Today the green turtles are finally out of danger

Halfway between South America and Africa, in the immensity of the Atlantic Ocean, a small volcanic point emerges that is the ascension island. For centuries, this piece of land was the scene of a systematic massacre, but today it represents one of the greatest success stories of marine conservation in the 21st century, culminating last October with a historic announcement that the green turtle has officially gone from being “endangered” to being classified as “least concern.” His story. To understand the magnitude of the Ascension phenomenon, you must first understand the journey since each season, thousands of green turtles They travel 2,300 kilometers from the coasts of Brazil to this remote island to spawnthat is, release their eggs. But… How do they manage to find this small island in an ocean as enormous as the Atlantic? A GPS. The famous biologist Archie Carr proposed in his day that these creatures use a kind of “olfactory GPS”, with which they were capable of find chemical fingerprints dissolved in the ocean currents that emanate from the island. Although the exact mechanics remain the subject of study, since genetic analyzes based on mitochondrial DNA leave no doubt that there are perfectly differentiated Atlantic populations and that of Ascension has a unique signature. In fact, studies indicate that turtles born in Ascensión travel throughout the American continent, representing between 43% and 47% of those captured on the coasts of Uruguay and entering the Patagonian Sea. A dark past. Since its discovery in 1501, Portuguese and British sailors saw Ascension not as a sanctuary, but as an all-you-can-eat buffet, as has been masterfully documented. in works as Ascension: The Story of a South Atlantic Island by Duff Hart-Davis. For centuries, common practices were “flipping” where sailors literally turned turtles over on the beach, immobilizing them to keep them alive with their fresh meat for months. Here there are historical testimonies such as that of chaplain John Ovington in 1691 who recounts the industrialized slaughter of these reptiles, which were sent alive to England to satisfy the demand for “turtle soup.” Something that brought the species to the brink of extinction. A turning point. It arrived in 1977, and coincides with the moment it began control and monitoring of this species on nesting beaches, reversing centuries of human impact. And the results indicate that while in 1977 3,752 nests were counted annually, today the island hosts more than 25,000 nests each year. Images | wirestock on Freepik In Xataka | We have been thinking for 40 years that Spain escaped Chernobyl because it was far away. AEMET has discovered that it was pure luck

The Musk-Altman trial, the soap opera of the year in Silicon Valley

That Elon Musk and Sam Altman hate each other It’s nothing new. The news is that their rivalry is about to reach the courts. Yesterday jury selection took place which will decide whether, as Musk says, OpenAI violated its founding agreement to be a nonprofit organization. Much more is judged than that; The case aims to be a soap opera in which years of personal conflict will be aired. The accusation. In 2024, Elon Musk sued Sam Altman and OpenAI for having broken the company’s founding agreement, which said that “OpenAI is a non-profit artificial intelligence research company.” The CEO of SpaceX, who was one of the founders of OpenAI, claims that he was scammed and as soon as they got his money ($38 million) “he radically changed the narrative and dedicated himself to profiting (…) taking advantage of his humanitarian concern.” Musk calls for the dismissal of Sam Altman and his president, Greg Brockman, as well as $134 billion that would go to the nonprofit arm of OpenAI. OpenAI’s response. According to the company, Elon Musk was aware of the plan become a for-profit entitywhich was a necessary step for the company. OpenAI says that Musk is jealous and “regrets having retired” in 2018. In addition, they say that the money Musk contributed was not an investment, but a donation, and does not give him any ownership rights over OpenAI, as they say in Guardian. The breakup. OpenAI was founded in 2015 and shortly after, in 2017, it became clear that developing the dreamed-of AGI was going to require a lot of money, something difficult to achieve as a non-profit company. Here the option of a collaboration between OpenAI and Tesla was raised to solve the financing problem. According to OpenAI, Musk wanted full control of the company and this is where everything went wrong. The timing. Although he left the company in 2018, Musk does not sue OpenAI until 2024. During this time, OpenAI launched ChatGPT and ended up signing its great agreement with Microsoft. Apparently, this was what finally pissed off Musk, who accused OpenAI of having become a branch of Microsoft. Their objective was to annul the agreement, although much has happened since then. Today, OpenAI is the most valuable private company in the worldwith investments from giants such as NVIDIA, Amazon or Softbank. If Musk wins, his problem is no longer canceling the agreement with Microsoft, but something much more important: it puts at stake its planned IPO. A personal rivalry. Beyond the official accusations, Musk and Altman have a personal rivalry that has been brewing for years with countless public taunts and accusations. Musk has said that Altman is a liar and a scammer (He usually calls it ‘Scam Altman’) or that ChatGPT is a ‘woke’ AI. Altman has not been left behind; He has said that Musk is an idiot and even ridiculed him for the Tesla he bought and that was never deliveredgoing so far as to publish emails asking for a refund. In the trial, private details such as Elon Musk’s use of ketamine are expected to be aired, something that according to OpenAI is relevant since it portrays his mental state quite well. Let the show begin. Cover image | Village Global and Gage Skidmorevia Flickr In Xataka | MACROHARD is Elon Musk’s mockery of Microsoft: an AI agent that no other company can get. Still

