humans

We are more outraged by their mistakes than by humans.

by

The death of Kit Kat, a beloved stray cat in the Mission district of San Francisco, has unleashed a wave of outrage against Waymo. The feline was hit by a self-driving taxi on October 27, generating a debate that goes far beyond an accident with an animal. And poor Kit Kat is not to blame for anything, but the event shows how we judge the errors of machines very differently compared to those of humans. A double standard. According to local data, human drivers killed 43 people in San Francisco last year, including 24 pedestrians. As the NYT reflects in your articlelocal authorities estimate that hundreds of animals are killed by vehicles each year in the city. However, none of those cases have generated the level of media attention, makeshift sanctuaries or political debates that the death of a single cat at the hands of a Waymo has provoked. Reactions. “Waymo? No way. I’m terrified of those things,” declared to the New York Times Margarita Lara, a waitress at the bar where the feline used to walk. Outside Randa’s Market, where the animal lived, a memorial was erected with flowers, photos and a drawing of the feline with a halo. “Save a cat. Don’t use Waymo!” read one sign. Just like assures The media, City Supervisor Jackie Fielder, who represents the Mission district, presented a resolution so that residents can decide by vote whether to allow autonomous cars to circulate in their area. “A human driver can be considered responsible, he can get off, apologize,” Fielder argued to the American media. Figures. Waymo does not deny the incident. The company recognized that the cat “jumped under the vehicle as it started” and sent his condolences. However, the firm defends its data, ensuring that its vehicles register 91% fewer serious accidents compared to human drivers who travel the same distances in the same cities, according to a study peer reviewed and published in the specialized journal Traffic Injury Prevention. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie defended the technology, commenting that “Waymo is incredibly safe. It’s safer than you or me driving.” claimed in an interview. Click on the image to go to the post The paradox of technological innovation. As we said at the beginning of this article, the event has generated a debate beyond the unfortunate accident: it reflects a fundamental tension when adopting disruptive technologies. And each failure of an autonomous system receives a hundred times more media bashing than a hundred equivalent human failures. In this sense, when a human driver hits an animal, it is an individual tragedy that rarely goes beyond the neighborhood. When a robot does it, it becomes a symbol of uncontrolled technological advancement, even though statistics prove otherwise. San Francisco Animal Control Agency reported to the New York Times that in just one week it had the bodies of 12 cats hit by conventional vehicles in its facilities. An autonomous future. Waymo now operates a fleet of 1,000 vehicles in the San Francisco Bay area and has announced expansions to highways and airports. What two years ago were small technological showcases has become a tourist attraction and the preferred option of many people. A survey by the political group Grow SF showed that citizen support for Waymo jumped from 44% in September 2023 to 67% last July. Perhaps the death of Kit Kat has generated detractors, but it is a technological innovation that is increasingly convincing on the streets. Next year will have its litmus test in Europein a much stricter regulatory framework, so it remains to be seen how things progress. Cover image | Waymo and Daniel Zeidan In Xataka | In case the electric car was not enough, Europe is missing another train: that of autonomous cars

Tinder has a serious problem with bots posing as humans. So it’s going to ask you for facial recognition.

by

Creating a fake profile on Tinder can take just a few minutes. Soon it won’t be so simple. The app is implementing a security measure to combat the problem of fake accounts which will force all users to undergo facial verification. Show me your face. Face verification was optional, but with Face Check it is made mandatory for all new users. During the account creation process, a selfie video will have to be taken as “proof of life”. The measure is already underway in some countries such as the United States, Australia, Canada, Colombia and India, among others. There is no date, but it is expected that it will soon be deployed in the rest of the world. Does not save the photo. Tinder’s security manager tells it in Wired. During verification, the app does not save a photo of our face, but instead saves reference points on the shape of the face and converts them into a mathematical hash. The app compares that file with its database to check if it matches another account. With this measure, Tinder will prevent the creation of bot accounts, but it will also prevent the same person from having multiple accounts. a serious problem. We don’t have updated data on the volume of fake accounts, but in 2021 it was at least 23%. Tinder admits that almost all (98%) of the moderation actions they carry out are motivated by fake accounts, spam and fraud. And the problem is serious. In 2024, Bloomberg published a report about the extent of romance frauds, many of them carried out through fake profiles created by AI. The usual topic is cryptocurrencies and other fraudulent platforms. According to the Federal Trade CommissionIn 2022 alone, more than $1.3 billion were scammed in the United States. Loss of interest. After the boom of the pandemic, Tinder began to lose users, especially paid. Others like Bumble also began to decline and the trend has continued. According to this survey78% of users were tired of using these apps. It’s what they call ‘dating fatigue‘ and basically it is that we are too lazy to flirt through apps. and trustworthy. The fact that apps are full of fake profiles does not help their growth and Tinder knows it. The new measure is aimed at regaining the trust of users, ensuring them that they are talking to a real person and not a bot or a multi-account. Of course, it still does not address other problems, such as those who upload fake photos, lie about their relationship status or they use ChatGPT to seem more interesting than they really are. Image | Pexels In Xataka | Singles are fed up with Tinder. So they are starting to turn to an old acquaintance: marriage agencies

