Silicon-carbon seems to be the holy grail in batteries. I have spoken to an Honor engineer to verify this

For years, smartphones have been asked for something that didn’t seem so complicated: that their battery last more than two days. It turns out that it was complicated, and that manufacturers have had to wait for the only technology that, for the moment, makes this possible to mature. This technology is the silicon-carbonand companies like Honor were pioneers in its implementation in commercial phones. He Honor Magic5 Prolaunched in 2023, was the first high-end smartphone to incorporate it. Three years later, the industry trend leaves no room for doubt: –this is the way– that is the way. After the launch of Honor 600at Xataka we have had the opportunity to speak with Lun Lu, one of the engineers in Honor’s battery department. And yes, he told us little things. Just because One of the greatest limitations of the human being has to do with the “what ifs”, followed by a negative consequence. In the case of silicon-carbon batteries, no manufacturer dared to implement them commercially. Until Honor decided to accompany her “what if…” with a positive consequence. I ask Lu when it was clear to them, when they knew it was the right time to make the jump to silicon-carbon. He tells me that a year before, in 2021, they felt that they were ready and were clear that the technology was mature. They began to allocate resources to design the architecture and start talking to their partners for mass production. This is precisely one of the keys that makes the process so slow. The chemistry of these batteriesthe changes that need to be made at the design level, the security measures that its implementation requires… it is a slow and delicate engineering process. And this answers my question why do you think that some of the Western manufacturers (Apple, Google) They are not yet on the boat. But… what exactly are we talking about? We are clear that Honor was the pioneer in introducing silicon-carbon but… what exactly are we talking about? How could we explain to someone who has no idea about technology what these types of batteries are and what they provide? Lu explains it without any complications: we are facing a great advance through which we can introduce batteries with much more energy in the same size. In other words, where certain mAh used to fit, now many more fit. Much more lithium per gram can be stored in silicon-carbon batteries than in traditional batteries, up to ten times more on a theoretical level. In the new Honor 600, without going any further, they have introduced a 6,400mAh battery in a body of only 7.8mm. It is much thinner than most of its direct rivals with 5,000mAh batteries, and in our analysis it has reached three days of use. Yes, but If the path to silicon-carbon was only surrounded by flowers, there would be no doubts about its implementation. But everything has fine print. We asked about the biggest challenges when implementing this technology. And the answer is clear: your safety, without room for discussion. Introducing silicon greatly complicates the internal stability of the cell, since its volumetric expansion when absorbing lithium ions is considerable and The fear of possible fans is present in the industry. Zhua says that designing this type of battery is a challenge, but that the department takes into account each of the limitations and possible problems of this technology with a view to the long term, since Honor knows that the trend in the industry is towards maintaining the same mobile phone for a few years. Another fairly recurring doubt with these batteries has to do with the cycles they support. In recent years, one of the obsessions has been to ensure that traditional batteries do not degrade excessively. after 1,000 cycles (about what we would do in a couple of years of heavy use). Although he does not reveal all his secrets, Lu says that Honor has been researching for years how to alleviate the early degradation of silicon-carbon, optimizing manufacturing processes to keep them to a minimum. The E1 and E2 chips, implemented in the Magic family and responsible for energy management (co-processors that accompany the main CPU), are responsible for controlling charging and discharging in real time, adjusting consumption according to temperature, voltage and use, and trying to improve cold performance. The last big limitation has to do with what Lu considers “a big problem,” and answers my question of how a manufacturer like Honor deals with having to make a device with one battery destined for China and another destined for Europe. The European Union has strict controls and restrictions with battery imports, and this is slowing down the advances that China is developing. “We would like to provide batteries with the most advanced technology and the highest energy density all over the world, but regulations cannot be discussed. What we can do right now is somewhat limited, because regulations are a red line that we cannot cross.” From the bar counter The phone battery is one of the components most subject to bar counter conversations. “Fast charging is bad.” “It is better to charge up to 80%.” “Silicon carbon batteries have almost no silicon.” Claims that are sometimes made without knowing the scientific support that supports them (or not). So I take the opportunity to ask Lu about some recurring myths and the direction in which these batteries are going. To the first question, it makes it quite clear to me that today there is no difference between charge quickly and charge slowly. There is some truth to the myth: uncontrolled fast charging is harmful, but current battery and charger design takes this issue into account. Regarding the famous 80-20% ruleit is something totally proven. There is no problem in charging to 100%, but keeping the battery in this range helps to extend its useful life. It is risky to give specific information on how many cycles we can gain, since it will depend on … Read more

