take it with 512 GB and 350 euros discount

Although Black Friday and Cyber ​​Monday have passed, you can still find good deals on Apple devices. Such is the case of this MacBook Air M4in its version of 512GBwhich now, at PcComponentes, has reached its historical minimum price: 1,099 euros. Although when you add it to the cart, you can get it with a 10 euro discount, for 1,089 eurosthus reaching its historical minimum price. Apple MacBook Air M4 512GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A cheap Apple laptop with excellent performance If you are looking for an Apple laptop with a good quality-price ratio, this MacBook Air M4 It is a good purchasing option and even more so thanks to this offer. It is perfect for working and studying anywhere, as it is very light in weight. only 1.24kg. This is the model with screen 13.6-inch Liquid Retinawith a resolution of 2,560 x 1,664 pixels. Reaches a brightness of 500 nits and it supports 1 billion colors and comes with True Tone technology. Your brain is Apple M4 chipwhich is accompanied by 16 GB RAM and a 512 GB storage. Its battery lasts up to 18 hours and its keyboard stands out for coming with Touch ID. As far as connectivity is concerned, it comes with a MagSafe port, two Thunderbolt 4 ports, a 3.5 mm jack and WiFi 6E, as well as USB ports. Some accessories that may interest you for this MacBook Air BENFEI 7 in 1 USB C HUB with HDMI (4K@60Hz), 2*USB-A, 1*USB-C Data, 100W Charging, SD/TF Card Reader, Anti-tangle Silicone Cable The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Babacom Laptop Stand Table The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Javier Penalva (Xataka) and Apple In Xataka | MacBook Air M4 vs MackBook Air M3: these are the main differences between the two models In Xataka | MacBook Air Vs MacBook Pro: we explain which one to choose

Europe has been warning for years that firing in Spain is a bargain. Now Congress is making a move with the “restorative dismissal”

Unfair dismissal in Spain is a bargain for companies. At least that is what the European Committee of Social Rights (CEDS), dependent on the Council of Europe, has been telling Spain for years. Throughout this time, the Government has turned a deaf ear to the recommendations from Brussels. However, an unexpected turn caused by the mistake of a representative of the Popular Party During a vote in Congress, a Non-Law Proposal (PNL) by Sumar was allowed to prosper, which urges the Government to present a bill to reform the laws that prevent the application of the restorative dismissal that Europe has actively and passively requested. Europe has been warning since 2021. When Spain ratified in 2021 the European Social Charterassumed the commitment to harmonize its labor legislation with its principles. Since then, the European Committee of Social Rights (CEDS), an advisory body of the Council of Europe, has reiterated that the Spanish system, based on a fixed calculation of 33 days per year worked and a maximum of 24 months, does not meet the criteria of said commitment. The problem is that the European Social Charter is a set of guidelines, but it is not binding, and the CEDS is a consultative body, so it cannot demand legislative modifications from Spain. Its resolutions are recommendations, valuable from a legal and political point of view, but without executive force. This lack of obligation has allowed Spain to postpone reforms that would change the way compensation is calculated for employees for unfair dismissal. The cornerstone: article 24. The point of greatest friction to undertake the reforms is found in article 24 of the European Social Charter. It requires “the right of workers dismissed without valid reason (unfair dismissal) to adequate compensation or other appropriate relief.” This means ensuring that compensations to employees for unfair dismissal must be “appropriate and dissuasive”. Something that, as a general rule, does not occur in the system of fixed compensation that is currently applied in all judicial processes for unfair dismissal. This time the request has not come from Europe. Despite having dictated different resolutions and requestsnothing has changed in Europe’s position, nor has it gained power to force Spain to implement the legislative changes. However, what has changed is internal politics. In September, a Non-Law Proposition promoted by Sumar managed to get ahead thanks to the voting error of a PP deputy, repeating the scene that in 2022 allowed approve the labor reform. This NLP does not modify the law itself, but it does urge the Government to begin the legislative process to adapt the regulations to the European framework. This implies the opening of a social dialogue table with unions and employers and, subsequently, the preparation of a bill that must return to Congress to be voted on. The reform of the regulations to legislate unfair dismissals, therefore, is still a long way off, but for the first time the Executive is obliged to put it on the table. “Restorative dismissal” is not a type of dismissal. Among all the CEDS recommendations, none has generated as much debate as the so-called restorative dismissal. The name can lead to confusion: it is not a new category of dismissal as the disciplinarynull or inadmissible, but refers to a proposal to transform How compensation is calculated when a dismissal is declared unfair. Europe considers that the current Spanish system is too predictable and, in many cases, insufficient. The result is that companies can treat unfair dismissal as a more or less easy cost to assume and choose which employees or how many to dismiss based on the cost of the operation. Restorative dismissal causes this calculation to vary from one employee to another and is under the sole discretion of a judge, which would prevent companies from calculating in advance the final cost of the dismissal. What is restorative dismissal?. As its name indicates, restorative dismissal is a model that seeks to individualize the severance payment to the specific damage it causes to the dismissed employee, instead of an automatic calculation based in days per year worked. Judges could assess specific factors in each case, taking into account factors such as the age and social situation of the worker, the real probability of re-entering the labor market, the economic and personal impact of the dismissal, or the size, solvency, or economic capacity of the dismissing company. Based on these factors, for example, a 60-year-old worker with children and a 24-year-old single worker who were fired by the same company in similar positions would obtain different compensation because, statistically, the older one would have less likely to return to the labor market than the young person. Europe understands that this flexibility is essential to repair the real damage of dismissal and to act as a preventive mechanism. Deterrence, protection and less business calculation. The objective of restorative dismissal is not only to better compensate the worker based on the impact caused, but also to discourage the appeal of unfair dismissal and that, if companies really have economic problems that justify dismissals, they do so through dismissals for objective reasons. If the cost is no longer predictable, the company loses the ability to make profitability calculations. This protection measure especially affects precarious groups who, due to their low salary or short seniority, are very cheap to fire: young people, women and precarious workers. Furthermore, Europe insists that the reinstatement after dismissal inadmissible should no longer be optional for the company as it is currently, and should become a real possibility imposed by the court when it is appropriate. Restoration, in this sense, is not only economic, but also labor-related. Justice has its hands tied. Despite Europe’s insistence, the Spanish courts have rejected impose compensation higher than the current scale included in the article 56 of the Workers’ Statute. The reason was not a lack of judicial will, but the absence of a legal framework that would allow additional compensation to be established without generating legal uncertainty. In Xataka | … Read more

