Millionaires, tycoons and presidents: Guide to who was and where at Trump’s inauguration

The packed dais in the Capitol Rotunda on Inauguration Day featured four of the five richest men in the world, five U.S. presidents, technology and business magnates, and two foreign leaders in prime locations. Donald Trump’s inauguration was attended by traditional, unprecedented and unorthodox guests, from Supreme Court judges to the vice president of China and the director of TikTok, an application that the United States authorities have identified as a risk to national security, along with the person Trump has chosen to lead the intelligence community. There were also members of the president’s family and other familiar faces in Trump’s circle. Lawmakers mostly sat across from Trump, watching the new president take the oath of office. Here are who was on the stand and who they sat next to. 1. Shou Zi Chew, the CEO of TikTok, was sitting next to Tulsi Gabbard, whom Trump has nominated to be director of national intelligence. Trump intervened this weekend in an attempt to stop a ban on TikTok, which is seen as a potential national security threat. The president has credited the social network with helping him win last year’s election, but the platform faces a ban if the China-based parent company does not find a buyer approved by Washington. 2. Joe Rogan, one of the world’s most popular podcasters, sat down for a three-hour interview with Trump in the final stretch of the campaign and ultimately endorsed him a day before the election. Trump has expressed his gratitude to him. 3. A group of billionaires and tech tycoons sat in the same row. They included Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg; the founder of Amazon, Jeff Bezos; to the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai and the CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, the richest man in the world. They were seated behind Trump’s wife, Melania, and their children, but in front of several of his Cabinet nominees. Musk, who has grown closer to Trump since the election, sat closest to Trump. Bernard Arnault, CEO of French magnate LVMH, the world’s largest luxury goods seller whose brands include Louis Vuitton and Christian Dior, was on the opposite side of the stand. 4. Barron Trump is Trump’s youngest son. The president has acknowledged his contribution to the online campaign, saying it introduced him to internet personalities he had never met before. Barron Trump is now 18 and a freshman business student at New York University, but he will have a room in the White House. 5. Kai Trump, one of Trump’s granddaughters, is a social media influencer and avid golfer. Kai Trump is only 17 years old but has grown in popularity over the past year, taking the stage at the Republican National Convention and speaking briefly at a rally over the weekend. She is the daughter of Donald Trump Jr., who has helped her father with some of his elections and is seen as an enforcer of loyalty in his circle. 6. Miriam Adelson and John Paulson were among the Trump campaign’s biggest donors and got prime seats at the ceremony alongside the next White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles. Paulson, a billionaire investor, hosted a fundraiser in Palm Beach, Florida, that set a record for a single event, adding $50.5 million to the campaign last April. Adelson is co-owner of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks and the widow of casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. She is a major Trump supporter and, along with Zuckerberg, hosted another inaugural event on Monday. 7. Former Presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, George W. Bush and outgoing President Joe Biden also received prime seats. All of his wives, except former first lady Michelle Obama, were also sitting there. Michelle Obama had previously announced that she would skip the swearing-in ceremony. He didn’t give a reason. 8. In an unprecedented move, Trump invited foreign leaders to the inauguration, and they, too, got coveted seats at the ceremony. The president of Argentina, Javier Milei, was sitting next to the Italian prime minister, Giorgia Meloni. There was also China’s vice president, Han Zheng, whom President Xi Jinping sent to represent him. China’s ambassador to the United States, Xie Feng, was also nearby.

