The reason why Generation Z is giving up alcohol

For years, alcohol has been an almost inherent to youth leisure. But something is changing. The generation Z drinks less than the previous ones and not only for a health or economic issue: you begin to perceive alcohol as a factor that directly affects your mental well-being, your ability to concentrate and, consequently, your daily productivity. It is not a moral crusade nor a total renunciation of consumption. It is a change of relationship with respect to alcohol and its subsequent consequences. Generation Z drinks less than millennials. The data confirm that it is not an isolated perception. According to FortuneGeneration Z consumes around 20% less alcohol than millennials at the same age, a sustained drop seen in several Western countries. That is, the alcohol is still present, but loses prominence in youth leisure. According to data From the Survey on Alcohol and other Drugs in Spain (EDADES), in 1997 12.7% of the population aged 15 to 64 claimed to drink daily, in 2007 it was already 10.2% and in 2024 this percentage was barely 9%. Hangxiety: the hangover that cannot be seen. Generation Z has grown up with greater access to information about mental health, basic neuroscience, and emotional well-being. This has changed the perception of alcohol, which is no longer seen just as fun and is now understood as an element with clear cognitive costs. One of the concepts that best explains this change is that of “hangxiety”, which Guardian defined such as the anxiety that appears after alcohol consumption, even when the physical hangover is mild. The alcohol alters neurotransmitters such as GABA and serotonin, generating a rebound effect that can translate into anxiety, irritability and ruminative thoughts the next day. For a generation especially sensitive to anxiety and mental healththis effect is especially dissuasive. Less alcohol, more cognitive stability. That is, the reason for reducing alcohol consumption is not only avoid hangover, but to improve mental stability and your cognitive performance during the following days. a study from the JSI Research and Training Institute in Boston, investigated the effects of alcohol consumption on work performance. According to their findings, even moderate levels of hangover can affect decision making, memory, and sustained attention. The problem is not only the occasional excess of alcohol, but residual effects that drag on for days and the discomfort that these effects produce among the youngest. Live without fatigue. Reducing alcohol consumption does not imply marathon days in which you can work more hours. What changes is consistency. Less alcohol means fewer “wasted” days, less cognitive fatigue and greater ability to maintain focus throughout the week. For a generation that moves in a more unstable labor market and competitive, that control of own performance is key, betting on social alternatives without alcoholmore planned consumption and less pressure to drink to fit in. In Xataka | On Tinder there is a trend that is gaining weight among Generation Z: dating without a single drop of alcohol Image | Unsplash (Vasilis Caravitis)

A movie scene traumatized an entire generation every time they bathed in the sea. And it was all due to a mistake

