We are attending at the beginning of an era dangerous in commercial aviation. One in which if you go to a funeral the ticket will cost you more

In the United States they are already called “surveillance -based prices” (Surveillance Pricing), and they consist in a simple and scary principle: that companies that sell products and services do it in a personalized way with AI algorithms that will analyze all the information they have about you. Delta, what are you doing. In Delta Air Lines they raised to do that, but the idea He ended up knowing each other and being very criticized. So much that several American senators published an open letter demanding the CEO of the airline to explain those plans. In Delta they intended to eliminate static prices to replace them with dynamic prices that were adjusted to what each client theoretically was willing to pay. How are these personalized prices calculated? Companies such as Fetcher – who collaborates with Delta or Virgin Atlantic – have been working on these systems since 2019. They have deep learning experts (Deep Learning) and have one “Large Market Model“, an AI model that is capable of generating those custom prices based on the information of each user. Spying on to meet you better. In fact his CEO, Roy Cohen, explained That this model is trained “with all the data we can collect”, and on the company’s website they affirm that this type of systems could increase the benefits of airlines by 4.4 billion dollars annually. To collect this data, surveillance -based price systems use all types of third -party channels such as the purchasing history of a passenger, its navigation history, its geolocation, its activity in social networks, its biometric data or its financial statement. If you leave funeral, we upload the price. The former member of the FTC Lina Khan Council He already explained that this type of custom pricing systems could raise disturbing cases. A conceivable example would be that of an airline that uses artificial intelligence to collect a higher rate to a passenger “because the company knows that it has just suffered a death in the family and needs to fly to the other side of the country.” The intention was to abandon static prices. In July the president of Delta, Glen Hauenstein, declared which hoped that at the end of the year 20% of the price of its tickets will be determined individually by these AI systems. At that time that percentage was 3%, the triple that in autumn of 2024, but is that the objective was to completely abandon the current price setting systems to make the jump to these personalized and calculated prices based on what is known about each passenger. The pain threshold. The system would also put to the limit the so -called “pain threshold” of each client, establishing that maximum amount that the data suggests that these passengers want to pay. If you are in a hurry – as in the hypothetical situation of having to go to a funeral – the price would increase, while in a routine trip the price would be comparatively lower. Consumer surplus. There is a theoretical principle that explains very well the intentions of companies such as Delta Air Lines. Is called consumer surplusand it is the difference between what a client is willing to pay and what he really pays. Companies seek to capture that surplus, and AI allows you to do it almost perfectly. That, of course, entails a risk: if customers pay the maximum for what they buy, they will have less income for other expenses. Here it will be more difficult for them to do it. In Europe carrying out this type of plans seems difficult: the General Data Protection Regulation (RGPD) prohibits automated decisions based on personal data and that have meaningful effects on the user unless it gives their explicit consent. Like dynamic, but supervitaminated prices. It really is of all known that there are many companies that make use of the so -called dynamic prices that try to adjust supply and demand. Airlines have always used them —The price varies according to the day and time of the week or the number of days before the flight – but they are also well known in VTC companies such as Uber or Cabify. Said systems, of coursethey have unleashed more than one controversyand there were suspicions that Uber even raised the price if you reserved a trip When you had little battery. However, these systems do not have that massive data collection section and user profiles that raise prices based on surveillance. Image | Simon Ray In Xataka | There are people getting free flights and money at the expense of airlines. Your superpower: be very patient

