caffeine

Science now suggests that caffeine could be a “shield” against dementia

by

For years, the debate about whether coffee is a hero or a villain for health has swung like a pendulum between one position and another. However, science has now given a good reason for the most coffee lovers to drink even more coffee. The reason is in a new study published in JAMA which has put evidence on the table that is difficult to ignore: moderate caffeine consumption not only keeps us alert today, but could be protecting our brain for tomorrow. The data. We talk about how this is evidence that is difficult to ignore precisely because it is not a one-time survey from a weekend, but rather a Harvard research team. analyzed more than 130,000 people for four decades. Specifically, the sample that has been handled in this case has been 131,821 participants, which included health personnel, and a follow-up of up to 43 years was carried out during the years 1980 and 2023. At the end of the study, 11,033 cases of incident dementia were documented, which is what had to begin to be studied. With your diet. Once all this information is available, researchers have had to begin to cross-reference the dietary intakewhich have been updated every four years, with medical histories. Here the primary objective was to look for a pattern that related something in the lives of patients with dementia to their illness. And the truth is that they saw a fairly clear pattern: those who consumed caffeinated coffee had a lower risk of developing dementia compared to those who barely ate it. Something that other studies in the past also pointed out. Neither little nor too much. Logically, the study does not suggest that we should start drinking coffee as if it were water, since the effects of caffeine in large quantities are very harmful to health. Science suggests in this case that the greatest benefit was observed in those who consumed approximately 2 to 3 cups of coffee a day. In concrete figures, it was seen that this consumption reduced the risk of having dementia by 18% and also showed in patients a lower prevalence of subjective cognitive impairment and better scores on objective memory tests. Drink more coffee. According to this specific study, the benefit stabilizes, meaning that it does not improve further, but it does not worsen drastically in this group of patients. But other meta-analyses suggest that with consumption of more than 4 or 5 cups, the benefits can be reversed and generate other problems. Caffeine is key. One of the most interesting findings is the chemical distinction that is made, since researchers separate people who drink caffeinated coffee and those who drink decaffeinated coffee. Here the results were quite clear: decaffeinated coffee consumption is not associated with a decreased risk of dementia or better cognitive performance. This suggests that the neuroprotective effect does not come only from the antioxidants or polyphenols of the bean (which are also in decaffeinated), but caffeine is the active agent main in this equation. The effect of tea. There is a large group of people who do not depend on caffeine to stay awake, but on the caffeine in tea. In this case, tea consumption showed coffee-like associationssince drinking 1 to 2 cups a day was also linked to a reduced risk of dementia and better cognitive function. This is something that reinforces the theory that caffeine and other compounds such as L-theanine play a protective role in our nervous system. Why does it work? Although in this case the study is not focused on telling us the reasons, the authors propose a series of biological mechanisms to understand it. The first of them is that caffeine blocks adenosine receptors in the brainwhich not only makes us more awake, but could reduce the accumulation of beta-amyloid, the protein associated with Alzheimer’s when it is in large quantities. In addition to this, caffeine is also believed to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines in the brain, mitigating neuroinflammation that precedes cognitive decline. And if we lacked reasons to defend caffeine, it is added that it improves insulin sensitivity and vascular function, two factors that, when they fail, open the door to dementia. The small print. Although variables such as tobacco, exercise and diet were adjusted for, it cannot be definitively proven that coffee causes brain protection. It may always be the case that people with early cognitive decline give up coffee because it makes them sick, but the researchers tried to control for this by excluding the first few years of follow-up. Furthermore, it must be taken into account that the participants were mostly health professionals with higher education, so the results could vary in populations with other lifestyles or genetics. Enjoy, but don’t force yourself. The person who already enjoys 2-3 cups of coffee a day has one more scientific reason to do so without guilt in this case, since it is in the “sweet spot” of neurological protection. But if there are people who do not like coffee or it makes them very nervous, there is no need to force it, since the quality of sleep and the exercise They remain the undisputed kings of brain health. Images | Fahmi Fakhrudin In Xataka | We believed that the early onset of dementia was due to genetic causes. we were wrong

