“I don’t know if I want my children to see short videos and are not able to see something more than 15 minutes”

The arrival of the new short videos formats driven by platforms such as Tiktok or Instagram has dragged YouTube and other social networks to adopt the same content format Based on the infinity scroll. That change has generated a growing concern among the pioneers themselves in online video. Steve Chen, co -founder of YouTube, has shown his doubts as a father and user with respect to this format of short fast consumption videos that Pop for all attention of the user. “I think Tiktok is entertainment, but it’s pure entertainment,” Chen said. Use and throw content. Within the framework of A talk with students From the Stanford Graduate School of Business, the YouTube co -founder was not fully comfortable with the idea that their young children grow up watching videos of a few seconds. “I do not know if I want my children to see short format content as their only form of entertainment, and that they are not able to see something that lasts more than 15 minutes,” Chen, father of two children confessed, answering the questions of Stanford’s students. These statements show a growing concern among parents: children are digital native, but that does not guarantee that they develop skills or have the necessary tools for the responsible consumption of content served in Infinite Scroll Format demanding of constant attention. The child’s attention capacity. Chen also insisted on an argument that has become frequent among researchers: excess short content can alter the capacity to concentrate, especially among the youngestaccording to published by The Guardian. “The shortest format content is equivalent to lower attention capacity,” Chen said in his response. This type of highly visual videos were described by the engineer as a simple entertainment that does not necessarily provide educational or formative value, but with a high risk of affecting The attention capacity and to the cognitive development of the youngest when exposed to increasingly brief and addictive stimuli. Screen time control. One of the situations that most disturb Chen is the role of algorithms in foster digital addiction. As explained by the founder of YouTube, many platforms depend economically that users, including children, spend as long as possible connected. “It is a delicate balance between what attracts user attention and what generates more income, compared to what is really useful,” he warned. Faced with this risk, Chen openly suggested that technology should “consider limiting the daily use time of these applications, according to the age of users.” Extended concern. Steve Chen is not the only leader in the digital field that has ruled on the risks of the doomscrolling. Sam Altman, who premiered paternity in February, was also worried about The first podcast OpenAI for the impact of social networks In younger users. “I am worried about children in technology. I think that short videos inject dopamine; it seems that children’s brain development is deeply affecting,” said Openai’s founder. In that same idea, the social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of the Super Survents coincides ‘The anxious generation’ and professor at the University of New York, which in different interventions has warned sharply: “Social networks are seriously damaging children in the western world,” in statements collected by Business Insider. The expert has also warned that “the destruction of human care worldwide could be an even greater cost for humanity than the epidemic of mental health and health problems.” Try to put doors to the field. Steve Chen mentioned in his talk, that some parents try to prevent their children from watching short videos “with vibrant colors and addictive eyes”, preferring longer, although less exciting formats. The reason is clear: it is sought to prevent minors from developing an early dependence on fast and instant content, difficult to reverse as they grow. That is why parents expose them to content with a more resting rate. “If they are not exposed to the short format content immediately, then they maintain satisfaction with that other type of content they are watching (with longer videos),” said the co -founder. In Xataka | How to recover the concentration that social networks and multitars have taken us Image | Wikimedia Commons (Taiwán Plus), Unspash (Albert Oliveira)

