fast

There are skirts that go fast, there are scooters that are going very fast and then there are scooters like The Turbo: 160 km/h

by

What are all in common, absolutely all the electric scooters that any Spaniard can buy? That are limited, by law, at 25 km/h. It doesn’t matter if it is worth 200 or 1,500 euros, the scooter cannot pass that speed. That contrasts, of course, with what is capable of getting the fastest electric scooter in the world. Your name? Bo the Turbo. Your maximum speed? More than 160 km/h. Where does this come from? BO is a British company born in 2019 whose founders have advanced engineering experience in Formula 1. Roughly, BO is a company dedicated to electric scooters and its latest proposal is the Bo the Turbo, a conventional scooter on the outside but that, inside, has a double engine and a motor competition train “with a power-pepper ratio superior to that of the Bugatti Veyron“, according to the company. Bo the Turbo | Image: bo Excessive power. The device, because of scooters only has the form factor, has a power of up to 24,000W. For development, BO was associated with Rage Mechanics and applied the Safesteer stabilizer, his own technology, which basically assists the driver when he passes through a pothole or irregular surface. To stop, the scooter incorporates Hope V4 disc brakes With four front and rear pistons, as well as floating rotons so that the system does not warm more than the account in braking at high speed. And the result? This video surely speak by itself. Battery. A section that surely arches some eyebrow is that of autonomy. After all, a mamotreto like this moving at a tremendous speed surely endures little. According to the company, it is quite the opposite. It has a 1,800 WH battery, which translates into an autonomy of up to 240 kilometers. And for what? Needless to say, this scooter is not made for retail sale. It is a proof of concept, a demonstration of how far a single -person electrical mobility can go if technology is released. Putting a scooter 160 kilometers per hour is dangerous, even more on the street, so surely, to see it, we only see it in a circuit (where, everything is said, it has to be hilarious to pilot it). Bo the Turbo | Image: bo If someone wanted it, their price is $ 29,500, there are limited editions and is manufactured by order. Curious fact: The first unit will go to the house of a collector in Madrid. It will be there, precisely, the first units will be shown in the prelude to the Madrid Formula 1 Prize. However, it is not the fastest. Although the Bo The Turbo has brutal figures, the truth is that it is not the fastest electric scooter in the world. That title has, for now, The RM-X of precisely Rage Mechanics. This scooter has a power of 50,000W, reaches 173 km/Hy goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.5 seconds, always according to the brand. The fight against rapid scooters. These personal mobility devices They live a convulsive timeat least in our country, where they are increasingly limited. Not only can they not exceed 25 km/hbut they cannot go on the sidewalks and are prohibited from circulation in interurban roads, crossings, highways, highways or urban tunnels, the use of helmet, etc. is mandatory. As far as speed is concerned, it is no secret that there are methods to eliminate the limitations of some models. Without going any further, at the beginning of the year It was detected in Barcelona A trucado device that could move at 113 km/h. This can carry sanctions of up to 500 euros and the withdrawal of the vehicle. Cover image | Bo In Xataka | Mounting on a solar panel is possible: the electric scooter that works with solar energy arrives

If you also feel that you do not have so much time to read as you would like, there is a solution: the “fast reading”