There are people so against sleeping that they have even made caffeine patches. It’s a bad idea

by

If the 90s were the decade of nicotine patches to save the lungs and the 2000s that of transdermal contraceptives, 2026 has given birth to a different and more revealing obsession: wellness patchmania. If we thought we had seen it all in the universe of digital self-care —tapes to cover the mouth and sleep better, stickers to lose weight effortlessly or nighttime facial bandages that promise wake up with botox effect— the last frontier is here: patches to have energy, concentrate more or sleep better or reduce appetite. Simply peel off a small sticker, adhere it to your skin, and trust it to do its job. The so-called wellness patches or wellness patches are transdermal adhesives that promise to release active substances through the skin for several hours. As brands explain and advertising campaigns, allow you to avoid pills, bypass digestion and offer a slow and constant release of ingredients such as caffeine, berberine, B vitamins, melatonin, magnesium or plant extracts such as ashwagandha. According to The Guardianit is a market that is increasingly saturated with products that promise to treat “the most common symptoms of everyday life”: fatigue, stress, lack of sleep, menstrual discomfort or low mood. Many of these patches are sold in bright colors and designs designed not only to be worn, but to be seen. Well-being stops being something intimate and becomes a visible sign. The phenomenon is not new in medicine: nicotine patches, contraceptives or some hormonal treatments have been used for decades with proven effectiveness. The difference, As several experts point outis that these medical patches work because the molecules they release are suitable for passing through the skin and because they have passed rigorous clinical trials. In the world of wellness, that requirement disappears. An increasingly tired society The appeal of these products lies more in their aesthetics and comfort than in their effectiveness. In other words, there is no need to swallow a pill, prepare a drink or change routines: just stick something to your skin. As pointed out in The Atlanticpatches fit perfectly into a culture obsessed with constant self-optimization and hack vital. Furthermore, by being visible, they turn the user into a brand ambassador: they generate conversation, social validation and the feeling of doing something for their own health. However, the scientific consensus is quite clear. As Michelle Spear explainsProfessor of Anatomy at the University of Bristol, the skin is not designed to absorb substances, but to block them. Its outer layer, the stratum corneum, acts as a wall formed by dead cells and lipids that prevents the passage of most compounds. Only some very specific molecules can pass through it easily: small, fat-soluble and without an electrical charge. Nicotine or estradiol meet these conditions. Many of the substances present in wellness patches such as vitamin B12, minerals such as magnesium or iron, or plant compounds such as berberine are too large or water-soluble to pass through the skin in significant quantities. In other words, if a substance requires high oral doses or even injections to be effective, the probability that a sticker will be able to deliver it in a useful way is very low. Added to this is the lack of independent studies that show that these patches can correct real deficiencies or treat health problems. The problem of “feeling better” Immunologist John Tregoning suggests a key question: How do you measure whether something works when the effect is “feeling better”? Tiredness, stress or concentration are deeply subjective experiences, influenced by multiple variables. Sleeping more, changing routines, eating better or simply believing that something will work can alter perception. Beyond the lack of effectiveness, experts warn of possible side effects. From the British environment have collected cases of dizziness and feeling of weakness after using patches with berberine. Added to this are skin irritations, allergic reactions and a false sense of security that can delay seeking medical attention. When the patch is no longer harmless. Caffeine patches are promoted as a gentler alternative to coffee or energy drinks. However, testimonies collected in different media they mention nervousness, difficulty sleeping or feeling overstimulated. The problem is not just the caffeine, but the inability to control the dose: unlike a drink, the patch continues to release it for hours, even when the body no longer needs it. Berberine poses a different problem. These patches are marketed as appetite suppressants or metabolism accelerators, and have even been compared – without scientific basis – to drugs such as Ozempic. The experts remember that there is no solid evidence berberine can be absorbed effectively through the skin or cause significant weight loss. Furthermore, these products are becoming popular in a context of the return of aesthetic pressure and the obsession with thinness, especially among young women. The risk is not only physiological, but cultural: presenting hunger control as something that can be turned off with a sticker reinforces an instrumental and problematic relationship with the body. The patch as a cultural symptom The underlying question cuts across all sources: why do we look for such simple solutions? As Deborah Cohen points outwe are medicalizing normal life experiences. Sleeping poorly, being tired or losing concentration are not always pathologies; Many times they are logical responses to a demanding, hyperconnected and poorly rested environment. However, we live in a culture that prefers shortcuts to rethinking. It is easier to put on a patch than to review schedules, workloads, expectations or rest habits. These products do not promise to change life, but to make it more bearable without questioning it. They function, in that sense, more as a cultural pain reliever than as a health tool. Most experts agree thatif a patch makes someone feel better and does not cause harm, its occasional use is not necessarily dangerous. The problem arises when they are presented as real solutions to complex problems or when they replace basic habits such as sleeping, resting, eating well or consulting a health professional. Perhaps the success of caffeine and berberine … Read more

