Spotify

There are people listening to Drake on Spotify 23 hours a day. Or maybe they are not human and it is a ‘royalty’ fraud

by

That Spotify pays artists quite poorly It’s no secret, but now they are being accused of something else: there are artists inflating their reproductions in order to reduce the payment for the rest since the distribution is proportional. The demand. They count in Ars Technica which is a class action lawsuit proposed by American rapper RBX. In it, the platform is accused of having allowed Drake to inflate his views. Currently, the rapper holds the record on the platform with 120,000 million views. Although Drake is at the center of the lawsuit, he goes further and claims that Spotify ignores “millions of fraudulent streams.” The signs. According to RBX, Spotify ignored at least 37 billion inauthentic streams of Drake’s music over the past three and a half years. To do this, they have analyzed listening patterns and have detected strange behaviors such as “months of significant increases” without the release of new music to explain those peaks. But the most suspicious of all is that certain accounts only played Drake’s music for 23 hours a day, something they consider “astonishing and irregular” and why Spotify had detected it. The payment system. Spotify does not pay artists for each play, but instead uses a proportional model. Every month a “pool” of money is created and each artist receives a proportional share based on the reproductions they have had in that period. Thus, if one month the sum amounts to 1 million euros, an artist who has achieved 1% of the total reproductions would take home 10,000 euros. It affects everyone. With the proportional system, if one artist inflates his figures, it negatively affects all the other artists competing for a piece of the pie. Although they have not given details of how they arrived at that figure, the lawsuit speaks of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” If the judge accepts the case, it could cover more than 100,000 copyright owners who use the platform. It’s not something new. Years ago we talked about the techniques to manipulate the charts on the platform. The most famous case was that of Justin Bieber, who In 2020 he asked his followers to loop his song ‘Yummy’ to take it to number one on the charts. But the normal thing is that it is done undercover, using fake accounts hidden under a VPN that hides the real location. In statements to Rolling Stonea Spotify representative has denied benefiting from fake plays and claims to invest in systems to protect artists and eliminate fake plays. Image | Wikipedia, Pexels In Xataka | The problem is no longer that Spotify has been filled with AI artists: it is that AI is “reviving” dead musicians

How to activate spotify Hifi and configure loss -free quality

by

Let’s explain How to configure losses without losses in spotifyso that you can make the most Spotify Hifi. This service is already beginning to be available in Spain, and if you are a premium user of the service you will soon begin to receive the notification that warns you. Remember that the quality of Spotify Hifi is the so -called improved CD quality or Lossless. Is 24-bit/48 kHz compared to 16-bit/44.1 kHz, although It is a lower quality to the hi-re lossless offered by others competition services. Even so, for most users it should be more than enough. It should also be remembered that You will not enjoy the HIFI if you use bluetooth headphonessince this technology is not able to transport the amount of data offered by this audio quality. You will need a device compatible with spotify Connect or quality headphones and wired connection, and even in many cases it will cost to notice the difference. How to activate and configure Spotify Hifi To configure spotify Hifi at any timeyou have to enter the application configuration, either on the mobile or desk. Click on your profile image to see the options, and in them click on Configuration. Once inside, click on the option Multimedia content quality That will appear inside. This will take you to options where you have three adjustments where you can configure the lossless audio as sound quality. You will be able to do it when playing music with Wifi, when playing music with your data rate, and when you download music. Keep in mind that the sound quality is almost 10 times better than until now, which means that the songs music files are also almost ten times larger. My recommendation is that you consider not using the HIFI with your data rate. First for data spending, but also because surely when you leave home you listen to music through Bluetooth, and because even if you do not do it, between external noise and others you can not perceive the difference so much. Therefore, I recommend activating this quality for when you play music with the WiFi, because you will not spend so many data. AND Also in downloadsalthough if you are going to do it, I recommend that you disable the option to download songs using the data rate, to only be able to do it with WiFi. In the Apra Desktop application everything is exactly the same, only that you only have to Configure the section of Audio quality. Here, you can open the options of Streaming quality and Dischargeand in them choose the option of Loss without loss. But When you activate spotify HIFI for the first time Everything will be easier, because you will appear a full -screen message warning you. And then you just have to press on the button Access quality without lossand advance until reaching the sound quality configuration of the service. In Xataka Basics | 14 apps and services to discover new music in Spotify, Apple Music and other streaming services