Your heart has a natural “handbrake” against aging and it is important to consume enough

When we think about diseases related to the heart or with our circulatory system The need to reduce the fat consumption either salt. But there is an actor that we have somewhat forgotten aside and that can significantly influence how our arteries age: magnesium. What is known. Magnesium seems to be intended for athletes so that they put it in their hands and do not slip on the training bars or to avoid cramps or improve sleep. But science is seeing that this mineral is really important for keeping our arteries functioning in a controlled manner. And its function is so critical that experts see it essential to prevent the blood from becoming ‘too active’ and to thus protect the heart from premature wear. The influencers. And the truth is that seeing all the properties it has, there are many influencers that we can see promoting the use of this supplement through social networks. Above all, taking advantage of sales channels like the TikTok Shop to try to sneak it in to anyone who wants to have all these properties, but logically going through their checkout. That is why although it has great features, especially in the coagulation of our bloodwe must understand exactly why its effect is like this and also whether or not it is necessary to supplement. Since with our wonderful Mediterranean diet Few people will see it as totally necessary. The importance of blood. It is known that blood should neither be too liquid nor too ‘thick’ for it to move correctly. Calcium is one of those responsible for keeping the blood in an optimal state, favoring coagulation when it is too liquid (something that could increase the probability of bleeding). But on the other side we must have a brake that does exactly the opposite, to prevent the blood from being too coagulated, which can cause problems such as thrombi. This is precisely magnesium. And the key is in the balance of both substances so that the blood is in optimal conditions to do its job. It is something documented. A review that was published in 2024 Cureu detailed this mechanism quite precisely: without enough magnesium, calcium dominated cellular function. The only thing this caused was that the platelets did not stop sticking together, making the risk of thrombosis increase enormously. In this way, it was seen that magnesium was a natural antithrombotic that kept the blood with adequate fluidity. Living longer with good health. Taking care of the blood vessels is essential to be able to have correct aging, avoiding problems such as the formation of thrombi or rupture of the endothelium of the vessels. Because the endothelium is nothing more than the part of the arteries that is in contact with the blood and its degeneration only causes the formation of atheroma plaques or the lack of regulation of blood pressure. That is why in a randomized controlled trial published in the magazine Circulation shed light on this: magnesium therapy in patients at coronary risk significantly improved endothelial function. The researchers observed that the higher the levels of intracellular magnesium, the better the ability of the arteries to dilate and adapt to blood flow. The secret of a good diet. But with this the question is mandatory: should magnesium supplementation be uncontrolled? The answer is no. Currently we live in a world where food supplements and bioelements such as tryptophan, magnesium, or calcium are the order of the day. But the reality is that you only have to supplement if there is a deficiency demonstrated by an analysis and that it has a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the normal case, a balanced diet gives us all the necessary elements that we do not produce organically. That is why having a diet rich in green leafy vegetables, nuts and seeds is enough to have the adequate level of magnesium to have adequate regulation of our coagulation. On another point, if you do not follow the classic Mediterranean diet and hardly consume vegetables, you should undoubtedly opt for supplementation, but always under medical supervision. Because as with everything, Too much can cause problems also for our body. Images | Kenny Eliason Xataka | You will love muscle above all things: how protein fever has led to a cult of the “perfect” body

