VAT on electricity returns to 21%

VAT on electricity and gas returns to 21% as of June 1. That’s the news of the day, and before you put your hands on your head thinking about your next bill, breathe, because there is a lot of fabric to cut here. You’re probably wondering: why is this happening? If we have been hearing for months that we have a “renewable shield” that protects us from the global energy crisis, what the hell has happened to give us back the fiscal axe? The short answer is that the system has worked so well that, paradoxically, it has taken away our aid. Spain is facing a strange energy and economic paradox: the good health of our generation system and the moderation of inflation have caused the defense mechanism designed by the Government to blow up. The result is bittersweet and frustrating for the average consumer: we generate the cheapest energy in Europe, but the tax burden on your next bill will return to pre-crisis normality. The CPI trap. The Government has not removed the aid because of a last-minute whim, but because the law itself required it to be done. The anti-crisis decree had a catch or “kill clause”: stated that, if energy prices stopped skyrocketing and did not rise more than 15% compared to April of the previous year, the tax reductions would be automatically canceled in June. And that is exactly what has happened. Data from the National Institute of Statistics (INE) show that the shield has worked. General inflation has slowed to 3.2%. The person largely responsible for this relief? The cheaper energy in our homes: electricity has fallen by 4.3% and gas by 9.6% compared to last year. As prices have shown these negative rates, far from exceeding that legal limit of 15%, the rule has fulfilled its threat. The system has made our energy so cheap that, by law, we lose the exceptional 0.5% bonus on the special tax on electricity and we have to pay VAT on electricity and gas again at 21%. But will the “renewable shield” be of any use? The Ministry of Economy sticks out its chest and celebrates that the moderation of prices demonstrates the capacity of the “renewable shield” and confirms that the Spanish system can absorb external shocks such as the war in Iran. In fact, Spain is resisting much better than its neighbors because the share of clean energy in our generation mix already exceeds 60%. Unlike countries like Italy or Germany, which depend heavily on the gray fringe of fossil generation, Spain’s massive wind and solar deployment sinks wholesale prices during the day. We have even seen historical milestones where the wholesale market has set negative prices of up to -10 euros per megawatt hour (MWh). However, why don’t we notice this renewable miracle on the bill? The wholesale cost of energy represents only 41% of an average household bill. The rest of the amount they swallow it network tolls (23%), VAT (17%), system charges (10%) and commercial margins. Cheap wholesale electricity is necessary, but insufficient if tolls and taxes continue to suffocate the final bill. Be careful when you go to get gas. The INE details that “fuels and lubricants for personal vehicles” They experienced a year-on-year increase in prices of more than 15% (15.5%), dragged down by a huge inflation of 28.2% in diesel. By exceeding the legal threshold of 15%, gasoline will maintain its 10% VAT reduction and aid for professional diesel, at least until June 30. The danger of summer. The withdrawal of part of the light tax shield will be immediately noticeable. According to the calculations of Francisco Valverde, expert analyst in the electricity market in statements for The Newspaperthe return to normal taxes will mean a bill increase of around 15% for all consumers in June. For an average customer, this will imply an additional payment of between 8 and 9 euros, while for gas the upward impact will be between 9% and 10%. But the horizon hides a greater challenge: summer. The analyst Antonio Aceituno warns that our current “hydraulic shield” will begin to give way. With heat waves, solar panels lose efficiency, the use of air conditioning increases demand and expensive gas combined cycles will have to be turned on to avoid blackouts. If the conflict in the Middle East persists, forecasts suggest that the wholesale bill could jump above 100 euros per MWh in June, reaching around 120 euros in the middle of summer. The cracks that no one wants to see. To understand why the renewable miracle does not end up sticking in your pocket, you have to look at the structural flaws that experts denounce: An inelastic and “passive” demand: Joaquín Coronado highlights a huge dysfunction in our market. When electricity reaches ridiculous prices of €0.51/MWh, Spanish consumers do not react by consuming more to take advantage of the bargain. By not using that cheap energy, it ends up being exported by French and Portuguese agents, which paradoxically drags our prices up through European coupling. “All against all” in the sector: According to Coronadothe actors in the Spanish electricity sector are immersed in an internal war, blaming each other and resenting cooperation. The expert suggests that Spain should rethink its institutional architecture, looking to the United Kingdom, where a system operator has been created (National Energy System Operator) with operational independence to separate network planning from asset ownership. The “night fissure”: The transition is incomplete. As evening falls, solar energy disappears and we depend on gas again. Without investments in mass storage systems and batteries to store the day’s excess megawatts, we will continue to be hostage to volatility every time the sun sets. The hidden price of the miracle. The Government’s response plan fulfilled its main objective: to cushion the war and save household purchasing power. We have managed to decouple our system from the worst international gas whims and avoided fuel inflation that would be close to 28.9% without aid. But June … Read more

