15 Chinese car manufacturers are going to produce humanoid robots. They will use the same advantage that made them leaders

China is not late to humanoid robotics: it arrives with factories, suppliers, engineers and software already amortized, an advantage that is difficult to overcome. The supply chain of an electric car (sensors, motors, batteries, chips, perception algorithms…) overlaps by more than 60% with that of a humanoid robot, according to CITIC Securities estimates. XPeng, one of the most technological manufacturers in the sector, It also ensures that its robot reuses 70% of the same AI software as its cars.. If those numbers are real without many asterisks, the Chinese manufacturers of electric vehicles are not that they are aspirants to robotics, it is that they are clear favorites. The panoramic. Fifteen Chinese car brands have announced humanoid robot programs, according to the analysis firm Kaiyuan Securities. China already manufactures 70% of the components of “classic” industrial robotics, and the jump to humanoids takes advantage of the same factories, the same suppliers and the same talent that have given it leadership in electric vehicles. The parallel with what Tesla is doing with Optimus is inevitable, but China is running it with dozens of companies in parallel, at a speed that no single company can match. Between the lines. The bets diverge as much as the companies: Yes, but. There are dark clouds on the sunny day that is humanoid robotics for China. XPeng’s IRON robot crashed in a shopping mall in Shenzhen a few days ago. The company has been in robotics for six years. Driving on roads and moving through the rooms of each parent are very different problems. Roads have lanes, signs, and fairly predictable physics. The rooms have stairs, dozens of small objects, people moving, doors to open, intricate locations or chargers with a cable on the floor. The manual dexterity and dynamic balance required by a humanoid robot have no equivalent in the control architecture of any car. And the most talented engineers in the sector know it: several former XPeng executivesLi Auto and Huawei have left their companies to found their own robotics startups. When the path seems clear, the best are not afraid to go it alone. The contrast. Unitree, a pure robotics company with no ties to the automotive industry, distributed 5,500 robots in 2025. Agibot is approaching 1 billion yuan in revenue, about 122 million euros. These companies built from the ground up for robotics are already delivering their product while car manufacturers are still in the reorganization phase. The technological overlap between cars and robots is real in sensors and perception software, but it quickly thins out when the robot has to manipulate objects with great precision, maintain balance on uneven terrain, or work alongside humans. That last “frontier”, the 30% that does not transfer, may be where it is decided who dominates the industry. In Xataka | China manufactures 90% of the world’s humanoid robots and the reason is not its industrial policy: it is crossing the street Featured image | Xpeng

China gives the green light to the first level 3 autonomous cars. Their goal: to be leaders in 2035

