chatgpt

Millions of people are interested again in Chatgpt. The problem is that he has achieved it by violating copyright

by

Networks had long since They didn’t go so crazy with an artificial intelligence tool. Normally there is a certain bustle when something attracts more attention to the account, but what has happened with the generation of chatgpt images based on GPT-4O It does not make any meaning. The generative AI has achieved something that had not achieved: surprise the user on foot. And he has done so shows one of the greatest criticisms of this technology: the violation of copyright. Content ©. In recent hours, social networks have been filled with memes, images and avatars edited by ChatgPT for look like Studio Ghibli drawings. The images are really spectacular, to César what is from Caesar, but it is not convenient to forget that an AI knows how to generate an image of a horse because, among other things, it has been trained with millions and millions of images of horses. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Otherwise. If an AI like chatgpt-4o is capable of converting or generating an image With the style of a specific author It is because it knows what the concrete author’s style is like. That is, ChatGPT-4O must have been trained with related content, based or generated by the study founded by Hayao Miyazaki. And what about that content? Which is beautiful, emotional and close, but not free or public domain. It is contained in copyright, an issue that has brought to ChatgPT and head OpenAi since its inception. It is no secret. Of course not. Chatgpt was trained with a huge amount of data obtained from the Internet, websites, books, publications in social networks, academic articles, etc. Content that can be freely accessible, but not for that reason. An image that is “on the Internet” is not “on the Internet”, is housed on a server that can belong to a company and can have (and surely) copyright. That you can see and download it for free to your mobile to use the wallpaper does not mean that you can print it and sell it or illustrate the cover of your next novel with it. Click on the image to go to Tweet. “Live artists”. Openai claims to have opted for a “conservative approach” for the images that use the work of other artists and have “added a denial that is activated when a user tries to generate an image with the style of a living artist.” Like Miyazaki, for example. Before the flood of images generated with the style of the Japanese cartoonist, a company spokesman has told Business Insider that Openai will prevent “generations with the style of individual individual artists”, but will allow “broader studies styles.” In other words, Hayao Miyazaki no style, Studio Ghibli style yes. Which has its ironic point, because in the year 2016after seeing a demo of an animation generated by AI, the teacher Miyazaki said “I would never want to incorporate this technology into my work. I firmly believe that it is an insult to life itself.” My neighbor Totoro | Image: Studio Ghibli The style. It should be noted that no one can prevent someone from doing works with the style of Miyazaki or Studio Ghibli. The style is not protected per se. Another story, and is where the quid of the matter is, is to use protected works to train an AI capable of replicating that style. That is the real problem. We could understand it as the fan art: You can make an illustration of Pikachu, print it and put it in your room, no problem. What you can’t do is sell that illustration. OpenAi’s headache. This access and use of copyright content for commercial purposes has earned Openai some other complaintbeing the most important that of New York Times. Getty also denounced Stable Diffusion for having used their images to train models, Anthropic was denounced By a group of authors for having used their books to train Claude and a goal, apparently, downloaded 81.7 TB of books With copyright to train your models. The conclusion is clear and we have addressed it on occasion: The price to be paid for having artificial intelligence is the looting of all the contents on the Internet, beyond that AI companies They support and hide in the Fair Use. With generative artificial intelligence it seems to have assumed that if it is on the Internet it is free, and the reality is that it is not always. All large AI companies have ignored Copyright laws And, for the moment, there is no consequences. The debate, however, is far from finishing and probably this is not the last time it is put on the table. Cover image | @MDURBAR In Xataka | The generative AI has a huge problem with the content without a license to train. Adobe is trying to solve it