Trump 2.0: Starts his reign of terror and chaos

The inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 47th president of the United States was like waiting for a Category 5 hurricane, and I say this knowingly because I have experienced several cyclones. That anxiety and certainty of knowing that the devastation will be immense, especially for immigrants and their citizen and permanent resident family members. But also for the country’s economy, for our moral fiber and for our democracy. Trump wasted no time in activating his reign of terror among immigrants and like a good would-be autocrat, he wants to govern by decree and abuses his powers. For example, he declared a “national emergency” on the border with Mexico to deploy the military to stop the “invasion” of undocumented immigrants despite the sustained reduction in arrests on the strip in recent months. He also began the process to deny birthright citizenship to babies born in the United States to undocumented parents. More than twenty states, cities, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued to prevent the implementation of the order, calling it unconstitutional. Among the immigration executive orders are the reestablishment of the ‘Remain in Mexico’ program that requires asylum seekers to remain in the neighboring country while they wait for their appointment before the immigration courts in the United States. He took other steps to undermine the asylum system: He suspended refugee resettlement for at least four months. And it eliminated the CBP One application that allowed asylum seekers to request their appointments virtually to avoid chaos at the border. The application was instrumental in reducing border crossings under the outgoing administration of Democrat Joe Biden. ‘Stay in Mexico’ worsened the crisis in the strip as thousands of migrants, from individuals to entire families, slept outdoors in inhumane conditions due to the lack of shelters. Many were victims of crimes as they were at the mercy of drug trafficking cartels. Trump will also end the practice of ‘catch and release’, which allows immigrants to be released into the United States while they await their hearings in immigration court. As part of his plan to eliminate birthright citizenship, he places obstacles, such as requiring the relevant agencies not to issue passports or Social Security cards unless one of the minor’s parents is a citizen or permanent resident. Trump knows that he cannot eliminate the 14th Amendment with a stroke of the pen, that it requires a constitutional amendment and that his plan will be challenged in court, but he wants to show the MAGA movement that he is “keeping” his campaign promises. He also invoked the Alien Enemies Act, to designate cartels and certain gangs as terrorist organizations. The 1798 law, which has only been applied three times and in times of war, allows the detention, relocation or deportation of nationals of the enemy country of the United States for reasons of national security. Regarding deportations, Trump declared that “all illegal entry will immediately stop, and we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens to the places from which they came.” As of this writing, there have been no confirmed raids under Trump. But it rescinded a memo prohibiting such operations in “sensitive” places such as churches, schools, courts and shelters. Trump eliminated humanitarian parole for migrants from Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Haiti. The executive orders reflect the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which provided Trump and his team with a roadmap for a highly extremist agenda, not only on immigration but in energy, education, labor rights, civil rights, and other areas. . What is fearful is not only that Republicans control the executive and legislative branches, and have the balance tilted in their favor in the judicial branch. They also had the first Trump administration as a rehearsal and this time these measures are written to try to survive appeals in court. Immigration extremism is the tip of the iceberg in this government since an outgoing president, Biden, issued preventive pardons to his relatives and public officials out of fear that they could be persecuted and accused of “something” because Trump considers them his political enemies. Ironically, while Trump calls immigrants “criminals,” he pardons 1,500 of those convicted or prosecuted for the violent attack on the federal Capitol on January 6, 2021. Like a major Category 5 hurricane, Trump and his extremist policies promise severe damage that will test our resilience, our humanity, our Constitution, and the neutrality of our judicial system.

US House approves immigration detention law that could be the first that Trump enacts

