I have tried the chat, the French Mistral chatbot, and has arguments to fight with Chatgpt. Not just for being faster

Mistral recently launched the mobile app and the new web version of Le Chat, his AI assistant that seeks a European approach (and with a French accent) for chatbots that are already something everyday in our lives. Incidentally, that launch has been accompanied by an important update of its web platform. As a regular user of Chatgpt and ClaudeI wanted to test it in several scenarios, also comparing it with its rivals. The first impression impacts: It is deviably fastmuch more than any model we have seen so far. Of course he has even more crumb. Speed ​​changes the rules The most striking is still your speed in responding. Reach 1,000 words per second thanks to Its integration with brain processors. This, in practice, means long virtually snapshot responses. Not that GPT-4O Or 3.5 Sonnet on duty are too slow, it is a first world problem, but I think we all prefer to wait a second to wait fifteen. In my tests comparing Le Chat with Chatgpt and Claude I have noticed that difference. For example, by asking them to write a long and complete analysis about the tariff policy of the United States, Le chat did it in a couple of seconds, with a well structured text and even with appointments. His rivals offered quite similar quality responses, but it took longer. And if we want to spin fine, Claude was the one who was above Chatgpt: his answers are usually better in pure writing (apart from code, for example), he has a somewhat more refined, natural and professional style, all at the same time. In fact That’s where chat loses against Claude: The most convincing style, more similar to that of a competent human, the Anthropic chatbot wins. Chatgpt maintains a good general balance, but here does not stand out in speed or style. It is also worth commenting on something: their answers are backed by consultations to reputed media and agencies such as AFP, his countryman, with whom he maintains a collaboration agreement. In my translation and content analysis tests, the model has shown to be at the height of Chatgpt and Claude in quality, although with a more concise style. A somewhat trivial example made me glimpse that Le chat seems somewhat more assertive than chatgpt or claude. Especially the first (and sometimes also the second) sin of being too influenced by the human who talks with them. The example that said: I asked him if Xataka was a Spanish soccer club, what would it be. His answer was Barcelona. He argued reasonably well, but I retended in an incisive way: “Why not Real Madrid? Xataka is the most read technology of Spain at a distance of the second, and Real Madrid is the Spanish club with more titles.” This was your answer. Colors out, I liked it to be reaffirmed and that it was not complacent with my re -question: The choice of FC Barcelona to compare with Xataka is based on several factors that go beyond the number of titles. Here are some reasons why I opted for Barcelona instead of Real Madrid: Style and philosophy: FC Barcelona is known for its distinctive game style, often associated with the “Tiki-Taka”, which is innovative and different. Xataka, being a technology blog, also stands out for its innovative approach and its ability to adapt to new technological trends. Identity and community: FC Barcelona has a strong Catalan identity and a very united community of followers. Xataka also has a community of very compromised and passionate readers by technology, which reinforces that sense of community. Adaptability and avant -garde: Although Real Madrid is a huge club with many titles, FC Barcelona has been historically known for its ability to adapt and be at the forefront in terms of play style and talent development. This aligns with how Xataka remains at the forefront of technology. Global recognition: Both Xataka and FC Barcelona have significant global recognition in their respective fields. Although Real Madrid is also globally recognized, the way in which FC Barcelona has built its unique brand and style resonates more with the identity of Xataka. These reasons do not imply that Real Madrid is less relevant, but simply highlight how certain aspects of FC Barcelona resonate more with Xataka’s identity and approach as a technology blog. By the way, when I asked who Real Madrid would be, he gave an argument argued in his prestige, global scope, awards, etc: The country. It sounded at least reasonable, but when, already restless, I asked who Valencia would be, he told me The world. Twisting the gesture, I asked him who was then Atlético de Madrid. Answer: “Public“. End of the test. Personalized agents and automation One of Le Chat’s most interesting characteristics is his agents system, which allows Create specialized attendees invoking them with “@”. This functionality, similar to OpenAI GPTS or Claude projects, but with a different approach, allows you to automate specific tasks and create personalized workflows. Yes indeed: As with GPTs and projects, this is a feature that requires a Pro subscriptionno free plans. Image: Xataka. Agents can be configured in two ways: through the visual interface of the plataforme or through the API for developers. The interesting thing is that you can customize aspects such as: The base model (Mistral Large 2Mistral Nemo or Codestral). The “temperature” or the tone of the answers (to make them more creative or more precise). Specific behavioral instructions. Examples of use to improve your performance. Unlike ChatGPT GPTS, which are more oriented to the end user, Le Chat agents seem to be designed also thinking about business integrations and automated workflows. While Claude does not yet offer similar functionality (although Claude Pro with extended context), Mistral approach seems to be halfway between the ease of use of chatgpt and flexibility They are looking for developers. In my experience, the creation of agents is more technical than with GPTS, but also more powerful in terms of customization and … Read more