The story from ‘Jaws’ begins long before its monster appears on screen: it is born in a chaotic shoot, with a mechanical creature that did not work, a young director on the verge of dismissal and a climate of tension that threatened to sink not only the film, but also Steven Spielberg’s career. Hence the most chilling scene has arisen from the most logical thing: a failure. The technical failure and taking a bath. The story told a long time ago Spielberg himself. The entire team assumed that the film was doomed. Brucethe name given to the enormous robotic shark, constantly broke down as soon as it touched salt water, the days went by without being able to film anything usable and leaks from Hollywood ensured that the production was a disaster. However, from those limitations (and especially that useless shark) was born one of the most influential decisions in the history of cinema: not to show the threat, but to hint at it. Technical necessity forced Spielberg to shoot the film as a suspense thriller, closer to a Hitchcock film than a giant creature spectacle, and he turned the series of mechanical problems into the greater narrative success of his career. The result was a film where terror springs from the invisible, from calm water, from ominous sound. of two notes that advance like an unstoppable threat: a tension that would forever change the public’s relationship with the sea (for the worse). The sequence. The iconic opening scene (a quiet beach, a party and a girl who decides to bathe under the moon) is the perfect example of the way in which Spielberg transformed technical deficiencies into a cinematic virtue. We do not see the shark at any time, but we feel its presence from the first vibration of the water. Chrissie, played by Susan Backlinie, goes into the sea while the camera accompanies her slowly, without warning, until something grabs her from below, shakes her from side to side and ends up dragging her into the depths. On the surface calm returns, but the audience can no longer recover it: they know that the unknown is there, lurking where it cannot be seen. The psychological impact was so immediate that many viewers, first in the United States and then in Europe, left the cinema. with the same phrase in my head: “I will never get into the water again in my life.” Spielberg built an invisible attack in which the viewer’s imagination becomes the real monster, and he did it because he simply had no other choice: Bruce I would never have been able to shoot that shot convincingly. The absence of the animal, paradoxically, created a scariest presence than any mechanical creature. The failures that forged the tension. During filming, the mechanical shark turned out to be practically unusable. Engines corroded with salt, joints failed, and underwater operators spent hours trying to refloat a robot that was sinking rather than attacking. Spielberg confessed that the bug “looked silly” and that he was afraid that the public would laugh. But when something doesn’t work, cinema can reinvent itself. Forced to film without showing the predator, the director and his team chose to work as if the camera was the shark itself: water level shots, disturbing points of view, tense silences and, above all, the terrifying rhythm composed by John Williams, initially received as a joke and finally became one of the most recognizable leitmotifs in the history of cinema. Simple ball. The failed machinery forced the narrative to concentrate on “less is more,” and that visual reduction transformed what was going to be a monster film into a piece pure suspenseone in which the threat lurks beneath the surface like a collective trauma ready to emerge. Spielberg himself admitted after that, if the shark had worked well, ‘Jaws’ would have been a much worse movie or, at the very least, much less scary. From accident to cultural revolution. Thus, what began as a filming in crisis ended up triggering a unprecedented phenomenon. ‘Jaws’ not only terrified million viewers (literally altering his relationship with the beach), but also redefined the film industry. The film also inaugurated the concept “premiere-event”: massive campaigns, releases in hundreds of theaters and a summer strategy that demolished the old belief that no one went to the movies when the weather was good. The audience came again and again to scream, to feel the shock, to immerse themselves again in that first scene that turned a night bath into an act of pure recklessness. Spielberg’s film opened the door to a new economic model, inspired aggressive marketing strategies, generated an avalanche of imitators and consolidated the blockbuster as the central engine of Hollywood. By the way, I remembered in a wonderful Guardian report for the anniversary of the film, its cultural impact gave rise to infinite interpretations: readings on masculinity, power, institutional crisis, post-Watergate paranoia and even debates about its moral content. However, when Spielberg was asked what ‘Jaws’ really meant, the answer was so simple. like shiny: “It’s a movie about a shark.” And what makes it something bigger is that, because of a technical failurethat shark almost never shows up. Image | Universal Pictures In Xataka | In the 80s they were already cloning faces without the need for AI: ‘Back to the Future’ replaced an actor with a mask and we didn’t realize it In Xataka | Stephen King threw away the first pages of the book. His wife rescued them and turned a scene into horror film history

In Mexico, Generation Z has taken to the streets to demand changes. And he did it with ‘One Piece’