WASHINGTON— The US House of Representatives on Wednesday gave final approval to a bill that requires the detention of migrants who are in the country without permission and who have been accused of theft and violent crimes, the first measure that President Donald Trump can enact it, after Congress—with some bipartisan support—moved quickly in line with the president’s plans to toughen measures against illegal immigration. The passage of the Laken Riley Act, named after a Georgia nursing student who was murdered last year by a Venezuelan, shows how dramatically the political debate over immigration has shifted to the right following Trump’s election victory. . Immigration policy has often been one of the most entrenched issues in Congress, but a crucial group of 46 politically vulnerable Democrats joined Republicans to pass the strict proposal by a vote count of 263 in favor and 156 against. . “For decades, it has been nearly impossible for our government to agree on solutions to problems at our border and within our country,” said Republican Senator Katie Britt. He noted that it is likely to be the “most significant immigration bill” that Congress has passed in nearly three decades. However, the bill will require a massive increase in the capabilities of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), but does not include any new funding. Meanwhile, the new president has issued a series of executive orders aimed at sealing the border with Mexico to immigration and ultimately deporting millions of migrants who lack permanent legal status in the United States. On Wednesday, Trump also canceled refugee resettlement and his administration has said it intends to prosecute local law enforcement officials who do not comply with his new immigration policies. Republican congressional leaders have made clear that they intend to follow the same path, although their biggest challenge will be finding a way to approve funding to actually implement Trump’s strict plans. “What he’s doing is starting what will ultimately be our legislative agenda,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson. House Republicans initially passed the legislation last year with the support of 37 Democrats in a move intended as a political rebuke to then-President Joe Biden’s handling of the southern border. He then languished in the Democratic-controlled Senate. This year, Republicans, now in control of both houses of Congress, have made this their top priority. When it came before the Senate, 12 Democrats voted in favor of the measure, and when the House voted on a version of the bill earlier this month, 48 Democrats supported it. A majority of adults in the United States favor deporting immigrants convicted of violent crimes, according to a recent poll by the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and The Associated Press. However, only about 37% of U.S. adults favor deporting migrants in the country illegally who have not been convicted of a crime. “While the bill is not perfect, it sends a clear message that we think criminals should be deported,” said Rep. Tom Suozzi, a New York Democrat who has urged his party to support stricter enforcement of the law. immigration law. Under the bill, federal authorities would be required to detain any migrant arrested or charged with crimes such as shoplifting. The scope of the proposal was expanded in the Senate to also include those accused of assaulting a police officer or crimes that injure or cause the death of someone. The bill also gives state attorneys general standing to sue the federal government for damages caused by federal immigration decisions. This gives states new power in immigration policy when they have already been trying to counter presidential decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations. Democrats unsuccessfully tried to have that provision removed from the bill in the Senate, saying it would inject even more uncertainty and partisanship into immigration policy. Ultimately, even the Trump administration will likely struggle to implement the new requirements unless Congress follows up later this year with funding. Republicans are currently planning how to push their priorities through Congress through a party-line process known as budget reconciliation. They have estimated the cost of funding Trump’s border and deportation priorities at approximately $100 billion. Trump has “established the largest domestic logistics undertaking of our lifetimes, which is the deportation of the majority of aliens who are in the United States illegally,” said Ken Cuccinelli, who led U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services during the Trump’s first term, to a Senate panel recently. Cuccinelli noted that it would require an increase in immigration judges, prosecutors and other staff, but Trump has also paved the way for using military assets, bases and other resources to carry out mass deportations. The Department of Homeland Security has estimated that the Laken Riley Act would cost $26.9 billion in the first year to implement, including an increase of 110,000 ICE detention beds. Most Democrats criticized the lack of funding in the bill as evidence that it is a piecemeal approach that would do little to fix problems in the immigration system but would burden federal authorities with new requirements. “The authors of the bill stated that it would result in the arrest and detention of dangerous criminals, but it will not because it is a completely unfunded mandate,” said Democratic Senator Chris Murphy. Others expressed concerns that the bill would deprive migrants, including minors or beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, of due process rights. Senator Alex Padilla said federal authorities would now be forced to prioritize detaining migrants arrested for minor crimes such as shoplifting, rather than those who commit serious crimes. Overall, there is no evidence that migrants are more likely to commit violent crimes. Several studies have found that immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than those born in the United States. Groups that advocate for restrictive immigration policies dispute or dismiss those findings. But Republicans pointed to the bill’s namesake, Laken Riley, and how she was murdered by a Venezuelan migrant who had previously been arrested by local authorities but released while … Read more

Olympic medalist was pardoned by Donald Trump after assault on the Capitol: “I regret it”

Joe Biden came out of the White House granting pardons and donald trump He arrived doing the same. The 47th president granted a pardon to 1,600 people who attacked the Capitol in January 2021. Among them, former swimmer and Olympic medalist Klete Keller. Keller actively participated in the taking of the Capitol when trump lost the election to Biden and denounced alleged electoral fraud. In an interview with Washington Post He revealed his feelings after learning of the pardon. “It’s an incredible feeling of relief,” he said. Keller He faced a 10-month sentence that was reduced to six months under house arrest and three months on probation. He also had to perform 360 hours of community work. “It didn’t seem real to me. And when I woke up this morning, I thought, ‘Oh my God. This is over. I no longer have to contact my probation officer. “It is an incredible feeling of relief,” he revealed. Keller He stated that he participated in the taking of the Capitolbut without being aware of the damage this caused. “I know my actions angered and caused harm to millions of Americans. I told this to the judge and I meant it. I acted without thinking. “I didn’t stop or take time to reflect,” he said. Klete Keller in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, in Washington.Credit: Justice Department | AP Likewise, he acknowledged that he is grateful for the decision of trumpwhich considers a second opportunity to move forward. Klete Keller born in Vegas. Currently, he is 42 years old and retired. It was part of the era of glorious swimmers alongside Michael Phelps, Lochte and Vanderkaay. He even participated in the 4×200 relay. The trio broke the 4×200 world record at the World Championships. Melbourne 2007. He was also a reliever for Ian Thorpe in the Athens Olympic Games in the 4×200. To his credit he has four gold medals, one silver and three bronze medals. In the Sydney Olympics and Athens He won the bronze and silver medal in the 4×200 freestyle. In Beijing won the gold. Klete Keller reacts after a heat of the men’s 4×200 meter freestyle relay during the swimming competitions at the National Aquatics Center at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games in Beijing.Credit: Thomas Kienzle | AP Keep reading:· Trump pardons Ross Ulbricht, convicted of operating the illegal black market website Silk Road· Capitol attacker rejected Trump’s pardon and called it an “insult” to the police· Biden granted presidential pardon to New York immigrant rights leader Ravi Ragbir

