14,000 Spaniards live in Dubai. Not everyone is fleeing from the Treasury, but everyone is equally terrified of the missiles

The Iranian attacks against the Arab Emirates in retaliation for the US and Israeli offensive have trapped thousands of Spaniards in Dubai, including content creators and celebrities who denounced their situation on the networks. And under the missile fire, a paradox: the city that promised security and zero taxes has been suffering for two days from an attack that could have devastating economic consequences. Spaniards in Dubai. After the attack by the United States and Israel on Iran On February 28, the response consisted of a wave of retaliation with 137 missiles and 209 drones directed against the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and other positions with a US military presence in the Gulf. The region’s airspace closed and tens of thousands of people were left without flights. Among them, Spaniards like Ofelia Hentschel, a MasterChef 9 contestant and content creator who released videos that, due to their content, quickly went viral. in them explained that, while on vacation in Dubai, he had begun to hear “bombs and tremors in the hotel” while sunbathing by the pool, and that air traffic was paralyzed. What made his case spread in an extraordinary way was that he claimed that the Spanish embassy “does not speak, does not answer”, while Italian and French citizens were receiving a response from their diplomatic representations. Frustration led her to the phrase “Stop paying taxes, because as you see they are of no use.” Ah, the irony. Hentschel is located in one of the favorite destinations of those have moved their tax residence outside of Spain precisely so as not to contribute to the taxes whose effect she now needed. This was not necessarily the case (Hentschel was awayis not a resident of the Emirates) but the phrase once again triggered a debate that already existed: that of the limits of reciprocity between the citizen who pays more taxes for having more income and the State. Less than 24 hours laternow calmer, Hentschel commented that she had been contacted by the embassy and that she felt “super supported by Spain.” More Spanish. Hentschel’s case was the most covered in the media, but not the only one. The Cordoba paddler Javi Garrido was in Dubai with his girlfriend and his coach, finalizing the preparation for the Gijón paddle tennis tournament. Garrido opted for a different tone than Hentschel, with a message of calm to his followers, where he spoke of the desire to return “as soon as possible.” His profile (elite athlete in the middle of preseason) points to another segment of the large group of Spaniards who at that time were in the Emirates for reasons that have nothing to do with tax evasion. It is also the case of Hugo KyotoSpanish who makes videos about investment and personal economy. Kyoto is closer to the profile that has been criticized: resident in Dubai, with content about money and investments and that the media noise identifies with those who settle there in search of tax advantages. Spanish expats. The Spanish community in the United Arab Emirates has grown steadily over the last decade. According to data from the Spanish Embassy in Abu Dhabi The Consular Registration Registry had 8,500 registered in 2024, although ambassador Íñigo de Palacio’s own estimates suggest that the real number could be closer to 14,000, given that around 38% of residents are not registered. Between 2022 and 2023, 404 new Spanish residents were registered, and between 2023 and 2024 that figure almost doubleduntil reaching 722. Among them, executives displaced by multinationals, engineers in infrastructure projects, airline and hospitality staff, and also a segment of content creators and digital entrepreneurs, undoubtedly the most in the media (and criticized). The real profile of the Spanish expat in Dubai is mostly work-related. In addition to that, the tax reality is more complex than simply transferring residence to the Emirates, which does not guarantee the end of tax obligations in Spain. The Double Taxation Agreement between both countries, signed in Abu Dhabi in 2006, establishes that only Emirati nationals can benefit from the status of tax residents in the UAE, and the tax authorities of the Emirates themselves They do not issue tax residence certificates for stays of less than twelve months. Influencers in danger. The attack has not exclusively affected Spaniards, and content creators from different nationalities They have reacted with a mixture of disbelief and terror to the attacks. The city that has been sold on numerous occasions as a synonym for safe luxury has shown this weekend in its skies the luminous trail of intercepted missiles. Dubai’s illusion of invulnerability has fractured in a few hours. Beyond the war. All this leads us to the fact that the logic of Iranian retaliation transcends the military. Tehran was targeting not only US military installations, but also the economic architecture of the region: the financial and logistical hubs of the Gulf that for three decades have functioned as a lever for the order that the US and Israel want to preserve. The attack on the Jebel Ali port, the Dubai international airport or the financial districts of Abu Dhabi are more than planned. They are not collateral damage. That’s why, with 88% of its GDP generated by expats, tourism, finance, aviation and maritime transport, a deterioration in the perception of security can produce a flight of these economic assets in the form of influencers and visitors. Dubai and Abu Dhabi had converted their security and stability on the basis of its attractiveness, and the Iranian missiles brought out such accurate tweets like that of investor TK Robinson in X: “I moved to Qatar to escape taxes; now I’m fleeing missiles.” Header | Darcey Beau in Unsplash