Spotify is dealing with an avalanche of songs made with AI. So you have decided to react to mark the limits

by

You open Spotify, you run with a song that you cannot stop listening and, nevertheless, the name of the “artist” sounds at all. You wonder if there is a band behind or if it is a Track generated by AIand the doubt is not trivial: the trained ear may detect it, but for millions of listeners the border has become blurred. With generators like Suno either You raising their creation quality, catalogs are filled and the context matters. This week, Spotify announced New policies to stop three fronts: “Slop”, impersonations and transparency on the use of AI. The company states that it wants to protect artists and prevent the public from feeling deceived, without prohibiting responsible use of these tools. In just a few months, music generators have become accessible tools capable of producing thousands of subjects ready to be uploaded to streaming platforms. We do not talk about master compositions, but about songs that meet the minimum to sneak into mass catalogs. The result is an avalanche that makes it difficult to distinguish between genuine proposals and simple algorithmic exercises. For stamps and artists, this saturation not only generates confusion among listeners, it also threatens to dilute income in a system where each reproduction counts to distribute royalties. Spotify’s plan against music made with AI Spotify frames its new rules in a simple idea: music has always been crossed by technology, from the multipist tapes to auto-tune. The current difference is that artificial intelligence evolves at a speed that generates uncertainty. In this scenario, the platform states that it wants to reinforce transparency and shield the confidence of listeners, while respecting the freedom of artists to decide how to incorporate these tools into their creative process. One of the most sensitive spotlights for Spotify is the impersonation of identity. The company has hardened its rules and clarifies that it will not allow songs that reproduce the voice of an artist without its explicit authorization. This includes voice clones generated with artificial intelligence, “Deepfakes” and any unauthorized vocal replica. In addition, new measures are tested with distributors to prevent music from foreign profiles, an increasingly common attack. The objective is that musicians can denounce quickly and maintain control over their own artistic identity. Another front that the platform wants to stop is spam. Spotify explains that some users try to manipulate the system by uploading songs of just 30 seconds to accumulate reproductions with Right to paymentor repeating the same theme with minimal changes in metadata. To combat it, in the coming months will deploy a filter that will identify this type of practices and stop recommending them. The company ensures that the measure is necessary to protect the distribution of royalties and remember that in the last 12 months it eliminated 75 million fraudulent tracks. The third leg of the plan is transparency. Spotify collaborates with DDEX, the agency responsible for setting standards in the music industry, to create a metadata system that reflects the role of AI in each song. The objective is that the credits indicate if artificial intelligence has been used in the voice, in the instruments or in the production, so that the listener knows clearly. As reported by the company, 15 seals and distributors have already promised to adopt this standard, although for now there is no release date. The real impact of the new rules will be measured over time. For artists, reinforcement against impersonation and spam can translate into a fairer environment to compete for attention and royalties. For listeners, promise is a clearer experiencewith credits that allow distinguishing which part of a song has been generated by Ia. Even so, there is uncertainty about its scope: from the possibility of errors in automatic detection to the difficulty that stamps and distributors adapt their processes quickly and homogeneously. Spotify will probably continue working after this announcement. The effectiveness of the filters and the adoption of the new credits will depend on the industry as a whole move in the same direction. AI will continue to evolve and new methods are likely to make control systems. In that scenario, the company will have to demonstrate that its measures not only slow the abuses, but also help maintain the confidence of the listeners and the value of artists’ work. Images | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 | @felirbe In Xataka | OpenAi wants to bill as much as Microsoft in five years. For this

There are users selling their Wrapped data to train AI models. Spotify has not taken it well

