Mobile Tech & Gadgets

a 10-story building in 29 hours

by

There are those who think that a solution to housing problem is to build more (although the Polytechnic of Catalunya don’t think the same), but that inevitably takes time. Faced with this need, there are those who have resorted to the prefabricated housingwhose acquisition and assembly is more agile compared to traditional constructions. In fact, in Madrid They have already opted for them to build public flats quickly. But China is simply on another level. A skyscraper against the clock. Because if the work to remove the gotelé, change the floor and assemble the kitchen has cost me a long month in my new apartment, in the Asian country they are revolutionizing architecture with express constructions quite far from the modest prefabricated modules to which we are accustomed. However, in Changsha they have built a 10-story residential building in less than 29 hours. But don’t let the final result fool you: it is still a prefabricated construction. An XXL LEGO. This building of broad It is not new, in fact it dates back to 2021, but five years later it still leaves people speechless due to the synchronization and speed of execution. Furthermore, this project did turn out well, unlike the Sky City that he wanted to build in 90 days. Obviously having more personnel and the three cranes helps, but what is truly different is that we are dealing with a modular off-site construction. Come on, a large part of the work comes from the factory (the manufacturing there It was 15 days) and then it’s time to assemble the pieces. Moving a project of this magnitude to a factory has its advantages in that we are in a controlled environment and not out in the open. The Chinese company has been working on prefabricated steel structures for years. ISO size of a standard shipping container (12.19 meters x 2.44 meters x 3 meters), so they can be transported to the facility without problem by truck. In addition, they can be assembled in height and width as appropriate. The entire building could be dismantled for transportation if necessary. Their secret: B-core steel. These containers are manufactured in B-Core steelwhich consists of two outer stainless steel plates that wrap a core of steel tubes like a sandwich. The structure is joined by fusion by brazing with a copper sheet. In this video From Broad Group you can see the step by step of its manufacture. More important than the technical details is what is gained with this material. To begin with, the carbon footprint drops considerably by minimizing the use of cement (one of the biggest polluters on the planet), so we are facing a more sustainable construction. But it also offers high resistance to corrosion and since it has high ductility, it better supports seismic movements. According to the corporation, it is an earthquake- and typhoon-proof material. Finally, it is ten times lighter than concrete and assembly is faster, so costs, time and labor are reduced. Almost everything comes from the factory. The modules arrive by truck to the building construction site in standard trucks, the finishing and plumbing and electrical assembly already completed. There, the cranes are responsible for lifting them to place them exactly where previously planned, the walls and slabs are deployed in situ and finally, they are fixed with high-strength bolts. All that remains is to connect the supplies. The video is in timelapse. You don’t need it. The Broad group has documented the project in a video which looks like an authentic dance of synchronized choreography where the industrialization of the process on the one hand and the careful planning on the other show in fast motion a process that in real time was equally dizzying: three hours per floor. In Xataka | China opens a new paradigm in road construction: 157 kilometers, 10 machines and a total of zero humans In Xataka | Spain’s obsession with black and white: all new construction buildings are becoming the same building Cover | Broad Group

In 1987 a death was filmed so savage that people had to cover themselves. The trick to achieve it turned RoboCop into a cult work

