Mobile Tech & Gadgets

Years ago we ridiculed China for copying Western mobile phones. The fact is that now they copy them… and improve them

by

We Europeans have integrated into our culture that copying is something negative, an act of theft according to tech industry figures such as John Ive. In China, the culture of ‘shanzai’ It tells us the opposite: learning and replicating what the best teachers do is the best way to reach (or surpass) their level of knowledge. In China, the logic is different. The culture of ‘shanzhai’ It starts from a much more pragmatic premise: learning by replicating the best is the fastest—and most effective—way to reach their level, or even surpass it. For years, seeing Chinese brands copying giants like Apple was a source of ridicule on social networks. Until the country’s technological advance has made the outcome inevitable: copies that no longer only imitate, but also technically improve the products from which they are inspired. The Honor Magic 8 Pro…Air. Apple sets the conceptual pace for where industry trends will move. And, although Samsung was the first with its Galaxy Edge, the race to create increasingly thinner flagships has been started by Apple with its iPhone 17 Air. A model that It is not working very well on a commercial level.precisely because of the sacrifices that supposedly entail creating such a thin mobile phone. It only has one camera. It is the iPhone with the worst autonomy of the entire family iPhone 17 It is, in practical terms, inferior in some key aspects to a base iPhone The most talked about mobile phone this week is the Honor Magic 8 Pro Air, of which we have leaks through JD’s own pageand whose presentation date and part of the design are already confirmed by Honor itself. We will meet him on January 19 in China. Don’t take away my basics. “I’m willing to lose two cameras and suffer with the battery in exchange for a thinner phone.” Said nobody, ever. According to the information leaked, this Honor It has three cameras It has a 5,500mAh battery The rest of the specs will be those expected in any high range honor Power 2. The Honor Magic 8 Pro Air will not be the only Honor model “inspired” by Apple for this 2026. Recently, the company presented its Power 2a mid-range with just 8mm thickness and only 216 grams of weight. In addition to having specs that border on the first line, it is practically a humiliation in terms of battery for all its rivals: it has 10,000mAh, the same as the powerbanks that I have at home for my trips. It’s not a player thing. Xiaomi has even renamed its star flagship from Pro to “Pro Max”, in a model in which even the case of an iPhone 17 Pro Max fits almost perfectly. Differences with the Apple model? Battery… 7,500mAh. In less thickness. Screen with more peak brightness. Double the base memory. Three keys. China It is in one of the best moments to lead the smartphone race. The generational leap in batteries is leaving Western manufacturers behind. The maxim is clear: add all the hardware that fits in the body of the phone. A strategy focused on volume. Giants like Apple or Google need to hit the mark with their flagship model to make their mobile division profitable. Chinese manufacturers maintain their profitability thanks to broader catalogs, with dozens of models that cover all price ranges. A market of traditions. The data of Counterpoint in Q3 2025 They make one thing clear: the lack of technological innovation does not affect Samsung or Apple. The two leading companies maintain their position, followed by Xiaomi, which is already practically traditional in markets such as Europe. Despite this, China is demonstrating something key in a market that aspires to win in the coming years. He not only knows how to copy: he knows how to improve what already exists. In Xataka | China has a replica of 12 European cities with Parisian neighborhoods and part of the Alhambra. And it belongs to Huawei

