sued

A Moroccan sued a real estate agency for not showing him an apartment just because of his origin. Now they will have to pay 10,000 euros

by

The story sounded so strange, so much like an ‘improvised excuse’, that Hamid Hmata decided to do an experiment. In January 2024after seeing how the umpteenth real estate company closed the door on him after finding out about his Moroccan origin, Hamid asked a co-worker to help him out. His friend (with a Spanish name) called the same agency asking about an apartment in Mataró that Hamid had been interested in shortly before. He had no problem. They confirmed that the home was available, gave him information and scheduled an appointment. Shortly before, Hamid had been told the opposite, that it was already rented. The story could have stopped there, but what the agency probably did not take into account is that Hamid has been battling discrimination in access to housing for some time. Now that episode of 2024 has led to a pioneering sentence by “real estate racism”. a dozen complaints. The statistics They suggest that Hamid is not (far from it) the only immigrant who encounters obstacles or outright racism when looking for housing. His case is different in something: this man of Moroccan origin, father of two minor children and with the necessary income to pay for a rental house, has been denouncing real estate racism for some time. And he has also done so in an active way, calling out against various agencies and presenting a dozen complaints before the Mataró City Council. “For being a migrant”. His case was revealed ago just a month and a half the DESCA Observatory, one of the entities that has accompanied Hamid in his peculiar real estate crusade. At that time, the platform explained that the man had been looking for an apartment for four years, a long period during which he had dealt with “great difficulties.” The reason? Everything indicates that its origin. “Different real estate agencies, allegedly, would have covertly avoided providing him with their services (showing him the apartment, evaluating his candidacy, managing a contract, etc.) due to the fact that he was a migrant,” details DOWNLOAD From office to office. Despite his efforts, most of Hamid’s claims were unsuccessful. Their complaints to the City Council ended up being filed and they undertook a “bureaucratic journey” by different organizations, such as the Housing Agency of Catalonia, the Consumer Agency and finally the Office of Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination. Almost all of Hamid’s complaints ended up being dismissed, but last month DESCA recalled that there were still three live files: two “in the administrative procedure phase” and another “in the preliminary proceedings phase.” And the big surprise came. We have now known the next chapter in Hamid’s real estate odyssey. a few days ago DESCA revealed that the Office of Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination (OITND) of the Generalitat of Catalonia has imposed a fine of 10,001 euros on a real estate agency in Mataró for, the association claims, “a case of real estate racism in access to rentals.” The reason would have been the episode with which we started this article. Same floor, different answers. In 2024 Hamid was interested in an apartment for rent, so he contacted the real estate agency that owned it to visit it in person. He couldn’t. A day and a half after requesting the interview they told him that it was already leased. The explanation did not convince Hamid, who asked a colleague (in this case with a Spanish name) to call the agency to inquire about the home in question. Same agency, same apartment… different answer. Him, ensures DESCAYes, they made an appointment for him. Click on the image to go to the tweet. “True, but it has nothing to do with it.” Determined not to let the matter go, Hamid attended the visit scheduled by his friend to ask the head of the agency for explanations. Specifically, I wanted to know if the problem was that the owners of the apartment did not want to rent it to a person of Moroccan origin. “The administration admitted it: ‘That, that’s also true, but it has nothing to do with that. It’s reserved,’” reveals DESCA. The phrase is reminiscent of the one he received recently as well. another moroccanin this case from Irún, who was looking for a home. Mosqueado recorded the explanations of the head of an agency that had slammed the door: “The owner doesn’t want anyone from outside.” A figure: 10,001 euros. Hamid’s experience demonstrates several things. To begin with, proving an episode of “real estate racism” is not easy (he has denounced a dozen agencies). The second is that when it is detected it is expensive. DESCA explains that, in this case, the OITND has fined the agency a fine of 10,001 euros, although that is only part of the punishment. For one year you will not be able to receive any public aid or subsidies, nor establish contracts with the Generalitat Administration. “The OITND resolution recognizes that the reported facts consist of a case of discrimination in access to housing for ethnic-racial reasons and/or origin, which according to Law 19/200 on equality and non-discriminatory treatment is a serious infraction,” argues the observatory. The standard to which the platform refers clearly states in its section 14.3 that real estate agencies and their clients “must respect” equality and not discriminate. Why is it important? For several reasons. The first, the pioneering nature of the sanction. At least in Catalonia, where according to the RAC1 chain There is only one similar precedent. In 2022, Barcelona City Council revealed that the court had ratified a fine of 90,001 euros which he had recently imposed on “a real estate agent” for “excluding a group of people from access to housing due to their origin.” On that occasion the trigger was an advertisement for an apartment that only accepted Spanish tenants. The fine that the OITND has just imposed is interesting for another reason. There are studies that suggest that real estate racism is far from being a one-time phenomenon. In … Read more