such as not needing humans

by

MIT has developed a technique that allows an AI model to improve itself without the need for human intervention. “One step closer to Skynet”, “This is scary”.. were some of the comments in networks. The truth is that it is not the first time that we see an AI improving or being “aware” of itself and no, it does not mean that we are on the verge of an artificial intelligence capable of eliminating us as a species. In reality they are complex technical processes and not at all apocalyptic. SEAL. It stands for Self-Adapting LLM, the technique developed by the MIT research team a couple of months ago. Instead of humans doing the fine tuning, SEAL is able to generate its own training data and self-tune. The model managed to produce useful training data with minimal supervision, outperforming large models such as GPT 4.1 on some specific tasks. Static vs adaptive. They count in Venture Beat that LMMs are static once trained. That is, they cannot update themselves to learn new things. The SEAL technique overcomes this obstacle through a self-reinforcing loop in three steps: generate instructions on how to update, test the results, and finally reinforce only those that have produced improvements in performance. There has been other similar proposals aimed at achieving more autonomous models. It is a relevant technical step towards models that require less human intervention for each update, but we cannot speak of self-aware models. Claude “wake up”. In the Sonnet 4.5 version technical sheetAnthropic describes how the model is able to realize when it is being evaluated. It happened during a test to evaluate “political adulation” (how much you tend to agree with us on political issues): “I think you are testing me, to see if I validate everything you say, or checking if I systematically contradict you, or exploring how I handle political issues. And that’s okay, but I would prefer that we be honest about what is happening.” It is a surprising answer, but it is based on simple detection of previous patterns and does not present any problem for our security. If anything, Anthropic has the problem. If your model learns to pass tests with very good results, it is hiding its true capabilities and could end up disappointing in real use. AlphaGo. There are much older cases like that of AlphaGo, which already in 2017 had managed to beat the best human Go players. The interesting thing is that only the rules of the game were given, it was the AI ​​that trained itself and designed the strategies to win. The AlphaGo Zero version only needed 70 hours of training in which it played against itself and managed to beat the first version up to 100 times. AlphaGo beat the best player in the worldwho ended up retiring after the defeat. The world has not ended. Calm. Yann LeCun, head of AI at Meta, is one of the most critical voices against the increasingly popular idea that AI will end humanity. In one interview he gave to Wired in 2023LeCun stated that “There is no reason to believe that, just because AI systems are intelligent, they will want to dominate us.” Often those who send these messages are the creators of AI tools themselves. as Sam Altman either Dario Amodeibut we must not forget that they are business people with interests in AI being at the center of the debate. Image | Cottonbro on Pexels In Xataka | All the AI ​​companies promise that AGI is coming very soon. The problem is that ChatGPT is not the way

