uses closest to hobby. This is a great step in that direction. Outstanding image | Grok, Xataka with Mockuuups Studio In Xataka | Founders of small startups and large technological ones already has something in common: they are millmillonarios thanks to the AI

I have tried Grok 3 and it is really intelligent and fast. The problem is that this is no longer enough

I’ve spent a few hours trying Grok 3the new version of Xai AI. I wanted to see their real abilities and especially how it behaves, what kind of results, in front of Chatgpt, Claude, Le chat, Deepseek… Reasoning and problem solving It stands out in mathematical problems. I made him complete the challenge Aime’24of which he was 6 of the 15 problems, for the 9 hits of OPENAI O3-mini-high. In addition, Grok 3 took a little less than five minutes, but O3-mini-High took almost six. Very striking to see their self -assessments until you find the correct answer (although sometimes it was not). A fragment of the steps that Grok 3 took to evaluate their own conclusions before presenting them as a final result. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. In basic reasoning tests, such as determining the number of repeated letters in somewhat complex words (the classic “lollapalooza”) or comparing decimals (9.11 vs 9.9), Grok 3 responds correctly after a few seconds of visible “thought”. O3-mini-High Be right after 6 seconds. Image: Xataka with chatgpt. Grok 3 also succeeded, but after more than four times longer. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. In a Greek mythology question about Jason’s maternal great-grandfather, Grok 3 found the correct answer in 18 seconds … while O3-mini-High needed 22 seconds to fail. Well played, Grok. O3-mini-High missed. Image: Xataka with chatgpt. Grok 3 instead gave a better built response, in addition to correct. And it takes less. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. Search and synthesis Its function Deepsearch is fast but sometimes it is not entirely precise and does not mention any important detail. I asked to analyze the impact of AI on chips design and, although it generated a text of 1,504 words with several quotes in just over a minute, omitted to mention important advances such as the framework ALPHACHIP from Google. In later and insistent attempts he did. I also asked for a full report on Xataka On financial, media, reputational level, etc. It was quite successful, although it showed an inherent limitation of any Deep Research system: He knows a lot about what is in public, but he doesn’t have many Insightsit lacks the expert criteria that knows not only the public, but what underlies. This is something of Grok and any other with Deep Research. When you ask for information about something you do not control, it is easy to assume that Deep Research (or in this case, Deepsearch) gives you everything. When you are in garlic it is easy to detect deficiencies. As in this example. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. The speed impresses: it is remarkably faster than Deep Research of OpenAi … but at the cost of sacrificing depth for speed. Of course, your selection of sources and appointments is usually really good. Unlike Gemini, it does not allow exporting reports directly to documents or customize the research approach. Again: Grok is very intelligent and capable, in his own way, but he lacks a product. Little llm is of little use if it forces to start from scratch and process all the information. Creativity and tone To try his creative writing I asked him for a story about a time traveler facing a paradox. The result was quite solid in construction of characters, details, descriptions and atmosphere, overcoming even the one that I consider the best in that aspect, Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Of course, some plot turns seem quite forced. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. His humor is basic and predictable, limited almost all the time to quite obvious words games. Teenage humor If the concept of disturbing valley You can move to a chatbot, Grok 3 is in that 99%: too fine to look like a caid robot, too predictable to finish convincing. It maintains political neutrality even on issues such as immigration or trans rights. Musk says it can be politically incorrectbut it seems that it is something that has more to do with what the user requires that a feature of his personality. That is to say: it can be taken out of correction, but only when the user pushes to it. Some limitations It does not allow customizing the behavior of the model, unlike chatgpt; or the response style, as Claude allows. It is limited to being a text drawer. You are only accompanied by the buttons to attach a file, activate your Deepsearch or activate your reasoning mode. That, and a few elementary instructions. No projects such as Claude or GPTS of Chatgpt, or the agents of Le Chat. In short: Nothing to retain pre -established contexts and guidelines or documentation to facilitate work. We always have to start from a new canvas. The interface is good, intuitive, simple … but they miss tools that make it more versatile and appetizing to integrate it into our day to day. It is powerful and capable for specific uses, but the product built around chatgpt, claude or le chat (projects, agents, previous instructions, etc.) make those alternatives something much more interesting for serious and recurring use. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. The security keeps are stricter than those of Grok 2. with that version We hallucinate for its lack of scruplesbut Grok 3 seems to recover them: he refused to generate a template for a mass fraud campaign by mail simulating that I am a Valencian prince in search of heiress. The generation of images does seem, again, more lax. Midjourney does not allow to create anything containing the words “Donald Trump” or “President of the United States”. Nothing. Grok 3 does not put so many objections. Not even with its owner. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. You can try Grok 3 from its official website or from Its integration into x (which is why you have seen two somewhat different interfaces in this article). It is temporarily free, but we already know that it will be one of the reasons to pay a subscription to X, and not the cheap. Its ability … Read more