Immediately afterwards, Intel and AMD ended up being sued

by

The inside of a missile says much more than it seems at first glance. Beyond its military function, it is also the result of a design, manufacturing and distribution chain that crosses borders. In several analyzes carried out in Ukrainetechnicians have identified foreign components integrated into Russian weapons. That information, by itself, does not explain how they got there, but it does open an investigation that begins in the technical field and ends up connecting with international trade and the courts. In this way, that clue is transferred to the judicial field. Several civil lawsuits were filed this week in Texas state court in Dallas on behalf of dozens of Ukrainian citizens against Intel, AMD and Texas Instruments, as well as Mouser Electronics, a large components distributor linked to Berkshire Hathaway. The plaintiffs maintain that these companies did not prevent restricted chips from being resold to Russia through third parties, despite the sanctions in force. The chosen location is not coincidental, since the aforementioned companies have an operational presence in that state. The accusation in a sentence. As Bloomberg reports, The lawsuits maintain that the companies incurred what lawyers describe as “willful ignorance”, a deliberate ignorance regarding the diversion of chips to Russia through foreseeable intermediaries. According to the plaintiffs, there were sufficient signs that components from these companies were being resold in violation of US sanctions, but they allege that controls were not strengthened to prevent this. That omission is the basis of a broader accusation of corporate negligence in export control and diversion prevention. So how do the chips arrive? The background of the litigation links to investigations that have long pointed to the presence of foreign technology in Russian weapons. Vladyslav Vlasiuk, Ukrainian presidential commissioner for sanctions policy, he explained to CNN in September that many of these components are dual-use and that their entry into military programs usually occurs through intermediaries and front companies. The demands are not based only on a general approach, but on specific episodes. The writings cite five attacks that occurred between 2023 and 2025 that killed or injured civilians in Ukraine. According to the documentation presented, one of those attacks would have involved Iranian-made drones, while others are attributed to KH-101 cruise missiles and Russian-produced Iskander ballistic missiles. In several cases, the plaintiffs claim that the systems used incorporated electronic components associated with the aforementioned companies. The focus of the lawsuits is not limited to the manufacturers. Named in court documents is Mouser Electronics, a large components distributor based in Mansfield, Texas, and owned by Berkshire Hathaway since 2007, when it acquired parent company TTI. The plaintiffs allege that Mouser facilitated chip transfers to shell companies controlled by intermediaries with ties to Russia, and that its logistics decisions and operations were a relevant domestic component of the alleged conduct. Mouser and Berkshire Hathaway also did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Position of the companies and sanctions. The companies mentioned have not made public comments on the matter. In the past, however, they have said that they comply with sanctions requirements, that they ceased their activity in Russia when the war began, and that they maintain strict policies to monitor compliance. Since the start of the war, the United States has tightened controls on the export of semiconductors and other electronic components, but the results have been mixed. a report of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations concluded last year that components manufactured in the United States continue to appear in Russian weapons. As we can see, sanctions and export controls do not seem to be preventing Western chips from ending up in the hands of companies linked to the Russian military complex. From now on, the course of the case will depend on when the court processes the lawsuits and they become publicly visible in the judicial record. From there, the judges will decide if the litigation moves forward and with what schedule. Beyond the result, the case focuses on a question that is difficult to resolve with simple rules, how far the responsibility goes when a component is resold over and over again and ends up in a prohibited end use, with human consequences far from its point of origin. Images | Vitaly V. Kuzmin (CC BY-SA 4.0) | Rubaitul Azad In Xataka | The US has joined the “party” of China, Russia and Japan in the Pacific: with its nuclear bombers

