We already know how many euros a triple folding costs. Huawei Mate XT Ultimate has opened the ban

The folding phonesS They have been with us for a few years. Enough to begin to understand that, far from being a product with aspirations to approach the most mainstream consumer, they are increasingly a piece of niche collector. The folding “fold” type continue to touch the 2,000 euros and the new trend is not to reduce: it is to take them one step further. Huawei has been the first, and he has done it with his Huawei Mate XT Ultimate. The terminal was launched in China for about 2,500 euros to change. We already know the global price. It is far from that figure. An increasingly niche product The fold folding was not enough, the new trend is to add a new fold for the phone to incorporate an even larger panel. This is the case of Mate XT Ultimate, with a Total 10.2 -inch panel, 7.9 inches in double fold and 6.4 inches completely folded. A phone, three sizes. Buying a device with this peculiarity will be priced at 3,499 euros, thus becoming the most expensive folding phone of the moment. They are 1,500 euros more compared to Huawei Mate X6the last folding of Huawei. The company has not detailed what markets will arrive, but confirms that the global version will be 16 GB of RAM and 1 TB of storage. A niche price for a niche product and, although it may seem like a crazy idea, Huawei knows very well what he does. Huawei is an absolute leader in folding sales Not only in China, but worldwide. He has managed to dethrone Samsung, not to grow, and the launch of a triple folding seems to meet the needs of those consumers who seek to go one step further. Image | Huawei In Xataka | The long goodbye of Huawei in Spain: of strategic partner to Technology Non Grata

38% of its experts have formed in China

The Government led by Donald Trump is determined to make the decisions that are necessary to sustain US leadership in the scope of the artificial intelligence (AI). This technology has a critical value for the great powers. In fact, The dispute over world supremacy that China currently maintains and the US turns largely around it. And he does it because his applications are presumably unlimited. The AI ​​is already being used for medical diagnosis through image analysis, to design new drugs or to produce new materials, Among many other possibilities. But it can also be used to develop very sophisticated weapons. Last week James David Vance, the US vice president, He spoke a speech During the last day of the summit dedicated to AI in Paris in which he expressed very clearly what is the position of his country in this area: “The most powerful artificial intelligence systems are built in the US with chips designed and manufactured in America (…) USA is the leader in AI, and our administration plans to keep it like this. We have all the components throughout the entire chain of Value, including the advanced semiconductor design, avant -garde algorithms, and, of course, transformative applications. ” This is a declaration of intentions, although the US does not have everything in its favor. More than a third of the US experts come from China A good part of the companies that have developed advanced AI models are American. Openai, Google, Microsoft, Anthropic, Meta, IBM, Chere or Xai, among others, are from the US. However, the knowledge that sustains innovation in the country currently led by Donald Trump is not exclusively in the hands of US researchers; Chinese scientists are making decisive contributions to the US ecosystem. In the US there are more Chinese experts in AI than professionals with a strictly American origin According to a group of researchers from the Paulgo Institute in Chicago (USA), 38% of AI experts who develop their professional career in the US have trained in Chinese universities. In fact, this American institution has concluded that In the US there are more Chinese experts in AI than professionals with a strictly American origin. This, According to Nikkei Asiasome experts in the industry concern due to the possibility that China decides to repatriate their students and researchers from the US to reinforce their AI industry. Some of the best centers dedicated to the science and technology on the planet are in China. The Tsinghua University of Beijing, the Jiao Tong University of Shanghai, the Zhejiang University of Hangzhou, the University of Science and Technology of Hefei or the University of Technology of South China, in Canton, are just a few. All of them have something important in common: they are world reference centers in technology, innovation and applied science. And many of his students are working in the US. At the current situation It is understandable that some American experts are concerned about the possibility of losing these qualified personnel. Image | Xataka with Midjourney More information | Nikkei Asia In Xataka | We already know the secret of the extreme efficiency of Deepseek: it has dodged the Cuda de Nvidia standard

Deepseek is expanding silently through the Chinese bureaucracy. And he is giving us a lesson about the future of AI

