If “Fast Walk” serves for yourself to lose weight

Is it possible to lose weight walking? It is a recurring question and is logical. After all, physical activity facilitates the consumption of calories that our body stores as fat. But it also turns out to be a form of Exercise available to almost everyonesomething important if we take into account that constancy is usually key when we talk about thinning. However, the answer to this question is somewhat more complex than it might seem. Yeah, walk It is a good way to burn calories, and much more: it is also an exercise that provides benefits to our cardiorespiratory and muscular health, and also helps prevent the appearance of diabetes, among other varied effects. That is why it is usually remembered from time to time that, although walking it can be very useful, it may not be the exercise that best suits our plans, and could be seen more as a complement that as the main resource to which we stick to. Now, let’s investigate why. As experts remember, exercise is not always the best strategy if what we are looking for is to reduce our body mass. “For weight loss, The diet seems to be more effective that physical activity “ Donald Hensrud explainsof the Healthy Life program of the Mayo Clinic. Rather, it is usually considered that, in general, the exercise is more effective when maintaining the weight; While if we want to lose weight, control our diet is usually considered a more effective strategy. Of course this does not mean that we should forget this part, even if only for The positive impact That an active life has in our health. The problem is that we tend to Overbear the impact of exercise and physical activity in general in the caloric consumption that our body performs. Alternatively, we can express it in a different way: we tend to underestimate (or directly to ignore) the enormous caloric consumption that our body performs only by being, to keep ourselves alive throughout our day to day. Some estimates place the relative weight of physical exercise Between 10% and 30% of caloric consumption. Imagine a situation in which physical exercise represents 20% of the calorie expenditure that our body performs. This implies that if we folded the exercise we do (100% more activity), we would only increase the caloric consumption of our body by 20%. Combine strategies Leaving weight loss in the hands of a simple strategy is not usually recommended. Constancy is important and use the Exercise as a complement To the diet when we want to lose weight, it can be helpful in various ways. First and perhaps more important, for being a healthy habit to incorporate in our day to day. Secondly, exercise can make changes in the diet more, “distributing” the effort we put to change towards healthier habits. Since constancy is important, a small help never hurts. Third, the exercise, we pointed out before, is a good way to keep us in our weight. The sooner we get the habit, the better. Walking can help us with these three purposes, so it is a perfect complement if we want to lose weight and want to do it in a healthier way. It is a good complement but is it the best? Walking has the advantage of helping us build Routines without great efforts and minimizing the risk of abandonment; But if what we want is to increase the caloric consumption of our body, for example to be able to resort to less strict diets, there are alternatives that perhaps better adapt to our needs. Finally, it is never worth remembering that each body is different, even our own body changes over the years. Formulas and weight losing recipes are not universal, so it is always useful (when not absolutely necessary) consult with experts who can guide us in the process. In Xataka | Do not tell me your age, tell me your grip strength: how simple gestures tell us how good we are aging Image | Arek In addition

How to deactivate the “fast edition” on Google photos when sharing files

Let’s explain How to deactivate the option of Quick edition that shows Google photos when you are going to share one. It is an option that allows you to improve that photo with artificial intelligence before sending it, a good way to optimize it, but sometimes it is too annoying. If you are not interested in this option and you prefer that this intermediate data does not appear when sharing your Google Photos files, There is a way to deactivate itand it is the one that we are going to explain briefly. You will be able to do it in the settings, so if you then change your mind you can reactivate it. Disable the fast edition in Google Photos To deactivate this option, you just have to click on your avatar up to the right, and in the options click on Photo settings to enter the application settings. The option will appear almost down at all. Once inside the app configuration, you have to click on Shared inside. When you access, you just have Disable the option Editwhich is the option that appears just below. When you do this, deactivating the tool will make Google photos stop showing the screen Quick edition Every time you choose the option to share a photo. This will make the process faster and more direct. 47 Android Applications Free and open source alternatives that respect your privacy to the fullest

I have tried Grok 3 and it is really intelligent and fast. The problem is that this is no longer enough