The ‘Chinese Netflix’ has designed a plan for AI to generate the majority of its content within five years. It sounds risky

iQiyi, China’s largest video streaming service with more than 400 million monthly active users, announced in its annual content presentation in Beijing which expects AI to generate most of its movies and series within five years. Its founder and CEO, Gong Yu, summed it up before a room of producers and directors with a succinct phrase: “It’s a once-in-a-decade opportunity. We have to go with the tide.” Why is it important. iQiyi is not a minor platform betting on a trend. It is the subsidiary of streaming of Baidu, shares with Alibaba and Tencent the online video oligopoly in China, and operates in the streaming largest in the world by number of users. Whether it decides to pivot towards content generated entirely by AI affects how the rest of the platforms that tend to follow in its footsteps will produce, distribute and monetize audiovisual entertainment. The context. iQiyi has been losing audience for years to Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok owned by ByteDance. Short video has cut into the time that Chinese users spend on long video platforms. The result is that its revenue has fallen by 13% in the first quarter of 2026. The company, listed on Nasdaq, has also applied for a second listing in Hong Kong seeking closer capital. The announcement of the pivot towards AI comes from a certain pressure. In detail. The center of the plan is Nadou Proa suite of AI tools that the company presented on April 20 and that, it says, can manage practically the entire film production process: script, storyboardvideo generation and final assembly. The software does not work with its own models, but rather integrates those of several direct competitors: Alibaba, ByteDance and Kuaishou for the domestic market; Seedance 2.0 and Google I Spy 3.1 for the international version. iQiyi has also launched a library of virtual assets and “signed” talent for third-party creators to generate new content using the platform’s characters and universes. The incentive strategy to attract these external creators involves… An extra 20% on advertising and subscription revenue for those who produce content with Nadou Pro. An inaugural catalog of 16 AI-generated films, in science fiction and anime. A public goal: release a commercially successful AI-generated film before the end of summer 2026. Yes, but. The question that remains to be seen is whether anyone will want to pay to see that. Recent history does not invite optimism. AI-generated video has shown some traction on TikTok and Instagram, where the cost of user attention is practically zero and the scroll Erase any disappointment in a tenth of a second. That this tolerance is transferred to a two-hour feature film for which someone pays a monthly subscription is another story. Between the lines. Gong Yu has said that iQiyi will continue investing in professional production, but in the same sentence he has clarified that this type of content will reduce its relative weight on the platform. The direction is quite clear. The risk is that viewers of C-dramas and the anime Koreans who have made iQiyi great are exactly the type of audience that has the least tolerance for ‘AI slop‘. Main loser? The producers and directors who filled that room in Beijing when Gong Yu announced the pivot. iQiyi has designed a system where independent creators can use Nadou Pro to generate content and earn a percentage of the advertising revenue. It’s the same model that YouTube has applied for years with human content, now transferred to AI. In this scheme, professionals in the sector go from being the protagonists of the production chain to being, in the best case, supervisors of a process that they no longer control. In Xataka | In China, 470 series made with AI are produced per day. 99.9% of them do not reach anyone Featured image | iQiyi, Xataka with Mockuuups Studio