Mexico has joined the wave of protests youth events that over the last few months have shaken Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Peru, Morocco either Philippinesto cite a handful of examples. Marches that share two great hallmarks. The first, who promotes them: young people from Generation Z (born between the late 90s and the first decade of the 2000s) raised in the heat of the networks and now crying out for change. The second, its symbol. It does not matter whether the protests are organized in Lima, Kathmandu or Mexico City. Beyond using networks as catalysts, the mobilizations of Generation Z usually resort to the same emblem: the pirate flag from ‘One Piece’, the manga of Eiichiro Oda that the protesters have turned into their most identifiable banner. And not just because of the flag. In the marches it is also common to see other clear nods to the comic, such as the use of straw hats. How did you get to Mexico? After weeks of brewing online, the most visible mobilization in Mexico took place this weekend, when thousands of people gathered in the capital to make clear their “political fatigue”. The authorities speak of around 17,000 attendeesa human tide that left the monument The Angel of Independence and concluded in the Zócalo. The call was for the most part peaceful and passed without major incidents, beyond the insults to the president (Claudia Sheinbaum); but it was marred by the final altercations, which left more than a hundred of injured (mostly police officers) and several dozen arrested. In fact, the Ministry of the Interior assures that during the “violent acts” homemade explosive devices were used and objects were thrown at the agents. Who took to the streets? Some media they assure that among the protesters there were mainly young people, others qualify that during most of the Mexico City march, Generation Z was a minority and the most common thing was to meet people who were over 30 years old. Sheinbaum herself influenced that message later, commenting on what happened on Saturday in Mexico City: “They say that young people marched, but in reality there were very few, and they violently removed fences and broke windows. No to violence.” The truth is that, beyond Mexico City, there were mobilizations in other points of the country, such as Yucatán, Puebla, Monterrey or Guanajuato, and among the protesters they waved the banners of ‘One Piece’. Also posters demanding improvements in the country and Mexican flags with the face of Carlos Manzothe local leader of Uruapan shot to death just a few weeks ago. His death (a new example of the violence in the country) was in fact one of the levers of the protests. Click on the image to go to the tweet. And why did they go out into the streets? The other key. The TendenciaMax account (656,600 followers) echoed a few weeks ago a manifesto headed by “Generation Z Mexico” and the ‘One Piece’ flag (modified to add a mustache and Mexican hat), on which keys to the call were slipped. To begin with, it was insisted that the movement does not endorse any ideology or party and lacks “disguised agendas.” “We are young people who love our country and we are tired of the same history, the same abuse and corruption.” During the march people could be heard expressing their exhaustion with the violence, insecurity, Sheinbaum’s management or even denouncing that Manzo “the State killed him”. The word “narco-state” was also drawn on the wall built by the authorities to protect the Presidential Palace from protests. Excelsior slips that another point that has caused tension to grow is the decision to apply a 8% tax to video games with violent content. In the opinion of the Executive, the protest is orchestrated actually by the opposition and reply to an “articulated digital strategy” in networks by dint of bots. Why ‘One Piece’? If spontaneous mobilizations have something, it is that it is not easy to define them. Gen Z marches are no exception. Although in recent months they seem to have gained strengthspreading through Asia, Africa and Latin America, the truth is that they can go back even further in time, to student uprising of Bangladesh that led the prime minister to flee to India, or the 2022 revolt in Sri Lanka that forced the president to resign. What they have in common is the mobilization of Generation Z and the fortune that ‘One Piece’ seems to have made in their imagination, something that it doesn’t seem casual. The comic began to be published in the late 90s and continues to be updated, so its popularity has coincided with the Gen Z boom, and much of its plot fits in with the demands of the protests. After all, its main character, the young and charismatic pirate Monkey D. Luffyis presented as a figure of liberation. Images | David Cabrera (Flickr) and Wikipedia In Xataka | Young people have become more spiritual than the average in Spain. The problem for the Church is that no more Catholics

The offer has arrived for which I would consider buying an iPhone 16 instead of the new generation of Apple mobile phones

He iPhone 17 has arrived with quite a few improvements and new features, so it was difficult to get interested in a iPhone 16 which has remained at too stable a price for quite some time. But things have changed with the new offer that it has received at Powerplanet, whose price finally breaks the barrier of approximately 800 or more euros that we see in other stores, remaining in this case for 699 euros. Of course, it is worth clarifying that it is his international version. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links An iPhone that finally drops in price He iPhone 16 It is still a good mobile phone although the new generation has certain new features or improvements thanks to the fact that it is a powerful model thanks to its A18 chipwhich also makes it compatible with Apple Intelligence. In addition, it is also ideal for those looking for a more compact format (6.1 inches) than that of the iPhone 17 (6.3 inches). It also has other interesting specifications such as its compatibility with Apple MagSafe —something that not all iPhones offer, like the iPhone 16e-, his IP68 certification with resistance to water and dust or its Camera Control button. On the other hand, it is also a good mobile phone for taking photographs, since on the front we find a 12 MP camera while on the back it incorporates a camera module that is made up of a 48 MP main sensor and a 12 MP ultra wide angle. You may also be interested Spigen Liquid Air Case Compatible with iPhone 16 – Matte Black The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Spigen Glas.tR EZ Fit Screen Protector for iPhone 16, iPhone 15, 2 Units, Easy Installation, High Definition, 9H Hardness The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Pedro Aznar in Applesfera, Apple In Xataka | Best iPhones. Which one to buy and recommended models based on budget, tastes and quality-price In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes

