Mobile Tech & Gadgets

Farmers expect one of the worst harvest of what is going on the century

by

Pessimism is making its way in the grape sector. As the vintage season progresses in the different wine regions of our environment, the problems do not stop growing. The first was the price, with the farmers on a war for some prices that consider “ruinous”now, to this is added pessimism regarding the volume of the harvest. 34 million hectoliters. The 2025 harvest It is on its way to becoming In one of the worst views in recent years as the union of small farmers and livestock (UPA) recently stressed. Your concern is based on Estimates of the agro-food cooperative sector organization of Spain that indicate that this year’s wine production will be about 34 million hectoliters. As a contrast, The UPA points outan average season the wine production would be around 40-43 million hectoliters. From optimism to pessimism. The new estimate implies a remarkable cut with respect to the initial calculations, which trusted them to produce this year about 37.5 million hectoliters of wine and must. This fall is a reflection of an important change in the perception of what this harvest would be: of a optimism marked by the end of drought We have moved to a context in which pessimism predominates. Meteorology not so favorable. Meteorology has played an important role. The arrival of the rains seemed to bring new hopes to an agricultural sector punished by drought. However, hail storms, numerous this year, have taken its toll. He has also left his imprint in the harvest an extremely warm and drier summer than usual: the high temperatures of last month (in which we saw an intense heat wave) and the lack of rainfall have made a dent in the harvest, according to the UPA. More perhaps than meteorology, the sector also worries the climate: the UPA He also stood out The vulnerability of the sector to climate change, whose negative impact estimated at about 439,788 hectoliters, 1.4% of the harvest. The impact of the Mildiu. Another factor mentioned by the sector is that of Mildiu. This plants’ disease is a disease caused by fungi that infect plants and causes problems that end up being reflected in the productivity of the field. This Andalusia year, La Rioja, and Castilla y León have been the most affected communities according to the organization. A cGlobal RISIS. The volume of the harvest is just one of the problems that concern farmers. In its statement, the UPA also speaks of the uncertainty posed by the new US tariff policy, as well as the controversial reform of the common agricultural policy, the PAC. Although perhaps this year the great source of controversies has been economical. There have been several occasions in which farmers have protested because they consider that the prices offered by the wineries are not fair and that they focus on the crisis to their sector. To this we must add a structural problem in the sector, and that is that changes in consumption patterns have significantly punished the consumption of wine and many other alcoholic beverages. In Xataka | The Canary Islands banana is dead and does not know: Spain is an agricultural giant with mud feet Image | Mali Maeder

We knew that the Dart mission changed Dimorphos’ trajectory. What we did not know is that its form also changed

