This is how the trenches from the First World War are preserved today

The veins of Europe had opened from north to south in 1914. After the outbreak of World War I, both Allied forces and German troops built a sophisticated and unprecedented network of trenches which extended from the coasts of the North Sea to the border with Switzerland. At that time, it was possible to cross the continent from end to end without setting foot on the surface once. One hundred years after the first large-scale modern war, what remains of all that? Bit. But there are still some vestiges that are worth visiting if you want to experience first-hand what the heavy, hellish existence of the soldiers on the Western Front was like. One of the best preserved trenches in Europe is located in Belgium, near the city of Ypres. There, among the still spectral forests of northern Flanders, The trenches on Hill 60 remain almost in their original condition.one of the many strategic fortified points built by British troops throughout their four years of fighting against German troops. A historical vestige. The place is known as Sanctuary Woodthe Sanctuary Forest. Religious reminiscence may make sense today, given that a memorial dedicated to those who fell during the First World War is located here. Between 1914 and 1918, however, Hill 60 was one of the most mundane and earthly, bloody and brutal, places history has known. Ypresdue to its relevant strategic position, was the scene of some of the worst battles of the war. And from these trenches, fierce disputes were fought to gain just a handful of kilometers of front. After the end of the war, farmers in the area recovered the lost land, returning to farming and putting aside the horrible memory of the battle. Not everything, of course: large areas of Belgium and France were constricted inside “the red zone”areas so contaminated by shrapnel and explosives that they were unusable for human life for centuries. Despite this, most of the trenches were dismantled or buried due to renewed farming and livestock activity. Sanctuary Wood It was maintained, however, over the years, and today serves as a living museum of the Great War. They had bunkers to protect soldiers from artillery attacks. (Image: Amanda Slater) Barbed wire was the first line of defense of any trench. (Image: Amanda Slater) Sinuous and complex, the trenches were small, almost underground cities. (Image: Amanda Slater) Mud was another enemy that the soldiers had to deal with almost constantly. In the Belgian plains, low and frequently flooded by rain, mud was everywhere. (Image: Amanda Slater) The trenches could be over two meters high. (Image: Amanda Slater) A conflict that would mark the world as we know it today, and that changed war forever. In Flandersin the north of Belgium, in places like these trenches, the war mutated. From variable fronts we moved to stable fronts, where soldiers lived for months waiting for news from the front. The trenches were unapproachable, but his life was far from peaceful. They were subjected to constant artillery sieges, which undermined morale and were mentally unsettling. One of the most reliable accounts of the time was written by Erich María Remarque, a German author who fought on the front during much of the war. All quiet on the front tells the daily life of soldiers in the trenchoften misunderstood. The soldiers rotated in the different trench lines: they spent a couple of weeks or three on the front line, returned to the rear, where they rested and recovered, and little by little they regained guard or front positions. Its role was cyclical. Meanwhile, they lived in these trenches. They were unhealthy places and subject to constant pressure from artillery, which forced soldiers to crowd into bunkers where rats, canned goods and mud piled up. The constant rains and the destruction of the territory resulting from the loads of artillery They left a muddy, lunatic landscape of demolished trees and small towns reduced to ruins and ashes. The trenches were authentic underground cities. The ones shown in the photos are worse than those the Germans enjoyed. While the British were dirty and poorly built, the German ones were much more comfortable and healthy. The Allied command never thought that the war would last so long, so they never worried about setting them up correctly to accommodate their soldiers. The Germans, however, quickly understood that the front would be static and that the trenches would be key. In Sanctuary Wood, trenches were sandwiched between trees. (Image: Jeremy) Craters are still visible on part of the former western front. (Image: Colorgrind) Another crater caused by heavy German artillery. (Image: Colorgrind) Trenches were often built with poor quality materials. More images of craters. Sanctuary Wood, in the middle of the war. A proof of the immobility of the front: in the battle of the sommeBritish offensive carried out during 1917 on the German northern front, near Ypres and in the heart of Flanders, More than 600,000 allied soldiers died. A gigantic figure for a meager, ridiculous loot: after the operations, the Germans had only retreated nine kilometers. The trenches shown here were easily defendable, and offensives resulted in soldiers running unprotected against large-caliber machine guns that wreaked havoc on enemy lines. Ypres perhaps witnessed the worst fighting. Sanctuary Wood is a perfect example of this. Furthermore, it magnificently illustrates the poor living conditions of the soldiers. An ideal look at the First World War one hundred years after it took place. Image | Image: Jeremy In Xataka | In 1955, the United Kingdom stole the “most isolated” islet in the world from the USSR. Today is a huge headache In Xataka | From horse to tank, from balloon to airplane: this is how the First World War revolutionized the art of killing forever