Warner is in the most delicate moment in its history, but HBO continues to impress with its plans for 2026

HBO Max has taken a group of media to London, including Xataka, so they can learn about first-hand and in the mouth of Casey Bloys, CEO of the platform, its plans for 2026. Of course, the inevitable question was in the air: how can we make plans for 2026 if in the coming weeks, before the end of 2025, we could know that Warner has new owners. Paramount or Netflix They are some of the first swords to bid for the veteran giant, branched into dozens of entertainment and information channels. However, Bloys has been clear: he knows nothing about it (of course, we have asked him directly if he could say anything about it) and it is not his job to manage these types of operations either. What’s more: “they are decisions that do not affect our budgets. (…) The only thing we can control, the only thing we can do, the best we can do, is to continue making plans like this one for 2026. Furthermore, in this business we work about two years in advance. So, right now, we are preparing for 2027 and 2028.” That is, it is too early to know what impact a purchase would have on programming. And Bloys does not speak into a vacuum: tonight in London we have seen about twenty productions that will premiere in 2026, and the truth is that There are titles that aim to boast a quality absolutely beyond any doubtand with the variety of styles and textures that the platform usually boasts: from the superheroic and violent procedural of ‘Lanterns’ to the late and sordid return of ‘Euphoria’, through new proposals as stimulating as the fourth season of ‘Industry’ or the promising ‘DTF St. Louis’. The first thing Bloys has done has been to set the record straight regarding the return of the platform’s traditional name, allowing this year for HBO to appear alongside Max again: “We have brought HBO back back knowing that HBO Max clearly signals that we are the destination for extraordinary voices, different perspectives and narratives for mature audiences. For more than 50 years, this is what HBO has always been and continues to be.” Bloys has boasted million-dollar milestones, but also prestige: ‘Task’ has added 12.6 million viewers per episode globally and ‘It: Welcome to Derry’, 15.4. This summer, ‘Chespirito’ was the most viewed Latin American product in the history of the platform. In the last decade alone, HBO Max has won eight Emmys for Best Drama, four for comedy, seven for limited series and 13 for documentary, and last year it added more nominations than ever before in the life of HBO Max. The platform, in short, has grown by 20 million users in the last year. With all these figures ahead, it is normal for Warner to boast of being a purchase with an attractive catalog for other platforms, but it does not seem to be stepping on the brakes at the moment. Bloys has detailed some of the upcoming releases and the truth is that some of them have a great track. Let’s look at some of the most notable ones. old acquaintances We have had no news about the new season of ‘The House of the Dragon’but yes of a new spin-off of ‘Game of Thrones’: of ‘The Knight of the Seven Kingdoms We have seen a new advance and the truth is that it looks better and better. We will talk about her in more detail in the coming days, since we have had the opportunity to speak with her showrunnerbut from its progress we are left with its curious mixture of humor and the dirty and violent aesthetics of George RR Martin’s creation. There is death and darkness but also gags worthy of a sitcom and parodies that sometimes seem like a medieval ‘Top Secret’. The return of ‘Euphoria’ is also highly anticipated. Its creator Sam Levinson made an appearance in the room, joking with Bloys about how they couldn’t take the characters back to high school after so long, “even though there are other series with thirty-year-old high school students,” in an undisguised jab at ‘Stranger Things’. Bloys has defined ‘Euphoria’ as the current television series with the most powerful cast of stars, and the truth is that since its creation, Zendaya, Sidney Sweeney, Jacob Elordi and Colman Domingo have become leading performers. Levinson states that “it is very nice to see how they win awards, the careers they develop over time.” Lanterns They are not the only ones: the return of ‘Industria’ with a fourth season has also been discussed, we have seen a frenetic trailer for the second season of ‘The Pitt’, which is arriving right now and which promises, at least, the same tension and a good pan of viscera. And beware, ‘Stuart Fails to Save the Universe’, a spin-off of ‘The Big Bang Theory’ starring, in an environment of multidimensional chaos, the owner of the comic book store from the original series. As Bloys says, “a show that Sheldon and Leonard would watch.” Although the most peculiar and most anticipated return has been the third season of ‘The Comeback’, twenty years after the first season and ten after the second, and where Lisa Kudrow (the unforgettable Phoebe from ‘Friends’) and the original creator Michael Patrick King (producer of ‘Sex and the City’) return. In this new satire of the world of series that comes at a sweet time for audiovisual satires after the triumph of ‘The Studio’, the fallen star played by Kudrow will face the threat of AI… but without science fiction elements. Casey Bloys New passions The truth is that What has caught our attention the most and best have been the new series. For example, ‘DTF St. Louis’ is a limited series about a love triangle between three adults (Jason Bateman, David Harbor and Linda Cardellini) that begins as a clumsy way of managing a midlife crisis and ends with one of them dead. Or it’s … Read more