from futuristic city to the great logistical shortcut that eludes Hormuz

In 1869, when it was inaugurated the Suez Canala long caravan of boats crossed for the first time an artificial pass that changed trade routes millennia in a matter of days, not months. What seemed like an almost utopian work ended up demonstrating that, when a strategic route is transformed, the entire balance of world trade can revolve around it. The map changes with a closure. He closure of the strait of Hormuz during the war with Iran has shown to what extent a relatively small strip of water can disrupt global trade. In fact, the Gulf Countries have been forced to improvise alternative routes to maintain the flow of goods and energy. Saudi Arabia, although less affected than other neighbors, has had to quickly reconfigure your logistics network. The result is that this kind of global shock has accelerated decisions that had been on the table for years and has changed strategic priorities. Neom comes down to earth. Yes, the futuristic megaproject and increasingly utopian of Neom, conceived as a fantastic vision with developments like The Lineit seems that it has entered a much more pragmatic phase. As we have been saying, the extra costs and the economic pressure have forced us to cut back on ambitions and focus on projects that generate tangible value. And in that turn, the neom port and the industrial city by Oxagon They have gained prominence. As? The logic has shifted towards what can be built, financed and operationalized within a realistic economic framework. The great shortcut: avoiding Hormuz from the Red Sea. The war has given immediate meaning to this reconversion. counted the financial times this morning that the port of Neom is positioning itself as an alternative door which connects Europe, Africa and the Gulf without passing through Hormuz. From that perspective, goods travel from Europe to the Mediterranean, cross Egypt and reach the Red Sea to redeploy to the Gulf by sea and land. This route, already in use by several European countries, has become more relevant as the strait was blocked. Neom Under construction… but already operational. Although the project is still in development, the port is already working and shows signs of activity growing. In fact, satellite images they have captured traffic of trucks and operations at the site, while infrastructure such as automated cranes, container terminals and sustainable energy systems are completed. The ambition is to turn it into an electrical porthighly automated and prepared for large vessels. All of this currently places it as an emerging piece within the Saudi logistics network. The turn to the west: the economy moves towards the Red Sea. Because the crisis has accelerated a structural change in Saudi Arabia. The economic weight, traditionally concentrated on the Gulf coast, begins to shift towards the red sea. Infrastructure such as the east-west pipeline and the port of Yanbu have gained importancewhile exports increase from that facade. The problem: that although the movement reduces vulnerability to Iran, it also introduces new risks in other areas. Beyond Neom: a network of routes to resist. Yes, because the momentum is not limited to a single project. Apparently, the Times said that Saudi Arabia and its neighbors are already developing logistics corridors, combining ports, roads and future rail connections. Multimodal routes connecting the Gulf with the Red Sea and other markets are also being integrated. The objective seems clear: create redundancy in supply chains to avoid depending on a single strategic step. From science fiction to real geopolitics. In this context, the scenario that is being glimpsed indicates that Neom stops being just a futuristic and hyperbolic symbol and becomes a whole a strategic tool. The war has acted as a catalyst, transforming an ambitious and possibly utopian vision into a practical solution for an immediate problem. There is no doubt, the project was not originally designed to avoid Hormuz by any means, but now it fits perfectly into that role. And in that change it is summarized the new reality: When routes fail, it is possible that even the most futuristic ideas may end up being necessary. Image | NEOM In Xataka | NEOM may have failed, but Saudi Arabia still has crazy things in its hat: a huge artificial lake at 2,600 meters In Xataka | While NEOM builds ski slopes in the desert, Dubai is going in the opposite direction: attracting tourism without going bankrupt

