Christopher Nolan explains why he filmed ‘The Odyssey’ in IMAX

Christopher Nolan has not chosen the 65mm IMAX format for ‘The Odyssey’ as a simple technical boast. In reality, for this director it is a narrative tool at the service of a mythological scale story. Homer’s poem tells of endless sea voyages, storms, monsters and a journey that tests the limits of human endurance. Nolan wanted the viewer feel that immensity in a physical waynot just intellectual. And the only way to achieve this, as the director himself explained, was to completely fill the visual field of the movie theater. This ambition explains why, unlike previous works such as ‘Batman: The Dark Knight’, ‘Interstellar’ or ‘Oppenheimer’where IMAX is reserved for certain sequences of great impact, in ‘The Odyssey’ this format is maintained throughout the entire footage. Nolan has thus broken his own habit of alternating formats according to the intensity of each scene. The Homeric epic demands that the feeling of grandeur never wane, not even in the most intimate passages of the plot. IMAX’s 1.43:1 aspect ratio, much more vertical than the usual widescreen image in commercial cinema, is the key to this decision. By filling the viewer’s peripheral vision, this format generates a sense of depth similar to 3D without the need for glasses, something Nolan considers essential to convey the magnitude of the landscapes and battles. The director has summed up his philosophy with a forceful phrase: it sought to offer the public “something new and exciting”, an experience that no other format could give with the same intensity. IMAX demands as much as it promises The heart of this creative ambition is an exceptional negative. The IMAX film format, technically known as 15/70, uses 15 perforations per frame compared to the usual four for 35mm, which increases the size of the negative tenfold. The result is a horizontal resolution that is around 18,000 theoretical pixels, compared to the 1,920 pixel width of a high definition home screen (which together with its 1,080 vertical lines makes up the Full HD standard), and a sharpness that Nolan considers unsurpassable even compared to productions shot directly in digital. Filming with this technology for an entire feature film has required developing new equipment. IMAX cameras are traditionally very noisy for filming dialoguesso the team created a silencer they call blimp (we can translate it as soundproof casing). The resulting camera, named ‘The Keighley’ after veteran IMAX executives Patricia and David Keighley, weighs about 300 pounds packed into its soundproof casing. Nolan maintains that the resulting image retains a quality superior to that of any digital production. In addition, the physical support adds another layer of demand. The celluloid tape had to be recharged every two and a half to three minutes, and a mirror system had to be installed so that the actors could see each other around this bulky device during filming. This celluloid also advances horizontally through the projector using a technique called rolling loopand a single 45-minute roll can weigh 140 kilos and exceed 4,600 meters in length. Nolan maintains that, even when this negative is scanned to digitize it and adapt it to rooms with laser projectors, the resulting image retains superior quality to that of any production born in digital. This conviction explains his insistence on defending celluloid against the advance of digital tools, a position that he has maintained consistently throughout his entire career. All this technical demand has a very high cost during the exhibition process: only about 40 theaters around the world can project IMAX in its full combination of 70 mm and giant screen, and finding trained personnel to handle these prints is increasingly difficult in an industry focused on digital for almost two decades. Spain, despite having several digital IMAX theaters and with projection in traditional 70 mm, it does not have any that combines both technologies, so the Spanish public will have to settle for digital versions that crop the image to a more panoramic aspect ratio, losing some of the visual information that Nolan captured at the top and bottom margins of the frame. In Xataka | The brutal collection of ‘The Odyssey’ confirms that the most profitable franchise of the moment is not Marvel or DC: it is Christopher Nolan In Xataka | One theory says that Ulysses was held in Perejil. And that we owe the name of Spain to it

The IMAX format of Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is an ambitious experiment. So much so that in most cinemas the film will be seen mutilated

The official website of ‘The Odyssey’ by Christopher Nolan has a very unusual function: in the Explore Formats sectiona selector allows you to see the same trailer in six different formats, from the almost perfect square of IMAX 70mm to the wide panoramic view of conventional 35mm. It is a promotional decision that reinforces the idea that Nolan is extraordinarily concerned with image and the format of your film. But… what if what this gadget transmits is just the opposite? The formats. What changes between one format and another is the proportion of the image, the shape of the plane. In IMAX 70mm, the format in which the film was originally shot, a person is in the center of the screen, with “air”, or a part of the image without vital information, above and below; In the 35mm format that most audiences will see in conventional cinemas, that same shot appears cropped from above and below, eliminating that superfluous information. You just have to compare the trailer on the film’s website with the tools that are provided to us: the story is the same but the image is, literally, from two different films. Aspect Rancio Facts. It is worth clarifying a little what this is aspect ratio, the relationship between width and height of the image. Basically, it determines what the viewer sees and what the director leaves out of the frame. It is, basically, the minimum compositional decision in cinema. And the framing differences can be very noticeable: in the 2.39:1 widescreen version, a considerable part of the image is cropped compared to the IMAX 70mm in 1.43:1. Only a few theaters in the world can show the film in IMAX 70mm, so many IMAX theaters present the films in 1.90:1, which is the second largest format, much closer to the traditional scope. The third in size is the standard 70mm at 2.20:1, which is not very different in height from the traditional 2.39:1 35mm widescreen. In other words: the IMAX 70mm in 1.43:1 shows up to 40% more image than standard screens. Translated to the plane: what is cut out in the conventional distribution are not the sides (the width is preserved) but the top and bottom of the frame. The 70mm horizontal runs across the projector rather than vertically, creating that monstrous frame size. But it’s not just a question of seeing more or less, but of what is seen and what is not. Or to put it another way: if Nolan assumes that we are not going to see 40% in widescreen… has he included a 40% superfluous image in IMAX? And this affects planning, of course: in a very close-up of a face in IMAX, will we see only the actor’s face in conventional cinemas, without a stage around it? Cinephile elitism. On July 17, 2026, when ‘The Odyssey’ hits theaters, the viewer’s experience will depend, to a large extent, on where they live. Only 30 theaters in the world are equipped to offer the IMAX 70mm format, and none of them in Spain. There are rooms here that project in 70mm and there are also IMAX rooms, but none have both at the same time. The only cinema in the country that will offer the two options, although separately, are the Palafox Cinemas in Zaragoza: their room 4 will project in 70mm five-perforations, while on July 17, coinciding with the premiere, they will inaugurate a new IMAX room. Only theaters with IMAX 70mm can reproduce the film exactly as it was photographed. The other versions preserve much of the visual presentation, but crop or reduce parts of the original image, as we have seen. That has sparked a debate that has been going on for weeks. circulating on social networks: There is talk of elitism and that Nolan is turning his back on his audience, and the reason is that the planning, as we have seen, changes drastically from one format to another… and the frames have been planned for a very minority format. The framing is what you are looking for. Because there is a question that Nolan has not answered: did they compose each shot also thinking about the 2.39:1 crop? When Nolan was mixing formats in ‘Dunkirk’ or ‘Interstellar’ (using IMAX only for certain sequences and the rest in scope), the composition of each scene was planned for its specific format. The visual leap between square and panoramic formats was part of the film’s language: the horizon literally widened in moments of maximum tension. The decision to shoot 100% of ‘The Odyssey’ in IMAX, instead of the usual 60-70% in his previous films, means that the dialogue shots between two actors are also in 1.43:1. In 2.39:1, those same shots will lose vertical information from the original frame. The premiere on July 17 will reveal, with the support of the public, whether it has paid off for Nolan to shoot, literally, for thirty theaters around the world. In Xataka | There are people very angry about the inaccuracies in Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’. But not because of the uniforms: because of the diversity