More and more car brands are fleeing from Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. And it makes all the sense in the world

My Volkswagen Polo is 10 years old, has a screen where I can see car statistics and play the radio or Spotify and little else: if I want to enjoy a GPS navigator, I have to place my phone on a support on the grille and it will work. So yes, I get really excited when I drive my partner’s Kona, with a screen bigger than a tablet on which I can visit Xataka from the web browser, watch videos either play a game. Android Auto is wonderful, but if I connect my iPhone, using apps like Waze on CarPlay is also another story. For someone who has a stupid screen in their car and the intention of not renewing it in the next five years, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay sound like a heavenly melody in my ears. However, Google and Apple’s infotainment systems are taking a step back: there are manufacturers who decide to back off, so their new models are left out. And it doesn’t surprise me. Goodbye to Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Last summer and despite the delays, Apple promised they would be happy with their Apple CarPlay Ultra budding until he got a brand slam: There are barely Aston Martin and Porsche left. Land Rover, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Ford, Lincoln, Audi, Jaguar, Acura, Volvo, Honda, Renault, Infinity and Polestar got off the boat. In the fall, the leadership of General Motors explained in a The Verge podcast that it intended to remove both infotainment systems from its newer vehicles and replace them with its own Gemini-spiked system. Finally, German brands such as BMW, Mercedes-Benz, or Volkswagen they have joined to create an open source alternative called Safety Open Vehicle Core. S-Core, its abbreviation, is basically a base infrastructure with the essentials from which each manufacturer will build its adapted customization layer. It’s a matter of control. Android Auto and Apple CarPlay provide a unified and mainstream experience within the reach of the majority who have a smartphone and implementing them is not expensive. Although well, it is not so much because of the money they spend installing Android Auto and Apple CarPlay and more because of what they stop earning. Data collection and what you can do with it. It should be noted that with their respective infotainment systems, Apple collects information such as your position and how it varies over time, which allows you to know your speed, schedules, frequent routes… to give some simple examples. They also know what apps you use and when. An open door to the vein of subscriptions. In recent years we have already seen how large manufacturers launched a subscription model to release certain premium hardware functions: Volkswagen to unlock all the powerthe controversial BMW heated seats (then backed out), Mercedes and its improvements subscription accelerationor Polestar for offering similar performance packages. Having access to detailed information on usage habits would allow the establishment of a user profile and thus offer a more personalized experience in the form of a subscription. Materializing it will not be easy or fast. The GM news detailed that the measure would be implemented in the coming years and does not even imply a complete disengagement as long as it does not completely eliminate Google from the equation, since it implements Gemini, the Menlo Park company’s big bet. And Google’s AI is not exactly sparing in capturing information. Using an Android fork could also be an interesting option. S-Core- Eclipse Release Schedule The route of German companies does seem more viable. In fact, their preview schedule is available on HitHub and for now they are fulfilling it to the letter. Of course, one thing is that they are able to create a platform and another is the experience it offers. How cold it is outside of Android Auto and CarPlay. One of the great assets of Android Auto is the quantity and quality of compatible apps: Thinking about a platform without Google Maps, Waze or Spotify would feel like a huge step backwards. So later, they will have to get the companies behind them to bring their apps to these systems. And even if they did achieve it, then there are other hot potatoes such as updates to their frequency. Life without Android Auto or Apple CarPlay is an option and if you don’t tell Rivian or Tesla, but in the end it’s all about user experience. Don’t let it feel like taking a step back. Buying a car (especially if it is high-end) and finding a setback is not a dish of good taste. They don’t charge you a premium for unlocking functions or removing advertising either. The scenario of having to pay a monthly fee to access maps and extras when you have a solid and free alternative on the market sounds absurd. In any case, the winds of change are blowing on car screens. In Xataka | Android Auto is quietly preparing for us to drive with smart glasses. In Spain it won’t be easy In Xataka | This car was a pioneer with Android Automotive, but its users were crying out for Android Auto. Your wish has been granted

