Ukraine refused to fix a bombed Russian oil pipeline. The EU has given you 90 billion reasons to do so

Choking off Vladimir Putin’s war machine seemed like a seamless plan for Europe, but geopolitics has a bad habit of ruining the best strategies. The outbreak of the Third Gulf War has shaken the foundations of the global energy market. Now, with prices skyrocketing and a European Union desperately searching for oil, all eyes have once again fallen on an old Soviet relic: the Druzhba pipeline (which, ironically, means “friendship” in Russian). This gigantic steel tube has today become the trench of a new cold war that threatens to fracture the EU itself. Ukraine, a victim of constant bombings, refused out of principle and security to repair a section of this pipeline that continues to supply crude oil to the European countries closest to Moscow. However, as he advances Financial Timesunprecedented pressure from Brussels and the blocking of a vital loan have forced kyiv to make a 180-degree turn and give in to its European partners. What has happened? To understand the problem, we must go back to the end of January 2026. According to the Ukrainian media Suspilne Mediaa Russian airstrike severely damaged the Brody pumping station in the western Lviv region. The flow of Russian oil transiting through Ukrainian territory towards Hungary and Slovakia was cut short. The diplomatic consequences were immediate. Hungary, which has an exemption to continue buying Russian crude due to its energy dependence, accused Ukraine of delaying reparations for political reasons. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán issued a lethal ultimatum, picked up by the chain NPR: “If there is no oil, there is no money.” A threat that was fulfilled. The Hungarian president vetoed a package of macro-financial and military aid from the European Union to Ukraine valued at 90 billion euros, in addition to blocking the twentieth package of sanctions against Russia. Faced with the risk that Ukraine would run out of funds to sustain its economy and its defense, the European Commission decided to intervene. According to PoliticalCommission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa sent a letter to Zelensky offering “technical support and financing” with European funds to repair the pipeline. Cornered by financial asphyxiation, the Ukrainian president ended up giving in and accepted the offer. “I call this blackmail”. For the kyiv government, this transfer has been an extremely bitter pill. In statements to the press collected by EuronewsVolodymyr Zelensky has not hidden his frustration, stating that forcing them to reopen the tap of Russian oil is, for practical purposes, the same as lifting sanctions on Moscow. “I openly say that I am against it. But if you give me the condition that Ukraine will not receive weapons, then, excuse me, I am powerless in this matter. I told our friends in Europe that this is called blackmail,” said the president, reproaching his country for being forced to “finance anti-European policies.” But the Hungarian blockade does not respond only to energy needs; It has a strong domestic component. As pointed out Al JazeeraHungary faces very close parliamentary elections on April 12. Orbán is nine points behind his main rival, Péter Magyar, is using the supply crisis and the figure of Zelensky as an electoral scarecrow. In fact, the Finnish Prime Minister, Petteri Orpo, did not hesitate to denounce upon his arrival in Brussels that Orbán is “using Ukraine as a weapon in his electoral campaign.” Maximum tension between kyiv and Budapest. On the ground, the situation is confusing. On the Ukrainian side, Zelensky has calculated The repairs will take about a month and a half, but at the moment there are no clear indications of what that might be like. While the agency Suspilne Media reports that a small delegation of EU engineers is already in Ukraine assessing the damage (excluding Hungarian and Slovak experts), Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi, declared to The kyiv Independent have no record of any official European mission in the country. On the Hungarian side, the escalation has gone beyond the merely rhetorical to enter the realm of physical retaliation. According to Deutsche WelleIn early March, Hungarian special forces intercepted two armored vans from the Ukrainian entity Oschadbank that were transiting from Austria. In the operation, Hungary seized $80 million in cash and 9 kilos of gold on suspicion of “money laundering.” Various legal experts consulted by the German media greatly doubt the legality of this seizure, suspecting that it is a direct retaliation for the closure of the pipeline. Zelensky, for his part, has not hesitated to describe this act as plain and simple “banditry.” Drones as the “new oil.” While forced to compromise on Russian energy, Ukraine is seeking to capitalize on its own warfare technology to gain international relevance—and funds. As detailed in an analysis of the BBCZelensky has offered the United States and the Gulf countries a $50 billion joint production deal based on Ukraine’s experience making cheap interceptor drones. “For us, this is like oil,” said the Ukrainian president, trying to position his country as a vital provider of security in the midst of the Middle East conflict. In parallel, the energy war is not limited to the Druzhba pipeline. As revealed The Moscow Timesthe Russian state company Gazprom recently denounced that Ukraine launched a wave of 26 drones against compression stations in the Krasnodar region. These infrastructures are key for the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines, which are currently one of the few remaining routes for Russia to export gas to Europe through Turkey, demonstrating that kyiv continues to try to hit the Kremlin’s energy portfolio wherever it can. The final pulse in Brussels. All this tension has led to the summit of European Union leaders that starts today, March 19, 2026, in Brussels. As he emphasizes TVP Worldthe pressure on Viktor Orbán is absolute. Upon arrival at the summit, the head of European diplomacy, Kaja Kallas, went straight to the point: “It’s time to show our support for Ukraine.” In Brussels right now they are crossing their fingers. As pointed out … Read more

