We thought it took us a long time to learn to cook. Until some 780,000-year-old carp teeth rewrote history

If we think about the technology that has most transformed humanity, it is easy for the wheel, the steam engine or the microchip to come to mind in a more current way. However, there is a much older and more fundamental “technology” that literally changed our anatomy: the kitchen. The evolution. For decades, paleoanthropologists have debated At what exact moment did our ancestors stop consuming raw foods to start processing them through the control of fire. The most recent evidence not only rewrites our chronology, but confirms that mastering cooking was the true driving force of human evolution. How do you know? Date something as precise as the beginning of cooking, but the reality is that Until recently, indisputable evidence of the continued use of fire for cooking They were around 600,000 years old. However, a great finding published in the prestigious magazine Nature in 2022 set back this evolutionary clock. In this case it was at the site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqovin Israel, remains of large carp teeth were found. With these samples and through advanced techniques such as X-ray diffraction, the researchers demonstrated that these remains had been exposed to controlled and relatively low temperatures, being less than 500 °C. The first date. With this evidence it seemed quite clear that it was not an accidental fire, but rather that it was dated 780,000 years ago these animals began to be cooked. This is consistent with the fact that Acheulean hunter-gatherers were already exploiting aquatic habitats, selecting nutrient-rich fish and cooking them in what archaeologists call “ghost hearths,” which were structured fire zones. Another hypothesis. Although direct evidence pointed us back to 780,000 years ago, biological clues suggest that the culinary revolution began much earlier. This is what primatologist Richard Wrangham pointed out, in his book Catching Fire and in subsequent studies published in Current Anthropology, proposing that systematic cooking emerged with Homo erectus approximately 1.9 million years ago. Your arguments. To be able to give this date, this expert focuses mainly on energy efficiency, since he points out that cooking predigests food, breaking down fibers and starches. This allows you to obtain many more calories with minimal effort. But the most relevant thing is that by facilitating digestion, the Homo erectus It no longer needed a massive intestinal tract to process hard, raw vegetables. And here size matters, since intestinal tissue and brain tissue are energetically very expensive, and so, by shrinking the intestine, the excess energy could be redirected to the growth of a much larger and more complex brain. But this softer diet also explains why the molars of the Homo erectus They shrank and their jaws became less prominent. Beyond nutrition. The implementation of cooking not only brought anatomical benefits, but studies indicate that in the case of the first hominids, this was essential for roasting raw meat and killing the bacteria that were inside. But in addition, fire control and the ability to process food were key tools that facilitated human migration. In reassessments of classic sites, such as the Zhoukoudian caves in China, they confirm that the Homo erectus pekinensis used controlled fire to cook deer meat in specific stratademonstrating that this practice was essential for adapting to colder climates outside of Africa. Images | Michael Lock

The question is not whether Tim Cook will soon stop being CEO of Apple, but who will succeed him: Crossover 1×30

The end of an era is approaching, they say. Or maybe not. The rumors about Tim Cook’s potential “retirement” are contradictory, and if a few days ago the Financial Times spoke about He would retire early next year.yesterday new data they threw down that possibility. But here it happens that when the river sounds, it carries water, and this conversation does not come from now, but from months ago…or years. The current CEO of Apple came to this position in 2011, after the death of Steve Jobs, and since then he has turned the company into an absolute money-making machine. One that, yes, has disappointed with (theoretical) projects like Project Titan, with a Vision Pro that for the moment is still not taking off or with the surprising irrelevance in the AI ​​segment. That’s not the problem, of course. Although Apple has consolidated itself among the three companies with the largest market capitalization in the world in recent years, what it lacks is spark and the ability to innovate. Today Apple continues to depend heavily on the iPhone, although it is true that in recent years the services have given it a lot of joy. That makes it especially interesting to set up a pool with the main candidates to succeed Tim Cook, and that is what we have done in this new installment of Crossover, in which we debate Cook’s career, but also about who can take that baton. And many variables come into play here. From that operational strategy—will the new Apple be more innovative, or will it continue to focus on making money?—to the geopolitical implications of choosing a new CEO. Because let’s face it: This position is not just technologicalbut also political and diplomatic. There is a lot to cut through here, and it will certainly be interesting to see how the next few months go. On YouTube | Crossover In Xataka | Tim Cook has admitted that Apple is “very open” to acquisitions in AI. These are our candidates