Big tech companies are fleeing China like the plague. Their future depends on it

The growing tension between China and the United States is causing a stampede among big technology companies. Apple already made a move at the beginning of the year and now Microsoft and Amazon follow. They are not the first companies that They move from China to manufacture in other Asian countriesbut this migration is different as they are trying to eliminate China from the entire supply chain down to the smallest component level. What is happening. They count in Nikkei Asia that Microsoft wants to manufacture most of its products outside of China and has set a limit of 2026. This movement would affect the production of Microsoft Surfaces and especially data centers, since it is a much more sensitive product. In fact, they have already managed to move a large part of the production of server components because it is a more sensitive product, but their goal is for at least 80% of the components to come from outside China. They also want to move some Xbox production out of China, although in this case they are not being as strict. Why is it important. This move by Microsoft consolidates the trend of big technology companies moving towards independent supply chains from China. It is not a question of patriotism, it is an attempt to ensure their survival and minimize risks derived from the increasingly tense trade warsuch as interruptions in supply and price increases. Besides, in the middle of the AI ​​raceindependence becomes even more necessary. Something has changed. As we said, this is not the first time that technology companies have tried to become independent from China. The improvement in working conditions has made it not so cheap to produce there (although have found ways to retain manufacturing), so its status as the “factory of the world” has been lost in favor of other Southeast Asian countries. However, this time it is a broad movement that covers everything from assembly to materials and components such as PCBs, connectors, cables and fibers. The challenge. Moving the assembly is the easy part, but moving the entire production to the last component is a huge challenge. The date that Microsoft has set does not seem very realistic, especially considering that we are talking about a large production volume. According to Omdiadistribute about 4 million Surfaces per year. amazon. AWS is also moving towards ‘non-Chinese’ production for its AI data centers. They were considering reducing the presence of SYE, their printed circuit board supplier, but realized that it was not so easy to replace them. They are companies with which they have a relationship for decades and offer good prices, as well as quality and great production capacity. Google. Those in Mountain View are also embarking on a similar path. According to Nikkei, they are asking their suppliers to expand server production in Thailand. At the end of 2024 we learned that They planned to invest 1 billion dollars and it seems to have paid off because they have managed to double their production capacity with four new facilities. Image | Flickredited In Xataka | The problem is not that Europe has “expropriated” Nexperia from a Chinese company: it is that it approved its sale just a year ago