There are green, orange and even purple USB ports. The color rule that indicates your generation is extinct

There was a time when everything was easier. If the USB port was white, it was slow; if it was black, it was standard; and if it was blue, it was the fastest. That rule that helped us Easily identify USB-A generations It’s gone. The arrival of new standards, charging functions and brand marketing has meant that today we find a wide range of green, orange and purple ports that no longer mean much. Image: StorageReview The original color code. The current chaos, as we explain in our guide to the USB standardit was not planned. The USB-IF organization tried to standardize it: white corresponds to USB 1.x, black for USB 2.0 (480 Mbps), and blue (or turquoise) for fast USB 3.0 (5 Gbps). First confusion. That is a product of the charging ports: the first problem came when colors began to be used to indicate power functions, not just data transmission. This is how the yellow, orange or red ports arrived. These usually indicate an “Always on” or “Sleep & Charge” function, which means that the port continues to provide power even when the computer is turned off or in sleep. More speed, more colors. To differentiate USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) and 3.2 (20 Gbps), the standard suggested the color turquoise blue, or failing that, red. Here the system began to leak. And the final blow came from marketing. A purple USB cable for a Huawei device indicates that it supports SuperCharge, its fast charging technology. Image: Reddit The rule became extinct completely when the brands decided use colors as corporate identity. The most famous case is that of Razer, which dyes its ports a characteristic lime green. Likewise, if you see a purple port, it’s probably from Huawei. The Chinese manufacturer uses them to identify its devices compatible with SuperCharge (its fast charging system), although technically it is still a USB 3.1 port. Chaos also in names. If there is already a mess with the colors, there is also a mess with the names: USB-IF itself has contributed by renaming the standards. USB 3.0 was renamed “USB 3.1 Gen 1” and is now “USB 3.2 Gen 1.” In parallel, USB 3.1 is now “USB 3.2 Gen 2”. This makes it almost impossible for a user to know what they are buying without looking at the fine print, a mess that the Wi-Fi Alliance solved much more elegantly. with standards such as Wi-Fi 5, 6 or the most recent Wi-Fi 7. The real culprit: USB-C. The final nail in the color coding coffin is the USB-C connector. It’s just a reversible connector, but what’s inside is chaos: the same USB-C port can be a slow USB 2.0, a USB 3.2 or a very fast Thunderbolt 4. The only way to differentiate them is to look for the lightning bolt logo that characterized Apple. Or read the device’s spec sheet because color, unfortunately, no longer means anything. Image | Xataka In Xataka | How to prepare a USB to use it on your mobile phone, tablet or Smart TV and expand its memory

