Month: April 2026

This is the new Samsung promo

by

You want a new cell phone, an appliance or a TV, but it doesn’t do you any good to make a big expense. It is very likely that, like me, this has happened to you on more than one occasion. There are stores that offer financing and make it easier for us, but these are usually limited in time or have a high interest rate. It just comes in the new promo from the official Samsung storewhich offers Interest-free financing for up to 24 months with PayPal. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Thanks to it, we can buy the best that the Korean manufacturer has and pay for it comfortably. In addition, depending on the device or appliance, we will also be able to benefit from Additional discounts and other benefits which we will see a little further down and which will be available until next April 27. This is the new promo from the official Samsung store As we say, interest-free financing with PayPal is one of the strong points of this promo. In this way, for example, we can take the S95F (one of the best tvs of 2025) and finance it in 24 months paying just under 75 euros per month. This is just an example, since the same can be applied with phones, wearables, home appliances or laptops. Now, to this we must add some extra things. To start, both delivery and collection of the old appliance (or TV) are free. In fact, it has a tune-up service with which it will leave you everything assembled and working. In addition, the expert chat that the official store has can give us personalized advice on our purchase and, on certain devices, give us a discount code to save a little more. Along with all this, it must also be taken into account that the Samsung store allows extend the warranty on your televisions and appliances. Finally, it is important not to forget about the service Delivery and Premiere (with which we can save by handing over our old device) and Samsung Rewards, with which we will obtain rewards and points to spend on other purchases. Some interesting offers from this new promo Galaxy S26 One of the devices that we can choose in this promo is the new Galaxy S26. If you like compact phones, This Samsung device is one of the best options. It is a light mobile (it barely weighs 167 grams) that has a good 6.3-inch screen and a triple camera system that performs at a good level. In addition, it has 12 GB of RAM. The 512 GB storage version of this mobile starts at 1,199 euros, for which we would pay 47.88 euros per month if we finance for 24 months with PayPal. Now, if we choose this payment method, we will obtain a direct discount of 50 euros that we can complement with a 5% discount if we ask for a coupon in the expert chat or with a 50 euros direct discount if we use Delivery and Release. Depending on the device we deliver, we can save up to an additional 464 euros. All this together leaves its price in about 1,092 euros that we can reduce more by handing over our old device. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Galaxy S26+ We may really like the previous mobile, but we prefer something bigger. This is where the Galaxy S26+which comes with a 6.7-inch screen with a higher resolution than the previous one (QHD+). It has the same Exynos 2600 processor, the same RAM memory and the same camera system, although it increases the size of its battery to 4,900 mAh and its fast charging up to 45 W. The phone, in its version with 512 GB of storage, starts at 1,440 euros, which would be 58.29 euros per month if we finance the purchase with PayPal in 24 months. As with the previous one, we can obtain the same discounts of 5% (or 70 euros direct discount for Delivery and Release) and 50 euros for using this payment method. Everything would lower its price to 1,329 euros. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Galaxy S26 Ultra We can also take advantage of this Samsung promo to get the Galaxy S26 Ultraa phone that undoubtedly stands out for your new privacy screenbut it has many other strong points. Inside it is the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, one of the best processors on the market. In addition, it has a 5,000 mAh battery with 60 W fast charging, a top camera system and a 6.9-inch screen that is a delight for watching movies or playing games. The version with 1 TB capacity of this mobile starts at 1,949 euros, which, financed over 24 months without interest with PayPal, would be equivalent to 77.04 euros per month. Now, with PayPal we will have a direct discount of 100 euros that we can add to an additional 5% if we ask for a code in the expert chat (or 100 euros direct discount with Delivery and Release). Everything together leaves us its price in 1,757 euros. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Galaxy Book6 Pro The new samsung laptops They also fall within this promo from the official store. The Galaxy Book6 Pro model is a powerful device equipped with an Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16 GB of DDR5 RAM and a 512 GB SSD, which translates into hardware that will perform very well for years. In addition, its 16-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X screen has great anti-glare technology. All rounded off with a battery that gives up to 30 hours of autonomy. This equipment starts with a PVP of 1,999 euros, which would be equivalent to 83.29 euros per month If we choose interest-free financing in 24 months. By paying with PayPal we will obtain a direct discount of 100 euros and we … Read more

