Microsoft believed that the purchase of Activision was a round business. A year later I lost 300 million for ‘Call of Duty’

The clients of Game Pass They are still trying to recover from the impressive 50% rise of the Ultimate mode rate in the service. A spectacular climb that moves Microsoft’s proposal away from that buffet Economic games of all kinds That once it was, and that he has his clients since then circling a single question: why? And although Microsoft has not yet made anything clear, there are some issues that already have an answer. 300 million. Game Pass had rare He arrived at the service on day onesomething only possible thanks to the purchase of activation by Microsoft. However, it was still extraordinary: ‘Call of Duty’ was, thanks to that acquisition, The most valuable property that Xbox had in its portfolio. And now it was available for all Game Pass users without additional cost. According to Bloombergthe experiment cost Microsoft 300 million dollars. Internal affairs. This movement is the last and most striking of this type that Xbox has given, determined to drown its rivals with strategies that meant a high cost in sales. Bloomberg states That, as seven anonymous informants have told the environment, getting as powerful as powerful as’Forza Horizon 5‘ either ‘Halo infinite‘Internal fractures already supposed due to the important sales that were lost by placing these games available to all Game Pass subscribers. According to The Vergethe discussion about ‘Black Ops 6’ was even greater, and it was not for less. In An interview with Windows CentralBobby Kotick, an Activision Ex-Cecement, already claimed that due to having spent his career in Los Angeles, he had seen with disgust how “large media companies had transferred their contents to these subscription streaming services, which had negatively affected business results.” The story was repeated. It was clear. Ign counted at the time That the movement triggered the subscriptions to Game Pass, as expected, and the ‘Cod’ itself went up: 23% more than the previous delivery, ‘Modern Warfare 3’. But there is an important nuance: 82% of those sales were in PlayStation, in opposition to Xbox and PC. Yes, subscriptions had risen, as expected, but not enough: just 16%. According to The calculations that Kotaku doesto compensate for the 300 million copies of the game that Activision (and therefore, Microsoft) did not sell, it would have needed an impossible: 15 million new monthly subscribers to Game Pass (or 1.25 per year). Drink for pain. Again, according to Kotaku calculations, the remarkable price increase in the Ultimate rate relieves these numbers for Microsoft: it would need 10 million new subscribers to compensate for those losses. Something that, without a doubt, is far from the possibilities of the service, but we get an idea of ​​to what extent the climb was an urgent need for Microsoft. Bloomberg states that Microsoft Amy Hood’s CFO has asked the division of games to find more ways to raise benefits, so new increases are not ruled out at all, inclusion of advertising or limitations in the characteristics of the Tiers cheaper to encourage subscribers to pass to Ultimate. A purchase at all. Everything summarizes well in the statements of the specialized analyst Joost Van Dreunen: “Game Pass has not provided the explosive growth that Microsoft anticipated in the post-Compra of Activision era, and they have realized that their structural costs do not align with their pricing model.” That is, Microsoft foresaw a notable impulse of subscriptions thanks to blows to the table such as the arrival of ‘Black Ops 6’, and it has not been so. Crisis policy is approaching in Microsoft (which, by the way, states that He does not leave his plans to continue in the hardware business) and, without a doubt, it will have an impact on our pocket. In Xataka | The portable Xbox is finally a reality. The only unimportant detail is that it is not exactly an xbox

The iPhone 15 is still a good purchase option currently and more with this offer that Mediamarkt has

If you have been thinking for a while to renew your old iPhone or want to make the leap to iOS, you don’t have to spend a pasture in the last model launched into the market. Now, in Mediamarkt you can take the iPhone 15a good phone, with excellent value for money, by 709 euros. In Amazon You can also buy it at the same price. * Some price may have changed from the last review The iPhone 15 is still a good high -end phone Although the iPhone 15 It was released in September 2023, still It is still a good Apple terminal To buy today without having to spend the almost 1,000 euros that the last model launched into the market usually cost. Your screen is type Super Retina XDR OLED of 6.1 inches. It offers a resolution of 2,556 x 1,179 pixels, it reaches a maximum brightness of 2,100 Nits and has a 60 Hz soda rate. It comes with True Tone technology and with a feature that (until its launch) only enjoyed the iPhone 14 Pro: the Dynamic Island. As for the brain of this terminal is the Apple A16 Bionic Chipaccompanied by a 6 GB RAM and an internal storage capacity of 128 GB. Factory works with the operating system iOS 17although it can be updated to the latest version. Your photographic system is composed of a Double rear camera of 48+12 mp. Finally, it can be highlighted that another of the things that this terminal stands out is because it is the first device of the apple signing that has incorporated the USB-C port, leaving the lightning connector behind. Some accessories for this iPhone that may interest you Iniu fast wireless charger stand * Some price may have changed from the last review Jetech found for iPhone 15 * Some price may have changed from the last review Some of the links of this article are affiliated and can report a benefit to Xataka. In case of non -availability, offers may vary. Images | Iván Linares (Xataka) and Apple In Xataka | The best mobiles, we have tried them and here are their analysis In Xataka | iPhone 16 vs iPhone 15: What Apple Smartphone Choose according to your needs