forcing the same companies to comply with incompatible laws

The Chinese State Council has published two decrees which do not leave much room for interpretation: One on security of industrial supply chains, signed on March 31. And another on improper extraterritorial jurisdiction, published April 13. Together they form the most explicit legal arsenal the Chinese government has yet built to combat Western sanctions, and to warn foreign companies that choosing sides has consequences. Good or bad. Why is it important. For years, China has responded to pressures from across the Pacific with tools ad hoc and implicit signals. Now it does so by decree of the Council of State, the supreme executive body. It’s actually the same written strategy as before, but now black on white. The context. The first of the documents, known internally as Decree 834, is linked to the Chinese national security law and obliges ministries and local governments to identify, optimize and protect industrial supply chains considered strategic. The immediate trigger has been the war in Iran, which has interrupted the flow of sulfuric acidurea and other chemical inputs that China needs for its industry and agricultural sector. But the document comes from further afield: it is the culmination of decades of policy of self-sufficiency in resources, from rare earths to lithium. Between the lines. The most striking thing about Decree 834 is not what it regulates, but what it threatens. It includes explicit language about China’s right to investigate and take countermeasures against any foreign actor that “disrupts the normal functioning of markets” or imposes “discriminatory restrictions” on Chinese supply chains. The definition is broad on purpose. A Western company that pressures its government to sanction a Chinese competitor could find itself in the spotlight, as It already happened with Micron in 2023. The question. The second decree is even more direct. Their Regulations on Improper Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of Foreign Countries They say that if China considers foreign regulations that affect Chinese interests illegitimate, companies that comply with them are exposed to Chinese sanctions. Put another way: If the United States prohibits you from selling to China and China considers that prohibition “improper,” you will have to choose who you disobey. Possible sanctions include fines, bans on entry and exit from the territory, and export and import restrictions. The decree establishes a formal review mechanism: companies can ask the Chinese government for an exemption if they demonstrate that compliance with the foreign standard is unavoidable. This exemption can be granted or denied, which will turn the companies themselves into negotiating leverage between governments. Like Huawei in 2018. Yes, but. If a foreign government imposes a regulation that China does not want to abide by, it can announce that it is “improper,” wait for the affected companies to ask for an exemption, and use them as bargaining chips in diplomatic negotiations. It will happen because it is predictable and because that is where the incentives fit. The background. Since the 2018 trade war and semiconductor export controls, China has built a legal repertoire of response that includes Antitrust Lawthe List of Untrustworthy Entities and the Anti-Sanctions Law. These two new decrees do not open doors that no longer existed, but they do mark them with a neon sign. The message for foreign companies that do lobbying in the United States against Chinese competitors is crystal clear. Featured image | Xataka In Xataka | China has banned another AI startup from exporting talent and research: little by little, it is “nationalizing” AI