by

I confess that Bill Gates gives me some healthy envy. Not just to have A current account which looks like a phone number with so many figures, but for its ability to Read more than 50 books a year. I have tried and it has been impossible for me. But Do not shoot the towel. Scientific evidence revealsthat there is a balance point between the speed of reading and the ability to understand and retention of the content that is being read. However, with adequate practice, that balance can be improved by accelerating the reading speed without compromising Reading understanding. Research Like those of the University of Guayaquil, they conclude that the reading speed can increase significantly with the practice and use of appropriate techniques. An average reader reads between 200 and 400 words per minute, while through rapid reading training, that speed can reach speeds of up to 1,000 or 1,700 words per minute. Strike a balance Fast reading is especially useful for processing long texts superficially, being useful for obtaining general ideas or punctual information. It is not recommended in contexts where a deep understanding, detailed analysis or memorization of the content is required, but when it comes to seeking specific information or in texts that address subjects of which previous knowledge is already had. The main ones involved in a slow reading speed are: Subvocalization: It is the habit of mentally pronouncing the words that are read. That limits the reading speed since the visual image of the word that interprets the brain is vocalized as if you are reading aloud, undergoing the need to vocalize each of the words and not limit itself to the compression of it. Word reading by word: The global understanding of the text decreases. Regression: reread several times or have to search in the next line of text as it breaks the reading flow. Low concentration: It affects both speed and retention. Quick Reading Techniques Science reveals that this speed increase is not a magical process, but the result of the conscious training of eye movements, vocabulary expansion and the use of strategies to improve global understanding, and not only the amount of words read per minute. 1. Fragmentation This technique is to avoid reading word by word and assimilating the Words by groups. For example, to start training, you can group the words of the phrases of two by two and increase the number progressively With practice. At first it may be a bit strange, but the brain recognizes the words for its morphology, which explains, for example, that you Cberreo Pdeue Read Etse Txeto. If you read it Word A Word would cost you more than in block because a word contextualizes its adjacent. This principle makes your view jump between words, not word in word during reading. The usual thing is to start reading like this:In-a-place-of-the-scan-of-whose-name-no-quiero-alleging But with a little practice, we soon start reading like this: ANDn a place-of the stain-of whose name-I do not want to remember With proper training, the number of “pauses” is reduced: In a place in the stain-of whose name I do not want to remember. 2. Use a visual guide The rupture of the reading flow is one of the most frequent causes for reading the reading. This usually happens when you have difficulty finding the following text line. The solution: as simple as using the finger to indicate the start of the next text line or an equivalent visual guide. On screens you can use the mouse pointer as a guide. If you prefer Read on mobiles or tablets, the edge the screen or any other reference can contribute to the view not to hesitate when looking for the next line and the reading inertia is maintained. 3. Be faster than voice If when you read you listen to the words in your brain, you are not reading quick enough. As we have said before, this phenomenon is known as subvocalization. To avoid this, it will be necessary to train the reading speed trying to read faster than that inner voice is able to vocalize. In doing so, it will be forcing the brain to prioritize visual processing instead of the “auditory” of your internal voice, thus improving the reading speed. 4. Infinite look Like any other muscle, ocular muscles should also be exercised to improve reading speed. One way to improve your performance is to practice infinity to get a visual sweep of the most efficient text. This technique consists in drawing the infinity symbol (∞) on the text block, so that the look runs in a more global way, not line by line, and improves the capture of words by blocks. In Xataka | The productivity books that have helped me the most: the recommendations of the Xataka editors Image | Unspash (Thought catog, Eliott Reyna)

China has broken the electric car deck with brutally fast recharges. So much that autonomy is already the least

