Anthropic has taken Apple’s strategy against Microsoft to the Super Bowl: making using the rival look ridiculous

Anthropic has opened the Super Bowl by attacking OpenAI with ads that show virtual therapists advertising dating apps and personal trainers selling boosts for short people. The message: “Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude“(“The ads are reaching the AI. But not Claude.”) Sam Altman has responded in X calling them “dishonest” and accusing them of “doublespeak“, “double speech” in Spanish, although a better adapted translation could be “deceptive language” or simply “hypocrisy.” It seems like a minor skirmish, two rivals fighting over an advertisement. But under that hood is a billion-dollar question: What kind of business will AI be when it’s established? The history of the Internet is summarized in two great models: One free supported by advertising: Google, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok… regardless of whether they have premium versions. Other direct payment by subscription: Netflix, DAZN, Disney+, Apple Music, PSN… The first aims to maximize the audience, the second aims to maximize the revenue per user. The AI ​​is right now deciding which of the two paths it takes. In Xataka AI is breaking one of the oldest economic paradigms in history: that cheap equals "bad" OpenAI has already chosen and is starting to test putting ads on free ChatGPT accounts. Altman justifies it with the classic argument of democratization: “More Texans use free ChatGPT than the total number of people using Claude in the United States.” In other words: they want to reach those billions of people who are not going to pay 20 dollars a month. And for that you need advertising. Anthropic chooses the opposite. “Anthropic offers an expensive product to rich people,” Altman reproaches him. In a way, it is true: Claude is betting above all on contracts with companies and premium subscriptions of 20, 100 and 200 dollars per month. Their model depends on the AI ​​being valuable enough for you to pay for it. And so that you look from time to time to the higher plan with the temptation to go up one more step. Without advertising, without sponsored links and without responses being influenced by advertisers. The difference is not only business, it is product. An AI with advertising has different incentives than one without it. What happens when you ask the assistant what car to buy you and there is a manufacturer paying to appear in their answers? What about medical, financial, legal advice? OpenAI has promised that “ads do not influence responses.” That’s what he said in minute 0. But that promise will be increasingly difficult to sustain as monetization pressure increases. {“videoId”:”x9u4ml2″,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Does Gemini 3 surpass ChatGPT? This is Google’s new AI”, “tag”:”Webedia-prod”, “duration”:”156″} Anthropic has its own problem: If it only reaches those who can afford to pay, AI becomes a tool of the elites. A technology that promises to democratize knowledge ends up reproducing the class divisions that already exist. We saw this coming with the arrival of $200 plans to access the AI ​​elite. A gap that creates another gap, The parallel with the history of the Internet is inevitable. Free social networks caught (almost) all of us in the 1910s, but in return they built advertising surveillance machines optimized for the engagementnot for anyone’s well-being. Payment services are cleaner, but also more exclusive. So AI is now at that bifurcation point: OpenAI is committed to being the YouTube of AI: free for everyone, supported by ads and with premium versions for those who want to pay. Anthropic wants to be the Netflix: better experience and free of ads, but only for those who pay. It is true that it maintains a free plan, but its limits are a continuous invitation to check out or leave. And now it’s up for grabs What kind of relationship with those machines that know more and more about us and from which we ask more and more?. Whether they will be services that serve us or whether they will be platforms that monetize us. In Xataka | The AI ​​of 2026 brings an uncomfortable truth: the most useful will be the one that watches us the most Featured image | Anthropic (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news Anthropic has taken Apple’s strategy against Microsoft to the Super Bowl: making using the rival look ridiculous was originally published in Xataka by Javier Lacort .

