Europe has proposed a 0% tariff for its cars. The only problem is that they have no cars to sell us

The United States has hit first and Europe tries to defend itself through negotiation. That is what indicates the first reaction of the European Union to tariffs of 25% imposed by the Donald Trump government to cars, the pieces that compose them, steel and aluminum. Also to the 20% tariff in flat rate format that the United States has imposed on all the countries of the European Union. The response of the European Union has been to put the table and sit down to negotiate. Europe plays the future of many sectors but the car is especially critical. According to UGTon average in Europe, 3.2% of each country’s employees work in the production of vehicles and engines or in activities associated with them such as repair or distribution and sale. The document mentions the Draghi reportthe result of a study commissioned by the European Union to which the European Central Bank was to seek solutions to the European economic decline against emerging powers. It pointed out that in Europe there are 13.8 million people working in the automobile sector, representing 6.1% of the active population. According to the European CommissionWe export vehicles to the United States worth 38.9 billion euros. Only the United Kingdom, who bought cars worth 34,300 million euros, rivals this country. To this we must add that a multitude of European vehicle manufacturers produce in Mexico or Canada as bridges to a cheaper entry in the United States. Vehicle shipments affect German manufacturers to a greater extent. The group Volkswagen is stopping his deliveries in the United States and its shipments on a railroad from Mexico. Mercedes is considering reduce your offereliminating smaller models and, therefore, that report lower profit margin. BMW, for the moment, It seems that it will absorb tariffs. And Stellantis too is sending home to workers from and outside the United States to produce a lower amount of cars. An impossible response proposal To try to save the situation, the European Union has put on the table operate with a zero tariff for vehicles and industrial goods. In The world collect the words of Ursula von der LeyenPresident of the European Commission, who recalled that the proposition on vehicles was already made last February. In the press conference to present the measure, from the European Commission it has been stressed that they did not obtain an adequate response. And the same has happened now. Yesterday afternoon, Donald Trump left the cameras to threaten China with raising tariffs even more and pointing out that the European proposal does not convince him. For the president of the United States, it is not enough. “The EU has been very hard over the years. I always say that it was formed to harm the United States in commerce. That is why it formed (…) joined to create a monopoly situation, to create a unified force against the United States in trade. (…) we pay to protect them militarily and play it in commerce. So it is not a good combination,” The country. The problem for Europe is that The commercial deficit of the United States with Europe in the purchase and sale of cars is very high and from the US government they are not willing to accept that Europe compensates for part of these losses (and other products sold to the United States) with services. In spite of everything, the balance remains positive for Europe, as is checked in this graph of eldiario.es. According to Acea15% of vehicles exported by Europe are destined for the United States. However, the value is high because 22% of the money obtained from exports worldwide comes from the United States. Those 38,500 million euros contrast with the 7.7 billion euros that we import from the country. By units, Europe sent 749,170 light cars to the United States while we bought 164,857 vehicles. On average, a car sold to the United States costs around 51,400 euros. Back, each car sold by the United States to Europe costs about 46,800 euros. This explains that if the United States only wants a balanced trade balance between vehicle entry and exit is almost impossible to meet. The only proposal that came out yesterday from North America is that Europeans buy the energy produced there to compensate for the commercial deficit that the United States has in the purchase of goods. But, in addition, there are many reasons why Europe cannot match in sales the purchases that the United States makes of our cars. First of all because of a purely cultural problem, the United States does not manufacture cars that fit with European philosophy. In general, they manufacture cars of extremely large dimensions for European cities, with larger engines and gastons than Europeans. And not only that, the United States has encountered the problem that much of the manufacturing automobile industry has left the country to place in Mexico and Canada. Commercial treaties with these countries allow them to sell cars “to the American” producing them cheaper than within their borders. However, Europe has been finding a productive market for each car. The highest cost (but greater profit margin) are manufactured, above all, in Germany and France where the costs are higher. The little ones occur in Spain or in countries with lax commercial treaties such as Morocco or Türkiye. Only within its borders (Germany and Poland) distortions such as the United States and Canada are produced. The problem for the United States is that Europeans do manufacture cars that interest there, sending them from Europe or from Mexico and Canada, but they already manufacture cars that interest the Europeans themselves. The United States manufactures a type of vehicle that is not demanded in Europe and, in fact, brands such as Ford have been manufacturing vehicles that interest us locally manufacturing on our ground as the Ford Fiesta has beenthe focus, the puma or the kuga, among many others. In fact, Ford itself is clear that the place to produce the few Ford … Read more