It is no longer necessary to be registered to use chatgpt. And it is another step in OpenAi to be “the new Google”

OpenAI has eliminated the need to register to use the chatgpt web search, allowing any user to access their service directly. It is a movement that eliminates friction and democratizes access to its conversational search technology, which was already free. EITHER Freemium. If a few months ago OpenAi allowed the basic version of Chatgpt without registration, now this extends to Your own search engine. The context. This step is part of a broader strategy that we already anticipate: OpenAI wants to become the new Google. The company is transforming from a non -profit research laboratory to a technological giant who aspires to redefine our way of accessing the information. For more than two decades, Google has been almost exclusively our access door to knowledge and information, but Chatgpt’s emergence endangers its position. And in OpenAi they are aware of it. Between bambalins. The company is making a massive investment in infrastructure, building its own data centers in the United States and developing an AI -based search engine. All this while assume losses that exceed 5,000 million dollars annually. The growth potential is enormous: if you no longer need to register to search, it is much faster and more inertial to use it as a Google replacement. Turning point. The elimination of the mandatory registration arrives at a very specific time for OpenAI: it has reached 150,000 million dollars of valuation, and wants to reach 1,000 million users in 2025. That goal would place him at the level of technology giants, and hence a part, surely, the motivation of this movement: reach more people and eliminate friction. Outstanding image | OpenAI In Xataka | With Deep Research, Openai points a clear future. One full of specialized (and very expensive) agents

The new reasoning model lands in the free chatgpt accounts

We are witnessing real time of the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI). A little over two years ago we were surprised by the capacities of GPT-3.5the language model behind Chatgptnow we have Reasoning models increasingly powerful at hand. And everything seems to indicate that this industry will continue to evolve. Early today we talked about Microsoft’s decision To make a version of O1 available to Copilot users, a product that had been limited to payment users. A few hours later we have received news from Openai, which A new reasoning model has just launched. It is tata from O3-mini, who has just begun its initial deployment. O3-mini, the new OpenAI reasoning model The latest OpenAi responds to a strategy that we have already seen with GPT-4o Mini. Instead that everything revolves around its flagship, the company promotes a series of models aimed at addressing different needs. In this way, O3-mini is part of the O3 family presented at the end of last yearbut it is focused on speed and efficiency. It should be noted that those led by Sam Altman had already launched in September 2024, and decided to skip O2 apparently for reasons of registered trademarks. So now we are facing a proposal that promises not only for its fantastic scores in different tests, but because it lands in the chatgpt ‘free’ accounts, also in Spain. But what does this mean? Well, reasoning models differ from the rest of the models, such as GPT-4for its ability to Verify thoroughly and step by step your answers. They channel our questions through a “reasoning.” This does not mean that they cannot be wrong, but the answers are much more successful. Reasoning means time, so this type models are not particularly fast. In any case, for certain scenarios in which reasoned responses are needed in a reasonable amount of time, O3-mini could be a great option. For example, to boost certain applications thanks to access through the API. O3-mini is a model that embraces Stem problems. That is, if what you are looking for is to perform a literary essay, this will probably not be the ideal model. Now, if your requests are related to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics It is likely that this reasoning model can give you some more consistent responses to your needs. OpenAI has measured the reaction of users with O3-mini and O1-mini. According to their data, external testers opted for the responses of the most recent model. In addition, O3-Mini reduced the “important errors” in the “difficult questions of the real world” in 39% during A/B tests, surpassing O1-mini. A notable fact for free access. If you have one Pro $ 200 per month You can use the model unlimitedly ” and with a higher speed than free accounts. OpenAI also has a business plan, Chatgpt Enterprise. In this case, users will have to wait until next week to use the company’s latest reasoning model. Images | OpenAI In Xataka | Mistral AI is the French startup that opted for efficiency before Deepseek. His future is uncertain

What is special Depseek, the new Chinese artificial intelligence tool (and how differs from chatgpt or gemini)