not be the country in Europe with the most unemployment

by

After almost four decades being the European country with one of the worst employment data on the continent, Spain has just witnessed a historic change: Finland has surpassed us as the EU country with the highest unemployment rate in November 2025. According to Eurostat dataFinland recorded an unemployment rate of 10.6%, compared to 10.4% in Spain. The change may seem minuscule (just two tenths), but it is an indicator of something bigger: for the first time since 2013, Spain has stopped occupying first place in this unenviable category. A change of trend. This shift in unemployment figures reflects an interesting paradox. While Spain has improved its labor market figures in recent years, with a sustained drop in unemployment that was only interrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic, Finland has experienced an economic deterioration that has skyrocketed its unemployment. In any case, and despite this change in trend, the figures are not good at all. Both countries remain well above the European Union average, which in November stands at 6.0%, demonstrating that they have a serious structural problem that goes beyond the specific ups and downs. Finland: how a prosperous country has reached the worst unemployment in 15 years. The most striking thing about the Finnish data is the surprising speed of the deterioration of its labor market. The government of the Nordic country implemented reforms a few years ago to reduce public debt, an objective that prioritized job creation. As collected SwissinfoElina Pylkkänen, Undersecretary of State at the Ministry of Employment of Finland, speaking to national television YLEstated that “Increased productivity has been sought by cutting costs, rather than expanding operations and investing.” In November 2025, more than 250,000 people found themselves without work in Finland, a figure that represents the highest unemployment in the country since 2009. A fact that has been aggravated by the approval of a regulation more lax for dismissal. Unemployment improves as measured. Although Finland leads the unemployment rate with the seasonally adjusted data (10.6%), there is an important nuance since Eurostat uses trend data for Finland, not seasonally adjusted, so the situation reflected in these data still needs to be consolidated. If you use the seasonally adjusted unemployment data facilitated by the EU, Spain remains at 10.4% while Finland is at 10.1%. However, the unemployment trend for the third quarter of 2025 It already showed the stagnation of the Finnish labor market and the improvement of employment in Spain. Spain: decades of an unemployment problem that does not end. Spain has not arrived at this situation suddenly either. According to the data from the National Statistics Institute (INE), the unemployment rate in the third quarter of 2025 was 10.45%, which demonstrates the persistence of the problem. During the last 39 consecutive monthsSpain has been the country with the highest unemployment rate in the EU, an undesirable leadership that has remained practically without interruption since 2013. He origin of this problem chronic work it’s complexcombining a high rate of temporary contracts with a more limited level of investment in training. This generates an extreme sensitivity of employment to economic cycles: when the economy slows down, employment is the variable that adjusts most quickly, but falls at the same speed when it slows down. The 2008 crisis exemplified this vulnerability, bringing the Unemployment at historic highs. Although Spain has consistently created jobs since then, unemployment rates remain almost double the European average. That Spain loses a title that it has held for almost four decades does not represent a solution to the problem, but rather the confirmation that another country faces a situation even more complicated. In Xataka | The “Spanishization” of Sweden and Finland: youth unemployment is the key for Spain to stop being the EU unemployment champion Image | Pexels (Bulat369)

China is winning the humanoid robot race. The problem is that this race doesn’t really exist.

by

Fritz Lang wanted to imagine the future and painted it for us with humanoid robots integrated into society. That maschinenmensch of ‘Metrópolis’ (1927) was a preview of what they now pursue with more ambition than anyone Chinese manufacturers, who They have not stopped developing more and more of these robots. They are winning the race by far, but the problem is that the race is non-existent. (Almost) nobody buys humanoid robots. These Chinese manufacturers were by far the most responsible for the sales of humanoid robots, which in 2025 amounted to the figure of… 13,000 units. The data reflects a forceful reality: in the world of domestic humanoid robots there is a lot (a lot) of noise, but few (very few) nuts. More than in 2024 = very little. Humanoid robots from Chinese manufacturers sold much more than those from American companies like Tesla or Figure AI according to data from the consulting firm Omdia. The company that has sold the most according to that report is the Chinese startup Shanghai AgiBot Innovation Technology Co., which distributed a total of 5,168 robots in 2025. It was followed by Unitree Robotics and UBTech Robotics Corp. Although total sales were five times those of 2024, the final figure reflects that the market is in its infancy. Huge expectations. Despite this, Citigroup esteem that in 2050 there will be 648 million humanoid robots. The great hope is that the promising evolution of AI models will serve to overcome current limitations and have multiple practical applications, once integrated into robots. There are already promising developments in this regard, and robots and AIs separately have already demonstrated their capacity in limited environments. like the manufacturing, logistics or customer service. China and “affordable” robotics. Although there are notable companies in this field in the US, their humanoid robots are much more expensive. Elon Musk indicated by the end of 2025 that “once production reaches one million units annually, Optimus will likely be priced between $20,000 and $25,000.” Meanwhile, Unitree already offers “affordable” robots (but not humanoid) for $6,000, and AgiBot asks for $14,000 for his. This company was in fact named by Jensen Huang during his talk at the NVIDIA event at CES 2026. The Chinese government helps. As in other industrial areas, there is strong support from the Chinese government in this area, and according to Bloomberg Favorable policies are combined with aid for the construction of training centers. The number of companies and startups developing this type of solutions already exceeds 150, and that even points to a potential “robotic bubble.” The challenge of robotic hands. One of the great challenges of this segment is to ensure that the dexterity of machines is comparable to that of humans. For now this is not the case especially with the example of robotic hands, which mostly They are very unskilledwhich limits its application to real home environments. The battery life of these robots is another obstacle that can hinder their application in our daily lives. Future implications. If these challenges are overcome, we will once again find ourselves with a disturbing panorama in which geopolitical tensions could make access to these robots difficult. There is also the problem of employment: if robots achieve the ability to perform manual tasks, the threat to virtually any human worker will be notable. How will governments react to this situation? Image | Agibot In Xataka | China prepares its next technological assault. Huawei and UBTech have just teamed up to bring humanoid robots to homes