reviewing the best cars and raffle for five MediaMarkt gift cards

We don’t stop, in Xataka we don’t stop. If just a few hours ago we were with Xataka Live, today the Special Week begins Xataka NordVPN Awards 2025. And what does it consist of? Well, while we wait for the gala to arrive on November 20, we are going to warm up our engines meeting the finalists of the different categories. Today is the first program and we are going to focus on two of the most disputed: the best hybrid and electric cars. Today’s program, November 13, will start at 4:00 p.m. Spanish peninsular time on our Twitch channel. It will be presented by Ana Boria (@ana_borbuj) and Angela Blanco (@angelablancof); but they will not be alone. During these programs we are always accompanied by an in-house editor specialized in the subject. Today we are talking about cars, so that person could not be other than Alberto de la Torre. And if this were not enough, we have a brutal and super timely giveaway. Because? Because Black Friday is just around the corner and we are going to raffle five gift cards of 50 euros each from MediaMarkt. We tell you everything. A review of the best cars of 2025 Before starting the program, it is important to remember how the finalists are chosen. In recent weeks, we have shared various forms where you, the xatakeros, have voted for your favorite devices. These votes have been responsible for defining the finalists. In addition, those same votes will be added to those of the jury, which is made up of editors from Xataka and colleagues from other media specialized in technology. Thus, together we will choose the winners who will be announced during the gala. That said, today it’s time to talk about cars. In the Xataka NordVPN 2025 awards we have two categories: the best technological electric cars and the best technological hybrid cars. You can see the candidates here and here You have the vehicles that the xatakeros have chosen as finalists. Today, with Alberto, we will get to know them better. You still have time to get your tickets for the gala Xataka NordVPN Awards 2025 on November 20 in Madrid! Join us and discover the best technological products of the year in a free event full of gadgets, humor and surprises. Advice offered by the brand How to get five 50 euro MediaMarkt gift cards In addition to learning about these two categories from Alberto, during today’s program (and all those to come) we will raffle five 50 euro gift cards from MediaMarkt. With Black Friday just around the corner, this prize is going to come as no surprise. How are they obtained? Participating in our giveaway. During today’s program we will ask a question. The first ten people to answer correctly in the Twitch chat will be assigned a number from one to ten and will advance to the second round. In this one, our presenters will draw five random numbers from a bag. The entries corresponding to that number will win the prize. Five winners and five substitutes will be selected. If any of the winners do not meet the requirements, they will be moved to the first alternate. If this one does not comply either, the second one will be resorted to, and so on. The winner will be chosen live and must contact Xataka through a whisper in the Twitch chat. In addition, the winner must be over 18 years old and resident in Spain. The legal bases can be found at this link. This content is a collaboration and sponsorship between Xataka and the brand, but there is no agreement on the script or the selection of the topics. The editorial content is created entirely by Xataka.

Duolingo was the fun, brave company we loved that taught us languages. Today it is sinking in the stock market