central banks are fleeing the dollar

A few days ago we saw how gold had exceeded $4,000 per ounce for the first time in its history and, as it could not be otherwise, it has raised a general alarm in the markets. And there are not exactly a few analysts who are already pointing to $5,000 by 2026. But the real story behind this historic rally is not only that gold is expensive: is that the dollar is losing its neutrality as a world reserve currency. In emerging countries and China is where this is being noticed the most, and central banks react accordingly. A historic rise. gold accumulates a 50% increase so far in 2025, its best year since 1979. However, neither geopolitical uncertainty nor rate cuts nor dollar weakness fully explain the magnitude of the movement. Just like they explain Since Expansion, gold has continued to rise even with the truce in Gazasome recovery of the dollar and a Federal Reserve in standby mode. Something deeper is happening. Central banks lead the purchase. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, central banks They have bought gold massively and constant. In this way, some emerging countries and China diversify their reserves to depend less on the US dollar. According to Goldman Sachscentral banks explain 19% of the expected rise in gold until the end of 2026, buying an average of 80 tons in 2025 and 70 in 2026. Bank of America also matches by pointing to central banks and small investors who push the price up. Gold already competes with American Treasury bonds. The value of central banks’ gold reserves (excluding the United States) reached 3.93 trillion dollars at current prices, slightly exceeding the $3.92 trillion in US Treasury bonds held by foreign governments. Gold has gone from representing 10% of world reserves a decade ago to 24% by mid-2025. It is a structural change in the international monetary system. Preparing for a post-hegemonic dollar world. What is at stake is the global financial architecture. Central banks in emerging economies are betting on a future where the dollar is no longer the neutral currency it has been for decades. Trade tensions between the United States and China, political pressures on the independence of the Federal Reserve and record debt levels Americans feed this narrative. Individual investors join in. A wave of retail investors has recently added to institutional demand. In Japan, where gold exceeded 20,000 yen per gramdistributors such as Tanaka Precious Metals had to suspend sales due to the avalanche of orders. In Hong Kong and Türkiye, traditional gold-buying markets, families They are both buying and selling to take advantage of record prices. Gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) they caught 26 billion dollars in the third quarter of 2025 alone, a record figure. Around $5,000. Société Générale has just raised its forecast to $5,000 per ounce by the end of 2026, describing this goal as “increasingly inevitable.” Bank of America aims for the same level, while Goldman Sachs projects 4,900 dollars by December 2026. And in all the projections there is a common denominator: they assume that institutional demand from central banks will remain strong and that individual investors will continue to see gold as a refuge, especially in an environment of great uncertainty. Risk. It’s not all good news for the precious metal. a survey from Bank of America shows that 25% of fund managers consider long positions in gold as one of the most saturated bets in the market. Just like they explain From the Financial Times, historically, when gold moves more than 20% away from its 200-day moving average, as is happening now, corrections of 20% to 33% usually occur. But even with that risk, everything indicates that the world is preparing for a monetary system where the US dollar no longer dominates alone. Cover image | Jingming Pan In Xataka | In Europe we have a problem: we are becoming the Japan of the 21st century

Fleeing from China means raising prices

The United States has granted a small truce to the incessant tariff war temporarily paralyzing the levies for electronic devices. Scarce hours after communicating that The global tariff would be set at 10%completely putting the focus on 125% imposed on China, Trump throws an oxygen ball for large technological ones. Whatever happens with tariffs, there is an inevitable consequence: the global supply chain has been broken as we know it, and companies must start moving quickly with the consequences that this entails. Apple as best example. Among all the technology is one that stands out as the greatest beneficiary and, at the same time, such as the one that has to lose the most if it does not act agility. Apple depends deeply on its supply chain in China. The Asian country assembles almost all of its products, a situation that will criticize the entry into force of A 125% tariff to China. In the last five years, Apple has tried diversify its production chain With factories in countries like India or Vietnambut the bulk of its production, accumulated knowledge and economies of scale are still anchored in China. Getting out of China is not so easy. Apple is not the only giant that manufactures in China. Samsung continues to manufacture there, although to a very small extent and focused on smaller devices and components. Giants such as Microsoft, HP or Dell (USA), which have been moving production to Mexico and Thailand for years, have Much of the production chain In China. Its hyperspecialized industrial infrastructure, perfected for more than four decades hand in hand with large technological ones, is impossible to replicate in the short term. Big Tech have been externalizing their own talent for years: they have invested millions in installing equipment, training engineers and moving their knowledge to the Asian country. Vietnam, India, Thailand. Manufacturers need two pillars to cement their production chain: economic labor and specialized labor. Countries like Vietnam, thanks in great part to collaboration with giants such as Samsung, have been offering an alternative to Chinese manufacturing for more than two decades. Manufacturers like Samsung They have been moving much of their production to Vietnam for years to reduce their dependence on China. Except for Apple, which is still behind in this great escape, most of the sector has followed that path. But not even that diversification guarantees total immunity: the threat of new tariffs, such as those of 46% that Trump has already imposed just a week ago to Vietnamese products, could return the commercial tension to the foreground. An inevitable turn. There is no possible scenario that prevents deep changes in the global supply chain. Manufacturers have been avoiding production on local soil for the very high costs that this would entail, and betting on hyperspecialized countries in which they have invested millions, talent, and i+d. The tariff threat will change the turns, whatever happens. The 90 -day extension in the exemptions will allow to avoid a sudden rise in prices, but will not prevent large manufacturers from beginning to rethink deep changes in their manufacturing strategy. Move file and move it fast. The inevitable consequence is diversification, one that has been making progressively and slowly and must accelerate if companies want to continue respecting their profit margins. This diversification will go hand in hand, practically inevitably, of price increases. Fleeing China completely has a cost, and thinking that manufacturers will assume the impact without moving it to final consumers is little more than utopian. Image | ASML In Xataka | Spain acts where Europe doubts: the strategy that is paying fruits in China