Image source, Getty images January 28, 2025 Updated 7 hours Deepseek, the new Chinese artificial intelligence model (AI), has shaken the digital world, dazzling investors and sinking the actions of some technological companies, after jumping to the top of application downloads in Apple Store. It was launched on January 20 and quickly captivated computer science before attracting the attention of the entire technology and world industry. The president of the United States, Donald Trump, described the phenomenon as an “alarm call” for companies in that country that must concentrate on “compete to win.” What makes Deepseek so special is the statement of its creators that it was produced at a fraction of the cost of other models in the avant -garde of the industry such as the OpenAi chatgpt, because it uses less advanced technology chips. That possibility caused the giant of the production of Chips Nvidia to lose almost US $ 600,000 million of its market value this Monday, the fall in a more loud day in the history of the USA. Deepseek also generates doubts about Washington’s measures to contain Beijing’s impulse to achieve technological supremacy, which includes export restrictions of advanced chips to China. However, Beijing has redoubled its efforts with President Xi Jinping declaring AI as the main priority. And the new companies such as Deepseek are crucial as China turns a traditional manufacturing of clothing and furniture to advanced chips technology, electric cars and AI. Here we tell you what it is. What is Deepseek? In simple terms, Depseek is a chatbot enhanced by AI, like chatgpt. It is a free application that can be downloaded from the Apple Store store, where Depseek states that it is designed “to answer your questions and enhance your life efficiently.” But the AI ​​model that drives it – called R1 – has about 670,000 million parameters, which makes it the largest open source language model to date, according to Anil Ananthaswamy, author of WHY MACHINES LEARN: The Elegant Math Behind Modern AI (“Why do the machines learn: the elegant mathematics behind the modern AI”). Image source, Getty images Photo foot, Hangzhou, where the Depseek operations center is located, also houses other Chinese technological giants such as Alibaba. It is said that it is as powerful as OPENAI’s O1 model, which enhances Chatgpt, in mathematics, coding and reasoning. It is also claimed that he is able to do all that in a much cheaper way; Its developers claim that building it cost $ 6 million, an austere budget compared to the billions invested by AI companies in the US. It is not clear how they got it. The founder of Deepseek supposedly stored advanced NVIDIA chips before his export to China was prohibited in September 2022. Experts believe that this provision, which some estimate in 50,000, allowed him to build such a powerful model when these chips with other cheaper and less sophisticated. How do you compare with chatgpt or gemini? Deepseek looks and feels like any other chatbot, although it leans more towards conversation. Like Openia or GEMINI Chatgpt of Google, you can open the application (or its website) and ask questions about anything, and the chat strives to give you an answer. Your answers are extensive, but you don’t issue an opinion even if you ask you directly by one. The chatbot usually begins by saying that the issue is “highly subjective” -it is politics (is Donald Trump a good president?) Or soft drinks (which one knows better, Pepsi or Coca -Cola?). He does not even commit to saying whether or not it is his rival Chatgpt, but he did a comparison of the pros and cons of both artificial intelligences. Chatgpt did exactly the same, using a similar language. Image source, Reuters Photo foot, Apparently and operation, Depseek is very similar to other rival chatbots. Deepseek indicates that it was trained with data until October 2023 and, although the app seems to have access to updated information, the web version does not have it. That is similar to the first versions of Chatgpt and is probably a similar protection attempt, to prevent chatbot from launching incorrect information to the web in real time. It can also respond quite fast, although it is currently a little stop under the load of so many users running to try it since it went viral. Chatgpt and Gemini tend to promote their subscription services, which can be around US $ 20 per month, for more detailed information, while Deepseek is free although more limited. Censorship of Taboo themes Where there is a palpable difference is in Depseek’s self -censorship when it comes to prohibited issues in China. Sometimes it starts an answer that then disappears from the screen and is replaced by a notice that says “let’s talk about something else.” The obvious taboo theme are the protests in the Tiananmen Plaza in 1989 that ended with the death of 200 civilians at the hands of the Army according to the Chinese government, but some media estimate that it resulted in a massacre of thousands. Like many other Chinese models of AI -Rernie de Baidu or Doubao by Bytedance- Deepseek is scheduled to evade politically sensitive questions. When the BBC asked the app what happened in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, Deepseek did not give detail some about that documented massacre. He replied: “I’m sorry, I can’t answer that question. I am an assistant to the designed to provide useful and harmless answers.” Photo foot, Deepseek evaded the question that BBC asked him about what happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989. For their part, their Chatgpt and Gemini rivals had no taps to expand in this regard. It is believed that one of the great challenges for the development of AI in China is the censorship of the government. But it seems that Depseek has been trained around an open source model, which allows you to perform complex tasks, while retaining certain information. Who is behind Depseek? Deepseek … Read more