The best tech deals on Amazon for less than 50 euros today, April 28

April is coming to an end and if you are looking to renew or buy new technological devices for your home, Amazon is one of those stores where you can get very good deals. These are the best deals in technology for less than 50 euros that we found today, April 28, in this store. Tenda RX2L Pro – AX1500 WiFi 6 Router The price could vary. We earn commission from these links speaker system Logitech Z207 Bluetooth by 46.45 euros: with 3.5 mm input and 10 W of power. surveillance camera Reolink E1 Pro by 42.49 euros: Supports dual band WiFi. WiFi 6 router Tenda RX2L Pro by 29.99 euros: with WiFi 6 and five antennas. Smart humidifier Dreo by 49.99 euros– Compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant. wireless mouse Logitech Ergo M575S by 34.99 euros: with customizable buttons and trackball. Logitech Z207 Bluetooth Speaker System If you want to give your computer better sound, this Logitech Z207 Bluetooth speaker system is perfect now that it’s on sale. It has gone from costing 71.99 euros to 46.45 eurossince it has applied a 35% discount. This is a speaker system that you can pair to two Bluetooth devices or connect a device via the 3.5mm input. It pairs easily using the Bluetooth button and has an integrated headphone jack. The total power it offers is 10 W. Logitech Z207 Bluetooth PC Speaker System The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Reolink E1 Pro surveillance camera The time is approaching when getaways and departures from home are more continuous. If you are looking for a good option for have your home under control when you are awaythis Reolink surveillance camera is a good option. Its usual price is 49.99 euros, but now you can get it for 42.49 euros. This surveillance camera for indoors it offers a resolution of 2,880 x 1,616 pixels and is supports dual band WiFi. It has detection assisted by Artificial Intelligence and multiple storage options. Reolink E1 Pro 3K PT Indoor Camera The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Tenda RX2L Pro WiFi 6 Router If you want to have a good Internet connection at home, this Tenda RX2L Pro is a WiFi router that will come in handy. Its recommended price is 49.99 euros, but now it has a 40% discountbeing able to buy it for 29.99 euros. This router is equipped with WiFi 6 technology and offers dual-band speeds of up to 1,501 Mbps. It is equipped with five non-detachable antennas and technology beamformingwhich effectively improves signal transmission. Tenda RX2L Pro – AX1500 WiFi 6 Router The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Dreo Smart Humidifier It’s allergy time and maintain the best environment at home It is ideal to be able to cope with allergic rhinitis, for example, better at home. This one from Dreo has a recommended RRP of 59.99 euros, but now you can get it for 49.99 euros. This is a humidifier that you can control via app and voice commands, as it is compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa. It creates a mist three times larger than most humidifiers on the market and its four-liter tank offers up to 32 hours of mist. Dreo Smart Humidifier The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Logitech Ergo M575S Wireless Mouse With a 41% discountthis Logitech ergonomic mouse has gone from costing 58.99 euros (recommended RRP) to 34.99 euros. If there is something it stands out for, it is its cut shape, which keeps your hand relaxed for hours. From the firm they guarantee a 25% less muscle tension on the forearm using this mouse. In addition, it has three customizable buttons, so you can establish shortcuts that will save you time. Additionally, it comes with a wireless trackball. Logitech Ergo M575S wireless trackball mouse The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Logitech, Reolink, Dreame and Tenda In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | Best wireless headphones. Which one to buy and 21 models from 15 euros to 470 euros

It is not that Germany is promoting the four-day work day, it is that it is the country that works the fewest hours per year