Crucial was the gateway to the world of the PC for millions of users. AI has just put an end to its story

Many users remember the moment when they decided to build or improve their first computer: the search for a fast SSDa RAM kit and the feeling that the PC world was within anyone’s reach. That vision, extended for almost thirty years, is now going through a turning point. The explosion of artificial intelligence has altered the balance of the memory business and has pushed suppliers like Micron to make decisions that would have seemed unthinkable a short time ago. Micron just announced that it will stop selling consumer products under the Crucial brand. The company announced that it will continue to ship memory modules and storage units until the end of its second fiscal quarter, in February 2026, and that it will maintain warranty service for devices already in the hands of users. In parallel, it will continue to operate its business catalog with Micron products for commercial customers. The announcement came accompanied by a precise explanation: the company wants to prioritize attention to segments where demand is growing more quickly. The message of Sumit Sadana, executive vice president of Micron Technology. “AI-driven growth in data centers has driven a surge in demand for memory and storage. Micron has made the difficult decision to exit Crucial’s consumer business to improve supply and support to our largest strategic customers in higher growth segments.” The brand that grew with the home PC. Since its launch in 1996, Crucial was presented as Micron’s branch dedicated to memory and storage upgrades for the home user. Over the years, the brand entered more categories, such as memory cards and external drives. Its constant presence in physical stores and online distributors helped establish it as a household name in the components market. That 29-year trajectory is what is now behind us with Micron’s decision. The pressure of AI on memory. The rise of AI computing has generated unprecedented demand for memory, especially from HBM, used in accelerators from NVIDIA, AMD and other companies. This type of components requires complex manufacturing processes and absorbs a large part of the manufacturers’ capacity, that concentrate resources on meeting business contracts. Fewer options for mounting and expanding PCs. After years of presence in the consumer channel, Crucial leaves a gap that mainly affects the variety of the available catalog. Although there are still alternatives, the departure of a supplier with such a constant presence means fewer options when choosing memory modules or storage units. The price of RAM memory, increasing. Crucical’s farewell occurs at a time when the price of RAM has skyrocketed 300% since September. And, at least according to data from the consultancy TrendForce, everything seems to indicate that the increase in the cost of computer modules is far from over. Images | Micron | Nathan Anderson In Xataka | The war to dethrone NVIDIA has just begun: Amazon and Google are already armed