from the characters to the most iconic ships

Today, May 4, is Star Wars Day for the “May the 4th be with you“, and like every year the stores have launched offers on a good number of Lego sets. If you want to take advantage of this day so marked by fans of the franchise, we are going to review the best constructions that we can find right now, always taking into account that they are on sale at a good price. Logo by 52.49 eurosone of the best Star Wars sets to decorate a shelf. Grogu in air cradle by 74.99 eurosthe adorable character from ‘The Mandalorian’ along with the aerocradle from the first seasons. R2-D2 by 68.99 eurosone of the character sets with the best quality-price ratio. AT-ST Walker by 149.99 eurosa very well detailed construction of the Empire’s fighting machine. Millennium Falcon by 62.99 eurosone of the Han Solo ship sets with the best quality-price ratio. Millennium Falcon (75375) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Logo The logo is one of the most characteristic elements of Star Wars and Lego launched its own construction set a while ago. It is quite large (13 cm high, 30 cm wide and 3 cm deep) and its design is very well cared for. The set consists of a total of 700 pieces and inside comes with a nod to the saga. Its price in El Corte Inglés is 52.49 euros instead of 69.99 euros. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Grogu in air cradle If you liked it’The Mandalorian‘, especially the first seasons, Lego has a set of Grogu who comes with his own air cradle. The character can be placed in the crib or both builds placed on a separate shelf, includes a total of 1,048 pieces and comes along with accessories, a Grogu minifigure and a nameplate with information about the character. Its price in El Corte Inglés is 74.99 euros instead of 99.99 euros. Grogu in air cradle (75403) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links R2-D2 If we talk about mythical characters, R2-D2 is one of them. To date, it has had several Lego sets and the one Amazon has for 68.99 euros (before 99.99 euros) is one of those with the best quality-price ratio. It is basically because it has a good level of detail, it is a large set with a height of 24 cm and comes with both a minifigure of the character and an identification plate with information about it. In this case, the set consists of 1,050 pieces. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links AT-ST Walker Perhaps they do not have a similar relevance to that which certain ships or characters have had, but the AT-ST Walker It is one of the most popular combat machines in the saga. By 149.99 euros In El Corte Inglés (previously 199.99 euros), we are talking about a set with 1,513 pieces and a considerable size, with a height of 37 cm. The construction is very well detailed, you can open the top to see the cockpit and it comes with a pilot minifigure and an identification plate with information. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Millennium Falcon He Millennium Falcon It is the most iconic ship in the entire saga, and it is not surprising because we have seen it countless times. It also has several sets, but the Lego that Amazon has for 62.99 euros It is one of the most balanced in terms of price and quality. The construction consists of a total of 921 pieces, despite its price it is very well detailed (it even includes the cabin, rear engine and cannons) and comes with both a support and two plates: one identifying and another for the 25-year anniversary. Millennium Falcon (75375) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Lego, Star Wars In Xataka | Your favorite series, comics and movies also in LEGO: 15 construction kits ideal to assemble yourself or give as a gift In Xataka | There is a LEGO Star Wars set that I would buy again without thinking twice. It’s wonderful and it’s not expensive.

Salmon have never taken so long to reach Asturias. And yes, it is as worrying as it seems

14 days. That is, two weeks after the season opened, we are still waiting for the capture of the ‘campanu’the first salmon to be traced by any of the five Asturian salmon farms. Whatever appears when it appears, it will be the latest campaign in history. No one is surprised that the Ministry have requested an expert report to decide whether to classify the species as “endangered.” What has happened? On Saturday, April 18, 2026, two weeks later than the traditional date, the season opened. The counseling deliberately delayed the start to “accumulate more salmon entries” (in the same way that reduced the number of specimens that can be caught to 154): after all, last year only 472 specimens were detected in the entire Principality. And the problem is not only Asturian. In Cantabria (where 38 salmon can be caught) none have been caught either. Although it must be pointed out that in the Cantabrian rivers the ban opened this May 1st. And in Galicia a total ban was declared for 2026 (although some exceptions have been made). Why is all this happening? The causes are well known: we are talking about things like river fragmentation, pollution (agricultural, industrial and urban), the effects of aquacultureuncontrolled repopulation, invasive species and, of course, climate change. So, are we going towards a total ban? The truth is that no one can know. Especially because we have a very close precedent: Spain has repeatedly refused to ban eel fishing despite the fact that all scientific reports say that it must be done. In favor of the salmon it plays that, thanks to the farms, the money that the wild moves is rather symbolic. But the paths of agricultural regulation in an election year are inscrutable. What is clear is that these are not good times for wild salmon. Not in Spain, not anywhere. In Norway, for example, only 323,000 wild salmon were observed in 2024. The previous year, the figures They amounted to 481,463 copies. In Scotland, another of the great salmon-growing countries, the population of wild specimens has fallen by 80% since the 70s; and, in the Faroes, the total ban is on the table. As we said recently, there have never been more salmon in the world. And, for that reason, this species has never been closer to disappearing in the wild. Image | Brandon In Xataka | We are drugging the salmon with cocaine and anxiolytics. And that’s causing them to behave strangely.

They came to believe that the horoscope predicted true love. It was actually a bug in the 2001 British census.