In May 2025 and through the Eurostat dataa reality was confirmed that sometimes confuses a story: the myth that says that Germans work harder than Spaniards did not stand with figures in hand. The key, as we comment thenwas in the quality of the labor market: a good part of German workers work fewer hours per week in part-time jobs, but they did so for more years than Spanish workers. And now the OECD has arrived to put Germany in your place. Work identity crisis. Germany, traditionally associated with discipline and productivity, today faces a paradox: according to the OECDis the developed country where fewer hours worked per year, just 1,331 compared to the 1,898 of Greece or the 1,716 of Portugal. The situation represents a symbolic blow for a country that just a decade ago imposed austerity policies on southern countries, stigmatizing them as not being hard-working. The drop in workload is combined with a economic deterioration palpable: unemployment has exceeded three million people For the first time in a decade, the economy has contracted for two consecutive years and the GDP is already lower than in 2019, while Spain and Greece are growing at rapid rates. greater than 2%. The debate about work. we have been counting. The reduction in hours worked has become on central theme in German politics. Chancellor Friedrich Merz warns that four-day work weeks and an overemphasis on “life balance” will not sustain the country’s prosperity. The data they are striking: German workers enjoy longer vacations than the legal minimum, numerous holidays and an average of 19 sick leave a year, compared to 16 before the pandemic, a change that experts attribute more to culture than health. Scandals like that of a teacher on leave since 2009 receiving full salary have reinforced the perception that labor laxity is unsustainable. The roots of the phenomenon. They counted in the Washington Post that specialists maintain that it is not about laziness, but rather structural barriers. Almost half of German women work part-time, a figure that exceeds 65% in the case of mothers, which translates into one of the largest gaps in full-time equivalent employment in the entire EU. Historical factors also weigh in: in West Germany, working mothers were stigmatized like “crow mothers”while in the East, under the socialist model, full-time employment was promoted with daycare from an early age. Currently, cultural differences and a child care system with short hours persist that prevent many families from holding full-time jobs. Proposals and resistances. The experts match in which expanding daycare centers and extending their hours would be decisive, but technical solutions collide with politics. Changing the tax system from joint to individual filing could add the equivalent of half a million jobs full-time, but it is perceived as “anti-family” and difficult to approve. For their part, businessmen they claim less bureaucracy and more immigrationwhile some researchers advocate for simple reforms that free up hidden work hours. However, government responses have been considered timid and insufficient, and the feeling of postponement persists. The four-day elephant. Paradoxically, while political leaders call for more work, more and more companies are experimenting with shorter work weeks. In 2024, 45 companies will test the four day week with equal salaries and reduced hours, with positive results: higher productivity per hour and more satisfied employees. The majority of these firms plan to maintain the model, consolidating the trend in favor of free time. Thus, Germany moves between two poles: a productive system that suffers stagnation and pressure to lengthen working hours, and a society that increasingly values ​​life outside of work, drawing a clash of visions that puts not only the economy, but the identity of the country at stake. Image | International Tr In Xataka | Germany seeks a revolutionary change in its labor system: making working more hours profitable In Xataka | Germany tried working four days a week: seven out of 10 companies no longer want to work five days a week A version of this article was originally published in September 2025

Athletics has just experienced its own “moon landing.” And Adidas has defeated Nike in its particular space race