Amazon and Google are already armed

Let’s go back in time for a moment. By mid-2023, ChatGPT He had been between us for half a year and artificial intelligence was experiencing a huge boom. For some it was a fad; For others, one of the most relevant technological disruptions of recent times. OpenAI had the lead. From being practically unknown, she went on to dominate headlines. He achieved this by putting a product as fascinating as it was imperfect in the hands of the public, the type of launch that Big Tech would hardly have materialized. In its early months, ChatGPT had few guardrails and made mistakes quite frequently. Such a setback would have meant a reputational blow Huge for any tech giant, but a startup could possibly take that risk. NVIDIA, the winner in the AI ​​race, faces a challenge The basis for competing head-to-head with ChatGPT was—and continues to be—developing increasingly advanced language models. After launching GPT-3.5the model that gave rise to ChatGPT, OpenAI moved quickly to introduce GPT-4 in March 2023. From that moment on, the old and new players in the sector had no alternative but to enter the game, unless they wanted to stay out of what was already aiming to be the next technological revolution. And whatever the name of the company, they all depended on one key player: NVIDIA. The reason? Jensen Huang’s firm had the best AI-specialized GPUs on the market, with the H100 as standard bearer. And we talk about GPUs because they are much more suitable than CPUs for the parallel processing tasks that modern AI requires. The approach was simple: if you wanted to compete in generative AI—and hopefully aspire to lead it—you needed to buy NVIDIA GPUs, upgrade your data centers or open new ones. And all this against the clock. The result was massive demand that sometimes led to shortages. An illustrative example: at the beginning of 2024, Meta announced that Its renewed infrastructure for generative AI would reach 350,000 NVIDIA H100 GPUs by the end of the year, with a power equivalent to about 600,000 H100. By June 2024, NVIDIA was already the most valuable listed company on the planet. It is often said that the difficult thing is not to get to the top—that too—but to stay there. That’s exactly the challenge NVIDIA faces now. Their products remain at the top and its strategy covers much more than hardware: it includes a stack of software designed to make the most of the architecture CUDA. But the competition is knocking on the door loudly, the same as with OpenAI. The leadership of these years is pressured by increasingly fierce and global competition. Amazon and Google’s bet on AI chips The most recent move comes from Amazon, which has just introduced Trainium3 UltraServer, a system powered by its AI chip Trainium3 manufactured in 3 nanometers. According to the companythese chips and systems are 40% more energy efficient than the previous generation. And it doesn’t end there. Amazon also showed its roadmap for Trainium4, already in development. It promised support for NVLink Fusion, NVIDIA’s high-speed chip interconnect technology, opening the door to interoperable systems. Trn2 Ultra Cluster Google, which has been developing its TPU chips for AI for a decade, is starting to bet on its own hardware to boost Gemini. Even rumors circulate that talk about a multimillion-dollar investment by Meta to buy AI chips from Google, a move that enters squarely into AI territory. We would also be facing a quite notable change of course in the search engine company, which until now had limited the use of its chips to its own data centers. Ironwood by Google Do you remember that Meta is one of NVIDIA’s big clients? Well, it is also developing—and testing—its own AI chips, such as the MTIA. Even OpenAI has decided to partner with Broadcom to design their own hardware for their data centers. In China, the scenario does not favor NVIDIA either. The trade war with the United States has narrowed its room for maneuver in the country, while local actors such as Huawei they push their own chipswith the Ascend 910D already in production and Ascend 920 new generation. Ultimately, we are seeing many of the players who turned to NVIDIA in the early stages of the AI ​​race beginning to follow their own path. The reasons are multiple, but one stands out above all: the need for independence in a technological competition that only intensifies. Images | World Governments Summit | amazon | Google In Xataka | If you think the internet was much better before AI, congratulations: they have created an extension for you