His best gift has been having turned 5.5 billion euros into bricks

Amancio Ortega has just turned 90, but the tireless businessman he hasn’t slowed down. While the world speculated about whether the founder of Inditex would reduce his investment activity at that age, his team in Pontegadea closed one operation after another at breakneck speed. In the last year, Pontegadea completed 17 real estate purchases with a total investment that exceeds 5.5 billion euros. As and as detailed The Worldthe figure of rental income that Ortega receives through his real estate giant exceeded 977 million euros in 2024, and in 2025 they reached 1,089 million euros. The landlord of big companies. Although 2025 has been characterized by the diversification of investments, the brick remains the star product of Ortega’s investments. The most striking bet of 2025 was the purchase of eight office buildings in six cities spread across five countries, with a joint investment of 1.5 billion euros. Pontegadea’s investment recipe is simple in theory, but somewhat more complex to put into practice: always choose buildings of high strategic value located in the most important urban centers…and, if possible, that already have solvent tenants. The logic is undeniable, a “high-end” building is a highly valued value by hotel chainslarge companies that use them as headquarters or brands that use them for set up their flagships in the center of large cities around the world. In this way, they ensure receiving income from day one. The largest operation of 2025 in this sense was the acquisition of “The Post”, a historic Vancouver office building with Amazon as a tenant. The millionaire closed the purchase of that former Canadian post office for 1.1 billion Canadian dollars, which is equivalent to about 680 million euros. The rest of the office purchases were distributed throughout Europe, the US and other regions, consolidating a portfolio of buildings spread throughout the world. The great logistics bet. If Inditex has become the textile giant that it is today, it is not because of its contribution to fashion designbut for the development of its logistics network that allowed it to take any clothing line to any corner of the world in record time. This obsession with logistics comes from its founder, and in 2025 we have also seen it in Pontegadea. Ortega’s investment in the field of logistics it’s not new. It has been investing in logistics centers in Europe and the US for years, but in 2025 it has opted for another approach: ports. At the end of October 2025, the millionaire’s participation was announced with 49% of PD Ports sharesone of the most important port operators in the United Kingdom, in an operation valued at more than 500 million euros. At the beginning of 2026, it was confirmed that Pontegadea was continuing along this investment path with participation in a joint offer valued at 11.7 billion Australian dollars (approximately 6.9 billion euros) to take over 100% of the Australian manufacturing giant. Qube logistics., although the exact percentage corresponding to the Spanish millionaire has not been made public. Control of energy. Using the same philosophy that Pontegadea applies to real estate investments, Ortega consolidated his position in the companies that control the power distribution networks in Spain and Portugal. It increased its stake in REN, the Portuguese electricity and gas network operator, from 12% to 13.7%, which places it as the second largest shareholder behind the Chinese electricity company State Grid Corporation, which controls 25% of the group. He occupies a similar position in Redeia, the electricity grid operator in Spain, of which he controls 5% of its capital, being also the second largest shareholder only behind the 20% held by SEPI. The engine that moves everything: Inditex. Behind all this investment movement there is a constant generator of liquidity: Inditex. In the last five years, Zara has increased its value by 98% and has increased its dividend by 88%, which has meant an income of 14.6 billion euros for Ortega. only in dividends. That constant cash flow It has been what has allowed us to finance the most active year in decades for Pontegadea. The result of this financial activity has been reflected in the form of an increase of 4.9% in the fortune of Amancio Ortega during 2025. Although it is a notable increase, the fortune of the founder of Inditex grew less than that of other large Spanish assets such as Rafael del Pino (34%) or Juan Roig (13%). In Xataka | Amancio Ortega: the billionaire who lives like another neighbor. Except for private jets and superyachts Image | GTRES, Unsplash (Sergio Kian)