Trudeau asks provinces for “unity” to confront and respond to Trump

After the Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau warned that there will be a strong response from his country if Donald Trump imposes 25% tariffs, Now he called for “unity” to the provincial heads of government. The Prime Minister’s Office revealed after the meeting that Trudeau and the provincial heads of government “shared details of recent conversations” they have had with US politicians and senior officials. “The prime minister insisted that a strong unitary approach is the best way to advance Canadian interests and establish a productive relationship with the incoming administration.”noted the Prime Minister’s Office. The prime minister, who will leave office in March, said his Government is prepared to “support and compensate” Canadian citizens and businesses if Trump proceeds with tariffs that harm the economy. But he also promised strong retaliation. The Canadian government has said the tariffs would be “devastating” for the Canadian economy and could destroy hundreds of thousands of jobs in the country. “The possibility of unjustified 25% tariffs, unilaterally imposed by the US against its closest ally, is a matter of serious concern,” the Trudeau government added. Trudeau already met last week with the heads of government of the 10 provinces and three territories of Canada to discuss Trump’s arrival at the White House. During the meeting, it was agreed to hold an annual joint meeting in the face of the crisis caused by the new American president. It is the first time in Canadian history that the prime minister and the provincial heads of government have held weekly meetings. Canada has already announced investments of $900 million to reinforce its border with its neighbor, one of Trump’s initial demands. Canada, the United States and Mexico have had a free trade agreement for years, currently called T-MEC. Keep reading:

Trump sends 1,500 troops to the border to stop immigration

The president’s government Donald Trump is sending 1,500 soldiers to the southern borderas part of his immigration plan and security in the region. “This is something that President Trump advocated for in his campaign. “The American people have been waiting for a moment like this, for our Department of Defense to really take national security seriously,” said press secretary Karoline Leavitt. The Pentagon will soon begin the deployment of troopsas part of the national emergency at the border, according to the executive order signed by Trump on Monday. These active-duty forces join about 2,500 National Guard troops already operating on the border. The action is part of the executive order “Securing Our Borders,” which orders the Department of Defense to coordinate efforts with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). “The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security will take all appropriate and lawful measures to deploy sufficient personnel along the southern border of the United States to ensure complete operational control,” the order says. There are other parts of Trump’s decision that have not been implemented, but could be detailed later or with the deployment of troops. “(All appropriate measures will be taken to deploy and construct temporary and permanent physical barriers to ensure complete operational control of the southern border of the United States,” says the document signed at the White House. Trump has signed several executive orders related to immigration, from which actions by DHS and its agencies have been derived, such as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office, which announced operations even in ‘sensitive areas’, as well as processes of accelerated deportation. A CBS News report indicates that the Trump Administration seeks to have up to 10,000 military personnel guarding the border. Keep reading:· With Democratic support, Laken Riley Law against immigrants advances· Tom Homan on mass deportation: “ICE agents from all over the country will be on the streets from the beginning”· Ted Cruz focuses deportations on criminals when speaking at Hispanic gala: “Take your bags and go”

What is the message of the letter that Biden left for Trump in a drawer in the White House?

Before giving up the presidency, Joe Biden decided to write a few lines dedicated to Donald Trump in a document placed in one of the drawers of the desk where the Republican now works. The day after his presidential inauguration, The New York tycoon thanked his predecessor for taking the time to leave him a message, but above all he recognized the good intention of his words. “It was a very nice letter. It was a bit of an inspiring letter. Enjoy it, do a good job. Important, very important. How important the work is. It was a positive thing for him to write it. I appreciate the letter,” the head of the nation said before several representatives of the media. Joe Biden left the White House with the worst approval rating for his job since he became president. (Credit: Alex Brandon / AP) Trump discovered the letter in a white envelope with the legend addressed to “47” and Its content is extremely significant after Biden became its main political detractor for just over four years, first by repealing some of his policies that he had implemented during his administration, such as the restrictions on women’s reproductive rights and the pressure exerted on immigrants who lacked documents to prove their stay in the United States. Later, in his attempt to be re-elected, the Democratic politician attacked Donald John Trump with everything, pointing out him as a very dangerous character for American democracy. However, Before retiring from the White House, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. tried to turn the page with a text wishing the best to whoever now takes his place in Washington. “Dear President Trump: As I bid farewell to this sacred office, I wish you and your family all the best in the next four years. The American people—and people around the world—look to this house for steadfastness in the inevitable storms of history, and my prayer is that the years ahead will be a time of prosperity, peace, and grace for our nation. May God bless you and guide you as he has blessed and guided our beloved country since our founding,” states the text signed by the 82-year-old Democrat dated January 20. Keep reading: • Vivek Ramaswamy gives up his mission to try to save the government millions of dollars• Trump sets a date for charging 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada• Trump’s insistence on increasing defense spending to 5% worries NATO