by

Did you ever think you could make money with your Spotify data? What for many is only an annual summary with favorite songs and artists, for others it is a source of real value. An increasing group of users has decided sell your listening history To train artificial intelligence models. Spotify, which has turned Wrapped In one of its most recognizable brands, it has not taken long to react and the tension is served. Wrapped was born in 2015 as a tool to visualize listening habits and became a global tradition. Today, its popularity has given rise to UNWRappeda collective managed by the decentralized platform Vain. More than 18,000 users have grouped their data to sell them to interested companies. According to Ars Technicain June they achieved their first sale: a portion of data for $ 55,000 to only AI, with an average payment of about five dollars in cryptocurrencies for each participant. Wrapped is no longer just marketing: it is the center of a data control fight The interest in these data is not accidental: Spotify collects a detailed history of each account, searches, devices, approximate locations and technical records. All of that is available to any user through a Official download option, which offers packages in JSON format with years of history and precise data on the use of the platform. But although access is legal, its use has clear limits in the terms of Spotify. The policy for developers It prohibits using Spotify data or contents to train artificial intelligence models, resell information or replicate essential functions of the platform without permission. Spotify confirmed to the aforementioned medium that he sent a letter to those responsible for UNWRAPPed warning that the project could violate its registered trademark and violate these policies. The company insists that users can download their data, but does not authorize that they are monetic through third parties. UNWRAPPED pagethat until recently allowed to register and sell data, is no longer available. At the time of publishing this article, an English message appears that we have translated: “This service is no longer available. We regret the inconvenience. If you have any questions, get in touch with support. ”It is not clear if the closure responds to Spotify actions or a decision of the developers, who have not given explanations about this. Unwrapped was born, according to its creators, so that users had more control over their data, although their future is uncertain. Vana, the platform that drives it, argues that the project allows to group information in a community and collectively bargain its use. They explain that it is unlikely that a user manages to sell their data separately: companies are looking for broad sets, such as those who create vain, and then distribute the income among those who participate. Wrapped continues to be for most users a curious and shared annual summary. But the interest in monetizing this data makes it clear that the discussion about who controls personal information is not yet resolved. Spotify has expressed reservations on projects that use their services out of what is allowed, while decentralized proposals try to gain relevance. It is about to see what will happen finally with this project and others of similar characteristics. Images | Spotify | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 In Xataka | Google has resolved the dilemma of the age on the Internet as disturbing possible: spying on to protect you

is that they also do it in cinemas and spotify

by

When a few weeks ago We talked about the initial success of ‘The K-Pop Warriors’ We already pointed to how its original support was transcending, the movie released directly on Netflix. However, the days have passed and we can talk about phenomenon with all the letters: ‘The K-Pop warriors’ is not only one of the successes of the year in Netflix, but one that has entered land that Netflix possibly did not weigh in its first calculations: cinema and music. K-POP Cantajuegos. The film, which tells the clash between the K-Pop Hent/X band (actually, incognito demon jackets) and a rival boyband, the Saja Boys (five infernal creatures with Machiavellians intentions), has had a fleet Cante, a vitaminated karaoke format that is living in great acceptance thanks to premieres like ‘Wicked!’ Well, although there are no official figures because Netflix does not give collection data, Comscore talks about weekend figures around 17-18 million dollars in 1.7000 rooms. The experiment has gone so well that Netflix has released this Sing-Along version this week on the platform, titled in Spain ‘Sing with the K-pop warriors‘. Return to cinemas. With this limited but very noticeable success, Netflix returns to the rooms in style. It has had to dodge the refusal of AMC Theatres, the main American room chain, which does not project films that can be seen in streamingbut the following chains in importance (Regal, Cinemark and Alamo Drafthouse) have projected it without rechistar. Although Netflix seemed to have resigned from the signs of his successesleaving behind the times in which he tried to conquer the Hollywood awards And see them at the box office with the successes of the industry, this little caramel has not come bad for the platform or for the rooms themselves, which are not having a summer especially lucid. Record success. But cinema and streaming are communicating vessels that share successes, trends and stars. More strange and worthy of celebration is the impact of ‘The K-Pop Warriors’ on the lists of record successes, although on the other hand it has a very clear explanation: the resultona and infectious soundtrack of the film is composed and played by musicians of Theblacklabel (like Ejae, which gives life to one of the protagonists, but has co-composed a good part of the soundtrack), seal of the experienced producer of the genus. Park. Revolution on lists. As Producer Ian Eisendrath for Billboardthe secret has been in “Bring people from the pop world to write for the film, instead of people from the world of cinema who write in the style of K-Pop.” Result: milestones such as the “false” Saja Boys and Hent/X groups becoming the most listened to K-Pop bands in Spotify history in the United States, exceeding monsters like BTS or Blackpin. Or the landing of no less than Four songs on the top 10 of the best -selling albumsfirst time in the story that happens with a soundtrack. To get an idea of ​​the size of success, the last time a movie did something comparable, with three songs in the top simultaneously, it was with ‘Saturday night fever’ in 1978. The secret of his success. The film, despite the exclusive premiere on the platform, is produced by Sony Pictures Entertainment, one of the most interesting animation film factories of the moment: His style manages to distance from mainstream Pixar or Disney Absolute With equally affordable approaches for all audiences, but also attractive to adult spectators thanks to sophisticated aesthetics and good doses of irony, as already seen in franchises such as ‘Rain of meatballs’, ‘Hotel Transylvania’ or, above all, the movies of the movies of the Spider-Man Spider-Verso. This formula has been applied with the same expertise in this ‘The K-Pop Warriors’ that is not only captivating a children’s audiencebut also sweeps between a more youthful fandom, the one who generates fanfics or discuss your favorite films on social networks. Header | Netflix In Xataka | Many young people see and hear everything at 1.5x. They have not come there by chance: there was a lot of money at stake