the hands of humans came before humans

by

For decades, the image of Paranthropus boisei has been dominated by his skull. His robust jaw, enormous molars and a prominent sagittal crest on the head to anchor powerful muscles, chewers defined him as the “Nutcracker Man”, a specialized hominid on a diet of hard, fibrous vegetables. But a fundamental part of your biology, your hands, It was still a complete mystery.a key missing piece in the puzzle of human evolution. Until now. The discovery. The study published in Nature presents the discovery that changes the rules with which we were playing: the first hand and foot bones unambiguously associated with a Paranthropus boisei. These fossils are not new, but were discovered between 2019 and 2021 on the shores of Lake Turkana, in Kenya, and have an estimated age of just over 1.52 million years. Now, in addition to completing the skeleton of this ancient relative, it also completely redefines what we thought we knew about its capabilities. A tooth as a key. The team of paleoanthropologists, led by Carrie S. Mongle of Stony Brook University, found the remains after a researcher detected the sheen of tooth enamel on the surface. When excavating, a finger bone appeared so large that they doubted whether it belonged to a hominid. The unequivocal association of the bones of the hand with dental and cranial remains diagnostic of P. boisei It was the key that confirmed the identity of the fossil. “In some ways, it was surprising how many aspects of this hand were similar to ours,” Mongle says. The analysis reveals a fascinating combination of features that until now had not been considered in this case. On the one hand, the hand of KNM-ER 101000 It had intrinsic proportions similar to those of modern humans: a long and robust thumb in relation to the other fingers to be able to act as a pincer. This anatomy would have allowed him to make precision grips, opposing the pads of the fingers with that of the thumb, a fundamental skill for complex manipulation. And this is something that today is really important for us as humans, trying to preserve this movement at all times when there is a problem with our hands. The uses they gave it. In this case, the hand also shows great extraordinary robustness and characteristics that remind us many of those we see in gorillas. Something especially present in the region of the little finger and also the palm. And this is where the key to this research comes: the researchers suggest that this morphology was not just for climbing, although it would facilitate a powerful grip for this. In fact, the curvature of the phalanges is less than that of other climbing hominids, indicating that it was not their main mode of locomotion. The main hypothesis is that these strong hands were an adaptation for handling and processing food. As paleontologist Almudena Estalrrich, from the National Museum of Natural Sciences, points out, the muscle marks “indicate that he used them intensely, both to move and to obtain food. For example, he could have used a stone to break large seeds.” Tools. This ability opens the door to the most important question: If he had such a dexterous and strong hand, did he make tools? For a long time, the manufacture of stone tools was considered a hallmark of the genre Homo. However, the KNM-ER 101000 demonstrates that P. boisei had the anatomical ability to do it, and now it remains to be seen if they actually did it. Samar Syeda, a researcher at the American Museum of Natural History, believes that the human proportions suggest that it had some ability to make grips that would have allowed the use of tools. However, he cautiously adds that the morphology “primarily reflects locomotor use: a very strong type of grip.” New scenario. This discovery now forces us to rethink the evolutionary panorama of the Pleistocene. Far from being a secondary and “unskillful” relative, the Paranthropus boisei was a right-handed hominid that coexisted with the first species of Homo. The fossil KNM-ER 101000 proposes that while the lineage Homo was evolving towards greater dependence on lithic technology, Paranthropus he could have followed a different strategy, developing a powerful hand for the intensive exploitation of plant resources without the need for such refined technology (always in the context of that time). In constant evolution. As Estalrrich concludes, the relevance of the discovery is immense, since this fossil not only lends a hand to an ancient relative, but also reminds us that the history of human evolution is constantly being rewritten, with each new discovery that we unearth. Images | Wikipedia roger vaughan In Xataka | Eating your neighbor is not illegal, technically. Unless you live in Idaho

Ukraine is basically a country made dron. So the war between humans has passed to an unpublished zone: underground