When searching a new lovethere are many people who are looking for the best possible compatibility, but not only in terms of tastes or hobbies, but also to the zodiac sign that corresponds to each of the people. Nowadays there are dating applications that allow you to filter by zodiac sign, since it is not uncommon to see or hear that being a Leo or Scorpio sign is something catastrophic. But science has something to say here. Demonstrating it. When asked if the zodiac sign affects the compatibility that exists in a couple, researcher David Voas wanted to give him an answer to see if it is a definitive tool or not. And to do so, he analyzed a sample of 20 million people from the census of England and Wales, which is equivalent to 10 million couples. This way, if there is any relationship in such a large sample, it has to be seen somehow. And here we didn’t want to see if the fire signs get along with each other, but rather something more basic: is there any combination of signs that occurs more or less frequently than pure chance dictates? The first results. At first glance at the different couples analyzed, it seemed that the astrologers were right and that people were grouped according to the affinity of their zodiac signs. But the truth is that the researcher did not stop at this and continued digging into the data in order to see if there was something more. The real results. Upon further investigation, he discovered that this “astrological sign” did not come from the cosmos, but from imputation errors and biases in the collection of census data. Here he observed that in records where the exact day of birth was missing, officials used to assume that it was the 1st day of the month by default, which generated artificial accumulations of people in certain signs and created patterns that were not real. With all this, it was seen that many apparently compatible couples were simply sharing registration errors or rounded birth dates, which is something quite common within the administration. And once these statistical artifacts were corrected and matches by birth month were separated from matches that actually crossed the boundary between zodiac signs, the effect disappeared completely. In short, there was no trace of a “force” that united the signs. It’s always the same. This new research sits in a long tradition of scientific attempts to validate astrology in some way, and the truth is that it always comes to the same conclusion: there is no relationship. As Carlos Orsi explains in his work published by Columbia University Press, the problem with couple astrology is that not even astrologers themselves agree, since there is no homogeneous theory about which combinations are “good.” And given this lack of consensus, the Voas test is the fairest possible: look for any deviation from chance. And chance won by a landslide. Images | lookstudio in Magnific freepik In Xataka | Esperanza Gracia had been explaining the horoscope to the Spanish for three decades. Its closure illustrates a deeper change

Murcians and Castilian-La Mancha have been fighting for nothing for years. Whatever happens with the transfer, what we are really losing is time

Ultimately, this is the story of a deception. Since 2019, the Supreme Court has been saying exactly the same thing: the application of the European Water Framework Directive forces Spain to change the way it manages its transfers. And he hasn’t said it once, no: if we talk about the transfer of the Tagushe has said it, at least, six times. Despite this, the different administrations have been interpreting a political melodrama for years that has prevented the design of a system that minimizes the problems that the directive may create. And the result is that Murcians and Castilian-La Mancha They have been fighting for nothing for years. Fortunately or unfortunately, this race forward seems to end on May 5. What happens on May 5? If everything goes as planned, on May 5 the Supreme Court will decide the future of the Tajo-Segura Transfer and the Tajo Hydrological Plan 2022-2027. That day, the high court will decide what happens to the appeal of the Central Union of Irrigators of the Tajo-Segura Aqueductthe last major judicial process that remains open against the changes that the Government approved in 2025 to adapt to the regulations. It is, so to speak, the last legal bullet left for the irrigators of the eastern peninsula. And what can we expect? Bit. The president of the union himself, Lucas Jiménez, has publicly admitted ‘cold spirits’ and ‘without great expectations’, given the meaning of previous pronouncements. And at this point, the issue being debated is whether the new ecological flows (which, according to the University of Alicante, will entail an average loss of 105 hm³/year from 2027) come into force now or may be staggered. But, the unpopularity of the measure in large areas of the country has caused everything to be postponed. To the point that the National Court just admitted to processing Castilla-La Mancha’s appeal for the Ministry’s inaction in publishing the new rules: in fact, if Scrats’ appeal is overturned tomorrow, there will be no rules to apply the transfer. And then? The conflict will enter a new phase: given the eventual rejection and with the transfer cuts legally consolidated, all that remains is to discuss technical details and compensation measures. We must not forget that the Transfer supplies almost 150,000 hectares irrigation in Murcia, Alicante and Almería. This is water that is already de facto granted to irrigators and the State will have to compensate them. Although, of the 1,450 million euros that Moncloa committed to cushion the blow, it seems that only around 5% has been executed. The story that never ends. We have been fighting over water in Spain for decades and we have been unable to create a system that reorganizes the country (and adapts it to real water). Almost the opposite: for more than 30 years, it has never been like this. As explained in Datadista“since the deep drought of the 1990s, each dry period has served to implement emergency measures (…) or allow practices that were not eliminated when the rains returned, they were used to expand irrigation, increasing the problem of overexploitation and contamination of aquifers and the wetlands they feed.” And the bill for all that is what we are paying now. Image | Trent Haddock In Xataka | The Tagus reservoirs have reached their maximum level. The response of the authorities has been to empty them immediately

