It turns out that the myth that marriage fattens is true. But only for men

There is a preconceived and quite widespread idea that relates marriage to accumulating kilos. Well now a group of researchers has contrasted that this prejudice with respect to the marriage union is correct. Or at least correct. An unequal effect. A new study has observed that the risk of obesity increases significantly in men after marriage. It triples, in fact. The same study, however, did not find a significant change in this probability in the case of women. Of course, the risk of developing overweight did increase in both groups. The results must still be interpreted with some caution because the details of the study have not yet passed the scrutiny of peer review and publication in a scientific journal. Those responsible for the work will be presented by this spring in the 32nd European Congress on Obesity that will be held in Malaga in May. Why do we get fat? The question of why we get fat can have many answers. The simplest is that our body absorbs more calories than it burns, so stores energy in the form of fat. However, this is only part of the story: there are many genetic, environmental or socioeconomic factors that we know are, the less, correlated with our risk of developing overweight or obesity throughout our lives. Little by little we verify that marriage is one of them. 3.2 times higher risk. The study indicated that marriage multiplied by 3.2 the risk of men to develop obesity, while the effect of this union was not significant in the case of women. The risk analysis to develop overweight showed a less marked difference. The team responsible for the study observed A 62% increase in the risk of overweight in the case of men. A risk that in the case of women stayed at 39%. Multiple factors. The study analyzed other factors linked to this relationship, which showed other connections of interest. It was thus observed that some factors affected the risk of obesity in the case of women. For example, depression caused the risk to be folded, while lack of health in terms of health also increased risk in women by 43%. This type of factors and interconnections helps us understand what is happening behind the data. Even so, the hypotheses are diverse (and complementary). For example, Less physical activity by men And social pressure in the case of women can help us understand the unequal phenomenon. “Research also suggests that men may have greater propensity to gain weight after marriage due to factors such as an increase in portions, social meals, and a decrease in physical activity; while women may remain more aware of weight due to social pressures ” He pointed to the British newspaper The Guardian Katharine Jenner, director of Obesity Health Alliance. Also age of age. Another important factor to take into account was that of age, as it could foresee. The study showed that age affected the probability of developing overweight and obesity, and that in this case the effect was greater in women than in men. Thus, for example, the risk of obesity increased by 3% per year in the case of men and 4% per year in the case of women. Understanding the context. Understanding the effect of factors such as marriage can help us develop more effective policies to address obesity and overweight, with the ultimate goal of addressing public health problems such as the increase in some non -transmissible diseases for which obesity and overweight are risk factors. In Xataka | We have a way to improve the effectiveness of treatments such as Ozempic to lose weight: deceive metabolism Image | Jeremy Wong

There are too many AI models. That raises a true death sentence for Anthropic and Claude