May 6, 2017. Eliud Kipchoge appears on the finish line of the Monza circuit, northern Italy. This time the sound of the engines is provided by the crash against the asphalt of the athletes who accompany the Kenyan in the breaking 2the first attempt to go under two hours in marathon distance. But it is the tires that attract attention. The feet fit the Nike Vaporfly Elite. A very high profile, a foam with an absorption capacity unlike anything seen before. And the most striking thing: a carbon plate. The promise is that the shoe saves energy when running. That is, fatigue comes later and/or the athlete can run faster with the same feeling of effort. Almost a decade ago, Eliud Kipchoge was a handful of seconds away from breaking the two-hour marathon distance. He breaking 2 It did not break the desired 120-minute barrier, but Nike had just opened a new page in the history of athletics. A space race began that has ended almost nine years after that challenge. On April 26, 2026, the moon was reached. But Adidas has put the flag. A photo for history Since 2017 we have been wondering who would be the first man to break under two hours in a conventional marathon. Eliud Kipchoge himself achieved it the following year, becoming the first to complete the 42,195 meters in less than 120 minutes. But the event, surrounded by hares, with a car making a screen to block the wind and with mobile supplies, could not be validated as a world record. In 2018, in the Berlin marathon, considered one of the circuits faster of the world, Eliud Kipchoge amazed by stopping the clock at 2:01’39”. The following year, the legendary Kenenisa Bekele was just two seconds away from that same record in one of the cruelest final stretches in history. At that time, records were already falling in pairs with the new Nike carbon plate. Athletes were breaking records at the same rate as complaints of technological doping were rising. Some, in fact, They broke contracts when they understood that they were playing at a disadvantage. With the world’s fastest man in the long distance 99 seconds away from breaking the two-hour barrier, the question of whether we would ever see this milestone was more than repeated. In 2022, Kipchoge managed to get closer and made us dream. He finally exceeded it by one minute and nine seconds. On April 26, 2026, Sabastian Sawe put the flag on the Moon. And Yomif Kejelcha propped it up. Adidas had won the space race with a photo that will go down in history. Since Nike revolutionized the market with the launch of the first Vaporfly, athletics brands went into combustion. Sneakers with carbon plates multiplied, foams softened and became more reactive. The competition arrived and Nike seemed to have fallen behind. Kelvin Kiptum in 2023 proved that we were wrong, that he was the main candidate to break the mythical barrier. He was 35 seconds away from achieving it in the Chicago Marathon but a car accident ended his life a few months later. A few months earlier, Tigst Assefa stopped the clock in a historic 2:11’53” in the Berlin Marathon. He had just shaved almost two minutes off the world record. On his feet, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro EVO 1. The Nike-Adidas battle is on fire and in 2024 Ruth Chepngetich, dressed by Nike, becomes the first woman in history to beat 2 hours and 10 minutes. The following year, Chepngetich is sanctioned for doping but it does not affect this record. This same year in Barcelona, Fotyen Tesfay manages to go under two hours and 11 minutes and Adidas also already has the second fastest mark in the history of the women’s marathon. But the final blow was given yesterday. Only two men have gone under two hours in a conventional marathon. They both wear Adidas. From the Vaporfly to the Adizero Adios Pro EVO 3 When Nike first released the Vaporfly, all hell broke loose. Not only among the more or less amateur public, athletes verified on the spot that their shoes were not up to par with those of the Oregon brand. Until its arrival, competition shoes had been standardized in minimal profiles and low drop (the difference in height between the front and rear area). The Vaporfly blew up what was known until then. Impossible heights for the time, very soft foams and zero “feel” of the asphalt for feet accustomed to always being close to the ground. However, for some reason, they worked. The improvement was quickly attributed to the carbon plate but the plate is only one of the pieces that make the whole work. Although it was directly attributed to the plate, the truth is that that sensation of “catapult” and extreme rebound of the foot was the result of using a supercritical foam with a lot of return. In fact, the carbon served to structure the shoe and give stability to the foot. Javi Moro, head of material at the magazine Corridorexplains that these foams “are very light and have a great capacity to retain and return energy” but emphasizes that they really have not changed much in general. “They have changed the curvatures of the plate and the midsoles to generate more rocker effect,” he explains, although he emphasizes that it is more as a means to adapt to all types of audiences “because not all runners tolerate the same type of plate in the same way.” This swing is more pronounced as brands have sought the limits of the regulations. World Athletic, which organizes major events and certifies the tests and the validity of the results, prevents competition with shoes whose height between the ground and the support of the insole exceeds 40 mm. But brands play with “where” those measurements are taken (at two specific points, heel and midfoot) to play with the geometries and try to put more foam … Read more