Españita is using the latest chatgpt novelty for the only possible

by

A few years ago, before the boom of Chatgpt and that the big technological ones were launched to The artificial intelligence career (AI), Hayao Miyazaki, Mangaka and heavyweight in the history of anime, confessed What seemed the animations with this new technique: bad. Fatal. Worse. “I would never want to incorporate this technology into my work in any way. I firmly believe that this is an insult to life itself,” Miyazaki confessed After they showed him a video generated with the in which a creature could be seen crawling. They are major words taking into account that Japanese is one of the founders of Studio Ghibli and made possible works such as ‘My neighbor Totoro’. The time (and internet) have played a bad pass to Miyazaki. If you give yourself A Tour of Networksespecially by X, you are likely to find yourself with a good (and growing) handful of anime -style images to which Miyazaki would have a divided heart: by aesthetics they would not disregard a work by Studio Ghibli, but they are not creations of any study, but of AI. In addition, much of its content does not seem to fit a priori in an epic movie. People have discovered that there are what can generate anime versions of iconic moments of history. And at least in the case of Spain he has done something unexpected?: Playing moments and chanante characters in homeland, since Jesús Gil in his jacuzzi To Míchel palpating the testicles of the kid Valderrama In the Bernabéu or Fraga giving a bath in Palomares. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Click on the image to go to Tweet. The last viral challenge that is spreading through the Elon Musk network and that leaves a few examples is to take iconic images of the story, ask an AI to recreate them as if they were illustrations of a manga comic or parts of an anime movie and then upload them next to a brief message, such as “In The Coming Days, People Are Going to Anime Every iconic photo In History “. The viral challenge has started after Chatgpt Update The GPT-4O multimodal model with a native image generator that facilitates among other things to edit historical photos. There are those who are using it for the challenge. And who opts for other tools, such as Grok. In any case, they attract attention for more than their style, worthy of a manga comic. Beyond the form is the background. Many of the images that are being shared, especially elaborated by creators from outside Spain, respond to Historical moments especially sensitive, like The murder by John F. Kennedy of 1963, the attack of the Twin Towers or Protests in Tianamen Square of 1989. iconic facts. With a quick search are also recreations of other episodes and relevant characters, such as Hitler’s visit to Paris, Napoleon Bonaparte in The popular portrait On horseback that Jacques-Louis David, the Soviet flag Honding at the Reichstag or even the attack that Trump suffered in July. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Click on the image to go to Tweet. Click on the image to go to Tweet. In Spain, AI has also been used to reproduce key moments of Last decadessuch as 23F (with Tejero in Congress), the attack by Carrero Blanco or La Fabricida declaration of independence Catalan of 2017. However the viral challenge has served here For something else: pull a sneer and recreate episodes, memes or chanantes (or even casposing) characters as if they had just left the study of Miyakazi and are part of an anime. What does that translate? In an extensive list of illustrations that show from the episode of Míchel and the kid Valderrama in the Bernabéu to Fraga in full soaking in PalomaresJesús Gil put in a jacuzzi surrounded by girls in Biquini, Karlos Arguiñano in the kitchen or the Fuentecerrada child speaking from your pool. The list adds and continues and leaves a curious sensation: the story (both sober and that formed by memes and chanantes characters) looks different through anime. Images | X In Xataka | Tiktok is a field of turnip, its AI has a blind spot and is not detecting the photopollas

How to edit your photos with chatgpt to put them anime style or what you want

by

Let’s explain How to edit your images with chatgpt To reimagine them with the style you want. For example, you can make your cat’s photo have the style of the Ghibli studio, or anyone you want. It is a new option that has reached payment subscribers. This editing option will completely reimagine the photo. This means that faces can change, and positions too. You will simply use your photo as inspiration. In addition, free users have the limit of Chatgpt to be able to upload a limited number of photos to interact with them. We are going to indicate how to do this step by step with the Chatgpt web version. However, you can follow the same steps with your mobile or desktop applications. Edit your photos with chatgpt The first thing you have to do is Load the photo you want in the chat of chatgpt. For that, click on the Load files With the sign of the +, and choose the photo you want from your gallery or a folder of your device. Now, you have to Write a prompt telling you to reimagine the photo. You have to do it before sending the photo, when you are loaded and see it, then write the prompt including the style in which you are going to love it. For example, you can put something like “reimagine this photo in anime style.” When you send the image with the Prompt, Chatgpt will stay analyzing the content of the photo, and will create from scratch a new photo in which it is represented what you have in which you have sent, but with the style you have asked. This may take a few seconds. After seeing the result, you can continue asking you to reimagine the same photo in different ways. You can try concrete studies styles such as Ghibli or Pixar, or even more different ones. In Xataka Basics | How to use chatgpt or gemini by taking out the information only from Wikipedia as the only source