all for less than 460 euros

by

Within the high range, the Google Pixel have become one of the star models. If you have been thinking about buying a Google smartphone for a while, in the brand’s official store, now you can get the Google Pixel 9a by 459 euros with headphones Buds 2a as a gift (valued at 149 euros). You just have to add the mobile phone to the basket and choose the headphones in the color you want and the pack will appear at that price. Google Pixel 9a + Pixel Buds 2 The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A perfect pack to renew your mobile in 2026 He Google Pixel 9a It is one of the cheapest Google phones that we can find right now. Your screen 6.3 inches It is pOLED type and offers Full HD+ resolution. In addition, it has a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and has Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection. Its brain is the Google Tensor G4 processor (accompanied by the Titan M2 security coprocessor). It comes with 8 GB RAM and 128GB storage internal. Works with Android 15 and operating system updates are guaranteed for seven years. It is a good phone for photos, since it integrates a 13 MP front camera and a rear photographic system made up of a 48 MP main lens and a 13 MP wide angle. Likewise, it has IP68 certification and has Dual SIM. As for the gift headphones (and valued at 149 euros), it can be said that these Google Pixel Buds 2a They are available in lilac or black. They offer active noise cancellation, an autonomy of up to 20 hours and are resistant to sweat and water. Additionally, they come with Gemini serial. Some cases that may interest you for this Google Pixel 9a Natbok Magnetic Case for Google Pixel 9a The price could vary. We earn commission from these links The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Note: some of the links posted here are affiliate links and may provide a profit. Images | Álvaro García (Xataka) and Google In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | The best quality-price mobiles. Their analyzes and videos are here