by

In 1987, the film director Paul Verhoeven gave a twist to action science fiction with RoboCop. In reality, that was a cocktail very much to the director’s liking where there was satire, cyberpunk and police thriller. The difference was that he did not limit himself to telling the fall and rebirth of a hero: he decided to win over the viewer with emotional hammer blows, with a death. so cruel and excessive that it was impossible to look at without feeling uncomfortable. The scene that changed everything. Alex Murphy, the protagonist, appears up to that point as a good cop thrown into a corrupt world, but the film doesn’t have time to build him up calmly, so it does it by the most brutal way: literally, it tear apart in front of the viewer so that, when he returns converted into a machine, he understands that what has been lost is not only flesh, but humanity. Verhoeven explained it with an almost religious and at the same time tremendously cynical idea: “if you want to resurrect Murphy as an all-powerful RoboCop, first you have to crucify him.” And that crucifixion, instead of being symbolic or elegant, is filmed like a physical nightmaredirty and painful, one designed so that the viewer cannot avoid the impact. The slaughter as a narrative. The sequence It is constructed like a public execution, with the criminals laughing in the background, and that is possibly the key to its violence: it is not just that it unlockis that along the way they humiliate him, turn him into a broken toy, and torture him as if the gang were enjoying the show. The scene is escalating until it seems impossiblewith the protagonist trying to understand what is happening to him while his body stops obeying him, and the band acting like real madmen. There is the moral trick of the director of RoboCop: The villains were absolutely grotesque, yes, but the film removes any sympathetic veneer from them and turns them into a total social menace. Thus, when the final shot arrives that puts an end to the execution, the viewer is no longer watching the typical “80s action” film, he is seeing the point of no return that makes the entire film, from that minute on, a story. of loss and revenge. The old school of effects. It is impossible to talk about this classic without mentioning what makes it unique. The how was filmed: no less than under the orders of the legendary Rob Bottin with an artisanal obsession that today seems unthinkable based on meticulously designed prostheses, molds, fake parts and physical tricks. In order for the mutilation to work without putting the actor at risk, a a fake hand From a real mold, it was reconstructed in fiberglass and divided into sections so that it could be “popped” with compressed air and stage blood without the need for explosives near the face. It wasn’t just an effect, it was a device home engineering: internal blood tubes, pressure control, parts that could be assembled and disassembled, and a repeatable explosion pattern to always nail the same result. “Death” was also filmed with a staging designed to hide the real and sell the fakewith raised floors, holes through which to put the real arm under the stage, and a member of the team moving from below a false arm attached with Velcro as if it were a living limb. The underground trick. Plus: Murphy’s death is supported by a secret choreography that the viewer never saw: operators out of shot, hidden mechanisms and an absurd number of hands working to make a second of screen seem like an organic nightmare. Not only that: a foam arm in disguise with a police uniform, a metal structure to hold it, hinges at the “elbow” and even a support anchored to the false floor so that everything could resist the violence of the effect. While the actor was dying and staggering above, below there was a team of professionals pumping blood by hand and adjusting compressed air. Even the shots that “break up” the armor were reinforced with simple but brilliant physical details, such as small charges of talcum powder to simulate fragmentation, a very cheap solution that, in camera, added texture and turned the scene into something tactile, with dust, impacts and material that seems to fall off the body. The Peter Weller doll. Another stroke of genius came with the moment of the auction: for a final shot that in the released version lasts a sigh, a Murphy’s full torsoa sophisticated doll with a latex face made from a mold of the actor, an internal fiberglass skull and mechanisms to move the neck, jaw and body. It was not a static mannequin, it was a creature manipulated by cablescapable of opening his mouth in a silent scream, leaning, trembling and reacting to the shot as if there was still life inside. The execution was designed so that the back of the head “jumped out” with a controlled explosionwith pieces pre-cut to break in a specific way and with the interior prepared with blood and soft fragments, so that the horror felt mechanical but compelling. In addition, the “sweat” detail was added with water sprayas if the doll was breathing for the last time, and a motor with vibration so that the body seems to tremble with fear, an almost obscene trick due to its human nature that returns to artifice. Censorship as an enemy. The most incredible thing is that, even so, what was seen in the rooms was a cropped version. RoboCop’s violence clashed head-on with the rating system of the time, and the film was given an X rating several times, forcing reedit, cut and sacrifice material until a commercially viable qualification is achieved. Paradoxically, the cut that helped save it was one that its own creators considered “shabby” or too obvious, the moment in which Murphy’s arm flies off pulled by a … Read more

