vertical tabs and split screen

It seemed that AI had arrived in our browsers. In fact, it seemed that the new batch of browsers with AI could change everything, but the truth is that at the moment they have not changed anything. Nor Comet, nor Atlas, nor Day They have managed to conquer us for that aspect. The integration of Gemini in Chrome or Copilot in Edge does not seem to convince us much either. They are striking options, but they remain in the background. The curious thing is that the evolution of browsers has not caught the AI ​​fever, but is gaining momentum with practical, pragmatic and almost everyday options: small details that improve usability and really add up. Vertical eyelashes to power The first of these options is an old acquaintance: the ability to organize our browser via vertical tabs instead of horizontal, it has been gaining ground among more and more users, but the curious thing is that this feature is, indeed, old. Google has just integrated the option to enjoy vertical tabs in Chrome. In fact, Opera I already had a choice of this type almost 20 years ago (if not before) with its “visual tabs”, but ended up abandoning them and in fact today it does not have that option officially although it is possible to add it through extensions. Firefox also adopted that path: it did not have them as standard, but there were those who I was experimenting with that concept. already in 2009 through extensions for this browser. Those who ended up copying and using that option were others: Microsoft Edge did it in 2021Brave in 2023for example, and Vivaldi has them too for a long time. Two of the latest to join this trend are Firefox and Chrome, which has just released this feature. but before, who had made them fashionable again? It was probably Arca browser with many striking ideas that fortunately is now inheriting his successor, Dia, who had erratic beginnings. The success of vertical tabs probably has a lot to do with the way widescreen displays (16:9, 21:9) have ended up conquering our tables. Too much horizontal space and no vertical spacewhich makes vertical tabs make more ergonomic sense than ever. In fact, what is normal in traditional browsers with tabs organized horizontally is that as we open more and more tabs, identifying them (not even with favicons) and selecting them gradually becomes more and more difficult. Vertical organization solves this in a remarkable way, and the fact that Chrome has finally adopted this option is the definitive confirmation that it is valuable to many people… and will probably end up being valuable to many more. Two better than one The second great novelty that is taking hold in the browser market is integrate split screen. Many users—me first—use two browser windows facing each other, one on each side of the screen, but now browsers offer exactly the same thing directly. He maxthon browser was probably one of the first to offer this option: it already had it integrated even before the launch of Windows 10 in 2015. Then we have seen how others have followed in its wake: it did Vivaldihe did Microsoft Edgeand later Opera also added that option. Google has also ended up catching this fever, and added the feature split screen in February 2026. The developers of the most used browser in the world recognized that this type of function “helps people multitask and get more done on the web.” It’s curious because, as we mentioned, this feature was already within our reach thanks to that feature of “Snap” and placing browser windows on both sides of the screen. However, this type of function, although popular, usually requires some familiarity with keyboard shortcuts, although operating systems have been enhancing this ability with more accessible ways to choose the distribution of advantages on the desktop. This function integrated into browsers It is especially useful on laptops or for users of smaller monitors: there, fitting multiple windows in a small space is more inconvenient, and the split screen of browsers can help. But the beauty is not only in dividing the screen: it is that you can open a link directly in the other panel without creating a new tab. The combination of this function with vertical tabs makes the browser gain integers and we can do more in the same space. And the funny thing is that these practical and simple improvements end up being more popular and used than AI functions. The latter may effectively end up “supervitamining” our browsers, but today it’s the little things that win. and it is fantastic that they do it. In Xataka | Perplexity is perfecting an art: bluffing

He has already announced that he will split the payments

Several Supreme Court rulings forced the Treasury to modify a law to prevent the thousands of pensioners who made contributions to the old labor mutual societies between 1968 and 1978 from being subjected to double taxation, paying more in your personal income tax. With the new Law 5/2025 approved, those affected can claim the refund of the personal income tax associated with the fiscal years from 2019 to 2022as well as non-prescribed exercises. The estimated number of affected pensioners exceeds 600,000 and with amounts of up to 4,000 euros in some cases, which is causing delays on the part of the Treasury in their refund and the splitting of the payment. Why is the Treasury returning personal income tax to mutual members? The return to the mutualists is not a voluntary gesture by the Government, but is due to Supreme Court rulings in which it is recognized that pensioners contributed to the Labor Mutual Insurance Funds more than they should have, and the right to enjoy a tax reduction of 25%, for their contributions between 1967 and December 31, 1978. The Supreme Court sentenced that contributions to mutual societies (such as MUFACE, MUGEJU or ISFAS, usually linked to police, military, judicial or banking bodies) were intended for benefits that were subsequently fully taxed, which generated double taxation for those taxpayers. That is, they paid more taxes than a worker who had contributed to INSS in the General Regime, for example, given that a deduction could be applied to them for their contributions. The new Law 5/2025of July 24, prepared to accommodate the rulings of the Supreme Court, included a provision for better channel complaints and accelerate the recognition of the return for the affected years. Treasury sets deadline to return personal income tax Last September, the Treasury began to settle the imbalance with thousands of affected pensioners, and to do so, it enabled a form on their website. Through it, those affected could claim their refund. These are: Pensioners from Social Security and the Social Institute of the Navy who contributed to labor mutual societies between 1967 and 1978 and suffered double taxation. Holders of complementary pensions paid by special funds of the INSS, MUFACE, MUGEJU or ISFAS, when the contributions are prior to 1979. Heirs of those affected mutual members, if the beneficiary died between 2019 and 2024 The Tax Agency has a deadline on December 31, 2025 to complete the refunds, since it must be done six months after the end of the general declaration period that ended on June 30. If the Treasury does not comply with that deadline, those affected may claim late payment interest of 4.0625%, as as they remember from the consumer organization OCU. However, according to what was published by The Newspaperthe Treasury would have confirmed that in some cases, this payment will not be made in a single payment, but in a fragmented manner. This fragmentation is due to the complexity of the process since, in some cases, the lack of documentation or calculation discrepancies have generated different special circumstances that require individualized reviews, so in these cases payments will be settled as they are resolved. Those affected who have not yet claimed their refunds can do so from the corresponding Tax Agency form until February 2, 2026, for the fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022; until February 2, 2027, for the fiscal years 2020, 2021; and until February 2, 2028 to claim the amounts for the 2022 financial year. In Xataka | The Treasury has increased the collection of the Wealth Tax: it is not that there are more millionaires in Spain, it is that they now pay it Image | Unsplash (Musemind UX Agency)