China has given the green light to its first two passenger vehicles with capacity level 3 autonomous driving (L3). This will allow drivers to let go of the steering wheel in certain circumstances. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) announced this Monday that Changan Automobile and BAIC have received authorization to manufacture electric cars with this technology, although with geographical and speed limitations. What level 3 really means. Most current driving assistance systems in smart cars are classified as L2 or L2+, which force the driver to keep their hands on the wheel at all times. Level 3, considered “hands-off” according to the criteria of the international organization SAE, allows the vehicle to assume all dynamic driving tasks under specific conditions. However, the driver must remain alert and prepared to intervene when necessary. To put ourselves in context, level 5 would represent total autonomy, without the need for human intervention under any circumstances. The restrictions of the approved models. The model from Changan, a state-owned manufacturer based in Chongqing, will be able to navigate autonomously through urban streets and traffic at a maximum speed of 50 km/h when its assistance system is activated. For its part, the BAIC model under its Arcfox brand (the Alpha S sedan) is authorized to travel on highways and expressways at up to 80 km/h. Both vehicles, which are pure electric, will only be able to operate in specific areas: the Changan Deepal SL03 will be able to do so in certain sections of Chongqing, while the Arcfox Alpha S in specific sections of highways in Beijing that connect with the airports. Why China is accelerating now. The country is treating autonomous driving as another strategic objective, just as it did when promoting its electric vehicle industry, which is so popular abroad. The authorities have set the goal of making the country a leader in the sector by 2035. According to Zhang Yongweigeneral secretary of China EV100, two out of every three new cars sold in China this year will have Level 2 or higher autonomous driving capability. “The approvals show that the authorities are willing to deregulate the market,” says Phate Zhang, founder of CnEVPost, who anticipates that “officials are likely to take a phased approach to distributing more manufacturing licenses to other manufacturers.” The industry was already prepared. According to SCMP, several premium manufacturers have been with models ready to comply with level 3 regulations for months. Geely’s Zeekr and Seres, backed by Huawei Technologies, have designed and developed intelligent vehicles considered semi-autonomous that would comply with L3 rules, according to previous announcements. Andrew Fan, CFO of Hesai Group, the world’s largest manufacturer of lidar sensors, declared reported last month that “preparations were well underway in the Chinese auto industry for the next generation of autonomous driving capabilities, even before Beijing cleared the regulatory path.” The cost of the advanced lidar sensors needed for Level 3 ranges from $500 to $1,000 per unit, with demand rising as major Chinese manufacturers accelerate development of autonomous vehicles. Where is China compared to the West. Mercedes-Benz seems to have the advantage in this area: its Level 3 Drive Pilot system was approved by German authorities at the beginning of the year to operate at speeds of up to 95 km/h on the motorway network, marking the fastest certified system for conditional autonomous driving in a production vehicle, according to the company. Tesla continues to update its Full Self Driving system, which operates at an advanced level 2. Meanwhile, manufacturers like BMW and BYD also have models in testing for Level 3 driver assistance in Chinese cities like Beijing. What’s coming now. The MIIT has confirmed which will work with other authorities to supervise these vehicles while promoting the development of this technology in China. The two manufacturers will use the models to carry out pilot programs in assigned locations. Although the ministry has not specified when they will hit the market, technically manufacturers can begin assembling the models once they receive the green light. In addition to these two state-owned manufacturers, several robotaxis companies such as Baidu’s Apollo Go, Pony AI and WeRide They are already leading the deployment of driverless vehicles worldwide, operating at level 4, which does not require a human driver. Cover image | Wikipedia In Xataka | For the first time in 88 years, Volkswagen has crossed a red line: closing a factory in Germany

Trump’s dinner with Big Tech leaders has not been a dinner. It has been the greatest act of technological vassalage in history

