safest

If I point to the volume, I am not sure if I learned a lot or little in the university. But I am clear about one thing: I learned what was news or, at least, the criteria to point out whether an event is news. When the issues that can be discussed are put on a wording, different aspects are valued. Truthfulness, current, proximity … and novelty. And if an event comes out in the media it is because it is usually “unique, unpublished, unlikely or out of the ordinary.” I don’t say it, University institutions say. That is why it makes little sense to affirm that electric cars are dangerous based exclusively on news. We could do it if we had relevant studies that pointed out that the number of electric cars is notoriously higher than those of combustion. But it is not the case. We do know that the fire of an electric car is more complicated to turn off and more virulent. That is why it is logical that take action on ships where they are transported or working on New protocols in fire bodies. That does not mean that the risks of this technology are greater. In spite of everything, it also enters within a certain logic that when a fire is given or any other risk situation, the alarm voices are multiplied. From municipalities where They consider whether to continue buying electric cars a parking lots that prohibit their step. In that case, companies only have to show that their batteries are as safe as any other component of a car. As if I could pass them a tank over them. The crazy idea of ​​a tank Although it seems nonsense, it makes sense that manufacturers refine ideas when demonstrating the safety of electric car batteries. Keep in mind that, for example, In South Korea, an intense debate has been lived on whether or not these cars may accumulate in garages after A Mercedes Eqe will explode last year. When Byd arrived in Spain he had a challenge ahead. I needed to make themselves known and, above all, demonstrate that it was a company in which you could trust. We already know the prejudices towards the Chinese product. As a journalist, I don’t know how many times I could visualize This video in which a nail is going through an LFP battery without anything happening. It was one of the classic images. The other was the pressure tests. When too much pressure is applied to a battery (electric car or any other device) runs the risk of experimenting A thermal leak. Heat grows inside, chemistry is released and the pressure increases to cause an explosion with the consequent fire. To avoid this, the housings are designed to release the accumulated pressure inside, with the aim that if we have an accident, the pressure exerted on the battery does not cause an explosion. And the company can already tell us about figures and data and everything we want. But nothing better than the visual. Click on the image to go to the original tweet That is why Geely, explain in Carnewschina He has taken his new “Aegis Gold Brick Battery” a 36 -ton tank and has passed it over. And what happened? Nothing. Nothing at all. The battery did not give any sign of damage despite receiving 1.8 times the minimum pressure required by Chinese institutions to standardize a new battery. You can see the video on this link. They point out that the tank not only He crushed the battery On one occasion. He passed over it, returned on his steps and continued to crush her repeatedly. And did the same going over individual cells. The battery package “maintained its structural integrity without bulges, leaks, fires or explosions,” they emphasize. To overcome the test, the aegis Gold Brick Battery has been designed with a double wet coating that facilitates the dispersion of heat and thermal leaks since it is especially heat resistant to heat generated by aluminum oxide. It also has liquid-electrical separation of the materials. Photo | Geely In Xataka | Samsung has just revolutionized batteries for electric cars. In autonomy, in load time and in useful life