by

At the end of September 2022, the Dart mission (Double Asteroid Redirection Test) It made historyInterestingly, stamping against an asteroid. The milestone was not on the impact itself but on achieving with him slightly divert the trajectory of an asteroid, Dimorphos. The expected and the unexpected. In the almost three years since then, we have been learning New details on the effects of Dart’s impact on Asteroid Dimorphos. Now we know, for example, that Dart not only managed to divert the orbital trajectory of the space rock; He also achieved with his impact to make the asteroid orbit deform significantly What happened. The asteroid, explained the team, initially had an oblate form, that is, flattened in the poles, such as the earth, “the shape of a hamburger.” After the impact, Dimorphos became a rather prolata, elongated in the poles, like a rugby ball. “For the most part, our predictions pre-impact on how Dart would change the way Didymos and her moon (Dimorphos) move in space were correct,” ” explained in a press release Derek Richardson, who led the analysis of the effects of the probe. “But there are some unexpected discoveries that help provide a better image on how asteroids and other small bodies are formed and evolved over time.” Tumbos. According to the team that analyzed these orbital changes, the impact would have made dimorphs pass from a state of equilibrium with its main asteroid Didymos similar to that of our moon with the earth, to an irregular one. That is, dimorphs always gave the same face to Didymos, at least Until Dart arrived. Now the system is out of its alignment, Richardson pointed out. This implies that it can stagger changing orientation, even ending up “tumbos”, rotating chaotically and unpredictable. Asteroid formation. Thanks to studies such as the one conducted by Richardson and the team, we can access new clues about the formation of asteroids. As explained by the team, the impact released small rocks that remained in the orbit of the asteroid system. These contributed to altering the orbital movement in the system, but these changes in the gravitational balance do not seem to have altered the form of didymos. This implies, the team added, that the main asteroid of the system was rigid and firm enough to maintain its form after the formation of its moon dimorphs. The details of the work were Published in an article In the magazine Planetary Science Journal. Hera’s turn. The scientific community now has new eyes on the Didymos system, those of Herathe mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) aimed at monitoring the system and collect new data In situ. If everything continues as planned, Hera will begin in October a trip that will lead her to reach the double asteroid towards the end of 2026. The data compiled by Hera They will allow an even more exhaustive analysis of the impact of the Dart mission. This in turn will be what gives us key clues that allow us to plan missions that protect our planet from the asteroid shock. In Xataka | The European Hera probe has just sent us its first photos for the story: we orbit Mars Image | NASA/JOHNS HOPKINS APL/STEVE GRIBBEN *An earlier version of this article was published in September 2024

The human brain works as a predictive machine. The question is if a Cyborg future awaits us: 1×22 crossover

by

We have a new episode of Crossover, the 1×22, and attentive because this time the topic is so interesting and has given so much that we have dedicated the entire program. Thus, this time we have been able to interview the Dr. José Sánchezneuroscientific and disseminator, which investigates How the brain worksemotions and Intelligence. In this interview of just over an hour Sánchez makes us an introduction to his experience with this area and then start with a unique idea: that the brain is a predictive machine. It also speaks to us, of course, artificial intelligence – the generative is of course A predictive machine– And with human emotions, but then the thing gets interesting. And he does it because with him we chat of the impact, present and Neuralink future and brain chips of other rivals. How will that impact our future? Will we end up being something like Cyborgs? We do not know, but before that happens, there is another debate we are talking about: that of social relationships and how these advances can affect mental health. Without a doubt, a spectacular episode that we hope you enjoy as much as we have enjoyed seeing it. Do not hesitate to comment, please, both here and in the YouTube channel itself. On YouTube | Crossover