Most people never manage to turn their ideas into business successes. Luis von Ahn (Guatemala City, 1978) has achieved it twice. The first, when he created reCAPTCHA and sold it to Google in 2009 for a small fortune. The second, years later, started from a much simpler concept. Learning languages ​​was a painso von Ahn wanted to turn that into just the opposite: something fun. This is how it was born Duolingoa company that taught how to speak languages ​​with a strong component of gamification. You already had to go to an academy or spend long periods of time in online courses: you could learn words, phrases and pronunciation through small tests when you were on the bus or waiting in a queue. Duolingo achieved the most difficult thing: making us like each other (and fall in love) Learning with Duolingo was fun and comforting. The small rewards worked and turned it almost into a video game that little by little more people became fond of. The snowball got bigger and bigger and Duolingo became one of those companies that already seemed likeable at first. It seemed that everything it did was done well, and little by little the company took important steps to become the giant it is today. The certifications arrived who wanted to rival the famous TOEFL exams, their platform for schools, and more and more languages. Some, like japanesewere a challenge. Others, like the Klingon or the high valyriumwere above all a diversion that consolidated the fun and cool image of the company. Then things started to get interesting because Duolingo wanted to not only teach us languages ​​to speak, but also programming languages. He was encouraged to want to serve as a tool so that the little ones They learned to read and write. And for the young and not so young, Duolingo wanted to become private mathematics teacherof music or even chess. All of this ensured that over the years Duolingo managed to solidify that company image that Not only did he solve real problems, but he did it in a friendly, friendly and fun way.. In 2021 the company decided go public and after a couple of relatively calm years, the shares began to rise in value significantly. Everything seemed to be going great for the company. And then everything went wrong. AI has mortally wounded Duolingo, but not because of what we think When OpenAI presented GPT-4o in June 2024, many of us saw the future. One in which you no longer typed on your computer or on your mobile screen: it was enough to talk to him. That promised to transform many segments and kill some others, and among those threatened were companies like Duolingo. At the time it wasn’t so obvious, but when we saw that kid solving a math problem With the help of AI, it was not difficult to imagine that education, as we had known it, could have an expiration date. Curiously, that didn’t seem to affect Duolingo too much. The company continued to grow, but then two things happened. First and foremost, a major blunder. Luis von Ahn advertisement in April an “AI First” vision in which I would bet on artificial intelligence as a new great tool for your growth. The message sounded like “let’s do without the human being,” and although von Ahn tried to clarify things, the damage was done. After that, the debacle. Duolingo shares began to plummet. But the thing didn’t end there. The second of those turning point events occurred in August, when GPT-5 demonstrated that one could build a custom Duolingo for, for example, learn french in a fun way. People stopped being in love with Duolingo and they began to criticize her precisely because of what had made her succeed. There was too much gamification and, as i said a user on Reddit, “for me the reward for learning a language is learning the language.” Source: Cinco Días. Stocks continued to fall almost steadily. These days Duolingo presented financial results, and the curious thing is that although they were good, they were not good enough for Wall Street. The firm reached 135 million active monthly users (50 million use it daily), 20% more than in the same period of the previous year. It also rose 34% in paying users. Although one would think those numbers were fantastic, they also warned that the forecasts for the fourth quarter were not so optimistic. Result: new stock market debacle. So much so that the shares have plummeted 64% since reaching their highs on May 1, just after the “AI First” announcement. Since then, Duolingo’s drift has been worrying, and the coming months will undoubtedly mark its future even more. The company is in a difficult moment, and the rise of AI may end up causing those experimenting with their chatbot to realize that starting to learn languages ​​​​is as easy as telling ChatGPT “I want to practice my English with you a little. Correct me when I say something else and suggest small exercises” out loud. That is the great challenge for Duolingo going forward. In Xataka | How to practice languages ​​using artificial intelligence

Madrid has so many tourists that a company tried to do business with paid bathrooms. Now it has entered bankruptcy