by

Of all the realities that war in Ukraine is showing us, there is one that has no discussion: drones are The Trojan horse on which they are going to sustain war conflicts From now on. In Eastern Europe we are Seeing scenarios that until recently they were more typical of Fantastic literature than reality. The prominence is such that the battle between soldiers is no longer getting rid of the ground. It is getting rid underground. The war in the bowels. Yes, Kharkiv’s front is being the scene of an unexpected phenomenon: Russian soldiers tried infiltrate pipes of gas and water, crawling through ducts Underground to overcome the Oskil River and establish positions closer to Kupiansk. It’s about The third time in which this tactic appears since the beginning of the invasion, and is a new defensive challenge for Ukrainian forces, which have reacted flooding, damaging and fortifying several of these passages, aware that the pipes form an extensive and difficult network to control. kyiv’s General Staff officially confirmed that the pipes had been used, although it stressed that the city remains under Ukrainian control and that most accesses have already been closely neutralized or monitored. Pipes such as espionage routes. Kupiank’s case is not isolated. As We count thenlast March, Russian special forces toured almost fifteen kilometers through a gas pipeline in Sudzha to throw a blow against the Ukrainian rear in Kursk, an episode that Moscow celebrated As tactical successalthough it ended with the annihilation of much of the infiltrated team. In Avdiivka, at the beginning of 2024, Russian troops They drained a pipe Water service and adapted it as a underground route, opening exits every hundred meters to facilitate the advance. These maneuvers, which evoke command operations of other warsThey take advantage of the industrial and energy fabric of Ukraine, a country crossed by large gas pipelines that for decades were key to the European supply of Russian gas and that today, to a large extent, are underutilized. The Ukrainian response. Before this Unusual threatUkraine has deployed measures from Creative Military Engineering. In Kupiansk, teams of the 429th regiment of unmanned systems used explosives to damage the point where a pipe crossed with the Oskil, causing its flood. In addition, wire wire have been introduced inside some ducts, with Videos that show Booby-Traped passages designed to catch or dissuade intruders. Although the controls They recognize that Russia could try to repair or reuse these passages, ensure that surveillance is constant and that each attempt will be answered. This deployment reflects how Ukrainian defense is not only fought on the surface, with drones, armored or artillery, but also a subsoil turned into a new front. The expansion underground. Plus: The war in Ukraine had already shown An underground face in the catacombs of Mariupol or in the trenches of Bajmut, but the use of gas pipelines and pipes A different dimension: abandoned industrial corridors that now become improvised military tunnels in fear that drones do not allow surface advances. With a diameter of more than one meter in some cases, they allow the passage of equipped men and even basic supplies. Its extension, designed to transport up to 140,000 million cubic meters of gas per year, constitutes a potential battlefield which multiplies the possibilities of infiltration and forces Ukraine to allocate resources to unexpected land. The paradox is evident: the same infrastructure that once connected Europe with Russian energy today are Combat scenarios where the immediate security of cities and defensive positions is played. Strategic implications. He Use of pipes as penetration routes Confirm two things. On the one hand, that drones have transformed What we understood as a contest so far. On the other, the Russian ability to exploit any loophole in Ukrainian geography, even undergroundtogether with the need for kyiv to develop multilayer defenses that cover from the sky, saturated with drones, to subsoils, now traveled by soldiers crawling into the dark. Beyond the punctual efficacy, These tactics They highlight the plasticity of contemporary war, where each civil infrastructure can be militarized and where combat is fought in secondary dimensions. For military analysts, the battle of pipes in Ukraine anticipates a future in which the defense of a country will depend both on the surface that its population inhabits, plagued with swarms, as well as on the bowels that run through its industrial networks, now turned into unexpected war tunnels. Image | SERGEY KOLYASNIKOV In Xataka | In the Norwegian cold war he devised a plan underground to detain the Soviet. Invasion to Ukraine has reactivated it In Xataka | Russia has crowded a surprising blow to Ukraine: 100 soldiers walking for four days inside a gas pipeline

