Model

Sandra Ortega rents hotels to hotels. Amancio Ortega has copied the model with a luxury hotel in Paris

by

If Amancio Ortega is characterized by something, it is his proven sense of smell. the real estate business by the hand of your investment company. In July 2025, the millionaire founder of Inditex closed the purchase of one of the most luxurious hotels in the center of Paris. The hotel business is not Ortega’s strong suit, but the buildings that house these hotels are, which later rents to large hotel chains. This play is not one more purchase from the tycoonis a business model in which her eldest daughter: Sandra Ortega specializes. The Radisson Hotel Group firm, owned by the Chinese Jin Jiang, and the second largest hotel company in the world, has announced that in the summer of 2026 it will open a new establishment in the building that Amancio Ortega purchased. The great purchase in the heart of Paris. Pontegadea paid 97 million euros in July 2025 for the Banke Hotel, a five-star hotel with 91 rooms that until now was owned by the Derby Hotels chain. Although the purchase of this building is far from being the most expensive investment of Pontegadea, it is the most expensive asset of the hotel investment company. As usually happens in buildings you acquire Pontegadea, the Hotel Banke is located in one of the most exclusive areas of the French capital: on rue de La Fayette, a stone’s throw from the Galeries Lafayette and the Opera Garnier. A privileged location for tourists and executives. Solvent tenants and immediate profitability. Pontegadea strictly follows a common pattern in all its real estate operations: selecting buildings in privileged areas and securing contracts with immediate tenants of maximum solvency for them. Amazon, Google, DHL, Apple, Spotify, Primark itself and Inditex franchises are its main clients. This makes Pontegadea begin to make its properties profitable immediately. In the case of the Banke Hotel in Paris, Pontegadea signed with Radisson Hotel Group almost immediately after its purchase. Given the location and the category that the building already held, the hotel firm has decided to operate it under the Radisson Collection, its most exclusive brand. Of the 905 hotels managed by Radisson around the world, only 42 belong to this line, 4.6% of the total, which highlights the premium level they have given to Ortega’s project. History of the building and its key renovation. This property was built in 1907 as a bank headquarters and was transformed into a hotel in 2009, preserving that historical charm that is so popular in Paris. The hotel closed at the end of September to undertake a series of reforms to adapt it to Radisson standards, opening as Banke Opera Paris in the third quarter of 2026. Radisson’s statement said: “The 90-room hotel will undergo a comprehensive renovation that will reflect a contemporary interpretation of Parisian elegance. The property features a striking Belle Époque facade and classic architectural details, including a famous staircase designed by Gustave Eiffel. Guests will be welcomed into a 19th-century atrium that will house a reception, bar and restaurant. Additional amenities include a state-of-the-art gym and wellness facilities in the former bank vault, as well as an attractive offer for meetings and events. The intelligent strategy of the Ortegas. Amancio Ortega and his daughter Sandra have polished a winning formula: acquire iconic properties in key metropolises such as Paris, New York or Miami, make the necessary tweaks and then rent them to top hotel operators. This ensures a fixed income without worrying about daily management, maximizing the value of its premium locations. In France, Pontegadea has seven acquisitions, six of them in Paris, including an office building for 227 million euros in 2024 near the Opera, integrated into the ambitious Grand Opera project. Sandra faithfully follows this paternal model, diversifying the family empire into high-end hospitality. The expanding hotel portfolio. Pontegadea started in hospitality in February 2021 with the Senator Playaballena in Cádiz for 25 million euros. In December 2023, he added two boutique hotels in Palma de Mallorca for 35 million to a Swedish group, showing how they climb from Spain to the world. Ortega’s hotel business extends across the pond, with the Epic Hotel in Miami and the Iberostar on Park Avenue in New York. Meanwhile, Radisson reinforces its presence in France with four more openings, reaching 34 hotels in total and 11 in Paris with around 1,700 rooms, thanks to strategic partners such as Pontegadea. In Xataka | Seven of the ten largest fortunes in the world in 2026 are due to AI: this illustrative graph makes it very clear Image | Gtres, Tripadvisor