China is rapid Deepseekits open source AI model, in public administrations and strategic companies. At least Eight cities have already integrated this system into their government networksin addition to Chinese giants like byd – and not Chinese as Nissan– They are incorporating it into their electric cars. Why is it important. The speed with which Depseek is being adopted shows the two sides of the same currency: On the one hand, the ease with which an open source model can expand. On the other, the ability of the Chinese system to implement technological changes without the usual bureaucratic obstacles in Western democracies. Obviously, the second is subject to the unique party system. The facts. Guangzhou has been a pioneer by integrating Depseek into its government network: It has managed to reduce the waiting time in citizens by 43%. Has reached 97% precision in its consultation management. The system has made citizens more quickly access public policies information in addition to expediting official documents processing. For its part, Hohhot, capital of Interior Mongolia, has already completed the deployment of the model Deepseek R1 in its government extranet. Your management office Big Data Plan to expand the use of the system, from call attention to multimodal data analysis, including texts, images and videos to improve the shared use of public data. Six other Chinese municipal governments have already announced their integration with Deepseek. Zhengzhou has started training sessions about AI for its officials. In Dalian, more than 1,300 officials and representatives of 500 companies have received training on the system. The background. The rapid adoption of Deepseek by the Chinese administration contrasts with western caution and slowness before AI in the public sector. Europe is more focused on Set regulatory frameworks While China takes advantage of its centralized system to accelerate the transformation of its bureaucracy towards a more efficient format. The success – or not – of this implementation can demonstrate that the adoption rate can be so important or more than the innovation itself. China is able to convert a disadvantage (its unique party system) into a competitive advantage for AI. In Xataka | Deepseek exposed: how money earns and what role does the Chinese government have in this AI Outstanding image | Xataka with Mockuuuups Studio

Investing in carbon capture instead of renewable energy is to throw money

The fight against climate change is fundamentally based on reducing the amount of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. One of the most direct solutions is carbon capture: extract the co₂ from industrial fireplaces or ambient air. So why don’t you finish taking off in front of renewables? Short. Carbon capture technologies are equipment that is placed in industries or outdoors to eliminate pollution without modifying the source. Although it sounds promising, A recent Stanford study It shows that carbon capture is in the long run much more expensive and less effective than direct transition to renewable energy. In addition to improving air quality and stopping climate change, for most countries of the world, electrifying the industry and obtain Energy, compared to a total bet for carbon capture that maintained the consumption of fossil fuels. The study. The researchers compared two extreme scenarios: a world that bets 100% for renewable energies and electrification; and a world that continues to burn fossil fuels, but tries to reduce its impact with carbon capture and improvements in energy efficiency. In contrast to intuition, the most profitable option is by far completely replacing fossil fuels by sources such as wind, sun, geothermia and hydroelectric energy. Because They directly eliminate the use of fuelswhich is the main source of pollutants in the air, and because they reduce energy demand instead of continuing to increase it. More profitable. Clean sources and electrification would not only directly reduce carbon dioxide, avoiding five million deaths a year caused by pollution. Since carbon capture consumes energy, the first scenario would also involve economic savings compared to the other scenario, reducing energy consumption by 54% and energy costs by 60%. The key is the opportunity cost. Using renewable energy to feed carbon capture systems prevents those same energies from being used to replace polluting sources. “If you spend a dollar in carbon capture instead of renewables, you are increasing carbon dioxide, air pollution, energy requirements, energy costs, pipelines and total social costs,” Explains the main author of the studyMark Jacobson. Conclusion. What the study points out is that, although carbon capture may seem an attractive technical solution, in practice it maintains the inefficient and polluting infrastructure of combustion. How to try to empty a bathtub without closing the tap. The substantive problem is not solved: the use of fossil fuels. The researchers conclude that, to face the climatic crisis effectively, it is much more beneficial to abandon the idea of ​​cleaning the air after polluting and betting on a total transformation towards renewable energies. The evidence says that investing in clean energy is not only cheaper, but also the safest option for the environment and global health. Image | Pixabay In Xataka | The big business in which CO2 is becoming captured and burying it underground