In their obsession with the US tariff

Wars do not understand names, and commercials much less. In that crazy Tariff race in which the United States seems to have signed up to all directions, it has been encountered, for example, with Diego García Island. The rate imposed is not surprising if it were not, in reality, an atolón that serves as a secret basis for … Washington. There is much more, because Trump has also imposed tariffs on islands that lack human population or, in the best case, to penguin communities. An unusual ad. It happened a few hours ago and you have hardly been able to escape the news: in the presentation of the Liberation Day RatePresident Donald Trump surprised the entire planet by including in his list of commercial sanctions to territories that lack significant economic activity or even stable population. In the Official White House List Virtually irrelevant enclaves appear in international trade that, however, will be subject to taxes of up to 50%, generating astonishment due to the lack of apparent economic criteria in their selection. In a ceremony at the White House, Trump showed a large poster that detailed alleged commercial barriers imposed on the United States, inexplicably including a list that we go on to detail. Heard Islands and McDonald. It is probably the first time that many hear about them. It has its logic. These remote islands are external territories of Australia located in the Indian Ocean, to more than 4,000 km of perthand known only for its glaciers, colonies of penguins and elephant seals. Cataloged as Unesco World Heritage, have been affected with a 10% tariff. The islands, described by CIA itself As a “desolate” territory and “covered in 80% per ice”, they do not register economic activity since 1877, when the extraction of marine elephant oil ceased and were abandoned by their only inhabitants, former seal hunters. Coconut Islands and Jan Mayen: Microterritories. Another Australian enclave included is the archipelago of The coconut islandsinhabited by about 600 people, whose exports (mainly ships) depend by 32% on the US market, and now face A 10% tariff. At the opposite end of the world, Norwegian island of Jan Mayena former shog station without permanent residents and with economy absolutely nilit has also been reached by the same tax, despite its commercial insignificance. In fact, Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has already expressed his bewilderment And concern by stating that “no place on earth is safe,” underlining the absurd nature of including territories without real productive capacity. Diego García Tokelu, Saint Pierre and surrealism. Of all the taxes announced, we are facing the More bleeding example. Tokelauan autonomous territory of New Zealand made up of three atolls and a population of 1,600 people, whose modest economy is 8 million dollars with exports of just $ 100,000, now they must pay 10% upon entering the United States. But the most drastic case is that of Saint Pierre and Miquelona tiny French territory near Newfoundland, one with just 5,000 inhabitants, whose exports of seafood and crustaceans now face A 50% tariffexceeding even 20% applied to the rest of France under the rules of the European Union. The example of Lesoto. For its part, Lesothoan African country without even exit to the sea and with an economy oriented to exports of diamonds, textiles and wool, will suffer a 50% tariffs about 20% Of their shipments that go to the United States, which represents a very hard blow for its fragile economy of 900 million dollars annually. The key to understanding the varapalo of these micro nations is How has calculated United States tariffs. It is not that the tariffs that these territories have over Washington, but of their commercial surplus with the United States. In this way, yes, let’s say that Lesoto sells it only and exclusively an African fruit to Washington, and does not buy anything (or almost nothing) back, the African country is a huge surplus over the United States, although it is obviously not to “take advantage” of them. Well, as tariffs have calculated them by dividing surpluses by total exports to the United States, they make a tremendous hole. Plot Twist: Allied bases. We said it at the beginning. The United States has even shot at the foot by adding tariffs to enclaves where they basically operate, in some cases, as in Diego Garcíawith Secret military basesor with relevant territories for American national security. For example, the British Indian Ocean Territorywhere joint military bases are located, shared by the United Kingdom and the United States, will face 10% tariffdespite the fact that their only population is … American military and contractors. The same happens with Marshall Islandsthat in addition to hosting the American base of Kwajalein For ballistic tests, they are under the formal defense of Washington through a free association agreement. Their exports, although they do not have the United States as the main destination, will also be subject to an additional 10%. Without clear economic criteria. In summary, the announced tariff pack seems to affect indiscriminately to Territories without weight In the commercial balance or even Without any economy. Far from focusing only on great powers, the measure reaches uninhabited islands, islets with penguins, own military bases and forgotten enclaves, generating confusion and questioning the logic behind the commercial strategy of the Trump administration. Plus: The real impact of these rates in some cases will be null, but in others, Like Saint Pierre and Miquelon Or the same Lesoto, could cause disproportionate consequences for extremely tiny or simply dependent economies. Image | Australian Antarctic Division, Wikimedia In Xataka | Trump tariffs have caused the Big Tech debacle in the stock market. And propose a slowdown in investment in AI In Xataka | The United States raises commercial tension with a new blow: it will impose 25% cars tariff made from the country

