Mercadona invests heavily in AI. And it has an advantage built over 40 years

The general overview. Mercadona has a turnover of 38.8 billion euros annually without being the cheapest supermarket in Spain. The slogan ‘Always Low Prices’ was left behind a long time ago because its focus became different. Their secret today is not in the price, but in constantly anticipating what their customers need. Now it wants to scale that capability with AI. Why is it important. Sergio Pajares, the company’s Director of Technology, sums it up bluntly in statements to The Spanish: The company does not seek to have AI for the sake of having it, but rather to develop “the best AI to sell lettuce.” A way to make it clear that they do not want a simple technological showcase, but rather tools that solve tangible problems of daily business. The context. Mercadona has been optimizing its supply chain for forty years and accumulating knowledge about what works in its stores and logistics blocks. That advantage built year after year is what now powers its AI models. It is not about integrating any API and bragging about innovation, but about training systems that understand the internal reality of the company. In detail. The company has developed an AI tool applied to product master data, the heart of its system. Automate the generation of information when new assortment arrives. And it detects inconsistencies that could break the chain: from label errors to coding mismatches. Pajares defends that therein lies the competitive difference: “There are very advanced models to program applications, but none natively understands how software is developed within a specific company.” The key is that the AI ​​knows and interprets Mercadona’s own context, in this case. Between the lines. The strategy has two speeds. For business processes, such as planning employee vacations that do not compromise operational continuity, the company trains its own models. For more standard tasks, such as automatically recognizing supplier invoices, use off-the-shelf generative AI, while maintaining flexibility to switch suppliers when appropriate. Yes, but. Mercadona does not want technological disorder. It has defined an internal strategy that standardizes developments, guarantees common practices in quality and security, and prevents each team from creating its own isolated solutions. “AI cannot grow in a disorderly manner,” insists Pajares. This last point is key: in many companies, AI has been assumed as an engine that each team executes independentlyoften with different tools between teams, complements disconnected from each other. Mercadona seeks that cohesion between departments. The background. Pajares is clear: it is not about having the best algorithm in the world, but about knowing where to apply it. “In technology we tend to fall in love with the algorithm; in real life, intelligence lies in knowing where to apply it,” according to The Spanish. Mercadona’s bet is to predict demand with more precision than anyone else. Four decades of data on purchasing behavior, product rotation and logistics efficiency are your moat particular. And AI amplifies that advantage. In Xataka | Mercadona grows, but the “shopkeeper” model is dead: Spain has lost 142,000 businesses in 10 years Featured image | Mercadona

It is the spatial power that less invests in defense

Every time we look at the GPS of the car, we consult the time or pay by card, the navigation, observation or time synchronization satellites make it Everything works without us noticing. But hundreds of kilometers on our heads, a silent war makes its way. One that, to end up exploding, could erase what we take for granted. The Ukraine War changed everything. He demonstrated, without a doubt, that satellites are not only scientific or commercial tools, but first -order military assets. From the tracking of the troops to the safe and resilient communicationsthe conflict “consecrated space as an operational domain of full right”, In the words of Vincent ChusseauHead of the French Space Command. At the same time, the Russian Invasion of Ukraine put on the table the advances in countermeasures to neutralize or interfere with enemy satellite signalsas well as the Fragility of a nation that does not have sovereign access to space. The space has been militarized. It is a documented reality. Reports like him Space Threat Assessment 2025 of the CSIS or the GLOBAL COUNTSPACE CAPABILITIES From the Secure World Foundation they draw a disturbing panorama: United States, China, Russia, Iran, Israel and other powers They have actively developed an entire anti-satellite capabilities. These technologies range from missiles launched from land to satellites capable of attacking others, going through high -power lasers to fry the electronic components in orbit. Advances are added to electronic warfare that we have also seen in Ukraine in the form of usual cyber attacks or interferences. Europe is staying behind. There are more than 200 anti-satellite weapons in space. For Europe it is a problem. While the United States and China treat space as a pillar of your national securityallocating 50% of public spending on defense space, Europe barely allocates 15%, Josef Aschbacher warnsdirector of the European Space Agency. The remaining 85% is dedicated to civil purposes, which raises a review of strategic priorities. While one of Aschbacher’s papers is to get more financing from the Member States, divergence attracts attention to the times. The European quota in global spatial financing is increasingly lower: only 10% in 2024, compared to 60% of the United States. Not only because other powers have joined the game, such as China and India, but because the EU invests only 0.07% of its GDP in space activities. The participation of Europe is less and less in a sector that expects to triple its value from here to 2035. At risk of losing autonomy. Europe has been moving chips so as not to depend on foreign powers for its own safety and the operation of essential services that depend on space, such as investment in the incipient sector of European microlanzores or the creation of Iris2 as a sovereign alternative to Starlink. But geopolitical instability and growing threats could force it to make more forceful decisions. European defense companies that are already expanding to the space sector do so without a common vision. The solution proposed by Aschbacher is a significant increase in the ESA budget, that could leave the European Rearme Plan. And another more pragmatic route: bet on dual -use space systems: Develop technologies and satellites that can meet both civil needs (science, observation of the earth, the Internet …) and defense (surveillance, safe communications …). Convert the need into opportunity. Image | That, Freepik In Xataka | The US has no doubt: Russia is building a nuclear weapon capable of destroying all satellites in orbit