John Deere had been preventing farmers from repairing their tractors for years. Now he will have to pay them 99 million dollars

by

A modern tractor is a computer on wheels: GPS, sensors, telemetry and proprietary software. Buying it costs a lot more money than a normal car, but until now not even that made the farmer its real owner. John Deere has agreed to pay $99 million to close a class action lawsuit in the United States which accused him of monopolizing the repairs of his machinery, forcing thousands of farmers to depend on authorized workshops with inflated prices and waiting times that could ruin an entire harvest. Why is it important. This agreement is not just about tractors. It is the most visible case of a battle that affects phones, cars, appliances and consoles: that of right to repair what you have bought. If a manufacturer can software block access to the guts of a product you already own, ownership becomes a mere pantomime. What John Deere has done with its tractors, Apple has long done with its iPhones and Tesla with its cars. What has happened. The lawsuit was filed in 2022. Farmers Alleged Deere Purposely Restricted Access to Its Diagnostic Softwareforcing them to go to dealerships that charged artificially high prices. Deere has not admitted wrongdoing, but has accepted the following: Create a $99 million fund to compensate those affected who have paid reparations since 2018. Open to farmers and independent workshops the diagnostic tools that until now only their dealers had. Allow diagnostics and reprogramming in offline mode before the end of 2026. Between the lines. The figure of 99 million is not coincidental. Deere has chosen to stay a million short of nine figures, a classic psychological trick to make it sound less serious in the headlines. But the estimated real damages are much higher: the overpricing in repairs has cost farmers between 190 and 387 million, and total losses could reach 4.2 billion. The fund will be distributed among around 200,000 farmers. Each one will receive a symbolic amount. They cost less than $500 each. Yes, but. John Deere has committed to opening up its repair tools, but only for ten years. After that period, nothing prevents you from turning off the tap again. The company already promised to improve access to repairs in 2023 and, according to the plaintiffs, it failed to keep its word. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission, the US regulator, keeps another lawsuit open against Deere by the same pattern of behavior. So this soap opera will have more chapters. The big question. The case of tractors is the tip of the iceberg of something that affects us all. A modern tractor, an electric car or a smart thermostat share the same logic: the software inside can turn the owner into a user with permission from the manufacturer. What has been decided in a US court about agricultural machinery will end up defining the limits of ownership in the digital age. Also in Europe. In Xataka | Every summer fires devastate Spain. There is a common culprit that goes unnoticed: old tractors Featured image | Randy Fath

The most buoyant market right now is selling streaming and satellite images of US movements to Iran.

by

In recent years, the number of active satellites in orbit has exceeded 7,500many of them dedicated to observing the Earth with a precision that allows us to distinguish objects just a few meters away. At the same time, millions of position signals from aircraft and ships were broadcast every minute openly throughout the planet. Never before has there been so much accessible information about what is happening, in almost real time, anywhere on the planet. A new war market in real time. The war in Iran has opened a unexpected showcaseor where each military movement becomes almost immediate content, packaged and disseminated as if it were a live event by an international artist. Chinese technology companies have detected that opportunity and have begun to offer detailed analysis on US bases, deployments and operations using open data combined with artificial intelligence. What previously required state intelligence resources is now presented as an accessible, visual and viral product, capable of circulating both on social networks and specialized platforms. The result is a kind military streaming where the movements of a superpower are transformed into information merchandise. Fusion between open data and AI. I counted this week the Washington Post that the core of this phenomenon is in the combination of public sources (such as satellite images, flight trackers or maritime data) with algorithms capable of processing them on a large scale. Here are companies that we had already talked about before like MizarVisionwhich use these resources to reconstruct entire deployments, identify aircraft types or follow naval group routes in near real time. Although much of the data already existed, the difference now is in speedautomation and the ability to cross-reference information on a massive scale, turning simple scattered signals into coherent military narratives. This drastically reduces the distance between the public and the strategic. Intelligence as a commercial product. The real turn is not only in technology, but in the business model that surrounds her. These companies do not operate like traditional intelligence agencies, but rather as suppliers that sell visibility on military operations, promoting their capabilities with real examples of active conflicts. Signatures as Jing’an Technology They have even gone so far as to publish alleged records of communications or mission reconstructionsreinforcing the idea that they can “see everything.” Thus, war ceases to be just a geopolitical scenario and becomes a source of income based on the exploitation of raw information transformed into digestible intelligence. Money flows in only one direction. Behind this apparent democratization of intelligence there is a very specific economic flow that mainly benefits the Chinese technological ecosystem. They remembered in the post that many of these companies have grown under the umbrella of the integration strategy Beijing civil-militaryreceiving funding and indirect support to develop dual capabilities. Every report sold, every analysis disseminated and every platform used rstrengthens that industrial fabricfeeding a circuit where data (often generated by Western infrastructures) ends up generating value within China. In practice, monitoring the movements of the United States not only exposes its operations, but also helps finance the technological development of a strategic competitor. A diffuse but growing threat. Although US authorities doubt that these companies can penetrate truly sensitive systems, the problem lies not so much in absolute precision as in the trend that they can represent. The ability to map movements, detect patterns and anticipate deployments is already a advantage in scenarios crisis, even if the data is not perfect. Furthermore, this model offers China an additional advantage: it can benefit from the information without officially getting involvedusing private companies as intermediaries. The consequence is something of a new type of battlefield, one where open, processed and commercialized information becomes a strategic weapon in itself. Image | MizarVision In Xataka | The US is redrawing the map of its bases in Europe. And none of the countries that have said “no to war” appear In Xataka | Of all the paradoxes of the war in the Middle East, few imagined this ending: with a “half-way” deal between the US and Iran

