control

Reddit, nude scenes and an out of control forum. This is how a Dane ended up being convicted in a case that marks a precedent

by

We have all seen a clip from a movie circulating online as if it were a loose object, separated from the story to which it belongs. In Denmark, a case has shown that this decontextualization can have very real consequences when what is shared are nude scenes and, in addition, other protected content. A Reddit moderator has been convicted in a case involving both the dissemination of sequences of actresses in Danish films and series taken out of context and the massive exchange of audiovisual works. The forum that triggered the case, “SeDetForPlottet”, was not a marginal space within Reddit: it brought together thousands of users and maintained constant activity around nude scenes taken from Danish productions. There, cut clips were shared and described with the name and surname of the actresses, which generated concern among several professionals in the sector. Your complaints They arrived on a local radio programwhich focused on how these images circulated converted into sexualized content. A case that ends in a criminal conviction. The public exposure of the subreddit led to the Rights Alliance will report the matter in 2023 on behalf of actors, directors, producers and two major Danish networks. The police then opened an investigation that identified the moderator, who was arrested in September 2024 after it was confirmed that he had shared hundreds of edited clips and additional material on a private platform. The accused admitted the facts and, in November 2025, received a sentence of seven months of suspended prison, a figure that avoids entering prison if the imposed conditions are met, in addition to 120 hours of community service. When the problem is not just money. The Danish ruling is based on an unusual concept outside the legal field: the right to respectwhich seeks to protect the integrity of a work and those who participate in it, and which in this case is applied for the first time in a criminal conviction in Denmark. The court understood that extracting the scenes, cutting them and presenting them with a sexualized approach altered their original meaning and harmed performers and creators. Prosecutor Jan Østergaard stressed that the case shows that these violations are taken seriously, while copyright expert Alina Trapova explained to the BBC that the matter is “unusual” for focusing on damage to artistic integrity rather than economic damage. What is protected when a scene is shot. For associations of actors and directors, the failure represents an explicit recognition that the decontextualized use of nude scenes directly affects those who appear in them. In the statement published by Rettighedsalliancenthe director of the Danish Association of Actors, Maria Ventegodt, welcomed that the ruling recognized the violation suffered by its members and reinforced confidence that the authorities will act in these cases. In that same text, the directors’ spokesperson, Søren Balle, highlighted that altering and redistributing these scenes harms both the performers and the integrity of the work. On the Internet we live daily with fragments of films converted into memes, parodies or small clips that serve to comment on a scene. This clip culture has normalized the fact that works travel without context, something that usually goes unnoticed when the objective is to play with the original reference. But the Danish case had a decisive nuance. There, the dynamic was different: users organized the material by specific names, requested specific scenes and received them through links from a pornographic page. A warning for the era of AI and deepfakes. The Danish case is known at a time when artificial intelligence tools allow you to alter videos with increasing ease. In this context, the head of Rights Alliance, Maria Fredenslund, pointed out that the ruling marks a necessary limit on how images of actors and creators are used and warned that this type of protection will be relevant in a scenario with more content generated and manipulated by AI. As we say, the sentence is set in the form of a suspended prison, so the accused will not enter prison as long as he meets the conditions imposed. With that part already resolved, the case moves to civil proceedings, where the rights holders have requested between 15,000 and 30,000 Danish crowns for each clip broadcast (between 2,000 and 4,000 euros). Images | Brett Jordan | Screenshot | appshunter In Xataka | For the EU, our privacy has always been more important than AI. Until he understood that he was left behind

On this island in Japan there is a traffic light that only turns green once a year, and not precisely to control traffic