Those who bet in short for Tesla

The electric cars industry is living a Effervescence of innovation That, to which we already combed some cana, reminds us of what happened more than a decade ago with smartphones. Each new presentation It is a shake to the market and a headache for competition. In an unexpected turn in Load technologyByd has hit the table that has been heard until the last corner of the Tesla offices, causing record gains for significant losses and losses For others. Who loads faster, wins. “As fast as throwing gas.” With that premise byd he presented his new Super E-Patform Load System up to 1,000 kW. Then, the price of your actions He shot 15% in the stock market reaching a historical record. This technological advance has been received with great enthusiasm for investors, both for those who had put their money in Byd, and those who had invested in Tesla. Elon Musk’s company, received the news as a jug of cold water, just at a time when he began to lift his head after severe corrective that have received the actions of Tesla in recent weeks. After Byd’s announcement, Tesla’s titles fell 7%. This decrease in Value of Tesla’s actions Not only does it reflect the fierce competition in the electric vehicle sector, but it has also provided substantial profits to investors who bet in short for the fall of Tesla. OK With what is published by Fortunethis investors “to losses” were pocketed about 16,000 million dollars. Short investments: betting down. The Short investmentsalso known as “short sales”, it is a financial strategy in which investors bet on the drop in the price of a company. In essence, these investors borrow shares, sell them immediately and wait for the price to fall to repurchase them again at a lower price, returning the actions provided and staying with the difference between the price at which they sold it and to which they bought it after its fall as a profit. This practice, although legal and common in financial marketsIt is controversial because it implies benefiting from the difficulties or the failure of a certain company. Short investors argue that their activity helps maintain market efficiency and discover problems in companies, while their critics argue that they can magnify price falls and harm companies that cross a financial bump. Invest in Tesla for Revenge. According to publishedFinancial Times, Tesla’s short investments have increased by 16.3% during the last month in the heat of the consecutive falls in the manufacturer’s price due to It breaks into sales worldwide and discontent of investors and customers With Elon Musk’s role Doge front. These short investments have become 2.6% of the company’s total according to the financial newspaper data. “Tesla had a very strong brand value and Elon has managed to destroy it completely. Elon Musk’s crusade against short vendors. Elon Musk has expressed on numerous occasions his aversion towards these types of investments, reaching them as “immoral.” His animosity towards short vendors is not a secret, and has publicly declared From your profile in xHis intention to “annihilate” who are committed to Tesla. Musk’s hostility towards this practice is based on his belief that short sales can artificially manipulate the price of shares and damage the reputation of innovative companies such as Tesla. In the past, Musk He has lashed out against important names like Bill Gates, with which he even reached break their personal relationships for maintaining short positions against Tesla. In Xataka | Murphy’s law conspires against Elon Musk: if something has been able to happen to their companies this week, it has happened In Xataka | Elon Musk has forged the fame of a bold founder: he did not create either of the two companies that made him a millionaire Image | Flickr (Gage Skidmore), Byd

Perplexity is going to launch its own browser. It is one more proof that traditional browsers fall short in the AI ​​era