The news revealed it in February Antonio Giraldo, geographer, urban planner and PSOE councilor in the Madrid City Council. In a tweet that ended up going viral told how a commercial ground floor in the city center that had once housed a bank branch was living a second life as a private bathroom. It might seem like a curiosity without much significance, but that ‘transmutation’ says a lot about Madrid and the tourism that other destinations in Spain experience. Now the toilets are back in the news, but for a very different reason: although Madrid tourism moves in record numbersthe business hasn’t taken off. Where I said bench, I say bathroom. To understand the controversy we have to go back a few months, to February 5, the day Giraldo published the tweet in which he warned of the change of use of a ground floor located in the heart of Madrid, to be more precise in the Plaza de San Miguel, near the Plaza Mayor. The space, which had once housed a bank branch, had been converted into private bathrooms. And to demonstrate it Giraldo included several photographs in which you could see the window with a huge ‘WC’ logo and the access to the new business, with automatic turnstile, lights, fence and card reader included. Click on the image to go to the tweet. “The tourism uncontrolled from the center”. Is it news that a commercial premises changes its use, that they open private bathrooms in the center of Madrid? The answer is yes. It may seem like a curiosity, but the change represents a much deeper and broader transformation: the loss of services aimed at residents in favor of others focused on passing customers, such as tourists. From BBVA office to private toilet that is accessed after payment by card. “The phenomenon of uncontrolled touristification in the center of Madrid brings us something new: a traditional commercial premises transformed into private toilets at a cost of one euro that you pay with a card at an entrance turnstile,” I was reflecting. “If the ultra-pressure that tourists put on public services, such as public bathrooms, is not passed on via a tax, ignore the fact that the private sector is already arriving.” Private bathrooms and much more. In reality, private toilets were just one piece of a much larger phenomenon. The residents of the Plaza de San Miguel may have seen how a commercial ground floor was converted into a paid toilet instead of hosting a pharmacy, fruit shop, shoe store, a supermarket or any other neighborhood business, but something similar has happened in other areas of the city with establishments clearly oriented towards tourism, such as slogans, accommodations or souvenir shops. It is nothing strange or exclusive to the capital. Not long ago in Santiago de Compostela they did the math and they discovered that in the historic center it is now easier to buy a souvenir than a loaf of bread. Another clear example Malaga leaves it. Over there a report of the City Council warns that “mass tourism can lead to the proliferation of low-quality gastronomic establishments” and points out the risks entailed by “the expulsion of native and value-added businesses, replaced by souvenir shops and other businesses for tourists.” A business not so business? The news about the private bathrooms in the center of Madrid could have stopped there, in another example of urban tourism. A few days ago, however, he once again made another headline, in this case in an information advanced by The Confidential: although Madrid has reached a record of overnight stays by foreign tourists, paying toilets have turned out to be less business than was believed. According to reveals the newspaper, the company behind it, The Mad Toilets, has filed bankruptcy proceedings overwhelmed by the losses. The news is even more interesting because initially the project was linked to Victor de Aldamaa businessman associated with such controversial episodes as the Ábalos case wave hydrocarbon plot. Political issues aside, The Confidential explains that the company presented the special procedure for microenterprises before the commercial court, suffocated by the accounts. In court they declared the opening of the special liquidation procedure and the company’s attorney opted for a continuation process. Now a Madrid firm specialized in restructuring has been chosen. Is there anything else known about the firm? Yes. According to the data sent to the court, the company found itself with losses that made its continuity unfeasible: the turnover was zero while the liabilities exceeded 750,000 euros. Consequently, the judge opted for the special procedure for liquidating the microenterprise. On the Empresite platform can be seen that its current status is that of competition. To provide the service, the company had four workers who were in charge of cleaning and supervision, for example. In its day, the premises were equipped with individual cubicles, paper dispensers, sinks and dryers. Searching for the causes. The question at this point is… Why didn’t the project work? Why has it not managed to become a profitable business in the midst of a tourism boom? From the outset, the place had a significant handicap: not far from there, a few minutes walk, there is public toilets that are part of the 129 WC network free access whose maintenance, clarifies the City Councilis paid for with advertising. Added to this competition is that exercised by other businesses such as cafes, bars and restaurants available to tourists. To access the private toilets it was necessary to pay one euro by card and the service was not available 24 hours a day either. In February elDiario explained that the business was operating with a provisional schedule, although the objective was to operate from nine in the morning to twelve at night. To do this, however, an employee explained, more staff would be necessary. In a post Published on LinkedIn, Esteban Mancuso points out that and some other key that explain what happened. Specifically speaks of an “underestimation of real … Read more

How to create presentations in Gemini from a document using a single prompt

Let’s tell you how to create presentations with a single prompt wearing Gemini. This is a function with which you only have to add a document, and then ask the artificial intelligence to make the presentation based on the content of the file you are using. This feature is available to all users, both for free and paid. Of course, the result will always depend on the content of the document, its structure and its quality. The more complete and longer the document, the better the result will be. Create presentations with Gemini The first thing you should do is upload the file you want to use as a reference to create the presentation. You can do this by uploading the file from your computer or mobile, or linking it directly from Google Drive. Now, having the simple document, you have to add a prompt asking you to generate the presentation. You will then send this command along with the attached file. The one you can use is the following: “I am giving you this document. I want you to make a presentation to me with it.” Gemini will now take a few minutes to extract the information from the document, and will generate a presentation with several slides. The images will depend on the ones you have in the document, as well as all the content. Once you have the presentation created, you will have options to export or download it. If you export the document, it will go to your Drive as a Slides document, which is Google’s PowerPoint. And if you download it you will do so in a compatible format. In Xataka Basics | The best prompts to save hours of work and do your tasks with ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

In Ukraine, the difficult thing is not to replace a drone, but its pilot. So Russia has started the hunt with something unprecedented: Rubikon