Gen Z men are embracing “old money” dressing

by

Lately, the Instagram algorithm registration has changed. Where once infinite-soled sneakers and sweatshirts with logos that screamed from a mile away dominated, now there are movie videos, martinis served in cut-crystal glasses, and twenty-year-old boys who look like they’ve stepped out of a film set in the late 1950s. They’ve left behind the uniform of hypebeast to dress like Paul Newman on a yacht on the Riviera or like a young JFK Jr. on Martha’s Vineyard. It’s not just a wardrobe choice, it’s a symptom. As CNN explainswe are facing an “intentional, defined by moderation” change, where young men align their clothing with the way they want to be perceived today: as men with purpose and control. But behind this facade of neatness, lies a much more complex narrative about fear of the future and a worrying ideological drift that has been found in the Barbour jacket. his definitive banner. The change is palpable in the data. According to Lyst trends reportglobal demand for quarter-zip sweaters (quarter-zips) increased 31% by the end of 2025. Similarly, searches for the iconic loafers Le Loafer of Saint Laurent rose 66%. But if we look further, the data from the technology consultancy Heuritech They are revealing of this conservative turn: searches for boots with an equestrian aesthetic have increased by 39% and gingham prints, typical of the 1950s, have grown by 33%. The language of success is no longer streetwear disruptive; now it is “quiet luxury”. This trend has jumped from the catwalks to lifestyle. According to Business InsiderGeneration Z is “storming” golf courses, a sport that has historically been the playground of the mature elite. Interest has risen 30% since 2016, and in 2023 more than 3.4 million young people played for the first time. It is no longer just about clothes, but about inhabiting the spaces of exclusivity to, As some experts point outnot to be left out of the “business conversations” that occur in the greens. A piece that marks the change On this aesthetic chessboard, the king piece is the Barbour jacket. It was born in 1894 to protect fishermen and sailors, but now it is part of a different identity sign. Margaret Barbour understood in the 80s that the future of the brand involved capitalizing on its connection with the old money, achieving that Queen Elizabeth II and the then Prince Charles made it the symbol of the British rural aristocracy. In Spain, this return has taken a specific form: it has become the aesthetic fever of the right-wing kids. What was once a functional garment for the countryside is today a status symbol in the city that visually separates those who long for a traditional order from those who transitory fashions follow. The Barbour, with its paraffin smell and tartan lining, functions as armor that projects stability and class membership, even if the wearer does not own an acre of land. This turn does not occur in a vacuum. It coincides with what academics like Vivek Chibber define as the sunset of “wokism”. After years in which brands focused on social activism (from Black Lives Matter to Bud Light’s trans campaigns), the pendulum has swung strongly Towards the conservative side. The corporations they are dismantling their Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs to avoid boycotts and align with an electorate that rejects “political correctness.” As Nesrine Malik analyzes in your column for Guardianthe fall of woke up is largely due to their “capture by elites.” For Malik, the patrician class hijacked identity politics, turning social justice into an exercise in symbolic gestures and elitist language (such as the use of Latinx or pronouns in bios) that ended up alienating the working class. This “diluted and flaccid version” of social justice, created in the image and likeness of the privileged, has provoked massive rejection. In this scenario, youth are no longer looking for “allies”, but rather authority figures and brands that, like Barbour, represent a tangible and unambiguous moral heritage. Barbour’s collaboration with Chloé is the death certificate of the progressive avant-garde: the aesthetics of privilege are now the only refuge value. A hierarchy of exclusion What we previously knew simply as style preppyfor Generation Z it is now, as defined by GQ“a character you can play.” Inspired by figures like Dickie Greenleaf in The talent of Mr. Ripleyyoung people look for clothes that “reveal that you have, at least, a yacht parked in the port.” However, this interpretation has an ideological “B side”. In his academic research The Fascist Potential of the ‘Old Money’ Trendresearcher Veronica Bezold warns that aesthetics It’s not just innocent nostalgia.. Bezold points out that the content old money On social media, he often portrays “new money”—technological or minority-linked fortunes—as something “vulgar.” By glorifying the “purity” of lineage and inherited wealth, Bezold argues that the trend aestheticizes neoliberalism and connects with radical right narratives of exclusion. A social hierarchy is thus validated where the value of a person depends on their origin and not their effort, feeding a historical amnesia about a past that was only “golden” for a few. The question underlying all of this is: why does a generation that lives in economic inequality dress like the class that ruined its future? The answer is sociological. A report in Curation Edit describe this phenomenon as “survival cosplay”. in a market inaccessible real estate and a bowling economy (gig economy), dressing like an heir is a way of claiming a stability they do not possess. “If you can’t buy a house, at least you can buy cream-colored pants that say you could,” they point out. But there is a deeper power component. As Martina Porta explains in his academic thesis The habitus of politicsthe wardrobe is an institutional communication tool that builds an image of authority. By adopting this style, the young Gen Z seeks to integrate into the habitus of the ruling classes to appear “competent” and “employable” in an increasingly rigid system. It’s a mimicry strategy: if you can’t beat … Read more

the “bug” of toxic relationships

by

Love without a doubt is a really complicated matter to understandsince falling in love is not something mechanical or that has a great perfect theory behind it. There are several voices that try to shed light on this, with messages such as that one falls in love with whoever one wants. by the psychoanalyst Gabriel Rolón. But the truth is that Science has put the data on the table to understand loveand childhood trauma is undoubtedly very present. The theory of attachment. Formulated by John Bowlby and that suggests that the dynamic with our primary caregivers installs an emotional “operating system.” In this way, if there was security during childhood, a secure attachment develops, but if there were problems in childhood, the brain develops insecure attachments, whether anxious or avoidant. Current science has gone a little further and has managed to measure the duration of this effect, confirming that what happens in the first years does not stay there, but rather dictates the architecture of our future relationships. The trauma. A very recent study, published in 2025analyzed 1,404 university students using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. The results are devastating for those who believe that romantic love is random, since the research found a chain effect where childhood trauma not only bothersbut rather negatively predicts romantic satisfaction in adulthood. The most relevant finding of this study is mediation. The data statistically confirm that early traumatic experiences generate an insecure attachment, and it is this attachment style that triggers the low quality of the relationship that is formed. There is precisely a direct correlation that validates that, the greater the early injuries, the lower the neurological and emotional capacity to enjoy a partner, unless this mechanism is intervened. From adolescence to adulthood. If the 2025 study offers us a snapshot of today, a work published in 2008 gives us the complete movie. In this case, research was done with 559 young people from Iowa to track the subjects from their adolescence to early adulthood. The fascinating thing about this follow-up is how positive family interactions during adolescencecharacterized by warmth and low hostility, accurately predicted greater security of romantic attachment years later. This means that if the family environment resolved problems without aggression, the young person’s brain learned that this is the norm of intimacy, successfully replicating it with their partners in adult life. That is, much less toxic relationships were formed. A dangerous pattern. Perhaps the hardest part of the recent evidence is that it links these patterns not only to unhappiness, but to violence. A specific study confirmed that an insecure attachment derived from “harsh parenting” and hostile parents directly correlates with aggression in adult couples. Basically, the conflict resolution patterns experienced at home are modeled and repeated. In the same line, a study published in 2024 points out that repeated trauma alters internal models, increasing vulnerability. People with these wounds are not only at greater risk of aggression, but of tolerating abusive relationships because their internal danger “alarms” are out of calibration. Having normalized conflict since childhood, the brain does not identify toxicity as an immediate threat, but as a familiar environment. Are we doomed? In these situations, it is logical to think that if you have had a tough childhood with a complicated family environment, then all future love relationships will be doomed to be toxic. But the reality is that no, since destiny is not written in stone, although it is engraved in the neurons. The same study published in 2025 shed important light by discovering the social support clock, demonstrating that external support acts as a moderator capable of cushioning the impact of insecure attachment on the couple’s relationship. Images | Mayur Gala In Xataka | The science of being single: a macro study warns that well-being plummets if you have not had a partner by 25