In 2016, a construction manager lost his 16,000 euro Rolex in a concrete pour. So he sued his company

by

The story of a construction manager in Parma (Italy) has hit the local media for having lost a luxurious watch Rolex Daytona valued at around 16,000 euros while working on one of the construction sites that he had to supervise as part of his job. As if it were not striking enough that a construction worker (no matter how much of a construction manager he was) I had a Rolexand took him as if nothing had happened to an environment as hostile as a work in progress, the employee decided to add a twist to the drama of the story: sue the company, accusing it of being responsible for the loss of the valuable watch. Two courts had to show him what seemed obvious. Luxury formwork In May 2016, the person in charge of a construction site in the Italian city of Parma carried out the usual prior verifications when pouring concrete necessary to build the foundation of a building. Apparently nothing out of the ordinary in the reality of thousands of works anywhere in the world, except for the detail that this employee wore a Rolex Daytona on his wrist. In one of these verifications, the person in charge detected that one of the pumps in charge of pumping the concrete into the intended hole was not working properly, which prompted him to take control himself at that precise moment and personally manipulate the nozzle of one of the machines to instruct his colleagues on how to pour it correctly. While holding a metal chain anchored to the end of the concrete mixer chute to control the direction in which the material should be poured, he waited for the staff to reactivate the pump. It was then that, when the spill resumed, something happened that triggered the loss. According to the witnesses called to testify in the trial: “Within minutes of resuming concrete pouring, while still holding the supply pipe as described, another sudden blockage occurred. Without giving him time to break free and move away, the pipe moved with a sudden and violent jerk, with such force that it lifted him off the ground and threw him several meters away.” After the incident, the construction manager composed himself and warned that his Rolex Daytona had disappeared from his wrist: everything indicated that the valuable Swiss watch had disappeared in the middle of the quick-setting concrete. At that same moment, exhaustive searches were launched, even within the mix, but the watch was never recovered. Outraged by the mishap, the employee blamed both the company and the machinery for the accident and filed a lawsuit requesting full compensation for the lost watch due to the malfunction of the concrete pumping system. According to collect The Italian newspaper Corriere di Bologna, in its statement, stated verbatim: “You owe me my Rolex Daytona for 16,000 euros; it is your fault and the machine’s fault.” Common sense two courts Italian justice was clear, and it was clear on two occasions: the responsibility fell on the construction manager for not being sufficiently cautious. After lose the lawsuit In the first instance, the construction manager submitted the first ruling to the Court of Appeal of Bologna, which determined – for the second time – that “it is seriously unsustainable that directing the trunk of a concrete mixer to direct the pouring of concrete on foundations under construction is an activity that can be carried out wearing a 16,000 euro watch”, as literally stated in the ruling signed by judges Rossi, Gaudioso and Mazze who formed the court. In their resolution, the magistrates concluded that the employee did not adopt the essential “expertise and diligence” measures, which made any claim against the company inadmissible. For this reason, the employee not only lost the valuable watch, but was also forced to pay an additional 2,500 euros in legal costs. The Rolex it cost him money even after losing it. In Xataka | Rolex is tired of theft and counterfeiting: they want to use NFT chips and blockchain-based certificates of authenticity Image | Rolex, Unsplash (Troy Mortier)

Some employees sued their company for cutting the salary. The supreme has responded that being unpunctual is not a job