On Thursday a unique act of vassalage took place. In him CEOS and leaders of the main technology companies Americans attended a dinner in which they paid supplies, without exception, to the president of the United States, Donald Trump. The scene, Continuation of another recentit was almost feudal and it was a spectacular demonstration of what is the balance of current power in the United States. What happened. Last week the White House advertisement That the first lady, Melania Trump, organized a meeting with the aim of creating a “shock force” to promote education in artificial intelligence. To that event They went The CEOs of the great US technology companies, among which they stood out: Tim Cook, Apple CEO Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft SUCBUL PICHAI, CEO of Google Mark Zuckerberg, Meta CEO Alexandr Wang, Excueo de Scale Ai Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI Grek Brockman, president of OpenAi Smooth his, CEO of AMD Safra Catz, CEO of Oracle Arvind Krishna, CEO of IBM Sergey Brin, Google co -founder Elon Musk, the great absent. They went to dinner 33 guests Among those who were those technological leaders, in addition to some administration officials and risk capital investors. There were nevertheless several notable absences: for example those of Andy Jassy, ​​CEO of Amazon – but did David clean (CEO of Blue Origin) and Jamie Siminoff, director of the firm – or that of Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia. The most striking was Musk’s He said in x that “I was invited but unfortunately I could not go” although there are data that suggests that I wasn’t on that guest list. Your relationship with Trump, Before idyllicis in the last times going through a much more complex phase in which both They have clearly distanced themselves. Thanks, Mr. President. During that dinner the CEOs of the great technological ones had a brief intervention that in all cases included a thanks aimed at President Trump. Altman, Gates, Nadella, Pichai or Zuckerberg left him evident in his speeches. The OpenAi CEO, for example, said “thank you for being a favorable president to business. It is a very refreshing change.” Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, followed that same line when heading to him: “” Thank you very much for gathering everyone and for the policies she has launched for the United States to lead. “ Tim Cook and his eight “thanks” in two minutes. The most striking of these participations was that of Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, who in two minutes said “thanks” to the president. The shared viral video on social networks has caused the occasional Meme For the surprising submission that Cook showed in his speech. The relationship between the two It is singular From the presidential elections. Modern technological vassalage. The scene was especially striking and in the shared videos on social networks, Trump is seen and the first lady sitting in the center of the table as dominant figures, while the people who currently shape the global economy. The scenery was spectacular: Silicon Vally giants basically went to a dinner in which they transmitted their total subordination to the US president. It was an even more forceful symbol that the one who lived at the investiture ceremony by Donald Trump. Looking for the president’s favor. These acts demonstrate what is the balance of power in the United States. It does not matter that the managers of these companies are responsible for much of the world economy: They all know That regulations, tax sanctions or vetoes can stop their innovation and billing, and Trump does not hesitate to play those letters if he considers it necessary. Political power is able to impose a regulatory framework, and companies know that they depend on that framework to operate. What times those on Facebook (for example) blocked Trump from his social networks. Silicon Valley is afraid. What is also evident is that the technological world in the US cannot be separated from state power. They depend on him antitrust regulations, digital infrastructure and of course gigantic and juicy government contracts. Being good with the US president is crucial for their businesses, and if you have to fold, they fold. That was not an exchange of impressions: it was a demonstration of who directs the score. Strategic calculation. The submissive position of technological leaders probably also responds to a strategic calculation: It is better to be docile in public and then negotiate regulatory benefits in private. The choreography shown at that dinner was full of meaning, because despite the power of the Big Tech, these companies are still anchored to the fact that the US president is a thickery of modern king to which they must pay vassalage so that they do not change the rules of the game in a second. Not so different from what happens in China. The scene also reminded us of a situation much more forceful: The one that is lived in China, where the government and its president, Xi Jingping, hold absolute power. Companies know it and for years have paid an absolute vassalage to their rulers, which intervene and make decisions in the operation and management of private companies. And those who try to rebel pay very expensive: to tell Jack Ma. In Xataka | Protect Trump is a headache, so the secret service has bought a armored golf car: the Golf Force One