Volkswagen faces challenges due to Trump policies: this happens

With the arrival of donald trump to the White House, the international automotive sector faces an uncertain outlook. The protectionist policies of the new American president have raised concerns in conglomerates such as the Volkswagen Groupwhich operates globally and depends on a complex production and distribution network. Read also: Hyundai Venue: the cheapest in the United States from Hyundai Trump’s promise to impose tariffs on goods manufactured outside the United States threatens to reconfigure trade relations between both sides of the Atlantic. You can read: The electric boom continues to grow in the US. Trump’s focus is on encouraging domestic manufacturing as a measure to strengthen the US economy. However, this position generates tensions with companies that have plants in countries such as Mexico, Europe and China. “The Volkswagen Group is concerned about the damaging economic impact that the tariffs proposed by the US administration will have on American consumers and the international auto industry. “We value collaboration and open dialogue,” stated a company spokesperson in an interview published by Automotive News Europe. The threat of tariffs Among Trump’s proposals, the possibility of imposing a 25% tariff on products imported from Mexico stands out. This move would directly affect the Volkswagen Group, which operates one of its main production plants in Puebla, Mexico. From there, the company manufactures around 350,000 vehicles annuallyincluding models such as the Jetta, Tiguan and Taos, which are mainly exported to the United States. Although the tariff has not been made official, Trump has suggested that these measures could go into effect as soon as on February 1, 2025. In addition, the president has also hinted at the possibility of applying tariffs on products from Europe, which could further complicate the situation for Volkswagen and other European manufacturers. A very challenging panorama The Volkswagen Group’s reliance on cross-border operations is a key piece of its business model. The plants in Mexico not only produce vehicles for the United States, but also for global markets. The possibility of these operations being affected by tariffs raises questions about the sustainability of its current strategy. “The Volkswagen Group looks forward to continuing its long-standing and constructive collaboration with the US administration”the spokesperson insisted, underlining the company’s willingness to dialogue with the authorities. Volkswagen Golf eHybrid logo. Credit: Volkswagen.Credit: Courtesy Impact beyond the United States The challenge is not limited to North America. In Europe, the Volkswagen Group faces growing competition from Chinese manufacturers offering vehicles at lower prices. At the same time, the company is struggling to remain competitive in the electric vehicle segment, a market in which Chinese manufacturers are also gaining ground. China, a key market for Volkswagen, also presents difficulties. In recent years, the company has experienced a decline in sales in this country, adding to global pressure. In response, Volkswagen has stepped up its efforts to develop a line of affordable electric vehiclesa crucial measure to stay relevant in a rapidly changing market. Faced with this complicated panorama, the Volkswagen Group is evaluating various strategies to mitigate the impact of Trump’s policies and other global challenges. Options include the possibility of increasing production in the United States, diversifying its supply chains and accelerating the electrification of its fleet. However, each of these solutions presents significant challenges in terms of investment and time. Trump’s protectionist speech could also influence the decisions of other countries. While Europe has traditionally been a supporter of free trade, the possibility of trade retaliation could exacerbate international tensions. For Volkswagen, this means operating in an increasingly complex and fragmented environment. The Volkswagen Group finds itself at a crossroads. Donald Trump’s protectionist policies represent a significant challenge for the automotive giant, which will need to adapt quickly to avoid a negative impact on its business. Although the road ahead is filled with uncertainty, the company is confident that open dialogue and collaboration with the US administration will be key to getting through this period of “challenging times.”