by

The working day is much more than a simple time convention. From the labor reform of 2021, in which the SCHEDULE HOURS REGISTRATION As a method to measure Time really workedhas become a factor that conditions the salary that the employee must receive. Both when working More hours of the agreedlike when it doesn’t meet them. That is precisely what the Supreme Court had to remind them of the collective claim of a group of workers filed against their employer. If you do not meet your schedule and you are late, You will charge less. What happened? As you can read in The Supreme Court Judgmenta group of workers, represented by their union links, said that, due to the distance between the system of day registration And the employee’s job, every day they were counted between one and three minutes of delay, which was added monthly. The employees complained that, when doing the payrolls, the company discounted that time not worked on their salary, so they received less than agreed. What do employees claim? Workers recognize that Importuality It is a reason for sanction contemplated in the collective agreement of the company, but does not apply to salary reduction for that reason. Instead, it should be done through other types of warnings or compensation since the agreement is governed by a certain amount of annual hours, not for daily days. In this way, the company could ask employees to compensate for that time at any other time of the year, avoiding salary cut. Employees consider that, delays the delays of their salary, they would be imposing a double sanction and incurring a type of sanction called “Fine of having“, in which salary amounts are subtracted or sanctions on vacations or holidays are applied. A practice prohibited by article 58.3 of the Workers Statute. What does the Supreme Court say? The sentence of the High Court bases its argument to give the reason to the company in article 26.1 of the Statute of the Workers in which it is specified: “The totality of the economic perceptions of the workers, in money or in kind, for the professional benefit of the labor services in an alienation, and the effective work, whatever the form of remuneration, or the computable rest periods as a computable rest periods,” will be considered salary. The supreme considers that salary Back the work Cash or the computable rest time as work, while in article 30 of the Workers’ Statute it is established that “the worker will keep the right to his salary if he does not provide services for cause to the employer and not the worker.” Therefore, “during the time when the worker does not provide labor services, having an obligation to do so, without any justification, the sinalagmatic character of the employment contract assumes that salary is not accrued, without this implying a fine of having.” That is, since the unpunctuality was not produced for any reason attributable to the company, and the time of delay is not considered effective working timethe company is in its right not to pay it, without being considered as a sanction. Not that they don’t pay you, they can fire you. The Supreme Court specifies that the “fine of having” applies when it occurs in a salary cut or benefits to which the worker is entitled. However, in this case, “the worker has no right to receive said salary because he has not provided services for causes only to him,” the sentence abounds. In other words: the company does not have to pay for a job that the employee has not done and, therefore, cannot apply any penalty about something that does not correspond to it. In addition, the Supreme Court rules out the assumption of the double sanction since it has been shown that it is something that employees have no right because they have not provided the service that justifies it, although it indicates that “a contractual breach that, if reiterated, justifies the exercise of disciplinary power by the employer.” That is, that the company is not obliged to pay for the time that has not been worked, but can impose disciplinary measures on employees (and even cause with dismissal) by repeated breach of your contract without just cause. In Xataka | It seemed obvious, but the Supreme has had to remember: Ryanair cannot choose union, employees choose Image | Flickr (Kris Arnold), Unspash (MUSEMIND UX AGENCY)

A solar energy company has sued Google for the AI ​​of its search engine: it was invented that they were scammers

by

Google’s search engine is not just a search engine. Since Google began to integrate the “ai overViews” function, it is also A chatbot with artificial intelligence that answers the questions of the users without clicking on any link. The problem is that the underlying technology, the great language models, work probabilisticly, so they tend to invent the answer when they are not clear how to answer. A credible lie. This time, an invented response from AI Overviews can end up sitting Google on the bench. The plaintiff is Wolf River Electric, a Minnesota solar energy company. And the origin of the lawsuit is, the redundancy is worth, a demand that never existed. In Xataka Chatgpt is taking some people to the edge of madness. Reality is less alarmist and much more complex According to the lawyers of the energy company, the search for the terms “demands against Wolf River Electric” in Google made it AI responded with defamations. They cite a case in which AI Overviews replied that Wolf River Electric had been sued by Minnesota attorney for “deceptive sales practices”, such as lying to customers about how much they will save and deceive the owners to sign contracts with hidden rates. The AI ​​presented the case with total confidence involving four of the company’s managers by name: Justin Nielsen, Vladimir Marchenko, Luka Bozek and Jonathan Latcham, coming to show a photo of Nielsen next to the false accusations. To support his statements, the AI ​​cited four links: three news articles and a statement from the attorney general. However, none of the links mentioned a lawsuit against Wolf River Electric. It is not the first time. This type of error It is known as “hallucination”and it is very common in language models for how their response are weaving through the prediction of the following words, sometimes dragging the initial error until it becomes a credible lie with all kinds of invented ramifications, as in the play of the pickled phone. When Google began to integrate Ai Overview in the search engine, he had to withdraw it from some searches, especially recipes and nutrition, because he recommended Add glue to pizza Or eat a stone a day to stay healthy. An answer per question. Wolf River Electric states that, due to what they read in the AI ​​Overviews, several clients canceled their contracts, valued at up to $ 150,000. The problem is that Ai overViews responses are personalized: they are inferred at the time, so it can vary from one consultation to another That to Wolf River Electric’s lawyers are not worried because they know it can happen again. “This demand is not just about defending the reputation of our company; it will defend equity, truth and responsibility in the era of artificial intelligence,” Nicholas Kasprowicz sayslegal advisor of the company. {“Videid”: “X7ZW3C2”, “Autoplay”: False, “Title”: “I cheated an artificial intelligence | Captcha 2×02”, “Tag”: “Artificial Intelligence”, “Duration”: “2958”} David against Goliath. The case was filed in March in a state court and has just been elevated to a Federal Court of the United States. Perhaps it ends up creating jurisprudence on whether a technology company must take responsibility for its generation and disinformation. The answer to this question could mark a turning point for AI companies, which for a long time have tried to avoid responsibility for the results of their language models. Google, in its defense, described the incident as a harmless mishap. “The vast majority of our AI overViews are precise and useful, but as with any new technology, errors can occur,” A company spokesman says. Google says he had quickly acted to solve the problem as soon as they had knowledge of him, in line with his Recent efforts for allowing users to correct the mistakes of the AI. Image | Google In Xataka | Google’s AI advises using pizza cheese glue. The source is a Reddit comment 11 years ago (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news A solar energy company has sued Google for the AI ​​of its search engine: it was invented that they were scammers It was originally posted in Xataka by Matías S. Zavia .