by

On the small Japanese island of Himakajima there is a traffic light which remains flashing amber or red all year round. Only during one day in May does it change its usual behavior and activate its green light (or blue, as they insist in Japan). This is not a fault. It was designed this way for a reason that goes beyond traffic control. An educational traffic light. The traffic light was installed in 1994 at the Himakajima East Port intersection, but not to regulate traffic. The island barely has 2,000 inhabitants and few vehicles circulate on its roads. The traffic light exists solely to teach children of the place how the urban signals work before they leave the island for larger cities. One less problem. According to explains the Himaka Road Safety Association, which promoted its installation, minors grew up without real experience with traffic lights. Before, they used small models in traffic safety classes, but the children themselves asked “what does a real traffic light look like?” account Kazuo Sugiura, former president of the association, to the local media Asahi. One day a year to learn. Every May, the traffic light is activated for a full day. Third and fifth grade students from the local school go to the crossing accompanied by teachers, parents and authorities. There they practice how to cross correctly: they wait for the color to change, look both ways and cross the zebra crossing with their arm raised, just as they would in any city in Japan. More difficult than expected. The children also discover that calculating the time they have to cross the pass is not as simple as it seems. “It was complicated because it turned red when I was trying to cross,” explained a third-grade student after practicing with her bicycle. The exercise helps them understand the real times of light change and develop security reflexes that they cannot acquire in their daily life on the island. An unexpected tourist curiosity. This little anecdote has gained notoriety beyond Japan. Every year videos and photos circulate on social networks showing the peculiar educational ritual. Some users even consult the local government website to find out the exact date of “green day” and witness the event, although it varies slightly each season. It is already part of the island’s identity. Once the annual training is completed, the traffic light returns to its flashing lights routine. It does not serve any practical function in traffic control, but it has ended up becoming a small symbol of how the community of this island prepares its children for the urban world. The rest of the year, Himakajima remains a quiet place known for its beaches and octopus dishes, with a traffic light that counts down the days until it can turn green again. Cover image | Google Maps In Xataka | Convenience stores were an emblem of Japan. Until the demographic crisis has revealed the dark side of opening 24 hours

control who sells and where you buy, all in ChatGPT

by

A few days ago we talked about how OpenAI is turning ChatGPT into the Windows of AI. It’s not really about whether OpenAI is building an operating system. It’s about what kind of power you’re looking for. And the answer lies in two models that define exactly what OpenAI pursues: Apple’s App Store and WeChat in China. The App Store controls distribution. Decide what apps exist, how they are promoted, what commissions are charged. WeChat centralizes functionality. Within a single app you do absolutely everything: you call, you shop, you order taxis, you pay bills, you reserve restaurants. OpenAI wants both things at the same time. And so far no one has achieved it. The moment. Apple actively blocked superapps on iOS. The documents from the Epic v. Apple trial made it very clear: allowing one app to do everything “would threaten the monopoly” because “adherence to the system would decrease.” Apple called it “letting in the barbarians.” Meta tried it with Facebook. Musk, in his own way, tries with X. They failed because Apple didn’t let them and because they didn’t have the right platform. The play. Ben Thompson, of Stratecheryhe sees it clearly: OpenAI follows Microsoft’s original strategy with Windows. Apple integrates hardware and software, controls everything, but leaves room for competitors because it cannot serve all markets. Microsoft dominated without having to sell hardware. He only controlled the platform. OpenAI does exactly that: Control the interface. Control who users reach. And let others build on top. The difference with 2023-2024 is enormous. So They launched the GPT Store. Failure. Our own GPTs were and are very useful, but those of others were isolated in a store that no one visited. Now the Spotify, Canva, Zillow, Uber or Booking apps are not in a separate store. They are integrated into the core of the experience. They appear when they are relevant. They work within the chat. Who is this good for?: For developers, they receive immediate access to 800 million weekly users without going through Apple or Google. Without building an audience from scratch. But in exchange, they have absolute dependence on an OpenAI that decides which apps are approved, which ones stand out, or how they are monetized. If your app competes with something OpenAI wants to do, you’re out. It is the classic dilemma of platforms. Rapid growth in exchange for zero control. For companies that sell products, the rules of the game change completely. Before you would type “hotels in Valencia” in Google and browse through ten results. Now you have to explicitly say “search on Booking” or “search on Airbnb”. Strong brands in people’s minds will survive. Those that lived off organic traffic from Google will disappear. There are entire businesses that prospered thanks to SEO in the Google era. Those businesses were never really strong because they were optimizations for a specific technological era. The wave of snippets several of those businesses were loaded in the search results. The next wave will sweep away a few more. The problem. Microsoft is OpenAI’s largest investor and infrastructure partner. But now they compete directly. Microsoft launched Copilot Studioits own platform for businesses to create custom agents. And that competes head-on with what OpenAI has just launched. If OpenAI had remained a simple model provider, Microsoft would have turned it into commodity. This app platform is a declaration of independence. It is pure coopetition: partners who must compete for the dominant role. What’s at stake. Sam Altman summed it up this week: “Most people will want to have a single AI service, and that service has to be useful throughout their lives.” Your entire life not understood as “from today until you die”, but rather as “all areas of your life.” Work and pleasure, leisure and business. What OpenAI pursues is not to be one platform among many. It is to be the platform: The place where everything happens. Where users spend their time. Where companies have to be to exist. Apple without the hardware. WeChat without regulatory restrictions. The App Store without the bottleneck of manual approval. Everything at once. Maybe they will get it. Maybe not. But they are executing the perfect play at the perfect time. And that, in technology, is sometimes enough. Another thing is that Excel resists. In Xataka | The more money they lose, the more they are worth: ten AI startups have skyrocketed their valuation by $1 trillion in 12 months Featured image | Xataka with Mockuuups Studio