Thus changes the most lucrative business of Tim Cook

The most profitable agreement in technological history has just changed its rules of the game. Google can continue paying Apple for being the predetermined search engine in Safaribut you can no longer shield that position with an exclusivity contract. Why is it important. Judge Amit Mehta has allowed Google to continue its payments to Apple and other distribution partnersbut with a fundamental condition: they will not be able to condition those payments to exclusivity. The company may pay to appear pre -installed, but it will not be able to prevent its competitors from doing the same. In figures. Google pays more than 26,000 million a year for these distribution agreements, with Apple as the main beneficiary. For Google, it is an investment that is worth it: about 40% of its searches in the United States arrive through Safari. And the agreement serves as a deterrent so that Apple does not throw its own search engine. For Apple, it represents practically pure income that are direct to your results account. New rules. Apple is now in a privileged position. You can keep Google as a predetermined option if you are still the one who pays best, but you can also offer that position to Microsoft with Bing, to Perplexity or even several search engines at the same time. It is the passage of a forced marriage to an open market. Smartphones manufacturers are free to preinstall or promote other search engines next to Google’s. Samsung could offer Bing as an outstanding alternative. Mozilla could diversify his options in Firefox. Between the lines. The judge’s decision speaks of a concern for the future rather than for the past. Mehta repeatedly mentions the boom of the generative AI and how Chatgpt The competitive panorama has changed. He did not want to intervene too much in a market that is being “rapidly transformed” by new actors. This caution has saved Google from a greater evil. Justice asked for the forced sale of Chrome and much more severe restrictions. The judge considered that it would be “very complicated and risky”. The market has celebrated the decision with 8% increases in Google and 4% in Apple. Turning point. This failure marks the beginning of a new era in the distribution of search engines. Apple can now experiment with hybrid models: Google for general searches. PERPLEXITY FOR IA Consultations. Specialized search engines for concrete niches. Or simply stay with who pays more at all times. The threat. For Google, the risk is not only to lose exclusivity but also face a permanent auction. If Microsoft decides to bet strongly to conquer safari, the costs could shoot. And if Apple decides to diversify options, Google would lose control over an important part of its traffic. The true winner of this sentence is not Google, who has dodged fragmentation but loses his fort. It is Apple, who maintains its huge income and earns the freedom to choose the best bidder at all times. Tim Cook has just seen how his most lucrative business becomes even more valuable. In Xataka | Browsers prepare for the most radical transformation in their history. One in which the IA will be Outstanding image | Solen Feyissa

How to get recipe ideas and what to cook using artificial intelligence

Let’s explain How to get recipe ideas using artificial intelligence. This will offer you different ways to get ideas and recipes to know what you can cook, both asking for something concrete that you want to prepare how to do it based on what you already have in the fridge, or preparing weekly menus. For most cases we will use the tools of the common and known by all, such as Chatgptalthough you can also use COPILOT, Deepseek, Gemini or similar. For these tools we will give you different ideas to use them When asking for ideas and recipes. But in addition, in the end we will also include some other applications that may interest you. Before starting, things to take into account Before putting artificial intelligence to help you with your recipes, it is important to take into account some things. First of all, You must know your food restrictions or those of those people for whom you are going to know. You must know the allergies, intolerances or their specific diets, and then try to use tools that take this into account, or specify it to the AI with which you are going to make the recipes. It is also important know what ingredients and kitchen utensils you have at home. There are some functions that will help you with the issue of ingredients and that we are going to tell you, but in general it is important to have an idea of what you have and what does not. The same goes for kitchen utensils. It is also important have your goals in mind. By this I mean you think if you want a quick recipe, one with few ingredients, or something more elaborate. These are things that you will have to specify when you then do the requests to artificial intelligence. And two more tips to finish. First, Do not trust the recipes that gives you AI, especially in terms of quantities and others. The more complex they are, the more possibilities there are errors. But on the other hand you should also have an open and flexible mind, since it may make creative suggestions or suggest uncommon ingredients. Ask for a specific recipe The easiest way to use AI to get ideas about what to cook is Ask for a specific recipesomething that you want to cook. You can take advantage to use a prompt in which, in addition to specifying what you want to do, you ask you to make an ingredient list and a step by step. For example, you can ask for something like this: I want to cook (the dish you want), tell me the best recipe and its step by step, and also give me a list of the necessary ingredients. With something so simple, chatgpt or the AI you have selected will become a kitchen book. First he will tell you the ingredients and quantities, and then he will indicate step by step all the elaborations. Ask for ideas by type of food Sometimes the problem is that you don’t know what you want to eat specifically, but you can ask for ideas for the type of dish you want try to prepare. Here, as we have told you in the previous advice, it is important that at least you can give it a few indications, and the more they are the more it can be right. For example, you can say: I need ideas for dinner. Tell me things that can prepare that they are fast, fresh, healthy and that you do not need too many ingredients. As you can see, in our request we have used four terms to describe what we want, and with that it has already given us several ideas such as chickpea salad, zucchini tortilla, and so on. You can use this same formula but changing the terms for others that adapt to what you want. Write ingredients and ask for ideas The next level when asking for ideas and recipes is tell the AI what ingredients you have availableeither in the fridge or in the pantry, so that the recommendation you receive is based on them. You can use a prompt like this: In the fridge I have eggs, tomatoes, potatoes, lettuce and a little chicken. Tell me fast that can prepare for dinner. Only with that, the AI will suggest several different dishes that you can prepare. In each one it will tell you the necessary ingredients and will take the steps of the preparation, including the times. You can get two or three fast ideas with this method, and almost all AI as chatgpt can serve you. Teach him what you have in the fridge Both Chatgpt and Gemini and some other artificial intelligence bots have photo recognition. This allows you Upload a photo of your fridge in which you see what you have, and then ask you to ideas about what you can cook with what is there. This is what I have in the fridge. Give me ideas of dinner dishes that can cook with it. If you put this prompt and also attach a photo, the first will identify the ingredients you have, and then it will make you several suggestions about cooking things based on what he sees in it. You can make corrections, or say “I also have ham”, or mention another ingredient you have and do not look good to receive new suggestions. Artificial intelligence can also help you Plan your week with weekly menus. You will even be able to make AI make a purchase list with all the ingredients you need for all dishes. A starting point could be this: I need you to make me a weekly menu, with breakfast, food and dinner. That is a balanced and healthy menu, where the Mediterranean diet prevails. Also make me a list of ingredients necessary to make the weekly purchase. Here, as we have told you, You can specify all kinds of … Read more