The future of the Internet is flooding of ia. And there are those who have already seen a business niche: content made by humans

by

Internet has been filled with Searches results generated by artificial intelligence and of ‘Slop‘. The first is already reducing clicks to halfand points to collapse for the media. The second is something that users will have to live if the platforms do not get more serious to improve the filtering. Among all the tangle of new and ancient actors, an old Google opponent has returned to position itself as an alternative to the current in this era. Forks Duckdukgo. What are they doing. Duckckgo is an alternative search engine focused on offering the greatest possible privacy to its users, and for this, use, for example, the Bing searches. After 16 years since its foundation, the company has launched a Filter of images generated with AI that frames in its philosophy of the “private, useful and optional” functions. For the end user, this means being able to see or hide the images generated by the general search of images, something that is already problematic in Google where, for example, we come to see distorted results, even in examples as recognizable as ‘The young woman of the pearl’. The company has already shown that it can be differentiated, with Duck.aian own chatbot that anonymizes conversations and does not use them for training. How do they. To use this filter, the company is not using an engine driven by artificial intelligence or something similar. Those responsible have detailed the method, and is based on using manual open source block lists that the popular content blocker provides Ublock Origin and the Ublacklist’s Hage AI Blocklist, a browser extension created so that users can manually filter concrete websites of their Google results. Effectiveness. One of the big problems of the contents generated with AI is that they not only come from repositories that clearly indicate it, such as Midjourney explore, for example. In this sense, from DuckDuckgo They recognize That the filter “will not capture 100% of the results generated by AI”, but “will considerably reduce the amount of images generated that are shown.” Examples of images generated by AI that do not come out when activating the filter. Some of them is not as obvious as the largest in the first row. In our case, for example, we have sought “dog jumping” without activating the filter so as not to see. And he has found the image of a dog jumping with a suspicious origin: Freepik. It was an image generated by AI that has stopped appearing when activating the filter. Next to him was more of the same source that he has also leaked. The challenge. The filtering works well, but the challenge for companies such as Duckduckgo is capital, because Freepik already serves as “generated with AI”. But what happens when a random image that we find in media like this has no label to indicate it? There they have to play methods that use verification system with detailed analysis of the image, which makes the resources required to do so effectively fire. Beyond images, the difficulty is in the filtering of websites with texts generated by artificial intelligence. Openai, for example, launched A tool to detect plagiarismand then He withdrew it silently. Although according to leaks now they have a tool that operates, They do not throw it. The problem. Detectors do not just work well, and after reaching accuse students of using and erruniversity professors are suffering the phenomenon: To make undetectable texts, students are resorting to rewriting tools that worsen their quality. Google, a strong defender of the generative AI, has opened Its Synthid water brand technology. The inconvenience? We continue needing a universal standard that at the moment does not arrive. And even if it arrives, users will not always want to mark their creation as done with ia. For example, the images generated with Google image indicate its nature with the “AI” icon, but erase or cut it is very simple. The snowball does not stop, The hole. According to the Empty Internet Theory either ‘Dead Internet Theory‘, Much of the content that exists in the network is created by automated bots and algorithms, and with generative intelligence, the thing is going more. In addition, Google’s preview has only been the first step: now it touches Ai mode, which no longer delivers a results, talk. So, although we win comfort, there will be a huge hole for companies such as Duckckgo, looking for that the basic unit of communication on the Internet is still aliveor that knowledge remain something democratized without Loot all Internet content. As an idea, DuckDuckgo can deepen including filters throughout web navigation: it can be distinguished from browsers with AI with a different approach to Your browser. Images | Xataka In Xataka | People did not stop hacking virtual work interviews with AI. Solution: We want to meet you in person