The O1-PRO model of Chatgpt Pro is 140 times more expensive than the Chatgpt O3-mini. What is not clear is that it is much better

by

Paying $ 20 per month for accessing Chatgpt Plus did not seem too serious. The thing began to get interesting when Openai launched its chatgpt pro subscription at 200 dollars a month. But now there is an even more expensive version of these models, and this again shows that we are at the beginning of a worrying slope: that of AI prices. What happened. OpenAI He has just announced That O1-Pro, the most powerful version of its reasoning model, is now available through its API. Until now it was only possible to enjoy it in a limited way through the subscription to Chatgpt Pro, but now the developers can also create services with it. The striking is not really that the company offers this version, but the price at which it is available. 140 times more expensive than O3-mini. As we said, O1-Pro is only limited to Chatgpt Pro users. If someone wants to use it intensively through the API, prices They are really high: O3-mini O1 O1-PRO Price for 1m tokens input (dollars) 1.10 15 150 Price for 1m tokens output (dollars) 4.40 60 600 As can be seen, O1-Pro is 10 times more expensive than O1, and about 135 times more expensive than O3-mini, which is the version of the reasoning model that for example we can use (limitedly) in the free version of Chatgpt. Gold Price Tokens. That cost imposes an important barrier for those who want to use this AI model for projects in which we introduce a lot of text and want to obtain a lot of text. For example, if we want to analyze a lot of documents and We saturate The input context window (200,000 tokens) and the output (100,000 tokens), we will have a cost of $ 90 … for a single question and an answer (an API request). But is it really so good? Preliminary O1-Pro impressions in Chatgpt Pro They were not especially striking according to whom They have tried italso They have protested for one falling quality. According to Openai O1-PRO, it offers “responses that are better consistently”, and highlight that it is an O1 version that uses more calculation power to “think more and offer even better responses to the most complex problems.” For asking not to be. IA companies are losing a money training their models, but they hope to recover it with a simple technique: increasingly faces. Data leaked in The Information also pointed out how Openai were already raising how an AI agent could replace a “human doctorate” to investigate, the cost would be $ 20,000 per month. They seem faces, but maybe they don’t. Of course, the price of these subscriptions and these accesses to the API may seem expensive, but they can also be a true bargain. What matters here is the profitability that we can get out of these models of AI: if they help us generate many more income, we will end up having “robotic employees” who work 24 hours a day, seven days a week and also do so with a productivity and quality of theoretically extraordinary work. But of course, we will first have to use them like this … and ensure that these results are effectively valid, something that for now does not seem so clear. In Xataka | AI agents are promising. But as in Tesla’s FSD, you better not take your hands from the steering wheel

How to use chatgpt or gemini by taking out the information only from Wikipedia as the only source

by

Let’s explain the way you can do Chatgpt consultations using Wikipedia as the only source. Sometimes, when you ask for a thing to artificial intelligence you can make mistakes, and even when you want me to explain something obtaining internet information, you can use unreliable sources to generate the answer. Meanwhile, Wikipedia has been positioned for many years A great source of collective knowledge. Yes, it also has errors, but there are much less. Therefore, we are going to tell you and explain the prompt that you can use both in Chatgpt as in COPILOT, Deepseek either Gemini. Ask the AI ​​to use wikipedia What we want to get is that the artificial intelligence chat we use use wikipedia as the only source to obtain information. In this way, you will look for what you have asked there, you will get written information, and generate an answer based on it. We can meet two problems. The first is that in addition to Wikipedia also use other sources, so that everything will no longer come from a single site. It may also happen that the answer is too technical. We will solve both things with the prompt. This is the prompt that we recommend: Explain to me in a simple way what is XXXX taking the information only from Wikipedia. Here, what you have to do is change the XXXX for what you want me to explain. You can also ask you to explain who a person is, or adapt it in the way you need for the request you have in mind. What we have done in this prompt is to add the “in a simple way” so that the answer it generates is colloquial. Besides, We have added the term only To specify that only use Wikipedia as a source, and that you do not obtain data from any other web page. In Xataka Basics | How to improve chatgpt responses: 9 steps to guarantee higher quality and better sources

Chatgpt costs $ 700,000 a day, Deepseek just 83,000. A key is huawei and play cards differently