What is and main novelties of the new artificial intelligence model of Xai

Let’s tell you The novelties of Grok 3the new artificial intelligence model launched by XAI. This is the passage of Elon Musk’s company in the war to get the best chatbot of AI, and with which he adds to Grok reasoning capabilities. We are going to start explaining what exactly Grok 3 is, so that if you had never heard of it you can understand it. Then, we will explain the main differences of this model and why it is important. What is Grok 3 Grok is the name of the XAI artificial intelligence model, Elon Musk’s company. It is a model of AI like Gemini of Google or GPT of OpenAi. In the case of Grok, it is the model that uses the Chatbot Grok (yes, they have the same name) linked to the social network X, so much so that to be able to use it you need to have an account in this social network. As each artificial intelligence model, Grok 3 is the version released in February 2025, and that at the time of writing this article is the most modern version. So, It is a version that improves the characteristics of Grok 2and that offers more advantages. Just as other AI models are also evolving and improving, Grok does the same, trying not to be left behind in the frantic career of this technology. Elon Musk had promised a true revolution with this new version, although finally it is simply at the height of the competition. Another thing you should know is that Grok 3 is a family of models, with Grok-3 and Grok-3 Mini. The first is the complete model with all functions, and the second is a smaller one that offers balance between speed and quality of responses. What news brings Grok 3 The first difference is that while Grok 2 became free for all users, Grok 3 is going to be a payment modeland you will need to pay a subscription to use it. It will be available in the premium+ subscription of X, which costs 22.08 euros per month, or on an official new website that is not yet available in Europe. As for the model itself, the main novelty is that This model is able to reasonsomething we have already seen in the rest of the AI ​​models. With this, the AI ​​can generate more precise answers by analyzing the different response options before offering the final result. This reasoning capacity, as in other models, is optional. But if you choose it, another difference is that Grok 3 will hide the reasoning processesbeing less transparent than competition. Even so, it offers the possibility of generating multiple candidate responses. The other great incentive of this AI is that it allows Offer answers without filtersso some can be politically incorrect. This means that there will be very little self -censorship, and that you can ask almost anything. According to the companyGrok 3 has surpassed several competition models in benchmarks or test banks used to measure the AI ​​capacities. It has been above models such as GPT-4O, Deepseek V4 and Gemini 2 Pro in non-reasoning tasks Grok also improves in computational capacity, training with 10 times more computing capacity than Grok 2, and has been trained with a powerful 100,000 GPUS NVIDIA H100 cluster. In parallel to Grok 3 we have Deepsearch, which becomes the artificial intelligence -based search engine, and that Grok 3 will use. It is a tool that functions as a chatbot capable of reasoning, and that can navigate online and create Detailed reports to offer in -depth information on topics you ask. In Xataka Basics | Grok guide: 32 functions and things you can do for free with X artificial intelligence