The problem is that China has taken note

In the middle of World War II, several neutral merchant ships crossing the Atlantic were intercepted and diverted to British ports without being sunk, where specialized judges They decided their destiny weeks later. That almost bureaucratic process converted each capture in a legal matter as well as military. The return of a buried law. Last week we count how the capture of the ship M/V Touska by the United States in the Gulf of Oman, an action that has returned to the foreground a legal tool that had been out of the real debate for decades: the right of prey. This mechanism allows intercepting and, if is legally validatedappropriating civilian ships in the context of war, something that had not been applied in a relevant way since the mid-20th century. The operation is not limited to a specific military action, it introduces a change in how control over maritime trade can be exercised in an open conflict. What it really means. This legal framework is activated only in war situations and establishes that a ship can be captured if you violate a locktransports material useful to the enemy or refuses to be inspected. After capture, the ship is taken to a port under the control of the captor and subjected to a specific judicial process. Finally, if the court considers that the seizure is legitimate, the ship and its cargo pass into the hands of the State that intercepted it, turning a naval operation into a tool with direct economic consequences. How it was used in the past. During World War II, these types of regulations were part from normal operation of naval warfare. The powers involved intercepted merchant ships on the high seas to prevent supply to the enemyespecially on strategic Atlantic routes. Many of these ships were taken to controlled ports and subjected to prize courts, which decided whether they should be confiscated, released or destroyed. The system allowed the opponent to be weakened no need to sink all ships, integrating the legal dimension into military strategy. The British ship HMS Blanche towing the French frigate Pique, after having captured it Aiming beyond Iran. It happens, chow we explainthat the case of Touska acquires greater relevance due to its journey and its connections. Your route from Asia to Iranwith stops in Chinese ports, has introduced a third actor into the equation, elevating the significance of the capture. In fact and as trump hintedthe possibility that it was transporting material linked to China has turned the operation into a broader message about controlling trade routes in a war environment, where each interception can have additional diplomatic implications. From blocking to economic tool. Applying this framework not only allows stopping traffic to a country, it also opens the door to appropriate resources that circulate in that system. This introduces an additional incentive into naval warfare and modifies the behavior of external actors. Who is it? From shipping companies, to insurers and states that operate on these routes, they must recalculate risks, which can translate in route changesincreased costs and greater uncertainty in international trade. Notice to sailors. There is no doubt, the immediate impact extends beyond the captured ship. The possibility of losing an entire ship, along with its cargo, changes perception of risk for operators who until now moved in a more predictable terrain. Countries that offer flags of convenience or companies that work in gray areas may find themselves dragged into complex legal processeswhich adds pressure to avoid any links to routes or destinations under blockage. The boomerang effect. Not only that. He United States movement It introduces a dynamic that it does not completely control, because by recovering this doctrine, it establishes a precedent that other actors can use in future scenarios. Here are names of powers with great maritime and commercial capacity, like chinawhich have the necessary volume to apply similar measures if the context allows it. This opens a new potential front where the maritime interdiction It can escalate beyond a regional conflict. The sea as a battlefield. Ultimately, the Touska case marks something deeper than the capture of a single vessel. It signals a possible transition towards a model where naval warfare combines military force and legal tools of the past to influence global trade. In that scenario where “pirate” jargon seems have a revivaleach operation is no longer isolated and becomes part of a chain of decisions that can be replicated in different parts of the planet, expanding the scope of conflicts and giving a twist to what was understood by the rules of the game at sea. Image | NAVCENT Public Affairs, Robert Dodd In Xataka | Now we know that the Iranian Air Force did to the US what Ukraine could not do to Russia with drones: an abysmal hole In Xataka | If the war resumes again, the US runs a risk unprecedented in the history of war: that the only one with missiles will be Iran.

Where is really the limit of the human being?