The amount of caffeine of the drinks we consume daily, exhibited in this graphic

by

The caffeine It is one of the most consumed substances in the world. HE esteem that about 80% of the world’s population consumes caffeine daily and, although Coffee is an important sourceit is also present in tea, coffee, matte grass, cocoa pods or in Kola’s nut -Coca-Cola noticel-. However, it can also be produced synthetically to add it to soft drinks, energy drinks or supplements. And in this graph prepared by Visual Capitalistwe can see how much caffeine the drinks we constantly consume. The graph. Prepared with data from EFSA (The European Food Security Authority, in Spanish) After surveying To more than 66,500 people from 22 European countries, the graph is quite self -explanatory. In some publications of this type the brand is usually obvious, but the really useful thing about this graph is that, directly, the amount of caffeine in commercial drinks is indicated as Monster, Red Bull either Prime (A brand created by The controversial Logan Paul). It is also useful that both the milligrams of caffeine of drinks and the amount of liquid we consume are offered, since we can calculate more effectively “how many Red Bull I can take to have a safe dose.” A Monster It is what has the most caffeine, but also because the sample is half a liter. Prime, with less quantity (330 ml), is close to the caffeine of a monster with its 140 mg. And it is curious that the drink that gives us wings has on a boat the same amount as a double espresso: 80 mg. Not only caffeine. What happens with energy drinks is that, like EFSA itself detailsthe stimulant they contain is not limited to caffeine. Apart from that compound, they have other ingredients such as bullfighting or D-Gucorone-y-lactona. Bullfighting is an amino acid that participates in the control of cell calcium and cardiac function, associated with the improvement of sports resistance by allowing high efforts for longer, reducing fatigue. The D-Glucurono-Y-Lactona is a metabolite of the glucuronic that helps in the synthesis of vitamin C, and both are safe for their rapid metabolization, although they can have secondary effects such as some digestive discomfort in high consumption. And if caffeine, bullfighting and D-Glucurono-γ-lactone were little, something more harmful must be added to the cocktail: huge amounts of sugar in these energy drinks. Consumption by age. EFSA has created a table that indicates how many mg of caffeine we consume daily depending on our age: age range Daily consumption From 75 years 22-417 mg Between 65 and 75 years 23-362 mg between 18 and 65 years 37-319 mg between 10 and 18 years 0.4-1.4 mg/kg between 3 and 10 years 0.2-2.0 mg/kg between 12 and 36 months 0-2.1 mg/kg Among adults, the coffee It is the most important source of caffeine, representing between 40% and 94% of total daily intake. In Ireland and the United Kingdom, the thing changes, and that main source is tea, representing between 59% and 57% of the intake, respectively. Among teenagers, the main source of caffeine is chocolate (both in bar and cocoa drinks), followed by coffee, tail drinks and tea. And from 10 years down, coffee disappears and chocolate continues to reign, followed by tea and tail drinks. Safe consumption, but with asterisks. One of the issues that continues to worry who seeks to take care is how much caffeine is a lot of caffeine. The 400 mg a day have been taken as the universal measure to say that it is the “safe” amount, but it is something that depends on several factors. For example, unique doses of caffeine of up to 200 mg do not present security problems for the healthy adult population. But if you are a woman and you are pregnant, that safe figure goes down to 200 mg per day, distributed throughout the day. In addition, if unique doses of 100 mg are consumed before going to sleep, the sleep quality pattern can be altered, but it is something that does not happen in all adults. But of course, everything depends on a key term: healthy population, since there are studies that relate caffeine to negative effects on chronic sleep restriction phases and, although it is used as a stimulant in sports, Its effects will be more or less beneficial depending on the sport we practice or the decisions we should make. In Xataka | In 1985 Coca-Cola changed her formula when Pepsi was about to defeat her. It went wrong