We have AI models to bore. And the problem is that everyone starts looking too close and deciding which one is better not simple. All companies and startups strive to be referents in an absolutely unleashed market. One that as in other technological wars probably ends some winners and enough losers. And there are those who compete with clear disadvantages. Another colossal investment round. In The Wall Street Journal indicate That Anthropic is about to close a new financing round that would allow him to lift 3.5 billion dollars. That would make the company’s assessment amount to 61.5 billion dollars, and the question is whether the company really has options in such a competitive market. “This is not a real company”. According to analyst Ed Zitron, Claude has Two million active monthly users in January 2025. It also talks about how according to the WSJ projected revenues for 2025 (based on current contracts) is 1.2 billion dollars, a very modest figure. “They also lost 5.6 billion dollars last year,” Sign it. According to his opinion, Anthropic “is not a real company, they could not survive without the beneficence of risk capital.” Fierce competition. The truth is that Anthropic is facing exceptional competition in which the large heavyweights of the Tech industry are both in the US and in China. Deepseek surprised all of them with the launch of Deepseek V3 and after Deepseek R1, and that seems to have encouraged investors to bet even more money through all these companies. OpenAI is still a reference. At least, it is in number of users. According to CNBC They already have 400 million of active users every week, an exceptional figure that clearly puts them at the head of the popularity ranking in this segment. As with Claude, Openai is burning money that he does not have and that they obtain from extraordinary financing rounds, but unlike this, we insist, the popularity of Chatgpt is evident. And the big ones have what matters now: money. For many users IA is chatgpt, and giants such as Google with Gemini, Microsoft with Copilot or Meta with flame are still far from achieving that acceptance. They have something that Anthropic (or perplexity) does not have: many, many funds – Grok 3, from Xai is another example – and can be maintained in this race even if that is costing them a lot of money. The prize is too fat not to chase him. There are too many models, some can stay on the road. In all technological wars there have been winners and losers. It is the same as what this battle for AI points, in which there are too many competitors and that it probably ends up causing some of these efforts to not survive. Here Anthropic is one of those at a disadvantage. The AI ​​winner can be a company still unknown. Openai, Google, Apple or Microsoft may be especially well positioned to win that race, but it does not have to be so. As they recently indicated In axiosnew company can arise, still unknown, that end up doing something differential and what none of the greats had thought. It is not easy, but of course it is not impossible. Remembering Netscape. In the second half of the 9th Internet began to show their potential, but the great A small company called Netscape He managed to become a reference in the world of browsers. Then it would end up being the great loser of that war, but it was the demonstration that having more money and resources does not always have to have all the options. And that’s why so much investment in startups. That possibility that the one that wins the race will be an unknown company is precisely the one that makes risk capital companies investing a lot of money in projects that may not get absolutely at all. It has recently occurred with Thinking Machines Labthe Startup of Mira Murati, or with Safe Superintelligencethat of Ilya Sutskever. None of them have a product to show, but still have already received spectacular investments. And be careful, there is also China. Of course there are formidable rivals that are not in the US. Mistral is a reference in Europe, while In China another particular war is being fought which has made today the models of the AI ​​of Chinese companies are so good (or sometimes, better) than those of the US. The winner of this battle could also come from that country. Or any other, of course. Image | Saradash Pradhan In Xataka | China has an ambitious plan to overcome the West in Technology. And he has already chosen his 18 companies to get it

Spotify prepares a new subscription option, according to Bloomberg. Music Pro will come true the ancient Hifi audio promise

It seems that this time is serious. Spotify could be closer to comply His former promise to offer higher quality audio to its users. Bloomberg points out that the Swedish firm is preparing a subscription option called Music Pro that will include this and other improvements for those who seek an experience a step beyond Premium. The sources consulted by the aforementioned medium say that Spotify is still working on the price and in the schedule, but they hope to launch the new level at the end of this year for additional $ 5.99 in the United States. At this time it is not clear if the supposed novelties will expand to other markets, including the European Union. Good news for audiophiles In the best case, paying a subscription and listening through the application, Spotify offers sound in AAC format with a quality equivalent to 320 kbps. Taking into account that the loss -less audio bits rate begins around 1,411 kbps, this shows how compressed are Spotify files. And while the service created by Daniel EK has the largest number of planet users, several less popular alternatives offer higher quality audio. There are Apple Music, Amazon Music HD or Tidal, who have been betting on this ideal possibility for audiophiles for a long time. Spotify will seek to make a difference with its new proposal. In addition to offering better quality audio, streaming service will allow subscribers to mix songs by different artists. For this characteristic it will use artificial intelligence, but it will not be the only thing. The additional payment of $ 5.99 The door will open to buy tickets for pre -sale concerts or access better seats. In any case, there is no official confirmation, so we will have to wait to know if this will end up materializing. Even having an official confirmation the ideal would be to wait. In its 2021 Stream On event, Spotify announced with bombs and dishes that would offer “Music with CDs without losses” at the end of that year. Four years have passed since that announcement, and not only the promise is still not fulfilled, but the video in which Billie Eilish participated, which was originally on YouTube, It has disappeared (Now it is private). In addition, la page with more details also It has been eliminated. Over time we will know what will really happen. Images | @felipepelaquim | Sound Tools In Xataka | Huawei Freebuds Pro 4, Analysis: The best way to summarize these headphones is with a word and that is “Chapó”

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.