It is alive, it grows and repairs itself

by

There are many reasons to look for a cement substitute, but one of the most important is that your industry is responsible. 7% of global CO2 emissions. Thus, we have already seen moderately viable solutions with ecological mortar and even with shellsbut the Federal Polytechnic School of Zurich has been looking for its replacement in nature for some time. Better said, in living materials such as bacteria, algae and fungi. And he has found it precisely in cyanobacteria. It sounds strange, but it has more advantages than it seems. The challenge of replacing concrete. In an industry that revolves around classic materials such as steel, concrete or cement (which, after all, is part of the cement recipe), the search for a replacement entails great implications in terms of infrastructure and costs. Assuming that the minimum expected is that it has similar mechanical characteristics, the search for an alternative involves a material that is better, since the manufacture of traditional concrete consumes a large amount of resources, the pollution is very high and it also degrades over time. This concrete is alive. Literally. The research team has managed to stably incorporate cyanobacteria into a printable gel to develop a living photosynthetic material that nourishes, grows and removes carbon dioxide from the air in the process, as detailed. in Nature magazine. This material can be molded with 3D printing and requires sunlight, nutrients from artificial seawater, and carbon dioxide to grow. The matrix is ​​a water-rich hydrogel composed of cross-linked polymers with a geometry such that it facilitates the transport of light, carbon dioxide, nutrients and water. That is, so that cyanobacteria live longer and better. 3D printed structure. ETH Zurich From passive material to carbon sink. Concrete is also a passive material, that is, once fixed in the structures it stays there, degrading over time. So ETH Zurich has proposed a paradigm shift in which buildings go from being an inevitable source of emissions to becoming an active organism that can clean the atmosphere, something like a plant. Thus, the biotechnological system is made up of cyanobacteria integrated into the matrix of the material, so that its structure protects them while they perform their function. On the one hand, by minimizing the use of cement, you reduce process emissions. On the other hand, it not only stops emissions: this system sequesters atmospheric carbon permanently in its structure. And it is no small thing: according to Yifan Cui, one of the two main authors of the study, “the material can store carbon not only in the form of biomass, but also in the form of minerals, a special property of these cyanobacteria.” However, cyanobacteria are one of the oldest forms of life on the planet and are extremely efficient at photosynthesis. Mineralized carbon dioxide in the structure. ETH Zurich The “magic” equation of photosynthesis. When microorganisms absorb carbon dioxide with sunlight, a biomineralization process is carried out by which this dioxide turns into calcium carbonate, reinforcing the structure of the material with this mineral, which also has the ability to store carbon dioxide in a more stable way. In its laboratory tests, in 400 days the material was able to store 26 mg of CO₂ per gram of material, notably more than the 7 mg of CO₂ per gram of recycled concrete. A concrete that “heals” itself. This generated mineral becomes a glue that holds everything together, improving its structural integrity over time. Something that is inevitable about concrete is that it cracks, but in this case, when microcracks appear, the entry of moisture and oxygen reacts to the bacteria, which secrete this mineral to seal it. In short, it heals itself. This healing capacity is an asset in terms of maintenance costs, minimizing corrosion of reinforcing steel in hybrid structures. There is already cyanobacteria concrete. Moving from the laboratory to the real world is a critical process that this project has already successfully overcome: in the Venice Architecture Biennale Several large blocks can be found (the largest is three meters high) in the exhibition. Be careful because, as they detail, each of these blocks is capable of storing up to 18 kilograms of carbon dioxide per year, rivaling with an adult tree. And now what? As explains Mark Tibbit, Professor of Macromolecular Engineering at ETH Zurich, Mark Tibbitt, in the future want to study “how it can be used as a façade cladding to capture CO₂ throughout the entire life cycle of a building.” For it to go from being a laboratory project with samples in exhibitions to reality, challenges such as scalability and costs, as well as mechanical properties and the survival of the bacteria, will have to be faced. In Xataka | We had been looking for an alternative to cement for decades. We just found it in seashells In Xataka | In our battle against plastic, we have centrifuged bacteria. And its cellulose is postulated as the ideal substitute Cover | ETH Zurich