semiconductor control

by

The Dutch government has taken control of Nexperia, a semiconductor company based in the Netherlands but owned by China. To do this, it has used its “Law of Availability of Assets” for the first time. And with this he has made the chip war face a new and tense episode. what has happened. Nexperia is a chip manufacturer that was spun off from the Dutch company NXP Semiconductors. In 2017 Nexperia was acquired for $2.75 billion by a Chinese state-backed consortium, and became majority owned by Chinese technology group Wingtech in 2019. As indicated in Financial Timesthe company has now been unexpectedly seized by the Dutch government, which has alleged “serious deficiencies in governance and actions.” That allows Dutch Economy Minister Vincent Karremans to take de facto control over Nexperia’s operations. Objective, protect Europe’s chips. It is the first time that Holland makes use of its “Law on Availability of Assets.” The economy minister assured that the decision was made due to “a threat to the continuity and safeguarding of crucial technological knowledge and capabilities in Dutch and European territory.” Nexperia produces used chips in the European automobile industry and in consumer electronics. Geopolitical tension. The Dutch government’s intervention in the company has escalated rapidly in recent days. In early October, several court decisions suspended the powers of Nexperia’s Chinese CEO, Zhang Xuezheng. A court later ordered that he be succeeded by a non-Chinese director with decisive voting power, in addition to transferring almost all of the shares to custodial management. Wingtech officials have called the decision an “act of excessive interference driven by geopolitical bias.” It was already on the “entity list”. The United States has already added Wingtech to its particular commercial blacklist —the famous “entity list”— in 2024, accusing it of helping China obtain sensitive semiconductor manufacturing technology. That forced US companies that wanted to work with Wingtech to obtain a specific license, and doing so is not easy. Restrictions on trade even with subsidiaries of companies on that list have become even more complicated a few weeks ago, which made working with Nexperia, a subsidiary of Wingtech, even more problematic. The chip war intensifies. This technological seizure is another clear symptom of the growing geopolitical reconfiguration that we are experiencing in the technological field. We are passing from the era of economic globalization to an era of technological sovereignty and national security. For decades, market efficiency caused companies to seek global ownership and production even in critical sectors such as semiconductors. This decision by the Dutch government once again signals the end of that era of complacency in which if a Chinese company acquired a vital chip company on European soil nothing seemed to happen. Now it happens. The Netherlands had already made things difficult for Beijing. If there is a leading technology company in Europe Nowadays that’s ASML. This semiconductor giant has an effective monopoly on photolithography machines SVU and High aperture SVU. The sanctions of the US and its allies ASML is prevented from selling in China its most advanced lithography equipment. Holland was therefore already one of China’s great “enemies” in this chip war, but the movement with Nexperia goes even further. And meanwhile, rare earths and tariffs. The seizure of Nexperia is the new chapter in this recent escalation of events that was reactivated last week. China imposed new restrictions on rare earth exportwhich caused the US government will increase tariffs by 100% to Chinese imports. Tension is increasing, and the chip war could have enormous consequences for the global economy. We are already seeing it in the stock markets: the announcement of the tariffs caused a notable drop in both the stock markets like in the cryptocurrency market. We will see how this new move by the Dutch government affects these assets. In Xataka | The biggest obstacle preventing China from winning the chip race is called ASML. So they’re trying to copy it