The Model 3 is no longer the best-selling premium electric vehicle in China

by

The automotive industry is giving us not-so-subtle clues about its changes and the baton it picks up. China as an influential country in this sector It is taking more and more shape. Just two years ago, dethroning the Tesla Model 3 as the best-selling electric sedan might seem like a joke. However, this same thing has happened in China, as it is the Xiaomi SU7 the one that has taken that position from him, and even more of an achievement if we take into account that it is the first car from the now also automobile manufacturer. Figures. Xiaomi’s SU7 reached 258,164 units sold in China during 2025, exceeding the 200,361 deliveries of the Model 3 by almost 30%, according to data of the Chinese Passenger Car Association (CPCA). It is the first time that a Chinese manufacturer has managed to take the lead from the Tesla model in its category since it began to be assembled in the Shanghai Gigafactory at the end of 2019. Context. Xiaomi has only been delivering vehicles since March 2024, making this success even more significant. With a huge user base on its mobile devices and other technological products, the Chinese manufacturer has managed to boost sales of its first vehicle with very outstanding features such as its sophisticated autonomous driving system preliminary and software and technology that has become a reference. There in China, the basic model of the SU7 has a price of 215,500 yuan (about 26,400 euros at the exchange rate), 9% cheaper than the Model 3, which starts at 235,500 yuan. The decline of Tesla in China. Elon Musk’s brand has seen how its market share was plummeting from 16% in 2020, when it began producing the Model 3 in Shanghai, to 6.9% in 2024. Tesla’s total deliveries in the country fell 4.8% in 2025 to 625,698 units, representing just 4.8% of total electric vehicle sales in China. “Tesla’s Chinese competitors are able to make technologically comparable vehicles while offering them at lower prices,” counted Eric Han, from the consulting firm Suolei, to the SCMP media. Lights and shadows of SU7. Despite Xiaomi’s great success, the SU7 has also been marked by tragedy. And in March 2025, three people died in an accident with an SU7 in the province of Anhui while the driving assistance system was activated, which led the Chinese authorities to tighten supervision over these technologies. In October, another fatal accident in Chengdu involving a SU7 Ultra once again generated debate, this time because neither the members of the vehicle, nor the people who wanted to help them, were able to open the doors of the burning vehicle. New versions. The company presented in early January a renewed version of the SU7 with a range of more than 900 kilometers on a single charge, launched in pre-sale from 229,900 yuan (about 28,000 euros at the exchange rate). The top-of-the-range edition reaches 902 km of autonomy, compared to 830 km for the Pro version that currently exists. Tesla doesn’t look good in Europe either. Things are starting to look ugly for Tesla, because if we are going to its overall figuresElon Musk’s company delivered 1.64 million vehicles in 2025, compared to 1.79 million in 2024, accumulating two consecutive years of declines. In Europe, where Tesla launched trimmed versions of the Model Y and Model 3 to defend volumes, registrations fell 25% in the eight main markets. Its share in our market fell from 2.4% to 1.7% until November, according to the European association ACEA. Between the lines. Nor can we say that Tesla already has everything on order, especially considering that the Model Y remains the best-selling SUV in China. However, the ability of Chinese manufacturers to compete in the premium segment with technologically advanced vehicles and more competitive prices is redrawing the map of the sector. We were recently talking about BYD surpassed Tesla as the largest electric vehicle manufacturer in the world, with 2.25 million units sold in 2025. Of course, the fragmentation of the Chinese market, which already has more than 50 electric vehicle manufacturers, and the fierce price warraise doubts about the long-term profitability of the sector. Cover image | David von Diemar In Xataka | There is an unexpected victim of the rise in RAM memory prices: the very modern connected cars

Decathlon has just bought Intersport in Spain. And with this, a business model closes: multi-brand sports retail.