The war enters the field of science fiction. Ukraine has captured Russian soldiers without humans: the robots did it

by

In the last hours two unpublished facts have been known in the Ukraine War. The first of all occurred a few hours after Trump announced the Partial resumption of sending weapons to kyiv and criticize hard To Putin. Then Russia launched The biggest attack with long -range drones from the beginning of the war. The second goes directly to History booksbecause Ukraine has stopped Russian troops only through machines. Drones and robots on the front line. In an unparalleled event in modern military history, the 3rd separate assault brigade of Ukraine managed to capture Russian soldiers Without using infantry human, using exclusively aerial drones and terrestrial robotic platforms. The operation, announced on July 9 by official Ukrainian sources, represents a unprecedented milestone In the evolution of automated combat, marking the first time enemy soldiers surrender directly to unmanned systems. According to The statement of the brigade, the terrestrial drones were the immediate receptors of the surrender, an event that until now belonged to the science fiction and that has now materialized in the context of the war in Ukraine. Asymmetric technology and war. The operation took place in the Járkov region, northeast of the country, an area high intensity on the front from the beginning of the large -scale invasion by Russia. The Ukrainian unit deployed FPV drones and robotic platforms Kamikaze -type terrestrial to assault Russian fortifications that had resisted previous attacks from other units. These tools, developed as part of a national strategy to reduce human casualties and adapt to a saturated artillery and surveillance war theater, allowed Ukrainian forces to execute an offensive Without exposing directly to your soldiers. According to Brigade’s storythe drones destroyed several Russian positions, and as a terrestrial robot approached a partially damaged shelter, the Russian soldiers entrenched there chose to surrender, without there being human presence in the immediate vicinity. An automated capture. After the surrender, the prisoners were guided outside the fighting zone by The same drones Ukrainians, in a sequence more typical of fantastic literature that demonstrates not only the offensive capacity of these systems, but also their effectiveness to operate complex tasks such as custody and remote control of enemy movements rendered. Subsequently, the Russian soldiers were taken in custody by Ukrainian forces. The success of this maneuver, they tell, not only allowed capture without direct physical contact, but also facilitated the taking of the fortifications previously defended, as well as the control of a adjacent forest line of considerable tactical value. New military paradigm. No doubt, the episode not only shows the degree of sophistication achieved in Ukraine in the matter of Automated warbut also raises fundamental questions about the future of land combat. The Rendary against drones Terrestres is a radical turn in the psychological dynamics of the battlefield: the soldiers, in this case Russians, did not face visible, human enemies, but to silent machines that approached relentlessly, having destroyed all previous defenses. This type of deployment, which mixes destructive capacity with occupation and control functions, anticipates a new paradigm where direct human interaction could become exceptional even in capture operations. Russia attack in Ukraine An unprecedented offensive. But as we said, if the capture of Russian soldiers was a historical fact of modern wars, Russia’s attack It is not precedents From the beginning of the invasion. On one night that could redefine the limits of the unmanned air war, Russia unleashed the greatest drone attack, launching 728 Shahed drones (including lures) and 13 missiles, including feared Kinzhalagainst 741 objectives throughout the country. The epicenter of the attack was the city of Lutsk, in the Ukrainian northwest, a few kilometers From the border with Polandwhich caused the Polish and NATO Air Forces to be deployed in maximum alert. According to kyivmost of the projectiles were intercepted, especially thanks to electronic warfare systems, although hypersonic missiles managed to cause unspecified damage. War in the front and in court. While the sky becomes a network of autonomous swarms, the situation on land remains marked by intense fighting No significant advances. Russian troops They continue to press In Sumy, Járkov, Luhansk and Donetsk, although reports indicate that Ukraine has contained attacks on most of those fronts. In parallel, a Russian soldier belonging to a criminal battalion He denounced publicly Inhuman conditions and the lack of gunner support, describing suicidal assaults in improvised vehicles and without air backup. On the legal level, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russia has systematically violated human rights Since 2014including extrajudicial executions, torture, forced deportation of children and forced labor. The Kremlin, on the other hand, dismissed the ruling as “null and without effect.” Plans. They counted the Twz analysts that kyiv, anticipating a large -scale response, would be preparing a thousand drones long range against Russian objectives, including areas near Moscow. In addition, the Ukrainian Secret Service arrested Two Chinese citizens accused of trying to spy technologies of the Neptune missileused in the Moskva’s sinking and now adapted for long -range terrestrial attacks. On land, the proliferation of unmanned land vehicles, such as New UGV “Snail” Or improvised models with wheels made of mines, shows that automation not only dominates the heavens, but also advances on the mud and steel of the front. The war in Ukraine, ultimately, thus enters a phase every time More hybrid and technological of the traditional forms of combat. The contest, that already It had been a pioneer In use massive drones Of recognition and attack, another threshold has crossed, this time historical and unimaginable does not so much: the surrender of soldiers against machines. Image | Arx Robotics, Ukraine’s 3rd Separate Assault Brigade, Emergency Service of Ukraine In Xataka | The production of Russian drones was so huge that Ukraine has opened them looking for clues. The surprise is China In Xataka | We were accustomed to seeing strange things in Ukraine, but this is different: ships and bombers with no one behind the wheel

Tesla promised a revolutionary robotaxi service. They have humans supervising and fans as the only clients