US sanctions have left its current market share at 0%

In just two years Nvidia has gone from leading the GPU market to artificial intelligence (IA) in China to not sell practically anything in this country. In fact, Jensen Huang, the CEO of this company, has confirmed just a few hours ago now Its market share in this Asian nation is 0%. This dramatic scenario for Nvidia is the result of two decisive strategies of the governments of China and the United States. Early October 2024 the Chinese Administration sent to its AI companies a recommendation asking them to use chips produced in China as much as possible. Ten months later this recommendation became a requirement. And the Chinese Government is already forcing state-owned data centers throughout the country to use at least 50% Chinese integrated circuits in their servers. The Administration led by Xi Jinping has made this decision because it can afford it. And it is that It already has three very clear alternatives to Nvidia: Cambricon Technologies, Huawei and Moore Threads. This panorama has led Jensen Huang to decide to openly criticize the US export policy. AND has done it on several occasions during the last few years. The head of Nvidia is not enough to be the most attractive option for his Chinese customers; It also has to deal with the decisions of the US Government. US sanctions on China are destroying Nvidia Jensen Huang holds that the US will not protect its technological hegemony by blocking AI chip exports; According to this executive, what Donald Trump’s Government must do is ensure that the American AI ecosystem is dominant worldwide. The current scenario proves him right, but at the moment nothing indicates that the US Administration is going to bet on its strategy. At least not in a consistent way from a practical point of view. And the US Department of Commerce does not give the slightest respite to American AI chip designers. When these companies receive an order from one of their Chinese clients must apply for an export license to this government entity and indicate which GPU they intend to send to China, their specifications and which client is going to use them, among other relevant information. The Office of Industry and Security is also responsible for carrying out investigations into the tariffs deployed by the Administration led by Donald Trump. Once the bureaucracy has been put in place, Department of Commerce technicians analyze export applications in the framework established by current regulation and approve or deny the sale of integrated circuits to China. This is the usual procedure, so there is nothing new up to this point. However, Nvidia, AMD and other American AI chip designers face a very serious problem: the Commerce Department takes several months to process their export licenses. The staffing of the Department of Commerce has been drastically reduced in recent months, and in the current context this scenario represents a very serious problem. The Industry and Security Office of this entity is not only responsible for processing export licenses linked to AI chips; is also responsible for carrying out tariff investigations deployed by the Administration led by Donald Trump. And with fewer personnel than in 2024 and 2025 it cannot cope. According to Bloombergthe Office of Industry and Security has lost 101 employees in recent months, which represents a 19% reduction in staff compared to what it had in 2024. Curiously, the staff specifically dedicated to developing standards linked to the semiconductor industry and reviewing applications for export licenses has decreased by 20%, although at the moment it has not emerged what is the reason for this staff drain. Be that as it may, during 2025 the Office of Industry and Security took an average of 76 days to resolve export requests, but this period is increasing in 2026. Very bad news for Nvidia and AMD. Image | NVIDIA More information | Tom’s Hardware In Xataka | The US remains committed to stopping China. Now it has targeted the second largest Chinese chip manufacturer

If the question is how to stop the bleeding of emptied Spain, in Cantabria they are clear: subsidizing festivals with bulls