by

Decathlon has notified the CNMC the acquisition of Intersport CCS in Spain. The operation would add some 120 stores (30 owned and 90 franchised) to the 176 stores that Decathlon already operates in the country. Now the regulator You have one month to make a statement in first phase. Why is it important. This purchase closes one business model and consolidates another: Intersport represented the retail traditional sports: multi-brand, with Nike, Adidas, Puma and company on its shelves. Decathlon is the opposite: the own brand (Van Rysel, Quechua, Kiprun…) is what dominates, with mainly low prices, or at least lower than those of the big brands, and total control of the value chain. The first has gone bankrupt and the second keeps its locations. The background. Intersport entered bankruptcy in March 2025 with a debt of between 14 and 30 million euros. Tried to get 70% cuts with banks like BBVA and Sabadell, and with suppliers like Nike and Puma, but it didn’t work. In November, Intersport France bought the business for 300,000 euros and now it is Decathlon who takes it entirely. Between the lines. The battle of retail sports is no longer so much about what brands you sell as about how many square meters you control and what you sell within. The big sports brands have opted for direct sales to the consumer (Nike closing distributors, for example, although he got a frog). Intersport was trapped selling brands that no longer needed it to reach the customer, without great differentiation of its own and with very high inventory costs. Nike and Asics are not Kalenji and Artengo. Yes, but. Decathlon buys Intersport largely because it buys key locations before they are occupied by Amazon, Shein (which is about to physically disembark in Europe) or any other e-commerce actor that needs a physical presence at least to facilitate returns and collections. In it retail 2026, the physical store continues to be differential, but only if you sell products that cannot be easily purchased online. A Van Rysel cycling set is not on Amazon. Some Nikes, yes. The contrast. This is not very different from what happens in the food sector: Mercadona dominates because it sells its few own brands and controls the chain. Multi-brand supermarkets (those that only distribute) are in a more complicated position. He retail sports follows the same pattern: consolidate or die. Stores without their own identity tend to disappear. And now what. If the CNMC approves the operation, Decathlon will reinforce its hegemony in Spain. But the news is not so much the number of stores as the model that remains standing. In 2026, those who control what they produce, how they sell it, and where they distribute it survive survive. The rest is noise. In Xataka | Wallapop taught us how to sell used things. Decathlon has learned to make money with it Featured image | Decathlon, Intersport

Its greatest advantage is not having its own model

by

Meta ended its 2025 by announcing the purchase of manus for more than 2,000 million dollars. It says a lot that it is a company that coordinates and directs other people’s models. Why is it important. Manus reached 100 million in annual recurring revenue without training a single model. Use Claude and Alibaba models to do the heavy lifting. Its differentiation is not in the intelligence of the model but in the execution: planning complex tasks, invoking tools, iterating on results, delivering finished work… a purely agentic model that achieved its little viral moment at the beginning of the year. OpenAI, Google and company focus on announcing models that fight to get tenths in the benchmarksbut Manus simply makes money by selling that ability to direct other people’s models. The backdrop. In ranking like those of Chatbot Arena We have been seeing the same pattern for a year: every time one model is crowned the best, another surpasses it in a few weeks. None manages to make a lasting difference and there is no great difference. moatnot even the capillarity and recognition of OpenAI, or the distribution capacity of Google. Yes, but. Yeah the models are commoditizing and they are increasingly interchangeable, where is the business? Meta just gave his answer: at the application layer. In who controls the distribution where people actually use AI. Meta spends $70 billion a year (and counting) on ​​AI infrastructure, but Meta AI It is not curdling and Flame 4 punctured. It lacks what Manus has proven to have: a proven ability to turn models into products that people pay to use. The threat. Meta is facing a distribution problem: Google has Android, Google Search, Gmail, Google Docs… Microsoft has Windows and its suite of productivity, in addition to being ubiquitous in companies. Apple controls the iPhone and the Mac. And Meta has social and messaging platforms, but its track record in corporate products is disastrous. Workplace never took off and closed. Their reputation with business data isn’t exactly great. Buying technology is easy, but whether companies trust Meta as a provider of work tools is another story. Chinese arbitration. Chinese AI startups are clearly undervalued: The Chinese number one is worth less than 1% of the American one with comparable technical capacity, and the penetration of OpenAI justifies the distance, but not at that level. Benchmark Capital saw these figures and he put in 75 million in May at a valuation of 500 million. a few months later goes for more than 2,000 million. The new manual. Manus has just shown that there is a viable route for Chinese AI startups: turn to cheap and well-trained Chinese talent, develop a product designed for global markets (and not just Chinese) from day one, raise Western capital, move the legal headquarters outside of China (in this case, Singapore), and achieve a “clean exit.” Other Chinese startups can now be expected to follow a similar path, and the Chinese authorities are aware of this… and are not happy with the idea, according to the wall Street Journal. They see it as a leak of technology developed with local engineers. And now what. Meta will integrate Manus into Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. But the real message goes further: in AI, as happened with the Internet, the infrastructure becomes commodity and the business is in the digital “last mile”, where technology touches the user. Meta just paid 2.5 billion to not forget that lesson. In Xataka | Mark Zuckerberg is giving a radical change to Meta’s AI strategy. And that’s what happens when you lose a Nobel Prize winner. Featured image | Manus, Xataka with Mockuuups Studio