by

2025 began with a tsunami in the segment of the artificial intelligence. After months and months talking about different models and companies such as Google, Microsoft, Apple, Goal And, of course, OpenAIa Chinese company took off the manga Deekseekan AI that shook industry foundations. Beyond its possibilities or how good it worked, which stirred the waters were economic and hardware issues. Almost from the beginning the question of How China had taken out an AI like Deepseek With the hardware limitation they have due to the Commercial War with the United States and the impossibility of buying the most powerful graphs of Nvidia (although with controversy). To do this, the company defended that it had to pull ingenuity Thanks to an infrastructure of NVIDIA H800 chips and a training of more than 2,788 million hours with a ridiculous cost: 5.6 million dollars. And it seems scarce because Openai He invested about 100 million dollars to train GPT-4. Another melon is what it costs to keep it. As noted ReutersIf Chatgpt costs about $ 700,000 a day, Deepseek drops to $ 87,000. And here some things that have to be taken into account. Deepseek is 10 times cheaper to maintain than chatgpt, according to Depseek Last Saturday, and as noted ReutersDeepseek revealed some data on costs and income related to its V3 and R1 models. The first is a traditional, more conversational chatbot, resulting ideal for the writing and creation of content. R1, however, is a reasoning model. It stands out solving problems, using logic and is able to show step by step reasoning, using continuous learning. To compare with better known models, Depseek V3 would be like GPT-4 and R1 something similar to OPENAI O1. In the report, Reuters highlights that the theoretical relationship of Deepseek-benefit costs is up to 545% per day. Of course, the company itself warns that real income is significantly lower, but another pearl they have left since Deepseek is the cost of maintenance. Keep chatgpt working costs about $ 700,000 a day to OpenAI (at least two years ago). The reason is that the infrastructure of Microsoft Azure Serversit has a considerable energy cost, you have to pay wages and, obviously, all the power in hardware to process the consultations you receive every second. In yellow, the costs. In blue, theoretical income Deepseek “only” 87,072, a ridiculous price compared. A few days ago affirmed That, renting the H800 costs less than two dollars per hour and the estimated theoretical income is just over 560,000 dollars, which would add more than 200 million dollars in a year. In the upper graph, Depseek shows the cost of maintaining R1 and theoretical income thanks to the tokens that are generated, whose price depends on the moment of the day, being cheaper at night. They also clarify that Deepseek V3 is “significantly cheaper.” This opens more issues. One is how it is so cheap because training an AI, of course, is not. Ignoring the accusation of theft by OpenAIif Deepseek has not deflated the numbers, puts on the table a situation in which it is not needed so many graphic power to train an artificial intelligence. Here the key is the ‘reinforcement learning’, the way Deepseek has found do with much lessbut it should also be noted that, although during training the Nvidia chips are used for the R1 model, in the inference it is using The Ascend 910b of Huawei. Huawei chips are cheaper And, supposedly, more efficient, and this decision of Deepseek is almost more relevant than what may cost to maintain the system. The reason is that you can teach the rest of artificial intelligence companies that, perhaps, It is not worth using the latest generation GPUs For everything, but only for training that occurs sometimes counted, before the implementation of AI, and then use other more efficient and cheap GPUs for inference. This inference is what is done later, in a use that we could call “real” The training would be the equivalent of swallowing technical manuals in a five -year career and the inference such as implementing that knowledge and reasoning starting from the base you have and without having to learn them again. In the end, the controversy of five million dollars Deepseek is going to be there for a while, especially when we compare with OpenAi numbers, but it is clear that Depseek is doing things from another approach and can be a good mirror for companies that come behind. And, with one China very focused on the development of both AI as of Hardware for AIit can be the perfect ‘spearhead’ model. Images | Github (Deepseek), Xataka In Xataka | Deepseek has created another Milmillonaria fortune: Liang Wenfeng has become popular but its wealth is still a mystery

Meta had no own app to compete with chatgpt. Mark Zuckerberg has already warned that this will change very soon