by

When Jim Farley returned from China, several lessons were brought under his arm. Almost that it doesn’t matter when you read this because, with each visit to China of the Ford CEO, Farley always takes care of airing everything he has learned there. Among what has been learned, one day he questioned the real importance of the unacabable autonomies for an electric car. Taking into account that the battery size of an electric car remains a Too much spiny matter When lowering cars, Farley pointed out that his strategy for the future went through Manufacture small electric electric Because as soon as the price was put more battery. “If you have batteries like that, you can’t make money,” argued In reference to gigantic battery cars, the same ones that promise autonomies of many hundreds of kilometers and that, in the face of the future, promise to reach 1,000 kilometers between recharges. Farley has been a critical voice with those gigantic electric cars but is not the only one that has been expressed in those terms. Mazda, for example, made the same reflection Some time ago, focusing that large batteries raised the costs of the car … and its weight, a red line that the Japanese company has always tried to dodge. Although the approach was not exactly the same in the form (the Japanese study incorporating extended range versions With engines Combustion rotatingas they have done with the MX-30), in the background they did show that the bet should be another: contained autonomies but with systems that will stretch them in a simple way. Either with very fast recharges or, in the case of Mazda, with a small combustion engine that can save you at any time. In China they think something similar. While there are two clearly defined paths and one of them is committed to huge batteries, others are clear that they must get the fastest possible charges to offer an attractive electric car to the general public. Byd is one of them. But it is not the only one. More kilometers or faster When last week we attended the presentation of the Mazda 6eI felt that the press conference we attend with a bittersweet aftertaste and a more or less clear idea with everyone with whom I spoke. The completely electric Berlina, which Mazda has created with Changan, is sold with a 68.8 kWh battery or a second of 80 kWh. This last option seemed ideal for those who wanted Use your car to travel comfortably. If we suppose a consumption of 20 kWh/100 km, the first will not reach 350 kilometers between recharges and the second one would touch the 400 kilometers of a single sitting. However, the first battery can be loaded at a maximum of 165 kW of power, going from 10 to 80% in 24 minutes. The second, on the other hand, cannot do it at more than 90 kW, limiting that rapid recharge from 10 to 80% to 47 minutes. The general impression, so I talked to the fellow journalists, is that we would all sacrifice those 50 kilometers of autonomy if that would allow us to stop almost 25 minutes less when plugging the hose. Everyone seemed to us that a 90 kW recharge is not up to a car with aspirations to be an electric supervent. In ByD they have a similar impression and their bet is determined: Ultra -grape rechargesat the pace of filling a gas tank even if you have to stop once more. Although for now, They assured usits 1 MW recharge was mainly intended for heavy transport, they aspire to be an attractive solution for their own customers, with launches of more cars (right now they have two that admit this power) that can make use of these loaders. His approach is that the by and tang l can recover 400 kilometers of autonomy in five minutes. I would dare to say that the vast majority of drivers need or prefer to make a small stop before covering that distance. Huawei is one of them. The technological presented a few months ago A 1.5 MW recharge. Again, it is a very interesting formula for heavy transport but, to put it in perspective, a car with a large 100 kWh battery could be completely filled in five minutes if it did not have the obvious power restrictions so as not to be completely damaged. In spite of everything, if a manufacturer offers energy accumulators as resistant as those of Byd, filling a battery of this size should not take more than 10-15 minutes. Although Byd has filled headlines since he presented this load system, they are not the only ones. In April, Catl also presented a recharge system capable of overcoming that of the company of Stella Li, vice president of Byd than in Coach has defended these recharge systems against Autonomies of a thousand kilometers and said they aspire to bring them to Europe. In the interview he said that “they don’t give me more than 300 kilometers because I don’t want to pay the cost (of a greater battery).” Although I understand why Stella Li defends this approach, I also understand that Western manufacturers continue to prefer to offer much higher autonomies in order to sell as a purchase value. Perhaps 300 kilometers are fair but firmly believe that more than 350-400 kilometers of autonomy are needed in an electric car if the recharge network is powerful enough. I believe it with loaders of more than 150 kW, let’s not say with those plugs (and cars) that allow recharges at 1,000 kW. Despite this, There is something cultural In Stella Li’s words. You have to understand that China is a country so big that long trips They are usually done by plane or bullet train. The cities are so large that they favor adoption to the electric car because it is the environment where its virtues are more valued: without noise, without vibrations and … Read more

A garbage cube of 2,000 ago in Mallorca exposes the star product of Roman fast food: Zorzal’s skewer