How to configure it and what options are there to control what your children can do with artificial intelligence

by

Let’s explain How to configure parental control of Chatgpt to have control over what the minors of your home do with the artificial intelligence. You can also receive notifications when these minors perform certain tasks. We will explain step by step the process to configure the account of the minors to link it to yours. Then, we will briefly tell you how to configure these controls and the options you have. This moment option is only available on the web version Chatgpt, although soon it will also reach mobile and desktop apps. First configure parental control To configure parental control, you first have to open chatgpt using the account of who is going to manage the family. Once inside, Enter the chatgpt configuration Pressing in your profile image and choosing this option. Once inside the configuration, in the left column Go to the section of Parental controls. Here inside, click on the option of Add a family member That will appear. Now you have to Add the email of the minors account That you want to link your family, choosing that it is your son or daughter, and clicking on sending. You can also use a phone number if the account is registered with one. Although this is the simplest, you can also do it in reverse and send the invitation from the child account saying that the person sent to him is father, mother or guardians. Now, an invitation from OpenAi will arrive to the email account of the child or the child to join your family, and They will have to click on the link of the invitation and accept to join once chatgpt. When doing so, family members will appear in the parental control section. Now configure parental controls Once you have created the family, you have to go to the configuration of Parental controls in chatgpt settings. Once inside, click on the name of the minor whose permits you want to configure. This will take you to a panel where you can Activate or deactivate the following parameters: Reduces sensitive content: It will reduce the sensitive content of the answers. Improve the model for all: If deactivated, the child’s chats will stop sending chats to chatgpt servers Refer to stored memories: It allows to keep memories of what has been answered and asked before by the child. You can deactivate it. Voice mode: You can activate or deactivate using chatgpt voice mode. Image generation: You can allow or not allowing the child to create images with chatgpt. Hours of silence: You can configure the start and end of a period in which this child will not be able to use chatgpt with your account. In addition to this, on the parental control screen You can also configure a series of notifications related to the activity of the child. They can be chatgpt notifications or notifications and emails. It’s these: Answers: Receive notifications when ChatgPT will answer requests to the child who require a time to generate the answer, such as investigations or image creation. Safety notifications for adolescents: You can make you notify if the minor asks questions related to serious security issues. Tasks: You can receive notifications if you have modified tasks that have been created. In Xataka Basics | 14 Functions, tricks and ideas to squeeze the analysis of chatgpt images

The controversial statement of the Danish minister about chat control

by

Peter Hummelgaard is the Minister of Justice of Denmark and has become one of the greatest defenders of Chat Control. The measure, which is part of the regulation to fight child abuse on the network, would mean a Hard blow to the privacy of European citizens to the end the end -to -end encryptionbut for Humelgaard this should not be a right. Hard statements. While other European countries are discussed on whether the end (fighting child abuse) justifies the media (that everyone’s conversations cease to be private), Danish justice has a very hard position about it. In Danish television statementsHummelgaard said that: “We must break with the totally wrong perception that communicating through encrypted messaging services is a civil freedom of all.” Maximum priority. Last week we collected the news of the Chat Control Return. The measure, which has been rejected aboveis being promoted again by Denmark, which since July occupies the presidency of the EU Council. Denmark was always in favor of this measure, and now They are treating it with the highest priority. What is chat control. It is the name with which the CSAM regulation (Child sex abuse material) is known. What Denmark wants and countries in favor of this measure is that the authorities can force the messaging services to give access to the content to scan it in real time, including those who are encrypted from extreme to the end, such as WhatsApp or Signal. Although it is presented with a very specific purpose, in practice it would be open the door to mass surveillance. Positions. On September 12 there was a meeting in which the countries made their position in front of this measure, whose final vote will occur next October 14. The positions of the countries have moved these days and, according to the Fight Chat Control informationthere are currently 14 states in favor, 10 against and 3 undecided states. If the undecided choose to reject it, there would be a draw. A lot of at stake. And on both sides. Germany has been one of the countries that has recently opposed the measure and Point out the problem From the Danish proposal: “Private and confidential communications must remain private. At the same time, there is an obligation to combat child abuse on the Internet (…) Danish posture cannot be backed 100 %.” Luxembourg, Slovakia And Estonia also recently opposed. Spain wants chat control. In 2023, before Chat Control was first rejected, A filtration revealed that The Government of Spain was in favor of ending end -to -end encryption. In a debate on the subject and while other countries defended the possibility of scanning in search of sensitive material without ending the encrypted, Minister Grande Marlaska said that “it is essential that we have access to the data (encrypted).” Images | World Economic Forum and Pexels In Xataka | Nepal’s youth are experiencing a new type of democracy: deciding the country’s future in discord