For two years, Ukrainian drone operators had managed to maintain a decisive tactical advantage: the ability to detect, harass and destroy Russian positions with an agility that Moscow could not match. Pilots worked in small teams, in makeshift basements or camouflaged trenches, piloting from a distance FPV that turned the front into a transparent space where the enemy could rarely move unobserved. All that has changed with an appearance. The dark turn. Yes, that domain has been abruptly broken with the appearance Rubikona Russian unit created to track, locate and eliminate not so much drones as to those who operate them. The testimony in the financial times by Dmytro, a Ukrainian pilot and former rapper, summarizes this change of era: he went from being a hunter to being hunted in seconds when a Russian drone detected him on a reckless walk. That moment, which two years ago would have been exceptional, has become part of the daily routine on a front where the survival of the operator has become a strategic objective for Russia and a critical weak point for Ukraine. The result is a complete investment of roles: Innovators, previously almost untouchable, are now a priority target. Rubikon structure and ambition. This Russian elite corps is not simply a drone unit, but an organization of about 5,000 troops endowed with ample financial resources, tactical autonomy and a defined mission: deny Ukraine the ability to operate its drone network. Unlike the heavily bureaucratic operation that characterized the Russian army in the early stages of the war, this unit acts with speed, initiative and an approach more reminiscent of the Ukrainian groups it seeks to destroy. Their main task is not to attack the infantry on the front line, but penetrate behind the frontup to 10 kilometers in depth, to destroy logistics vehicles, ground robots and, above all, locate the operators who control the Ukrainian defensive swarms. Emblem of the elite Russian unit And much more. For Russian and Western experts, Rubikon functions as a development center of unmanned systems: trains other units, analyzes tactics, refines procedures and continually adapts its way of operating. Each technical or doctrinal improvement that emerges from Rubikon ends up radiating to the rest of the Russian army, which explains why the Ukrainians detect unexpected qualitative leaps in the performance of enemy drones. This ability fast learning It is one of the most disturbing elements, because it allows Russia to correct in months the technological gap that Ukraine built for years. The new invisible dimension. The combat is no longer limited to the visible sky, but is fought in a domain more abstract and lethal: the electromagnetic spectrum. Both Ukraine and Russia deploy electronic intelligence stations, signal guidance equipment and jamming systems capable of defeating, jamming or even hijacking adversary drones. This rivalry makes any radio broadcast a potential risk. Operators, no matter how hidden, need clear lines of sight, elevated antennas, and transmitters relatively close to the front, factors that Rubicon systematically explodes. Their teams track antennas on hills, thermal shadows in forests and emissions that reveal the presence of a pilot a few kilometers away. Andrey Belousov inspecting the Rubikon unit The signs. The inhibitorsdespite their usefulness, generate visible electrical signatures that can attract attacks. And in the midst of these maneuvers, both sides resort to signal hacking video to observe enemy cameras or locate the exact source of a remote control. Expert Tom Withington resume this complexity with a precise image: it is a game of cat and mouse where physics dictates the rules, and where each action leaves a trace that the opponent can exploit. Pressure on the pilots. Plus: unlike the Russians, Ukraine lacks the necessary troops to maintain continuous shiftswhich creates physical and psychological exhaustion that becomes as dangerous as the enemy itself. Zoommer, a Ukrainian soldier from a small drone unit, explained in the Times that Rubikon can operate without breaks because it has enough staff to rotate every few hours, while they must remain alert almost all day. The arrival of this unit to Pokrovsk area (a city that has been in a desperate defensive struggle for a year) has transformed life on the front, going from manageable days to a constant tension in which any movement can mean death. Before, says Zoommer.the area was almost “a vacation”, now it is an invisible hell where every antenna, every fleeting signal and every movement outside the trench can be a fatal mistake. This pressure has forced the Ukrainians to change routines, camouflage positions with extreme care, hide transmitters, disperse equipment and create anti-drone cells that act as a defensive mirror of Russia’s own tactics. The loss of transparency. Drones had provided Ukraine with a crucial tool: the ability to see and hit farther and faster, giving its defenders situational transparency that compensated for numerical inferiority. According to the RUSI analysisup to 80% of current casualties are attributed to drone operations, underscoring their central role in a war in which artillery and infantry depend on these mechanical eyes. What’s happening? Than Rubikon and the like have eroded that advantage in forcing Ukraine to reallocate resources from offensive missions to the protection of its own operators. The result is that, while Russia advances at an increasing pace, Ukraine devotes more efforts to stopping than hitting, losing the initiative at a critical moment in the conflict. Moscow has quickly absorbed the enemy’s lessons and turned them into doctrine, a process that would normally take years and that here has been compressed into months, tipping the balance on an increasingly dynamic front. Psychological warfare. The latest analysis show that the front is no longer defined only by the technology deployed, but by psychological pressure endured by Ukrainian operators and by the transformation of the Russian army towards a more agile structure, represented in Rubikon. The pilots, who have become priority objectives, live under constant tension that forces them to minimize any movement and operate with the permanent feeling of being watched, because … Read more