by

The concept of “fast food“It is currently strongly associated with that of”junk food”. It usually involves a not very healthy dish due to the presence of processed foods. But fast food really exists For centuries And the Romans, of course, have something to say there. And a recent study puts on the table an important fast food industry in Roman times to northern Mallorca. The star dish? Singing birds. “Popina”Alejandro Valenzuela is a researcher at the Mediterranean Institute of Advanced Studies in Mallorca and the author of a Published article in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology in which he details how in the Roman city of Pollentiahe Zorzal He was the protagonist of street food. Founded in the 123 AC to the north of Mallorca, Pollentia was an imperial city for the empire due to its location in the Mediterranean and its ports that They favored trade With the island. Today is an archaeological site in which we have a curious and small theater, but in its day it must have been a very busy city, a bustling shopping center in which food played an essential role. Inside the shops, were the ‘Popinae‘. These are small establishments where you could eat something fast and have a wine before following the way. They were focused on the lowest classes of Roman society. Searching in the garbage. This was something common in Roman cities due to their rhythm of life. In Herculano and Pompeii you can see some ruins in good condition of Themopoliumwhich are more like taverns for somewhat more wealthy people, but basically, in both cases there was a bar with amphorae to get some hot food, serve the client and that it followed on their way. An example of Thermopolium Valenzuela, what interested him was to know what was in those mud vessels, but to discover what the inhabitants who were walking for Pollentia had to look in their garbage. Near one of those popinas there was a septic tank of a few meters deep in which everything was thrown. Part of the garbage was ceramic, which has allowed to date the date of use of the well between 10 AC and 30 AD What else was there? A large number of mammalian bones, birds and fish. And the bones of the birds are the ones that caught their attention. Pollentia location in Mallorca in image A. in B, the location of the well. In C, the meters at which a greater concentration of bones were found Fast Food Bird. Although there were several species, such as chicken, the bones were mostly slut. They are small singing birds associated with the diet of the upper classes of the Roman empirebut here we are in a very different context: popular food at street level. The remains highlighted the skulls and sternons of those birds, which indicated one thing: the most juicy parts should be the ones that served in the popina. As with other birds, the extremities and the upper part of the chest are the most juicy, and Valenzuela estimates that removing that juicy meat allowed the food seller to cook those parts quickly to the grill or in oil to serve it quickly. It is a meat that hardly takes a few seconds to cook. The darker, the more presence of parts they found in the black well. Within the red perimeter, the most fleshy parts and their associated bones, little present in the well Seasonal. There is also the possibility that customers sit down and consume the zorzal in dishes, since ceramic remains could indicate that there was a dishes, but due to the size of the bite, Alejandro Comment In Live Science that, within the “context of street food, it is also plausible to serve in skewer to facilitate consumption.” In the end, except exceptions, food in ancient times was linked to seasons and the foal is a seasonal product that would have integrated well into a diet like that of Roman cities with others like domestic chicken either European rabbittwo species whose remains would also have served in this restaurant Fast food of Pollentia. But the most important thing is that this finding makes the belief that the Zorzal was a luxury bite for the Romans staggers because the Popinae They were not precisely the premises that most frequented the High classes. Images | Daniele Florio From Rome, Dion art In Xataka | The world ranking of ultraprocess food: the countries that most and less consume it worldwide

If “Fast Walk” serves for yourself to lose weight

by

Is it possible to lose weight walking? It is a recurring question and is logical. After all, physical activity facilitates the consumption of calories that our body stores as fat. But it also turns out to be a form of Exercise available to almost everyonesomething important if we take into account that constancy is usually key when we talk about thinning. However, the answer to this question is somewhat more complex than it might seem. Yeah, walk It is a good way to burn calories, and much more: it is also an exercise that provides benefits to our cardiorespiratory and muscular health, and also helps prevent the appearance of diabetes, among other varied effects. That is why it is usually remembered from time to time that, although walking it can be very useful, it may not be the exercise that best suits our plans, and could be seen more as a complement that as the main resource to which we stick to. Now, let’s investigate why. As experts remember, exercise is not always the best strategy if what we are looking for is to reduce our body mass. “For weight loss, The diet seems to be more effective that physical activity “ Donald Hensrud explainsof the Healthy Life program of the Mayo Clinic. Rather, it is usually considered that, in general, the exercise is more effective when maintaining the weight; While if we want to lose weight, control our diet is usually considered a more effective strategy. Of course this does not mean that we should forget this part, even if only for The positive impact That an active life has in our health. The problem is that we tend to Overbear the impact of exercise and physical activity in general in the caloric consumption that our body performs. Alternatively, we can express it in a different way: we tend to underestimate (or directly to ignore) the enormous caloric consumption that our body performs only by being, to keep ourselves alive throughout our day to day. Some estimates place the relative weight of physical exercise Between 10% and 30% of caloric consumption. Imagine a situation in which physical exercise represents 20% of the calorie expenditure that our body performs. This implies that if we folded the exercise we do (100% more activity), we would only increase the caloric consumption of our body by 20%. Combine strategies Leaving weight loss in the hands of a simple strategy is not usually recommended. Constancy is important and use the Exercise as a complement To the diet when we want to lose weight, it can be helpful in various ways. First and perhaps more important, for being a healthy habit to incorporate in our day to day. Secondly, exercise can make changes in the diet more, “distributing” the effort we put to change towards healthier habits. Since constancy is important, a small help never hurts. Third, the exercise, we pointed out before, is a good way to keep us in our weight. The sooner we get the habit, the better. Walking can help us with these three purposes, so it is a perfect complement if we want to lose weight and want to do it in a healthier way. It is a good complement but is it the best? Walking has the advantage of helping us build Routines without great efforts and minimizing the risk of abandonment; But if what we want is to increase the caloric consumption of our body, for example to be able to resort to less strict diets, there are alternatives that perhaps better adapt to our needs. Finally, it is never worth remembering that each body is different, even our own body changes over the years. Formulas and weight losing recipes are not universal, so it is always useful (when not absolutely necessary) consult with experts who can guide us in the process. In Xataka | Do not tell me your age, tell me your grip strength: how simple gestures tell us how good we are aging Image | Arek In addition