We sensed that China and Russia leaders wanted to transcend in history. What we did not imagine was how much

Possibly, the moment that has most talk in the media during The military parade In China it has not been the Power shown By Beijing, but a conversation that lasted less than a minute among the leaders of China and Russia. “Before, it was rare to reach 70, but today, at 70, one is still a child,” Xi commented. “Reach immortality,” Putin replied. Because eternal “youth” has been a purpose of the president for years. An open micro. What happened was that An open microphone He captured an unexpected conversation between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin who showed not only his personal concerns, but also how biotechnology crosses the geopolitics. XI commented that in this century it could be possible for humans to live Until 150 years (“It is forecast that, in this century, you can also live up to 150“He said), while Putin, through a translator, spoke of organ transplants as a way towards perpetual youth and even” immortality. “ The scene, broadcast live on Chinese state television, offered an unusual intimate vision of two septuagenarian leaders who have eliminated mandate and maneuverado limits to prolong their permanence in power. An obsession. The Russian president He confirmed later The content of the talk, underlining that medical and surgical advances open the possibility of a much longer life. For years he has converted longevity in political priorityordering your Ministry of Health work in this field and encouraging state projects such as those of Rosatomwhich claims to develop techniques for “Print “human organs In laboratory. Your personal interest in health It is notorious: During the pandemic he imposed strict quarantine who had to meet with him and has promoted constitutional changes that would allow him to continue in power until 2036, when he would be 83 years old. In search of immortality. I counted in a The Times report That, in a context marked by the war in Ukraine and the demographic crisis that hits Russia, an official commission highlighted the priorities of the Kremlin elite: scientists from different institutions had received urgent orders from focus your research In anti -aging therapies, cell regeneration, immune reinforcement and advanced biomedicine, including 3D organ bioimpression. The initiative was Linked to Mikhail Kovalchuk77, nuclear physicist, president of the Kurchátov Institute and intimate friend of Putin, known both for his political influence and his personal obsessions. Kovalchuk also supervises a State Genetics Program in which the president’s eldest daughter, María Vorontsova, endocrinologist of training participates. Personal and political objective. Kovalchuk was described in the report as “crazy” For the idea of ​​eternal life, and it would have been the one who took the project directly to Putin, triggering a waterfall of ministerial orders that demanded immediate results. For some scientists, the mandate touched the absurd, by allocating resources to prolong the life of a septuagenarian elite while hundreds of thousands of young Russians die or are mutilated in the front. A source of the National Medical Center itself He defined it as “pure cynicism”, by prioritizing the rejuvenation of aged leaders on the rehabilitation of wounded soldiers. Conspiracy beliefs and esotericism. The background of these initiatives was mixed with the conspiracy vision that Putin and Kovalchuk share. The latter He has affirmed that the West develops biological weapons specifically directed against ethnic Russians and that the United States would have created a “subspecies of servants” with limited self -consciousness. Such ideas are intertwined with practices of Doubtful scientific base: Putin, despite having access to the best health, Supremely submit To bathrooms with bloods of siberian deer horns, a folkloric treatment that in Russia is attributed to rejuvenating and aphrodisiac properties. Pioneers of longevity. Death last year of Vladimir KhavinsonRussian longevity researcher marked the end of an influential figure in the development of rejuvenating drugs allegedly used by Soviet leaders such as Brézhnev. Although there are no solid evidence of its effective They would have appealed to your treatments. Its scientific legacy, halfway between biomedical research and pseudoscience, reflects the ambiguity of Russian policy in this field. The transhumanist dream. Beyond the Kremlin efforts, private figures also drive radical projects: Dmitri ITSKOVRussian billionaire, for years a initiative to transfer Human consciousness to artificial supports in 2035, with the promise of an indefinite life. In neighboring Kazakhstan, former president Nursultán Nazarbáyev claimed in 2010 that his scientists They will decipher the secret of immortality, although at 84 he still awaits the fruits of that effort. Examples that illustrate how the aspiration to prolong life has become a recurring obsession between Postsoviet elites. Chinese ambition. Returning to the meeting that took place yesterday with that audio between both leaders, by XI, remembered the New York Times that until now he had avoided public speaking about longevity in such ambitious terms as Putin, but showed that he shares at least the fascination with an extended life. At 72, he has suppressed the limits of mandate and seeks a fourth period in 2027 without having indicated a successor, which makes his physical and political stability intertwined. His reference at 150 years of life would fit his speech of “Take care of the elderly” and guarantee well -being in old age, although in their public image, visible age signals such as gray hair are already made, in contrast to the tradition of leaders that hide their aging. Historical context. Be that as it may, the moment occurred while both leaders, accompanied by Kim Jong-un, ascended to the Tiananmén Gate Tribune to witness a parade that showed The most advanced arsenal from China (Although not everything). That exhibition of military power, together with the conversation captured Random, it reflects the contrast between the ambition to perpetuate itself in power and the ability to project strength globally. The longevity, both personal and political, thus becomes a shared obsession: prolonging life not only of the leaders, but of the power system they represent. Between the sciencesymbolism and geopolitics, the conversation suggests that both Moscow and Beijing see in the “extension” of life a … Read more

The last to get to the China parade was Kim Jong Un. Because in North Korea the leaders do not fly, but they travel armored