April 26, 2026 will go down in history: Sabastian Sawe won the London marathon and became the first human being to go under two hours in an approved race. What’s more, in that same race Yomif Kejelcha and Jacob Kiplimo They also had better times than the previous world record (although only Sawe and Kejelcha went under two hours). Therefore, the key question is no longer When will we be able to get under two hours in the marathon? and it will start to be “where is the physiological limit of the human body really?” The question is essential, yes; but we cannot approach it naively. There are two factors without which Sawe would not have been able to achieve the record: the sneakers (which, although they are from Adidas, are part of the revolution that promoted Nike a few years ago) and nutrition (worked with Swedish nutrition specialists Maurten for 12 months to design a specific provisioning protocol). If the contemporary quest to break the two-hour mark has shown anything, it is that running goes far beyond a physiological issue. What variables rule in the physiological section? Since 1991, the physiology of the marathon is usually understood following a simple model that said Michael Joyner of the Mayo Clinic.. According to Joyner, sustained marathon pace depends on three variables: The maximum amount of oxygen that the body can absorb per minute. The maximum amount you can sustain for hours without accumulating lactate faster than it is eliminated. The energy cost of maintaining a given speed. Joyner, who lived in a world where the record was 2:06:50, theorized that the limit It should have been around 1:57:58. That’s not enough. Years later, Andy Jones from the University of Exeter added one more factor: physiological resilience. That is, the ability for these three variables to deteriorate as little as possible during two hours of racing. For this reason, shoes and supplies are essential: They are two tools that improve efficiency and resilience. In fact, many experts maintain that the 2016 revolution is a break in the series and the records are “technological, not physiological“. This is important because, using models of the Joyner variables, we can make conjectures of the physiological limit “as long as the same technological conditions are maintained.” And what is the limit right now? Following the real values ​​of the Breaking2 projectsubtracting resilience and considering technological and nutritional improvements, the realistic limit would be between 1:55 and 1:57. Below 1:55 we would need an athlete with physiological capabilities that we have not seen yet. It’s not impossible, but it’s very unlikely. Image | Miguel Amutio In Xataka | More and more people participate in popular marathons. Science knows that being overly optimistic has its risks

It’s Sandisk and it has accumulated 3,000%

The thing about Sandisk growth on the stock market It is to study it carefully. Has accumulated almost 3,000% revaluation in the last year, and is another example of how the AI ​​fever and RAM crisis They are shaping the technology industry and markets. And the company that many of us have known for its USB pendrives and memory cards has become one of the companies that will be the most talked about in 2026. lseparation from Western Digital. In February 2025, Sandisk completed its separation from Western Digital and began trading independently on the Nasdaq. For almost a decade, the company had been buried under the umbrella of its parent company, tied to a conventional hard drive business that was growing slowly while the AI ​​sector accelerated and gave wings to the rest of the companies that made critical components for data centers. At the time of going on the market as an independent company, the stock started at around $48. Nothing strange so far. AI once again plays its role in the market. Actually, Sandisk has not invented anything revolutionary now, but everything has to do with the data center storage demand. The flash memory manufacturing company Kioxia warned last January that its supply of NAND for this entire year was already exhausted. And these types of stories are what make companies start looking at alternatives. Data centers dedicated to AI need to store gigantic volumes of data to train models and infer results. When they ran out of traditional hard drives (HDDs), they turned to SSD. And when SSDs also became scarce, prices skyrocketed. According to Kingstonanother manufacturer of flash memory products, NAND prices increased by 246% throughout 2025. Sandisk, being one of the world’s leading manufacturers of NAND memory, found itself at the center of this perfect storm, and in the best possible position. 3,000%. Sandisk’s revenue in the fiscal second quarter of 2026 reached 3,030 million dollarsa growth of 61% year-on-year, while earnings per share multiplied by more than five compared to the same period of the previous year. Revenue from data centers grew 76% year over year in that same quarter, according to the company’s own results filed with the SEC. The company has publicly acknowledged that its factories are working at full capacity. In this way, the accumulated value of its shares has skyrocketed by more than 3,000%, going from just $30 to surpassing the $1,000 barrier in just over a year. The key is in Kioxia. A fundamental part of Sandisk’s competitive advantage is its historic alliance with Japan’s Kioxia, formerly Toshiba Memory. This joint venture of more than twenty years allows them to share the astronomical costs of manufacturing chips, which translates into margins higher than those of most of their rivals. In this way, as we already explained At the end of January, when NAND prices rise, Sandisk does not need to invest in new factories to earn much more, as the additional revenue falls directly into the profit margin. It’s the equivalent of almost free money in a bull market. The data center segment currently represents more than 55% of sales quarterly from Sandisk, compared to the 30% it represented before the split with WD. The entry to the Nasdaq-100. A few days ago, Sandisk joined the Nasdaq-100 indexwhich mechanically forces all ETFs and index funds that track that index to buy shares of the company. This carryover effect has given Sandisk an additional boost to its already flying stock. And now what? The big question is how long this can last. NAND prices they have risen 60% in the first quarter of 2026, with forecasts for another 70-75% increase in the coming months. The CEO of Micron has already publicly declared that the memory shortage will last until 2027. As shared by Ind Money, several analysis firms assure that the crisis could extend until 2028. We will see. As for companies like Samsung, SK Hynix and Kioxia, the triad of memory companies, they plan to significantly increase your production in the coming years in response to the shortage. Cover image | sandisk In Xataka | China has banned another AI startup from exporting talent and research: little by little, it is “nationalizing” AI