they went to the trouble of cashing ridiculous checks

Have you ever wondered if Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos Or would Bill Gates bend down to pick up a coin from the ground? And for a 20 euro bill? Apparently that same question was asked in the 90s in the satirical magazine Spyso they decided to test the extent to which some of the most famous rich Americans cared about ridiculously small amounts of money, even when they already had enormous fortunes. Which It started as an inside joke. ended up becoming a real experiment with very specific figures and proper names that was published in said magazine in July 1990. Spy’s prank: ridiculous checks for millionaires To carry out the experiment, the magazine’s editors had to think about what would be the equivalent of taking the trouble to bend down to pick up a penny when you’re already a billionaire. The solution they found to carry it out was quite ingenious: send checks to the millionaires worth a few cents. Since each check was nominal, when the chosen millionaire cashed his check, the magazine’s editors received the charge and knew which millionaire had “bent down” for his coin. In this case, the effort is even less, since the millionaire in question has to go to a bank to cash the check, which is much more intentional than simply bending over while walking. As and as they remembered in Celebrity Networththe editors left no loose ends and Spy created a fictitious but legal company called National Refund Clearinghouse and opened a real bank account to use in the experiment. From that company all refund checks for small amounts of money would be sent to a list of very rich people. To avoid raising suspicions, a note would be sent along with each check explaining that it was a refund for an erroneous charge, something that in those years sounded routine and not at all suspicious for anyone used to handling many invoices. The first shipment was made with $1.11 checks addressed to 58 very famous billionaires at the time. Among them were names like Cher, Oscar de la Renta, Michael Douglas, Christopher Reeve, Martin Scorsese, Ralph Lauren, Rupert Murdock or the young heir to a real estate empire: Donald Trump. In a period of approximately two months, 26 of those 58 millionaires cashed the $1.11 check they had received. The remaining 32 millionaires simply ignored it completely, establishing a clear percentage from the start: around 44.8% of the recipients decided that $1.11 was well worth the effort to “bend” to collect it. The rest did not lift a finger for that amount. To no one’s surprise, Donald Trump was one of those who did not miss the slightest opportunity to get a little richerfalling in this first round: its price was $1.11. Putting more bait on the hook After the surprisingly good result of the first round of checks, Spy editors wanted to find out how much the combination of effort and reward could be played with. So they decided to send a new check to the 32 millionaires who hadn’t bothered to cash the first check. This time they doubled their bet by issuing checks worth two incredible dollars. The actor Richard Gere and the singer Carly Simon, along with four other celebrities ended up succumbing to the generous reward of the new consignment. Not happy with the percentage of millionaires and celebrities that the second round had collected, the editors of the satirical magazine decided to up their ante to an impressive $3.47. Only two millionaires fell into the new trap and cashed Spy’s generous check. Given the low success rate, it was clear that the maximum limit they were willing to cash had been reached and that they would have to raise the figure much higher to attract the attention of those who did not bother to cash the check. It was time to test to what extent the 26 millionaires who had cashed the $1.11 checks would be able to lower their reward level. Those 26 celebrities who had cashed the first check were sent a second one again. check worth 64 cents. The paper it was written on was more expensive than the amount of the check. Curiously, on that occasion only 13 millionaires decided to collect them, just 50% of the initial group. However, Spy still had one final trick: send a third check to those serial collectors who had cashed the $1.11 and the 64-cent checks. On this occasion, the amount of the check would be 13 cents of dollar. It wasn’t even worth the ink it was written with. money is money As expected, this time the percentage of collections plummeted. However, only two people collected the last amount. What surprised the Spy editors most were the names of these people: the frequent arms dealer of the jet set parties of Marbella of the 90s, Adnan Khashoggi, and Donald Trump, current president of the United States. At first glance, Spy’s experiment seems to remain an ingenious and brilliant joke by the magazine to the greatest fortunes of the 90s in the United States. However, what is really revealed is a psychological background in the relationship of some millionaires with regarding finances. Even if they are worth billions of dollars, they collect everything. No matter how insignificant the profits, money is money. In Xataka | The emir of Qatar travels in a private jet so big it helped upgrade Sardinia airport Image | Nano Banana, Flickr (Gage Skidmore), Unsplash (Joshua Hoehne)

We believed that Nvidia was the company that had benefited most from AI. Micron is ridiculous