Russia’s ghost fleet has changed its business model. Oil has given way to a much bigger target: Europe

by

Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia has not only built a vast fleet of tankers to avoid Western sanctions and continue exporting crude oil from the Baltic and the Black Sea, but has turned that logistical infrastructure into something much more ambitious. How much? The size of an old continent. The fleet in the shadows. According to Western and Ukrainian intelligence sources cited by CNN, Part of this so-called shadow fleet is being used as a covert platform for espionage and hybrid operations in European waters. We are talking about hundreds of ships that routinely sail near the coasts of EU and NATO countries, generating income of hundreds of millions of dollars for Moscow while, at the same time, expanding the radius of action of its security services away from Russian territory. “Civilian” crews with a detail. The pattern detected by the intelligence services is revealing. Many of these tankers, registered under flags of convenience and with mostly Asian or African crews, incorporate just before setting sail to one or two Russian citizens additional. The crew lists show as simple “technicians”but his background tells another story: former police officers, members of special units of the Ministry of the Interior, veterans of the Russian army or former mercenaries linked to Wagner. They are often the only Russians on board and, according to testimonies of Danish maritime pilots and European observers, exercise an authority that goes beyond the civilian chain of command, even imposing itself over the ship’s captain. Moran Security and privatization. Many of these men would be linked to Moran Security Groupa private Russian company with deep ties to the FSB, GRU, and the Kremlin’s military contractor ecosystem. Moran was sanctioned by the United States Treasury in 2024 for providing armed security services to Russian state companies, and his history connects directly with Wagner and with operations in scenarios such as Syria or Somalia. Its corporate structure (with registrations in Moscow and in opaque jurisdictions such as Belize) and its professional profile, explicitly oriented to recruit veterans of special forces, fit perfectly into the logic of hybrid warfare: formally private actors that allow the Russian state to operate with a high degree of plausible deniability. Espionage and internal control. The functions of these “technicians” would not be limited to protecting the cargo. Ukrainian and Western sources maintain that also supervise captains non-Russian vessels to ensure that the ships are acting in the interests of the Kremlin and that, in at least one documented case, took photographs of European military installations from one of these tankers. Furthermore, although details are scarce, intelligence services suggest that some of these men have participated in acts of sabotage. These would not be direct confrontations, but rather low-profile actions designed to collect information, generate uncertainty and strain the limits of the Western response. The Boracay case. He Boracay tanker illustrates this dynamic well. Sanctioned, with frequent changes of name and flag, two Russian citizens embarked in September in the port of Primorsk, near Saint Petersburg. Both were listed as technicians and were the only Russians among a crew of Chinese, Burmese and Bangladeshis. Coincidence or not, his crossing through Danish waters overlapped with a wave of sightings of drones near the Copenhagen airport and Danish military bases. Days later, the ship was boarded by the French navy against Brittany for irregularities in their documentation. No drones were found on board, but the presence of the two Russians came to light and they were discreetly questioned. For some analyststemporal correlation proves nothing, but for others It fits too well with the pattern of trial and error in the “gray zone.” Drones, sensors and something new. Beyond Boracay, Swedish and Danish authorities have detected on other ships in the shadow fleet antennas and masts not usually found on civilian merchant ships, as well as hostile behavior towards inspectors and an obsession with photographing critical infrastructure. In an environment like the Baltic, a strategic bottleneck surrounded by NATO countries, any anomalous activity becomes a disproportionate weight. For European security services, these ships are ideal mobile platforms: seemingly legal, difficult to intercept without diplomatic escalation and capable of approaching ports, cables, bases and airports without raising immediate alarms. Hybrid warfare at sea. All this fits with a broader strategy that senior intelligence officials, such as the new head of British MI6describe as constant testing “below the threshold of war.” Drones near airports, aggressive activity at sea, discreet sabotage and covert espionage are part of the same repertoire. The shadow fleet is not only an economic instrument to circumvent sanctions, but an extension of the Russian security apparatus, capable of operating in a space where Western legal and military responses are slow and politically sensitive. The European dilemma. Europe thus faces an uncomfortable decision. Intercepting ships without insurance, with dubious documentation or with armed personnel on board could stop these practices, but it also carries the risk of a direct russian reaction. As summarized on CNN a veteran Danish maritime pilot, no small country wants to be the first to make the move. The answer, if it comes, will have to be collective. Meanwhile, the shadow fleet continues growing and sailingdemonstrating that for the Kremlin the war is not only being fought in Ukraine, but also in the seas surrounding Europe, silently and in civilian uniform. Image | kees torn, Greg Bishop In Xataka | For years Europe has wondered how to stop the Russian ghost fleet. Ukraine just showed you the way: with AI In Xataka | A ghost fleet has mapped the entire underwater structure of the EU. The question is what Moscow is going to do with that information.