How to deactivate the “fast edition” on Google photos when sharing files

by

Let’s explain How to deactivate the option of Quick edition that shows Google photos when you are going to share one. It is an option that allows you to improve that photo with artificial intelligence before sending it, a good way to optimize it, but sometimes it is too annoying. If you are not interested in this option and you prefer that this intermediate data does not appear when sharing your Google Photos files, There is a way to deactivate itand it is the one that we are going to explain briefly. You will be able to do it in the settings, so if you then change your mind you can reactivate it. Disable the fast edition in Google Photos To deactivate this option, you just have to click on your avatar up to the right, and in the options click on Photo settings to enter the application settings. The option will appear almost down at all. Once inside the app configuration, you have to click on Shared inside. When you access, you just have Disable the option Editwhich is the option that appears just below. When you do this, deactivating the tool will make Google photos stop showing the screen Quick edition Every time you choose the option to share a photo. This will make the process faster and more direct. 47 Android Applications Free and open source alternatives that respect your privacy to the fullest

I have tried Grok 3 and it is really intelligent and fast. The problem is that this is no longer enough

by

I’ve spent a few hours trying Grok 3the new version of Xai AI. I wanted to see their real abilities and especially how it behaves, what kind of results, in front of Chatgpt, Claude, Le chat, Deepseek… Reasoning and problem solving It stands out in mathematical problems. I made him complete the challenge Aime’24of which he was 6 of the 15 problems, for the 9 hits of OPENAI O3-mini-high. In addition, Grok 3 took a little less than five minutes, but O3-mini-High took almost six. Very striking to see their self -assessments until you find the correct answer (although sometimes it was not). A fragment of the steps that Grok 3 took to evaluate their own conclusions before presenting them as a final result. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. In basic reasoning tests, such as determining the number of repeated letters in somewhat complex words (the classic “lollapalooza”) or comparing decimals (9.11 vs 9.9), Grok 3 responds correctly after a few seconds of visible “thought”. O3-mini-High Be right after 6 seconds. Image: Xataka with chatgpt. Grok 3 also succeeded, but after more than four times longer. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. In a Greek mythology question about Jason’s maternal great-grandfather, Grok 3 found the correct answer in 18 seconds … while O3-mini-High needed 22 seconds to fail. Well played, Grok. O3-mini-High missed. Image: Xataka with chatgpt. Grok 3 instead gave a better built response, in addition to correct. And it takes less. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. Search and synthesis Its function Deepsearch is fast but sometimes it is not entirely precise and does not mention any important detail. I asked to analyze the impact of AI on chips design and, although it generated a text of 1,504 words with several quotes in just over a minute, omitted to mention important advances such as the framework ALPHACHIP from Google. In later and insistent attempts he did. I also asked for a full report on Xataka On financial, media, reputational level, etc. It was quite successful, although it showed an inherent limitation of any Deep Research system: He knows a lot about what is in public, but he doesn’t have many Insightsit lacks the expert criteria that knows not only the public, but what underlies. This is something of Grok and any other with Deep Research. When you ask for information about something you do not control, it is easy to assume that Deep Research (or in this case, Deepsearch) gives you everything. When you are in garlic it is easy to detect deficiencies. As in this example. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. The speed impresses: it is remarkably faster than Deep Research of OpenAi … but at the cost of sacrificing depth for speed. Of course, your selection of sources and appointments is usually really good. Unlike Gemini, it does not allow exporting reports directly to documents or customize the research approach. Again: Grok is very intelligent and capable, in his own way, but he lacks a product. Little llm is of little use if it forces to start from scratch and process all the information. Creativity and tone To try his creative writing I asked him for a story about a time traveler facing a paradox. The result was quite solid in construction of characters, details, descriptions and atmosphere, overcoming even the one that I consider the best in that aspect, Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Of course, some plot turns seem quite forced. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. His humor is basic and predictable, limited almost all the time to quite obvious words games. Teenage humor If the concept of disturbing valley You can move to a chatbot, Grok 3 is in that 99%: too fine to look like a caid robot, too predictable to finish convincing. It maintains political neutrality even on issues such as immigration or trans rights. Musk says it can be politically incorrectbut it seems that it is something that has more to do with what the user requires that a feature of his personality. That is to say: it can be taken out of correction, but only when the user pushes to it. Some limitations It does not allow customizing the behavior of the model, unlike chatgpt; or the response style, as Claude allows. It is limited to being a text drawer. You are only accompanied by the buttons to attach a file, activate your Deepsearch or activate your reasoning mode. That, and a few elementary instructions. No projects such as Claude or GPTS of Chatgpt, or the agents of Le Chat. In short: Nothing to retain pre -established contexts and guidelines or documentation to facilitate work. We always have to start from a new canvas. The interface is good, intuitive, simple … but they miss tools that make it more versatile and appetizing to integrate it into our day to day. It is powerful and capable for specific uses, but the product built around chatgpt, claude or le chat (projects, agents, previous instructions, etc.) make those alternatives something much more interesting for serious and recurring use. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. The security keeps are stricter than those of Grok 2. with that version We hallucinate for its lack of scruplesbut Grok 3 seems to recover them: he refused to generate a template for a mass fraud campaign by mail simulating that I am a Valencian prince in search of heiress. The generation of images does seem, again, more lax. Midjourney does not allow to create anything containing the words “Donald Trump” or “President of the United States”. Nothing. Grok 3 does not put so many objections. Not even with its owner. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. You can try Grok 3 from its official website or from Its integration into x (which is why you have seen two somewhat different interfaces in this article). It is temporarily free, but we already know that it will be one of the reasons to pay a subscription to X, and not the cheap. Its ability … Read more