with a bridge built in record time

Satellite images reviewed by the BBC confirm that the first direct connecting highway between Moscow and Pyongyang will be operational in the coming weeks. That is to say, there will soon be a bridge that connects Russia and North Korea by road, materializing an alliance that is reconfiguring the conflict in Ukraine. What is happening. The Khasan-Tumangang Bridge, which crosses the Tumen River on the border between Russia and North Korea, is nearing completion. The satellite images that share The middle shows the structure already united in its central section, along with new access roads, a border control post, support infrastructure and parking areas. The Russian embassy in Pyongyang confirms that the planned opening date is June 19. First time in history. Until now, the only physical link between both countries was the so-called Friendship Bridge, a Soviet-era railway crossing inaugurated in 1959, and whose use for road vehicles was limited. The new bridge is, therefore, the first road link in history between Russia and North Korea. It measures approximately one kilometer in length, has two lanes and is built on concrete pillars with metal openings. It also runs parallel to the old railway bridge. Numbers. According to share In the middle, the crossing has been designed to support up to 300 vehicles and nearly 3,000 people a day. Its total cost exceeds 9 billion rubles, according to Russian state media, which is equivalent to about $120 million. Construction has been rapid, taking about a year, a pace that analysts consider strikingly fast. “The speed of construction reflects the volume of commercial activity between both parties,” said Victor Cha, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Where does this project come from? The agreement to build the bridge was reached during Vladimir Putin’s visit to Pyongyang in June 2024, when the Russian president met with Kim Jong Un. At that same meeting, both countries signed a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty that includes a mutual defense clause: if one of the two is attacked, the other is obliged to respond. The bridge, therefore, was born under the protection of that pact and has been built in record time. More than concrete. It is inevitably necessary to analyze its geopolitical context. According to data from South Korea, Pyongyang has sent around 15,000 soldiers to fight alongside Russian forces in Ukraine, in addition to long-range missiles and weapons. Seoul also estimates that some 2,000 North Korean soldiers have died in that conflict, although neither Moscow nor Pyongyang have confirmed these figures. In return, North Korea is believed to have received food, fuel and military technology from Russia. “This is an alliance largely driven by North Korean supply of troops, weapons, ammunition and manpower for Putin’s war in Ukraine,” explained Cha about it. What exactly will it be used for? Once open, the bridge will connect the Russian settlement of Khasan with the North Korean town of Tumangang and link directly to the Russian road network, reducing the distance between Vladivostok and the border town of Rason to 320 kilometers. Of course, Russian and North Korean drivers will be prohibited from driving their vehicles into the territory of the other country. In this way, the exchange of goods would take place at the border post itself, transferring the load from one truck to another. “This bridge will offer a very useful route to transfer military material and ammunition, both to North Korea and Russia,” counted Dr. Edward Howell, an expert on Korea at the University of Oxford, spoke to the media. The other side of the coin. Russian Foreign Ministry has described the opening of the bridge as “a truly historic stage in Russian-Korean relations” whose “significance goes far beyond a purely engineering task.” Moscow presents it as a symbol of cooperation in trade, economy and humanitarian relations. But for Western analysts, the reading is very different: a logistical artery designed to sustain a military alliance that transcends the war in Ukraine. “The construction of the bridge exemplifies how North Korea’s ties with Russia aim to continue beyond any end to the conflict in Ukraine,” pointed out Howell. China. It is not just Russia that is seeking to strengthen its physical connection with North Korea. China resumed last month the first passenger train service with Pyongyang after six years of interruption. North Korea, which for decades has been one of the most isolated corners of the planet, is being progressively integrated into the infrastructure networks of its two great allies. “It is fair to say that this connection, before the war in Ukraine, was one of the most dormant links between North Korea and its two neighbors,” Cha acknowledged. It seems that that lethargy has been left behind. In Xataka | While we were looking at gasoline, the Iran crisis has skyrocketed the price of asphalt. And the roads of half the world are already suffering from it

The biggest problem with living on the Moon is its nights. NASA believes it has found the solution to avoid running out of electricity

If we want to build bases on the Moon or on Mars, we must work on the development of technologies that make the lives of lunar colonists easier. For example, it is important to think about ways to obtain energy. In the case of Mars, there are already scientists working on methods to obtain electricity using carbon dioxide from your atmosphere. But the ideal would be to be able to use batteries. They would have to be rechargeable batteries, since there are no containers for batteries on the Moon (on Earth there are, throw them away where they belong). The problem is that lunar nights are very long, so solar energy cannot be used to obtain electricity to recharge them. Therefore, NASA scientists they are already working in rechargeable batteries that generate and store energy in a very original way. Only two ingredients. The battery in question, called a regenerative fuel cell, contains hydrogen and oxygen gases, which combine to give rise to water. In this reaction, heat and electricity are generated, which can be used to supply the devices necessary for astronauts’ daily lives. Once no more energy is needed, the water molecules break down, giving rise to hydrogen and oxygen, which are saved for when it is necessary to start again. Thus, the fuel is not wasted. It regenerates. Big as a human being. Let’s not think about small batteries like the ones we use at home. Not even in batteries like those in a car. This regenerative fuel cell is much larger. It is practically the height of a human being and the length of a sedan car. First tests. In 2025, the basic components were tested to verify that the previous design technology was viable. Right now NASA scientists are doing more advanced tests, with the aim of analyzing whether the fuel regenerates properly. In a test cell, the system can be operated remotely. Furthermore, once the test has started, it can continue autonomously, without intervention from the researchers. Learnings. Everything is expected to go well in the tests. But, in any case, there will be learnings that serve to perfect the device. After five years of development, the prototype has advanced a lot, but these types of experiments are what really help to perfect a technology of this caliber. Heading to the Moon. Once the tests are completed, the goal is to repeat them in an environment that simulates lunar conditions. Theoretically, the battery is designed to withstand the extreme temperatures of the Moon, even on its cold two-week Earth nights. If all goes well, the technology would be ready to be used. in the Artemis program. This is the objective with which this battery of 270 sensors and 1,000 components was designed. There will be time to think about Mars. At the moment, the closest target on the horizon is our satellite. We need energy to stay on its surface. Image | NASA/Magnific In Xataka | We have not yet colonized the Moon and we have already filled it with garbage: there are even abandoned golf balls