Micron is at historical maximums in Nasdaq, and rightly. The American manufacturer is taking a lot of benefit from the FEVER through the AI ​​and the data centers. The demand for memory chips is growing extraordinarily, but that has two faces. A good for micron, and another bad for customers and consumers. They all love micron. Citigroup analysts They promoted these days Micron’s target price from $ 150 to 175. The reason: according to its data, the company will have financial results “much better than consensus” when these are presented on September 23. Micron is doing so well that it even exceeds the growth of Nvidia. Source: Bloomberg The chips devastate. Yeah A week ago The shares were around $ 125, yesterday they closed at $ 150 and before market openings that figure is $ 155. This year the value has already grown by 81%, exceeding 33%Nvidia growth, although it is also true that the company led by Jensen Huang grew especially in 2024 (approximately 170%). Other companies such as Broadcom (55%), SK Hynix (91.88%in the South Korean bag), or TSMC (31%) also show an outstanding growth in the bags. Micron’s “Compute Networking” division is the one corresponding to the data centers. As can be seen, sales in that segment are already more than half of all of the last quarter. Source: Paul/Note. The commitment to HBM memories goes well. Micron has dedicated many resources to boost the manufacture of HBM memories, used precisely in the accelerators (GPUS) that are used in data centers. Independent analysis confirm the increasing weight of both these memoirs and the AI ​​segment in the micron business Micron will raise prices. According to Citi analysts, workloads for the inference of AI need more DRAM and NAND memories, and demand is spectacularly. The problem is that this demand will overcome the supply, and Micron will take advantage of the occasion to do something logical (for her): upload prices. Up to 30%. This is what it indicates Trendforce And also Some media In China, according to which Micron has notified its distribution channel partners today that the prices of their storage products will rise between 20% and 30%. In fact, the quotes of the DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4 and LPDDR5 memories have been suspended among others: “All prices agreed with customers will be canceled and the quotes will be suspended. All products are expected to stop quoting for a week. “That involves not only industrial and consumer memories, and the chips for the automotive industry will rise in price by 70%. Sandisk and TSMC have already announced up. Both TSMC and Sandisk announced Price increases For memory chips in the past days. That will affect its great clients –apple, Nvidia, among others – and as indicated In Techpowerup It is a clear confirmation that manufacturers want to maintain their gross margins. In Sandisk there have been 10% prices due to the “growing demand” of the AI ​​market, data centers and mobile devices. At the moment, they indicate In Trendforcethat climb has encountered resistance from customers. In Xataka | Intel’s recent history is that of a failure. Now he has found a niche from which to resurface: HBM memories

The visual spectacularity of ‘The Witcher 4’ is ridiculous everything seen so far. And it is the main sin of the industry

The technical demo of ‘The Witcher 4’ has left the players community speech and has become the star demo of the State of Unreal 2025where Epic Games has presented the latest news regarding its star graphic engine. A waste of overwhelming graphics that, at the same time, summarizes one of the great problems of the industry: being always dealing with futures. What has been seen. First of all, it should be emphasized that the seen is a technical demo IN-ENGINENot a video In-game. That is, it is the Unreal Engine 5 running in real time, nothing of a CGI scene, but it is not a captured fragment of the game. In this case it ran in a PlayStation 5, but CD Projakt wanted to make it clear that it is still not clear in which format the format will appear New installment of ‘The Witcher’. It is simply an exhibition of everything that the game can offer in terms of characters animations, fauna, mapping, reactions. A wonder that as we already knew, will star in an old acquaintance of the saga: Ciri. Mea guilt. This presentation also serves for CD Projakt Red to reassure players: The fiasco of ‘Cyberpunk 2077’ In consoles, they say (without hesitation, qualify as “disaster”), it will not be repeated. That is why they do not have a date for this ‘The Witcher 4’: the time that is necessary to become a “new reference” of games of this type will be in development. In times of ‘GTA VI‘It is not a bad purpose, but the truth is that the seen seems to be up to the circumstances: the magnitude of the scenarios, the naturalness of the movements, the realism of the gestures, the apparent diversity of possible reactions of the characters … is simply overwhelming. Three beasts. Currently, we have three graphic beasts outings of the mainstream With greater technical and monetary muscle of the industry: this ‘The Witcher 4’, which, like everything about CD Project Red, is at the visual avant -garde of the medium; ‘Gears of War E-Day‘, which we will possibly see gameplay Soon, and that in exhibitions like this kinematics made with the game engine we can expect a return in style of the saga; And, of course, ‘gta vi’, what has not yet shown gameplaybut that has taught incredibly realistic cinematics made with the game engine. Only the elders. That is, games of three industry giants (CD Projakt, Microsoft and Rockstar), whose launch we can set, in the best case, in the medium term: perhaps we do not have them to have them in our hands until entering 2026. And that is a problem: the games that technically push the industry, on the one hand come from the mastodons of the sector. Companies accustomed to operating with a franchise coup (such as these titles) and to ensure the shooting with revolutionary games in the visual … and only in that. The damn hype. And we return to the usual problem: the games are very expensive to produce (With its 100 million estimated budget, in fact, ‘GTA VI’ is going to be the most expensive in history, with 2,000 million), so the producers do not risk, and from the side of the players we complain that we are not going anywhere, and it is the fish that bite the tail. Those who have the waist to move in unpublished directions to the industry can not allow it, even if they have technological monsters such as Unreal Engine 5. And so we are looking at a distant future. So far away, that CD Projekt Red cannot even reveal what platforms ‘The Witcher 4’ is going to come out. Video games have always been held on promises, and we treasure enough bad experiences on the matter (yes, CD Projekt Red, we have already forgiven you, but the ‘Cyberpunk 2077’ bugs do not forget as well as so) as to distrust the “will arrive when it is.” ‘The Witcher 4’ looks like a heart attack, but paradoxically, we are tired of having to wait sitting. Header | CD Projakt Red In Xataka | All the questions and doubts that remain to be resolved from the Nintendo Switch 2 to a week of its launch