Grok 3 does not arrive and Xai is staying behind

In the last hours we have known The offer Elon Musk has made Not by OpenAi as such, but for the one by the non -profit association (nonprofit) that controls it. That has unleashed a debate about the true reasons for this offer, but also leaves a question in the candlestick: in what situation is Elon Musk in the AI ​​segment? Hi, Xai. Elon Musk carries in a Open war with Sam Altman for years, and in fact In April 2023, Xai created to develop their own AI models. Since then the company has launched some AI models and made striking advances with Grokbut it seems to be left in many lands. In others, yes, it surprises. Grok was sarcastic … In November 2023 XAI Grok presentedthe AI ​​model that competed with Chatgpt and did it with a striking characteristic: had a sarcastic tone. From its launch and for months Grok It was only available for X subscribers. … and Grok 2 has no censorship. In August 2024 the new version was presented, Grok 2more advanced and powerful. However, what caught the attention of this model was its apparent lack of censorship. Thus, it is possible Generate images of any kind, including Deepfakes of famous peoplesomething that other models do not allow. Elon Musk and XAI announced in December 2024 that They opened the model To all X users without having a payment subscription, something that undoubtedly promoted its use and popularity. Grok 1 is “Open Source” (but Grok 2 No). One of Grok’s striking features is that Elon Musk shared this project as Open Source. The gigantic original model, of 314,000 million parameters (314b) was then four times larger that calls 2, the other great reference in Open Source models, with 65b size. The funny thing is that Grok 2 is not: it is not in the Official XAI repository In Github, and there is no news that the same thing that happened with his predecessor will happen. Investment rounds. In November 2024 Elon Musk got lift 5,000 million dollars For XAI, who joined the round of 6,000 million dollars that raised in May 2024 and at least two other planned rounds According to Crunchbase. The firm certainly seems to have notable funds, but be careful, because it is surely burning them, as with OpenAi. 100,000 NVIDIA GPUS. Last summer Musk lit “The most powerful the world of the world“, which apparently was baptized With the name of Colossus and that has 100,000 GPUS NVIDIA H100. It is supposed to be used to train its new model of AI, Grok 3, and of course having that computing power is theoretically a guarantee to stay competitive with its rivals. Where is Grok 3? But the truth is that Grok 3 still does not appear, and that Musk promised to have it ready in December. Musk Indian In January that Grok 3 “will arrive soon” and that the pre-training stage was complete and had used 10 times more computation capacity than with Grok 2. In Tom’s Hardware they also point out that XAI has used the data generated by users of X for that training. Reasoning models and AI agents. The great unknown is what will happen with XAI in two areas where its competitors are advancing to forced marches. Deepseek R1 has promoted the Free availability of reasoning models, but there are also several AI companies that have already shown agricultural models such as Operator of OpenAi or Computer Use of Anthropic. That XAI knows does not have alternatives at the moment. The rear. All this makes it clear that today Xai continues to rely in most proposals in the market. His models are not the best, he has no reasoning models or public agents, and Musk seems to be more interested in putting the Zancadilla to Altman already OpenAi than to get XAI to lead this technological career. Even so, surely there will be news of the company soon, and it will be then that we can value the real situation of it. Image | DVIDS | XAI In Xataka | Chatgpt and its rivals are sosainas. And turning them into funny chatbots will not be easy

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.