The first dual core and 200 qubits on the planet is now ready

The pulse between the US and China in the field of technology goes beyond semiconductors and the artificial intelligence (AI). The US leads the industry quantum computersand, although probably not all the achievements that Chinese companies and research centers have achieved have transcended, those that we know of reflect that China is also a power in quantum computing. In fact, these two countries have achieved notable milestones over the past few years. The quantum supremacy is one of those that share, but if we stick to quantum telecommunications China is intractable. In addition, the country led by Xi Jinping is one step away from having indigenous superconducting quantum computers. In recent years, Chinese companies and research centers have been forced to buy high-density microwave connectivity modules abroad, mainly in Japan. This dependency is about to come to an end, if it has not already done so. Be that as it may, the latest milestone for this Asian country has been signed by CAS Cold Atom Technology, a Chinese quantum technology company based in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province. And it has presented the world’s first quantum computer with neutral atoms and double core: the Hanyuan-2. We have known for a long time that China is very advanced in superconducting qubits, but now we also know that it is a competitive country in qubits of neutral atoms. Hanyuan-2 is a unique machine Neutral atom quantum computers are an alternative to quantum machines with superconducting qubits and ion traps, and are still in an experimental phase. Those responsible for the design of Hanyuan-2 have confirmed that this device incorporates two independent and complete arrays of qubits of neutral atoms. It integrates 100 atoms of rubidium-85 and another 100 of rubidium-87 to build a dual-core system that implements a total of 200 qubits. Each logical qubit is abstractly built on top of several physical or hardware qubits. Both matrices can work in parallel (hence this machine has 200 qubits) in order to increase its calculation capacity. However, and this is very interesting, one of them can operate as the main nucleus and the other can act as an auxiliary nucleus to build logical qubits. more stable and less sensitive to noise. An important note: logical qubits represent a way to overcome the difficulty involved in using hardware or physical qubits, which are extremely sensitive to noise, and therefore prone to making errors. Each logical qubit is abstractly built on several physical or hardware qubits, so that a single logical qubit encodes a single qubit of quantum information, but with redundancy. It is precisely this redundancy that allows us to detect and correct the errors that are present in physical qubits. Until very recently the number of hardware qubits needed to implement a single error-immune logical qubit made error correction infeasible in practice, but this limitation has been lifted thanks to the work of IBM and CAS Cold Atom Technology, among other companies. Although the quantum computer that you can see in the cover image of this article is the Hanyuan-1, its successor also has a conventional design. In fact, both look much more like a classical computer than a quantum machine with superconducting qubits or ion traps. What is truly striking about Hanyuan-2 is that does not need a cryogenic cooling environment to function. Instead, it uses a small laser cooling system with a total consumption of less than 7 kilowatts, which allows it to be installed in practically any space without extraordinary technical requirements. Image | CAS Cold Atom Technology More information | Global Times In Xataka | China has reached one of the holy grails of quantum physics. So says Peter Zoller, father of quantum computers

There are people very angry about the inaccuracies in Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’. But not because of the uniforms: because of the diversity