Renfe has its AVRIL trains ready to put them back on the tracks. You just have to show that they don’t split

It seems that the soap opera of Renfe’s AVRIL trains is beginning to see the light at the end of the tunnel. The company has already received the completely repaired trains from Talgo, according to The Economistwho claim that the company has confirmed this point to them. The first question is what will be the new destination of these trains. The second is whether they will pass the litmus test: proving that they do not split. Back. Renfe already has the S106 trains affected by the cracks suffered in the Madrid-Barcelona corridor while providing AVLO service. That is what the company itself has confirmed to us, which, when asked by Xataka has confirmed that the replacement of the bogies has now “been successfully completed”. The trains have returned three months after being sent for repairs to the railway company’s facilities. They have done so after having completely replaced the affected bogies. Instead of being repaired, they have been completely changed to avoid greater evils. What happened? At the end of July, Renfe began to receive signals that something was wrong with its AVRIL trains that provided the AVLO service (Renfe’s low cost line) on the Madrid-Barcelona route. Those signs were, directly, cracks in trains. Although first there was talk of one train, we finally know that there were five that ended up affected by cracks of different magnitudes. After a tug of war between The Economist (which advanced the news) and the company itselfRenfe ended up suspending the sale of AVLO tickets on the Madrid-Barcelona route and ended up redistributing the AVE service to customers. Now the company recovers those affected trains but it does not seem that Madrid-Barcelona will be their destination. Whose fault is it? It is one of the great unknowns. Renfe has pointed out Talgo as the culprit of the cracks, reminding him that the trains are under warranty and that, therefore, they were not going to pay for the repairs. Talgo, for its part, blames Adifensuring that the maintenance of the line is insufficient and that this has caused excessive vibrations that have led to the famous cracks. Everything indicates that the problem is in the section between Madrid and Calatayud. In fact, the company even considered that it would continue operating with its AVLO service in the corridor but at a reduced speed which, it is assumed, did not generate the vibrations and therefore should not have an impact on structural damage to the train. Ultimately, this option was discarded. Fire test. The return of the affected AVRIL trains is a litmus test for Renfe… but above all for Talgo. And it is that Renfe has already been looking for trains in Germany to look for an alternative to the S106, known as AVRIL, which only Talgo manufactures. Giving a good image with a unique train in the world is essential to a company that is in financial trouble. The S106 trains were to be a leap forward for the company. They are the only ones who, given the railway peculiarities of Spainthey can “jump” from Iberian gauge to international gauge. For Renfe they are key because this allows them to position themselves ahead of Ouigo and Iryo facing a future opening to competition in the Galician corridor. However, the S106 have arrived late and They have garnered numerous bad reviews. And where are they going? It is another of the doubts that remain to be cleared up. According to Alberto Puivecinoresponsible for infrastructure and mobility at CCOO in Catalonia, it is possible that these trains will be used for AVANT (medium distance high speed) services in the region. A line that joins Lleida, Tarragona, Barcelona, ​​Girona and Figueres. The information was made public after a meeting between CCOO and the Generalitat of Catalonia. In Xataka We have asked Renfe in this regard but they assure that “the service that the currently immobilized units 106 will provide has not yet been determined. In any case, wherever they are finally going to operate they will do so with full safety guarantees.” For now, the fate of these units remains to be revealed. What we do know is that it is a litmus test for Talgo that must demonstrate that its S106 trains are once again reliable and, above all, are safe enough. Photo | Miguel In Xataka | The countries with the most kilometers of high-speed train, displayed in a graph with a brutal dominator: China

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.