He has given so many failures that he has sued the brand

by

Aston Martin has in its catalog one of the Few hyper -sports with which you can quietly walk its 1,155 hp through the low -emission areas of the country Thanks to the Eco Tag which provides you with an electric motor. Such and as they comment in Motorpasionthe nuance is that it is a car that costs more than three million euros, so for most mortals and motor lovers it becomes an unattainable dream. For some who could pay their price, the dream has become a nightmare that was about to cost his life. A jewel with surprise According to published The German newspaper Handelsblatta wealthy German motor fan paid three million euros in 2022 for one of the 150 units of Aston Martin Valkyrie that the British firm manufactured. In the words of its owner, and after traveling only 441 kilometers with him “I’m fed up with Aston Martin.” The problems of this owner with the Valkyrie began from the first kilometers, when a Electrical failure notice. It is not the first time that this model records that ruling that, in fact, has been plagued by technical problems since even Before putting on sale. In case the fault of a newly released car It was little misfortunethe car suffered damage during transport to the workshop that was going to check that breakdown. Once repaired, the car returned to a failure in the Rocket Locker system, which is responsible for maintaining the constant pressure in the hydraulic system of the suspension of the car, preventing it from sinking when it remains inactive for a long time. The user affirms that the system failed and the car simply sank Staying without suspension. Again, the user had no choice but to regret the three million that the car had cost him, ensuring that Valkyrie had more defects “than all my other cars together.” The drop that filled the glass and almost ends with his life However, the final ruling arrived in 2024, when the owner was about to be rammed by an ambulance that it was at full speed and with the lit mermaids: the noise that the huge engine generates its 6.5 -liter atmospheric engine developed by Cosworth inside the cabin prevented him Hear the siren of the ambulance. As the owner of the Valkyrie reported, “only thanks to the rapid reaction and skill at the wheel of the ambulance driver a fatal accident was avoided.” The acoustic insulation system of the Aston Martin Hyperdeportivo It is practically non -existent, so the manufactured has devised a system of headphones that connect with external microphones. These headphones do the double function of isolate from rumble of the 12 -cylinder monster that is installed after the granting, and reproduces the sounds that capture the external microphones. The system simply did not work and the owner of the Valkyrie did not warn the presence of the ambulance until literally had it. Given such a succession of failures, Aston Martin’s refusal to recognize them as such and try to put a solution, the millionaire chose to sue the brand and request the revocation of the purchase, so that the brand owed Buy the car again. Given the request of the owner’s lawyer, the brand just claimed that the Valkyrie are very complex vehicles that require special service and a very careful handling, indicating that it had been delivered as an “impeccable vehicle.” From Aston Martin they indicated that, in the event that the owner could return the car, he was They would be discounted about 64,000 euros as compensation for the 441 km he had traveled. That is about 145 euros for each kilometer traveled. Legal jurisdiction problems The last problem that the owner of the Valkyrie has encountered is not mechanical, but administrative. His lawyer has initiated his legal claim by filing a lawsuit in a Aquothers Court, in Germany. However, from Aston Martin they claim that the correct form is to do it through a court in the United Kingdom, since it was in that country where the purchase was made and one of the Purchase contract clauses. The owner’s lawyer, on the other hand, argues that as a private European consumer, the consumption regulations allow him to pursue the demand in his place of residence, regardless of the country in which the purchase of the car was made. At the moment, and after almost Three years chaining technical failuresthe hypercoche dreamed by many continues to parked in the garage of its owner that does not conduct it from its incident with the ambulance. You have to be careful what you want. In Xataka | 35% of Monaco’s inhabitants are millionaires. The car of its car is a Porsche 911 race of 150,000 euros Image | Aston Martin