‘Chat Control’ votes tomorrow and Spain is in favor

by

The regulation on child sexual abuse or CSAMalso known as chat control, was first promoted in 2022. With the aim of protecting minors, he proposed end the end -to -end encryptionwhat in practice would be A hard blow to the privacy of all citizens. Although the proposal It was rejected In 2023, now he is on the table again. What happened. The presidency of the European Union Council is rotary and changes every six months. From July 1 to the end of the year it is the turn of Denmark and One of his first decisions was to resurrect chat control. At least fifteen Member States showed their support, so it went ahead and the vote will occur tomorrow, September 12. If it is finally approved, it would come into force as soon as October of this year. Chat Control. It is how this proposal has nicknamed among the most critical sectors. With the aim of detecting possible child pornography material, you want to end encryption messaging that is currently standard in massive apps such as WhatsApp. Security experts and Citizen Organizations They have raised their voice against this measure for supposing a serious violation of privacy and opens the door to mass surveillance. The balance is inclined. Many countries have already shown their position in this debate. During the inciative Fight Chat Controlthere are fifteen member states in favor of approving chat control and seven countries that oppose their implementation. The majority party in Belgium described the proposal as “A monster that invades our privacy.” There are five other undecided states, but if the positions are maintained, Chat Control will be approved with 15 votes in favor and 12 against. Spain, in favor. It is not new. The position of the Government of Spain is favorable For a long time. In mid -2023, a document was leaked of the Council of Europe in which the response of the Minister of Interior Grande-Marlaska appeared, which considered “imperative that we have access to the data (…) It is equally imperative that we have the ability to analyze them, regardless of how large the volume is.” In addition, he openly said that he was in favor of preventing by law from end -to -end encryption. Images | Wikipedia, Pexels In Xataka | LaLiga has turned the start of the season into a digital nightmare: blocks everything to protect the football business

The definitive jump towards the total control of the iPhone

by

Apple has presented the N1 chip next to the iPhone Airthe thinnest phone in its history with only 5.6 millimeters thick. Why it is important. The N1 manages all the wireless connections of the iPhone: Wifi 7, Bluetooth 6 and Thread. It is the last link in Apple’s strategy to internally design each iPhone component, from the main processor to the modem. The context. Apple has been replacing third -party components with own chips for years. First were the processors to replace Intel. Then came MODEM C1 (now C1X) that displaces Qualcomm. Now the N1 eliminates Broadcom dependence and other wireless chip manufacturers. Between the lines. The obsession with total control is no accident. Each own chip allows impossible optimizations with external components, better benefit margins and elimination of Royalties. Apple promises that N1 improves functions such as Airdrop And the mobile access point, something difficult to get with standard solutions. The threat. For traditional suppliers, each Apple chip is lost territory forever. Broadcom, who dominated this segment, loses one of its most lucrative customers. The employer repeats: Apple develops internally, optimizes for your needs and never goes back. And now what? The N1 debuts on the iPhone Air, but will reach the rest of the range. Apple has shown that when a technology dominates, it extends it to all its products. Absolute hardware control is the basis of its competitive advantage. In Xataka | iPhone 17: Apple puts a solution to one of the most criticized aspects of the iPhone Base Outstanding image | Apple

Spacex has bought the spectrum that Echostar failed to use: the new space race is no longer to get to space, it is to control it