Esnifar caffeine has become a tool to perform better. Science is not sure if it is safe

by

One of the chemical compounds that coffee is is caffeine, and for years It has been subject to numerous myths. It is something that contributed to coffee to earn a certain bad reputation, but numerous studies In recent years they have helped us Understand coffee properties and the Effects of caffeine on the body. Moreover: caffeine has gained popularity as a supplement, so much that it is sold separately in the form of gum or strips. And yes, also in the form of caffeine dust to sniff. Coffee as a supplement. Like almost everything, caffeine has both positive and negative effects. Take coffee or food with caffeine in sleep times, It is not the best decisionbut as a sports supplement, caffeine has proven to be an ally. In certain situations, at least. For example: due to your effect In oxidation of fats, consume caffeine stimulates ‘fat burning’. In team sports such as football, An experiment demonstrated that players who took a dose of caffeine before training made more precise long passes. However, this study presented the counterpart Of the caffeine: when the player had to face situations of stress and thought very fast, as usually happens during a game, decision -making was something worse among those who had consumed caffeine. Therefore, it depends on the sport we do and our goal, but in what can be an individual strength and aerobic training, caffeine has certain effects that we can consider beneficial. One more supplement, go. Cocaffeine. However, caffeine is not only consumed to perform better at the sports level. There are students, drivers or people who simply need it at certain times of the day to feel more awake thanks to their stimulating effectand that is where products that do not seek to provide any more than the amount of caffeine enter. We don’t talk about energy drinks (With huge amounts of caffeine per can, yes, but also a lot of sugar), but of bars, gels, gum (used in the Military scope), pills and even caffeine aerosols. The key here is speed. While having tea or coffee causes caffeine to take half an hour to take effect, with liquid caffeine roads, gels or caffeine patches that dissolve in the mouth, the effects are much faster. There are already those who are offering both mouth and nasal aerosols that seek to activate sensors in the brain or a direct route for absorption in the lungs. The problem? There is no scientific evidence, for the moment, that supports these statements, but there is one more method. Energy sniff. In the image we can see the presentation of ‘Widkraut Energy sniff’, a product that clearly alludes to certain substances. That mountain of white dust or the product name itself is a clear wink. “A widkraut boat contains more than 20 doses of energy,” We read on the webwhere it is also detailed that it does not have tobacco, nicotine or sugar; which is driven by nature and has been clinically tested. Your uses? Work concentrated for longer, endure night shifts or long trips by car, gaming, party nights or pay more in studio and sports sessions. Has a lot of ingredients Different apart from caffeine and claim that, thanks to scientific confirmations by “three clinical studies elaborated by the German Institute most recognized in dermatological studies”, it is safe for the nasal mucosa. Because Energy Sniff, like caffeine aerosols, is consumed by the nose, but in this case, the dust is snorted. Careful. The 60 rations cost 48 euros, similar what costs a kilo of good coffee with more health propertiesbut what is sought here is, as we said, that caffeine arrives as quickly as possible to the bloodstream to begin to circulate through the body causing the desired effects. Returning to Energy Sniff, they clarify that it is harmful in case of ingestion and should only sniff, never exceeding the maximum dose of one gram. There are already studies that They point that these alternative ways of consuming caffeine are not entirely supported by evidence and that more information and analysis is needed. For example, bars and gels are under the magnifying glass to see what real effects they have on athletes, but as we say, it continues to investigate. About sniffing caffeine, it must be clarified that, although the brands (there are others, such as’Want a bump?‘ either ‘WP Energy sniff‘that are promoted the same) They clarify that everything is manufactured using legal ingredientsThey have caused some arqueen an eyebrow. And doctors? That lack of prolonged and conscientious scientific support on the effects not only of caffeine itself, but of the way of taking it to our body, since you have to be careful not to overcome the recommended caffeine doses (special attention in pregnant women) and stop taking it by this way if we feel any discomfort. At the moment, the investigation is focusing In gels, gum and bars as a useful strategy to assimilate caffeine in the shortest possible time. On the other hand, there are doctors who have spoken about it. Shaline Rao is the director of Cardiology at Langone Hospital in Long Island and Comment The aforementioned: “The key is to keep the amount safe and take into account the upper limit to avoid overdose, as well as the appropriate time between them.” Other voices are more criticismreferring to the ease of passing with the amount of caffeine, the possible development of tolerance that leads to increase the dose little by little harmful effects in the mucosa. For the American FDA, directlyconcentrated caffeine products are “a serious threat to public health” and in France, directly, His sale was prohibited In 2024. Viewing the boom in this form of consumption, it is now on the roof of science to check the risks and if it is worth against aerosols, gels or gum. In Xataka | The best trick to make coffee in the Italian coffee maker is not to make coffee in the Italian coffee maker