science points to something that disappears when you roast it

by

The world of nutrition and supplements is full of dizzying promises, with products that make miraculous promisesand few have made as much noise in the last decade as green coffee. Often marketed as the definitive panacea for weight loss, this product has flooded herbalists, pharmacies and supermarkets, making it available to anyone who wants to finally achieve weight loss without much effort. However, behind the intense marketing, there is hidden a biochemical reality that goes far beyond advertising slogans and that justifies part of their effect. Although a priori, when we talk about coffee to lose weight, we can go with the idea of ​​the extreme thermogenic effect or the extreme dose of caffeine that activates our metabolism, the reality is different. Here science has a clear answer about its real benefits, pointing to a specific compound that we sacrifice every morning in favor of flavor: chlorogenic acid. What is green coffee? To understand green coffee you do not have to travel to exotic plantations looking for a rare species that produces this product, since green coffee is purely and simply the coffee seed in its natural state, before being subjected to the roasting process which gives it its characteristic black color. Of course, we normally talk about the varieties Arabica coffee either Coffea canephora. If we put ourselves in the ‘normal’ situation, when we roast the coffee beans At temperatures around 200 degrees, Maillard reactions occur. A thermal process that is responsible for generating the characteristic intoxicating aroma, dark color and deep flavor that we can appreciate so much in the morning cup. However, these high temperatures produce a large destruction of bioactive compounds that can help us a lot in our daily lives. That is why logic prevails above all else here: if roasting degrades the healthiest compounds, then we eat it without roasting. And specifically, the element that is most important to us to preserve here is called chlorogenic acid, a powerful antioxidant ester, which is something that we want to preserve above all to reduce the hated oxidative stress that destroys our cells and accelerates aging. In this way, green coffee preserves the three characteristics of this compound intact, becoming an exceptional vehicle for introducing a series of phytochemicals into the body that gives it very interesting properties to achieve the benefits that we will see later. Properties of green coffee As we have said, the chemical composition of green coffee is a gold mine for pharmacognosy. By not being subjected to the thermal stress of roasting, it preserves certain components intact that make it a product with high functional potential. It has a lower amount of caffeine. Contrary to what intuition dictates, green coffee generally contains less than half the caffeine than a cup of conventional black coffee. This means that its stimulating effects on the central nervous system are much milder, which can be very interesting for those who are more sensitive to caffeine. In this way, by not generating such an aggressive alert peak, your consumers rarely need to apply the 90 minute rule after waking up to have your first cup and avoid cortisol shock. Chlorogenic acid. As we have mentioned before, it is the real star of the metabolic function of green coffee, since this compound formed by caffeic acid and quinic acid has led science to classify it into three main classes and that in green coffee it has a maximum concentration. High antioxidant capacity. Various analyzes of beans from different producing regions, including exhaustive studies on Mexican varieties, have confirmed that green coffee has a significantly higher amount of total phenols and a higher antioxidant capacity compared to its roasted counterpart. Presence of trigonelline. An alkaloid that is also better preserved in its raw state and that, according to various tests, collaborates in the regulation of glucose metabolism. What the science says about green coffee Scientific scrutiny on this product has been intense, especially after the proliferation of low-quality studies in the early 2010s, some of which, highly publicized, ended up being retracted by scientific journals due to methodological flaws. Today, the evidence is much more solid, mature and, above all, realistic. The most comprehensive systematic reviews, such as the one led by Tajik in 2017 that analyzed Nearly a hundred studies, both in vivo and in vitro, agree on a clear verdict: the chlorogenic acid present in green coffee is a powerful bioactive agent with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. But logically here science puts a brake on marketing campaigns, since green coffee does not produce a drastic transformation nor does it magically “melt” fat or rejuvenate in a snap, but it does improve different biomarkers of our metabolic health. In this way, we are not talking about something miraculous, but we are talking about something protective. Benefits of green coffee From all the scientific evidence, a compilation can be made of what this green coffee is used for on a daily basis and if it is really proven, since these are the benefits that enter our eyes and that they try to sell us to finally pay for green coffee. weight loss It is one of the most popular benefits that allows many people to take the step to start taking it, but the question we must ask ourselves here is: is green coffee really useful for losing weight? Here a study published in 2023 shed light on this issue by evaluating green coffee extract, providing at least 500 mg of chlorogenic acid daily to patients. The conclusion they drew was simply visual, as these patients had a significant, but modest, reduction of approximately 1.3 kg in the participants’ body weight. Another important piece of information was given to us in 2019. a second study which stated that the supplements had no measurable effect if consumed for less than four weeks. However, in long-term clinical trials using extracts with 70% CGA and less than 1% caffeine, reductions in body weight of up to 6% were documented, … Read more