Where is Kim Yong Un? The question shortly before the beginning of the Military Parade in Beijing For the 80th anniversary of victory over Japan and the end of World War II, it began to circulate among the attendees. The answer would come shortly after. Just because The missiles that North Korea He had shown hours before they fly at a vertiginous speed, the nation leaders do it slow and on land, but completely safe. A trip loaded with symbolism. The displacement of Kim Jong-un a Beijing represented much more than a simple transfer: it was his reappearance in the multilateral scene accompanied by an emblem of dynastic power, the known armored train as “the sun” (Taeyangcho). This convoy, painted green off and armored in each of its wagons, has been the means of favorite transport of the Kim family from the Foundation of North Korea, linked to both the personal security of the leader and the propaganda staging of the dynasty. Its use reinforced the continuity narrativetradition and strength in an event where state leaders of more than 20 countries coincided, including strategic allies such as Russia and Iran. The rail legacy. The train predilection comes from afar. Kim Il-Sung used it as Modernity symbol and closeness to the people, and Kim Jong-il made him Your exclusive vehicle for fear of flying, reaching a journey of thousands of kilometers Until Moscow in 2001. His trips were long expeditions in which the train became a residence, command room and meeting space with foreign leaders. After his death in 2011, occurred precisely on this train, one of his wagons was converted in exposed relic In his mausoleum in Pyongyang, consolidating the image of the railroad as an essential part of the cult of personality. Kim Jong-UN has continued tradition, although it combines the train with rented aircraft when travel demands to cross oceans, as happened at its summit With Donald Trump in Singapore In 2018. A armored office. Beyond tradition, the train is today an authentic Mobile Command Center. Their wagons have offices, meeting rooms, sofas, satellite communication systems, televisions and computers, in addition to a permanent bodyguard and medical staff. Security measures include Comprehensive armor and weapons Heavy on board, in addition to space to transport the leader’s own car. This infrastructure makes it an Rself -sufficient and safe efugiobut also in an extremely slow medium: its maximum round speed 60 km/hwhich, together with the precarious state of the North Korean roads, prolongs any journey for days. Thus, in 2019 he needed almost three days to reach Hanói from Pyongyang in his meeting with Trump. Luxury and ostentation. The train not only guarantees protection and functionality, it is also the scene of the excesses associated with the dynasty. For example, during the trips of Kim Jong-il, I They served live lobsters and delicacies of various international kitchens, while French wines arrived in air cargoes along the journey. They even organized shows on board with singers and actors to liven up displacements. Although similar anecdotes have not been documented in the era of Kim Jong-UN, South Korean intelligence services believe that the leader has inherited his father’s inclination by the Refined gastronomy and the ostentation. The train as a metaphor. So, “The Sun” It is much more than a vehicle: it symbolizes the rigidity of power that moves slowly, but with Absolute armorwrapped in luxury for the leader and sacrifice for the people. In each international trip, the image of the green convoy touring borders becomes a metaphor for the survival of an isolated regime, which combines tradition, ostentation and fear in equal doses. Kim Jong’s arrival a Beijing in this kind of strength about Raíles not only evoked his father and grandfather’s legacy, but sent the world a continuity message: The dynasty remains firm, armored against external threats and determined to maintain its rituals even in the era of hypersonic missiles and autonomous drones. Image | Heute In Xataka | China has just told the world the place it wants to occupy. And he has done it with a parade of weapons that seem like science fiction In Xataka | In 2021 North Korea drew a stage as a power. Russia and a secret base have turned the plan in four years

His two leaders have already made their bags

In recent months, Renault has seen how essential figures in its most recent success gave the company. As advanced Motorpasionthe most recent coup has been the march of Gilles Vidal, the designer responsible for the reinterpretation of the large surpluses of the company in the form of the Renault 5 e-tech, which has signed by Stellantis. This exit comes just weeks after Luca de Meo, CEO of Renault from 2020 and architect of the so -called “RENAULTION“will also announce your game to Assume new challenges Outside the automotive sector, specifically at the head of the Kering luxury group, owner of luxury fashion brands such as Gucci and Balenciaga. The combination of both dropouts supposes for Renault an authentic internal earthquake in full commercial boom of Your star car And just when the firm seemed to have overcome the worst moments after multimillionaire losses derived from the previous management. Gilles Vidal: The designer who redrawed the rhombus Gilles Vidal is not any designer in the European automotive industry. After 25 years in the PSA Group, where he was in charge of the design of projects such as the successful Peugeot 2083008 and 308, signed for Renault in 2020. His arrival coincided with a new era of products and a aesthetic rudder In Renault. With the Renault 5 E-Tech, Vidal’s team made the model named Car of the year in Europe 2025. His formula successfully checked The nostalgia of the 80s providing it with a toe technology: “With the new Renault 5 E-Tech Electric we have given on the nail,” said the design manager In an interview for Hybrids and electric. Now, Gilles Vidal returns to Stellantis, where he spent 25 years designing Citroën and Peugeot cars. Stellantis is reinforced and Renault seeks answers According to A statement From the French manufacturer, the arrival of Vidal to Stellantis will be effective on October 1, 2025, at which time he will assume the position of design director for the European brands of the automobile giant, replacing Jean-Pierre Ploué and reporting directly to Jean-Philippe Imparato, director of operations of Europe. On his new stage, Vidal has declared: “I am excited to return to my roots. In a world where technology and design must go hand in hand to transform the customer experience, I am excited about the challenges and opportunities that await us.” Meanwhile, Renault must face a double vacuum: leadership and design. With the departure of both responsible, the Rhombus brand must demonstrate whether the success that the Renault 5 is living is one day flower, or on the contrary, the fruit of a well -fixed strategy that marks the path of the future of Renault. He Renault 4 e-tech It is already in the exit box to check it. In Xataka | Renault is clear that the electric car is not the only way. Your future proposal: a plug -in hybrid of hydrogen Image | Renault