Google just changed the rules of the lightweight model

by

Now, in the race to lead the development of artificial intelligence, something unusual has just happened. Gemini 3 FlashGoogle’s new model, has surpassed GPT-5.2 Extra High, the higher-reasoning variant of OpenAI, in several performance tests. And that forces us to rethink some of the rules that we took for granted. A fast model that also reasons. Google’s new model comes with a very specific promise: to demonstrate that “speed and scalability do not have to come at the expense of intelligence.” Although it has been designed with efficiency in mind, both in cost and speed, Google insists that Gemini 3 Flash also excels at reasoning tasks. According to the company, the model can adjust your thinking ability. It is able to “think” for longer when the use case requires it, but it also uses 30% fewer tokens on average than Gemini 2.5 Promeasured with typical traffic, to complete a wide variety of tasks with high precision and without penalizing response times. The truth is in the benchmarks. Are the benchmarks perfect? No. But they are still one of the most useful tools we have for comparing AI models.confront them against each other and detect in which scenarios they perform better or worse. And in this area, Gemini 3 Flash comes out well. In SimpleQA Verifieda test that measures reliability in knowledge questions, Gemini 3 Flash achieves 68.7% compared to 38.0% for GPT-5.2 Extra High. In multimodal reasoning, within MMMU-Pro, Google’s model scores 81.2% compared to OpenAI’s 79.5%. In Video-MMMU, Flash achieves 86.9% compared to 85.9% for GPT-5.2 Extra High. If we look at multilingual and cultural capabilities, Flash is again ahead, with 91.8% compared to 89.6% for GPT-5.2 Extra High. In Global PIQA, focused on common sense in 100 languages, the difference remains: 92.8% for Flash versus 91.2% for the OpenAI model. Everything indicates that Gemini 3 Flash is specially optimized to capture nuances outside of English and reason more fluently in global contexts. He also excels in the use of tools and agents. In Toolathlon, Flash scores 49.4% compared to GPT-5.2 Extra High’s 46.3%. In the FACTS Benchmark Suite, the difference is tighter, but still in favor of Google: 61.9% versus 61.4%. In long-term tool execution tasks, Flash appears to show greater consistency. But he is not the king of pure reasoning. Now, it is worth looking at the complete photo. Although Gemini 3 Flash outperforms the best OpenAI model in several tests, if you are looking for “pure” reasoning, the balance changes. In the most demanding tests in this area, GPT-5.2 Extra High continues to set the benchmark. OpenAI’s model leads ARC-AGI-2, focused on visual puzzles, with 52.9% compared to Flash’s 33.6%. In AIME 2025, with code execution, it reaches 100% compared to 99.7%. And in SWE-bench Verified, aimed at software engineering, it obtains 80.0% compared to 78.0% for Gemini 3 Flash. What exactly is GPT-5.2 Extra High. Throughout the article the name GPT-5.2 Extra High appears several times, and it is normal to wonder if it is something new or little known. In reality, it is not a model that is usually mentioned to the general public. Google uses this designation in its comparison table to refer to the maximum level of reasoning available in the OpenAI API for GPT-5.2 Thinking and Pro. In the official OpenAI documentation it is identified as “xhigh”. Where you can use Gemini 3 Flash. Access to Gemini 3 Flash is not country dependent. If you have access to the Gemini appyou are already using this model, which has become the default option. It is also reaching developers through the API, AI Studio and Vertex AI. In the United States, the deployment goes a step further, as the Gemini 3 Flash has become the default model of the AI Mode of the Google search engine. The price of using Gemini 3 Flash. For those who want to integrate Gemini 3 Flash into their applications, the model costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens. This is a slight increase over Gemini Flash 2.5, which was $0.30 per million tokens in and $2.50 per million tokens out. An increasingly tight race. Gone are the days when Google tried to confront ChatGPT with Bard, or when OpenAI seemed to be years ahead of the rest. Today, the distances between the big players in AI have been drastically reduced. The competition is more direct, more technical and, above all, much closer. Images | Google In Xataka | Amazon is preparing an investment of 10 billion in OpenAI because if you can’t beat your enemy, the best thing is to join him