regional chains like Froiz yes

by

For a long time now, talking about supermarkets in Spain has been equivalent to talking about Mercadona. The Valencian chain leads the sector with a business share that around 30% and is the spearhead of some of its most relevant trends, such as bet on the short assortmentthe white labelthe ready foods to eat and the tray as star format for the fresh ones. That does not mean that Juan Roig’s signature is the only one that indicates the path to follow. Another equally interesting trend can be found in the super regionals. In case there were any doubts, Froiz just reminded us. What has happened? That they have just transcended the billing and growth data of Froiz, a chain of stores based in Poio (Pontevedra) and present mainly in Galicia, Castilla y León, Castilla-La Mancha, Madrid and the north of Portugal. Said like this, it may not sound interesting (its weight in the sector is very inferior that of the large chains), but it is if we broaden the focus. Beyond the details of billing or profits, Froiz’s accounts confirm that regional chains keep the pulse in a sector in which only Mercadona, Carrefour and Lidl monopolized almost 43% of the entire pie last year, according to the latest data published by the consulting firm NielsenIQ. And how has it been? Relatively good. In 2025 Froiz reached a business volume of 970 million euroswhich translates into 3.2% more than in 2024 (940 million) and leaves the Galician group one step closer to the psychological barrier of the 1 billion. Its turnover also rises constantly. In 2024 it had already registered 3.1% and in 2023, in a scenario marked by inflation, it reached shoot up 11%. These are figures much lower than those managed by Mercadona, which in 2025 invoiced 41,858 millionbut they still reflect growth. Did it only grow in sales? No. The Pontevedra-based chain also expanded its workforce by 3.7%, placing it at 7,000 employeesand expanded its network of points of sale. Right now sum 268 spread across Galicia, Castilla y León, Castilla-La Mancha, Community of Madrid and four districts of Portugal. There are half a dozen more establishments than the previous year, a growth that has been achieved thanks in part to the acquisition of several points of sale in León and investments in the capital. The firm basically works through “super” format locals (249), although it also manages seven hypermarketsa dozen cash & carry and has another 80 franchised stores. Why is it relevant? We still lack data from other food chains to have a general picture (for example those of Gadisa and Eroskidirect competitors in Galicia), but Froiz’s results connect with a trend that comes from long ago: the resistance of regional companies against the advance of giants food, such as the Carrefour, Lidl, Dia and especially Mercadona groups. Only the Valencian company reached a quota in 2025 29.5% after registering a year-on-year growth of almost half a point. Is there more data? In a recent report Regarding the sector, the consulting firm Worldpanel by Numerator (the former Kantar) in fact highlights two major trends. The first is the growth of “short assortment” chains, which facilitate the shopping experience by limiting supply and focusing above all on prices (often betting on their own private labels). The second trend that the study highlights is the behavior of regional supermarkets, which, although they have not had as good a year as previous ones, still represent an important player in the market. “In addition to the short assortment, the 2025 balance of distribution leaves us with other focuses of interest, such as regional chains, which have shown symptoms of deceleration. They grow together by 0.4 percentage points (pp) to the current 18.5%. However, they are slowed down in the second half of the year in the packaged food part, although in fresh products they continue to be differential,” comment Bernardo Rodilla, one of the directors of Worpanel by Numerator. What does that mean? Its growth as a block may have been modest (0.4 pp, according to Worldpanel), but it maintains the trend of recent years. The same consulting firm estimates that in 2019 regional supermarkets accumulated a share of 15.4%a percentage that had increased in 2024 up to 17.7%. Its latest balance already speaks of 18.5%. They are not the only signs that tell us about their resistance. Other reports have reported its ability to increase profits and muscle commercial (including sales area) in recent years. How do they grow then? Just a year ago FRS gave some keys that help understand how food sales are being redistributed and, above all, which branches are coming out worst. Specifically, it pointed to two: the “specialist channels” and the hypermarkets. Large chains and firms like Froiz may be growing, but this expansion coincides with a loss of strength of traditional businesses such as fruit shops, bakeries, butchers or fishmongers. This last case is particularly interesting, since it coincides with a historical crisis in fish consumption. The Fedepesca employers’ association estimates that since 2007 some 350 fishmongers traditional every year. Why are we going to regionals? The other big question. A recent OCU report shows that seven out of ten Chains most valued by consumers are precisely regional. Its attractiveness (and resistance) responds to a sum of factors: bets on fresh products, local merchandise and direct and personal treatment with specialists such as fruit sellers, butchers and fishmongers. Exactly opposite that happens in other large chains in the sector. The regional ones also stand out for their presence in neighborhoods and towns, brand recognition and commercial policies that usually prioritize loyalty, for example through points programs, raffles or sponsorships. There are those who simply consider them the successors from neighborhood stores. Images | Froiz In Xataka | Years ago we feared that an “apocalypse” would sweep through shopping centers. In Spain, exactly the opposite is happening.