He has also sued the European Commission for tariffs, according to Politico

by

Elon Musk star in a confrontation with the European Commission (CE). On this occasion, the conflict does not revolve around alleged breach of the Digital Services Law (DSA) with Xbut the focus is on tariffs affecting the electric car. Political points out that Tesla has filed a lawsuit against the executive arm of the community block before the Court of Justice of the European Union (TJUE). The automotive company adds, in this way, to the legal actions initiated by the Chinese giants Byd, Saic and Geely against the commission. The American renowned explains that the demands aim to leave without effect Compensation rights, that entered into force in October last year. If the ruling is favorable for the plaintiffs, they could initiate a loss claim. Tesla’s case against the EU It should be noted that Tesla has not made comments about it. The information comes from two sources from the demanding sector, which have preferred to remain anonymous. Politic adds that the commission has approximately two months to prepare your strategy of defense against the multiple cases presented in Luxembourg in recent months. Although there have been no reactions on the demand for Tesla, the Commission has issued public comments regarding the demand of Chinese manufacturers. Olof Gill, spokesman for Economic Security, Commerce and Financial Services, said they were prepared to respond to attempts to challenge the courts, making it clear that they have no intention of yielding to the pressures. As we have indicated above, the good course of the case could allow the plaintiffs to request compensation for the money paid in compensatory rights. Now, Tesla has been The least affected manufacturer. The American company has production plants in different parts of the world, although Model 3 that are marketed in the European market come from the Shanghai gigafactoría. MG4 Electric Tesla, who actively collaborated in the anti -subvent research of the community block, received a 7.8%”tariff”, the lowest among all manufacturers. Byd’s was 17%, Geely’s of 18.8%and SAIC’s reached 35.3%. In all cases, these compensatory rights are added to the 10% rate that the EU already applies to the importation of vehicles, a lien that has been in force. Unlike Tesla, which has the Berlin gigafactoría To manufacture the Model and And batteries, Byd still has no factories in Europe, although it is already planned to open one in Hungary. For its part, Saic, that Markets MG cars like him MG4 ElectricNor produces vehicles inside the EU. Instead, Geely, who acquired Volvo in 2010, does have production lines in Sweden and Belgium. Manufacturers that produce electric vehicles inside the EU can dodge tariffs. However, as we have pointed out, none of the Chinese companies affected by this anti -subvention measure manufactures vehicles in European territory. Now it’s time to wait to see what effect the demands will have. They may not achieve an absolute victory, but they could negotiate better tariff conditions. Images | Alexey Larionov | Tesla In Xataka | The Renault 5 has entered as a sales missile in France but something very simple has stopped it: a bug that prevents moving the car