In 1995, NASA began to drug spiders with amphetamines, marijuana and the most devastating: caffeine

by

We carry decades experimenting with animals. Despite the Ethical issueand that we see more and more vegan products that imply that there has been no experimentation in animals, until Large technological ones resort to this method. And in 1995, NASA made one of the more curious experiments To measure the drug toxicity. And they did it drugs. Measuring toxicity. It is not that someone woke up one day and wondered what would happen if we die LSD to spiders. Or well, exactly that is what happened, but for a good reason and not for fun. In 1948, the researcher Peter N. Witt He wanted to help his colleague HM Peters, a zoologist who wanted to modify the schedule in which his laboratory spiders began to weave the nets. To do this, he administered substances such as LSD, Mescalina (hallucinogen), amphetamines, caffeine and strychnine (stimulating such as cocaine) To the arthropods and discovered something: the schedule did not change the least, but the patterns of the cobwebs. Depending on the drug Administered, the pattern changed, and that revelation served as an economic model to prove the neurological impact of drugs and toxic on living systems. Why spiders? The problem is that the nervous system of arthropods is different from ours, so it is useless to draw conclusions when we want to try effects on humans, but it is interesting to know how these psychoactive substances influence their organism. In 1995, NASA, inspired by Witt’s experiment, chose spiders for new research, but also did it for An ethical issue. They wanted to measure the toxic effect of different compounds, but without resorting to mammals or “higher organisms.” They needed a sensitive and reliable organism, but not controversial. In addition, spiders are perfect because their cobwebs follow fixed and instinctive patterns that, as Witt already demonstrated, was extremely sensitive to chemical alterations. The experiment. Baptized as “Using Spider-Web Patterns to Determine Toxicity“, he experiment It consisted of exposing different European garden spiders to different drugs. To do this, they dissolved a certain amount of drugs in sugary water and administered it directly to the spider through the mouth or by means of flies previously fed with the solution. Once administered, they let each spider weave their air and, later, photographed the web that had been fabric, comparing that creation with cobwebs photographs that those same spiders had made before applying the drug. If you get drugs, don’t tile. The results They speak for themselves: In addition, the methodology was stricter than the one carried out by Witt half a century earlier when using statistical tools to measure changes in the number of complete sides of the ‘cells’ of each web and the general regularity of the design. In other words: high doses of caffeine, for example, and because it is the one that produces the most chaotic result, generated disorganized and incomplete patterns. Until the lowest doses they already allowed irregularities to be observed in the web that allowed researchers to correlate toxicity with tissue morphology. Consequences. We must not be a genius for this, but the greater the toxicity, the more incomplete and chaotic the web was. But the most important thing is that this thorough methodology of NASA converted the experiment In an alternative to traditional toxicity tests, especially in a scenario that, as we said, had less tolerance to tests with other types of animals. They were biological evidence, yes, and chemicals were also administered to living beings, but in a little invasive way and without losing rigor. And, precisely, the visibility of this work helped the debate on animal ethics to increase even more, evidencing that alternative, but economic methods could be used, with rigorous and replicable results, being more ethical than other models that were made -and they continue to do. Like Witt’s, NASA’s experiment provided very valuable information, but not applicable to humansdue to the differences between the nervous system of a human and other animals … and that of arthropods. For example, caffeine causes total chaos in spiders, but in humans, although It is not good if we want to make certain decisionsIt does not produce the same effects. Image | Das Morton In Xataka | If the question is “how much caffeine each cup of coffee or tea has”, this graph offers revealing responses