What is Zapier, what workflows can you do by connecting applications with this platform and what is its price

by

We are going to tell you what Zapier is, a popular platform to configure workflows or workflows and create automation. It is an alternative to services like Make.com o IFTTT, specialized in connecting applications and/or artificial intelligence to create automation or AI agents. We are going to start by explaining to you what exactly this platform is, and then we will try to tell you in a summarized way what you will be able to do with it. And we will end by talking about its prices and its free plan, so you can know what it will cost to use it depending on what you want to do with it. What is Zapier Zapier is a platform that allows you create automations between applications and services each other. It does it in a very visual way and without the need for you to write code. It has support for more than 8,000 applications and services, including AI systems. You will configure automations with the ones you choose so that they work together automatically without you having to intervene every time you want them to do something. The way this platform works is create step chainsalso known as workflows. In each of these steps you can configure an action by determining which service or application you want to do it, which can be several steps with the same app or with a different one. Think of this as a chain. First you take a step that does one thing, and with the result of this you take a second step that does another, and thus you create a chain of interactions. You will also be able to make branches so that, depending on whether the result of a previous step is one way or another, the sequence goes one way or another doing different things. Each workflow on this platform is called Zap, and is made up of two fundamental elements. one is the triggerwhich is what we define when and why the automation is executed. And then there are the actionswhich can be one or more, and which are the tasks that Zapier executes in response to the trigger. For example, you can set up a Zap to run every time you receive an email in your Gmail account, and set up steps that automatically save it to Google Drive, and then send you a notification via Slack. With this, you will have configured the initial trigger, the received email, and then two actions one after the other. The interface of this service is very intuitive and is designed for non-technical users. Its strong point compared to other similar platforms such as Make is precisely the ease of usealthough that also implies somewhat less flexibility for very complex flows. What you can do with Zapier Zapier has as many possibilities as there are applications you can link to. There are so many, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed at first. You will be able to automate repetitive tasks such as copy or sync data between platformscreate tasks automatically or synchronize databases. You can also manage emails and forms by automatically saving some data, sending automated responses or filtering emails. In general, you should know what you can do simple automations and even with AIlinking any artificial intelligence model after obtaining its API or using the platform’s integrated AI. Zapier also allows you to automatically post to social networks, send notifications to messaging apps like Telegram or Slack when something happens in another app, save email attachments to the cloud, create calendar events, or generate periodic reports. If you don’t know where to start you have two options. Have the integrations pagewhere you choose two services that you want to link and it gives you proposals for what you can do with them. And then you have the templates pagewhere you can find complex workflow ideas made in Zapier. How much does Zapier cost? Zapier has a basic free plan which is used to start experimenting with it. It allows you to create two-step Zaps, use most apps (although not all), use its AI to create automations, and perform one hundred executions per month. Therefore, although it only allows two-step automations, it is good to start getting familiar with its interface. Your payment plan costs 26.54 euros per monthand in it you can now create multi-step Zaps, use all the available applications and perform 750 actions per month. It also allows you to connect AI bots, something the free version doesn’t have, and basically use all of its features. And then, for 91.60 euros per month you have a team account for up to 25 users with 2,000 actions per month, where in addition to everything in its paid version you can also share Zaps and connections between all team members. These were the prices of the platform itself, but Using AI agents or Chatbots has an additional price There are free plans with 400 agent activities per month or limited AI models, but if you need more you will have to make other payments. Furthermore, if you want a larger share quota for the price of the platform you will also have to pay more. In Xataka Basics | The best AI agents that are faster and easier to use to do tasks for you without complications or long installations