Elon Musk cult

Elon Musk’s startup, XAI, yesterday presented its new family of artificial intelligence models, called Grok 3. He presumed that these models surpassed their competitors, but it does not seem that we have a specially striking qualitative leap here. And that is a problem, because Musk wants us to pay for using Grok 3. To start, Grok 3. In that family the first prominent are Grok 3 Beta and Grok 3 Mini, the two initial versions that directly compete with generative AI models such as GPT-4O, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Deepseek V3 or Gemini 2.0 Pro. According to the benchmarks used in XAI, Grok 3 surpasses them all, and that good performance seems to be endorsed by independent entities as LMarena. There is “reasoning” mode. Curiously, Grok 3 does not have a separate version to “reason”, but the model itself is able to activate that mode of reasoning to compete with Deepseek R1 or with O1. Once again XAI reveals that benchmarks in this area seem to place Grok 3 as the one that best behaves. But reason in silence. Grok 3’s reasoning mode, yes, does not show what you are thinking, something that other reasoning models do. According to XAI, that design decision allows you to prevent competence models from using these data to distill and reuse them in their own developments. It is a zancadilla to the competition, without more. Deepsearch, the other great protagonist. One of the most striking functions of Grok 3 is Deepsearch, which is nothing more than the response to research tools such as Deep Research, from Openai. Experts like Andrej Karpathy They have tried it And it seems to behave well, but it is actually on horseback among the models of reasoning and de -presence, which is more advanced. Xai is updated, and that has merit. If a few weeks ago we warned that Grok 3 did not arrive and Xai was staying behindthings have just changed. If we listen to those first demos and internal tests, Grok 3 is a model of the good or better than its current competitors. That is an achievement for Xai, which It was created In April 2023 and has managed to recover all the land that its competitors had already traveled. It will have a voice. At the moment Grok 3 does not offer the ability to talk through the voice as they do competitors such as Openai or Google models, but Musk indicated that they are working on it. “The voice mode is still a bit irregular,” commented in x“so it probably launches within a week, but it is impressive.” Grok 3 is not free. Another surprise. After the arrival of Deepseekcompetition does not stop offering advanced options and even reasoning models free of charge. To use Grok 3 of the former you will have to pay the premium+subscription, which costs $ 50 per month. In XAI they have created a new plan called Supergrok that according to rumors will cost $ 30 per month and will also use this model later. Grok 3 will not be initially available in Europe. And neither do they open source. Although Musk already published the initial version of Grok as Open Sourcehe does not seem willing to do the same immediately with Grok 3. Nor did he do it with Grok 2, although just during the launch of Grok 3 announced that he would soon license that second version as Open Source. As with the decision to hide “how” Grok 3 thinks in its mode of reasoning, Musk seems clear that he prefers not to share too much about his AI models to prevent competition from taking advantage of his progress. A complicated business model. Precisely the fact of offering it only as part of a payment subscription complicates things to make Grok 3 popularize. A priori it does not seem to be a model of AI that represents a qualitative leap important enough to justify that someone pays for him when there are free alternatives, so, why should we do it? Musk cult. XAI’s strategy and Elon Musk attracts attention because he seems to force us to choose Grok 3 more for our ideology – Musk’s fans or not – than for a practical and rational issue – which his model is really better and more useful. Benchmarks seem to point to this model behaving something better than competition, but the jump, we repeat, does not seem notable and some independent tests show that Grok 3 is far from perfect, for example When programming. It already happens with Tesla. It is something similar to what is happening with Tesla and its actions: in recent years the value of the company has shot in the stock market. Its market assessment (1.14 billion dollars) is exceptionally high. As much as to be equivalent to that of the following 16 companies that manufacture cars. Among them are Toyota, Byd, Ferrari, GM, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Ford, BMW, Honda, Hyundai or Stellantis. There is no rational or logical economic reason here: only the popular belief that Tesla “has to be worth more.” It is the cult of Musk made investment (or bet). Grok 3 will have much to demonstrate. Grok 3 may end up being available for the standard accounts of X. It is what ended up occurring with Grok 2, a model that demonstrated, for example, being especially striking by Not having censorship. However, with Grok 3, the arguments to pay do not seem to be clear, and the demos that were shown in the presentation were basically “one of the same.” And with that it will be difficult for Xai and Musk to convince us that using their AI is the best option. Image | DVIDS | XAI In Xataka | Elon Musk lights the “most powerful the world’s cluster.” One with 100,000 gpus nvidia h100

You can buy the PS5 Pro with the record reader. In pack, without speculation and with a price reduction

For many months we have seen how the record reader for PlayStation 5 was practically impossible to buy it without having to resort to speculation. Now, it seems that everything has changed: stores have already begun to add reader stock, and without getting out of its official price. But we have also been able to find the PlayStation 5 Pro with record reader and … a good discount. If you have waited all this time to buy the console with the accessory – and you did not take advantage of Game offers – now you are in FNAC for 799 euros. To understand the context, the PS5 pro without reader costs 799 euros, so the reader, in this case, would come for free. PS5 Pro + Disc reader * Some price may have changed from the last review FNAC adds to the stores that already have stock reader stock The PlayStation 5 Pro Base is a completely digital console. Does not allow to reproduce video games in physical format, although it is Compatible with the record reader that was launched for the PlayStation 5 Slim. In this way, only with this reader, both digital and physical video games can be reproduced. Since before its launch, it has been almost impossible to buy the record reader without resorting to speculation. This problem came with the announcement of the PlayStation 5 Probut it seems that now – we crossed the fingers – It seems that everything is returning to normal. More and more stores have added stock of the record reader. The record reader arrives at a good time when a little time has passed since the launch of the PS5 Pro. The stores have begun to lower the price of the console; Above all, we have seen it in Mediamarkt with the occasional campaign, but now we have also seen it with the current Fnac offer. An offer, yes, oriented to those who seek maximum performance and the greatest power in a console of the current generation. You may also be interested in these accessories for PS5 Universal Razer Quick Charging Stand – For Dualsense PlayStation 5 (fast charging, curved support design, USB feeding, single hand navigation) black midnight * Some price may have changed from the last review Remote Battery – USB charger for wireless PS5 – portable battery for dualsense plays while load – long duration +12 hours of autonomy – PS5 accessories * Some price may have changed from the last review Some of the links of this article are affiliated and can report a benefit to Xataka. In case of non -availability, offers may vary. Images | Jose GarcíaPlayStation In Xataka | PlayStation 5 Pro vs PlayStation 5: These are all the differences between the two Sony consoles In Xataka | Two years ago I bought a PS5. I wish someone would have told me that I also needed these accessories