If the question is “how much caffeine each cup of coffee or tea has”, this graph offers revealing responses

by

Every day, the world consumes about 2,250 million coffee cups. Let’s drink for their Health effectsbut also for its flavor and for caffeine. This substance surrounded by myths It is the psychoactive more consumed and is present in a lot of products outside coffee such as tea, sodas or energy drinks. Now, not all caffeine drinks have the same amount, and in this graph we can see how much caffeine your favorite coffee or infusion has, with an incontestable winner: the espresso. But there are many nuances. The figures. There are many ways to prepare coffee. In the Italian classic, With filterpercolation, infusion and even with unthinkable supplements until not as much as Protein either Fungi. And the amount of caffeine of each elaboration depends both on the caffeine of the grains of each variety of coffee, its roasted process and the way of cooking it. Caffeine for 30 ml of drink Espresso coffee 62.5 mg Filter coffee 22 mg infused coffee 17 mg Coffee for percolation 15 mg Matcha 8.75 mg mate 4-6 mg Black or green 4-6 mg Instantaneous 1.9 mg MILK CHOCOLATE 1 mg Decaffeinated instant coffee 0.6 mg Very roasted coffee decaffeinated 0.4 mg As the graphic prepared by Visual Capitalist With studies data from Health Canada and Consumer Reportscoffee with a greater concentration of caffeine is the espresso. As much, in addition: in 30 milliliters of drink, it has almost four times more caffeine than the following elaboration, and twelve times more than a black tea. The rest of coffee elaborations are quite pair, but we continue to see a greater concentration of caffeine than in the Matcha tea so popular latelyin the mate or in other tea infusions. If the Italians already knew … That the espresso has the greatest concentration is not a surprise and, in fact, it is an essential part of this elaboration. In it, by the extraction method itself, both flavor and intensity are intensified, increasing that concentration of caffeine. And it is something with a practical function. In the Italian traditionthe espresso was born to be fast. The coffee had to be extracted in the shortest possible time, standing at the bar of the bar and continuing with the day. Traditionally, it is taken without milk, as if it were a sucking sucking that is rapidly sipping, implying a break on the workers’ day, but also that energy ‘chute’ thanks to caffeine. It is a more practical drink than anything else, or it was. The ‘deception’. But of course, we must bear in mind that there is a very important factor in these data: The size of the cup. 30 milliliters is scarce, and it is the amount of an espresso. The coffee size that is usually taken is much larger, so it ends up compensating for the lower concentration of caffeine in other elaborations. An example is the Cold Brew, which is a Perfect infusion for summer that we take in a long glass of more than 300 milliliters. Adding the quantity and long extraction times, the caffeine goes to 200-280 mg per cup. The filtered coffee is also taken in high volumes, contributing between 95 and 150 mg per cup, and something similar occurs with the French press and its contribution of between 80 and 100 mg of caffeine. If we talk per liter, Newcastle University He found That the espresso is the absolute queen, but in the amount of drink we can take, the easiest thing is that there are many elaborations that exceed that contribution of the espresso. Caffeine per liter Espresso 4,200 mg Cold Brew 2,240 mg Moka 2,192 mg French press 742 mg Drip 692 mg How much caffeine is a lot of caffeine. And although there are more and more studies that suggest that caffeine is not a problem nor is it cause of heart attacksa question that is still on the table is how much coffee is too coffee. A study by the European Food Security Authority revealed that the unique doses of 200 mg are not any problem and that a maximum of 400 mg for an adult is fine. In pregnant women and infants, the thing changes and the figures are reduced, but the general measure is about 5.7 mg/kg of the person to talk about safe amounts. But, as we said, it is something that depends a lot because not only does the elaboration come into play, but The origin, variety and roasted of coffeesince it is something that vary the amount of caffeine in the final elaboration. And that is good or not so healthy depends a lot on the situation, such as If dream is missing or if we are going to do some sport. In Xataka | Eating red or chocolate fruits can make you have a better long -term memory. This says science about it