The PC had been gaining ground on consoles for years. Steam Machine is directly a meteorite to extinguish them

What has been rumored around Valve for a long time has happened. No no ‘Half Life 3‘, but the return of Steam Machines. It was something that had been circulating for a while, but yesterday seemed like the day and Valve did not disappoint. They presented a new Steam Controller (with looks better than the first), the Steam Frame glasses and the cherry on top for many: its new Steam Machine. Its appearance is that of a Xbox Series Xbut flatter, and it is not only that it has all the external appearance of being a console, but that it aims to be the device that, finally, presents the PC as a serious threat to the console segment. Your argument? Which has the ease of use of a console, but also the versatility of a PC. We are not going to go into detail about its characteristics because we have already told everything there is to know about the inside of the Steam Machine and it is already estimated that its performance would be similar to that of a PS5. What I am going to do is theorize about why Valve’s new console can be the meteorite for consoles. And for Windows PCs. Now the Steam Machine can work. We have seen it on Steam Deck This thing about Steam Machines is nothing new. Not only the Steam Deck is a “Steam machine”, but because Steam Machines already existed a decade ago. At the end of 2013, Valve presented Steam OSa hybrid system between Linux and Steam focused on video games. It was green, but they wanted it to be the heart of the, also recently presentedSteam Machines. In their day, these first machines They were nothing more than pre-assembled computers thanks to the Valve partnership with brands such as Dell, Asus, Gigabyte or AlienWare. They had Steam OSthey were powerful, the hardware could be upgraded and… they didn’t make sense. Its high price, that at the time ‘gaming’ in Linux was not so developed and that to buy a PC like this, you would assemble one piece by piece, meant that Steam Machines did not take off. The fronts will be customizable In fact, all Steam hardware stumbled, from computers to the curious Steam Controller, to a steam link that was liquidated on Steam next to the command. It didn’t catch on, but Valve continued developing the idea and things were different with the Steam Deck. Following the Switch model, the Steam Deck was portable, but it could also output images to a television. It runs the games very well, it has generated a great community and it does not have Windows, but Linux and Steam OS have been its great strength. What didn’t work a decade ago works now thanks to Steam putting a lot of effort into making everything playable on the Deck: from native Linux games to Windows games that they run perfectly with something called Proton. Broadly speaking, it is a “translator” of Windows instructions so that Linux understands them and, thus, can run its games. Plus, everything is easy, intuitive, and if you just want to play, you don’t have to do weird things with the Deck. Bringing that concept from a laptop to a desktop PC was the natural step, and the new Steam Machine has something that the previous ones didn’t have. absolute support from Valve. The ecosystem That is, the company wanted the previous ones to work, but Steam OS was not mature nor did they have control over what the hardware companies did. The new Steam Machine IS from Steam, and that means that they have optimized software and hardware to make it work perfectly. It is something similar to what Apple does or what Sony and Microsoft do with AMD– PC-like components, but tweaked and tuned to meet your console needs. It seems that Valve is going with everything, which is what it did not do 10 years ago Valve itself has confirmed that they are currently fine-tuning some components, such as the GPU, with AMD. The TDP of the discrete GPU is 100W, but they have confessed who are working in a range between 100 and 130 together with the hardware company. That total control was something they didn’t have in the past, and something that didn’t happen years ago was that the components lasted as long. Like it more or less, the arrival of artificial intelligence tools in video games is showing that obsolete hardware (like the Steam Deck) can stay fresh thanks to image reconstruction tools and frame generation. When the Steam Machine arrives in early 2026your hardware will not be cutting edge (in fact, the GPU is based on RDNA3not in RDNA 4), but those AI tools are what gives valve confidence that everything will run smoothly. 4K60 thanks to FSR. Point directly to the living room It is exactly the same philosophy as a console: Closed hardware. Components adjusted by the system designer. Operating system optimized for those components. Direct support from the company that releases the hardware. And, as I said, Valve now has a reputation for supporting gaming hardware, something it has been demonstrating for years with the Steam Deck. The Steam Machine is a threat to consoles, Xbox and… the PC That’s why a Steam Machine that didn’t work in 2015 can work in 2026but there is something else: the market itself. Although consoles continue to have a high share (Sony has confirmed that a PS5 that is having a fairly weak generation in launches It has already sold more than 80 million units), things are very different now. No more big exclusives: everything comes out on PC. Excluding a Nintendo that, with nintendo switch 2 and its intellectual properties, it goes at its own pace, of course. Xbox launches its games directly on computers and consoles (in fact, it is already more third than first, becoming a heavyweight within PlayStation’s own video games) and Sony has been releasing its … Read more