Overcoming our brain when making the purchase is not easy. Some researchers have developed a tool to achieve it

“Codazo theory.” It’s how we could translate Anglo -Saxon expression, “Nudge Theory”, Which refers to the study of actions focused on giving us A “little push” Towards a specific decision. The concept is especially used in the context of the behavioral economy, That place where the economy is mixed with psychology. We know that companies often resort to these “pushcins” to lead us to purchases that generate more benefits but can we use this tool to improve health? Digital tool. The answer is yes, and there are many researchers who work to develop this type of tools. The last It has been developed By a team of Duke-Nus Medical School and it is a digital tool that aims to facilitate the task of choosing healthier products in our purchase on-line. An imperfect system. Choosing healthier food products is not always easy. Yes, we can always make sure that our purchase car is full of fruits, vegetables and other basic foods to cook at home, but this option is not always realistic. Labeling systems such as Nutriscore They can help us choose better, but they have Important limitations. The first is that evaluating the healthy of a product in a simple index is not always easy and sometimes leads us to important inconsistencies. The second, that this index must compete with marketing strategies that seek to buy a product, regardless of how healthy or ceases to be. Beyond labeling. To exceed these limitations, Duke-Nus’s team designed a digital tool destined to facilitate a purchase on-line better informed at nutritional level. This tool complemented the information available on the Internet purchase page, adding additional information. This additional information included a traffic light based on the index Nutriscore of products, complemented with other tools. First, the page ordered the products based on this index, first showing the healthiest products instead of doing it alphabetically. Second, the tool incorporated the follow -up of the products in the purchase car, indicating what proportion of food was labeled as green, yellow or red. Third, the digital tool also showed healthy alternatives (with similar prices and characteristics) to selected products. Studying alternatives. The team tested the tool through an experiment. They asked a group of participants to make three purchases on-line over three to six weeks. Some of the participants used this tool, while others used the conventional portal. The team observed that the purchase cars of the people of the intervention group scored better in the nutritional index. They also contained less calories, less fat in total and less saturated fats, less sugar and less salt. The details of the study were published In an article In the magazine American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Public health issue. By will or necessity, there are many people who seek to eat healthier, and that begins in a healthier purchase. Achieving it for oneself is not easy, but it is not to help these people without falling into prohibitions and Tax Methods. Here is like the behavior economy and Nudge Theory They can help us: the same tool often used to take us to more advantageous options for sellers can also be used to improve the health of consumers who wish to improve their diet. In Xataka | The three expert tricks so that they do not lead you with food labeling, according to one of the country’s biggest specialists Image | Lothar Boris Piltz