The first step to achieve this is a megamine in Sweden

by

In world geopolitics, having oil, gas or rare earths (let us remember that They are neither earth nor are they rare) is the equivalent of starting a game of mus with several kings in hand. And if we talk about rare earths, this map of the world’s (known) reserves It shows that China has the best possible hand. Finding rare earths in your territory is very good, then you have to know how to extract them and create an industry around them. This is neither easy nor quick nor cheap. The good news is that the European Union could cover 18% of its lanthanide needs. The not so good thing is that first he has to launch a megaproject: the Per Geijer supermine, in Kiruna (Sweden). Per Geijer has never been just any mine. In fact, it is the underground iron mine largest in the world (the underground surname is important in that the Brazilian Carajás Complex produces more but in the open pit and the Australian Hamersley Ranges has a larger deposit) and also the most ambitious and complex metal mining project that the European Union has faced in decades. The mine is operated by the state through the public company Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag (LKAB). That it has rare earths makes it special, but how they are present is also particular: it is not a pure lanthanide mine, but a high-grade iron deposit with significant concentrations of phosphorus and rare earth oxides. How much? Early 2026 LKAB estimates 2.2 million tons of rare earth oxides, more than double what I thought about 2023. Mine in Kiruna. LKAB Why is it important. As noted in the intro, because China processes about 90% of the world’s rare earths and taking into account the mine’s estimates, if these rare earths could be extracted for use, the European Union could cover 18% of its needs. according to LKAB estimates. Own resources instead of having to buy them, which leads to dependencies on third parties, market fluctuations and diplomacy. In mining, the time between discovery and the first ton of commercial around between 15 and 20 years old. But the European Union has considered it as a strategic project, so it is on the “fast track” thanks to the Critical Raw Materials Law (CRMA). under the microscope. The presence of these oxides in a high-grade iron mine like Per Geijer hides a couple of aces up its sleeve: processing synergy and phosphorus, another strategic element (but less so). And the cost of extracting rare earths is more profitable when there is already an operation to extract iron. On the other hand, these lanthanides are trapped in apatite, which is essentially calcium phosphate. Through magnetic separations for iron and chemicals, two high-value products emerge: one is the rare earth concentrate and the other is phosphoric acid, essential for fertilizers. The northern triangle. Although the site is located in Kiruna, the project is actually an industrial ecosystem made up of three points: Kiruna for extraction, Malmberget for concentration and Luleå is in charge of separation. Thus, the Kiruna deposit provides the mineral from a new deposit of iron, phosphorus and rare earths discovered next to the current mine, about 700 meters away. Malmberget provides the volume of rare earths from the already operational iron mine from apatite waste and also from what will be extracted. Finally, Luleå provides chemical technology with a processing center in charge of separating the rare earths from the rest using hydrometallurgical technology. The schedule until it is operational. Although the normal thing would be to have to wait almost 20 years, we have already seen that the EU has stepped on the accelerator. Tunnels are currently being built to connect the current Kiruna iron mine with the new deposit. In 2026, Malmberget plans to have permits to open a new plant to treat apatite, and the Luleå plant is expected to be operational by the end of this year. However, for the large-scale commercial plant to be commercialized, estimates point to the 2030s due to the series of permits and environmental evaluations that must be successfully passed. It won’t be easy. Despite the importance of rare earths in the EU plans and the apparent profitability of the process, the megaproject faces several challenges beyond the technical and the inherent waste generated. Without going any further, the city of Kiruna itself is sinking and its citizens have to move, literally, building by building, to allow mining expansion, as picks up CNBC. Furthermore, there is conflict with the indigenous Sami peoplesince the site is located on reindeer grazing routes. In Xataka | Spain has a plan to become a rare earth powerhouse and stop depending on China: you will recycle In Xataka | Europe wants to be competitive in the rare earths market. Its enemies are old acquaintances: China and Europe itself Cover | LKAB