They have created an extension for you

We already warned you, AI is ruining the internet and things have not improved. I recently talked about how Etsy, the craft platform par excellence, had become a minefield riddled with AI. I have encountered this problem myself by searching for decoration ideas or haircuts on Pinterest. Distinguish what is real and what is not It’s impossible. Given this scenario, someone has had a radical idea: travel to the past Slop Evader This is the name of the invention of Tega Brainan artist and researcher who, like many people, is also tired of finding AI in absolutely every corner of the internet. The author admits in 404media that he was thinking of ways to avoid all the AI ​​’slop’ that plagues the internet and “the simplest and silliest way to do it is to only look before 2022.” Slop Evader is a browser extension that filters searches so that only results older than November 30, 2022 appear. Why that date? because it was on ChatGPT launch day. The extension is compatible with Firefox and Chrome, which means that you can also install it on any Chromium-based browser such as Microsoft Edge, Brave, Opera or Vivaldi. To install it, simply access it through one of the following links: Return to the pre-AI era This is what this extension wants to achieve. After installing it, we can click on the extension icon and a panel like the one you can see in the image will open. In it, we have seven search fields for different websites: Google, Reddit, Quora, Stack Exchange, Mumset, Pinterest and YouTube. The author plans to expand the available sites. Obviously, if you need to find updated results, this tool is not for you, since you will only be able to see things from three years ago. But the objective of Slop Evader is not to be a productivity tool, but to denounce a situation that, far from improving, seems to be every day it gets worse. Of course, even though it is not its objective, it has already been useful to me and I have been able to look for ideas for curly haircuts without the AI ​​ending up confusing me. The permanent doubt Until recently it was relatively easy to detect what was made with AI and what was not. The first slop either AI filth that flooded the networks It was detected instantly; Of course, these were animals and people with impossible anatomies that transformed into the most disturbing beasts. The arrival of new video generation tools like Sora 2 They have made many videos pass as real. Who hasn’t had an AI video shared without knowing it? And if they haven’t shared it with you, you probably have. Click on the image to access the post in X. Much AI content is still detectable to the trained eye, but the arrival of Nano Banana Pro has crossed the line of what is real and what is not. A few days ago my colleague Javier Lacort said that we have just entered the era of permanent doubtone in which looking at an image will automatically make us suspicious and think twice before sharing it, lest we end up looking like a boomer. Is extra cognitive work What we will have to do with each of the images we see every day. It’s no small thing. And there is not only generative AI in social networks. I commented at the beginning about the case of Etsy, but the thing is that AI is reaching Idealista, where there are advertisements with immaculate houses that later turn out to be falling apart. The excuse is that “this is how you see how it would look renovated.” Slop Evader He reports the problem, but it doesn’t solve it. This will require a more forceful effort on the part of the large platforms and even governments that will allow real images to be verified from those generated by AI. Images | Slop Evader, Xataka In Xataka | The ChatGPT Atlas agent made my purchase at Mercadona and now I have a pantry full of garlic