His motivations have gone far beyond salary

by

The gene generation It is revolutionizing The current work dynamics at a rate that exceeds any other generation. His arrival at the labor market has not been easy: his first jobs were marked by pandemic and the isolation of remote work, and his future depends on a technology that, for the moment, You are subtracting opportunities of employment. According to collected data By Randstad 54% of the respondents of this age range affirm that the labor market constantly traces In search of a new opportunity Professional and 33% plan to leave their current job in less than a year. In large part, that change is not motivated by the promise of better salaries or disloyalty: they do so for continuing to improve their skills and become better professionals. A lifetime job. Until the middle of the last century, it was very common for a person to start in a job when he was young and stayed in the same company throughout your life until retirement. At present that scenario is Very unlikely And, the most common is to change jobs from time to time. He Randstad report It indicates that the young people of the Z generate only remain an average of 1.1 years in their jobs, compared to the 1.8 years of the millennials, the 2.8 years of generation X and the 2.9 years on average of the boomers. According The published by The Wall Street Journalthe change of work no longer guarantees salary improvements as it did a few years ago, and the difference in increasing salary between who remain In their positions and those who change their jobs. “As a result, permanence in the position is being reduced: today’s young workers change work faster than any previous generation,” explain the authors of the report. Motivation: Advance and learn. Far from the extended image of disloyalty, the data collected by Randstad shows that the motivations that labor rotation It is not the lack of commitment, but the improvement of their skills and the desire to progress in your professional career. 68% declare that they maintain their commitment to their current jobs, but their values ​​are not aligned with those of the companies that hire them or do not contribute to Your professional growth. Only 56% of young people surveyed say that their current job It fits your needscompared to 63% of Baby Boomers. In addition, 40% of generation Z claim to always take into account its long -term professional objectives when changing jobs, which represents the highest percentage among all generations that currently They live in the labor market. A labor market that excludes them. To the usual uncertainty that surrounds all professional career, generation Z must add the pressure who is exercising AI over its jobs, forcing them to learn In forced marches not to be excluded from a labor market in which they still do not have their hole. That is making many of these young people change the sector guiding their professional careers towards jobs that they do not have such a direct impact of AI, as In the health sector and even in the so -called professions blue collar. “Economic volatility, the decrease in initial level opportunities and the impact of AI on skills profiles have not decreased the appetite of generation Z for advancing in their work,” explain the authors of the Randstad study. The key to retaining them: motivation and training. In the opinion of Reyes SuárezHR Team Leader in Randstad Professionals, “the Gen Z live in a constant immediacy and are much more daring. It is like the search for dopamine when using social networks and that derives in an unpaid ambition. In that sense, they are much more impatient than previous generations, which, on the other hand, were too cautious.” Suarez ensures that the formula to retain them is “to face that boldness by raising very well parameterized career plans and that they are clearly communicated.” According to report data ‘Workmonitor 2024‘Prepared by Randstad, 30% of young people claimed to have left their work for the lack of opportunities in professional progression and two out of five trusts that their employer will invest in their continuous learning, especially in AI and technology. In Xataka | “They are much more daring.” Image | Pexels (Ivan Samkov)

They do them for them and companies are taking action

by

The remote work interviews They have become fertile terrain for candidates to use AI as a cheat assistant and simply read the answers that the assistant facilitates in real time. A survey of the interview simulation portal with AI interviewing.io It points to the fact that 81% of the interviewers suspect that candidates use AI During their interviews, while 31 % have already confirmed it. The dilemma: traps or tools? One of the most striking cases of use of AI in the Cluelystartup founded by two Columbia student to solve technical interviews with the help of An undetectable For the interviewer. After discovering the deception, the University suspended it for “academic dishonesty.” However, the approach of the two students He opened a debate: Is it a trap to use a calculator or spelling corrector of the text editor or are they tools that everyone uses in their usual work? Increasingly hard interviews. To respond to these practices of candidates who hide the use of AI attendees during their interviews, companies have hardened the processes. As the analyst and engineer points out Gergely Orosz In one of the entries from your newslettersome companies are already changing the content of the interviews so that they are more open and require a logical route and not simply remain in the copy and paste of the Training questions that appear on platforms Training as Leetcode. Orosz stressed that the interviewers of large companies as a goal, are already obliged to indicate whether there are suspicions that the candidate is cheating at any point in the selection process, not only in technical tests. Thus, interviews are less vulnerable to the use of AI. According to statements From a finish line, “we demand the candidates to share their entire screen and deactivate all the background filters (including the blur) in most interviews” to reduce the possibility of external support. According to collected India TodayAmazon has already made it clear that “the use of unauthorized during interviews can lead to immediate disqualification” of the hiring process. Prohibit interviews. The dilemma facing technological press to use them In all possible processes. While some companies prohibit the use of AI In their interviews, others explore otherwise. According The published by Business InsiderGoal is allowing to use AI assistants in some of their work interviews. According to the company, “candidates can use AI tools in the same way that engineers do in their day to day.” What do you know how to do with AI? In that same line, other companies such as Canva move, which Incentives use of AI tools in their interviews to assess the skills of the candidates in this area. As stated, Farhan Thawar, Shopify engineering manager at A recent interviewin the selection processes of their department they let the candidates use what they want. “I love it. Because what happens now is that Ia sometimes generates pure garbage. When the candidate uses an AI assistant, I like to see the code generated. I ask them: What do you think? Is it a good code? Isn’t it a good code? Is there any problem?” That approach puts the AI ​​in the place that will occupy in its real position, since one of the tasks of the candidate It will be to check code generated by Ia. The return of the face -to -face. On the other hand, given the increase in fraud, some companies are recovering face -to -face interviews. Great technology such as Google, Cisco and McKinsey have reintroduced at least A face -to -face round. According to a Gartner report72.4 % of those responsible for selection are already applying it to reduce fraud In work interviews since face -to -face interviews allow you to verify the immediate reasoning, communication and reaction skills of the candidates. “Teleworking and advances in artificial intelligence have facilitated more than ever the infiltration of false candidates in the hiring process,” declared to Computerworld Scott McGuckin, Vice President of Acquisition of Global Talent of Cisco In Xataka | “I am very perfectionist”: the answer that recruiters no longer want to hear in work interviews Image | Pexels (Edmond Dantès)