the alpha generation is here

Have you seen someone on social media shouting “six-seveeeeen” with their hands in the air and an inexplicable smile? Don’t worry: you’re not losing your mind or getting into the weird side of TikTok (well, maybe a little). It is the new meme that is sweeping the Alpha Generation, and it is repeated so many times that it seems like a collective invocation. Nobody knows what it means, and that’s the funny thing. But here we want to know its origin. If we follow the trail it takes us to December 2024, when the rapper Skrilla released the song “Doot Doot (6 7)”. According to The Wall Street Journalthe “6-7” of the track refers to Philadelphia’s 67th Street, where many of his friends grew up. But within weeks, the internet hijacked the number and stripped it of any context. The next protagonist was Taylen Kinney, a 17-year-old point guard in the Overtime Elite league. In a video with teammatesKinney rated a Starbucks drink by saying, “Like a six… six… six-seven,” while moving his hands as if weighing two options. That simple reaction —explains The New York Times— was uploaded to TikTok, and within a month it was a cultural symbol. Kinney gained over a million followers, launched his brand “Mr. 67” and up to a “6-7” canned water line. 12 years old. But the definitive explosion came with a 12-year-old boy, Maverick Trevillian, nicknamed “the 6-7 boy.” At a basketball tournament organized by content creators, he shouted the phrase with such enthusiasm that became an instant meme. “Kids say ‘6-7’ every second of every day,” admitted to The Washington Posta medium that interviewed him along with his parents. From there, the cry jumped from phones to real life: teachers suffer from it, parents prohibit it, and even South Park dedicated an episode to the phenomenon. And what does it mean? If you’re trying to look for a hidden meaning, stop doing it: there isn’t one. “6-7 is a joke without a punchline, a joke without logic”, explains CNN. It is the typical occurrence that spreads precisely because it makes no sense. “Nobody knows what it means and that’s the funny thing,” said an American professor to the same medium. For some, it is a kind of generational secret language. As linguist Gail Fairhurst points outusing the meme is a form of belonging: if you know when to say it, you are within the group; If not, you’re out. The absurd works as an emotional password. Euronews defines it forcefully: “It means nothing. Absolutely nothing.” Although some children use it to qualify things (“Taylor Swift’s new album is a 6-7“), the consensus is that its value is in its emptiness. It is, as Skrilla himself would say: “An energy without explanation.” And, of course, the adults are baffled. “Teachers avoid saying six or seven in class, it’s like throwing catnip at cats,” a Texan teacher joked in The Wall Street Journal. Alpha memes: the evolution of absurdity. Each generation had its way of confusing adults. Millennials invented digital sarcasm; Generation Z embraced the nihilistic irony of “Skibidi Toilet“. But Generation Alpha has gone further: its humor is defined by total incomprehensibility. The linguist Salvatore Attardo, quoted by The Washington Postmaintains that “the mechanisms of humor have not changed since Greece; what has changed is the format.” What were once comic novels are now ten-second videos or two shouted numbers. From Euronews They point out that this nonsense as a reaction to contemporary chaos: in an overwhelming world, shouting “6-7” is a form of joyful rebellion. There is no cynicism, no political message: just the joy of not having to explain anything. And, in a way, that fits with today’s digital zeitgeist. Memes have become “cultural glue” for a decade: from “Let’s calm down” to “Chill Guy”, each one reflects the psychology of its time. If the “Chill Guy” embodied zen calm In the face of burnout, “6-7” represents total surrender to fun chaos. Although it’s not the first time. In reality, shouting out random numbers has an illustrious history. The Washington Post compares “6-7” to the enigmatic “23 Skiddoo!”an expression that swept the United States between 1905 and 1906. Nobody knew what it meant, but everyone repeated it. More than a century later, the “Ok, Boomer” marked another generational boundary: a subtle (or not so subtle) way of saying “you wouldn’t understand.” The difference is that “6-7” doesn’t mean anything about anything. No criticism, no irony, no message. It is a shared void, a community joke. Generation Alpha didn’t invent the trend of adopting a random number as a motto. It only perfected the idea that meaninglessness can unite us. Adults react (and kill the meme). As always, the adults arrived late. Guardian I already warned: “As soon as the media talks about it, the meme is dead.” Some American schools have banned saying “6-7” in class. Other teachers, resigned, use it to neutralize it: “The best way to kill a meme is for adults to say it,” said a linguist. And while analysts classify it as an example of “brain rot”we can do another different reading. It is a linguistic game, a form of belonging as innocent as saying “ola k ase” more than ten years ago. In the words of comedian Josh Pray: “I’m trying to get our numbers back before I turn 67 and they yell at me in the street.” A legacy of meaninglessness. Perhaps in a few months “6-7” will disappear, replaced by another number (“41” and “93” are already circulating, according to Know Your Meme). But his brief reign says a lot about how younger people communicate: in fleeting, self-referential codes that are completely impenetrable to older people. Perhaps therein lies its hidden message: that there is no message. That the Alpha Generation, raised among algorithms and crises, reserves the right to play with language without looking for meaning. And that, in a world where everything is analyzed, explained and monetized, can be a … Read more

A poster at the University of Granada uncovers one of the big problems of generation Z: “helicopter parents”