Google says that 75% of its new code already comes from machines

What if much of the software we use every day was already beginning to be written in a different way? AI has been entering programming for some time through the door of the assistants, code suggestions and small automations, but what is beginning to be seen now goes much further. The question is no longer just whether these systems help to write faster, but what happens when a large technology company decides to rely on them systematically. Google has given a pretty clear clue as to where that transition is going. Google’s jump. The figure was put on the table by Sundar Pichai in a blog post linked to Cloud Next 2026. According to Google’s CEO, the company has been using AI to generate code internally for some time and today 75% of all new code is already generated by AI and approved by engineers. The jump is not minor: last fall, that percentage was 50%. In just a few months, Google has gone from already very high usage to placing AI at the center of much of its software production. Precision matters. That nuance is not minor: generated by AI does not mean accepted without human control. Pichai talks about code generated by these systems, but also approved by engineers, a necessary difference to not oversize the data. Richard Seroter, Senior Director, Google Cloud, He explained it to Fast Company noting that that human approval is “fundamental in this area.” Google’s reading is that AI can take on an increasing part of production, but within a flow in which engineers continue to validate, correct and make decisions. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google Google’s internal turn. Pichai did not present this advance as a simple productivity improvement, but as part of a shift towards “truly agentive” workflows. As he explained, Google engineers are orchestrating autonomous digital teams, launching agents to complete tasks that previously depended much more on direct human work. The example he cited helps measure the scope of that transition: A complex code migration, performed by agents and engineers, was completed six times faster than was possible just a year ago with engineers working alone. The engineer changes places. Google’s thesis is not that the programmer disappears, but that their work is displaced. Seroter explained to Fast Company that, with this new distribution of tasks, engineers can focus on higher-value tasks: systems architecture, design and solving complex problems. In this new distribution, manual code writing loses part of its weight and the ability to direct, review and convert those pieces into real products gains importance. The contrast with the rest of the sector. A Sonar survey from earlier this year notes that 96% of developers acknowledge that they do not fully trust AI-generated code, and that 52% do not always review it for errors before incorporating it. At the same time, the weight of these tools is growing very quickly: the code generated by AI would have gone from 6% in 2023 to 42% in the latest report, with a forecast of 65% for 2027. So we have reasons to say that adoption is ahead of trust. Images | Xataka with Grok | Stanford Graduate School of Business In Xataka | A young man has solved a mathematical problem that lasted 60 years in 80 minutes with ChatGPT. That’s the least interesting thing about the story.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.