The culture of queuing in UK is so powerful that many British suffer a real cultural shock by “asking for the time”

by

“The other day I go to the post office and everyone is sitting everywhere, in a corner of the room, etc … there is no tail.” So explained The British Tiktoker @edwardthelife What for him is “one of the greatest greatest cultural differences: the fact that in Spain” is asked at the same time. “ And it may seem an exaggeration, but (in the light of comments) it makes sense: “An English, even being alone, will form an orderly tail of a person,” said George Mikes and Check the anthropologist Kate Fox: The British loves to queue each other. Or, at least, they have them so within their cultural conception of the world that they make them by default, almost without realizing it. But does it make sense? The theory of tails. As it seemsthe first serious mathematical study on the queues was made by a Danish, Agner Krarup Erlang. His intention was to know how to dimension the telephone switches to attend optimally. At that time, the operators had to manage the calls manually and the intention of the Danish mathematician was how to reduce the queues without spending disproportionate. Since then we have learned a lot of interesting things. For example, now we know that common sense (the solution to bottles is to expand the number of lanes) It doesn’t always work. In the case of roads, for example, there is an optimal number for a certain amount of cars: if the number of lanes above that optimal lanes is wide, cars change too much lane and, in the end, the flow becomes slower. But in this case the two are tails, right? Indeed, the fundamental difference between the “English tail” (to call it in some way) and the “Spanish time” (to call it from another) is not that one is a tail and the other does not, but the rules that govern each one. The second, in fact, is still a social/virtual order without physical training. The English, requiring that all members physically make a line, allows us to better ponder the number of people in front of them. The Spanish, having verbal control, allows people to do things in the meantime (or to wait in more comfortable places). Is there any better than another? From what we know about virtual tails, order without physical formation usually Improve satisfaction of users (to the extent that you release the client from “being planted”). However, this system also encourages abandonment more than the other. That is why, when I wait for her It is not too long And therefore release user time does not make sense, a single long row (especially if there are several homogeneous attention positions) It usually favor the feeling of equity. ANDSa may be the most reasonable explanation. Because, in Spain, there are also physical tails. It is when the wait is long or when the physical space does not allow to create a tail easily when “asking for the time” emerges naturally. So I suppose that whoever has to take note of the Tiktoker comments is the mail itself. Most likely, neither space nor the time of waiting is the most recommended. Image | Xiangkun Zhu In Xataka | Charge 38 dollars an hour for saving a tail: the millionaire idea that was born after the launch of the iPhone 5