The US is leaving a huge vacuum in its tariff replication. And China is taking care of filling it

The measures that Donald Trump is taking are causing diverse consequences. The 25% tariffs for imports from Mexico and Canada that has just activated are a way to boost industry and employment in that country. Meanwhile, China is trying to take advantage of the moment to export more than ever, but there are many important elements in this commercial war. China is watering the world of exports. The Asian giant has been promoting trade agreements with countries around the world for years. The country’s ministry of trade shows it in its List of free trade agreementswhich includes countries such as Australia, South Korea, Switzerland or Chile. China already trades with almost everyone. There are agreements in negotiation with Norway, Israel or Panama, but new agreements with Colombia or Canada are also being investigated, precisely one of the great affected by the recent Trump tariffs. A well -known analyst, Balaji, He shared a graph in which the evolution of these agreements was appreciated from 2000 to 2024, when China has reached many more countries with its exports. But China needs to export. The problem is that China produces much more than it consumes, and that exports much more than matters. It occurs with steel, with cars or solar panels, and as indicated In CNN That drives her to increase her exports to revive her economy. And when it exports, it makes it benefiting that thanks to this overproduction it can compete in prices, throwing from the market to local businesses that cannot compete in that field. And consume much more. As we said, the imbalance between what is consumed and what is produced in China is remarkable. According to the World Bankin the world consumption represents 75% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but in China it only reaches 53-54%. That is due to various factors, as indicated In Carnegie Endowmentbut promoting that domestic consumption is really complicated, which makes exports even more critical. Care to import too much. If the countries that trade with China import too many merchandise and Chinese products, they are in danger of deindustrialized, as in fact it has happened in recent years in the West. We have delegated the production of technology to China, for example, and Trump’s measures are precisely aimed at recovering land in that market. The problem It also affects emerging economiesthat are flooded with Chinese products and without the ability to export their own. Example: the electric car. Byd has managed to become the Great protagonist of the electric cars segment in 2024, and has done so thanks to that strategy. Their cars are usually more assertible and that has managed to attract a large number of buyers. Compete with the Chinese electric car has become very difficult, so Europe Tariff appealed months ago To try to balance things. USA bet on the US. Trump’s measures are punishing imports And they are trying to get companies to manufacture there so that the country does not depend on those foreign products and materials. Recent ads Like those of TSMC either Apple They precisely try to avoid tariffs but force these companies to make strategic decisions that would probably not take. China’s exports to the US import, but not so much. The majority of China’s exports focus on other regions, and not so much on the US. In 2022 those regions They added About three billion dollars, compared to 637,000 million dedicated to the US. The business with that country is remarkable, yes (22% of the total), but not critical for Chinese exports that can be affected by tariffs. Canada (probably) will become more friend from China. The “punishment” tariff will affect trade between the US and countries such as Canada, but precisely this country has been increasing its trade quotas with China for years. Beijing has already shown his intention to reinforce those commercial ties with Canadaand Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, made clear the situation. When referring to Trump, he highlighted how what he is doing is something “very dumb. Two friends fighting is exactly what our opponents worldwide want to see.” Mexico also reacts. Claudia Sheinbaum, president in Mexico, also made it clear that “It is Mexico’s defense time“Faced with tariffs imposed by Trump. The president will reveal her plans soon, but she may also end up approaching the Chinese government as part of that response to Trump’s measures. Being a friend of China has its. That provision of China to reach commercial agreements with more and more countries is not exempt from problems, and in fact we have seen it with the example of European tariffs to the Chinese electric car. And meanwhile, collapse of the bags. Trump’s tariff policies have caused in recent days a collapse of the bags, and the great technological ones in the United States They have suffered especially that blow. Yesterday they managed to contain the losses a bit, but the falls have been significant in both traditional markets and in cryptodives. Image | Cage Skidmore | Paul Kagame In Xataka | ‘The Nvidia Way’: This book is the perfect tool to understand how Jensen Huang has taken Nvidia to the top of success