If you have learned anything ‘Spain emptied’ At this point there are no magic recipes against depopulation. In recent years, the administrations of that rural Spain that is gradually emptying have tried everything, often without success: from offering free employment and housing to assume the management of basic services, such as gas stations and stores. Now in Cantabria they have decided to add a new strategy against rural exodus to that list: subsidize bullfighting celebrations. At the moment the measure does not seem to have served to attract new neighbors. What it is generating is controversy. A cape for bullfighting. To understand the controversy we must go back to April 28, when the Official Gazette of Cantabria (BOC) published a call of subsidies from the Ministry of the Presidency. It basically announces a sum of 41,000 euros to “promote bullfighting in rural areas.” For this purpose, the Government offers to cover up to 90% of the expenses of the festivals that revolve around the bull, with amounts that range between 2,000 and 14,500 euros, depending on whether they are bullfights, bullfights, bullfights or other “popular celebrations.” It matters what… and it matters where. So far nothing exceptional. Spain has been immersed for years in a debate (sometimes bronco) on bullfighting and whether or not it should be supported with public funds, but the Cantabrian initiative does not stand out precisely for its budget. In 2025, without going any further, the Community of Madrid approved a game of 1.7 million of euros to support the Bull Festival. What is striking about the Cantabrian case is that its objective is not only to support the ‘national holiday’. In fact, that is not even the main argument made in the call of the BOC. Its purpose is another: to fight against depopulation. The subsidies are specifically directed at the 41 municipalities of the community at “risk of depopulation” and their objective appears clearly described in the official bulletin: “Encourage the aforementioned local entities to have resources that energize their social and economic life, such as bullfighting shows.” In short, use the bullfights, bullfights, bullfights, bullfights and other shows with bulls to revitalize the economy and establish population. “Put them on the map”. In case there were any doubts, the counselor of the Presidency, Isabel Urrutia, recalled a few days ago that last year the Cantabrian Government financed bullfighting celebrations in four small municipalities of Cantabria, which in his opinion allowed “to put them in the focus of the bullfighting world.” “We help with small aid to fight against depopulation and put these municipalities on the map, many of them with a great tradition of bullfighting. The aid is fulfilling its objective,” argues the counselor after remembering the case of Pesaguero: the town has 400 inhabitants, but in 2025 1,800 fans attended its bullfighting show. What exactly do they subsidize? Low the argument that bullfighting can become a “stimulator of social and economic life”, the Cantabrian Government offers to assume up to 90% of the expenses of organizing the festivities, as long as they do not exceed certain limits: 14,500 euros in the case of bullfights or bullfighting, 10,000 if we are talking about bullfights with picadors or bullfighting of bulls, 6,000 for bullfights without picadors, calves or festivals and 2,000 for similar shows. “To award aid, the Government will take into account the classification of the municipality as being at serious risk of depopulation or special and differentiating treatment for this reason, and also the type of show or celebration,” duck the regional executive. Although it recognizes that there are 41 municipalities that meet the depopulation requirements to qualify for aid, in 2025 only bullfighting shows were subsidized in four town halls of the region: Pesaguero, Tudanca, Rasines and Bárcena de Pie de Concha. In 2024 there was one more, Molledo. This would be the third consecutive year in which subsidies have been announced that, they insist From the regional government, they are fulfilling the objective with which they were set. Opinion division. Not everyone thinks the same. The Franz Weber Foundation has questioned that the initiative really serves to strengthen the economy of those localities or combat rural exodus, and provides data as proof: the number of residents who have won the subsidized town councils can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Literally. “Four inhabitants in three years”, resume the organization, which estimates the funds mobilized between all the calls at 132,000 euros. The tables from the INE confirm that Bárcena de Pie de Concha only gained one neighbor between 2023 and 2025 and Rasines another five. Pesaguero and Tudanca lost population. “They neither fix population nor suppose a real dynamic activity,” ditch the foundation. “The autonomous Executive has dedicated around 132,000 euros since 2024 under this excuse, but the population reality in the municipalities awarded in different calls shows an evident inability to have a positive impact.” In your opinionthe real purpose of the Cantabrian Government is another: “Support bullfighting using subterfuges such as depopulation.” Images | Alex-David Baldi (Flickr) and Arild Andersen (Flickr) In Xataka | The great debate about the future of bullfighting is not in Spain, but in an unexpected country: South Korea