by

Goal is in a strange situation in the AI ​​segment. His Open Source model, calls, is something like the Linux of the AI. From it all kinds of derived developments arise, but while the company triumphs among independent academics and developers, it barely has a presence in the commercial world. And precisely that can change soon. Meta AI Independent APP in sight. According to sources close to the aforementioned project In CNBCGoal is preparing the launch of an independent AI application during the second quarter of 2025. Goal AI is an unknown veteran. The company launched its chatbot Goal AI In September 2023, a year and a half ago. However, the company preferred Integrate it into your social networks ” It was a curious movement, but it has caused it to be a great stranger. Susan Li, CFO of Meta, indicated that Meta AI has about 700 million monthly active users (at least they have opened it once a month). Goal needs its own chatgpt. And as a goal did not offer independent chatbot – it can be webbut not in the EU – the rivals have advanced him everywhere. Chatgpt has always been the referent, but Gemini, Claude, Deepseek or Co -People are now the clear options for those who want to access these tools. All of them offer independent applications on the mobile. Even perplexity does it. Here we have A good example in perplexitywhich is not only a search engine with AI but has become a way of accessing several AI models – Open Source – from the same interface. Goal can take advantage of that same approach since its own LLM is Open Source, but a goal AI has always focused on a flame exclusively. Zuck already warned. The Meta CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, stood out in his talk with investors in January his ambition in this area: “This is going to be the year in which a personalized assistant of high intelligence reaches more than 1,000 million people, and I hope that ai is that assistant of AI.” Did it twice. Not only said that to investors. On January 10 he answered a user who He suggested in Threads What a goal AI had its own independent application. Mark Zuckerberg’s response was an emoticon that represented that he agreed 100% with that suggestion. Subscription model in sight. In CNBC they reveal that Meta plans to collect a subscription for using Metaai, thus imitating the philosophy they have followed for example OpenAi, Google or Microsoft. The idea, as in those cases, is to offer a basic version without cost, and then more powerful, but paid versions. Image | Goal In Xataka | Mark Zuckerberg announces the new goal goal: to create a general artificial intelligence

How to use chatgpt as a predetermined search engine in Chrome

by

Let’s explain How to use chatgpt as a predetermined search engine In Chrome, something that will also serve you for Edge and any other chromium -based browser that can install its extensions. With this, instead of using Google or some of Your alternativeswhat you look for in the address bar will ask Chatgpt. Setting this is quite simple, just install an extension and make a change in the configuration. But we are going to guide you step by step through the process so that no one is lost along the way. Chatgpt as a chrome search engine The first thing you have to do is download in chrome the extension Chatgpt Search. For this, Enter this linkwhich is the one that leads you to the extension of the Chrome Web Store. Once inside the extension file, click on Add to Chrome. You can also install this in browsers compatible with Chrome extensions. When you press on the install button, a confirmation message will appear. In this message you will tell you the permits that you have to give to the extension. Click on the button Add extension To confirm and install this complement to your browser. The extension will modify the automatically predetermined search engine When installs. Even so, you can check it by entering the Chrome configuration, and clicking on the section Seeker. Here, Chatgpt Search should appear controlling the option. On this screen you can deactivate the option to use AI as a search engine whenever you want. Now, simply Write what you want to search in the address barand you’ll see that under what you write tells you that you will do it with chatgpt. When you press Introyou will look for what you have written in the search function of artificial intelligence. The first time you use chatgpt as a search engine A Chrome message will appear asking if you want to undo the change of the search engine, since it was done automatically. In this window, click on Keep To confirm to chatgpt. In Xataka Basics | How to improve chatgpt responses: 9 steps to guarantee higher quality and better sources

What is, news, differences, and how to access the new artificial intelligence model of ChatgPT

by

Let’s explain What is and what news brings GPT 4.5the new artificial intelligence model launched by OpenAI for Chatgpt. Two years after a GPT 3.5 that revolutionized the industry and the technological world, this transition model between GPT-4O and GPT-5 arrives. We are going to start this article explaining what GPT-4.5 is, in case you still don’t know what this type of technology is. Then, we will tell you the novelties that it brings and how it differs with ortho models. And then, we will tell you how you can access him and those who can do it. What is GPT-4.5 GPT-4.5 is the artificial intelligence model of GPT-4 successor. GPT models are the artificial intelligence engine under chatgpt, The technology that makes it work. Over time new versions are coming out, and each of them have improvements that then apply to Chatgpt. Therefore, you don’t change chatgpt, but you can choose between the different engines that make it work. Of course, some are free and others are paid, and some work in one way and others from another. In the case of GPT-4.5, It will be the last model without a chain of thought. Some alternatives such as GPT-4O They are able to reflect on your question and how to face the answer before answering. However, this new version does not, so it looks more like GPT-4 than to other later models. GPT-4.5 is The largest and most advanced language model Posted by Openai to date. Not only is it more natural, but it has A much higher knowledge base with which to be able to face more complex challenges in scientific disciplines. It also improves its ability to solve logical problems. But one thing you have to know is that we have a version of GPT-4 freefor now GPT-4.5 is going to be paidand only subscribers can use it. The logical thing would be to think that they later take out a “mini” version somewhat more limited to use free of charge, but for now there is no date for it. How is GPT-4.5 As we have advanced a little higher, GPT-4.5 continues to advance in the resolution of tasks, and thanks to having a greater knowledge base improves the responses of their predecessors in logical problems, and is able to answer better questions in scientific disciplines. In general, The less hallucin modeland it is more truthful in your answers, a logical improvement for each new version that is coming out. But one of its most differentiating characteristics is in Emotional intelligence. This model is able to detect the tone in which you write a message, and respond in a consistent way. For example, if you notice frustration in your message the answer will be calmer and diplomatic. In addition to this, shows more solidity in complicated questions whose answer is not clear. For example, if you ask what the language would tell you that Nolo knows, and will explain that scientists do not believe we know it because they were invented before written records. Then, it will give you a series of points about what is currently known. To get this, OpenAi has added New supervision techniques for the learning of your model, which bind to traditional methods such as the supervised fine adjustment (SFT) and learning by reinforcement based on human feedback (RLHF). In short, we have a model that will significantly improve the answersand also the tone with which it responds in the cases in which you write in an emotional way. How to access GPT-4.5 For the moment, GPT-4.5 is going to be a payment model. The first who can start using it are the subscribers of Chatgpt Prothe company’s 200 dollars plan. But from next week it will also begin to be available in the subscription Chatgpt plus of $ 20 and Team. For the moment Nothing has been said about a free version. Normally Openai always leaves their best models for those who pay, so it is logical to think that it will take a few months to launch a free version, and that it will have some type of limit when it arrives. In Xataka Basics | How to improve chatgpt responses: 9 steps to guarantee higher quality and better sources