How to share on Instagram what you are listening to Spotify in real time and at all times

by

Let’s explain How to share on Instagram what you are listening to in Spotify At all times, and always in real time. It is a new option that has implemented the application of musical streaming, and that makes use of the Instagram notes system. The idea is that when you enter the Instagram messaging section and above all in the row of notes you can see what others are listening, and that they can see what you listen. This is a function that begins to arrive now, that is, it is recommended have updated apps to its latest version. What you listen to in Spotify, on your Instagram To be able to share what you are listening, you just have to Create a new note on Instagram. You can do this directly from your user profile, but you can also do it by going to the private messages section, and starting a new note. When you are going to create a note, you have several options. Above all you can simply write a text, and below you can choose interactive notes. Here, click on the icon of the musical note To share a note related to music. This will take you to a screen where you can choose a song that you want to share. In it, you have to click on the option of Share from Spotify That will appear above all. You will need to have Spotify installed and the session initiated. Once you choose this option you don’t have to do more. You will go to the final preview, where you will see what you are listening to right now with the icon of headphones. Here, click on the button Share To send this note. And that’s it. With this, you will create a note in which What you are listening will always appear At all times, until the body expires at 24 hours. Good option to listen to a little more social music. And when someone clicks on your note, you can listen to a fragment and you will have the option to listen to that song in your spotify. In Xataka Basics | 14 apps and services to discover new music in Spotify, Apple Music and other streaming services

Spotify is no longer a music player. It is a “audio netflix” who wants to devour your whole day

by

After 18 years palmando money, Spotify premiered its age this year with its first profitable exercise in its history. That milestone has been followed by good news as its latest quarterly resultsthat tell their own story. A story that goes far beyond its 696 million users – 276 million of them, Premium. It is that of a silent but beastial metamorphosis. Spotify has ceased to be a music player to become something different. It is a time to capture time. When Daniel EK says that “people arrive at Spotify and stay in Spotify” is subtly describing its strategy: Colonize more and more sound moments of our day to day. A few years ago, Spotify’s natural competitor was Apple Music. And YouTube Music, Deezer, Tidal. Today their rivals are rather Tiktok, YouTube, Netflix, Instagram, and even your own concentration. Compete for your sustained attention. It is not worth being the one who puts background music. The growth in active users – 11% – is, more than more people listening to music, more people delivering fragments of their day to the same platform: Music to go to work. A podcast while you work. Another music while playing sports. An AUDS AUDIOLIBRO. Videoclips with which to kill dead times. Spotify has been weaving A network that catches routines, not a long time. That is the strategy: assault every moment in which we consume audio. And towards that the company goes, towards being much more than a modern Gramola. It wants to be the entity to whom we delegate the decision to hear in each context of our day. The audiobooks looked like a sweetbeard, something tertiary, but The decision to compete with Audible It seems more and more important. The reason: Spotify needs content that works at dead moments that music cannot fill out at all. Long journeys by car. Hours of cleaning at home. Night walks. The audiobooks, such as podcasts, turn Spotify into a company for all occasions, into the audio netflix they promised to be. Spotify detected that there was a silent war for the moments of “partial attention”. While we drive, we cook, clean, we close. Moments when music works, but where an interesting conversation can hook you more. That is why hundreds of millions were spent in Joe Rogan and company. To occupy temporary territories that escaped their control. With the audiobooks gaining weight, Spotify has completed its transformation. It is no longer a music app. Not a music app that has podcasts. Is A total audio platform that coincidentally also reproduces songs, homogenizing everything in that damn word called “content.” They have resigned to be perfect in something to be indispensable in everything. And it is working: almost 700 million people have decided to be in a space that serves as a unique sound universe and does not dispatch towards several specialized applications. Outstanding image | @felipepelaquim In Xataka | The problem is no longer that Spotify has been filled with artists AI: is that AI is “reviving” dead musicians

