The IMAX format of Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is an ambitious experiment. So much so that in most cinemas the film will be seen mutilated

The official website of ‘The Odyssey’ by Christopher Nolan has a very unusual function: in the Explore Formats sectiona selector allows you to see the same trailer in six different formats, from the almost perfect square of IMAX 70mm to the wide panoramic view of conventional 35mm. It is a promotional decision that reinforces the idea that Nolan is extraordinarily concerned with image and the format of your film. But… what if what this gadget transmits is just the opposite? The formats. What changes between one format and another is the proportion of the image, the shape of the plane. In IMAX 70mm, the format in which the film was originally shot, a person is in the center of the screen, with “air”, or a part of the image without vital information, above and below; In the 35mm format that most audiences will see in conventional cinemas, that same shot appears cropped from above and below, eliminating that superfluous information. You just have to compare the trailer on the film’s website with the tools that are provided to us: the story is the same but the image is, literally, from two different films. Aspect Rancio Facts. It is worth clarifying a little what this is aspect ratio, the relationship between width and height of the image. Basically, it determines what the viewer sees and what the director leaves out of the frame. It is, basically, the minimum compositional decision in cinema. And the framing differences can be very noticeable: in the 2.39:1 widescreen version, a considerable part of the image is cropped compared to the IMAX 70mm in 1.43:1. Only a few theaters in the world can show the film in IMAX 70mm, so many IMAX theaters present the films in 1.90:1, which is the second largest format, much closer to the traditional scope. The third in size is the standard 70mm at 2.20:1, which is not very different in height from the traditional 2.39:1 35mm widescreen. In other words: the IMAX 70mm in 1.43:1 shows up to 40% more image than standard screens. Translated to the plane: what is cut out in the conventional distribution are not the sides (the width is preserved) but the top and bottom of the frame. The 70mm horizontal runs across the projector rather than vertically, creating that monstrous frame size. But it’s not just a question of seeing more or less, but of what is seen and what is not. Or to put it another way: if Nolan assumes that we are not going to see 40% in widescreen… has he included a 40% superfluous image in IMAX? And this affects planning, of course: in a very close-up of a face in IMAX, will we see only the actor’s face in conventional cinemas, without a stage around it? Cinephile elitism. On July 17, 2026, when ‘The Odyssey’ hits theaters, the viewer’s experience will depend, to a large extent, on where they live. Only 30 theaters in the world are equipped to offer the IMAX 70mm format, and none of them in Spain. There are rooms here that project in 70mm and there are also IMAX rooms, but none have both at the same time. The only cinema in the country that will offer the two options, although separately, are the Palafox Cinemas in Zaragoza: their room 4 will project in 70mm five-perforations, while on July 17, coinciding with the premiere, they will inaugurate a new IMAX room. Only theaters with IMAX 70mm can reproduce the film exactly as it was photographed. The other versions preserve much of the visual presentation, but crop or reduce parts of the original image, as we have seen. That has sparked a debate that has been going on for weeks. circulating on social networks: There is talk of elitism and that Nolan is turning his back on his audience, and the reason is that the planning, as we have seen, changes drastically from one format to another… and the frames have been planned for a very minority format. The framing is what you are looking for. Because there is a question that Nolan has not answered: did they compose each shot also thinking about the 2.39:1 crop? When Nolan was mixing formats in ‘Dunkirk’ or ‘Interstellar’ (using IMAX only for certain sequences and the rest in scope), the composition of each scene was planned for its specific format. The visual leap between square and panoramic formats was part of the film’s language: the horizon literally widened in moments of maximum tension. The decision to shoot 100% of ‘The Odyssey’ in IMAX, instead of the usual 60-70% in his previous films, means that the dialogue shots between two actors are also in 1.43:1. In 2.39:1, those same shots will lose vertical information from the original frame. The premiere on July 17 will reveal, with the support of the public, whether it has paid off for Nolan to shoot, literally, for thirty theaters around the world. In Xataka | There are people very angry about the inaccuracies in Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’. But not because of the uniforms: because of the diversity

There are people very angry about the inaccuracies in Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’. But not because of the uniforms: because of the diversity