DeepSeek has launched its new reasoner model. It’s free and beats GPT-5

by

DeepSeek has introduced DeepSeek-V3.2 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale. They are AI models that combine complex reasoning with the ability to use tools autonomously. Why is it important. The company of Hangzhou claims that DeepSeek-V3.2 matches the performance of GPT-5 in multiple reasoning tests. The Speciale model It reaches the level of Gemini-3 Pro and has achieved gold medals in international mathematics and computer science Olympiads. The context. DeepSeek surprised the world in January with a revolutionary model for efficiency and cost. Now it ups the ante with open source systems that throw down the gauntlet directly to OpenAI and Google in reasoning capabilities. Technical innovation. DeepSeek-V3.2 integrates “thinking” directly into tool usage for the first time. You can reason internally while running web searches, operating a calculator, or writing code. The system works in two modes: With visible reasoning (similar to the reasoning seen in ChatGPT and company). Or without any reasoning. The chain of thought persists between tool calls and is restarted only when the user sends a new message. How they have achieved it. Researchers have developed ‘DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA)’, an architecture that greatly reduces the computational cost of processing long contexts. The model maintains 671 billion total parameters but activates only 37 billion per token. In figures. DSA cuts the cost of inference in long contexts by approximately 50% compared to the previous dense architecture. The system processes 128,000 context windows tokens in production. Reinforcement training has consumed more than 10% of the total pretraining count. The team has generated more than 1,800 synthetic environments and 85,000 tasks to train agent capabilities. The results. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has won a gold medal at the International Mathematical Olympiad 2025, the International Informatics Olympiad 2025, the ICPC World Finals 2025 and the Chinese Mathematical Olympiad 2025. Both models are available now. V3.2 works on app, web and API. V3.2-Speciale only by API, at least for now. Between the lines. DeepSeek has published the full weights and technical report of the training process. This transparency contrasts with what large American technology companies usually do. Even those that offer open source models such as Call, with an asterisk. The Chinese startup wants to demonstrate that open source systems can compete with the most advanced proprietary models. And it does so while continuing to reduce costs. Yes, but. The benchmarks Public settings do not always reflect performance on real-world tasks. Direct comparisons with GPT-5 either Gemini-3 Pro They depend on specific metrics that may not capture all relevant dimensions. Furthermore, the integration of tools in reasoner mode still needs to be tested in complex real-world use cases. The reduced cost is not as important if the quality of the responses does not hold up. In Xataka | DeepSeek Guide: 36 Features and Things You Can Do for Free with This AI Featured image | Solen Feyissa