to remove protection

by

Michael Colosi is a young technology entrepreneur who, like many other millionairesmoved to southwest Florida attracted by the good weather and the low taxes of the state. In March 2024, Colosi bought two hectares of land in Punta Gorda with the intention of building a house and settling there permanently. What he did not imagine is that, before building a single wall of his future mansion, the county was going to present him with a bill for $118,527. The reason: the possibility that a protected bluebird could nest in their plot. The squatter of a bird. That bird is the Florida scrub-jay, the only bird whose species exists exclusively in that state. For this reason, it has been classified as a threatened species since 1987 under the Endangered Species Act and its fate has been caught at the center of a legal battle that, according to expertscould have consequences for hundreds of other species throughout the US. One of the consequences of this protected species status is that Charlotte County can apply a fee in sections to landowners who want to build in areas considered potential habitat for the bird. In the case of Colosi, taking into account the surface area of ​​its land and the fact that it is located in one of the nesting areas of this bird, the fee amounts to $118,527. Lawsuit for an unfair rate. This rate is applied to the entire plot, regardless of whether it is going to be built on the entire property or only part of it. In fact, his own claim document presented by the millionaire indicates that, if his property had only about 280 square meters less, the applicable rate would be $52,696. That is, less than half for going down to a lower section. Colosi maintains that the system is arbitrary and unconstitutional and that the county has not even checked to see if there are jays on its land. However, he cannot appeal or reduce the rate under any circumstances. Jamie Scudera, the county’s project manager, responded in an email to Colosi that “Your only alternative would be to not buy anything in a jay zone, because there is no other option other than our plan at this time.” Florida scrub jay Two arguments for a historical case. Colosi filed a federal lawsuit in October 2024 with the aim of appealing the fee, but the case has implications that go beyond discussing the amount of the fee. This lawsuit launches two legal arguments that, if successful, they would change the landscape of environmental protection in the United States. The first argument questions that the rate is proportionate and demands that it, at least, be directly related to the real impact of the planned construction. The second, and more controversial, is the argument that the Florida scrub jay should not be protected by federal legislation because it lives only in one state and does not affect interstate commerce which, according to the Pacific Legal Foundation that supports the millionaire, exceeds powers of Congress under the commerce clause of the Constitution. A bird without “economic value” that moves tourists from all over the country. The lawsuit includes a claim that has raised eyebrows among biologists and conservationists: that the Florida scrub jay has “no commercial or economic value.” Wildlife defenders refute this thesis with concrete data. Aaron Bloom, attorney for Earthjustice, points out that more than 1,000 people outside of Florida used the app eBird from Cornell University to record jay sightings only in 2024. Biologists from Yale, Harvard, Cornell and Princeton have visited the Archbold Biological Station expressly to study the species, and Audubon Florida organizes bird-watching tours that bring visitors from all over the country to Florida to observe it. The lawsuit’s argument is that, living only in Florida, the jay cannot affect interstate commerce and therefore does not deserve federal protection. The contradiction that conservationists point out is more than evident: under that logic, a species present in several states would be protected by the law, but one so localized that it only exists in a single territory would be unprotected precisely because it is rarer. The weight of what is at stake. According to Bloom, Defenders of Wildlife has documented 1,229 threatened species in the same situation, so their situation could also change if they allow the Florida millionaire to continue with his lawsuit to save a few thousand dollars. Charlotte County records show that at least 15 jays have been sighted in the Colosi neighborhood in the last year, and that hundreds of homeowners have paid protection fees without question over the last eleven years. The parcel’s own cadastral file warned with a note before the purchase: “The value of the land may be affected by the scrub jay habitat.” So, in theory, the millionaire was informed of the situation before purchasing the plot. What remains in doubt is whether he understood the meaning of that note. The Pacific Legal Foundation, which supports the millionaire in his lawsuit, already led the battle two decades ago to eliminate the bald eagle protection When the bird lived in multiple states, the main difference with the case of the jay is that this species can only live in Florida and has nowhere to go if it loses its habitat. In Xataka | Of all the places there were to build a $400,000 house, this millionaire chose the most unusual: in a tree Image | Flickr (FWC Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Dan Irizarry), unsplash (Alejandra Cifre González)

The NYT claims to have found Satoshi Nakamoto and the evidence is as conclusive as ever. That is, little or nothing