The most expensive and ambitious film of the summer of 2026, ‘The Odyssey’ by Christopher Nolanhas generated a controversy that already sounds old, but that the conservative factions of the Internet never tire of recovering again and again. The African-American Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy and, possibly, the trans actor Elliot Page as the Ghost of Achilles are two casting choices that have defenders of fidelity to the original text infuriated. Delivery and delivery. The first film of Nolan’s career shot entirely on 70mm IMAX cameras hits theaters on July 17. Nolan, very cleverly, announced his casting practically in full (Matt Damon is Odysseus, Anne Hathaway is Penelope, Tom Holland is Telemachus, Zendaya is Athena, Charlize Theron is Calypso, Jon Bernthal is Menelaus, Benny Safdie is Agamemnon and Robert Pattinson is Antinous) and left out two additions that he knew would make a certain part of the internet up in arms. Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy has been announced later, and Elliot Page as the Ghost of Achilles has not yet been officially confirmed. The rich cry too. The negative reaction came, in large part, from X, with Elon Musk as the main amplifier. The owner of the platform accused Nolan of having chosen these actors to satisfy the diversity quotas of the Hollywood Academy, summarizing his thesis with the phrase “He wants the awards“(He wants the prizes). Kevin Sorbo, known for playing Hercules in the 1990s television series (not exactly the best example of adapting classic myths faithful to the sources) joined the criticism. According to has been countedare recurring themes in Musk’s speech, who, for example, published content alluding to racial theories or anti-immigration conspiracies on 26 of the 31 days of January 2026. We have already seen it. We have seen this reaction on numerous occasions, always from the same sector of the public, and always criticizing casting choices to make it diverse. Disney has suffered it with the latest versions of ‘Snow White’ and ‘The Little Mermaid‘, he made a considerable mess with ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power‘ and his racialized elves. And the Star Wars universe has been enduring these criticisms since the premiere of ‘The Force Awakens’. Troy, bad example. The film that Musk and a good part of his followers invoke as a counterpoint is ‘Troy’, Wolfgang Petersen’s peplum starring Brad Pitt that was released in 2004. There were those who did direct comparisons between Petersen’s version and Nolan’s. But there are countless problems here. ‘Troy’ adapts ‘The Iliad’, not ‘The Odyssey’, and does so very loosely: Patroclus becomes Achilles’ cousin rather than his companion; Briseis kills Agamemnon, destroying the ‘Oresteia’ in the process; Andromache and Astyanax flee through a system of tunnels; compresses a ten-year war into a few weeks; and completely eliminates the Olympian gods. About the Oscars. The most widespread accusation is that Nolan is diversifying the cast to meet the Academy representation and inclusion standardsapproved in 2020 and effective from 2024. The reasoning seems solid at first glance. But the Academy system works differently: a film has to meet two of four possible standards. Standard A refers to the cast, but standards B, C and D cover the creative team, distributor training programs and the composition of the marketing teams. It is perfectly possible to meet the criteria with Caucasian actors. And there is one’s ownOppenheimer‘ (entirely white cast, seven Oscars including Best Picture and Best Director) to prove it. How did he get it? Its costume designer, production director, editor and makeup manager were women; Universal, the distributor, has scholarship programs and marketing managers from underrepresented groups, including a woman as president (Donna Langley) and a black man as head of domestic marketing (Dwight Caines). That accusation falls by itself. Nolan’s response. The director, without needing to mention Musk’s tears, alluded to the controversy in an interview. Nolan defended the historical rigor of the production (including the blackened Mycenaean bronze of the armor, which some users had compared to Batman’s suit) and justified the casting of rapper Travis Scott as an aedo with an argument of artistic coherence: he wanted to emphasize that ‘The Odyssey’ was transmitted as oral poetry, and that rap is the contemporary equivalent of that tradition. The intention, according to the director, is not that the public agrees with each decision, but rather that they do not think that the material has been taken lightly. In Xataka | “It’s not completely understood”: Christopher Nolan admits the harsh reality about ‘Tenet’ and proposes a solution