Samsung and SK Hynix have flatly refused

The most basic response for a market with a lot of demand and rising prices is none other than increasing production. However, in a memory market experiencing a pricing crisis (largely due to the “perfect storm” caused by AI), the two actors that control a huge percentage of the world’s supply have opted for the opposite strategy. Samsung and SK Hynix have confirmed to their investors that They have no intention of flooding the market to alleviate the shortage. Their priority has changed: they prefer short-term profitability and security against a possible AI bubble, which, as we already said, has caused the industry to stop manufacturing for people to make it for the machines. Slam the door on mass production. The decision of the South Korean memory giants is firm and public. According to what they collect international media and the korean newspaper HankyungSamsung has clarified in investment conferences that its strategy is now focused on minimizing the risk of overproduction rather than rapidly expanding its capacity. This path already has tangible consequences: currently, Samsung only manages to satisfy 70% of the DRAM orders it receives. SK Hynix, on the other hand, has openly admitted that “it will be difficult to resolve the supply shortage” before the first half of 2027. Goodbye to stable controls. The new supply restriction policy is accompanied by a change in the commercial rules of the game. The South Korean media points out that Samsung has begun to reject long-term contracts. This prevents PC or mobile manufacturers from being able to protect themselves against inflation, passing the extra cost on to the end user. It is the materialization of what Xiaomi managers They already warned weeks ago: your next cell phone is going to be more expensive. Sacrifice the consumer for a good reason. The technical reason behind the shortage is a transfer of resources. Production lines are turning to the manufacture of HBM memories — even Intel as response to your current situation— essential for AI GPUs. The most drastic example is Micron, the third player, which has announced the closure of its “Crucial” consumer division to focus on the data and AI sector. By reserving production for strategic clients, the consumer market becomes more undersupplied. Fear of the bubble. Behind this refusal to maximize production to satisfy everyone lies a trauma. Manufacturers fear that the AI ​​fever is a bubble and will collapse after massive expansion. Because? They would be left with oversized factories and million-dollar losses. They prefer to maintain the current shortage – which has triggered memory by up to 300% in some cases – rather than risk future excess stock. The projections are not optimistic. Analysts conclude that the crisis will extend beyond 2028. It is estimated that memory demand will grow by 35% in 2026, while supply will only grow by 23%. With Micron withdrawing from the consumer market and Korean giants slowing production, shortages will cease to be a situation and become the market norm in the coming years. Cover image | Composition with images of PxHere and CEFICEFI for Wikimedia Commons In Xataka | Samsung is dealing with one of the most challenging stages in its history. To succeed, it needs to be successful in chip manufacturing

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.