the real money is in customizing them

by

Supercar and luxury car brands they know their clients very well and they know that an expensive car is no longer enough: they want something exclusive that no one else can have. For this reason, extreme customization has become a very profitable business within the luxury segment, to the point that custom programs compete in importance with the mass production of the models themselves. ​Customers are no longer satisfied with choosing a certain color or finish of the upholstery. You want unique craftsmanship that turns each car into a unique piece that reflects the personality of its owner. In this context, Porsche makes its customers’ wishes come true with Sonderwunsch, which could literally be translated as “special wishes.” Its name already suggests what that department of the Porsche factory in Zuffenhausen, north of Stuttgart, is dedicated to. Sit down with Porsche to design your car A little over two years ago, practically only Bentley and Rolls-Royce offered their customers the possibility of customize down to the last detail the design of their cars. However, currently the brands themselves recognize that the turnover from their artisanal customization workshops is a lucrative business that can double the price of their supercars. According to the official dataFerrari made a profit of 1,525 million euros in 2024. Some 1,300 million euros of those profits were billed from units that had gone through the Ferrari Atelier. Now, and given its recent drop in salesit is Porsche that gives an additional push to its artisanal customization department with more options for its customers. Have you always wanted to have a Porsche? We do it for you just as you dreamed of. That’s what Sonderwunsch offers, Porsche’s program for customers who want to go beyond the configurator options and create something truly personal. Porsche customization goes in layers Porsche has designed a layering system based on the customization requirements of its customers. The first level, the most basic, begins with the brand configurator. Here you can choose a certain range of colors, finishes and equipment defined by the brand. The second level of customization goes through the program Porsche Exclusive Manufaktur for more advanced (and expensive) customization options such as designing special colors that are not available in the configurator range or unique finishes. The last layer is Sonderwunsch, which fulfills requests that no one else can fulfill. The brand explains that Exclusive Manufaktur already allows deep customizations, such as exclusive metallic paints or upholstery with custom prints, but Sonderwunsch takes everything to another level with one-off projects or limited series. Porsche 911 GT3 (992) Le Mans Tribute 1985 With these extreme customization options, the German brand wants its customers to create the cars they have always dreamed of in close collaboration with its design and manufacturing experts. Alexander Fabig, Vice President of Individualization and Classics at Porsche, explains that “Since the beginning, we have constantly increased our personalization offering and made it more attractive to our customers.” Sonderwunsch allows its wealthiest clients to do things the brand configurator will never offer: color schemes created from scratchspecific wheel designs, body or interior modifications with hand-picked materials for a single car. Porsche 911 GT3 RS (992) The most ambitious projects, the so-called “one-off factory”, are conceived as unique pieces with its own approval, a process that can involve hundreds of employees for more than two years. Fabig admits that “most of our Sonderwunsch customers are absolute Porsche experts” and know the products “in and out.” The Sonderwunsch trip begins with the owner’s visit to the Porsche factory museum in Zuffenhausen, where he will sit down with a team of brand specialists who will listen to his initial idea and launch a technical, legal and economic feasibility study of the project. As and how they stand out in DiaryMotoronly the previous study requires an advance payment of 150,000 euros to demonstrate that the client is serious. Dreams come true, but they are not free. Porsche 911 Speedster 993 by Luca Trazzi ​Some of the most representative examples that Porsche shows is that of Luca Trazzi, who created a 911 Speedster 993 in “Otto Yellow” color, inspired by his dog Otto, who sports a unique yellow and black checkered interior made specifically for him. A one-off of these characteristics can cost millions and take more than two years, but the result is an approved and unique car. A KM0 Porsche is another story Porsche is not limited to the extreme customization of new cars or the creation of debut works in its artisan workshops. The brand has developed, within the Sonderwunsch umbrella, a kind of time machine with which cars that left the factory decades ago can be used again. As and how do they count in Mortor1the “Zero Miles” program allows cars to be restored from the factory to the point that, legally, their odometer can read zero kilometers again so that customers can return to release a historic supercar. This program only applies to three very special models for the German brand: Carrera GT, 959 and 918 Spyder. The process is exhaustive since the car is revised to the millimeter, all the parts that need it are restored or the necessary components are manufactured again, without forgetting the customization of details such as color, upholstery or even certain dynamic aspects to improve your behavior. When this process is finished, Porsche offers the customer the same warranty with which the car originally left the factory because, technically, the car is new again…even if it stopped being produced a couple of decades ago. In Xataka | Bill Gates was so obsessed with driving a Porsche 959 that he managed to change the laws that prevented him from doing so Image | porsche