117,000 will review for autonomous driving failures

by

Xiaomi has announced a campaign that will affect 116,887 units of your electric sedan Su7 due to failures in the driving assistance system. The measure arrives six months after A fatal accident Starring this model lit the alarms on the safety of its level 2 autonomous systems. The background problem. The State Administration for China Market Regulation has determined that the SLE7 motor autopist pilot system presents “insufficient recognition capacity” and may not detect or properly alert over certain risk scenarios. This affects all vehicles made between February 2024 and August 2025. The tragedy that triggered him. Last March, three university students lost their lives in China when their Xiaomi Su7 crashed into a cement post at 97 km/h on a highway. The vehicle circulated in autonomous driving mode and caught fire after the impact, which occurred seconds after the driver recovered control after receiving an obstacle system alert. The technical solution. Xiaomi will address the problem through A free software update that will be sent via Ota (over-the-Air) to the affected vehicles. The company will notify the owners in China through text messages and their mobile application. Regulation. This withdrawal coincides with the hardening of the norms Safety for vehicles with level 2 automation in China. On Wednesday, the authorities published a draft of new security standards that will enter into force in 2027. Under current regulations, level 2 systems require that the driver keep his hands in the steering wheel at all times and pay constant attention. Change of trend. The Xiaomi measure is part of a growing tendency towards greater transparency in the Chinese automobile sector. Recently, Xpeng too He notified his clients For its P7+ model for a failure in the direction, breaking with the previous practice of avoiding call calls in the Chinese market. In the case of Xiaomi, although the campaign consists of a software update that is installed wirelessly in the owner’s car, the Chinese authorities continue to classify it as a ‘call to review’ because it affects the safety of the vehicle, it requires regulatory approval and the manufacturer has to follow a series of notification protocols. In Xataka | China is manufacturing so many cars that concessionaires already send a message to the industry: they do not want to become their warehouses

one that has come to stay

by

Social networks have caused them to increase Mental Health Self -Diagnostics. Fast tests to know if you have ADHD or if you are a PAS person, everything without a professional diagnosis. With AI, a new label is emerging, that of psychosis by AI. Experts are clear about what they think. What’s happening. They count on Wired that the tendency of “psychosis by AI” is reaching psychiatric hospitals. Delusions, hallucinations, paranoia … all with a common element: they have used chatbots ia intensively. In social networks, the term “AI Psychosis” It is popularized with cases such as Kendra, a woman who was made viral in Tiktok For telling the delusional story of how his psychiatrist manipulated her. Even Microsoft’s chief has used the term. These and other cases, such as The teenager who discussed his suicide plans with chatgptthey are feeding the idea that AI can cause us a psychotic outbreak or even something worse. Can Ai become psychotic? Psychosis. Psychosis is a general term that is used in psychiatry to define a state of loss of contact with reality. It is not a disease as such, but a state that can come caused by various causes. It can be a consequence of a bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, but it can also appear due to severe stress, depression, lack of sleep or drug use. Ai pSychosis. L “Psychosis by AI” is not a diagnostic label, at least not for the moment, and For some experts it is problematic because simplifies too much. Many of the cases that have been known, such as Kendra’s in Tiktok, do not respond to a psychotic picture, but to an amplification of false delusions and beliefs. James Maccabe, professor of the Department of Psychosis at the King’s College in Londrés, told Wired that “psychosis by AI is an erroneous term. Delirious disorder due to AI would be a more adequate term.” Catalysts It is more correct to say “delusions by the” than “psychosis by the”, but there is another fundamental aspect and it is the real role that AI plays in all this. There is a hot debate about The effects of AI on mental healthsometimes quite biased. According to This study of Department of Psychiatry of the University of Oxfordchatbots do not cause delusions out of nowhere, but act as a kind of amplifier for those pre -existing ideas, and warn that it can be especially dangerous in vulnerable people or who have some pre -existing mental condition. Echo of a single person. It is a term they use in the study we have just mentioned to define the functioning of the problem. When a person with a delusional belief acts with a chatbot, he does not usually question it, but Responds complicatingly. The person perceives this response as an external and objective validation, making delusional ideas consolidate and can lead to more serious episodes. A new factor. Although “psychosis by AI” is not a diagnostic label, the reality is that many mental health professionals are already being found with cases of this type in their consultation. It is what happened to This San Francisco psychiatristwhich has already treated more than a dozen patients with delusional pictures related to AI. In this sense, AI is becoming A new factor to be treated in consultationin the same way that is already done with drug abuse or lack of sleep. Image | WikipediaOwn edition In Xataka | “I can’t stop”: addiction to talk to AI is already here and there are even help groups to leave it