Specialty coffee is expensive and there is something that increases it even more: to remove caffeine

by

For many, drinking coffee is almost a daily ritual. There are those who take it for pleasure or by necessity, but there is also the case of Who wants all their benefitsexcept Caffeine. There are many ways to decaffeinate coffee, and not all are equally healthy. Among all methods, we know two that are employees for specialty coffee to remain specialty. Now, they are tremendously technical and more expensive than the most general methods. Market. The demand for decaffeinated coffee is experiencing sustained growth in recent years. In more commercial coffees Like capsules Or snapshots, we have decaffeinated varieties for a long time, but increasingly easy to find options among specialty coffees. Depending on the indicator we take (total market or only grains), and depending on the analysis, it is esteem That the decaffeinated coffee bean market was $ 31,580 million in 2024, with a projection to 41,050 million dollars by 2032. Others analysis They estimate it at 6,740 million in 2023, with a growth up to 12,330 million by 2031. The way they are, in what they coincide is that it is a upward market. Controversy without decaffeinar. Something that has also increased is awareness about what we eat. Maintaining a healthy lifestyle depends on a lot of factors, and that saying of “we are what we eat” points in an adequate direction. Why do I say this? Because there are several ways to eliminate coffee from coffee (although there is always a certain residual percentage), but not all are as natural as we would like. The two most used methods are precisely the most controversial. One is the one who uses methylene chloride to dissolve caffeine. In the process, the solvent is eliminated by evaporation and grains, subsequently, it is washed and dry, passing controls so that the solvent residues are maintained below the legal limits. The other uses ethyl acetate, which is a compound that is found naturally in some fruits and the process is the same as in methylene chloride. Although it is considered more natural, it is still a chemical solvent that can also leave an aroma impregnated in coffee. More natural processes. These processes in which solvents are used have been at the point of view of organizations such as the United States Food and Medicines Administration, being the methylene chloride in the conversation. But there are other methods that are used to substantially reduce the coffee level of coffee. One is the swiss water process. In it, the grains immerse themselves in hot water to dissolve caffeine. Then, the water goes through active carbon filters that retain only caffeine and this process is repeated until the grains contain a minimum percentage of caffeine. Image: Swiss Water Process Another is the one who uses Supercritical co₂. In it, the grains undergo high pressures and expose themselves to CO₂ in a supercritical state, acting as a selective solvent for caffeine. Decaffeination through the supercritical co₂ method | Image: James Hoffmann Technology to coffee power. That they are more natural does not imply that there is no sophisticated technological network after the process. James Hoffman, one of the reference baristas for coffee world lovers, has visited facilities in which this decaffeination process is carried out through the Swiss Water technique and we can see that … it is a fairly boring environment: There are simply drums, silos and warehouses in which that “soaking” of the grains, drying and storage is being carried out. But the key is in the control room. Hoffmann cannot show us the graphs that are used to control these processes, but comments that they have computers connected to probes that, in real time, send information of the caffeine present in the grains in several points of the process. Thus, the technicians are adjusting the process until leaving the caffeine necessary to be considered decaffeinated without altering the properties of the grains themselves. The great drums | Image: James Hoffmann And the cabin in which the information of all the sensors is collected to send it to the technicians responsible for supervising the process | Image: James Hoffmann Specialty. These are two more natural methods because they do not use chemicals or solvents, and something for which they are appreciated is because they better retain both the aromas and the original aromas of the grains. And there is a segment that interests that this is: that of specialty coffee. In the search for a coffee with a better flavor, but above all more sustainable for both farmers and the planet, the specialty coffee is earning a hole between palates both understood and profane. In regions such as Europe and North America, the global specialty coffee market is growing at a 10% annual rate. Of $ specialty coffee. Now, decaffeinated specialty coffee is 1 + 1. The specialty coffee is expensive because there is a meticulous process behind. They are selected crops, the harvests are usually done by hand, they have strict control processes for washing and drying, implies fair trade, more sustainable practices and a lower volume. All that makes it a more expensive coffee both to produce and buy. But, in addition, processes such as Swiss Water or the Supercritical Co₂, due to its complexity, the time that is required and, especially in the case of the supercritical co₂, due to the infrastructure to be mounted, make this type of coffee even more. They take away the caffeine, but add some cents to the price. Tags. That is why the methods without solvents are more used in the decaffeination processes of instant coffee, capsule or the most common mixtures that we find in the bar and the supermarket, while the most natural and expensive methods are those associated with decaffeinated specialty coffee. If you are a consumer worried about this, the way of knowing how your favorite coffee has been decaffiled is … Looking for information and look at the labels. When a coffee uses methods such as the supercritical CO2 … Read more