Perplexity He has announced Cometa browser specifically designed for the AI ​​era. It is part of something else: of the trend in which several technology seek to reimagine how we interact with the web. Why is it important. The next wave of A -centered browsers reveals an uncomfortable truth: traditional browsers are not optimized for a world in which AI agents will act as intermediaries between information and us. Chrome, Safari, Edge or Firefox can improve whatever they want in these capabilities, but IA deserves a creation from scratch. The Browser Company understood and paralyzed the development of ARC to create something new: day. The context. Perpleplexity has opened its waiting list for Comet, its next browser that promises to “reinvent” our way of accessing the web. This movement comes just weeks after OpenAi will present its operator agentand in the middle of Rumors about a possible OpenAi’s own browser. Current browsers were designed for humans who use keyboards and mice, not for ia agents who need to interact with the website of radically different shapes. Yes, but. The first generation of AI agents as Openai Operator uses chrome modified versions to complete tasks, offering an almost theatrical show: we see a bot by moving a cursor and writing how a human would do. It is effective, but also inefficient. Chrome use as a base poses another problem: what will happen when Google completely integrates Gemini In your browser? Rivals such as Openai and Perplexity will be vulnerable to Alphabet. New era. The race to create the final browser for the AI ​​era remembers the Navigators War of the 90s, when Netscape and Microsoft struggled to dominate Internet access. That conflict initially won Microsoft with Internet Explorer, but Google Chrome, which did not even exist then, ended up dominating the market years later. The lesson is clear: the winner of this new battle can be a company that still does not have a browser. Or that it has not even been founded yet. Several actors are already on stage: Perplexity with Comet, the aforementioned The Browser Company with Dia, and rumors on similar OpenAi projects. The integration of AI models such as Claude, Gemini and GPT directly in the navigation experience will be key. Between the lines. True innovation does not consist of adding functions from AI to existing browsers, but completely reimagining the navigator concept. A browser designed for the AI ​​era should allow both traditional human use and the efficient functioning of autonomous agents, perhaps with different ways according to who is “behind the wheel.” The browsers Ai-first They will probably dispense with interface elements designed for humans when they operate in automatic mode, using more efficient APIS and communication channels to interact with the web. A good simile is that of the autonomous car: if it is able to drive on its own, it makes no sense that it makes a steering wheel, pedals and five seats looking forward: you can and must reimagine the cabin completely. Deepen. For companies such as Perplexity, launching its own browser not only involves diversifying its product offer, but also ensuring their independence from the platforms controlled by their competitors. Same incentives that OpenAI has to launch its own proposal. The browser has historically been the entrance door to the Internet, and whoever controls this door will have a disproportionate influence on our digital experience. Google knows it well: Chrome has provided you a huge strategic advantage. We are witnessing the birth of a new category of software that could transform our relationship with the Internet as much as the original browsers did. The question is not whether browsers Ai-first They will replace the traditional ones, but when they will do it and who will lead this transformation. Openai looks like the great threat to him status quo from Google. And there will be more. Outstanding image | Perplexity, Xataka with mockuuups studio In Xataka | Mozilla’s long crisis: an eternal users and a Google dependency that is still majority

They are becoming more and more short

Aemet He has just published his prognosis For the next three weeks and there is only one valid conclusion: winter is over. It is true that the forecast is not very surprising because, on the one hand, winters are increasingly short and warm and, on the other, the weather spring begins on March 1. However, we are not talking about something “normal.” Aemet’s forecasts temperatures above of the expected. That is, not only winter is over, but we are installed in a perpetual November. What does the prognosis about this week say? To begin with, he says that the last week of February “it will probably be warmer than normal in most of Spain, especially in the north and east of the peninsula.” Balearic Islands will be the exception. It is important to keep in mind that the situation will not be as tempered as in the previous week and that can distort our perception over it; But if we go to the data, it will be warmer than it should be the last week of February. It will rain in some areas (especially at the northern end of the peninsula), but they will not have a great entity. And, as it begins to be tradition, it does not seem likely to reach the southwest. And the next two weeks? According to Aemetthe trend “The most likely scenario for the following two weeks shows temperatures higher than normal for the time of year in practically the entire country.” Precipitation is more difficult to determine, but everything seems to indicate that “during the week of March 3 to 9, the storms will circulate through latitudes superior to ours and that the most abundant rains are limited to the northwest end of the peninsula.” To what extent can we trust this? This type of long -term forecasts are not as precious, valid and reliable as we do a week seen. And they are not because the weather pieces are not on the table and we cannot simulate how they will move in the next few days. However, our ability to determine trends has improved a lot in recent years and consistently these predictions have been useful for preparing for the future. What really matters. The problem, however, is not in what happens these three weeks. The problem is that, As they pointed from Meteotetuán“the trend is maintained.” A trend that will push large areas of the country to reunite with drought. In Catalonia, in fact, the situation is already very complicated (Sau’s swamp, in the heart of the Ter-Llobregat system is below 6%) and, in Andalusia, there is no good news either. Not only that Málaga You have not managed to recover from drought; It is that in areas like Córdoba the situation has caused garlic production to move (In 83%) to other areas of the country. May the trend be maintained, right now, it is a bad news. Image | Tropical tidbits In Xataka | More pollen, more deaths behind the wheel: the unexpected effect of the allergies season on traffic accidents

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.