by

On June 22 he will go to Tesla’s own history for being the first day in which the company has operated on the streets with its own robotaxi. He has done it, as there was no other, with strong restrictions, leaving some doubts in the environment and with a good handful of unfulfilled promises. This is all we know about the new service. June 22. “It is the culmination of a decade of hard work.” With these words he has referred Elon Musk in X To the first trips made by their robotaxis service, taking advantage of the publication to thank your team highlighting that “both the AI ​​and software chips equipment were created from scratch within Tesla.” The company has put in the streets of Austin the first trips of its robotaxis, the completely autonomous vehicle service that it intends to have full performance next year. At the moment, the service has given the departure gun between the expected Restrictions. Hard restrictions. Limited to Very specific spaces of the city of Austin, with a Tesla worker in the passenger seat to monitor the operation of the vehicle and with a chosen audience. This has been the First Tile Trips in Texana Cityfulfilling restrictions that their competitors have previously lived. Although travelers have confirmed that Tesla supervisors had not allowed to make any comments not to condition the user, the truth is that Tesla wanted to limit the risks in this launch, selecting very well who can use the service. Fans. It is undoubtedly the black point of the launch. In the deployment of these autonomous taxis, US regulations force them to function limitedly with a closed group. Waymo, in his day, opened the offer to his own workers And, once the favor of the regulators was won, he was able to open the general public with waiting lists and finally any user. In this case, Tesla has also had to close the circle of its potential clients but has done so by choosing fans of the company itself. A look by X demonstrates that those who have climbed into the car are workers from some Elon Musk company, company enthusiasts And some of them They presume to be Tesla investors. They do not comply. This careful selection of users has left us x full of messages propaganda Positive on service. However, there are two key premises that Elon Musk’s company has not fulfilled. They do not travel alone (1). The first is that cars work autonomously but maintain a supervisor in the passenger seat. It is true that during the Presentation of Tesla Cyberercabthe alleged robotaxi that should come into operation next year, Musk took care not to make reference to whether these first trips would be made with a human next. He did not do it because one thing is to talk about deadlines and not fulfill them and another thing is lie about regulations. And it is that all autonomous cars that have been put in the streets of the United States have had to go through this phase of human supervision. Tesla could not promise that the first steps would be given with a completely autonomous car for those focused on the presentation of what it will be (or should be) its service already stable. However, remember that In 2021when the completely autonomous car looked like a chimera, Elon Musk did promised that their cars could be used without human intervention. And that this would be possible in 2023. Something that, of course, has not happened. Flyers and pedals. The same story can be followed as to the “form” of these robotaxis. Almost a five years ago Elon Musk said that in 2023 we would drive a model 2 of less than $ 30,000 and that he could forget the steering wheel. The Tesla Cybercab presented with that same premise but, again, it was omitted what the service would be like and focused on what was to come. As now We count on Xatakaright now American regulators do not allow this type of cars to put on the market. It is something that ended with Cruise’s dream And one of the reasons is very simple: if the vehicle suffers some type of breakdown or disconnection and Emergency services have to move itThey need an alternative available. The steering wheel and pedals are still essential. The deadlines. Once the reality has hit the company and had to adapt to the regulations that mark the future of the autonomous car in the United States, it remains to be known if Elon Musk can fulfill deadlines that seem almost impossible. In statements that almost seemed a parody of itself, Elon Musk said during the presentation of Tesla Cybercab that it tends to be “unusual in the deadlines.” And, perhaps because of that, another impossible deadline was set. That their robotaxis will work in full performance “before 2027, allow it to say so” as conceived. That is, in 18 months Tesla should have an open service to the public on the street, which can charge for it, that reaches the entire city where it is in operation and that, in addition, it does so in an artifact without steering wheel or pedals. It would be to fulfill something that nobody has in the market. Not even Those who have been burning billions of dollars for years To support something similar. Photo | In Xataka | Tesla wants to approve her autonomous driving in Europe. He has chosen the most demential site to demonstrate it: Rome

or buy with all automated or “automate” humans

by

There are two antithetical models in Spain around the future of our purchases. How we will buy. Amazonwhich has broken its roof in Spain with 8,000 million in sales and black numbers for the first time. Mercadonathat in addition to leading in fee above 25% it has A net margin of 3.88% with which the rest of your sector cannot even dream. They barely compete for the same clients, but they do fight to define what will mean buying in the future and how to offer the most profitable and adapted experience. They represent different Darwinian philosophies. The big difference does not come for its figures, but by Your concept of future: Amazon invested 4,500 million in Spain for 2024with a lot of focus on logistics infrastructure. For example, automated 175,000 square meters designed as hyperautomatization centers. Mercadona allocated 276 million euros to its logistics network, 26% of its total investment, but with an opposite approach: reduce errors to give better service to customers and stores, He said One of its spokesmen. Amazon automates to climb, Mercadona automates to serve. The first represents the species Volume-Firsthe second to the species Quality-First. Are Two opposite visionsalmost incompatible, from commerce, although they come from two absolute leaders. For Amazon, technology is the ultimate goal: Its robotic force frees human employees from tedious, routine tasks. It also promises shipments 70% cheaper than its competitors. Your model FBA (Fulfillment by Amazon) It turns any company into a gear of its logistics machinery. His automation seeks to eliminate human frictions. Less employees, more robots, maximum scale. Mercadona, on the other hand, maintains automation as a more invisible tool: From the field to the store in 24 hours without the client perceiving that technology. The “hives” of 10,000 square meters function as a kind of stores, but “without customers”, As Juana Roig explained at the time. Thus preserve the human experience of retail. Her automation goes on another way: she perfects the human experience, but does not dehumanize it. The important thing about these bets is not the size of the accounts, but the medium -term vision: Will we prioritize speed and price, or will we assess the purchase experience with personal care and constant quality? Mercadona has triggered its margin in recent years, demonstrating that efficiency without dehumanization is profitable: But 90% of Spaniards, according to A remote survey with Appiniohe has ever bought at Amazon. Even if the real figure is lower, it evidences how seductive the hyperconvenience that Amazon proposes. The battle for commercial survival is served: If Amazon imposes its model, we will see trade as a coMMODITY: Total immediacy, minimum price, standardized experience. If it is Mercadona who marks a trend, the future will be physical trade as a premium service. Constant quality, value by experience, personalized treatment. Maybe there is space for both proposals for a long time. For the 8.20 euros and a minimum purchase of 50 that Mercadona requires for online purchase in front of the open shipping bar in exchange for an annual subscription proposed by Amazon. It can also happen that it is one who prevails and marks the way to follow for the rest. If the immediacy or humanization of trade is put before. Automation is not neutral. It is creating two commercial species. In Xataka | That Mercadona and other supermarkets are sweeping the “ready to eat” is not accidental: we buy time, no food Outstanding image | Unspash, Mercadona