The most expensive and ambitious film of the summer of 2026, ‘The Odyssey’ by Christopher Nolanhas generated a controversy that already sounds old, but that the conservative factions of the Internet never tire of recovering again and again. The African-American Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy and, possibly, the trans actor Elliot Page as the Ghost of Achilles are two casting choices that have defenders of fidelity to the original text infuriated. Delivery and delivery. The first film of Nolan’s career shot entirely on 70mm IMAX cameras hits theaters on July 17. Nolan, very cleverly, announced his casting practically in full (Matt Damon is Odysseus, Anne Hathaway is Penelope, Tom Holland is Telemachus, Zendaya is Athena, Charlize Theron is Calypso, Jon Bernthal is Menelaus, Benny Safdie is Agamemnon and Robert Pattinson is Antinous) and left out two additions that he knew would make a certain part of the internet up in arms. Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy has been announced later, and Elliot Page as the Ghost of Achilles has not yet been officially confirmed. The rich cry too. The negative reaction came, in large part, from X, with Elon Musk as the main amplifier. The owner of the platform accused Nolan of having chosen these actors to satisfy the diversity quotas of the Hollywood Academy, summarizing his thesis with the phrase “He wants the awards“(He wants the prizes). Kevin Sorbo, known for playing Hercules in the 1990s television series (not exactly the best example of adapting classic myths faithful to the sources) joined the criticism. According to has been countedare recurring themes in Musk’s speech, who, for example, published content alluding to racial theories or anti-immigration conspiracies on 26 of the 31 days of January 2026. We have already seen it. We have seen this reaction on numerous occasions, always from the same sector of the public, and always criticizing casting choices to make it diverse. Disney has suffered it with the latest versions of ‘Snow White’ and ‘The Little Mermaid‘, he made a considerable mess with ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power‘ and his racialized elves. And the Star Wars universe has been enduring these criticisms since the premiere of ‘The Force Awakens’. Troy, bad example. The film that Musk and a good part of his followers invoke as a counterpoint is ‘Troy’, Wolfgang Petersen’s peplum starring Brad Pitt that was released in 2004. There were those who did direct comparisons between Petersen’s version and Nolan’s. But there are countless problems here. ‘Troy’ adapts ‘The Iliad’, not ‘The Odyssey’, and does so very loosely: Patroclus becomes Achilles’ cousin rather than his companion; Briseis kills Agamemnon, destroying the ‘Oresteia’ in the process; Andromache and Astyanax flee through a system of tunnels; compresses a ten-year war into a few weeks; and completely eliminates the Olympian gods. About the Oscars. The most widespread accusation is that Nolan is diversifying the cast to meet the Academy representation and inclusion standardsapproved in 2020 and effective from 2024. The reasoning seems solid at first glance. But the Academy system works differently: a film has to meet two of four possible standards. Standard A refers to the cast, but standards B, C and D cover the creative team, distributor training programs and the composition of the marketing teams. It is perfectly possible to meet the criteria with Caucasian actors. And there is one’s ownOppenheimer‘ (entirely white cast, seven Oscars including Best Picture and Best Director) to prove it. How did he get it? Its costume designer, production director, editor and makeup manager were women; Universal, the distributor, has scholarship programs and marketing managers from underrepresented groups, including a woman as president (Donna Langley) and a black man as head of domestic marketing (Dwight Caines). That accusation falls by itself. Nolan’s response. The director, without needing to mention Musk’s tears, alluded to the controversy in an interview. Nolan defended the historical rigor of the production (including the blackened Mycenaean bronze of the armor, which some users had compared to Batman’s suit) and justified the casting of rapper Travis Scott as an aedo with an argument of artistic coherence: he wanted to emphasize that ‘The Odyssey’ was transmitted as oral poetry, and that rap is the contemporary equivalent of that tradition. The intention, according to the director, is not that the public agrees with each decision, but rather that they do not think that the material has been taken lightly. In Xataka | “It’s not completely understood”: Christopher Nolan admits the harsh reality about ‘Tenet’ and proposes a solution

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.