This album has been reproduced millions of times in Spotify but has not generated absolutely no benefit

by

‘Crisis (The Worthless Album)’ by Valentin Hansen It is not, of course, a normal album. Because Hansen is not a normal musician. It is rather A performative artist that he plotted this conceptual album with a single objective: not generating benefit, not leaving a trace on Spotify, demonstrating how absurd streaming They are getting used to us. 30 songs. In 2021, the artist based in Berlin Valentin Hansen launched this ‘crisis (The Worthless Album)’ which consisted of 30 tracks, all of them of 29 seconds. Why this duration? He stayed for a second to monetize them, generate Royalties or to be registered in the metrics of the platform, according to the rules of use of the platform. But here comes the amazing: he used a smartphones hacked to reproduce the album countless times. And demonstrate that it would not even generate benefits. A design issue. As They count on contemporary100‘Crisis (The Worthless Album)’ won zero euros in total, but “not by accident, but for a matter of pure design.” Its purpose was to generate exactly that benefit. It’s about a criticism of the economy of streamingwhere an artist earns $ 0.004 per reproduction, but algorithms favor mainstreamto what is already established purely economic interests, which falls into a very complicated mousetrap to make profitable. “I want to show how broken the system is,” Hansen said about his experiment. Real songs. Hansen is a real musician. It makes a self -conscious and hyperproduced indie (in fact, ‘crisis’ has eight real songs, only that the tracks are interrupted every 29 seconds, as has been said, thus starting each song in three or four pieces impossible to make profitable) and, in fact, ‘crisis’ arose as a reaction to its most popular song, ‘Killing a Friend’, after 1,7 million reproductions, only got 2,000 euros. Hence the criticism of the Spotify payment system: said in an interview than the initiative Bandcamp Fridayin which the platform gives all its income to artists, is the most reasonable way to make money with music in streaming. Other experiments in Spotify. It is not the first attempt to play with Spotify’s legal possibilities and vericuetos: Royalties). All completely silent. The band encouraged their followers to reproduce the album in continuous repetition while they slept, generating royalties. The goal? Finance with that money a tour of free concerts. And it worked: in seven weeks and after about 5.5 million views, ‘Sleepify’ generated $ 20,000. Of course, Spotify did not like this sympathetic hairmade and eliminated the album of its platform, adducing violations of its content policies and commenting that, as an effect of the media impact of ‘Sleepify’, they had received a large number of silent albums. Spotify ended up modifying its legal section, prohibiting issues in full in silence. Spotify mandates. For what Hansen’s experiment serves is to talk about the absolute dominance of Spotify in the industry and how unfair it is, therefore, that he has so much power and can decide how artists are rewarded and in what terms. And how that benefits the platformbut not to musicians. Therefore, it is important that in the face of the propaganda that Spotify is democratizing and verticalizing musicdiscordant voices such as Hansen still dare to denounce an unfair situation with artists. In Xataka | We already know what the key to something that seemed impossible, to earn money in Spotify was: being an AI

reproduces spotify without touching the mobile and keeps more surprises

by

It looks like a radio from another era, but inside hides functions that we did not see coming. Ikea has launched a Bluetooth speaker called Nattbadwith retro design, wireless function and something that usually reserves to some headphones: the possibility of reproducing spotify without having to look for the mobile at home. Vintage design with modern spirit Nattbad is designed not to go unnoticed. Its rectangular shape, its rounded corners and its front grid remind the desktop radios of decades ago. Ikea has thrown it into three colors – negral, pink and yellow – and presents it as an object designed not only to sound, but to be part of the space. The design responsible is Jon Eliason, who defines it as a “social meeting point at home”, inspired by those family radios that gathered people before streaming. One of Nattbad’s most curious details is his integration with Spotify tap. This function allows Put music by pressing a buttonwithout having to unlock the mobile or open the application. And if you don’t like what it sounds, you can press again for the system to choose another song. It is a more direct and unusual way of listening to music outside the headphones market. Nattbad In addition to sounding on its own, Nattbad allows you to link several speakers with each other to play the same music in different rooms. There is no need for an app, nor a specific Wifi network: it is enough to have more than one speaker and link them through Bluetooth. Nattbad Nattbad Cuesta 49.99 euros. It is not the cheapest speaker of the Ikea catalog, and of course it is not If we look at the market in generalwhere there are cheaper options. It remains in the hands of each user to decide if it fits their budget. Blomprakt This is not the only speaker that Ikea has on the horizon. The company has also announced Blompraktan integrated speaker lamp and a peculiar design, whose launch is scheduled for October. We do not know its characteristics and price. From JanuaryIn addition, Ikea plans to launch more than 20 new smart products Compatible with Matterthe standard that seeks to unify the domestic ecosystem. A relevant characteristic now that He directedits control center has finally added this promised compatibility. Images | IKEA In Xataka | Nothing Headphone (1), Analysis: The first Nothing headband headphones are beautiful, comfortable and they are heard of fear