Doomsday. Disney’s response has been to invent its own IMAX

On December 18, 2026, two of the most anticipated blockbusters of the last decade share release date. Warner Bros. has contracted exclusivity on all IMAX screens in the United States for ‘Dune: Part Three’ for three weeks. It is a vital space for the box office blockbusters of this type, so Disney, following Bender’s teachings on the moon from the legendary pilot episode of ‘Futurama’, decides to set up its own IMAX for ‘Doomsday‘. He called it Infinity Vision. The contract of evil. The key is in a contract signed before both premieres collided. Warner Bros. booked December 18, 2026 for ‘Dune: Part Three’ in June 2024, almost a year before Disney moved ‘Avengers: Doomsday’ on that same date. Under this contract, Villeneuve’s film has all IMAX screens blocked for three consecutive weeks starting December 18, leaving the Marvel film without access to that circuit in the US market. In favor of ‘Dune’. In addition to the contractual issue, there is an added topic: ‘Dune: Part Three’ has been filmed mainly with 65mm IMAX cameraswhile ‘Avengers: Doomsday’ has done so with IMAX certified digital cameras. For the IMAX standard, there is a difference: the 65mm negative produces a native image in the expanded format of the characteristic IMAX screens, which makes ‘Dune 3’ a more technically competent release. Something that IMAX will undoubtedly use as a selling ingredient. Despite insistent rumors, it seems that Marvel will not move the release date, and Kevin Feige confirmed it at CinemaCon. Infinity Vision arrives. It was there where Disney announced Infinity Vision as a new certification for premium rooms. This is a seal that will help the viewer “find the best screens in their area.” This rating refers to the largest possible screen sizes, laser projection for superior brightness and sharpness, and premium audio formats for an immersive sound experience. That is to say, about 75 certified rooms in the United States and more than 300 globally. What Infinity Vision is not. It is not a new format. It is simply a certification for rooms that already exist and can boast high-quality equipment. IMAX, with its characteristic aspect ratio of 1.43:1, is a different experience from traditional cinema, a space that Infinity Vision does not come out of, no matter how much it is applied to high-quality screens. The Infinity Vision certificate will start with the re-release of ‘Endgame’, as an appetizer before the arrival of ‘Doomsday’. Why IMAX matters. To understand why Disney has a problem, let’s look at the numbers. IMAX occupies less than 5% of the screens, but for large studio productions it represents between 15% and 25% of the collection of the first weekend. For example, ‘Dune: Part Two‘ grossed $81.5 million domestically and $178.5 million worldwide in its opening weekend, with premium formats (IMAX and 70mm) accounting for 48% of the total opening business. That is, almost half of the box office concentrated in a small percentage of the theaters. With ‘Oppenheimer’, IMAX generated 35 million global dollars in the premiere alone, 20% of the opening total. EITHER said by the CEO of IMAX himselfRichard Gelfond: the format has added 15% of the box office in premium releases during 2025. IMAX’s global revenues are on track to exceed $1.4 billion in 2026and ‘Dune 3’ is one of the main drivers of that growth. Disney, for its part, is the largest contributor to IMAX revenue among all the Hollywood studios, which gives an idea of ​​the volume of business that is at stake with ‘Doomsday’. The precedent. In 2025, Jurassic World Rebirth was one of the few big blockbusters that could not have a premiere in IMAX for scheduling reasons. Some analysts blame this for its somewhat weaker performance than other deliveries. Meanwhile, Warner has already reported that the 70mm IMAX screenings of ‘Dune: Part Three’ they have already sold out in 19 locations in North America and London. A panorama for ‘Doomsday’ that, although it does not point to problems for what will undoubtedly be one of the great assets at the box office this year, may have more than one anxious executive in the Disney offices. In Xataka | If you download ‘Torrente Presidente’, Santiago Segura has the same message for you as if you downloaded ‘Torrente 3’

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.