Many clients are no longer believed that who is attending to them is not an AI

Customer service is one of the most susceptible departments of being replaced by AI agents, such and As we have seen In recent months. Although the experiment They have not gone quite well To some of them, other companies keep their chatbots as the first line of attention of their customers. Such and as they counted in Bloombergthat is generating an unusual situation when those who attend to customers are human of flesh and blood: they confuse them With an AI and are forced to constantly demonstrate that they are real people. AI in the call-centers. Although the recent movements of the great technological ones pointed out that the customer service departments were going to be the first to notice the Impact of AI on employmentthe truth is that, According to data From the Gartner consultant, 95% of the companies surveyed intended to keep their human operators on the payroll. Others, however, yes They are depositing their trust in chatbots -based call centers to serve their customers. That does not mean that AI and systems of Natural language processing (PLN) are not used in marketing campaigns. That has made customers doubt whether who attends them are really human operators. “I tell you: ‘I swear, I’m a real person,” he said Bloomberg Lindsey, an operator dedicated to customer service and sales of American express credit cards. “I even ask them: ‘Is there anything they want to say to prove that I am a real person?” We no longer know what is true. In many cases, the AI ​​does not replace the operator in its role as final customer service, but acts as technology to redirect calls, so, when they reach the human operator, the client has already had to deal with an AI. Lindsey says that sometimes the clients ask “you are an AI?” Other times, they simply start shouting for talking to an operator or hanging directly. Nir Eisikovits, Professor of Philosophy and director of the Applied Ethics Center at Massachusetts University, He pointed outin The conversation that the current ability to talk about AI models is only an advance of the efforts of companies that develop that Technology to imitate humans in the rhythm or tone of the voices. “The inability to distinguish whether you are talking to a human or not only will go more,” making it much more complicated to distinguish if a client is Talking to an AI or with a real human. Sales scripts do not help. Sales techniques used by human operators do not help when distinguishing them from an AI. The call centers sector has evolved a lot From its birth In the 60s. Now the operators are monitored to control the conversation time and ensure that sellers follow a certain scripted structure For the entire sales process. In that script it is indicated from the tone in which they must go to the client, lists of words of obligatory use or prohibited, etc. All this cornering in communication, with predefined responses and protocols, does not help the client to distinguish whether there is a person or an AI on the other side. “It seems to me a compliment that I think I am professional enough to sound like a recording,” said BJ, a computer support agent. For his part, Seth, Lindsey’s partner offering American Express services, said that at least they ask if it’s an AI once a week. On one occasion, a client was questioning it for 20 minutes To check if it was an AIasking him about his hobbies, if he liked to fish in his free time and what kind of cane he used “it was as if he wanted to see if he failed. At a certain moment, I even felt that it was an AI tried to learn to be human,” said the telephone operator. What makes us human. The sense of humor is perceived as a feature intrinsically human, closely linked to intelligenceto the social context and the domain of language inflections to fit their meaning in a joke or joke. Therefore, humor is a resource that some operators use to confirm that they are human. Faith Lau, who works in an AI sales company in Canada, said that the first time they confused her with a bot she answered telling the customer’s joke. What his client did not know is that an AI is also Able to count jokes. Sarah’s strategy, which works in the US government anti -fraud, is much more visceral. “When I interact with an AI, it simply lets me speak, it does not interrupt me,” says the operator, for that reason when someone asks him to show that he is human, he tries to interrupt everything he can when they insist that he is not human. Certainly, There is nothing more human Someone interrupts you while you talk. In Xataka | We have tried Sesame’s conversational. It is the experience closest to a “human voice” that we have seen Image | Unspash (VAGARO)

China is attending a crazy race to demonstrate who has the safest battery. That’s why they crush them with tanks

If I point to the volume, I am not sure if I learned a lot or little in the university. But I am clear about one thing: I learned what was news or, at least, the criteria to point out whether an event is news. When the issues that can be discussed are put on a wording, different aspects are valued. Truthfulness, current, proximity … and novelty. And if an event comes out in the media it is because it is usually “unique, unpublished, unlikely or out of the ordinary.” I don’t say it, University institutions say. That is why it makes little sense to affirm that electric cars are dangerous based exclusively on news. We could do it if we had relevant studies that pointed out that the number of electric cars is notoriously higher than those of combustion. But it is not the case. We do know that the fire of an electric car is more complicated to turn off and more virulent. That is why it is logical that take action on ships where they are transported or working on New protocols in fire bodies. That does not mean that the risks of this technology are greater. In spite of everything, it also enters within a certain logic that when a fire is given or any other risk situation, the alarm voices are multiplied. From municipalities where They consider whether to continue buying electric cars a parking lots that prohibit their step. In that case, companies only have to show that their batteries are as safe as any other component of a car. As if I could pass them a tank over them. The crazy idea of ​​a tank Although it seems nonsense, it makes sense that manufacturers refine ideas when demonstrating the safety of electric car batteries. Keep in mind that, for example, In South Korea, an intense debate has been lived on whether or not these cars may accumulate in garages after A Mercedes Eqe will explode last year. When Byd arrived in Spain he had a challenge ahead. I needed to make themselves known and, above all, demonstrate that it was a company in which you could trust. We already know the prejudices towards the Chinese product. As a journalist, I don’t know how many times I could visualize This video in which a nail is going through an LFP battery without anything happening. It was one of the classic images. The other was the pressure tests. When too much pressure is applied to a battery (electric car or any other device) runs the risk of experimenting A thermal leak. Heat grows inside, chemistry is released and the pressure increases to cause an explosion with the consequent fire. To avoid this, the housings are designed to release the accumulated pressure inside, with the aim that if we have an accident, the pressure exerted on the battery does not cause an explosion. And the company can already tell us about figures and data and everything we want. But nothing better than the visual. Click on the image to go to the original tweet That is why Geely, explain in Carnewschina He has taken his new “Aegis Gold Brick Battery” a 36 -ton tank and has passed it over. And what happened? Nothing. Nothing at all. The battery did not give any sign of damage despite receiving 1.8 times the minimum pressure required by Chinese institutions to standardize a new battery. You can see the video on this link. They point out that the tank not only He crushed the battery On one occasion. He passed over it, returned on his steps and continued to crush her repeatedly. And did the same going over individual cells. The battery package “maintained its structural integrity without bulges, leaks, fires or explosions,” they emphasize. To overcome the test, the aegis Gold Brick Battery has been designed with a double wet coating that facilitates the dispersion of heat and thermal leaks since it is especially heat resistant to heat generated by aluminum oxide. It also has liquid-electrical separation of the materials. Photo | Geely In Xataka | Samsung has just revolutionized batteries for electric cars. In autonomy, in load time and in useful life

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.