Apple and Samsung have been fleeing from China for years to save costs. Tariffs just torpedo their strategy

The Trump administration has announced New tariffs. Some that expand the Commercial War to even more countries and that, inevitably, will have severe consequences in the production and distribution chain of large technological ones. Some of them, such as Apple or Samsung, had been trying to reduce their dependence on Chinese manufacturing, moving part of production to countries like Vietnam. A new tariff of almost 50% for countries like Vietnam has just launched its strategy through the air. The new tariffs. Donald Trump has announced a new set of tariffs for all those products that are imported to the United States. The most affected is the main commercial enemy of the country At the moment: China. Adding previous movements, tariffs to the Asian country amount to 54%. Attending to the rest of the victims on the list, there is a country that is specially injured: Vietnam. The United States has imposed a 46% tariff on one of the barracks of the two technological giants, Apple and Samsung. China’s escape. The production of Apple and Samsung products has been linked to China for years. To reduce this unit, both companies have been trying to diversify the supply chain Moving manufacturing to countries like India or Vietnam. This last country has become one of the most attractive destinations for large technological ones, mainly due to their economic but highly qualified workforce. Its port proximity with China also makes it a strategic point, minimizing friction when importing electronic components. Key products. Apple has been manufacturing the AirPods for years of Vietnam, and the assembly of some key products, such as iPad, has been starting its steps in the country for a few years. Some of its strategic business partners, such as Foxconn, They have been investing for years millions of dollars in the Asian country. More relevant if possible is the case of Samsung, who produces much of its phones in Vietnam. The Korean company has been betting on this country for almost 20 years, having consolidated as one of the main producers of electronic components and devices in the country. Leaving Vietnam, pointing out that India was another strategic points in the supply chain of both manufacturers. One in seven iPhone is already manufactured in Indiaand Samsung carries Since 2018 giving life to Galaxy devices in this country. No one was prepared. Apple and Samsung had been moving production out of China for years not only to minimize costs, but to avoid the consequences of the commercial war between the United States and China. Diversifying the supply chain was key to avoid depending on a single region, as well as to bring production closer to emerging markets with great growth margin. Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, India … Each and every one of the alternative destinations to China will suffer a very high tariff load. After years of strategy focused on running from China, the new tariffs make the foundations they had been building for years staggered. And the question is clear. What consequences will they have? Who will pay the duck. Although it seems unlikely that both companies kindly invite consumers to accept an increase in the cost of between 26 and 46%, which seems inevitable is that the products of both manufacturers rise in price not only in the United States, but globally. The tariff storm will force a complete readjustment of the current margins of the main Big Tech, since they will have a significant impact on the global supply chain. Voices of the sector, like Mark Gurman, point out what is “essentially impossible” That there is no price increase in the United States, and members of the Federal Regulations Code (CFR), they point out that these rates will mean an increase in about $ 150 per device. Image | Xataka In Xataka | In full tariff war, the EU has found a weapon to press the United States: soybeans

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.