give up fast money to win the war

by

Openai has chosen a conservative path to Operator: limit it to users of Chatgpt Prothose who pay 200 dollars a month. Only they can access this tool that automates tasks on the web. It is what OpenAi describes as a “prior research view”, and that lets us glimpse more an experiment than a finished product. Why is it important. The IA giant continues to prioritize product refinement over immediate income. 200 dollars a month per user capable of using operator are many dollars … but that is an important limit to its adoption in this phase. And it is deliberate. Between the lines. Openai has signed alliances with companies such as Dordash, Instacart, Priceline, Openable or Uber. That could suggest trade agreements to monetize operator on the side of the companies, but the OpenAi Coo, Brad Lightcap, has been blunt in the Wall Street Journal: There is no financial relationship in these collaborations. They are only optimizing the user experience to become more compatible with Operator. Therefore, the income that Operator now will come exclusively from Pro subscriptions. But that can change in the future: Openai has announced expansion plans to Users Plus, Team and Enterprise. He has also promised to release the API of Your Cua model (Computer-Useing agent) For developers. At the moment, there are no dates for either of those two promises. In perspective. Openai operates in a market with a giant potential. Analysts expect that The generative AI will move more than one billion dollars a year in less than a decade. However, Openai is betting on perfecting operator with a controlled implementation rather than maximizing short -term income. The bet. Initially limiting operator to its most committed and enthusiastic users (those who pay $ 200 per month), OpenAi seeks feedback quality. The one that is most capable of giving this type of user. In addition, errors are less expensive in this phase, and more valuable learning. This strategy suggests something: that the monetization plans with greater reach will come when the product is more mature. Deepen. Openai’s caution is striking because it contrasts with its aggressiveness on other fronts. For example, a few days ago we knew that it was also part of the Stargate projectvalued in half a billion dollars. Operator seems like an experimental strategic project, but not so much an immediate source of income. In Xataka | OpenAi prepares an AI with a doctoral level. He is so promising that he will first show it to the US government Outstanding image | OpenAI, Xataka with Mockuuuups Studio

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.