It is surely the best model for programming, but it still has a big problem

by

Anthropic has announced Claude Opus 4.5, its most advanced AI model to date. The company claims it is the best in the world for programming, intelligent agents and computing usage, beating OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 Codex-Max and Google’s Gemini 3 Pro. It has also arrived a few days after both as well as Grok 4.1. The general overview. The new model has achieved 80.9% accuracy in SWE-Bench Verified, the benchmark reference to evaluate software engineering capabilities. Anthropic has also put it through its own hiring test for engineers – notably difficult, with a two-hour limit – and the model has outperformed every human candidate who took it. Why is it important. This release solidifies Anthropic as a leader in AI tools for programming. Even Meta uses Claude for its internal Devmate code assistantdespite competing directly with the company in other areas. The improvements are not limited to the code. Opus 4.5 stands out in: Creation of documents, spreadsheets and professional presentations. Deep research tasks with multiple sources. Advanced visual and mathematical reasoning. Management of subagent teams for complex multi-agent systems. In figures. Additionally, Anthropic has drastically reduced the price of its API: from $15/75 per million tokens entrance/exit at 5/25 dollars. And the model is more efficient than its predecessors: In medium effort mode, it equals the performance of Sonnet 4.5 but consumes 76% less tokens. In high mode, it beats Sonnet 4.5 by 4.3 percentage points using 48% less tokens. The context. The company has introduced that “effort” parameter (low, medium, high) that allows developers to control how long and tokens invests the model in solving a problem. It is a trend that OpenAI has also adopted in its latest modelsseeking efficiency without sacrificing quality. In detail. Along with the model, Anthropic has updated its development platform and consumer applications: Claude Code Improves your planning mode: Asks clarifying questions before creating an editable execution plan file. As seen with the Deep Research on duty. Claude for Chrome is now available to all Max users (around $100-$200 per month depending on limits), allowing AI to manage tasks across multiple browser tabs. Claude for Excel opens to Max, Team, and Enterprise users, with support for charts, pivot tables, and file uploads. Endless conversations– Long conversations no longer run into context window limits thanks to automatic summaries. Yes, but. The big problem with Opus 4.5 and Claude in general is its usage limit. Even for Pro and Max subscribers of the first levelthe tokens They sell out quickly. They take five hours to restart from the first message sent. The Opus model, being the most powerful, is also the one that consumes the quotas the fastest. This is the main source of frustration for users who pay $20 or even $100 a month. Anthropic has slightly increased the limits for Max and Team Premium, but the experience is still far from what is expected in a service of this category. Between the lines. The release of Opus 4.5 restores balance to the Anthropic model family. For the past two months, Sonnet 4.5 was outperforming the older Opus 4.1, leaving little reason to use the more expensive model. Now, with three clearly differentiated models (Haiku, Sonnet and Opus), each one has a specific purpose in terms of cost, speed and capacity. And now what. Anthropic follows a clear strategy: position itself as the premium provider for knowledge professionals and developers, competing directly with OpenAI and Google in the field where accuracy and reliability matter most. But if you don’t solve the problem of usage limits, you risk frustrating the very users who could get the most value from the model. In Xataka | AI is transforming the relationship we have with our own ideas: we no longer create, we just “edit” ourselves Featured image | Anthropic

What are the news about Google’s new artificial intelligence model?

by

Let’s tell you what they are the main news of Gemini 3the new version of the model artificial intelligence announced by Google. We already have the first data on its main characteristics. As always, the flashes will go to Gemini 3 Pro, which will be the most advanced version. Here, one thing you want to know is that You will notice few of these new developments when you are using Gemini in a conventional way. Most of these changes are aimed at advanced users. Gemini 3 news A step forward in all areas: Google has presented the results of its model in various types of tests, comparing it with the previous version and its direct competition. He is ahead of everyone in everything, from mathematics to understanding what is happening on the screen or creating code. Reason “at the doctoral level”: That is what the test results also indicate, although where it advances the most is in the mathematical results, with a score of 23.4% for the MathArena Apex test compared to 1.0% for GPT 5.1 or 1.6% for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Integrates with Google Search: Gemini 3 is linked to Google’s AI Mode, integrating into the search engine. Generate visual elements: Gemini 3, has the ability to create interactive visual elements, such as calculators, simulations or widgets in real time. Something especially useful when integrated into the search engine. Sometimes it may not respond to you with text, but with an interactive webapp. More direct answers: Google has fine-tuned the way its model responds, offering more concise responses that offer more valuable information and less flattery, clichés and clichés. Improvements in “Deep Thinking”: Another of the most notable improvements is in deep thinking, in addition to advances in code execution, abstract reasoning and visual understanding. Larger context window: This model has a context window of up to one million tokens, being able to analyze large code repositories or very long texts on which you can later work. Better contextual reasoning: Reasoning is improved, especially with long contexts, to avoid hallucinations. Parallel reasoning improvements: Abilities to reason with visual and textual data at the same time are improved, improving accuracy when interpreting tables, diagrams and interfaces. Improvements in its multimodal mode: The analysis of all types of information is improved. For example, you can decipher and even translate handwritten recipes in different languages, and use them to create a cookbook that you can share. You can also analyze sports matches, scrutinize research data and generate code from it. Programming improvements: As we said at the beginning, one of the biggest improvements of this model is in its ability to program. Improved your agent mode: Your ability to use tools and operate a computer through the terminal using agent mode has also been improved. Agents with Gemini can now autonomously plan and improve more complex software tasks. Gemini 3 will begin to be available in the coming daysalthough as we told you at the beginning, it is possible that many of the differences will not be noticed unless you are going to try to take advantage of them in an advanced way. In Xataka Basics | The best prompts to save hours of work and do your tasks with ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