launch an unlimited chatgpt and full of advertising

by

Google taught the world that extraordinary income could be achieved offering free products. During the last quarter of the century he has exploited conscientiously The famous “If you don’t pay for the product, you are the product.” He has offered fantastic services (Gmail, Maps, Search, YouTube) for free, but with a big condition: in them collect information and shows ads. Users have compensated us, and despite whom, despite the privacy included – most have ended falling into their nets. Many companies do the same and offer at least free or cheaper versions of their services if we accept that ads (Spotify, Netflix) are shown, but curiously the world of AI does not just adopt that model. In fact, OpenAI raises a classic freemium model: The free version of Chatgpt allows access to some of its functions, but only in a limited way. You can ask a certain number of questions a day and you will not have access to their experimental or more advanced models and functions (Operator) or, if you have it, it will be almost testimonial (Deep Research). To “unlock” those capabilities touches to pay, and Sometimes it’s time to pay a lot. Arriving before anyone with chatgpt and improving it constantly has worked. OpenAI already has 400 million weekly active users, a 33% increase on the figure they had just three months ago. Chatgpt has managed to be “the AI ​​of the town”, which is the same as Google with its search engine, but Google ended up deciding that to continue growing the ideal was to offer a free service for users but full of ads. The question is whether that will end up going with AI. The question is no longer so much if we will see intercalated ads in our conversations with the chatbots, but when we will see them. Some believe that is inevitable. Perplexity was one of the first to raise that possibilityand the question is no longer so much if we will see intercalated ads in our conversations with the chatbots, but when we will see them. That is precisely what Ben Thompson also states In Stratecherystating that OpenAi “has moved too slowly: At this point the company should have a version with advertising (…) Openai is very interested in offering free users the best models from the point of view of competition and being profitable, and that means advertising. “ That’s how it is. As happened with Google, offering a complete, free and advertisement product is the almost inevitable path for OpenAi (and for its competitors) because it is the form (perhaps the only one, as Thompson argues) to conquer the world and all those users who want Use those options, but without paying them. And there are many, as Google has demonstrated with its platforms. Thompson explains that offering a free version with advertisements “maximizes the market to which it can be directed, and at the same time allows continuously increasing user income.” But that does not mean that Openai You cannot or will not have premium subscriptionsand in fact like any other company in this sector, combining advertising with subscriptions is the clear model for consumer content companies. On another level, of course, there will be companies. Google offers subscriptions such as Google One (more aimed at individuals) and Google Workspace, more companies oriented. In it includes things such as business email accounts, storage, business support and special controls: it is a twist on its free services, but it is a return without advertising and very thought for companies. OpenAi could apply the same story. He is already doing it with his Pro, Teams and Enterprise plans, who are precisely aimed at those business environments and will continue to make sense. And yet They have a golden opportunity To conquer many more users. One that, we want it or not, is full of ads. We will see if they do. In Xataka | There are too many AI models. That raises a true death sentence for Anthropic and Claude

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.