close the Bering Strait

We haven’t been talking about it for years without reason, the consequences of the end of the Gulf Stream would be catastrophic in much of the northern hemisphere and, above all, for Europe. For this reason, many scientists have stopped wondering if it is going to happen or not; and they have begun to wonder how we avoid it. And beyond the well-known emissions cut, the responses have sincerely been tremendous: from proposals to cool the Arctic or launch orbital sunshades into space to chartering planes to fertilize the ocean with millions and millions of tons of iron… But perhaps the last one is the one that takes the cake: some climatologists have started doing the math to see What would happen if we closed the Bering Strait. What is this about the Gulf Stream? Its technical name is ‘Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation’ and it is, in general terms, the North Atlantic branch of the thermohaline circulation. Since the sun does not heat the sea equally everywhere and freshwater flows reach the ocean at very specific points, this is the basic mechanism by which the oceans balance differences in temperature and salinity. The AMOC is a good example of this regulation. After all, as explained from AEMETit is an “Atlantic basin-scale north-south ocean flow that begins with cold sea water sinking to the bottom off Greenland, subsequently flowing south, and being replaced by warmer water flowing at the surface from the south, transferring heat from the tropics to the east coast of North America and the west coast of Europe.” And why do they want to build a dam in the Bering Strait? Well, strictly speaking, they don’t want to close the Bering Strait, they just picked up the idea of ​​a Soviet engineer from the 1950s and they have done calculations to see if this could help resolve the issue. It may seem somewhat counterintuitive, but the basic idea is that cutting off the flow of waters from the Pacific to the Arctic would favor the creation of deep waters (due to the difference in salinities). The calculations show that it makes sense. How does that make sense? Well, yes, it’s true. It makes partial sense. Here’s the interesting thing: As long as the AMOC can continue moving salt northward, the mechanism works and protects the climate of the Northern Hemisphere. On the other hand, if the AMOC is weakened, the closure of Bering would have the opposite effect. It would plunge us into an even more complex winter. Thank goodness it’s crazy, right? It is not very realistic, that is clear. But I’m not sure I’d say it’s crazy either. As the authors themselves acknowledge, there are already dams (such as the Saemangeum in Korea) that are 33 kilometers long: half of what would be required to close the strait. So is it something viable? Nobody says that. Not even the authors say so.. But it is something interesting in order to reflect on one of the great themes of the future: the increasingly imperative “need” of humanity to take the reins of control of the planet. Something that, in short, can cost us very dearly. Image | Fictional recreation In Xataka | The current that warms Europe will weaken by 51% before the end of the century. And Spain, according to experts, is already beginning to notice

You bought an electric car to save. Here’s why you’re not doing it

It’s 7:30 p.m. You get home, put away your coat, plug in the car and forget about it. You’ve done it like this every day since you bought the electric one. Until the electricity bill arrives and nothing adds up. The car doesn’t consume gasoline, yes, but something has gone wrong. That something has a name: you’ve been paying the most expensive electricity of the day to charge a battery that could have been filled for half the price while you were sleeping. It’s 7:30 p.m. You get home, put away your coat, plug in the car and forget about it. You’ve done it like this every day since you bought the electric one. Until the electricity bill arrives and nothing adds up. The car doesn’t consume gasoline, yes, but something has gone wrong. That something has a name: you’ve been paying the most expensive electricity of the day to charge a battery that could have been filled for half the price while you were sleeping. The 280 kWh error. Think of any family: apartment, refrigerator, washing machine, some heating. About 290 kWh per month. The day they park an electric car in the garage and start charging it at home, those 290 kWh become 570. The car adds about 280 kWh per month on its own, counting what is lost in the charging itself. If they plug it in in the middle of the afternoon, they are paying for that mass of energy at the most expensive price of the day. The same amount of kWh can cost twice as much depending only on the time at which it is consumed. The key is no longer just how much is consumed, but when it is consumed. The three traps. The first instinct when buying an electric car is to call the company and ask for more contracted power, for fear that the leads will trip if the car is connected with the washing machine running. Alejandro Diego Rosell, energy consultant and professoridentifies it as one of the most common and most expensive mistakes: oversizing the power means paying an unnecessary safety margin every month, even if you never use it. But the thing doesn’t stop there. Many users believe that the regulated market (PVPC) is the safest haven. According to Sergio Soto’s calculations, energy expert Roamsa model household with an electric car would pay about 101.67 euros per month in PVPC, penalized by hourly volatility and increases in prices in certain sections. Cheap when the price drops, yes. But unpredictable when it rises, and rises just when it is most consumed. And there remains the one that is most abundant in advertising and the one that deceives the most: EV rates. Rosell sums it up with a rule that should not be forgotten: “You are still saving 8 euros by charging the car and losing 15 in the rest of the house.” You have to look at the nightly price, but also what they charge during normal hours and what is in the fine print of the fixed term. Some EV rates offer a very cheap early morning to recover the margin the rest of the day. The name does not guarantee anything. The roadmap. For the electric car to be truly profitable, experts propose following these steps: Apply the exact power formula: Rosell proposes a simple account: Necessary power = simultaneous consumption of the house + charger power + safety margin. If at dawn you have a refrigerator, water heater and air heater consuming 1.5 kW and you charge the car at 3.7 kW, you need about 5.2 kW in total. With a safety margin, you would hire 5.75 kW, not 10. And there is a nuance that changes everything: a smart charger can automatically reduce the car’s power if it detects that the house is consuming more. The car waits. The leads don’t jump. Play two powers: Current legislation (2.0TD rates) allows contracting a lower power for the day and a higher power only for the night (valley). This way you don’t pay all day for a power that you only use while you sleep. Escape from commercial trends: Faced with the avalanche of so-called ‘EV Rates’ (specific for electric vehicles), Soto warns that the most economical option is usually a well-optimized classic rate with three-period time discrimination (DH3). In a practical case, this rate would lower the bill to 74.90 euros per month, representing a saving of 26.3% compared to the regulated market. EV rates are still competitive (about 77.50 euros), but they can be slightly more expensive than a good DH3. To compare without trusting advertising: the official comparator of the CNMC and the hourly prices of the PVPC published by Red Eléctrica in ESIOS are the reference tools. Install a smart charger. A conventional plug is slow and offers no control. A wallbox allows you to program the load so that it starts on its own during the cheapest hours and adjusts the energy so as not to exceed the contracted power. Rosell places the cost of the equipment between 400 and 800 euros; Soto, adding the complete installation, between 600 and 1,500 euros depending on the case. Important: the wallbox does not pay for itself only by the kWh saved, but also by the control, security and comfort it provides. And the investment is significantly cut with the Auto+ Plan, which subsidizes up to 70% of the installation for individuals and up to 80% in municipalities with less than 5,000 inhabitants. What if we collapse the network? With an increase in plug-in vehicle registrations which exceeds 44%it is legitimate to wonder if there will be blackouts when we all charge at dawn. Soto calls for calm: the problem is not that everyone charges at night, but that everyone does it at the same time and at high powers. With smart charging and distributed management, the grid holds up. Rosell adds something more important for the long term: the “eternal cheap night” is … Read more