Starliner astronauts made nine months of extra hours. The bonus they are going to receive from NASA is ridiculous

The image of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams finally on earth It will be possibly one of the 2025 snapshots. To remember his HISTORY HISTORY in space after the multiple leaks and failures of the Boeing Starliner. If you are wondering if it is worth being an astronaut after such a case, the answer is given by the bonus that they will receive for that time “more” in orbit. It is not a matter of money. It goes for long. As We countAstronauts Williams and Wilmore finally returned to Earth after nine months have passed in space, a period much longer than initially planned. His mission aboard the Boeing Starliner began in June 2024 and had to last just over a week. However, a ruling in the capsule propellars prevented its correct coupling with the International Space Station (EEI), leaving astronauts stranded in orbit until the technical problems were solved. The delay generated Great anxiety in social networkswith many speculating about the safety and well -being of astronauts. However, Williams and Wilmore remained firm in their commitment to the mission and denied the statements that they were “abandoned” or “trapped.” In fact and according to Wilmore himself clarifiedthese types of unforeseen events are part of the work and are something for which they are prepared. The economic sacrifice. Despite the extreme challenges they face, the truth is that NASA astronauts do not receive additional compensation for the danger of their missions or for long hours of work in space. Williams and Wilmore earn a salary that is public: an upright annual 152,258 dollars based on updated NASA rates. However, and here is the Quid that differentiates it with other types of “ordinary” works, the salary does not include payment for extra hours, holidays or dangerous conditions, a notable difference with respect to many other well -paid professions on earth. According to Mike Massiminoformer NASA astronaut, “there is no extra pay due to danger, or compensation for working longer in space,” which means that, despite having spent nine months in orbit instead of a week, astronauts will not receive any additional remuneration. The closest thing to an “extra” pay you receive is a small daily stipendio of 5 dollars for being in space, a very small amount and we would say that ridiculous, adding just $ 1,430 for the 286 days that passed in the US. What does NASA say. For its part, the American space agency argues that astronauts They have all their expenses coveredincluding transport, accommodation and food during their stay in the US. Again, compared to other work of high salaries that do not imply physical risks, astronaut’s pay may seem disproportionate, especially if we take into account the danger they face. It is not a matter of money. This takes us to the other Quid of being an astronaut. While other professions with similar salaries, let’s put A bank workeror a notary, they allow working in comfortable environments without exposure to mortal hazards, space exploration implies isolation, uncertainty and constant risk. And, even so, many astronauts choose this race. The key seems clear: they do it by pure vocation and passion for space, rather than for economic reasons. Being Astronaut is still a dream of childhood for many. In fact, A 2019 study De Lego revealed that more than 10% of children in the United States and the United Kingdom continued to aspire to become astronauts, despite the rise of new professions such as digital content creators. For Williams and Wilmore, the possibility of contributing to space exploration and scientific research surely exceeds any financial sacrifice. It is not a wait, it is a mission. In addition, we must understand that, throughout their stay in the US, Williams and Wilmore not only expected their return home, but actively worked in the maintenance and improvement of the station. Nine months give a lot, and there they were with tasks such as inspection and repair of hardware, loading of loading and supplies, support of scientific experiments and technological demonstrations, configuration of a new air lock system or with physical activity tests in microgravity. In summary, his time in orbit contributed to NASA’s scientific knowledge and the maintenance of the EEI as a key center for space exploration. Resistance and commitment. No doubt, for many of us the simple idea of ​​being stranded in space may seem an unimaginable nightmare. But for astronauts like Williams and Wilmore, it is simply part of the work. According to Ken BowersoxNASA’s Head of Space Operations, astronauts are trained not to focus on when they will return, but in the success of the mission. Perhaps for this reason, and beyond the money they receive, what happened is a good reminder that, in space exploration, motivation and resilience are as important as technology itself. Image | POT In Xataka | “Stranded” astronauts in space say goodbye to the ISS with a script turn: supporting Elon Musk’s version In Xataka | The soap opera is over: the “stranded” astronauts in space have returned to Earth nine months later

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.