The Faculty of Educational Sciences of the University of Granada has become famous this week for a simple paper poster that has become viral on social networks. In the message, posted by the Vice Dean of Internships, you can read: “Parents are not attended to. All students enrolled in internships are of legal age.” Among thousands of other users, the poster was spread by the professor at the University of Granada Daniel Arias Aranda in your LinkedIn profile, stating: “When you have to put up this sign at the university, something is going wrong. Dear student: solve your own problems and don’t boss around mom and dad. Remember, the age of majority in Spain is 18.” Debate in networks: autonomy and maturity. The reactions on social networks have not been long in coming, with an intense exchange of opinions between students, families and teachers. There are those who strongly defend that the students “are too old to defend themselves,” as one student pointed out. interviewed by Antena 3and that “it makes no sense for parents to go to manage exams or tutorials.” Tap on the image to go to the original message On the other hand, the general secretary of the Association of Friends of Vicente Aleixandre responded to the message of the professor from his account on Another user went even further, thinking that “It should even be illegal, a person of legal age is no longer represented by his parents in legal dealings unless a judge determines otherwise; I consider that assisting parents goes against the autonomy of the student’s will.” helicopter parents. In the background of the conversation hovered – pardon the redundancy – the concept of “helicopter parents”, a term coined in 1969 by the writer Haim Ginott in his book “between parents and children“. The term describes the behavior of mothers and fathers who are so attentive to every issue of their children that they often intervene in processes that they, as adults, they should resolve on their own. Especially in university or work matters. However, a study revealed that this excess of control can lead to children with problems resolving conflicts and dealing with daily stress, something that would make them more anxious and dependent. Although the staff of the University of Granada I remembered in The Country They remember that, fortunately, these are “completely isolated cases”, the placement of the poster was motivated because some parents have come to make complaints, manage enrollment or request explanations directly from the university staff on behalf of his children. “In these cases, I explain to the mother that what needs to be promoted is the student’s critical reasoning, that he is the one who refutes a correction, not his parents,” he declared to The Country José Ángel Morales García, professor of Neurosciences at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM). A new parent profile. Beyond the helicopter parent phenomenonanother of the social keys that explain the rise of the debate is that current university students belong to generation Z, whose parents belong to generation X or millennials, born between the seventies and the nineties. This generation of parents was the first to go massively to university in Spain and is made up of professionals who have worked in multinationals, which gives them sufficient solvency to feel like legitimate interlocutors with teachers, academic staff and even before recruiters for a jobcoming to assume a more leading role than the student or candidate themselves. Compared to previous times, the fact that a greater proportion of parents have university experience has changed the relationship with the centers. Now they feel entitled to intervene or debate because they know the system from within. Even so, teachers insist that “the academic relationship is between the student and the university.” The research reveal that encouraging independence during youth improves their maturity and self-esteem. In Xataka | Silicon Valley’s “tech” generation Z has given up alcohol: its new fun is 92 hours of work Image | Pexels (Arina Krasnikova), Daniel Arias Aranda

more than 2,000 euros for each console generation and with nothing in property

Game Pass The price of your Tier More expensiveand not a pinch: an entire 50% that will apply to the Ultimate rate, a spectacular rise from 17.99 to 26.99 that is added to the one we already lived in July 2024, where 14.9 went to a still discreet 17.99 euros per month. A decision that puts on the table Not just an economic issuebut it forces the player to reflect on the nature of the service and what he obtains in exchange for the rate. Everything, nothing. It is an access system to games that We have completely naturalized to the point of turning it into a fee that governs the rest (PlayStation Plusfor example, it is “Sony’s game passs”). But it is amazing how we have become accustomed, over time, to His indisputable sticksvery visible, go unnoticed. That could change with this notorious price increase. The first thing is first. In spring this year It was already very clear that Microsoft’s main business was to make games to get in Game Pass. For a couple of seasons the company was already completely open to the idea that Xbox consoles are not necessary, but that it can be played with the platform titles on any screen with screen, thanks to the cloud. It was at that time where, in addition, we saw something unusual: Microsoft had become the main PlayStation editor, thanks to the success of games such as ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops 6’, ‘Minecraft’ E ‘Indiana Jones and the big circle’. There is no doubt: the least in Microsoft is their own consoles. We can play when, where and as we want. It is an idea that has a clear dark reverse: we have nothing in property, we are only renting a service. And the accounts are increasingly uphill: if each console generation lasts seven years, and we opt for the ultimate option of the service, we will have spent more than 2,200 euros to play. Strictly in playing, but not in a console and games that we can, for example, resell to cover future expenses. We are paying a money for nothing tangible in return, a drama that we already know well about the streamingbut somehow, he felt different when we had a very visible console next to the TV. Too cheap to be true. The funny thing is that the general sensation, As my partner Álex Alcolea saysis that Game Pass was “too cheap”: offer front -row games like ‘Silksong‘ either ‘Clair Oscur: Expedition 33‘(more everything that Microsoft studies develop) from day one was a bet that sounded very well for the player, but than made more than one analyst scratch the head: Was it economically sustainable in time? The purchase of activation by 68.7 billion dollars He only adds doubts to the subject: Game Pass smelled too much of a bargain. Taking ball. Microsoft has been trying to overcome its competitors for a while with an economic muscle’s blow: the purchase of Bethesda and Activision, the very affordable prices of Game Pass -rebosante for years of an indisputable attraction, between set in streaming and important releases on a day one- and survival without apparent problems to the Sales fall of Xbox Series. But all that seems to begin to change, and the price increase of Game Pass seems to sound at the beginning of the change: will we see up in the other rates? Will Microsoft definitely claudicate to have exclusive one in your service? Will there be more Xbox consoles? At the moment, we all have to undertake a considerable reflection on how much and why we are willing to spend. Header | Microsoft In Xataka | The portable Xbox is finally a reality. The only unimportant detail is that it is not exactly an xbox