I’ve spent a few hours trying Grok 3the new version of Xai AI. I wanted to see their real abilities and especially how it behaves, what kind of results, in front of Chatgpt, Claude, Le chat, Deepseek… Reasoning and problem solving It stands out in mathematical problems. I made him complete the challenge Aime’24of which he was 6 of the 15 problems, for the 9 hits of OPENAI O3-mini-high. In addition, Grok 3 took a little less than five minutes, but O3-mini-High took almost six. Very striking to see their self -assessments until you find the correct answer (although sometimes it was not). A fragment of the steps that Grok 3 took to evaluate their own conclusions before presenting them as a final result. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. In basic reasoning tests, such as determining the number of repeated letters in somewhat complex words (the classic “lollapalooza”) or comparing decimals (9.11 vs 9.9), Grok 3 responds correctly after a few seconds of visible “thought”. O3-mini-High Be right after 6 seconds. Image: Xataka with chatgpt. Grok 3 also succeeded, but after more than four times longer. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. In a Greek mythology question about Jason’s maternal great-grandfather, Grok 3 found the correct answer in 18 seconds … while O3-mini-High needed 22 seconds to fail. Well played, Grok. O3-mini-High missed. Image: Xataka with chatgpt. Grok 3 instead gave a better built response, in addition to correct. And it takes less. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. Search and synthesis Its function Deepsearch is fast but sometimes it is not entirely precise and does not mention any important detail. I asked to analyze the impact of AI on chips design and, although it generated a text of 1,504 words with several quotes in just over a minute, omitted to mention important advances such as the framework ALPHACHIP from Google. In later and insistent attempts he did. I also asked for a full report on Xataka On financial, media, reputational level, etc. It was quite successful, although it showed an inherent limitation of any Deep Research system: He knows a lot about what is in public, but he doesn’t have many Insightsit lacks the expert criteria that knows not only the public, but what underlies. This is something of Grok and any other with Deep Research. When you ask for information about something you do not control, it is easy to assume that Deep Research (or in this case, Deepsearch) gives you everything. When you are in garlic it is easy to detect deficiencies. As in this example. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. The speed impresses: it is remarkably faster than Deep Research of OpenAi … but at the cost of sacrificing depth for speed. Of course, your selection of sources and appointments is usually really good. Unlike Gemini, it does not allow exporting reports directly to documents or customize the research approach. Again: Grok is very intelligent and capable, in his own way, but he lacks a product. Little llm is of little use if it forces to start from scratch and process all the information. Creativity and tone To try his creative writing I asked him for a story about a time traveler facing a paradox. The result was quite solid in construction of characters, details, descriptions and atmosphere, overcoming even the one that I consider the best in that aspect, Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Of course, some plot turns seem quite forced. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. His humor is basic and predictable, limited almost all the time to quite obvious words games. Teenage humor If the concept of disturbing valley You can move to a chatbot, Grok 3 is in that 99%: too fine to look like a caid robot, too predictable to finish convincing. It maintains political neutrality even on issues such as immigration or trans rights. Musk says it can be politically incorrectbut it seems that it is something that has more to do with what the user requires that a feature of his personality. That is to say: it can be taken out of correction, but only when the user pushes to it. Some limitations It does not allow customizing the behavior of the model, unlike chatgpt; or the response style, as Claude allows. It is limited to being a text drawer. You are only accompanied by the buttons to attach a file, activate your Deepsearch or activate your reasoning mode. That, and a few elementary instructions. No projects such as Claude or GPTS of Chatgpt, or the agents of Le Chat. In short: Nothing to retain pre -established contexts and guidelines or documentation to facilitate work. We always have to start from a new canvas. The interface is good, intuitive, simple … but they miss tools that make it more versatile and appetizing to integrate it into our day to day. It is powerful and capable for specific uses, but the product built around chatgpt, claude or le chat (projects, agents, previous instructions, etc.) make those alternatives something much more interesting for serious and recurring use. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. The security keeps are stricter than those of Grok 2. with that version We hallucinate for its lack of scruplesbut Grok 3 seems to recover them: he refused to generate a template for a mass fraud campaign by mail simulating that I am a Valencian prince in search of heiress. The generation of images does seem, again, more lax. Midjourney does not allow to create anything containing the words “Donald Trump” or “President of the United States”. Nothing. Grok 3 does not put so many objections. Not even with its owner. Image: Xataka with Grok 3. You can try Grok 3 from its official website or from Its integration into x (which is why you have seen two somewhat different interfaces in this article). It is temporarily free, but we already know that it will be one of the reasons to pay a subscription to X, and not the cheap. Its ability … Read more

give up fast money to win the war

Openai has chosen a conservative path to Operator: limit it to users of Chatgpt Prothose who pay 200 dollars a month. Only they can access this tool that automates tasks on the web. It is what OpenAi describes as a “prior research view”, and that lets us glimpse more an experiment than a finished product. Why is it important. The IA giant continues to prioritize product refinement over immediate income. 200 dollars a month per user capable of using operator are many dollars … but that is an important limit to its adoption in this phase. And it is deliberate. Between the lines. Openai has signed alliances with companies such as Dordash, Instacart, Priceline, Openable or Uber. That could suggest trade agreements to monetize operator on the side of the companies, but the OpenAi Coo, Brad Lightcap, has been blunt in the Wall Street Journal: There is no financial relationship in these collaborations. They are only optimizing the user experience to become more compatible with Operator. Therefore, the income that Operator now will come exclusively from Pro subscriptions. But that can change in the future: Openai has announced expansion plans to Users Plus, Team and Enterprise. He has also promised to release the API of Your Cua model (Computer-Useing agent) For developers. At the moment, there are no dates for either of those two promises. In perspective. Openai operates in a market with a giant potential. Analysts expect that The generative AI will move more than one billion dollars a year in less than a decade. However, Openai is betting on perfecting operator with a controlled implementation rather than maximizing short -term income. The bet. Initially limiting operator to its most committed and enthusiastic users (those who pay $ 200 per month), OpenAi seeks feedback quality. The one that is most capable of giving this type of user. In addition, errors are less expensive in this phase, and more valuable learning. This strategy suggests something: that the monetization plans with greater reach will come when the product is more mature. Deepen. Openai’s caution is striking because it contrasts with its aggressiveness on other fronts. For example, a few days ago we knew that it was also part of the Stargate projectvalued in half a billion dollars. Operator seems like an experimental strategic project, but not so much an immediate source of income. In Xataka | OpenAi prepares an AI with a doctoral level. He is so promising that he will first show it to the US government Outstanding image | OpenAI, Xataka with Mockuuuups Studio

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.