The extreme cold has not touched Spain for two years and experts fear that we are about to see a third. With all that implies

Spring is just around the corner and, we like it or not, this means that we can start drawing conclusions. The first is that every minute that passes is more likely to finish winter without seeing any “cold wave.” And that is not even what most worries meteorologists. Because the real problem is that it would be the second consecutive winter without cold waves and a third would be at hand. With all that this entails. Isn’t it a bit precipitated to give the winter for dead? The truth is not. Although this week an extremely cold mass of air will cover a good part of Europe, Spain will escape from it. And on March 1 (which is when climate spring begins) is very close to be able to house realistic hopes about an extreme cold episode. And, in the background, what we are going to see this week summarizes very well what has been going on two winters: we have not suffered powerful cold irruptions. They have all stayed north. It is a story that is repeated again and again. But it’s not so weird either, right? That is true. The cold episodes become more and more rare in Spain. In fact, this January can only be described as very warm (Although we have suffered a handful of cold nights). A example that Roberto Granda puts It is that of Molina de Aragón. The average minimum between 1991 and 2020 is -3.3º, but this year it has been at -0.3. The data speak for themselves. In the end, As I pointed out A few years ago our partner Javier Pastor, “is not that it is very cold now, it is that we do not do it because it is no longer so common.” With this in mind, the question begins to be … how long can this last? “Unusual and worrying.” That is, what would happen if the winter of 2026 is still on the same line? The answer, According to Samuel Biener de Meteoredit is summarized in those two words: “Unusual and worrying.” Because we have documented other consecutive warm winters (those of 97 and 98, those of 2000 and 2001 or those of 2023 and 14); But we have not seen three consecutive yet. And we know it will arrive. Because, As Biener points outwarm winters are being increasingly frequent. It is a matter of time that we fit three. And what is the problem? More than a problem (that too), we talk about a fear: that warm winters stop being an anomaly and become the norm. That change is a large-scale disruption of the country’s socio-ecological system. It is no accident that, a few months after the drought, The data begin to be so bad. Again. Not only climatic pressures They hit us stronger than everthe thing is They don’t let us replenish. And that will lead us to the edge of the precipice again and again. Yes it’s true. The current climate is full of paradoxes: Historical ice minimums live with snow maximumstudies on The weakening of the Gulf current They coexist with others that point to nothing has changed in substantial terms and thus a long etcetera. However, there is something that Yes we know is that we are vulnerable And if we don’t prepare ourselves, Let’s be much more. Image | ECMWF In Xataka | Spain faces the driest climate in its last 1,200 years. The fault is the Azores Islands

This is how Ech works, the Technological Shield of Cloudflare that has put the operators between the sword and the wall

The LaLiga fight against illegal soccer broadcasts It has encountered an unexpected obstacle: Ech (Encrypted Client Hello), an encryption protocol that stars in the great conflict and the collateral damage of this battle, which splashes thousands of companies. Turning point. It all started when Cloudflare implemented in October 2023 (Encrypted Client Hello), an extension of TLS that prevents operators from identifying which specific domain is requesting the user. This protocol makes it technically impossible for operators to see which specific domain requests a user. The contrast. ECH works as an additional encryption layer that completely hides the final destination of a connection: When a user tries to access a website, his browser initiates an encrypted “negotiation” (Handshake TLS) With the server. Before ECH, although this connection was encrypted, the name of the domain was traveling “in clear” so that the intermediate servers could enrut the traffic. With ECH, the name of the domain is also encrypted, making it impossible for the operators to know which concrete website the user is accessing. The system is even more complicated because Cloudflare uses shared IPS: The same IP address can house hundreds or thousands of different websites. Without ECH, the operators could see what domain each user requested and block selectively. With ATU activated, they only see an encrypted IP that could be serving both legal and illegal content. This leaves two options to the operators: block all the IP (affecting hundreds or thousands of sites) or not blocking anything. When they choose the first thing the Blocked legitimate websites. To avoid blockages, which also translate into a reputational crisis, some operators are resorting to alternative techniques such as: Traffic patterns analysis. Deep inspection of packages (DPI). BLOCK BY SNI (Indication of the server name) when ECH is not active. But these solutions are complex, expensive and not always effective. The conflict has climbed, Movistar has softened his blockages, Digi has hardened them and Vodafone says to have a more precise solution although it has not revealed details yet (since Xataka We have asked them for this without having received an answer at the time of publishing this article). They possibly use one of the last points. The next. Ech has supposed a huge change in Internet architecture. The precedent of Austria, where IPS blockades were prohibited To protect the neutrality of the network, it suggests that the current regulation model needs to adapt to this new reality. Meanwhile, the pulse between LaLiga and Cloudflare persists, and thousands of Spanish companies also remain trapped in the midst of the conflict. Outstanding image | Cloudflare In Xataka | What is cloudflare, how it works and why a fall or block makes half the Internet fail