What is Deepseek, the new Chinese artificial intelligence that defies Chatgpt

Since its irruption in November 2022, Chatgpt marked a before and after in the field of generative artificial intelligence. His ability to create content, maintain natural conversations and solve complex tasks inspired giants such as Google, Meta and X (formerly Twitter) to develop their own versions. However, A new competitor from China, called Depseek, has begun to capture global attention. This development not only rivals US proposals, but could redefine the rules of the game in the AI ​​sector. What is Deepseek and why is it relevant? Deepseek is a generative artificial intelligence model with capabilities similar to those of its counterparts such as Chatgpt and Gemini. Designed to create content, reason structured and offer advanced solutions, This AI was recently launched in its R1 version. According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, Depseek has already positioned itself as a competitive model thanks to its technical performance and efficiency. In performance tests (benchmarks), China managed to match, and even overcome in certain aspects, to Openai’s GPT-O1 model, released in September. This higher performance, combined with a considerably lower cost, makes Deepseek an attractive option for companies and developers that seek advanced solutions without a high disbursement. Deepseek has several advantages that make it extremely attractive to developers. (Photo: Shuttersock) 5 Deepseek keys that make a difference 1) Advanced and efficient performance Deepseek is not only positioned as a competitive alternative, but demonstrates its ability to match reference models in the sector. Its design has been optimized to perform complex tasks with high precision, placing itself as one of the most promising options in the market. 2) Open source: Transparency and adaptability Unlike the models developed by Openai and Google, Depseek is open source. ANDSto means that your infrastructure is available for experts, developers and users to analyze, customize and improve the model. This characteristic encourages collaboration and innovation, offering flexibility that closed models do not allow. 3) Competitive costs One of Deepseek’s most outstanding points It is its low cost compared to its US rivals. This economic approach seeks to democratize access to advanced AI, allowing more companies, especially emerging ones to take advantage of their potential. 4) Deepthink: A star function Deepseek includes a tool called Deepthink, which uses reasoning chains to emulate cognitive human processes. This allows you to address complex problems more structured and with more precise results. This function has been one of the most prominent in its initial tests. 5) National and international collaboration The model has been developed by a team that combines talents from China technical universities and a background led by Liang Wenfeng, co-founder of High-Flyer. This collaboration, together with the commitment to a low -cost approach, strengthens the competitiveness of the model in the global field. Technological rivalry between China and the US The appearance of Deepseek revives the technological rivalry between the US and China, especially in the AI ​​sector. Historically, the US has led this market, with companies such as OpenAi, Google, Microsoft and Anthropic at the forefront. However, China has intensified its efforts in recent years, investing significantly in the research and development of AI. The Stargate project, an initiative announced during Donald Trump’s second term, has allocated more than $ 500,000 to the development of advanced technologies in artificial intelligence In the US in this context, Depseek emerges as a Chinese response to this supremacy, demonstrating that the Asian giant has the capabilities to compete at the highest level. The rivalry between Chatgpt and Deepseek is a reflection of what is currently living between China and the US (Photo: Shuttersock) The arrival of Deepseek not only represents a new challenge for large American companies, but also opens new opportunities for developers and users interested in exploring more accessible and customizable tools. In terms of business adoption, its open source and lower costs could allow Deepseek to consolidate in markets where competition has been dominated by closed models. However, its long -term success will depend on factors such as the quality of its technical support, constant updates and their ability to maintain high standards of safety and privacy, especially in a global context marked by geopolitical tensions. Deepseek not only represents a technological advance, but also a declaration of intentions by China in the field of artificial intelligence. With a strategy based on collaboration, transparency and accessibility, this model could transform the current panorama of generative AI. However, the true test for Deepseek will be its performance in practical applications and its ability to compete in markets dominated by giants such as OpenAi and Google. In addition, the international perception of the model will also play a crucial role, especially in countries that cautiously observe technological developments from China. In short, Depseek not only expands the range of options in generative artificial intelligence, but also revives the debate on the role of technology in international relations and global innovation. Are we facing the beginning of a new era in technological rivalry between the US and China? Only time will say it. Continue reading: * 3 simple ways to get a new job, according to specialists* Mental challenges that only humans can overcome before artificial intelligence* How artificial intelligence could help us improve our health (tagstotranslate) chatgpt

ChatGPT: What are the Autonomous Agents presented by OpenAI?