The Z generation has coined a new term for those who want to leave at their time and does not seek promotions: professional minimalism

Generation Z is changing the way the work and professional success. While previous generations pursued promotions and long working days, for this generation there are new priorities that go beyond work. It is not a laziness or lack of ambition, but about a change of approach that prioritizes the quality of life and the balance between work and personal, all at a time marked by Economic uncertaintythe mass layoffs and AI. This change has been registered under the term “professional minimalism”, which reflects how many young people prefer to maintain their work with the right effort to guarantee Your financial securitybut without seeking promotions that imply greater responsibilities that, in addition, are not accompanied by a salary increase. Instead, they dedicate their energies in activities that are passionate about working hours. Do not call it lazy, call it professional minimalism. According to One of the meanings From the RAE dictionary, minimalism is the “aesthetic and intellectual trend that seeks the expression of the essential eliminating the superfluous.” This definition, applied to the workplace, would result in eliminating from the equation everything that does not provide benefits, such as overtime, taking work home or running the risk of ill. Professional minimalism seeks simplify daily work and limit responsibilities to the strictly necessary to comply with the provisions of your employment. In this way, younger workers do not exhaust their energies in long working days, but try to leave at their time and not give personal time to work. Seven out of ten young people does not want to be a boss. According to A survey June 2025 of Glassdoor to more than 1,000 users of its employment platform, 68 % of the workers of the Z generation said that it would not look for a managerial position if it were not for salary or position, a clear rejection of the traditional corporate ladder that previous generations ascended with enthusiasm. Chris Martin, research director of Glassdoor, this model believes that it represents “a conscious change that takes us away from the dependence of a single employer, establishes clear limits and generates multiple sources of income for financial stability.” For generation Z, this modality does not mean being lazy or working less, but positioning against the pressure of the “Hustle culture“ Multi -employment without responsibilities. Although they reject certain aspects of the work that previous generations had embraced, generation Z is still ambitious, but it is in its own way. In fact, according to Another survey carried out by Harris poll among Glassdoor users, 57 % of these young people have at least a second job, compared to 48 % of millennials who confess to being multi -employed, 31 % of generation X and 21 % of Baby Boomers. This shows that generation Z prefers to guarantee its financial stability with several jobs without responsibilities, instead of giving everything in a single job that, the least thought day, can lose. As Martin said, “it is not that generation Z rejects work. It rejects an obsolete version of the work that has been sold to them.” The real job is not to get carried away. After a progressive degradation of the relationship of trust between employee and company, which has ended with workers with years of dedication to its fired companies, the Z generation has begun to apply the same rules of loyalty to companies. Instead of prioritizing work above their working life, young people have begun to put limits to the time and effort they dedicate to employment, preventing fatigue and Labor burnout ruin the time they dedicate to their personal life. Such and as stood out Fast Companyone of the young participants in the survey, I commented that “If people really passionate about their work, they would not win anything. Passion is for work from 5 to 9, the one that comes after 9 to 5”. In Xataka | Generation Z does not endure more than a year in its jobs: it is not for unfair or salaries, it is to be better professionals Image | Unsplah (Mushvig Niftaliyev)