some need chips and others need power

by

Under such a reflex (and common, in my case) act of taking out the cell phone and opening Gemini or have a browser tab open with ChatGPT There is a huge infrastructure behind it. I am a free user of both models, but AI is a long-distance race that is worth a lot of money. Hence, companies with a solid ecosystem such as Google or Meta can better endure this initial phase of expansion and that OpenAI already has it on its roadmap. put advertising. I have mentioned two products that I use daily and that are competitors, but on a global stage they are on the same team: the United States. On the other side of the ring, China. Because the other power that has entered the race is China (Europe is still finding its feet). In fact, his government has outlined a detailed plan to dominate it by 2027. While in China the push for artificial intelligence is led by the government, in the United States it is the private sector. Two different ways of understanding the business that constitute the tip of the iceberg of two routes that, despite having a common goal, increasingly diverge. Different investment approaches. If we talk about investment, the difference is abysmal: in the United States, a venture capital investment of 175 billion dollars was made, according to data from China International Capital Corp. If we look for a figure from a reference entity within the US, signatures like PitchBook up the ante up to 222 billion (brutal: of every 3 dollars invested in startups in the US, 2 go directly to AI) and Crunchbase estimates it at 168 billion dollars. In any case, light years ahead of China, which is around 6 billion dollars, according to the Stanford AI Index Report. Focusing on business, the range narrows: American big tech companies invested six times more than their Chinese counterparts, according to with data from Pitchbook and FactSet. And if we combine public and private, too: in China the sum amounts to 165,000 million dollars in recent years, well behind the 563,000 million coming from companies and the US government. An obvious thing: state and private capital have different expectations in terms of profitability, investment horizons and target sectors. A concrete example: China has just launched its first LLM aimed at agriculturea strategic sector for the state that is surely not among the first interests of the US private sector. And this is key to understanding their divergent growth trajectories. Where does each one invest?. In China, money is flowing into underlying technologies, with advanced semiconductors leading the way. as explained by CICC. In the United States, on the contrary, the absolute priority is the construction of data centers, a slow and full of so many obstacles that until they consider the spaceand energy infrastructure able to meet the demand. And it makes sense, as each one’s case is particular: China is facing a technology blockade that has made it have to dig in its heels and step on the accelerator to achieve self-sufficiency and thus address the scarcity of resources derived from its restricted access to latest generation chips. In the case of the United States, the combination of aging energy infrastructure and strong growth in electricity demand has reactivated its search for new energy sources, with significant geopolitical effects, and has returned prominence to industries such as nuclear. What if it’s a bubble? In the midst of the growth phase of the sector and with countries putting all their efforts into action, it is inevitable to think that sooner or later the bubble could burst. For the Nobel Prize winner in Economics Michael Spence, we are facing a “rational bubblethus justifying the investments: “The cost of coming in third place in the competition is much greater than the losses derived from overinvestment or inefficiency” he explained in the Taihu World Cultural forum. At last month’s FII Priority Asia forum in Tokyo, SoftBank Group founder and CEO Masayoshi Son attempted to allay fears explaining that “if AI were to generate 10% of global gross domestic product in the long term, it would more than offset trillions of dollars in AI spending.” In any case, there are surveys that give food for thought. In Xataka | The race for AI has placed China in an unthinkable scenario: forcing the United States to leave its comfort zone In Xataka | Europe is discovering right now that the US is not the partner it thought. And that is a problem in AI. Cover | Gemini

the “death bloom” of Ceylon palm trees

by

There are plants that are born and die in a year, but every rule there is an exception, with species that spend decades in silence, accumulating energy for a single, spectacular final act. This is the case of Corypha umbraculiferabetter known like Ceylon Palmwhich has flourished again in the Palmetum from Santa Cruz de Tenerife. An event that is historical because it occurs once every 30 or 60 years and that, on the European continent, can only be witnessed here. A special variant. The Corypha umbraculifera It’s not just any palm treesince it has the largest inflorescence in the world, with a branched structure that sprouts at the top and can reach between 5 and 7 meters in height. To give us an idea, only “the flower” is as tall as a two-story house. This specimen of the Palmetum, planted in 1997, began its reproductive process in October 2025 and after months of preparation, now in January 2026, the spectacle is fully visible from the so-called “Red Route” from the Tenerife botanical garden. A unique phenomenon. This is a species that has ‘monocarpy’, a scientific term to define the botanical suicide that this palm tree faces. In this way, the plant dedicates all its energy accumulated over decades to producing millions of flowers and, later, fruits. Once its reserves are exhausted, it dies. And it is something unique, since the Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife is the only garden on the continent that has managed to see this species bloom on two occasions (the previous one was a different specimen years ago). And its origin is not in the Canary Islands, but comes from Southeast Asia, where its leaves were historically used as paper for religious manuscripts. Why so much? The fact of having to wait 30 or 60 years to flower is something that responds to an evolutionary strategy of the species. In this way, by flowering only once in such an explosive way, it produces such a quantity of fruits that local predators such as rodents are unable to eat them all. Thus, the palm tree ensures that, even if it dies, thousands of its descendants manage to germinate. The process we are seeing now in Tenerife is the final phase of its life. According to the official records of the Palmetum and local media as Notice Diarythe process is slow, but unstoppable, since during the next few months, the flowers will give way to fruits and, gradually, the structure of the palm tree will wither until its final collapse. The Palmetum. This event is not just an aesthetic curiosity; It is a triumph for the Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife. This space, which is technically a botanical garden built on an old landfill, has established itself as the best collection of palm trees in the world in an urban environment and the truth is that it has managed to grow anything. For botany and photography enthusiasts, this is an opportunity that is unlikely to be repeated on European soil for decades. The “wonderful death”, as some local media already call it, is a reminder that nature has its own times, sometimes slow, but always relentless. Images | Wikipedia In Xataka | Finding a partner for the “loneliest plant in the world” has been one of the great challenges of botany. Now AI wants to solve it