or are leaders or nothing

If something They are discovering companies that hire employees of generation Z, is that, definitely, they are not managed just like young millennials or generation X. communication and values of this generation They are very different to those of previous generations. For example, generation Z does not have the same concept of hierarchy and authority that their parents or grandparents, and therefore tend to speak with the same naturalness with the CEO of the company as with their colleagues. It is not the only peculiarity of this generation at work. No time for formalisms According to A recent study From the Indeed Employment Platform, it revealed that 93% of these young people admit have done “ghosting” to its employers, treating them as if they were a failed appointment. This is because They do not conceive the hierarchy in the same way that previous generations, prioritizing efficiency and results above the standards of label or social correction. Selena Rezzvani, expert in professional team leadership, said in a video In his LinkedIn profile that this should not be interpreted as disrespect since we are faced with the generation of Tiktok, Snapchap and social networks, where messages and communication are rapid, shocking and direct. There is no time of prolegomena and formalisms. In Reyes Suárez, HR Team Leader in Randstad Professionals, “it is more a clash of business culture and ways of understanding leadership. Generation Z is very assertive, but it has to improve its emotional intelligence, which have developed other previous generations that have lived another context.” Who is the boss? One of the keys is that the youth of the Z generation see the work dynamics as a collaboration networknot as a chain of command, so they prefer an accessible leadership with which to collaborate, not someone to obey without asking the objective of their work. In this context, Rezzvani ensures that the employees of generation Z respond to a leader who offers them transparency and that he is willing to admit their mistakes, and hits a wall when he appears to a boss as an authoritarian figure. Suarez stressed that establishing a close and direct relationship with them leads them to learn much faster Its functions, generating confidence between them. “Generation Z is much more demanding time, in the sense of claiming constant feedback and also giving it. In this sense, the previous generations were more independent.” A leader is done, it is not imposed According to A survey carried out by the consultant Robert Walters, 52% of the Z -generation professionals do not want to ascend to intermediate positions, and 72% would choose to continue their own professional growth instead of managing others. That is an indicator of Little value they give to the hierarchy “imposed” by seniority or status, and value much more those leaders who exercise as mentors and guides to learn. According to An article by Selena Rezzvani published in MSNBC“Having grown in an era where poor leadership was denounced publicly, they have developed the basic expectation that respect must be mutual,” said the leadership expert. This perception of hierarchical relationships in the company is the one that leads young people to not know how to communicate correctly with the more veteran authority figuresthat are presented as “bosses” to which to obey, while young people tend to recognize as leaders those who have gained their respect from trust. In Xataka | After this year one in three young people will have changed their jobs: it is nothing personal, it is only salary Image | Pexels

Cooperate for your good: why the clash with Petro is a Trump message for all world leaders