In the year of the World Cup, the brand is betting everything on RGB MiniLED

Hisense reaches 2026 playing a good part of its range on a single card: the RGB MiniLED. The Chinese brand has renewed everything your television catalog and has presented it to society exactly where it should be done in 2026: at the FIFA headquarters in Zurich, the same year in which the entire world will be glued to a screen watching the World Cup. This movement is not coincidental. According to Omdia data provided by Hisensethe manufacturer ranks second in the world in total television sales and first in the 100-inch or larger segment between 2023 and 2025. From that position, the brand has designed a catalog that ranges from a 116-inch giant to the most affordable models with MiniLED, through two high-end series that are going to be a lot to talk about in 2026. 116 UX RGB MiniLED Evo UR9 UR8 panel RGB MiniLED Evo (4th subpixel cyan), VA, 4K UHD, 8-bit + FRC RGB MiniLED VA 4K UHD, 8 bits + FRC, 180 Hz and 16:9 RGB MiniLED VA 4K UHD, 8 bits + FRC, 180 Hz and 16:9 resolution 3,840 x 2,160 points 3,840 x 2,160 points 3,840 x 2,160 points size 116 inches 65″,75″,85″ 55″, 65″, 75″, backlight RGB MiniLED Evo, FALD up to 8,000 nits, 3,584 dimming zones RGB MiniLED FALD, up to 4,000 nits RGB MiniLED FALD, up to 3,000 nits hdr Dolby Vision 2, Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR10, HLG Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR and HLG Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR and HLG processor Hi-View AI Engine RGB Hi-View AI Engine RGB Hi-View AI Engine RGB operating system VIDAA U9 VIDAA U9 VIDAA U9 sound 2 x 15 watts + 2 x 10 watts + 2 x 5 watts + 2 x 15 watts + 2x 10 watts Dolby Atmos, DTS 2 x 15 watts + 2 x 10 watts + 20 watts + 2 x 15 watts + 2x 10 watts Dolby Atmos, DTS 2 x 10 watts + 2 x 5 watts + 20 watts Dolby Atmos, DTS connectivity 3 x HDMI 2.1 3 x HDMI 2.1 4xHDMI 2.1 wireless connectivity Wi-Fi 6 Bluetooth 5.0 Wi-Fi 6 Bluetooth 5.0 Wi-Fi 6 Bluetooth 5.0 price Not available Not available Not available FIFA, the World Cup and TCL in the background Hisense has renewed for the third time consecutively its official sponsorship with FIFA after the 2018 and 2022 editions, and in 2026 it goes further: it will be the official and exclusive supplier of RGB MiniLED TVs for VAR Video Operations Rooms throughout the tournament. Romy Gai, FIFA’s chief business officer, said the organization “partners with Hisense to welcome the best display technology to deliver an unprecedented World Cup experience for billions of fans around the world.” Hisense is not the only one bet on the king of sport as a sales driver by 2026, its competitor TCL has been official sponsor of the Spanish Soccer Team from 2023 and expanded that agreement in October 2025 to include new products and a renewed contract. The television market anticipates one of its best years in volume precisely due to the World Cup effect, and the big Chinese brands They are well positioned to take advantage of that momentum. The pie that manufacturers share in the Soccer World Cup is not small. It is estimated that the match played between France and Argentina in the 2022 World Cup in Qatar had a hearing of 1,420 million viewers and the tournament registered a average of 2.9 billion viewers from the different television signals. All glued to a television. That’s a lot of televisions. The 116UX and the fourth color that changes the image The most advanced model in the 2026 catalog is the 116UX, a 116-inch television that incorporates the RGB MiniLED Evo panel that Hisense already advanced at CES in Las Vegas. Its particularity compared to the conventional RGB MiniLED is the incorporation of a fourth cyan subpixel, an intermediate color between the blue and green that the three traditional colors cannot reproduce accurately enough on their own. Thanks to this fourth subpixel, the 116UX manages to expand the coverage of the BT.2020 color space, the standard used in professional film production. The change applied by Hisense has certain parallels with what LG has been doing for years in its WRGB OLED panelswhere a white subpixel is added to improve brightness. The difference is that in the case of the RGB MiniLED Evo the objective is not brightness (something that is necessary in OLED) but rather to expand the volume of color available, covering complex tones that were previously only approximated by combining the three RGB subpixels. The result is an image with greater fidelity in skies, vegetation and skin, exactly the elements that make a sports broadcast look more natural. With this new panel, the 116UX is positioned as the brand’s flagship for the domestic field of large-inch models with 116″ and 100″ diagonals. UR9 and UR8: the flagships in one size below 85 inchesHisense proposes two models within its high range: the UR9 and UR8. Both models are a technological showcase of what Hisense is capable of offering in its 2026 catalog, lowering RGB MiniLED technology to more accessible price ranges for users. Both mount RGB MiniLED panels (without the last name Evo and the fourth pixel, which is reserved for the UX), the Hi-View AI Engine RGB processor, and sizes of 65, 75 and 85 inches in the case of the UR9, and from 55 inches for the UR8. One of the arguments of the panels Hisense RGB MiniLED is the improvement in color representation and increased brightness. However, here is the main difference between the UR9 and UR8, depending on the brand, the UR9 can reach peaks that exceed 4,000 nits with 1,056 local dimming zones, while the UR8 would have its ceiling at 3,000 nits. Beyond that difference, both the UR9 and the UR8 share some elements that place them in a different category from the … Read more

Meta and Google talk about nuclear fusion for the future; The short-term reality is that they are pulling natural gas