that of World War II

The political tension that China and Japan live has added a new chapter: the recent confrontation between boats of both nations near the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands shows the extent to which the balance in East Asia has entered a phase of constant friction. China has issued a hitherto unpublished “diplomatic letter”: that of the Second World War. Sea climbing. The incident, presented in an opposite way by the coast guards of both countries, it is not an isolated episodebut the visible expression of a historical dispute that has been intensified by broader strategic factors: the Chinese military rise, growing Japanese unrest over the Taiwan security and the systemic pressure that China exerts in the region. In a space of just a handful of uninhabited islets, a decade of increased Chinese patrolling, an increase in the Japanese presence and a climate of suspicion fueled now by the more explicit tone of the new leadership in Tokyo is condensed. The chinese reactionwhich insists that its presence in the area is a way of “asserting its rights,” is combined with an internal message of firmness in the face of a Japan that, from Beijing’s point of view, is crossing red lines. The Chinese diplomatic offensive. As we said at the beginning, Beijing has accompanied its maritime deployment with a diplomatic campaign that revives episodes of World War II as a tool of political pressure. China’s appeals to the United Kingdom, France and the United States to line up against Japan reveal a tactical change: transforming a territorial and strategic dispute into a narrative battle that positions Tokyo as an actor that “reverses history” and threatens regional stability. They remembered in the NYT that the references point to revive sensitivities that condemned Japanese expansionism eight decades ago, but are now used to try to discredit a Japan that has verbalized, unusual shapethat a Chinese attack on Taiwan could force it to act militarily. The chinese answer (tourist boycotts, cancellation of imports, public singling out of Japanese politicians) combines economic pressure with nationalist rhetorica pattern Beijing has used before, although rarely with this intensity. Not only that, the campaign also aims to stop any European rapprochement with Taiwan, especially following recent political gestures in Brussels and Berlin that Beijing perceives as a normalization of European support for the island. Senkaku Japan breaks silence. We explained it last week. The words by Sanae Takaichi on the possibility that a Chinese attack or blockade of Taiwan would pose a direct threat to Japanese survival have had an immediate effect: they have publicly revealed a doctrinal line that had been quietly consolidating for years. Japan always understood that its destiny was intertwined with the stability of the Taiwan Strait, yet the clarity with which the prime minister articulated this position marked a turning point. The chinese reaction (accusations of militarism, veiled threats, economic pressures and an increase in the activities of its coast guard) reflects Beijing’s fear that the relationship between Tokyo and Washington will crystallize into a political and military bloc willing to respond in a coordinated manner to a Chinese escalation. If you will also, anxiety worsens as the Taiwanese political cycle of 2028 approaches: if the Democratic Progressive Party chains another term, the possibility of a stronger Taiwanese identity and a sustained rejection of unification would ignite all the alarms in Beijing. Therefore, any sign that Japan will no longer remain in strategic ambiguity alters the Chinese calculus. Tension and risk. The sum of these events builds a scenario in which each movement seems to have multiple layers of meaning. The Chinese pressure on Taiwan It is no longer just military or economic, it is accompanied by disinformation campaigns, naval maneuvers and calculated use of internal nationalism. Plus: the Japanese response, by making explicit that Taiwan’s security is also own securityreturns Beijing to a deeper dilemma. Admit that its pressure can provoke exactly what it wants to avoid, that is, the consolidation of an international coalition willing to consider itself an interested party in the future of the island. Uncertainty. This phenomenon creates especially volatile terrain, because any action by China around Taiwan (a partial blockade, new trade restrictions, an increase in military exercises) could be interpreted by Tokyo and Washington as a prelude to aggravated coercion. The Chinese narrative, invoke historical wounds, increases the risk that domestic public opinion will limit the Chinese leadership’s ability to back down without appearing weak. Critical point. Ultimately, the combination of hostility at seadiplomatic pressure in Europe, demonstrations of strength around Taiwan and Japan’s decision to speak clearly constitutes a decisive moment for strategic balance of the Indo-Pacific. If Japan and the United States maintain their firm stance, China will have to weigh the cost of an escalation which could lead to a confrontation that is beyond their control. If, on the other hand, either of the two actors backs down, Beijing will interpret that the pressure is working and will possibly increase its pressure against the island, reinforcing the idea that international inaction opens space for a unilateral resolution of the conflict. Image | Al Jazeera English In Xataka | China had a tank more typical of science fiction. Now he has added a hypersonic missile in a video that attacks Japan In Xataka | China is sending drones to an island 100 km from Taiwan. The problem is that Japan and the US are filling it with missiles