features, price and technical sheet

by

Mazda had no intention of jumping into the electric car. At least, he didn’t until he saw that the electric car worked for him. The performance of Mazda 6e in china made the company change its mind. With development that had largely fallen on Changan, getting on the electric car bandwagon was easier. If it worked, why not try it in Europe? It is still early to know the real performance of the model but one thing is certain: We already have the Mazda CX-6e with us. The company has presented the electric SUV that will accompany the sedan. Same spirit as its brother but now in SUV format. Mazda CX-6e technical data sheet Mazda CX-6e Body type Five-seater saloon Measurements and weight 4,850 meters long, 1,935 meters wide and 1,620 meters high. Wheelbase of 2,902 meters. Weight to be confirmed Trunk 468 liters. Maximum power 190 kW (258 HP) and 290 Nm. WLTP consumption 18.9 kWh/100 km DGT environmental distinctive Zero emissions. Driving aids (ADAS) Mandatory by the European Union. Others 26 inch screen Head-Up Display. Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility. Electric hybrid. No. Plug-in hybrid. No. Electric Yeah. 78 kWh LFP battery (484 kilometers of autonomy) with 190 kW (258 HP) motor. Price and release Available summer 2026. Price to be confirmed. Why does an electric car have less autonomy than advertised? A 26-inch screen that sums it all up The electric car has become a headache for low-volume companies. Those with the muscle of the Volkswagen group have in their hands the ability to make investments profitable with a multitude of brands but companies like Mazda, with much more discreet sales, They need their shots to be as accurate as possible.. That is why their room for maneuver is narrower and they share developments where it is more difficult to make a car profitable. It is no coincidence that the Mazda 2, a small vehicle with a tighter profit margin, is a Toyota Yaris. And it is also normal that without a clear and decisive embrace from the public for the electric car, the company would resist to launch a new model on the market. However, its association with Changan in China has given it a wild card, an extra ball to test to what extent the public is interested in a Mazda electric car with a minimal investment. In the Asian country, the Mazda 6e was well received and that is why the company has tested it in Europe where it has obtained very good reviews but whose sales performance remains to be seen. The good thing for Mazda is that the risk is minimal. The burden of developing the car has fallen on Changan, who have also released an SUV version of the model in China. Mazda, for its part, has put its design and hallmarks. In fact, he assures that the cars that arrive in Europe are tuned by his engineers. And all that is what we find in the Mazda CX-6e, present at the Brussels Motor Show. On the outside, the Mazda CX-6e is everything we could waitr of a car from the Japanese company. Soft and rounded shapes with sharp headlights and a front lighting grill as we already saw in the sedan. But inside it maintains all the Chinese flavor of its Asian brother. And Mazda breaks with all the patterns that we had seen in the brand with a gigantic 26-inch screen and 5k resolution. Until very recently the company had defended small screens, away from the driver and even without touch functions when driving. Now it comes with a car without an instrument panel that focuses all the information on a panel that goes from driver to co-driver. Mazda says its 26-inch screen does not distract from driving The company ensures that the information can be divided into two clearly differentiated sections for the driver and the passenger, it has voice recognition in nine languages ​​and a Head-Up Display that reproduces the navigation instructions so it offers “complete information without distracting the driver”, in the company’s words. It also has gesture control to navigate through sound functions and skip the use of buttons. Digital buttons, of course, because physicists are conspicuous by their absence. The infotainment panel is compatible with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay and keeps the climate controls close at hand on a lower bar. On the gigantic screen you can control all driving assistance functions such as emergency braking systems, lane departure prevention systems or adaptive cruise control. The interior will have synthetic leather upholstery that will be available in three colors (beige, black and an amethyst and white combination, depending on the finish chosen). In addition, it is expected that, as with the sedan, it will have great interior habitability. The trunk is 468 liters. Regarding the battery, The Mazda 6e arrived with two battery capacities. On this occasion, Mazda will only offer one with the Mazda CX-6e in a combination that, if the sedan’s consumption is maintained, can give very good results. Thus, the car arrives equipped with 78 kWh LFP battery and a 190 kW (258 HP) engine that promises 484 km of autonomy according to the WLTP cycle. In the saloon, charging power was one of the car’s weaknesses. In the SUV, it comes with a good 195 kW of peak power when recharging, promising to go from 10% to 80% in 24 minutes. In this way, it is expected that with a recharge of just over 20 minutes the car will have between 300 and 350 real kilometers available before the next stop. Photos | Mazda In Xataka | I bought this car for a simple reason: I’m tired of giant screens

The CEO of Ryanair is clear about how he would govern a country. We are lucky that it doesn’t.