Musk, Gates, Zuckerberg and Altman believe that our mobiles have the days counted. Tim cook doesn’t have it so clear

Substitute is sought for the mobile phone. We have been looking for it for years, but it is that smartphones continue to prove to be perfect products in almost all the scenarios. However, several great technological leaders They seem clear that the mobile has an expiration dateand the AI ​​and a potential change in the way we interact with technology have the fault. Elon Musk and Neuralink. The tycoon has been trying to win the AI ​​career for some time With his startup XAI And his Grok model, but also has another startup that will end up being the one that makes the mobile disappear. It is neither more nor less than Neuralinkwhose implants could become an extraordinary option to communicate with technological devices. Bill Gates and the tattoos. The Microsoft co -founder converted to Philanthropist has already advanced in 2022 that one of the potential substitutes (or rather, accessories, at least in this case) of mobiles They are electronic tattoos. He himself ended up investing in a startup called Chaotic Moon —What was acquired by Accenture in 2015 – that combines aesthetics and biotechnology. The orientation of these tattoos is for the health moment, but it could be used for other uses. Mark Zuckerberg and glasses. Much more plausible looks like Meta and Mark Zuckerberg, than with their Ray-Ban Meta connected glasses It proposes an increasingly promising alternative to the mobile. Maybe not for everything, of course, but every time for more things. These devices can win many integers thanks to artificial intelligence, and in fact we saw how their evolution, the Project Orionit does raise a future in which perhaps the mobile is much less relevant. He already said it: His prediction is that In 2030 we will not get so much the pocket smartphone Thanks to connected glasses. Sam Altman and the AI ​​iPhone. Meanwhile, the OpenAi CEO, Sam Altman, also seems to be clear that hardware can end up being the perfect substitute for our mobile devices. We still do not know what type of device is raising, but it has joined the famous Jony Ive who for years was the head of Industrial Design in Apple. Together they have the objective of Create the “AI iPhone”. Tim Cook continues to believe on the mobile. Faced with all of them, Tim Cook believes that mobile phones still have a long way ahead. In the presentation of results of the first fiscal quarter of 2015, the Apple CEO highlighted its optimism about the future of mobiles When saying “I think there is still a lot of innovation in smartphones.” Its pro vision are for example a product that is not raised to be used outdoors, but they seem to have a rival for the finish line in study through the Project Atlas. Hardware with AI has been a failure. The truth is that a year ago the fever of devices with AI seemed to promise a turning point. However both the Humane Ai Pin like him Rabbit R1 They ended up being two great technological fiascos. None met expectations, and today both products are practically missing from the map. The optimism of Musk, Gates, Zuckerberg or Altman is striking, but today the mobile seems to continue having rope for (much) time. Image | Xataka with Grok In Xataka | Rabbit R1 and the Humane Ai Pin are too green. It turns out that we already have the best AI device in the pocket

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.