Renault is already pushing for Europe to copy the Chinese model

by

The statements have been as concise as they are clear: “You cannot come to Europe and build four plates with wheels and seats with little added value. What we have to do is commit them to teach us, to come with products with added value. We did not do it like that when we went to China, they should not do it when they come to Europe” The words are from Josep Maria Recasens, president of Renault Spain, and reflect in three sentences the situation that the industry is experiencing in Europe, its internal debates and its fears. Added value. This is what Recasens has demanded at the 1st Automotive Forum, organized by the Automotive Press Group to which it belongs. The Automotive Tribune. The president of Renault Spain, who is also the president of ANFAC (the manufacturers’ association in our country) has demanded that Europe force Chinese brands to associate with European ones so that they “teach us” how they make their products. In Recasens’ opinion, Europe is opening the door to Chinese brands, allowing them to build “four plates with wheels and seats with little added value.” It is a veiled statement that points to the Chinese factories that are settling in our country but that, however, plan to produce vehicles based on kits that already come pre-assembled from China. What do they teach us? When the president of Renault asks that the European Union force Chinese manufacturers “to teach us” it is for two reasons. The first is that China forced foreign manufacturers to partner with their local firms to produce on its soil. What did they earn? Obviously, knowledge. Just take a look at the MG4 Electric to understand the extent to which its partnership with Volkswagen has borne fruit. At the same time, foreign manufacturers could produce at a much lower price and had access to the largest market in the world. What, we assume, they did not imagine is that China was going to surpass the West. Yes, let them teach us. The second point referred to in “let them teach us” is evident: the president of Renault and Anfac recognizes that, at least in part, China is ahead. And the French company itself has gone to Shanghai to develop your Renault Twingoa car whose heart has been created internally in China in record time for the European industry. But there have also been curious situations such as Mazda has brought the Mazda 6e to Europea car developed by Changan in China that, given its success, they have decided to test on European soil with a groundbreaking price per size. And the warnings don’t end there. The industry has entered a fever to shorten deadlines and approaching the times of Chinese development. The consultants warn that, at the level of quality, there is no difference with the Europeans. Others warn Japanese firms that their extreme attention to detail and conservative evolutions they may have left them behind. In question. Recasens’ words also emphasize the misgivings that have arisen among European manufacturers seeing how Chinese companies are arriving on our soil. With the intention of stopping the arrival of Chinese electric cars at knockdown prices, Europe applied variable tariffs to each brand depending on the supposed help they have received from the Chinese Government in the form of soft loans or the transfer of land. The promise is that they would not pay if they manufactured in Europe. But the first factories are also in question. Chery opted for assemble car kits in Barcelona. That is, cars that arrive almost assembled from the other side of the world and to which the final touches are given in the Spanish city. Now, the European Union is studying whether or not the electric Omoda 5 has to pay tariffs by understanding that added value is not being created around the production of said car. But not only Chery. The Chery case was the first but it has not been the only one. Stéphane Séjourné, vice president for Prosperity and Industrial Strategy of the European Commission, has assured the Italian newspaper La Stampa that the institution also has the factory in its sights BYD in Hungary or the plans that CATL has in Europe (including those that has in Spain with Stellantis). According to Séjourné, “it is not right” that these companies are manufacturing their cars in Europe with Chinese components and Chinese employees, noting that their investment in creating a local network of suppliers is minimal. A good example is the CATL battery production plant in Aragón where it is expected that employ 2,000 Chinese employees. Photo | ANFAC and Renault In Xataka | Before opening its gigafactory, Zaragoza has a pending task: create a “chinatow” for 2,000 Chinese workers

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.