Silicon Valley has an undeniable gift for selling the future. If one listens to the great technological leaders, Artificial Intelligence will soon be powered by energy sources worthy of a science fiction novel. Goal just signed an agreement to obtain solar energy directly from satellites in space, while figures such as Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, They assure that nuclear fusion It is the great “silver bullet” that will save the sector. However, it is enough to look down from the stars to the earth to find a much smokier reality. To feed the insatiable “energy monster” that AI has unleashed, big technology companies are turning to the technology of the past. As explained from Axiosthe race to dominate artificial intelligence is accelerating at such a dizzying pace that the industry’s ambitious climate goals are taking a discreet backseat. Today, the world’s most sophisticated cloud is being built on a foundation of fossil fuels. The numbers speak for themselves. Far from nuclear fusion laboratories, the actual infrastructure being built in the United States tells a story based on natural gas. Meta’s case is perhaps the most graphic, as detailed in Bloomberg, US utility Entergy Corp. has had to increase its capital spending plan by almost a third, reaching $57 billion, to build 10 new natural gas plants dedicated exclusively to powering the new data campus Hyperion of Meta in Louisiana. This gigantic complex will require more than 7 gigawatts of power, the equivalent of the output of seven large nuclear reactors. Google, the historic champion of clean energy, is not far behind either. An investigation by the market intelligence firm Cleanview has brought to light Google’s partnership with the company Crusoe Energy to develop a huge data center in Texas named “good night“. The project includes a 933-megawatt gas plant built outside the traditional electrical grid. The end of the green utopia? The environmental impact of this installation is not minor, how to explain Guardianthe plant will emit up to 4.5 million tons of carbon dioxide per year. To put it in perspective, this exceeds the annual emissions of the entire city of San Francisco or is equivalent to putting 970,000 additional gasoline cars on the roads. Given this, Google’s official position is cautious. Chrissy Moy, company spokesperson, does not deny the project before the mediaalthough it clarifies that, although they are linked to the campus, they still “do not have a contract in force” to acquire energy from said gas plant. How have they developed in oil pricethe origin of this sudden gas rush is that data centers are putting local power grids under unprecedented pressure, causing consumers to bear the cost of this increased energy competition. To overcome the slow expansions of the public network and the endless waiting lists for permits, Wired points out that data center developers They are choosing to generate their own energy “behind the meter” (off-grid). And in that fast and private strategy, gas is king. Their green mask falls off. This is a serious blow to Silicon Valley’s green image. As you remember GuardianGoogle was once a pioneer in promising net zero emissions by 2030. However, the company itself has had to admit that its carbon emissions have increased by 48% in the last five years due to data centers. Now, those environmental objectives have been internally downgraded to the category of climate moonshots (speculative projects very difficult to achieve). The underlying problem is purely physical. As he reflects Impakterenergy—not chip shortages—is emerging as the real bottleneck for AI. Traditional renewable sources are intermittent, and large language models require devouring electricity 24 hours a day. A systemic problem that is already raising blisters in Washington. The return to natural gas is not an isolated anecdote of a couple of companies. There are currently about 100 gigawatts of gas-fired power in development in the United States destined for data centers alone. Microsoft just signed a deal with oil giant Chevron in Texas, and permits for OpenAI’s Project Jupiter in New Mexico suggest it could emit up to 14 million tons of greenhouse gases annually (triple that of Google’s project). Faced with this fossil avalanche, Democratic senators such as Whitehouse, Van Hollen and Heinrich have sent letters demanding formal explanations from leaders of Meta and OpenAI for putting the country’s climate commitments at risk. The industry defends itself by arguing that it is a necessary evil. Cully Cavness, president of Crusoe, explained that natural gas it is a critical “bridge” and the only power source available today capable of scaling at the pace AI demands. Next-generation clean alternatives will take decades. Meta’s promising agreement to receive solar energy from space will not have a pilot satellite until 2028and its commercial viability is not expected, at best, until the 2030s or 2040s. The same happens with commercial fusion reactors: they will not dump a single watt into the grid well into the next decade. The great paradox of AI. Business magazines celebrate the financial success of this revolution. In their profiles of the most influential companies, TIME relates how Google, under Sundar Pichai, has reached a $4 trillion market value driven by its advances in AI, while Mark Zuckerberg celebrates record ad revenue on Meta by promising systems that will soon “understand the unique personal goals” of each user. Silicon Valley promises that this same Artificial Intelligence will one day help us solve humanity’s great challenges, including climate change itself. But the current paradox is inescapable: in the real world of 2026, to train the most brilliant and avant-garde artificial mind ever created, human beings still inevitably need to set natural gas on fire. Image | Photo by Tasos Mansour on Unsplash Xataka | Solving the mystery of the red balls on high-voltage cables: a simple way to save lives

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.