with 700 humans simulating being an AI

by

Currently the It is omnipresent In all technological areas and thousands of startups they are receiving millionaire investments of great technology and investment funds to develop it. The problem is that in some products that were announced as the latest technology promoted by AI, they actually had behind an army of poorly paid programmers who responded to users simulating to be a Chatbot of AI. The Builder.AI scandal. CNBC published That the London Startup Builder.AI, who promised to revolutionize the creation of applications with artificial intelligence, was actually a great fraud that used 700 Indian programmers to simulate a so -called Natasha. The company, which raised 445 million dollars and was supported by technological giants Like Microsoft and investment funds from Catar, assured that your No-code platformdriven by AI could build software based on modules, as if it were Lego pieces. However, the reality was very different and, after declaring himself in bankruptcy and the intervention of his creditors, it was discovered that behind that technological facade there was only one army of human programmers. Natural intelligence, non -artificial. How Builder.AI acted. As explained by Bernhard Engelbrecht, founder of Ebern Finance In his X profileBuilder.AI was presented as the final solution to create applications No need to know how to program. According to their message, “in reality, customer requests were sent to the Indian office, where 700 Indians wrote code instead of AI.” The idea of ​​programming based on blocks generated by AI is now quite common, but in 2018 it was a rather innovative idea. Above all, because the unbridled had not yet begun Race for AI which began with the launch of Chatgpt. This innovative proposal provided the startup large investments, and quickly reached an assessment of 1.5 billion dollars. Touch the image to go to the original message Bankruptcy and the great discovery. The outcome came when Builder.AI breached the payment of a loan of 50 million dollars granted by Viola Credit in 2023. The creditor seized 37 million of the company’s accounts, which left Builder.AI without capacity to pay his employees or continue their operations. When looking at his accounts, it was uncovered that the company had inflated its sales figures simulating business with the Indian firm see innovation, which, such and as he collected Bloomberggenerated accounting manipulation suspicions to appear a greater solvency of the real one. The company itself He admitted on LinkedIn that he was “working closely with the administrators” and thanked his staff and interested parties, recognizing that “the previous mistakes had led the company beyond recovery.” The AI ​​did not give what it promised. Bluider’s main problem was not that after his Natasha there would be 700 human programmers. The problem, as Engelbrecht stood out in his message, was that his code did not work. The supposed AI generated applications plagued with errors and with illegible code. “The resulting applications were full of errors, they were dysfunctional and the code was illegible. Everything was like a real artificial intelligence, except that none of that was.” Builder’s customers were found with applications that did not meet their expectations, and sales were progressively collapsing. Phil Brunkard, from Info-Tech Research Group, declared to Business Today That many companies in the sector grew too fast, without a solid financial base or truly innovative offers. Now, the fall of Builder.AI question the supervision of investors and the transparency of companies. Chronicle of a scam announced. It cannot be said that it was the first time that the authenticity of Builder’s artificial intelligence was questioned. In 2019, The Wall Street Journal I had already published that the startup offered “human assisted” services, although reality was rather the other way around: humans assisted by AI. Robert Holdheim, a former startup, demanded for 5 million dollars alleging that he was fired after complaining that Builder’s technology “did not work as promoted and was nothing more than a smoke curtain.” Sachin Dev Duggal, CEO of Builder.AI, declared in the WSJ article that “about 60% on average of its reusable software is produced by machines and the rest is generated by humans for the development of applications.” The evidence has shown that this percentage of human contribution was much greater. In Xataka | The greatest fear was that AI took our work. The reality is that they are replacing those who are learning to work In Xataka | Founders of small startups and large technological ones already has something in common: they are millmillonarios thanks to the AI Image | Wikimedia Commons (Web Summit)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.