by

On October 31, 2008, someone calling himself Satoshi Nakamoto posted a document nine-page document that proposed a decentralized electronic money system. That was the birth of bitcoin and a phenomenon that has shaken the foundations of the modern economy, but no one has ever been able to know who was really behind that pseudonym. And no matter what they say in The New York Times, we still don’t know. Adam Back. The journalist John Carreyrou became famous for uncover he Theranos fraudand in a new and in-depth investigation published in The New York Times claims to have discovered the real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. According to their data, that person is Adam Back, a well-known 55-year-old British cryptographer who is currently the CEO of the Blockstream company. Back denies all these claims, and we fear that this investigation will once again end up like the rest of the previous attempts. He is not just any suspect. In 1997, Back invented HashCash, a mathematical puzzle-solving system that Satoshi explicitly cited in his white paper and that in fact became the basis of the bitcoin mining mechanism. He was an active member of groups of anarchist cryptographers who had been trying to create digital money for decades. And between 1997 and 1999 he published messages on Internet forums that accurately described almost all the fundamental elements of the system. That was like an instruction manual for creating bitcoin, but created a decade before Satoshi Nakamoto published it. Analysis based…on how Satoshi wrote? The methodology followed by Carreyrou is striking. He worked with an AI expert from the NYT to collect messages from crypto mailing lists between 1992 and 2008, merged them into a database with 134,000 messages from 620 different users, and applied three methods of analyzing those messages. In the analysis, it was seen that the British spelling, the same hyphen errors in some terms, the confusion between “it” and “its” or the use of two spaces between sentences pointed to Back writing the same as Satoshi in his document. All circumstantial. This style analysis led Back to be identified as the clear candidate among a group of 12 “suspects.” However, the experts who carried out the analysis were not entirely sure and, for example, another of the traditional candidates in these investigations, Hal Finney, was almost tied in these style matches. Back himself indicated that anyone who writes about cryptography is going to sound just like the rest of the community. Back denies the major. Carreyrou ended up traveling to a bitcoin conference in El Salvador to meet with Back and explain his findings. During their two-hour conversation, Back denied being Satoshi on several occasions. The journalist claimed to have caught Back making a mistake when he stated that “I’m better with code than words”, something that Satoshi Nakamoto also said in a late 2008 message on one of the mailing lists analyzed. Back said he was simply making a general observation about programmers, and the truth is that all of Carreyrou’s evidence was inconclusive. Only Satoshi can prove that he is Satoshi. The bitcoin user community often says that “we are all Satoshi”, in reference to the fact that revealing the real identity of the creator of bitcoin is not relevant. The only way to do this would be for Satoshi himself to reveal himself and prove to be that person by transferring bitcoins from one of Satoshi Nakamoto’s original wallets – where he houses nothing less than 1.1 million bitcoins. Many have tried to unmask Satoshi. They have all failed. We are facing another attempt to reveal the real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. It is neither the first nor probably the last. In recent years we have seen several more: Neither then nor now has anything really been proven. The mystery continues. Image | Wikipedia | Michael Fortsch In Xataka | The creator of Bitcoin disappeared 13 years ago. Now your account has just received a million-dollar transfer

Europe cannot be a “technological vassal of the United States”, and the CEO of Mistral is clear about the path

by

Mistral is emerging as the pillar of European artificial intelligence. A few weeks ago we said that the French startup had raised another 830 million dollars to create AI data centers in Europe. Arthur Mensch is the CEO of the company and, for some time now, he is establishing himself as one of the powerful voices within the initiative of European technological sovereignty. His new warning is that Europe cannot be a “vassal state” of the United States and he has published a roadmap so that Europe leads AI. It won’t be easy. European swerve. There are those who complain that everything cannot be politics, but really politics is something that permeates many layers and the European turn in search of technological sovereignty has a lot to do with this. It is something that has coincided with the return of Donald Trump because Europe has realized that, between threats and the “I invaded Greenland”, can’t trust his ally. With American technology companies very involved in the ideology set by their Government, there is a demand for sovereign European alternatives that do not depend on American Big Tech nor how they may process your sensitive data. What happens with rockets, satellites, chips and even with Microsoft Office. And AI is no exception. Measures. That’s right where it comes into play. Mistral. As the greatest exponent of European AI (within the Generative AIsince we also have the suite from the Spanish Freepik as one of the most important companies in this field), Mistral and its CEO are voices with a certain weight when it comes to talking about what seems to be the only topic of conversation in recent months. And Mensch has clear that Europe cannot be a “vassal” of US technology companies. For this reason, they have published “European AI: a roadmap to lead it”, a long document in which it urges the institutions of the European Union to speed up procedures and permits to take advantage of its single market position of more than 450 million people and combine the talent of different countries at the service of AI. From European AI, of course. The premises are clear: Attract and retain talent. Unlock the full potential of the single market. Embrace European AI on all economic fronts. Empower Europe with critical infrastructure for AI. 80%. Each of the measures has a series of points that detail what the optimal way to proceed would be (according to Mistral) to achieve European leadership and stop depending on foreign technology. And one of the points to keep in mind is that Europe has the possibility of commanding, but it faces a devastating fact: 80% of the digital infrastructure continues to depend on non-EU providers. To put it down: if a ministry needs an office suite, turn to Google or Microsoft. If a hospital needs an AI, goes to ChatGPT or Huawei. If we limit ourselves to AI, Mistral estimates that only 20% of EU companies have adopted AI and that only 11% of SMEs take advantage of its potential. slap on the wrist to regulatory Europe. What they point out is that this situation makes us vulnerable to extraterritorial controls that put the strategic autonomy of the member countries in check. They defend that this roadmap is not a theoretical exercise, but rather something practical that is based on three key principles: Action over theory. Unity against the fragmentation of each of the governments. And the most important: the speed is questionable. We must find quick ways to attract talent and capital so that the most innovative in Europe are not left behind, trapped in regulations that take time. Ambition. They warn that it is something with potential not only for Mistral, but for the entire ecosystem, an ecosystem in which Mistral is already very, very well positioned. Part of the 830 million they have raised will go to their facilities near Paris where there will be 13,800 NVIDIA GB3000 chips (You can’t become independent from NVIDIA…), but it won’t be the only one. By 2027 they hope to have a €1.2 billion facility in Sweden with 23 MW of computing capacity. In total, they hope to achieve 200 MW of capacity by the end of next year. It is very, very far from China and, above all, from the United States, but although the distance is enormous, it is an important step. The B side of the matter. Now, everything has a twist, and the twist of this enormous amount of money is that this round is not venture capital, but debt financing. The main French banks have lent this money to create data centers and, while the risk capital is not returned, the debt is, and with interest. It doesn’t matter if Mistral’s move turns out well or not, even if the AI ​​bubble bursts: the banks that have lent the money expect to receive it with the aforementioned interest regardless of how business goes. It is an added pressure for the company, but also a sign that they trust in what they are building. In Xataka | ChatGPT’s milestone is not being a good AI: it is having become one of the biggest attention grabbers in history