These three alternatives want to change the rules

Artificial intelligence chatbots have crept into our daily lives without asking permission. We talk to them to work, resolve doubts or simply vent, but many times we overlook an important detail: services as popular as ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot They use these conversations by default to train their models. And there they end up ranging from personal issues to work issues that perhaps we would never share with a stranger. For anyone who values ​​privacy, this may be a cause for concern. Turning off training from the settings menu helps, but does not eliminate all risks. There is some possibility that a security breach could also expose conversations. So the question that we haven’t quite resolved returns again: are there alternatives that really put privacy first? And if there are, which ones work best? AI chatbots that better protect our privacy In a new video from Xataka’s YouTube channelFrancisco Franconi tries to shed light on this dilemma. He himself admits that he is not the best example of prudence: over the years he has turned sensitive information in ChatGPT. “He has my tax return, my medical history, he knows what time I walk my dog, how many days I have left on vacation,” he confesses. But this time he is determined to change the rules of the game. After testing several options, it has selected three alternatives that focus on privacy and that also have free versions. He acknowledges that there are more, but he preferred to focus on those that really convinced him. The first is Venice. “Your data is encrypted and are stored locally in your browser and not on its servers,” explains Franco, highlighting one of its big claims. The way Venice works is peculiar: it adopts a different mechanic than usual to manage messages, a process that he details step by step in the video and that helps to understand why it fits so well into a more secure approach. The second proposal is the work of an old privacy acquaintance. “If you are a freak privacy, you most likely know the DuckDuckGo search engine, an alternative to Google that became famous for not track your searches or your history,” says our colleague before presenting Duck.AI. The tool, he assures, has been very well received and its philosophy is clear: “It does not compete by offering its own model, but rather guarantees privacy in the use of commercial or third-party models,” he adds. In the video, Franco also shares practical recommendations for getting the most out of Duck.AI, which is useful if you are looking for a chatbot that fits into more intensive workflows. The third option is, perhaps, the least known, but also the one that makes the most forceful declaration of intentions: Okara. For Franco, this platform is “a declaration of war on the data business model.” Its proposal is supported by its own infrastructure, open source models and an encryption approach that gives full control to the user. “Although your history is stored on their servers, it is encrypted in such a way that only you can decrypt it using your key,” he explains. In addition to explaining how Okara works and what advantages it brings, Franco also talks about its limitations. For some users they will be minor details, but for others they can tip the balance towards one platform or another. Each of these alternatives offers a different approach, but a common goal: privacy. And you, which one would you choose? Have you tried any or are you tempted to take the leap? We read you in the comments. And remember that you can see the full video in the Xataka YouTube channel. Images | Xataka In Xataka | DeepSeek has launched its new reasoner model. It’s free and beats GPT-5

prove that it can also be a PC

a user shared on Reddit how he managed to install iPadOS on a iPhone 17 Pro Max taking advantage of a security exploit, allowing the phone to benefit from opening multiple windows simultaneously, desktop apps and even support for an external monitor. All to demonstrate how Apple keeps locked capabilities that the iPhone’s own hardware already has. What has happened. The user, who calls himself ‘TechExpert2910’, has published several tests of your iPhone 17 Pro Max running the iPad operating system. It’s not a simulation or an app: it’s iPadOS running natively. The device features multitasking with floating windows, a full desktop interface when connected to an external monitor, and apps normally only available on iPad. All this without affecting performance, as explained by the hacker himself in his publication. Click on the image to go to the post The trick behind the hack. The modification takes advantage of an exploit present in iOS 26.1 which tricks the operating system into thinking it is running on an iPad instead of an iPhone. This unlocks features like a landscape home screen, iPad-style app switcher, more items in the Dock, and, most notably, a full system of floating windows and multitasking management. Apple has already patched this vulnerability in the iOS 26.2 beta, confirming that Apple was aware and wanted to put an end to it. Why it works so well. The key is that iOS and iPadOS share practically all of their code base. “it turns out that iOS has all the iPadOS code (and vice versa; you can, for example, activate Dynamic Island on iPad),” they cited in Wired. They are not different operating systems, but variants of the same software with features enabled or disabled depending on the device. The iPhone 17 Pro Max comes equipped with the chip A19 Pro and 12 GB of RAM, so it has plenty of power to run iPadOS. Apple boasted so much about this chip at its September event that the company even claimed that it offers “MacBook Pro levels of computing.” The foldable iPhone hypothesis. There are many who suggest that this hidden capacity could be prepared for the future foldable iPhone that Apple would plan to launch in the future. And of course, it would be very crazy to think that a device with much more screen space would not take advantage of its larger size with functions like those found on an iPad, especially in terms of multitasking. The debate over Apple’s strategy. The hacker accuses Apple of artificially limiting its devices to force the purchase of more products. The logic makes sense, since Apple has historically prospered by selling a complete ecosystem where each device has its defined space. However, as they point out from Wccftech, this strategy has precedents in Android: Samsung has been offering since 2017 DeXwhich converts mobile phones into desktop computers, without this having necessarily damaged its sales of tablets or laptops. What does this say about the future?. This experiment demonstrates three things. First: the lines of separation between iPhone, iPad and Mac are increasingly blurred. Second: Apple has the tools ready to offer a desktop mode on iPhone, but chooses not to. And third: all the reports suggest that the first foldable iPhone could have a system very similar to iPadOS, if not the same. Although it seems that we will have to wait to find out first-hand what Apple’s strategy will end up being. Cover image | TechExpert2910 (Reddit) In Xataka | How to send files from your Android to an iPhone using Quick Share with AirDrop

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.