The Swiss invention that wants to revolutionize how you consume caffeine

by

Preparing that daily coffee has become a ritual for many. The choice of a good coffee, prepare it in the Coffee maker that we like the most and with accessories that we have been buying Little by little they are part of a process that goes beyond the pragmatism of “making coffee.” However, we do not always have the time or the possibility of doing so, and that is where canned coffee comes into play. Tube coffee, to be more exact. Travel coffee. For those who cannot spend a day without a couple of coffees, traveling is a headache. You do not know if you will find a good cafeteria and, if you load with the equipment, as you can carry something like an aeropress or a Portable coffee makera coffee bag already ground (which is losing properties) and you will need hot water to perform the process. And that’s where the Swiss company ‘non -normal’ has seen a hole to do business: sell coffee in paste. Not normal. The idea It was the work of two passionate about coffee and adventure that “reject mediocre coffee” and that, due to their excursions, needed to find a way of having instant coffee, good taste and easy access. They occurred to them to create a coffee paste that is stored in a tube, such as toothpaste. It is a coffee extract that, according to them, can be prepared directly next to water or hot or cold milk. Depending on the amount of liquid used, we will have a more or less long coffee, but we must bear in mind that the roasting of the grains is strong, which moves it away from many palates. The color of the pasta itself or coffee is ready is a fairly clear indicator. Coffee to chew. Not being a dust, this coffee can give game to experimentation, and those responsible have put some examples that have made me lift my eyebrow: spreading it in a toast (in the comments someone has tried this, as we will see later), combining it with banana or chocolate … and mixing it with yogurt and oatmeal. There is also a photo on its website on which it consumes it directly from the tube, as if it were an energy gel. By the way, these are your ingredients: 46% of Arabica coffee from Colombia. 15% of Colombia’s Arabica ground coffee. Swiss beet sugar, water and thickening. Specialty price. They affirm That it is tastier than most instant coffee because it is concentrated coffee, retains the flavors of newly prepared coffee and have selected roasted grains so that the product is the best possible. As for the price, there is only one option right now: the strong tums. Each tube costs 17.95 euros (more than 10 euros of shipping to Spain) and gives for 20 cups if we apply five grams services each time. There are options such as three pipes for 53.85 euros or six for 86.16 tubes, these two free shipping options. Caffeine. The tubes have a useful life of up to 12 months if it closes correctly and does not need a refrigerator for its conservation. And, at this point, something you can ask yourself is how much caffeine has a “coffee concentrate” like this. Caffeine is still A concern For many people, although there is evidence that it is needed take a huge amount So that we notice any consideration, and each service of five grams has about 47 mg of caffeine. On the web, They clarify that a conventional espresso have about 63 mg of caffeine and that the teaspoon of its pasta has more … or less. In the end, it is something that depends on both conventional espresso and the coffee variety or, if we talk about the non -normal coffee, the amount of pasta we use. What seems, at least much of the advertising that accompanies this coffee so, is that the target user is athlete and mountaineer, who is the one who has most complicated would have access to caffeine a hot coffee during their activities. Flavor? That is the big question. The commercial video makes me funny for the face that one of those responsible for the coffee puts after trying it, but it is obviously impossible to judge something like that until it is proven. I am not one of those who trust the assessments of the users within the websites of the owners of a product, but it is curious to see the difference in criteria when assessing its flavor. Most of the Scores They are very positive -logical-, but beyond that detail, it is interesting to see that there are several comments that claim that it is a bit sweet for their standards … and others comment that too strong. There are those who say that it has too much sugar and others that have very little. They also emphasize that “she knows horrible” smeared in a toast (I have to try that) and there are those who comment that it is a good idea, but that he would like to see a model with an average gang. As I say, it is funny to see the difference in opinions due to the variety of palates and the sensations before the same product, but what stands out is something that, regardless of the flavor that may have, seems evident: its practicality. Images | Not normal In Xataka | The first step to improve coffee you drink is to grind it yourself. Science has the explanation

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.