Sheinbaum affirms that his government has already begun a “very cordial” dialogue with Trump through Marco Rubio

The president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardorevealed that his government He has already started a “very cordial” conversation with the Donald Trump administration through the new Secretary of State of the United States, Marco Rubio.who held a phone call with the Mexican Foreign Minister, Juan Ramón de la Fuente, to talk about migration and security issues. “I want to inform you that yesterday the Foreign Minister, Juan Ramón de la Fuente, spoke by phone with the Secretary of State, Rubio; conversations have already started, It was a very good conversation, very cordial“, he revealed in his morning conference. “There was talk of migration issues, security issues, and as of yesterday these conversations began, which is very important for everyone to know,” he continued. The telephone conversation announced by Sheinbaum took place after the president of the United States, Donald Trump, signed executive orders that would impact Mexico such as the declaration of emergency on the southern border, the designation of Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations and the reactivation of the program ‘Stay in Mexico’. “This is important information for everyone to know, given this idea that there is no communication, it was formally established yesterday. It is the first call from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the first one he made was to Mexico, and it was a very cordial call, Yesterday the chancellor informed me and from there a process of talks between both governments has begun,” he said. Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico.Credit: Isaac Esquivel | EFE After rejecting reports from Mexican media that indicate that the number of deportees to Mexico increased after Trump’s arrival, the head of the Mexican executive assured that there were fewer receptions of compatriots than in previous days. “Yesterday there were no (deportees), there was even less reception of Mexicans that in previous days, so as I said yesterday that we put everything in its place, we are going to support our brothers and sisters who return. ‘Mexico embraces you’ is the program and here in Mexico you will always be received with open arms and Mexico is also experiencing a stellar moment,” he explained. “Also inform you that the care centers on the border are already being installed. Yesterday Secretary Marat was there and today I have asked the Secretary of Welfare to go supervise some of these centers and other secretaries who will also be supervising,” he said. Sheinbaum Pardo maintained that Mexico’s position with the new Trump administration will be to address the causes of the migration phenomenon and make investments in Central America. “Our position is that the most humane and effective way to address the migration phenomenon is cooperation for development, investment in places where there are people who emigrate out of necessity. That will also continue to be our position with the United States, with the Trump administration, with President Trump, that it is essential that there be investments in Central Americain our country, of course in the importance of the Treaty, which I am sure he also values, so that is our approach,” she stated. Keep reading:• Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo makes history by taking the oath as the first President of Mexico• Claudia Sheinbaum recognizes the work of migrants and assures that it is time for women• Sheinbaum will assume the presidency of Mexico with 63% favorable opinion among Mexicans

Trump orders the accelerated deportation of undocumented immigrants

WASHINGTON, DC- A executive order can include various government policies, such as the one recently signed by President Donald Trump, “Protecting Americans from Invasion”where it orders the immediate deportation of undocumented immigrants to apply. “The Secretary of Homeland Security will promptly take appropriate measures to utilize all other provisions of the immigration laws or any other federal law (…), to ensure the efficient and expedited removal of aliens from the United States“, indicates the order signed this Tuesday. The Trump Administration orders the application of this strategy “against all inadmissible and deportable foreigners.” It places particular emphasis on “those foreigners who threaten the security of the American people.” The guideline is set out in Section 9, where it states that even New arrivals may be subject to deportationa policy that has also been applied by Democratic governments, but the period of authorized stay may vary in each government. “(The) efficient deportations of newcomers and other foreigners are authorized,” indicates the order that cites the Immigration and Nationality Law (INA). Each administration is free to set its deportation priorities, as the Supreme Court confirmed in June 2023, when Republicans pushed for the administration to Joe Biden deport any immigrant, rather than allowing immigrants ICE agents evaluate all the conditions of an undocumented person to determine if he or she was a danger to public safety or national security. The expedited deportation process worries immigrant advocates because due process can be violated by preventing a person from presenting their case before an immigration judge. The INA (at 8 USC 1225) when discussing inspection by immigration officials; expedited expulsion of foreigners who arrive inadmissible and referral for hearing indicates that even in expedited deportation, the processes must be before a judge, even if they are expedited. During the first Trump administration, summary trials were held in temporary facilities in Texas, so that expedited deportations were approved by a judge, although the immigrants did not have a legal representative. Operational anywhere Added to the accelerated deportations was the decision of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) so that ICE agents can execute deportation orders in churches, schools, shelters, courts and other places that were considered “sensitive areas”. ICE affirms that the orders against criminals will be executed, but in churches, for example, it is documented that women with children request refuge to avoid deportation, because they have an order from a judge. Keep reading:· With Democratic support, Laken Riley Law against immigrants advances· Tom Homan on mass deportation: “ICE agents from all over the country will be on the streets from the beginning”· Ted Cruz focuses deportations on criminals when speaking at Hispanic gala: “Take your bags and go”

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.