Marlon Brando rejected an Oscar in 1973. His authentic story is worthy of the best thriller film

On March 27, 1973, Marlon Brando rejected the Oscar for Best Actor for ‘The Godfather’ as a protest against the treatment of Native Americans. What no one knew then is that the statuette would not disappear, but would tour through some very famous hands in Hollywood, among others Roger Moore and Charlie Chaplin. This is the story of a prize that never existed and, even so, was doubled The rejection. On March 27, 1973, before an audience of 85 million viewers, Sacheen Littlefeather took the stage at the 45th Oscars ceremony and rejected the Best Actor award for ‘The Godfather’ on behalf of Marlon Brando. The gesture was historic: it was the first live political speech at the gala, although not the first time that someone rejected the statuette (Brando was preceded by screenwriter Dudley Nichols in 1936 – out of solidarity with the Writers Guild – and actor George C. Scott in 1971 – who called the ceremony “a two-hour meat parade” -). But what happened to the statuette after that night was a mystery that lasted decades. What no one saw. Sacheen Littlefeather never touched the statuette. Roger Moore (a few months away from debuting as James Bond, but already famous for his television role as The Saint) supported her throughout the speech. When Littlefeather left the stage, Moore followed her with the trophy in her hand and verified that no one had devised any protocol for collecting a rejected Oscar. So he took it with him. The 1616. As reconstructed by Bruce Davis, former executive director of the Academy, the statuette (serial number 1616, not 1601 as was believed for years, a failure whose explanation we will now see and which still contaminates multiple chronicles of the journey of this award) accompanied Moore to several parties after the gala. In this way, he presided over tables full of food and drink and received “almost Bondian attention from a good number of women” before stopping for two weeks at the mansion of producer Albert Broccoli. Eventually, Moore’s publicist, Jerry Pam, returned her to the Academy. Jump to 1995. The story seemed closed until, in 1995, the actor turned agent Marty Ingels called a press conference with an explosive statement: a client of his owned the Oscar rejected by Brando and was willing to auction it to benefit a charitable cause. The Academy responded bluntly: that Oscar did not exist. And technically, the Academy was right. Or not at all. Two 1601s. Ingels revealed the trophy’s serial number: 1601. Academy records indicated that number corresponded to a statuette on loan at an exhibition in New York, and a phone call confirmed that it was still there. But then Ingels sent a photograph of the trophy in his possession and indeed, it could be seen that the engraved number was 1601: there were two statuettes with the same number. Something that had never happened since the Academy began recording serials on the trophies in 1950. The explanation for the mess appeared in a record book prior to the computerization of the archives. Above the entry indicating the loan of the 1601 statuette was another line erased with white concealer. Viewed against the light, the page revealed the original text: “1601 — missing during the 45th Oscar ceremony.” The most likely hypothesis, according to Davis, is that the person responsible for the inventory of figurines that night had a duplicate made of the number 1601 and quietly returned it to the archives. But… why? What else happened in that ceremony that led to a duplicate being made? First robbery. The 1601 that Ingels had was not Brando’s Oscar. It was the duplicate of another trophy stolen that same night: video images of the ceremony show that one of the statuettes for the best documentary award, ‘Marjoe’, was left forgotten on the podium when the lights went out for an advertising break. It is, according to Academy records, the only theft of an Oscar directly from the stage in its entire history. Now, Chaplin. While the riddle of the 1601 was being solved, the fate of Brando’s authentic Oscar (the 1616 returned by Moore) took another turn. Charlie Chaplin had won his first Oscar that same year for the soundtrack of ‘Footlights’, a 1952 film that, due to a regulatory loophole already resolved the following year, was eligible twenty years after it was filmed. The Chaplin figurine was mailed to Europe and arrived damaged. Chaplin’s family returned it to the Academy asking for a replacement, and the Academy engraved Chaplin’s name on Brando’s Oscar and sent it to London. Fifty years later. In August 2022, Academy President David Rubin issued a formal apology to Littlefeather in which he called the treatment received for his statements on Brando’s behalf (boos and stamping from the Academy’s leading men) “disproportionate and unjustified” and acknowledged that the damage to his career was “irreparable.” Littlefeather replied wryly.: “It’s only been 50 years. We have to keep our sense of humor; it’s our survival method.” He died on October 2 of that same year, a few weeks after the tribute ceremony that the Academy held in his honor. The trophy marked 1601(A), the duplicate manufactured to cover the theft, never appeared in public again. In Xataka | The 30 best gangster movies: gangsters, triads, camorra and yakuza show the guts of organized crime

Naples Airport has rejected a Boeing 787 with 200 passengers on board for a single reason: two meters long

