The Pentagon includes BYD, Unitree, Alibaba and other Chinese giants on its blacklist. It’s taking away competition with cannon shots

The river already sounded at the end of 2025: the Pentagon agreed that Chinese giants like Alibaba, BYD and Baidu They were linked to the Chinese Army. It was unclear at the time whether the companies would be included on the Pentagon’s 1260H list, but it was clearly a warning and came just three weeks before Donald Trump and Xi Jinping agreed to a trade truce. It seemed like things had calmed down, especially with more recent moves like the opening of the market for Nvidia can sell its GPUs H200 for AI or Donald Trump’s visit to China (accompanied by several CEOs of American companies) to ease tensions and maintain a fine balance in that trade truce. But it turns out not and, as they point in Reuters, Alibaba, BYD and Baidu are the new Chinese companies on the Pentagon’s list. And they are not the only ones. Many more Chinese companies on the Pentagon’s blacklist The update of the known list 1260H It had been expected for a long time. The November thing was a warning, but not a real update. It is now, one month after Donald Trump’s diplomatic visit to Beijing, that the Pentagon has launched the new version that reflects interesting changes. Because we have mentioned Alibaba, BYD and Baidu as companies that join that selector ‘club’ of companies for which there are still no direct sanctions, but there is a clear consequence: starting at the end of this month, the United States Department of Defense will have prohibited from contracting directly with any of these companies. And… what are they? Well, it turns out that there are a lot, and from all sectors. Alibaba and Baidu are two Internet giants (like putting Amazon and Google on the list respectively, wow), but there are also the aforementioned BYD -cars and batteries-, CXMT and YMTC -semiconductors and RAM memory-, Unitree and RoboSense -robotics- or WuXi AppTec -biotechnology-. It is a very curious list because they are companies that are competing, directly, against American or Taiwanese companies. For example, we have recently told how the technology industry is looking so much at CXMT like YMTC for get a RAM memory which they cannot access through traditional means due to the component crisis. The United States and China are immersed in the war over robotics and Unitree is one of the most advanced in both humanoid and quadruped robots (something China is exploring for military use). Precisely, Nvidia announced that it was going to work closely with Unitree for the development of robots. And then there is China BlueChemical Limited, a subsidiary of state oil company CNOOC, and Baicells, which makes telecommunications equipment. As we say, there are no consequences in the form of direct sanctions on these companies or with pressure like what happens with Huawei, but according to US law, the Department of Defense will not be able to make deals with these companies starting this month and, starting in 2027, it will not be able to buy their products or services through third parties. What do Chinese companies say? As we read so much in Reuters as in GuardianAlibaba considers that it is something that has no basis because “Alibaba is not a Chinese military company nor part of any military-civil fusion strategy”, ensuring that they will take “all available legal actions against attempts to tarnish the company”. Baidu, for its part, also rejection the measure, ensuring that “the suggestion that Baidu is a military company is completely unfounded”, noting that they will not hesitate to “use all immediate measures to be removed from the list.” This is something that WuXi AppTec has also responded to and it is possible to get off that list, but only if they withdraw from the United States or if they change the name of the entity. “These Chinese companies are working with the Chinese military against our national interests” – John Moolenaar From the Pentagon it is stated that publicly traded companies have ballots to be classified as “Chinese military companies”, although they can request their removal from the list, according to Pentagon representatives. House Select Committee Chairman Joihn Moolenaar was somewhat more direct, noting that updating the list “It’s a warning to American companiesall levels of government and for the American people themselves”, ensuring that “these Chinese companies are working with the Chinese military against our national interests.” In Reuters, Craig Singleton, an expert on relations with China, points out that Washington no longer treats Chinese companies as isolated entities, but as a strategic conglomerate that is part of an arm of the Chinese government. In Xataka | A Chinese company has been building AI for years to predict who is going to criticize the government before they do so

While Anthropic goes on the US blacklist, the Pentagon already has someone to succeed him: OpenAI