A new generation of robots promises precision and efficiency. It also opens the door to cyberspage risks

The movement of the robotic arm seems impeccable: each turn, each clamp, each displacement occurs with the accuracy of a metronome. However, while these actions convey confidence in a hospital or a factory, another story is drawn in the background. The commands, although encrypted, let rhythms and pauses In the traffic that travels through the network. These patterns, invisible to the naked eye, in many cases allow to deduce the task executed. The same accuracy that we applaud in the robot can become a trace for external observers. Over the last years the interest in collaborative robots has shot himself. Hospitals are used as surgical assistants for their ability to make fine movements without fatigue, and in factories they have become allies for repetitive or risk tasks. Not only do productivity improve, they also reduce accidents by replacing the operator in hostile environments. The connectivity that drives its expansion, however, is also the one that can expose them to new vulnerability scenarios, According to a study in the University of Waterlooin Canada. Precision that dazzles in hospitals, a trail that can be interpreted The investigation did not focus on real -time robots by means Preprogrammed scripts. These systems receive an orders sequence and execute them with minimal human intervention, which reduces direct supervision and expands automation possibilities. At the same time, the way in which these systems structure high -level commands generates regular traffic patterns, and that regularity opens opportunities for analysis. The work was designed with a very concrete scenario: a passive attacker, someone who only observes the network traffic between the robot and its controller without deciphering it. The experiment was carried out with an arm Kinova Gen3a light robot usually used in research environments. The controller executed preprogrammed commands and the communications were protected with TLS encryption. With this assembly, the researchers registered 200 network traces corresponding to four different actions, looking for a varied and representative set. The authors began by converting network catches into temporary signals: instead of looking at the content of the packages, they analyzed when each one was sent and with what separation. Those time series were treated as acoustic signs, which allowed to apply classic signal processing techniques, such as correlation and convolution, which seek similarities and patterns in pulses and rhythms. From this transformation they trained a classifier that, in the closed environment of the test, assigned an action to each trace. The experiment used 200 traces on four actions and showed that, even with activated TLS, temporary subpatrones were detectable. Kinova Gen3 The trials showed that the method worked with remarkable efficiency: in most tests the system was able to identify the robot action with a success level close to 97%. This means that, although the orders travel encrypted by TLS, the observation of the intervals and the cadence can allow to rebuild what task it is executed. In a hospital, that could give clues about the nature of an intervention; In a factory, on the production sequence. A complete deduction is not always achieved, but the finding shows that the encryption alone is not enough. Although orders travel encrypted by TLS, the observation of the intervals and cadence can allow to rebuild what task it is executed. The finding acquires relevance to extrapolating it to real environments. In health, an attacker could identify details of a surgical intervention without the need to access the medical history, only observing the robot communication flows. In the industry, the patterns themselves could reveal assembly steps or Characteristics of a patented process. It is not an isolated failure of a specific model, but an alert signal on how connectivity multiplies the exposure. Each connected robot becomes a possible observation point. The researchers did not limit themselves to pointing out the problem: they also explored possible defenses. One of them is to modify the timing of the robot programming interface, so that the commands do not follow such a regular and predictable pattern. Another is to apply package filling and timing manipulation to hide the real rhythms. These measures could reduce the inference capacity of an attacker, although with a cost: lower network efficiency and, in some cases, more latency in the execution of the robot. Technological innovation always advances in parallel to the need to protect it. Cobots exemplify that balance: they promise efficiency and new forms of work, but also force rethink defense measures. It is not about stopping its adoption, but about doing it with a conscious look of the risks. Security and development are not opposite paths; They must travel together if you want the future of robotics to be sustainable and reliable. Images | Kinova Robotics (1, 2) | Freepik In Xataka | Alibaba is becoming the Ai Open Source sponator. Your family of Qwen models is putting the market above

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.