Gloria Trevi sued Karla de la Cuesta for unauthorized use of her image

by

Gloria Trevi and Karla de la Cuesta are involved in a new dispute. The reason? The singer of “Everyone looks at me” sued the lecturer for the unauthorized exploitation of her image in the book Everything in the light. The criminal case that Mexico left in the dark According to the Mexican newspaper The Universal, This week the singer’s legal team released a statement in which they reported on the lawsuit filed by the singer before the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). “It is reported that today, The Mexican Institute of Industrial Property, notified a lawsuit to Karla de la Cuesta, for the unauthorized exploitation of the image of Mrs. Gloria Trevibecause in the book entitled ‘Everything in the Light’, her own image was used, without due authorization and for profit,” the singer’s statement states. The singer’s lawyers clarified that their intention is not to censor the content of the book, Your claim is about the commercial benefit derived from your image. “The lawsuit is not making any claim regarding the content of the book, but rather only the unauthorized use of the image of Mrs. Gloria Treviand consequently, any news that seeks to establish an alleged censorship against the book is totally false,” the statement indicates. Everything in the light. The criminal case that Mexico left in the dark It was published in August 2024 and collects testimony by Karla de la Cuesta, author of the book, and 11 other women about the abuses they suffered during the time they were part of the so-called “Trevi-Andrade Clan”. Until now, The author has not commented on Gloria Trevi’s lawsuit. He only shared a series of images that evidenced the notification of the extensive document, according to Infobae. Continue reading: · Will Paty Chapoy go to trial for defaming Gloria Trevi?· This is how Gloria Trevi celebrated her son’s birthday· Gloria Trevi countersues Sergio Andrade for sexual abuse

The 22 states that sued the Trump administration over the executive order that wants to eliminate the right to birthright citizenship

by

Image source, Reuters Item information Author, Drafting Author’s title, BBC News World 5 hours It is the first appeal in what will likely be a long legal fight over the immigration policy of the new Donald Trump administration. Attorneys general from 22 U.S. states filed lawsuits to block the executive order, signed by the president shortly after his inauguration on Monday, to end birthright citizenship. This is a centuries-old immigration practice that derives from the 14th amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees that children born in the United States will be citizens regardless of the immigration status of their parents. Trump’s order, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” stipulates that the administration will no longer recognize automatic citizenship for children born on American soil to immigrant parents who are in the country illegally, as long as when neither parent is a US citizen or legal permanent resident. In his first term, Trump threatened to take similar measures, but did not carry them out. “It violates constitutional rights” The first lawsuit, filed in Massachusetts by a coalition of 18 states including New Jersey, New York and California, alleges that Trump’s executive order violates the constitutional rights of thousands of children. He adds that this “imposes undue costs” on local jurisdictions that would lose federal funding linked to children’s health insurance. Image source, EPA photo caption, Democratic attorneys general say Trump’s executive order violates the constitutional rights of thousands of children. The lawsuit accuses Trump of attempting to eliminate a “long-standing and well-established constitutional principle.” “The president has no authority to rewrite or repeal a constitutional amendment or a duly enacted law. Nor is he empowered by any other source of law to limit who receives U.S. citizenship at birth,” the lawsuit states. The District of Columbia and the city of San Francisco also joined this lawsuit. Another group of four states – Arizona, Oregon, Illinois and Washington – filed a separate lawsuit in Seattle. Several civil rights and legal organizations also filed legal challenges in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, “on behalf of parents whose children would be ineligible for citizenship” under Trump’s executive order. Democratic attorneys general and immigrant rights advocates say the issue of birthright citizenship is settled law and that while presidents have broad authority, they are “not kings.” “For more than 150 years, our country has followed the same basic rule: Babies born in this country are American citizens,” New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin said at a news conference Tuesday. “(Trump) has the right to enact policy that he believes is right for the country,” but “this is an extreme and unprecedented act,” Platkin said. “This is not just an attack on the law. It is an attack on the very essence of this nation.” “The presidents of this country have vast power. But they are not kings,” Platkin said. He added: “The president cannot, with the stroke of a pen, erase the 14th Amendment from existence. Period.” For her part, New York Attorney General Letitia James said that Trump’s measure “is not only unconstitutional, it is deeply dangerous.” Long legal battle Image source, Getty Images photo caption, Legal scholars point out that Trump cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order. The series of legal challenges indicates that Trump’s effort will likely face a lengthy legal battle and could be stalled in court, preventing it from taking effect next month as planned. Most legal scholars agree that the president cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order. “He is doing something that is going to upset a lot of people, but ultimately this will be decided by the courts,” Saikrishna Prakash, a constitutional expert and professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, told the BBC. “This is not something he can decide on his own.” But the White House has indicated it is ready to take on the states in court, calling the lawsuits “nothing more than an extension of the left’s resistance.” “Radical leftists can choose to swim against the tide and reject the overwhelming will of the people, or they can join in and work with President Trump,” said White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields. Subscribe here to our new newsletter to receive a selection of our best content of the week every Friday. And remember that you can receive notifications in our app. Download the latest version and activate them.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.