Why have the ‘antimaltrate bracelets’ become controversial

by

The Antimaltrate ‘braceletsfundamental piece for the control of people with removal orders for cases of gender violence, they star a controversial anger In Spain. A ruling during data dump during the change of winning in 2024 has unleashed the debate on the operation of the system in our country, where there are assets more than 4,500 of these devices. What happened? That the ‘antimaltrate’ bracelets and the Comet systemthe person in charge of his follow -up is in the center of a sour controversy. Sour and delicate because it questions the real efficacy of a device that in theory must ensure the safety of victims of gender violence, guaranteeing that their aggressors respect the departure orders imposed by the courts. It is not the first time that the police warns of the failures on the bracelets, but this time the controversy has reached a special impact, which has generated An intense debate And he has forced so much to Ministry of Equality as to the State Attorney General to move token in an attempt to calm the spirits. After all, he has not only walked the political arena. Especially (and much more important) has sown doubts about the proper functioning of the system. Where does the controversy come from? One of the keys is in an apparently innocuous document, the Annual Report of the Prosecutor’s Office. It speaks of the fact that during a certain period of 2024 there was a “potential unprotection of the victims” of gender violence, an “anomaly” that could have “consequences” both for the instruction phase in the courts and in the judgments themselves, “causing a large amount of provisional dismissals or absolute failures.” The reason for this apparent failure should be sought in a change that affected the system in 2024. And what exactly changed? The company that is responsible for telematic follow -up. Before it was Telefónica, which resorted to the services of Securitas Direct. In 2023, however, the contract was assumed by Vodafone and Securitas. The Revelo announced it In October The operator itself, which specified that the agreement was closed for 42.6 million euros for a period of three years. The change of company could have remained at the foot of the Ministry, but demanded a dump of data between suppliers that, supposedly, The country requirescaused that for a while There would be no information on the movements of people with ‘antimaltrate’ bracelets. That is the episode referred to by the Prosecutor’s Office. And the origin of a controversy that has not stopped growing. Click on the image to go to Tweet. How serious was it? The real scope of that “anomaly”, In the words of the Public Ministryit has been completed little by little, although it differs depending on the source that is consulted. Data migration between suppliers was completed to End of March 2024so the first question is … How long was monitoring altered? And above all, to what extent did it affect the protection of victims? Equality speaks only of “dysfunctions” during the “data itinerance” between suppliers and clarifies that these were solved in 2024 without having a relevant impact. “Information could not be obtained at a specific time of the procedure, but the device worked to control compliance with the aggressor’s departure order with respect to the victim. The problem was turned out at the end of 2024. and in fact in 2025 no incidence has been recorded.” What does the Prosecutor’s Office say? Despite the forcefulness of its annual report, yesterday the State Attorney General’s Calm the spirits clarifying that “the victims were protected at all times.” “The devices worked,” he emphasizes. On the possible acquittals, he says they were “minimal”, which coincides with the government’s message. In A statement Published on Thursday, it argues that the provisional dismissals “were reopened” as soon as the data was recovered and that it was the control center itself that was responsible for sending them to the courts. “The information required by the courts could not be obtained in a specific period of time, but we insist that the device worked. Only 1% of the requests for information prior to March 2024 could not finally be attended,” They add from the Ministry of Equality in statements a The country. How much did the problem last? Today The confidential revealsciting several reports from the Cometa Control Center, that the problems with the bracelets were extended at least eight months of 2024. Specifically, it refers to a February document and another September in which incidents refer. Not just that. Yesterday the same newspaper reported That the observatory against domestic and gender violence has already warned in January 2024 to the Ministry of Risks that, in their opinion, supposed the new ‘antimaltrate’ bracelets after the change of supplier. “We warn him. We warned him that this service did not have the guarantees,” María Ángeles Carmona insistswho then presided over the body. “We did not see that the new system was to work. Among other things because Vodafone had no previous experience in controlling this kind of devices.” Their statements are less surprising if one takes into account that in 2023, during the administrative process to change the service provider, Equality has already given a poor note to the new winner in the section called ‘Transition Plan’: he assigned a 3.6 out of 10, according to It reveals today The country. That’s all? No. The controversy has focused the focus on the renovation of bracelets that caused the change of award. In June the police He already warned of failures in Galicia and you can find news from 2024 They pointed out “challenges” on the devices. It has now been, however, when criticism has risen. Police unions They lament From the lack of reliability in telematic control and even slide that specialized judges are suspicious of the bracelets. “They fail a lot,” they recognize from the collective A The confidentialwhich ensures that it is really nothing new. “The comet system is something that … Read more