Ryanair is known for being one of the cheapest airlines. It is not so much if we look at its RASK

Iberia reaches third place in AirAdvisor ranking over the best airlines on the continent, even surpassing Ryanair in a key indicator to evaluate cost-efficiency. The study analyzed more than 7.6 million flights and 831,000 passenger opinions to determine which airlines best combine price, service and reliability. Low cost vs. traditional. Iberia is positioned as cheaper than Ryanair when we measure the real cost per seat kilometer, as revealed the latest report AirAdvisor Annual. The Spanish airline ties with Vueling in seventh place if we stick to the price (with a RASK of 0.0824 euros), while Ryanair falls to the last position of this specific indicator, tied with Air France. Why is RASK important?. The RASK indicator (the formula being total revenue between available seats per kilometers flown) measures how much a passenger actually pays for each kilometer traveled, including all additional charges. With this parameter, we can see that low-cost airlines They are not so low-cost when we add extrassuch as checked baggage, seat selection or priority boarding. In this sense, if we stick to the RASK indicator, Iberia demonstrates that a traditional airline can also compete on prices without sacrificing basic services. The complete ranking. According to the report From AirAdvisor, Aegean Airlines repeats as the best European airline for the second consecutive year with 93 points, followed by Finnair (89 points) and Iberia (88 points). The Spanish airline recovers positions after falling to sixth place in 2024, rising three places in one year. Lufthansa and KLM complete the top 5, tied with Scandinavian Airlines. At the opposite extreme, Air Europa once again occupies the last place in the ranking with 48 points. Where Iberia stands out. The Spanish company obtains the highest scores in three key categories, according to the AirAdvisor report: travel with pets, family travel and safety. Its VIP lounges are ranked third in Europe, only behind Aegean and Finnair. In addition, Iberia was ranked 15th in the ranking of the 100 best airlines in the world in 2024. Its main weakness according to the report: reputation among customers, where it is the third worst valued. The Ryanair case. The Irish airline leads with 88% punctuality in both 2023 and 2024, but loses ground in almost all other categories. Ryanair is ranked 12th in the AirAdvisor overall ranking with 58 points, surpassing only Wizz Air, LOT Polish Airlines and Air Europa. In addition, the company obtains the second worst reputation score among customers and, according to the ranking, it is the worst option for traveling with pets and in comfort. The cheapest in Europe. For the third consecutive year, Wizz Air maintains the title of the continent’s cheapest airline, with a RASK of just 0.0417 euros per seat kilometer. They are followed by TAP Air Portugal (0.0713 euros) and Scandinavian Airlines (0.075 euros). However, it’s not all about the price, and Wizz Air occupies 13th place in the general classification, being the worst rated by passengers and registering the lowest scores for travel with pets and comfort. The methodology behind the numbers. According to they claim From AirAdvisor, its team spent weeks analyzing nine different categories to create this ranking. The data includes 7.6 million flights operated between 2023 and 2024, more than 831,000 customer reviews from nine different sources, 75,000 lounge reviews, 46 industry awards and pet, family and comfort policies of 13 airlines. Each category receives a specific score that then adds points for an overall ranking. What does this mean for the travelers. “Low-cost” and “traditional” airlines are becoming diluted and are no longer defined entirely by their quality/price ratio. There are other important indicators, such as the RASK, and airlines such as Iberia, KLM or TAP Air Portugal have adjusted to compete on price with low cost airlines, while ending up offering more complete services without surprise charges. Therefore, for the passenger this means that comparing only the base fare of the ticket can end up being misleading. Hence, a recommended practice is to see the final price of the ticket on each airline that we weigh once all the extras have been added and basic services have been taken into account. Cover image | Wolfgang Weiser In Xataka | In the midst of the battle between Ryanair and Aena, there is a Spanish airport that is suffering more than any other: Valladolid

Spain wants its own public Hugging Face. The problem is that he is late to a battle that already has winners.