Two meters. Not one more, not one less. Those have been the culprit that Naples airport had to reject a flight with origin in Philadelphia. Everything seemed to work without shocks on the morning of June 3. Until the passengers who had to land in Naples received the unpleasant surprise that they would land in Rome. The reason: the plane was too big for the airport. Six meters. That is the distance that differentiates a Boeing 787-8 from a Boeing 787-9. Both They are part of the Dreamliner family (which is also part of the Boeing 787-10) and are common on transatlantic flights since their autonomy widely exceeds 10,000 kilometers and have more than 200 places for passengers. The size in all cases is 60 meters but its length grows as the last name number increases. Thus, the Boeing 787-8 measures 57 meters long but the 787-9 already extends to 63 meters long. The 787-10 reaches 68 meters long. A small (big) difference. Those six meters long suppose a problem that is called 8 RFFS category airport (Rescue and Fire Fighting Services, for its acronym in English). This name refers to the aircraft that an airport can manage, according to the emergency and fire extinction services that it has at your disposal. In this case, the 8 RFFS category allows aircraft to be operated with a maximum size of 61 meters long. That is, it can handle the Boeing 787-8 but not the Boeing 787-9, which exceeds in two meters the dimensions established by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization). In order to manage the landing of a Boeing 787-9 it is necessary for the airport to have a 9 RFFS category where airplanes are allowed to land up to 76 meters long. Better to Rome. This scenario did not contemplate in American Airlines when they decided that, for operational reasons, a Boeing 787-9 had to operate the Philadelphia-Naples route that the airline keeps open. Usually, this journey is made by a Boeing 787-8 (smaller) since They open the route last summer. In fact, in the press release of the Naples airport it is specified that the plane used will be the smallest of the Dreamliner line. But, as we said, last week American Airlines decided to send Naples a Boeing 787-9. When the plane It was 70 miles of his destiny he had to turn around and deviate to Rome. The problem was evident, from Naples they reported that they could not host the flight because their category prevents it. The plane was too big. Specifically, the two meters that exceeds an airport with 8 RFFS category can operate it. By bus. They explain in Business Insider that passengers had to cover the distance between both airports by bus, on a trip that took them from two to three hours, or by plane, in Routes operated by Ita Airways. The company apologized and alleged the American media that “operational limitations” had occurred that had prevented the plane in southern Italy. In CBS They point out that 231 passengers and 11 crew members who received, for any response from the company “apologies for the interruption of the trip” were traveling on board the aircraft, in a statement rescued by the media. Photo | Dominic Bieri and Flightware In Xataka |

The Board of Directors has officially rejected its offer

“OpenAi is not on saleand the Board has unanimously rejected the last attempt of Mr. Musk to alter its competition, ”said Bret Taylor, president of the non -profit organization of the AI ​​company, said Friday, In a message posted in X. In this way, the offer of 97.4 billion dollars launched on February 10 by the CEO of Tesla has been officially discarded by its recipient. This is an important setback for the businessman’s plans and a victory for Sam Altman. Musk gave the impression of being very sure Musk’s purchase attempt seemed to affect the plan set by Altman to transform the startup commercial arm In a public benefit corporation (PBC)liberating it in addition to entity control Nonprofit To get more investments. Musk’s lawyers even said this week that their client would withdraw the offer if the Openai Board promised to “preserve the mission of the beneficial organization and stipulate that the sign of ‘is sold’ for sale ‘of its assets stopping its conversion.” “Openai is not on sale, and the Board has unanimously rejected the last attempt of Mr. Musk to alter its competition. Any possible reorganization of OpenAI will reinforce our non -profit organization and its mission to ensure that Agi benefits all humanity. ” Let us remember that Elon Musk sue Openai and Sam Altman with the argument that the company was moving away from its founding mission to develop AI to “benefit of humanity“And that he had made a” de facto fusion “with Microsoft. Well, it has not been necessary for OpenAi to have to change its plans to avoid the attempt to acquire Musk, but it has been the organization that has directly rejected it, although it is yet to be seen what collateral effect can have this. Although Musk’s present offer has lost validity, there is the possibility that it has influenced the compensation value that Openai must pay to your entity without profit to separate from it. We have explained it in detail in another article. Images | OpenAI In Xataka | Openai wants to square a circle with GPT-5: earn money and become the “new Google” offering something free

Feyenoord rejected Milan’s offer for Santi Giménez and asks for $42 million for the Mexican

Italian media reported a few days ago that Milan has great interest in signing forward Santiago Giménez. They would even have put an offer on the table to Feyenoord for the transfer of the Mexican which was worth $31 million dollars. However, the most recent information from the Italian journalist Luca Maninettiel They claim that the Dutch club rejected this offer and he would only sell Giménez in the summer market and for a figure close to $42 million dollars. “El Bebote”, as he is often nicknamed, has had a great half of the season with 15 goals in 18 games with Feyenoord. Therefore, the interest of big clubs is beginning to be noticed. Santiago Gimenez during a Champions League match.Credit: MAURICE VAN STEEN | AP Even last summer Giménez was already scouted by elite clubs in Europe such as Milan, Liverpool and even Real Madrid, according to several rumors. A possible arrival at Milan would be a dream for Giménez, who already commented last December in an interview for ESPN which is one of his favorite clubs. “On the last day of the market, Milan looked for me and did not agree that day, because the price and time were short. Going to Milan would be a dream for me, and when I was a boy I grew up with Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Kaka. In the end it didn’t happen, but the fact that there is interest makes you feel important, and that option is still open,” he explained on that occasion. For now Giménez has a contract with Feyenoord until 2027. So if he does not extend his contract soon, he could leave next summer as long as an agreement is reached for his transfer. Currently the Mexican forward, although born in Buenos Aires, tIt has a market value of $40 million dollarsaccording to the specialized site Transfermarkta figure in line with what Feyenoord would be asking for his token. Keep reading:Santi Giménez would have an offer from Milan on the tableThey once again proclaim Real Madrid as the best club in the worldKylian Mbappé dissociates himself from controversy with Neymar: “I respect him a lot”

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.