The United States has decided to start a tariff war. Videogames in physical format will pay Caro

Practically from his inauguration as president of the United States, Donald Trump launched a series of tariff measures that put many of the countries with which he maintained commercial relations. Very soon, the ESA (Entertainment Software Association)of which companies such as Xbox, PlayStation, Nintendo or Ubisoft are part of the evil, warned how bad these economic impositions can sit to the industry, mainly due to the conditions of globalization that the sector is experiencing. More tariffs, it is war. The Toma and Daca between countries that maintained a fluid commercial relationship with Trump has just begun, and we recently knew that if the US imposed 10% on Chinese productsthey responded with others in the opposite direction of 10 to 15% For American products such as coal, gas or oil. Similar answers They have given themselves after the announcement of the 25% tariffs for Canada and Mexico. ESA said it. The association warned In a statement that “tariffs on video game devices and related products would negatively affect hundreds of millions of Americans and damage the important contributions of the industry to the US economy.” And although analysts like David Gibson, from MST Financial said On Twitter that the tariff to China would have a “zero impact” on the price of the Nintendo Switch 2 In the United States, it also left the door open to the thing could change if tariffs like countries like Vietnam remained, very important for the manufacture of the console. The problem: physical games. The physical games market is increasingly a more residual part of the industry. But the thing could get worse. Analyst Daniel Ahmad He has highlighted that 20% of Chinese products would undoubtedly affect technological products such as consoles, mobiles and gpus (the latter It is already being noticed), while the 25% that Trump plans to carry Mexico would have an unsuspected effect: in the manufacture and consequent increasing discs, where the Latin American country has an important weight. Less and less. Mat Piscatella, another video game expert analyst, Replica these Ahmad predictions With an even more disastrous prediction: “I would not be surprised to see that the physical games subject to these rates simply did not get to do, with the editors addressing a completely digital strategy.” And concludes: “What a disaster.” At the moment, they are only conjectures, but analysts seem to coincide that tariffs could have an unwanted effect on precisely North American editors, which is what this policy tries to avoid. A future without physical format. Maybe this is the last lunge that awaits the physical games. The digital format gain ground Without rest, and the figures could not be clearer: in 2023 95% of the video games that were sold did so through digital roads. And decisions like Sony’s launch the PS5 Pro without disk unit (You have to buy separately) or Microsoft’s launch A new model Of Xbox Series S also without an album, they make it clear to which direction the industry is. Header | Álex Alcolea In Xataka | Nvidia lost 265,000 million dollars yesterday. Tariffs have caused terror among technology

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.