by

Michael O’Leary has spent decades building a reputation based on provocation and irreverence. The CEO of Ryanair has not only built Europe’s largest low-cost airline based on surcharges on your services and open confrontation with clients, unions and regulators. He has also turned each interview into a showcase of extreme opinions that rarely leave anyone indifferent. The last of them, granted to the Financial Timesis especially revealing. In it, O’Leary explains bluntly how he would run a country if he had the chance. To no one’s surprise, his approach is not too far from what has been applying for years at Ryanair: treat everything as a balance of results, eliminate what is considered “inefficient” and assume political wear and tear as inevitable collateral damage. Govern a country as if it were Ryanair. O’Leary doesn’t hesitate when asked about his vision of power. As he explains, if he had to govern a country he would do it exactly the same as his airline. Aggressively cutting public spending and, especially, social benefits. “I would run it like Ryanair, I would cut it big… I would cut benefits big. Get a job!” he says without nuance in the interview. Even when he recognizes that there are people who cannot work, his conclusion remains the same and he would not hesitate to reduce this aid. “Are there people who cannot work at all? Yes, but it would also cut their benefits,” said the controversial manager, who maintains an extreme vision of the minimum State, where the social protection network is perceived more as a cost than as a collective investment. Millionaire politicians to attract talent. The most striking part of the interview comes when O’Leary addresses salary of the politicians. There are no cuts on the horizon. For the Irish manager, one of the big problems in current politics is the lack of talent, and the solution is to pay politicians as if they were senior managers. His idea is that “If you are prime minister or a minister, you should earn at least one million pounds a year”, which is equivalent to 1,152,900 euros at the exchange rate. Very far from the 93,145.20 euros that are assigned as salary to the President of the Government in Spain, or 182,400 euros gross per year who receives the President of the Republic in France. “Politicians must be paid much better, although saying so is political suicide,” giving Singapore as an example, where senior public officials receive very high salaries to attract the most talented profiles in the private sector to politics and reduce incentives for corruption. Zero personal affinity with Trump. O’Leary’s interview Financial Times It also leaves room for his relationship with Donald Trump. O’Leary recounts a direct call from the then-candidate in 2016, in which Trump insisted for almost an hour on increase flights from Ryanair to airports close to its golf courses in Scotland and Ireland. The current president of the United States even offered him accommodation in one of his hotels. O’Leary’s response to Trump’s offer was to avoid at all costs approaching any politician. “No, no way. It’s not my style,” the executive concluded, making it clear that personal harmony with Trump never existed, although both share a very similar vision of the world as a place where everything is negotiated. The same approach you apply to your passengers. O’Leary’s ideas on how to govern are consistent with the decisions he has made at Ryanair during the years who runs Ryanair. From defending the charge for using the bathroom on board to imposing increasingly complex surcharges for luggage or boarding passes. Everything responds to one income maximization logic and reduce costs, even if that means a more hostile experience for the customer. Their inflexibility with refunds is another example. In the interview he remembers the case of a passenger stabbed in an attack on a train in the United Kingdom who tried to cancel a flightbut did not obtain a refund for the ticket. “If the company had offered him one, the doors would have been opened to other demands for reimbursement,” said O’Leary, for whom the company’s efficiency and profitability always come before empathy. An old idea with dubious results. The proposal to manage a country as if it were a company is neither new nor exclusive to O’Leary. Elon Musk already defended openly that approach from the DOGE who led in the first months of the Trump administration. The result was especially negative for the cooperation policy and the operation of the US administration. Trump himself has applied this logic of business negotiation to international and economic policy with the imposition of tariffs as a negotiation weapon. The results, at least so far, do not seem to be giving the best fruits for the United States economy. In Xataka | When Ryanair CEO went to a restaurant he was charged for two extras: “priority seating” and “legroom” Image | Flickr (Polish presidency of the Council of the EU 2025)

The DGT is not going to fine for the V-16 beacons at the moment, and therein lies the key