OpenAI announced this Thursday the launch of “Operator”an artificial intelligence agent designed to perform tasks on the web autonomously. This tool is available in preview for ChatGPT Pro subscribers in the United States, with a monthly cost of $200. What is Operator? Operator is a artificial intelligence agent which combines the vision capabilities of GPT-4o with advanced reasoning obtained through reinforcement learning. This integration allows Operator to interact with web pages using screenshots and perform actions such as typing, clicking and scrolling through the content. Unlike traditional chatbots, Operator can execute complex tasks autonomouslysuch as shopping for groceries, filing expense reports, making restaurant reservations, and managing corporate data. Operator Capabilities – Autonomous web interaction: Operator can browse websites, fill out forms, and perform online actions without direct human intervention. Its ability to interpret and manipulate web interfaces allows you to automate tasks that previously required manual interaction. – Correction and security: The agent is designed to self-correct and request user intervention when faced with sensitive information or critical actions, thus ensuring safe and reliable use. – Strategic collaborations: OpenAI is working with companies like DoorDash, Instacart and Uber to ensure that Operator meets real market needs, expanding its applicability in various sectors. Significant advance in artificial intelligence The introduction of Operator represents an important step in the evolution of artificial intelligence, marking the transition from simple chatbots to more autonomous agents capable of performing complex tasks. This development has the potential to transform efficiency in the workplace, allowing virtual employees to integrate into the workforce in the near future. Besides, OpenAI anticipates that by 2025, AI-powered assistants that can reason and carry out complex tasks on behalf of users will become commonplace. This advancement not only improves individual productivity, but also has significant implications for various industries seeking to automate routine processes and free up time for more strategic activities. Challenges and considerations Despite Operator’s promising capabilities, there are challenges in its implementation. Some complex web interfaces may present difficulties for autonomous agent interaction. Additionally, although Operator is designed with built-in security features and requests approvals for high-risk tasks, it does not yet handle banking transactions or job application decisions, indicating the need for continuous human oversight in certain contexts. OpenAI’s launch of Operator marks a milestone in the development of autonomous AI agents, offering a powerful tool to automate web tasks and improve efficiency across multiple domains. Keep reading:• OpenAI prepares a new AI for January and this is what we know• OpenAI presented Sora, the AI ​​capable of generating hyperrealistic videos in seconds• OpenAI CEO revealed that the company is losing money for a very peculiar reason

The number of students copying their assignments from ChatGPT results is growing

A recent investigation of Pew Research Center has revealed that the 26% of teenagers in the United States use ChatGPT to do their schoolworkdoubling the 13% recorded in 2023. This increase highlights the growing integration of artificial intelligence tools in educational environments. Demographic differences in ChatGPT usage The study points to significant variations in the use of ChatGPT by race and ethnicity. Both black and Hispanic adolescents reported 31% usecompared to 22% of white adolescents. This trend represents a notable change from the previous year, where the percentages were similar between groups: 11% for whites and 13% and 11% for blacks and Hispanics, respectively. Besides, students in higher grades show a greater propensity to use ChatGPT. 31% of 11th and 12th graders reported using it, compared to 20% of 7th and 8th graders. No significant differences were observed in terms of gender or family income. Perceptions on the acceptability of using ChatGPT Adolescents’ opinions on the acceptability of using ChatGPT vary depending on the academic task. 54% consider it appropriate to use it to research new topics, while only 18% see it appropriate to write essays. Regarding solving mathematical problems, 29% approve and 28% disapprove. These perceptions reflect ongoing discussions about the ethics and role of artificial intelligence in education. Familiarity with ChatGPT directly influences its use. Of the total number of teens surveyed, 79% have heard of the tool, up from 67% in 2023. Among those who have heard a lot about ChatGPT, 56% have used it for schoolwork, up from 18%. of those who have limited knowledge. This increase in ChatGPT use among teens underscores the need for educators and parents to understand and address the impact of artificial intelligence on learning. As these tools become more integrated into academic life, it is essential to establish clear guidelines on their ethical and effective use. Keep reading:– OpenAI launches discount for ChatGPT Plus if you meet these requirements– This famous university will allow its students to use ChatGPT in classes– Is ChatGPT smart enough to get an engineering degree?

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.