An indie group is petalling in Spotify. All normal except for one thing: they are made with ia

by

A couple of months ago we talked about tools as powerful as Suno Ai that allowed to create practically indistinguishable songs of a generated by humans. There is nothing strange that, a few weeks later we are already seeing musical groups generated from Musical Models of AI, and that not only manage to deceive the public but also generate millions of listeners and, therefore, substantial amounts of money in benefits. The new case (and surely will not be the last one) is that of the false Folk The Velvet Slown band. Lie folk. The first calls for attention to the legitimacy of The Velvet Sundown took place in Reddit (in this and in this thread), where attention was called to the possible absence of the band despite its more than 550,000 monthly listeners have already been recommended by the platform algorithm. The reactions went from indignation to resignation, and at that time a boycott call was made to Spotify, for not clearly noticing the nature of these contents. How to detect it. Shortly after, the music expert Chris Dalla I explained in Tiktok How it was possible to distinguish The Velvet Sundown from a royal band: certain metal nuances in the voices, typical of when they are generated by AI, very little original titles (‘Dust on the Wind’, very similar to the legendary ‘dust in the Wind’ of Kansas), the clear origin by means of both the images of the group and of the description of the same (with false quotes or abundance of scripts. of chatgpt texts in English). And then, of course, there is the total absence of information about the band or its members on the Internet. There is no digital footprint prior to the appearance of the group in Spotify. The definitive test: Deezer. Deezer is one of the few platforms of streaming of music that has recognized the problems of an excess content generated by AI (18% of all that rises to digital platformsaccording to your own report). That is why they launched a tool that warns their listeners of the possibility that they are listening to artificially generated music. In the case of The Velvet Slown, His verdict is unequivocal: The possibilities that your songs have composed with Suno, you or other similar tool are very high. Why have so many reproductions. However, The Velvet Sundown does not have too many listeners signed to their profile: just 11,000 at the time of writing these lines. Where do all your listening monthly come from? Basically, to appear on playlists who arrive thanks to five very specific users, according to the investigation Musically: Extra music, Collective Solitude, Kultpop!, In-Between and Lost Records. These profiles have included the entire records of The Velvet Slown in very often lists, although their themes (for example, the Vietnam War) have no apparent relationship with the music of the band. But these appearances in lists lead them direct to the weekly discoveries of the algorithm. The juicy royalties. What generates this is an avalanche of Royalties whose legitimacy is, in the best, doubtful, since they are often used Bots to inflate the statistics (There are already, in fact, cases giving tumbos in court for this issue). The use of bots is not demonstrated with this new non-base, but the objections around it go rather by the ethical point of view: with its somewhat artificial success (based on “deceiving” the algorithm forcing its appearance in Playlists very listened to) are removing space to authentic bands. And money: reproductions are paid in Spotify between 0.003 and $ 0.005 for each listening, so that money is not going to real musicians. The precedent: the girls. At the end of 2024a Spanish band generated entirely by AI became the musical controversy of the moment. The girls obtained some impact with their first album, ‘Last bath’, and became interviewed by media such as eldiario.es. Those responsible, from anonymity, stated when they were discovered to be responsible for the lyrics, but not music or interpretation. In this case, they disappeared from Spotify by decision of their Altafonte distributor, although in a few days they returned to platforms, already self -managed. Those responsible fled forward with A manifesto in which they turned the project into an idea of ​​collaborative philosophy, trying to provide a certain experimental entity to the girls. Only seven months later, possibly their authors have managed to strain many other experiments on platforms … and are charging for it. In Xataka | Spotify has found the best use of AI: generates playlist from any text, such as chatgpt

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.