by

Since last January 1, anyone who is stranded on the road due to a breakdown has to place the V-16 beacon connected. And what happens if I don’t have it? Absolutely nothing. At least that is what the Government assures. Because, with the law in hand, the agents can fine us if they consider it appropriate. We also don’t know how long this “truce” will last. “It is not tax collection”. This is what Fernando Grande-Marlaska stated in the press conference in which he gave the results of the road accidents relating to 2025. The DGT has made public the accident data for last year but a good part of the press conference has revolved around the topic of the moment: the connected V-16 beacon that the DGT has been required to carry since last January 1. The agents, Grande-Marlaska assures, will not fine for a “reasonable” period of time, in words reported by The World. They do it because, they say, “our objective is not sanctioning or collecting, what moves us is the obligation to save lives.” “Reasonable”. It is the temporary measure that the Minister of the Interior has used to refer to the time that the agents have before fining. The word says nothing because, really, from January 1, 2026, Traffic can fine us for not having the corresponding signage elements. The fine is 80 euros and it does not take into account whether we carry the triangles with us because the only essential element in the car when signaling an accident is the connected V16 beacon, which must be approved by the DGT. And the triangles have been left in a kind of limbo so that the driver can do with them whatever he considers. Not now. The position of the DGT has changed over time. Since it was confirmed that the V-16 beacon would be the only signaling element of a road breakdown, the discourse has changed and its position has been relaxed. At first it was argued that the use of triangles could be grounds for a fine since an incident was not being correctly signalled. Now, Interior says that there will be a period in which fines will not be imposed for this. Later it was left up in the air whether the beacon+triangle combination was valid. Finally, it will be allowed put the triangles “at your own risk”. many doubts. In his speech, Grande-Marlaska pointed out that last year more than 100 people died on the road, “a significant number for getting off to put up the triangles”, in words reported by Motorpassion. In The World They point out that estimates point to 25 pedestrians dying while trying to put the triangles in what Grande-Marlaska describes as “bleeding.” However, as we have said in Xatakathe DGT has never offered clarifying data. Traffic has always classified these victims as people run over “after getting out of the vehicle” but without clarifying under what circumstances. They do not indicate whether they were hit when getting out of the car, putting the triangles on, changing a tire on the shoulder or waiting for help to arrive. According to their accounts, between 2018 and 2022 (a period that includes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic), an annual average of between 18 and 26 people died in accidents “after getting off the vehicle” on high-capacity roads. as reflected in the document itself which explains why the regulations and technical requirements of this connected V-16 beacon are changed. Taking the total number of deaths in this entire series (8,615 people, according to data from Statista), we are talking about just over 1% of deaths that fall into the category “after getting out of the vehicle.” No fines but no extensions. The result in the application of the measure has been paradoxical. From the Interior they say that the measure is “essential” to reduce the number of road accidents but omitting its use or not having the beacon will not be penalized despite there being no extension. And, at the same time, Traffic defends that it has not implemented an extension because it is something that has been known since 2023 and that we should have already purchased the device. According to Pere Navarrodirector of the DGT, “we considered delaying it” but that “would not have changed anything.” Also left to the driver’s discretion whether or not they want to put the triangles in despite the fact that they consider it a sufficient risk to promote a regulatory change. And they recognize that something has been done wrong with the communication of the new measure. Photo | DGT and Help Flash In Xataka | The V-16 beacon business: who is making money with the elimination of the DGT triangles

What are they and how do they affect the maximum speed on highways and highways?

by

Let’s explain to you what are dynamic speed limits on highways and highways. Because no, the speed limits are not going to change forever nor are we going to say goodbye to 120 km/h, but in some sections the maximum at which you can drive will depend on each moment. Therefore, taking into account everything that is being said and exaggerated, we are going to try to explain to you how this type of speed limits works. Just remember that At the moment they have only been implemented in some sections of specific roads, not on all highways and expressways. What are dynamic speed limits? Highways and expressways have a speed limit of 120 kilometers per hour. But when a section of road tends to have a lot of traffic or complications on a regular basis, or simply when the weather and visibility are poor, then these static limits can even become dangerous, because people tend to go faster than they should. For these cases, the DGT is beginning to implement a technology that has already been satisfactorily tested in countries such as Germany or France, managing to reduce accidents in high traffic areas. It is about the dynamic speed limitswhich will vary depending on the conditions at any given time. This technology uses artificial intelligence to record and process traffic or weather data in real time, and will take into account visibility, peak times, times and incidents that occur. With all this, The speed limit will be adjusted automatically taking into account the situation at all times. In the sections where it is implemented, the speed limit will be displayed on the illuminated panels on the roads. Thus, if the conditions are not bad, this system will at specific times reduce the speed limit from 120 km/h to 100, 90 or even 80 km/h. For example, if it is very foggy this morning, perhaps the limit is 120 to 80 km/h to avoid accidents. That limit to which it is lowered will be the legal one at the moment in which it is posted, so speeding will have fines which can range between 100 and 600 euros and between 2 and 6 license points. Come on, it doesn’t matter if you’re on a stretch of highway, if it says the limit is 80 right now, that’s how it is. For now, These dynamic limits have only been applied to one trackwhich is the AP-7, in one of its sections in Catalonia. Taking into account that it is a system that works satisfactorily in other European countries, if the bet goes well in this area, it would not be ruled out that it be implemented in others. Cover image | Jorge Franganillo In Xataka Basics | DGT express fines: what they are and how this new system works to notify violations in 48 hours