by

Spacex He has bought the Telecommunications spectrum of Echostar for 17,000 million dollars. Thus eliminates its main competitor in direct mobile satellite services. Why is it important. This operation Turn Spacex the great dominator of satellite mobile connectivity. It will no longer compete with land operators, but will control the entire value chain, from the rocket to the phone. Spacex has paid 8.5 billion in cash and another 8.5 billion in shares for the AWS-4 and H-Block spectrum licenses of Echostar. In addition, it will cover additional 2 billion in interest payments of the Echostar debt until November 2027. The movement eliminates the Direct-To-Cell constellation project of Echostar, which had been the main Starlink competitor in satellite mobile services. Charlie Ergen, founder of Echostar, has sold all his spectrum after decades to accumulate it without developing his own network. In Xataka Satellites are becoming some of the luminous objects in heaven. It is a serious problem In detail. Spacex will use these frequencies to Develop your next generation constellation Starlink Direct-to-Cell, which promises “a remarkable change in performance” with respect to the current one. Technology works with existing LTE phones without the need for hardware, firmware or special applications. It currently operates with more than 600 satellites offering 4G coverage to more than six million users on five continents. The backdrop. This purchase arrives just before the Apple event, where the new ones will be presented iPhone 17. There are those who speculate that Apple could reconsider their association with GlobalStar after seeing how Spacex eliminates competitors buying the entire spectrum available. Between the lines. Spacex does not move by investment return to use, but by strategic domain. As you have already done in satellite connectivity by lowering prices aggressively to stop Amazon Kuiper, now it seeks to completely control the satellite mobile market before mature. Yes, but. The new AWS-4 and H-Block frequencies are not compatible with current phones. Spacex will need manufacturers as Apple to include them in future devices. If Apple does not cooperate, Musk has already threatened to create his own “Starlink” phone. {“Videid”: “X8ywtec”, “Autoplay”: False, “Title”: “First video call with Starlink Direct To Cell”, “Tag”: “”, “Duration”: “22”} And now what? This operation leaves competitors as AST Spacemobile in a specially complicated position. AST needs to raise 400 million in the next few weeks just to stay afloat, Spacex already dominates in launch speed and satellite development. The transaction also solves the FCC investigations on Echostar. With this sale and the previous one of another AT&T spectrum package for 23,000 million, Echostar seems to go to a gradual settlement of its operations. Outstanding image | Spacex In Xataka | Spacex has just published unpublished images of the “Rostized” Starship. A unique perspective of his shock after the toughest reentry (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news Spacex has bought the spectrum that Echostar failed to use: the new space race is no longer to get to space, it is to control it It was originally posted in Xataka by Javier Lacort .

If we cannot manufacture chips, we will at least control how they are manufactured

by

The Dutch company ASML has invested 1.3 billion euros in Mistral AIbecoming your greatest shareholder. Far from being another financial operation, reading is that it is Europe trying to control world semiconductor manufacturing. Without manufacturing a single chip. The current situation. ASML already has the absolute monopoly of the extreme ultraviolet lithography machines (EUV)the only ones capable of manufacturing chips of less than 7 nanometers. Without their teams of 180 million dollars, nor TSMC, nor Samsung, nor can they produce advanced semiconductors. Now he also wants to control the software that optimizes those machines. Why is it important. The processes of photolithography They generate data petabytes. A 1% improvement in production yield can use thousands of millions. If Mistral becomes the standard AI to optimize ASML machines, Europe would control both hardware and “brain” that makes it work. This play resolves the current technological trilema: the United States designs the chips, Asia manufactures them. And Europe? Europe could control the tools and processes that make its manufacture possible. The context. TSMC has already begun to use Nvidia to optimize its plants. China develops its own systems. If ASML does not act, its Asian customers will optimize the machines without their participation, turning their technology into a Commodity. With Mistraleach software update would be a reason to maintain the monopoly. And most valuable: they would have access to the most critical manufacturing data in the world. Yes, but. The operation has its risks. Mistral needs Nvidia chips to train its models (irony: use American technology to control world manufacturing). And China could accelerate its efforts of technological independence if you perceive this alliance as a hostile. In addition, going from language models to specialized industrialized is not a triviality. Mistral will need very specific talent, which today works in Google or TSMC. In perspective. This alliance recognizes an uncomfortable reality: Europe has lost the battle of direct chips manufacturing. But you can win the process control war. It is like not knowing how to cook but owns all ovens and recipes. Once the factories optimize their processes with Mistralchanging another system would be extremely expensive. He is a technical lock disguised as a service. The long -term game. Between 2025 and 2027 we will see the integration of Mistral models into the ASML software. By 2030, Europe could have a duo that controls how all the advanced chips in the world are manufactured. In the end this story does not go on chatbots or on generative. It is about using AI as a Trojan horse to insert European dependence on the most critical process of the digital economy. ASML already showed that You can master an industry by controlling a single key point. Now he wants to control two: the hardware and the software that optimizes it. In Xataka | Le chat from Mistral AI: What is it, how it works and what can this artificial intelligence chat done in Europe do Outstanding image |

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.