What can we expect after the purchase of X by XAI

Last Friday, unexpected news and totally surprise. The startup XAI, from Elon Musk, acquired xalso by Elon Musk. The tycoon announced the operation highlighting how that made Xai an estimated assessment (according to him) of 80,000 million dollars, while that of X was 33,000 million dollars (45,000 million except 12,000 million debt). The question, of course, is what this movement is due and what can we expect from now on. Because. According to Musk, the future of Xai and X is intertwined, and this fusion allows “combining data, models, computing, distribution and talent” of both companies. What it certainly allows is to ensure that X accounts are integrated in XAI’s, with much more economic projection. It is true that X is a company that It seems to recover groundbut it has had a bad time since Musk bought it. A natural fusion. As indicated In The New York Timesboth companies are private and already shared numerous resources, such as their engineers. Grok, XAI’s chatbot, is trained with data published by X and that are public in this social network. Andrew Verstein, a professor at the UCLA Law School commented on and daily how what seems to say Musk with this movement is “I have a company that may not be bankrupt, but it is not the jewel of my crown. I will buy it so that it seems a success using one of my other companies.” Actions that change hands. According to The Wall Street JournalX and XAI shares will be replaced by new shares of a holding called XAI Holdings Corp. There is another potential advantage derived from this fusion, according to analysts: it will be easier to lift new investment rounds for that combined entity. It already happened before. In 2016 he used actions from his electric car company, Tesla, to buy Solarcity, a company dedicated to renewable energy in which Musk was the highest shareholder and in which his cousin Lyndon Rive was the CEO. Many shared resources (and opaque) among their companies. Companies created or managed by Elon Musk have always made use of resources shared. Being in many cases private, several of these movements are opaque, and for example in August 2024 the Employee movement From Tesla to Xai and also from Gpus used in Tesla To use them in X or XAI. All with an objective: accelerate in his plan to convert Xai into a reference in the segment of artificial intelligence. The relationship between Trump and Musk facilitates everything. The months following the inauguration of the new presidential cycle of Donald Trump have been beneficial for Musk. The valuation of X has risen, to a large extent because the platform is now more influential. The tycoon indicated in the announcement of the operation as X has more than 600 million active users. Grok, from Xai showed the way to integrate into x. During a good part of their existence, XAI’s models were limited to X payment subscribers, but for months the Chatbot Grok 3 has been available for all X users, including those who use the free version. XAI takes advantage of the activity in X to train its models, and that makes this integration even more natural now that both companies have merged. What can we expect. The acquisition should not influence the operation of both companies for users, but one thing is clear: if they previously shared resources in a more opaque way, they will now do it comprehensively. The XAI AI models will be nourished by the data published in X more than ever, and in turn x will benefit from the improvements that are implemented in models such as Grok 3 and that are available from the platform. The overcoming always on the horizon. We have been talking about A potential xand that fusion of Xai with X makes this project somewhat closer. It already has covered the creation of content and the social network, but many areas are missing, and one above all: to be able to use X as a payment platform, Something to which he has pointed out On more than one occasion. In Xataka | Murphy’s law conspires against Elon Musk: if something has been able to happen to their companies this week, it has happened

Purchase in quality is more disputed than ever

The 16E iPhone is already here and, as it was rumored, it is a kind of updated iPhone 14. Sounds weird, but it is just like this: the design of the iPhone 14 ahead, similarities with the iPhone 8 behind, and hardware iPhone 16. Of course, a fairly curious combination. The price of this model is 709 euros, a quite less sweet figure compared to the 529 euros of the previous generation. The problem? The Secondamano market, the reconditioned and the websites that move away from the “traditional” offer even more appetizing alternatives. It is easy to buy a much better mobile for very little extra money. The second -hand market. Yes, navigating between Wallapop and other second -hand pages is a Latazo. But if you have some view and patience, in less than 10 minutes you can find alternatives to the iPhone 16E inside your own home. If we filter in Wallapop iPhone 15 With a maximum of 650 euros and “new” status or as new, there is a lot to buy. We find several stores (in case we want to flee from individuals) that sell the phone with invoice, guarantee and battery at 100%. If we deepen the search, there are even prevented them at this price. If you don’t care too much Apple Intelligence or gross power, you have a mobile with a more current design, dynamic island, double camera and a screen with more shine. If it is worth the iPhone 15 with respect to the new one, it will depend on the needs of each user, but of course it is worth stopping to think which is the best purchase. Looking for iPhone 16It is also not difficult to find them for about 750 euros. For just 40/50 euros more, we can get one seal and invoice if we have some eye and patience. The reconditioned. The reconditioned mobile market Keep growing in Spain. These are mobiles that have been used and have been returned or, in the best cases, mobile phones without using a packaging problem or that by logistics have not been able to be sold as new. Currently, Backmarket sells the iPhone 15 in “excellent” state by 663 euros. If we want it with a new battery, go up to 715 euros. Here there is a somewhat more notable difference with the price. So much that, of lost to the river. Let’s go for an iPhone 16. Non -traditional websites. Between the iPhone 16 and the iPhone 16E the decision seems clear. The only reason to bet on it would be a notable price difference. And it is, if we do not leave the traditional renowned stores in Spain. These are life insurance, but there are possibilities beyond. Currently, the iPhone 16 can be purchased for 750 euros On websites such as Shodutyfree, 150 euros apart from the iPhone 16E. Yaphone also has it below 780 eurosand a quick search is enough to find websites that in less than a week send you home. A difference of between 50 and 80 euros to access the iPhone 16, notably higher than the SE. It is true that, although these websites offer guarantee, to have the official Apple service supporting our purchase always sum. The question is whether to buy a lower model for practically the same money. Image | Apple In Xataka | iPhone 16 vs iPhone 15. What Apple Smartphone Choose according to your needs

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.