Sony has launched the most anti-2026 high-end mobile. It’s an idea as good as it is risky.

Sony continues launching mobile phones. And it has reached a point where the news is not that it has launched a mobile phone, but rather why it has done so and what it wants to tell the market when it does so. Although it may seem like a counter-current idea, launching mobile phones knowing that you are only going to sell them makes some senseand Sony is not alone there. The anti2026. For some reason, manufacturers have been convincing us for years that more than useful technologies should disappear. All in pursuit of a more minimalist design, larger batteries and an evolution close to that of the portless mobile. To this, Sony responds with a blunt “hold my cap.” The Sony Xperia 1 VIII. He Sony Xperia 1 VIII It is a return to the past, maintaining technologies that the vast majority of its rivals discarded years ago. It has a 3.5mm headphone jack It has a slot for microSD cards up to 2 TB Thick, very thick bezels The SIM slot is not removed with the tool, just press it The stereo speakers are front-facing, there is no one below There is no trace of what might look like an iPhone Very good. Sony’s proposal is clear: in the middle of 2026 you can enjoy technologies that one day we banished and that are useful despite the passing of the years. Furthermore, each and every one of these steps does not distance the Xperia 1 VIII from what is required of a modern flagship. The best Qualcomm processor A powerful camera system with ZEISS optics Up to a generous 16 GB of RAM The only unforgivable point is that of a Full HD+ panel. On a 1,499 euro mobile phone this resolution is not acceptable. Because. The short answer is that Sony is not launching the Xperia 1 VIII to compete with Samsung or Apple. He gave up that battle a long time ago. In the last Corporate Strategy MeetingSony president Kenichiro Yoshida made it clear that the smartphone division does not exist to sell volume, it exists to prove something. Sony Xperia is, above all, a technological showcase. In addition, the Xperia division is a fundamental pillar for the company’s R&D. The advances made in these smartphones are later applied to what really matters: the brand’s cameras. In Xataka | At half price the Sony WH-1000XM5, headphones with one of the best noise cancellations we have tested

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.