Three years after the Fiasco del Metaverso, Zuckerberg has another burning nail for the goal: digital glasses

by

Mark Zuckerberg believes that in 2030 we will not get the smartphone out of his pocket because We will do almost everything from the glasses. That is his particular new obsession, and he has all the meaning of the world because Meta is in a delicate position. And if one It is cornered In the future that does not control, better create one that can control. Glasses, glasses and more glasses. The presentation this week of the promising Goal Ray-Ban Display and his small sisters (Ray-Ban Meta (Gen 2) and Oakley Meta Vanguard) It is a clear message to the world. Zuckerberg He sees us all Taking glasses in the future, and the new options of their connected glasses are precisely aimed not only to make them more with them, but to get more and more forget about the device that has governed our life for two decades: the smartphone. An event to redraw the target of Meta. In the presentation event of the Zuckerberg glasses, he also confirmed that new silent transformation of his company, which first focused on social networks and then bet on everything to the Metaverso. Now the proposal is different and Zuckerberg made it clear in the event saying the following: “Our goal is to create glasses with an attractive design that offer personal superintelligence and a sense of presence through realistic holograms. The combination of these ideas is what we call” metaverso. “ Metaverso V2.0. Suddenly the metaverse now is different from that before. In that metaverso that seemed A bad copy of Wii Sports We have moved to another in which virtual reality is totally displaced. Four years ago, when Facebook changed its name by goal, there was not even talk of artificial intelligence as part of that platform. Now it is a fundamental part, logically. Metaverso 1.0 – who is careful, is still alive and Also losing money– It has remained In the background. Killing smartphone is going to be (very) difficult. Of course, we will need a device in which to be able to do all those things that Zuckerberg proposes, now the candidate is in many cases the mobile. If not as the center of experience, yes as an important element. Will the smartphone give prominence to the glasses or other hardware products? It seems difficultbut of course both goal and others – Hello, OpenAI+Jony Ive– They are willing to achieve that goal. It is normal: if they achieve it, they can control something they have ever managed to control: the hardware. But. If something has characterized Mark Zuckerberg it is his ease to change focus. After the success of Facebook later seemed to focus much more on WhatsApp Supervitaminar –Do you remember Libra?– Or Instagram. Then, of course, his obsession with metoverso would arrive, and more recently With superintelligence and AI glasses. If there is a new technological fever, the Facebook founder usually goes for it. What will be next? And it will have a lot of competition. It is not that Zuckeberg achieves that we use the glasses more than the phone: no one is going to let it do it alone. Google works tirelessly on Android XR and has already shown us that you will have products in this segment, and Apple also seems convinced that the shots will go here. Not to mention Amazon or – major words – of Chinese manufacturers. All of them are going to put it very difficult at the finish line, but one thing is true: if they manage to move the mobile focus on the glasses, there at least they will predictably have part of the cake. Image | Goal In Xataka | The new finish lines will allow to cross a line: seem present while you are completely absent

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.