The Spanish Government has announced the creation of the Open Source AI Community, a platform that aspires to become the meeting point of the Spanish AI ecosystem. The initiative, presented by the Secretary of State for Digitalization and AI, María González Veracruz, is supported by ALIA and promises to democratize access to AI through open models, datasets and integration tools. Yes, but. He timing It is everything in technology, and Spain arrives when the game is already played: Hugging Face centralizes the development of open models at a global level. GitHub hosts the most important repositories. Flame Meta has become the de facto standard for many developers. Creating a national alternative now is like launching a social network in 2025: technically possible, strategically debatable. Between the lines. The official rhetoric speaks of technological sovereignty and preventing “the digital future from being in the hands of a few.” It is a legitimate argument that works in China, where the State has resources to build parallel ecosystems and close digital borders. But Spain, for good and bad, is not China. Open source AI is, by definition, global and collaborative. Fragmenting it into national initiatives contradicts its very nature. The contrast. The press release sent by the Ministry lists three objectives: Promote practical solutions. Channel Spanish leadership. And create a talent pool. The remaining question is simpler: who is going to choose ALIA when Call 4, Mistral either qwen Are they already integrated into thousands of projects? Not only is the community late, it must compete against models that already have traction, complete documentation, and active communities of millions of developers. What is also missing are concrete resources. The announcement is full of conditional promises: “putting public computing capabilities will be explored,” “there will be” hackathons“sessions will be promoted” networking. What is conspicuous by their absence are specific budget commitments, operational infrastructure from day one, or use cases that demonstrate advantages over what already exists. The big question. If Spain does not have the muscle to create viable alternatives to the American or Chinese technology giants, does it make sense to spend resources pretending that it does? Technological sovereignty is a desirable strategic objective, but it requires sustained investment over decades, not announcements with future tense verbs. The history of European technology is full of failed attempts to replicate other people’s successes without the necessary scale or capital. In Xataka | In Europe we have a problem: we are becoming the Japan of the 21st century Featured image | Secretary of State for Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence

What’s new and what improvements are there in the new version of the ChatGPT model with two personalities

Let’s tell you What’s new in GPT-5.1the new version of the model artificial intelligence of ChatGPT. GPT versions are the engine of your interactions with OpenAI’s AI, and the results that are given to you and the way in which they are told to you depend on them. This new update stands out above all for having two versions with different personalities. But in addition to this, there are also other new features that go more under the hood, but that can also make a difference when it comes to serving you the answers. Here, you must be clear that this new version of GPT-5.1 It has reached paying users firstwhether they have a Plus, Pro, Go or Business subscription. Maybe later it will also reach free users, but probably with limited use. Two GPT-5.1 with two ways to respond As we have told you, the main novelty of this new update is that it offers two versions with different personalities. This goes beyond customize ChatGPT with different personalities as you can do in the settings, but there are directly two versions of GPT-5.1, and each of them has a different type of response. On the one hand it is GPT-5.1 Instantwhich is more conversational and with more “warm” or close responses. and then you have GPT-5.1 Thinkingthat use clearer language with less jargon. This last model is trained for deep reasoning, and responds faster on simple tasks, while dedicating more thinking time to complex ones. Paid ChatGPT users will see the ChatGPT 5.1 model activated at the top. By clicking on the name the model selector will open, and in it you can choose between the variants instant and thinking. There is also a way Car which will choose for you which of the two variants to use depending on what you ask in the prompt. Smarter adaptive reasoning GPT-5.1 also improves its internal logic, and now dynamically decides the “thinking time” that you dedicate to a request. Come on, instead of dedicating the same time to each of them, you will dedicate different times depending on the type of request. This way, when you make a simple query it will be processed with minimal calculation and faster, while more advanced reasoning tasks receive additional layers of analysis to improve the results and make them more coherent and context-sensitive. Behavioral improvements and instructions This new model too improves following instructionsbetter “understanding” what you ask and generating responses that are more aligned with it. Each of the two variants adjusts its reasoning to the complexity of the request to ensure that the answers are consistent with everything you ask of them. Better tone and personality controls We already told you that ChatGPT has a setting to determine the tone and personality of the responses. Now, instead of having predefined ringtones the user can configure it. For example, you can choose to make it professional, friendly, or efficient, and apply it consistently across all interactions. For regular users this simply helps you be more comfortable with the answers it gives you. But for companies it is even more important, since you can align the tone with what you want to use both in your communications with customers and in internal documentation. Context retention improvements Context retention is more effective, which improves continuity in long interactions and with multiple shifts. This will help you as a user, but it is especially important in the business environment, in uses such as customer service or knowledge base systems. Performance optimization Response generation is now faster, and token overhead is reduced to make GPT-5.1 a better model for automated environments. It can deliver higher quality or better results using fewer tokens than previous models, reducing the overall costs of using the API. In Xataka Basics | The best prompts to save hours of work and do your tasks with ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.