Image source, EPA Photo foot, The Trump government made Petro accept the terms of the deportations of migrants to Colombia. Article information Author, Anthony Zurcher Author’s title, BBC News 4 hours Less than a week after assuming the presidency, Donald Trump generated his first international tariff dispute. And the objective was not China, Mexico or Canada, frequent whites of its anger, but Colombia, one of the closest allies in the United States in South America. The crime of Colombia was to refuse to allow the landing of two American flights that transported deported migrants because they were military and non -civil planes. That seems to have been enough for Trump to release the hammer. “We will not allow the Colombian government to violate its legal obligations regarding the acceptance and return of the criminals who forced to enter the United States,” Trump published in his social media site. In addition to the 25% tariffs they offered to impose, Trump said that the United States would introduce a travel ban and would “immediately” revoke the visas to Colombian government officials, as well as their allies and supporters. At the last hours of Sunday, however, the Petro government announced that it had overcome the “Impasse“With the White House and declared that he would accept to receive migrants deported by the United States. During his first week in office, the US president seemed to prioritize migration executive measures over commercials, even if the latter were a key campaign promise. To emphasize that point, for the first time the president used tariffs to punish a country that, in his opinion, did not support the new hard line migratory policies of the United States. On a day when Trump had no planned public appearances (he is in his Miami resort, after having played golf in the morning), the president decided to give an example with Colombia. And with this, Trump is sending a warning to the allies and the adversaries of the United States equally: if they do not cooperate with the United States, the consequences will be severe. Image source, COURTESY OF THE WHITE HOUSE Photo foot, The White House published images of deported migrants in military aircraft. Work with other countries Although finally the Petro government accepted the terms of deportations after the president criticized his American counterpart in social networks, incoming officials have indicated that the United States immigration policy will require looking beyond the border with Mexico. The Trump candidate for Undersecretary of State, Christopher Landau, has long sustained that “working with other countries to stop those migratory flows” must be a “global imperative of US foreign policy.” However, Sunday’s dispute could make work together. Every year, tens of thousands of migrants from around the world, from India to China, go to the United States after landing in South America and traveling through the Darién cap, a key point in the north of the border with Colombia , and share with Panama. It is a dangerous trip, in which migrants usually face the presence of criminal gangs. Image source, Reuters Photo foot, The intersection of migrants for the Darién plug is a sensitive issue of discussion between Colombia and the US. United States retaliation measures could make Trump government work with Colombia on this issue. Petro alluded to this in his response to Trump’s actions, pointing out that if conversations about migration management through Darién are suspended, “illegal activities will increase.” These comments could be interpreted as an evening threat that more undocumented migrants will come. Petro hastened to say that his country would not reject the deported Colombian citizens of the United States, only that they should receive a “dignified treatment.” He even offered the use of his presidential plane as a means of alternative transport. However, the Colombian president was forced to accept the terms of deportations, after retracting in his position to respond to the United States with the implementation of tariffs similar to American products imported to Colombia. Although it was a Sunday of great drama, this sudden diplomatic confrontation was resolved. In any case, tariffs are proof of will. And Trump showed that this would be just his first movement. Subscribe here To our new newsletter to receive every Friday a selection of our best content of the week. And remember that you can receive notifications in our app. Download the latest version and act.

Marco Rubio threatened Taliban leaders in Afghanistan for kidnappings of Americans

The Secretary of State, Marco Rubiothreatened on Saturday to offer rewards for Taliban leaders in Afghanistandramatically raising the tone by saying that there may be more Americans detained in the country than previously believed. The threat occurs days after The government of Afghanistan and the United States will exchange prisoners in one of the last acts of former US President Joe Biden. The new US chancellor issued the harsh warning through social media, in a rhetorical style strikingly similar to that of his boss, President Donald Trump. “Just hearing that the Taliban has more American hostages than reported,” Rubio wrote in X. “If this is true, we will have to immediately put a VERY LARGE reward on his top leaders, perhaps even larger than what we had on Bin Laden,” he said, referring to the al Qaeda leader killed by US forces in 2011. Rubio did not describe who the other Americans may be, but there have long been accounts of missing Americans whose cases were not formally considered by the government to be unjust detentions. In the deal with the Biden administration, the Taliban released the most well-known American detained in Afghanistan, Ryan Corbettwho had been living with his family in the country and was captured in August 2022. He was also released William McKentyan American about whom little information has been disclosed. The United States, in turn, freed Khan Mohammed, who was serving a life sentence in a California prison. Mohammed was convicted of trafficking heroin and opium to the United States and accused of seeking rockets to kill American troops in Afghanistan. The United States offered a $25 million reward for information leading to the capture or death of Osama bin Laden shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and Congress later authorized the Secretary of State to offer up to $50 million. of dollars. No one is believed to have collected the reward for bin Laden, who was killed in a US raid in Pakistan. Keep reading:· The State Department imposes an immediate pause on US foreign aid.· Marco Rubio will visit four Central American countries with the mission of ending immigration· Marco Rubio promises González Urrutia support to restore democracy in Venezuela

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.