The richest people in the world in 2026, grouped in a single graph

by

If 2025 has left us anything, it has been a concentration of wealth in a few hands that had never been observed before. a report Oxfam Intemón estimates the growth of these great fortunes at 16% in 2025, this represents growth three times faster than the annual average of the last five years. The joint assets of the 20 largest fortunes in the world adds a total of 3.8 trillion dollarswhich represents a figure higher than GDP of most countries of the planet. That is, the fortune of the people who occupy the top 20 on the Forbes list would equal in wealth what countries like France (with a GDP of 3.36 trillion dollars and 68.6 million inhabitants), Italy (with 2.54 trillion dollars and 59 million inhabitants) produce in a year. To show the dimension of these fortunes in a more visual and easy to understand way, in Visual Capitalist have created a graph of the 20 richest people in the world of 2026 based on data extracted from the Forbes list of millionaires. The graph allows us to see a clear pattern: the AI is making gold to whoever touches it. The unbeatable Musk If there is something that stands out at first glance, it is the enormous wealth difference that separates the largest fortune in the world from the second. As of January 6, 2026, the date on which the “photo finish” was made to create this graph, Elon Musk’s estimated net worth was $714.2 billion. If we go back just five years ago, in 2020 the richest person was Jeff Bezos with a net worth of $145 billion. That is, the Musk’s current fortune is five times what it was in 2020 just five years ago the richest person in the world. That It’s not the only record that has marked Musk’s fortune in 2025. The businessman of South African origin has been the first person to have exceeded 700,000 million dollars, and is among the most likely candidates to become the first billionaire in history. Musk’s fortune in 2020 was “only” $24.6 billion, in a year in which the millionaire began to reap the benefits of the good sales results that the Tesla Model 3 were beginning to give, which had already surpassed your production problems. That represents a capital growth of 2,804% in just five years. Artificial intelligence: King Midas of the 21st century Five years ago, the “Top 10” of the largest fortunes was dominated by the founders of social networks, electronic commerce platforms and, among them, the undaunted Warren Buffett. On the other hand, today, the wealth of the world’s biggest millionaires is determined by their involvement in the development of AI. A good example is found in the leading role in that negotiation of the millionaires who occupy the first six positions. Leaving Musk aside, in second position is Larry Page, co-founder of Google and its parent company Alphabet, which thanks to the latest movements in the industry, have turned Gemini into the Apple native AI and in one of the models most influential in the industry. In 2025, Alphabet shares have appreciated by 63%which has had a favorable impact on the fortunes of the company’s founders. His partner, Sergei Brin, occupies fifth position, although in recent days he has climbed to third position. Given such a wealth boost, Jeff Bezos he had no choice He had to give up positions, leaving his 251.7 billion in third position in the ranking, although the recent boost in the fortune of Google’s founders has dragged him to fourth position, which to date was occupied by Larry Ellison, with an estimated fortune of 242.6 billion dollars. Ellison’s rise to the top of this list as one of the biggest fortunes of 2026 is another example of the level of enrichment and power that has provided AI to these millionaires. To put it in context, in just a few days, the founder of Oracle increased his fortune at 102 billion dollars. The arrival of AI caught Meta immersed in the metaverseand his latest decisions have not been the most applauded by investors. This has caused Mark Zuckerberg’s personal fortune to fall to $226.5 billion in 2026. However, if we look at it with perspective, the founder of Facebook had a net worth of $68.8 billion in 2020, so its increase has been 229% in just five years. Special mention in this section dedicated to AI goes to Jensen Huang, who occupies eighth position on the list of greatest fortunes thanks to the price of NVIDIA shares. However, Huang’s case is especially revealing of the link between AI and wealth growth of its main architects. In 2020, the CEO of NVIDIA declared $4.7 billion. In 2025, That fortune is estimated at 162.5 billion dollars. At the current value of his company, Huang stands to lose the equivalent of his fortune in 2020. in a single morning. There are millionaires beyond AI We have to reach seventh position on the list of the biggest fortunes in the world in 2026 to find the first millionaire who, at least a priori, is not involved with AI. This is Bernard Arnault, who since losing his throne as the richest person in the world in 2023 has lived a real roller coaster of rises and falls in the valuation of his fortune due to the crisis of LVMH’s luxury liquor and spirits divisions and the drop in sales in China of his Louis Vuitton flagship brand. In ninth position we find Warren Buffett, a veteran investor who has been able to read the markets to surf the wave of stock market swings to remain at the top of the list of the greatest fortunes in the world during the years. last 20 years. However, and to the envy of the S&P 500, the profitability of his fortune in the last five years has been 98.5%, going from $73.4 billion in 2020 to the $147.5 billion at which his current fortune … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.