Anthropic says Claude Mythos is too powerful to go public. The question is if this is nothing more than “the wolf is coming”

by

Claude Mythos Preview It is the best AI model ever created. We don’t say it, Anthropic says it, but almost no one else can say it because only a select group of companies has access to said model. The cybersecurity capabilities of the model appear to be astonishingbut more and more experts say that although Mythos is better than its predecessors, it is not the revolutionary leap that Anthropic seems to propose. Is that way of launching the model just an effective way of creating hype? Beware the Anthropic speech. The well-known entrepreneur and analyst Gary Marcus recently gave three reasons why, according to him, the launch of Mythos is not as revolutionary as Anthropic wants us to see. I cited tweets from software engineers and cybersecurity experts who cast doubt on Anthropic’s claims. The company published a study on the capabilities of Claude Mythos Preview that seemed to make it an extraordinary tool for the field of cybersecurity, but at the same time it was so powerful that it could be very dangerous if it fell into the wrong hands. Isn’t that a big deal? Among Claude Mythos’ achievements, Anthropic highlighted how he had found vulnerabilities in Firefox 147. But in reality many of the flaws were basically variations of the same two bugs. If you removed them from the equation, Mythos’ effectiveness rate at finding new exploits dropped a lot, even below Opus 4.6. Anthropic did not hide that fact, of course, but it makes this capacity, for example, not seem so striking. An X user also criticized the use of Cybench as a cybersecurity benchmark when Opus 4.6 almost completely surpassed it. For him, the choice of some of the Anthropic tests was debatable because they were not a challenge to current models. Other models can do the same. The co-founder and CEO of Hugging Face, Clement Delangue, stated that Mythos was no big deal. Their argument: they had used small, cheap open models, isolated the relevant code from some examples of the vulnerabilities found by Mythos, and they found the same problems which had already detected the Anthropic model. According to the Epoch Capabilities Index, which measures the capacity of AI models by combining several benchmarks, the leap that Mythos has taken is striking and “departs” from the progressive line of its predecessors. Source: Anthropic. Observer bias. But here it should be noted that in those analyzes they knew where to look because Mythos had already found those problems. We are dealing with observer bias, and in fact the Hugging Face document makes it clear that they even gave him specific clues such as “consider integer overflow”) to find those bugs. And on this observation, another one: Hugging Face does not say that a small model can replace Mythos on its own, but that it can be very good by giving it the appropriate code fragment. Mythos seems more capable of blindly complex security breaches, but it is a huge model and that is why it has greater capacity. Or what is the same: Mythos is better because it has the size, design and resources to be better. Fear, uncertainty, doubt? The language used by Anthropic in this advertisement could be considered to some extent a clear use of FUD (“Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt” -> “Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt”) as a marketing technique. It is a resource that has been seen in the past, and for example OpenAI already said in 2019—years before the launch of ChatGPT—that GPT-2 was too dangerous for a public launch. Obviously it wasn’t, but that certainly served to create expectation about the true capacity of the model. It’s better, but it may not be revolutionary. The results of the benchmarks that Anthropic published already made it clear that although there are very notable jumps in some tests, in others the evolution is much less striking. Claude Mythos was not the best at everything, and now analysts appear who contrast that data with other metrics. For example, with the Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI) from Epoch AI, the startup that has one of the most reputable benchmarks of the industry. And according to this index, Claude Mythos is above his rivals, but not for long. The wolf is coming. The truth is that the launch of Claude Mythos Preview has been really striking and the documents that accompanied that document tell us about a really capable AI model. The problem is that it is impossible to verify it because only a few companies have access to it and can test it. Without that public availability the only thing we can do is trust (or not) what Anthropic tells us, and that is the point: it is not clear that we should do it. The company is interested in us buying this discourse, obviously, but without an independent analysis it is impossible to verify these statements. In Xataka | Anthropic has become the darling of AI and has sought a partner to guarantee its future. It’s not the one we thought

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.