The pentagon gave an ultimatum to Anthropic to accept the unlimited use of its AI models for applications of all kinds, including espionage and military use. The deadline arrived, at 5:01 p.m. this Friday, February 27, and Anthropic said no: he would be faithful to his principles. The sword of Damocles has fallen on the company led by Dario Amodei and the United States has completed its threats. How did he communicate? A few hours ago, United States Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, for the Pentagon, Anthropic is already a “risk to the supply chain.” The context. This chronicle of a death foretold has been meeting its deadlines and everyone has remained in their initial position: Anthropic rejected the Pentagon’s lawsuit over concerns about the use of AI for mass civilian surveillance and the development of weapons capable of firing without human intervention. The company behind Claude has already announced that he will contest. We will have to see the cost of maintaining his position. The United States will apply a sanction that until now we had only seen applied to companies from rival countries, Huawei is one of the clearest examples. What’s going to happen now. Leaving aside the fact that the president of the United States refers to Anthropic as “a radical left-wing and woke company” on your social network Truth Socialthe US Ministry of Defense has carried out its threat, which has come into effect immediately: It will terminate its contract with Anthropic, valued at up to $200 million, and as announced Peter Hegseth, no contractor, supplier or partner doing business with the United States Armed Forces may do business with Anthropic. There will be a six-month period for the Pentagon and other government agencies to transition Claude to alternatives. OpenAI said yes. The United States already has a company to provide its services to the Pentagon and other agencies: OpenAI. Sam Altman announced the agreement to deploy its models on its classified network explaining that the Department of Defense had shown a “deep respect for security” and that both AI security and broad benefit sharing are the foundation of its mission. Among the security principles specifically mentioned by Altman are the prohibition of domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including autonomous weapons systems. According to the CEO of OpenAI, the War Department is aligned with these principles. Likewise, he explained that they will apply technical safeguards to guarantee the correct behavior of their models. Claude’s shadow is long. Saying goodbye overnight to your reference AI company (even with that transition period) and putting a veto on other companies working with it is a tricky measure to put into practice as it is behind recent strategic operations, such as Maduro’s arrest and others imminent. Likewise, it leaves projects such as that of Palantirwhich Claude uses. behind the scenes. According to AxiosDeputy Secretary of Defense Emil Michael was in talks with Anthropic to offer a deal just as Pete Hegseth dropped the bomb on X/Twitter. This theoretical agreement would have allowed the collection or analysis of data on US citizens, such as location, web browsing or financial information. At the moment it is unknown if this interest of the Pentagon in collecting personal data legally applies to OpenAI. In Xataka | IBM has been living for decades that no one could kill COBOL. Anthropic has other plans In Xataka | Anthropic and OpenAI have developed AI. The US Pentagon is showing you who really owns it Cover | Tomasz Zielonka

the unwritten rules and the blacklist for those who jump them

Ferrari is much more than a luxury car brand: It is a symbol of exclusivity and reputation that transcends economic power. Have a Ferrari in the garage not only It implies being a millionaireit also implies being worthy of him and respecting the brand. The Italian firm is known for exercising iron control about how their vehicles are shown in public and only admits as customers those who defend and represent their philosophy. Who do not comply those unwritten rulesThey run the risk of entering a blacklist. In doing so, Ferrari may allow them to buy ferraris of their “mid -range” like the Ferrari Romathe 296 GTB, but they can never buy one of the “premium”, such as the Ferrari EnzoLaferrari or the Ferrari F80for many millions that offer for them. In your download, Ferrari is not the only one that uses this strategy. Bugatti also applies vetoes to your unworthy customers. In fact, there are numerous stories of millionaires and celebrities who, when skipping these unwritten rules, have become part of that feared black list of Ferrari, and have even had to go through the courts. Good ferrarista manual Ferrari is clear that The value of its logo It goes far beyond the design of your cars. It is a matter prestige and tradition. Therefore, it closely monitors the use made of each of its vehicles, from the moment They leave the concessionaire until its appearance in public or social networks. Such is Ferrari’s zeal for this matter, that customers sign a contract with certain mandatory conditions before withdrawing their concessionaire car. This covers from the express prohibition of changing the color of the Ferrari, to the refusal to allow Ferrari’s emblem to be replaced or removed from the car. But the owners’ commitment to the brand goes further. Ferrari demands that the car be preserved in perfect condition, use in a responsible manner and never appear in situations that may attempt against their reputation. As recognized Benedetto Vigna, CEO of the brand: “We have to pay attention because we have to defend the values and identity of the brand.” The reasons and names behind the blacklist The main candidates to enter Ferrari’s blacklist are those millionaires who Tunish your cars In extravagant forms, they use the Ferrari for advertising purposes without the permission of the brand or They resell the car Before time. The brand makes it clear that it does not want to associate its logo to scandals, negative news or unique behaviors of its drivers. Ferrari 458 Justin Bieber’s tuned that brought him to the black list of Ferrari Many celebrities have fallen into the blacklist for concrete and documented reasons. Justin Bieber, for example, was excluded to forget for three weeks Where he had parked his Ferrari 458 tuning electric blue. Such and as they counted in Motorpasionthe DJ Deadmau5 is also vetoed after customizing its 458 with motifs of the video game Nyan Cat and call it “Purrari 458“, something that the brand considered disrespect. Philipp Plein fashion designer was sued by the brand for using his Ferrari 812 Superfast as a background for Advertise some shoes of your clothing brand. The court said that Plein should even pay compensation of 300,000 euros to Ferrari. Ferrari doesn’t care about money or fame Ferrari does not care how much money you have even if you are popular or how many Ferrari you have in your garage. If you enter the blacklist, you run out of ferraris. An example of it It’s Floyd Mayweatherwho came to possess up to 16 supercars of the brand, but was vetoed because the brand assured that it bought their cars only to show off and sell them soon, without assessing their works of art. A reason similar to that the brand alleged to put Kim Kardashian In his blacklist. Nicolas Cage or 50 Cent, seem to have the permanent veto for their financial problems or their unfortunate comments. The impertérrito actor sold his Ferrari Enzo for a price well below its valuestressed by the payment of some debts. That was not enough justification for the brand, which wrote its name in the infamous list with indelible ink. In Xataka | The Ferrari F150 Muletto M4 has been key in the history of Ferrari. The problem is that it has also been the ugliest Image | Barrett -JacksonFerrari

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.