I have tried to buy one of the 7 euro Renfe tickets. And Renfe has done Renfe’s

by

January 8 in Madrid. A cold that cuts the face. Traffic jams everywhere with the children returning to school. Back to normal, to the office. To the computer. Depression. We Madrid residents need few excuses to flee the city. Perhaps that is why the Renfe discounts sounded like a swan song. Beach and paella. It almost doesn’t matter if it’s in May, April or the next weekend in January. Aware that It would be almost impossible get a ticket at that price, I missed the opportunity to avoid unwanted frustrations. Let’s try tomorrow, see if… And here I am, hooked on the Renfe website, with thousands of people ahead of me in a virtual queue that leads nowhere. I was looking for a relaxing weekend. An appetizer to put in my mouth during this return to routine. And right now I feel like I’m in line at Doña Manolita on December 21, two kilometers from the door and 20 minutes until the lottery administration closes. Seven euros (or many more) And well, here we are. I go to the Renfe website. I select the offer that promises tickets for seven euros. And we have to wait. Seven minutes and just over 3,000 people. It could be worse, I think. Much worse, in fact, because since yesterday the website has been crashing. Of course, They are not the more than 166,000 people which my colleague Javier Pastor encountered in April 2022. Then the tickets cost 15 euros and there were 100,000 seats available to buy in three days. This time Renfe The number of seats has not been made public. but it has confirmed that the reduction with seven euro bills will be active until January 18. I think that with ten days of margin, the volume of people who aspire to buy their ticket will be somewhat lower. Time, in fact, seems to be working in my favor. The minutes are falling. A little slower than what is stated on the sign above but just over 10 minutes after logging in, Renfe confirms that I have started the purchase process. According to them, it should have been on the platform for a couple of minutes. I therefore have 18 minutes left. Or I should wear them. Because I confirm that I want to access the site as soon as possible. “Yes please”. The screen refreshes. Another minute has passed. We have 17 minutes left. “Yes please”. Wow, it seems that my turn has expired despite having waited patiently and confirmed all the steps without leaving the active tab (whatever might happen). And here we are, starting the whole process again. Again seven minutes ahead and more than 3,000 people in the virtual queue. My paella is starting to choke. Again, same screen: “Yes, please” This time yes. This time it seems that I have been able to access the platform. Obviously, the tickets are not as I expected. I sail between weekends. The only seven euro tickets on a Friday are those that leave at 6:30 am. I discard that option because I have the bad habit of working on Fridays. I choose to leave on Saturday at that same time. The relaxing weekend starts with an early morning, but hey, we’ll disconnect until Sunday night. But to return on Sunday night there are no offers. Accepting that I will have to spend more than 14 euros to go and return, I stretch the gum to the maximum. I tell myself “I’ll take Friday off on vacation but I’ll take full advantage of the weekend.” I’m going to June. I select departure at seven euros at 6:30 in the morning. But dynamic prices have done their thing. Returning on Sunday at the last minute will cost me over 60 euros. There are no longer even weekends at bargain prices. And assuming that hotels will be much more expensive, I return to the month of January. I think that going for seven euros and returning for 35 euros from Valencia is not bad at all. I have already taken the bait of compulsive buying and I’m not willing to let go. I select the departure on Saturday at 6:30 in the morning. I eat that paella. I select the return after 9:00 p.m. I’ll see what I do until that time, Alberto’s problem from the future. Mech. Mistake. Yes, I have selected the one-way ticket but Renfe tells me no. I refresh and go back. I select the idea again. I select the return. Now, I go one step further. It remains to fill in the traveler’s information and pay. I would like to do it but At this point the website freezes. It starts to malfunction. The scrolling is jerky and it is impossible to press any button. I can’t fill out the form. It won’t let me change the email. Of course, it doesn’t let me go to the payment platform. Soda. I have 4245 people in front of me. Photos | Renfe and Xataka In Xataka | Renfe is obliged to compensate for delays of more than 15 minutes starting January 1. The Government wants to prevent it

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.