Renfe and Ouigo prepare their artillery against the Railway Liberalization of Cercanías

The first battle has already occurred but there is a lot (a lot) for the war to end. Because after the liberalization of the high Spanish speed, the opening of the market arrives in vicinity and medium distance. A space that is still Monopoly of Renfe but which should be able to arrive new actors in the coming years. Among those actors is, of course, ouigo. Liberalization. In 2021, the Spanish roads lived a historical moment: Ouigo began to operate in our country. For the first time, Renfe had competition and came from the hand of a French origin company. Later it would arrive Iro From Italy. They are currently the three companies that offer high -speed services in the Spanish roads. Liberalization was forced with the guidelines of the Fourth Rail Package of the European Union with the idea that competition will help offer more efficient and cheap services for the user. High speed liberalized, Spain has to take the next step: near and medium distance. A delicate theme. High speed liberalization has already meant a clash between the government, Renfe and Ouigo. But opening the doors to near and medium distance is an even more thorny issue because we talk about rail services that have public service obligations. They explain in Five days that in 2023 these services transferred 492 million passengers and that most of them have revenues below the average. Entering this market is a real risk for companies since they must deal with accessible prices and, at the same time, costs that allow them to earn money. A first advance. Following the railway services provided with public service obligations, government and ouigo have already collided for this reason. From the Executive They lamented in April 2024 that the new operators had the advantage of deciding where they wanted to be, while Renfe did look at the obligation to reach many more cities. According to Óscar Puente, Minister of Transportation, this prevents Renfe from competing in the same conditions as its rivals that can afford some flexibility when playing with prices. A flexibility that from the government consider excessive in the case of Ouigo to those who have directly accused throw prices below cost sustained by the French state. Yes, but. What we expect with the liberalization of near and medium distance is a new battle between Renfe and operators that are about to be revealed. We already know that one of them is an ouigo but the rest (at least three) remains in anonymity. They explain in 20 minutes that now the battle to define what aspects are key to getting the future tender has begun. In Ouigo they already press to make it clear that they will only be presented to the contest if they can have access to the rolling material and the staff, which would be subrogated. In this way, the risk to run would be much less. From Renfe they have another proposal: commission the work to the operator “that is in a better disposition to provide the service”, in words collected by the Digital newspaper. The company fears that competitors choose to offer too low prices and then cannot fulfill their obligations Yes, but (part 2). In addition to the above conditions, Ouigo would have put another condition: compensation of one million euros if, finally, the tender would not be taken after being presented to the contest. They defend that the cost of preparing for this tender already involves a cost of three million euros, so they require being able to recover part of the investment if it goes wrong. In The Spanish They pick up that the company also wants the first tenders to open the door to simple and little complex services. That is, start with lots that do not present cross -border circulations, for example. When? At the moment, what we have left is to wait because the liberalization of near and medium distance can still take several years. At the moment, The Renfe contract is active until 2027 and contemplates an extension of another five years. However, the services that barely suppose 3% of the contract, can be liberalized as of January 2026. Therefore, we would be talking that the bulk of the amounts and medium distance services operated by a player other than Renfe would not reach up to 2028 or, even, 2033 if the contract that he has right now is reached. The CNMC, yes, has already opened a Public Consultation Phase so that interested operators register their claims. Photo | Renfe In Xataka | While Europe launches into the arms of the competition, the United Kingdom nationalizes its trains. The reason: they were a disaster

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.