Europe needs an alternative to Starlink and Spain has just invests 14 million in its first piece: Sateliot

The gigantic Starlink satellite constellation has left Europe at strategic disadvantageas the Ukraine War demonstrated since its inception. In the new geopolitical context of Rearme, and while the European space industry seeks to become independent from the United States, Spain has decided to take care of one of its key assets in the low terrestrial orbit. The news. The Spanish government has approved A strategic investment of 13.85 million euros in Sateliot, The Catalan 5G satellite company for the Internet of Things. The investment will leave the European funds Next Tech (of the recovery plan, transformation and resilience), managed by the Spanish Society for Technological Transformation (SETT). Although the State I already participated in Sateliot Through the Public Company Sepides (with 4.69% of the capital), this investment 10 times greater reinforces the position of Spain prior to the development of IRIS2, the future European Starlink. What is Sateliot. Founded in 2018 by Jaume Sanpera (CEO) and Marco Guadalupi (CTO), Sateliot operates a constellation nanosatellites which offer 5G connectivity for the Internet of things from the low terrestrial orbit. These cubesats operate 600 km altitude and can connect any IoT device compatible with the standard “Rela 17” NTN. Sateliot is not a broadband service such as Starlink, but points to a thousand millionaire business: eliminating areas without cellular coverage for agriculture (irrigation devices, fertilizers), livestock (animal geolocation), logistics (trucks and ships), industrial infrastructure and renewable energy. Small satellites, huge expectations. Sateliot has launched six small cubesat satellites in orbits of about 600 km altitude, but projects to expand its constellation 250 satellites in 2026 to offer almost global coverage. The company has signed commercial contracts with companies such as Telefónica or Amazon Web Services, with which it plans to invoice 270 million euros a year. His forecast is reach income of one billion euros Annual for 2030. Integrated with terrestrial networks. Satelliot technology takes advantage of the 5G standard so that the IoT devices of its customers can connect directly to the satellites without specific equipment. Your customers or those of the operatorsbecause technology is integrated directly into land networks so that devices have continuous connectivity in remote or rural areas without stable terrestrial coverage. In this way, farmers can optimize the use of water and fertilizers to reduce costs. and industries such as logistics will be able to have a real -time monitoring of containers and goods. The way to Iris2. Sateliot acts as Precursor and strategic complement of the future IRIS2 European system, planned for 2030 with a public and private investment of 10,000 million euros. Iris2 is the European response Starlink, a constellation of satellites in different orbits that will initially offer sovereign communications for the Member States and their NATO partners, and will be expanded with commercial services or agglutinating other existing ones, such as Oneweb of the French Eutelsat. The Spanish Hispasat is another of the companies that leads the effort. A compartmentalized Starlink. Sateliot and Oneweb are somehow pieces of the future European Starlink, but cannot compete on the Starlink is far from what the European industry can offer right now. While Sateliot as Oneweb deployed their satellites (hiring Falcon 9 rockets, among others), Spacex has built in just over a year its first direct-to-cell constellation with LTE connectivity for all types of customers. The system He began to deploy In January 2024 and It is already working in the United States In beta phase, integrated with T-Mobile. Europe is aware of this resource difference, and is putting its eggs in many baskets. Part of the Strategy 2040 of ESA It is to support the development of these constellations and achieve autonomy in access to space with new commercial rockets that aspire to be reuse. Image | Sateliot In Xataka | Spacex has launched 8,000 Starlink satellites in five years, but they are not enough. And we are beginning to understand why

The next phase of AI is not to see who invests more but who invests less

The hole that the Hype Deepseek has caused Nvidia to assess (half billion dollars and climbing) It is somewhat deeper than a simple market adjustment: it is the end of an era in the AI ​​industry. Success can no longer be measured in invested dollars. Why is it important. Until now, the dominant narrative in AI has been very simple: More money = better models. This equation has promoted stratospheric assessments and has justified mass investments such as The Stargate project and his half billion. Deepseek has just demonstrated that this logic begins to become obsolete. The contrast. OpenAI invests hundreds of millions of dollars in each iteration of GPT. Goal has dedicated billions to flame, also open source (With nuances), without leading in performance. Deepseek has achieved equivalent or higher results with 5.6 million dollars. Efficiency has triumphed over financial muscle. Even if the 5.6 million have an extensive small print and the real cost is higher, that does not cancel its milestone in efficiency. Between the lines. The market reaction, with generalized collapses in technological beyond Nvidia, reinforces the change of paradigm. Not only is Depseek built a good model, it has shown that the emperor is naked. Huge investments in AI infrastructure, after all, could be based on erroneous assumptions about the relationship between spending and performance. The money trail. The technical innovation of Deepseek –su architecture of ‘mixed experts‘or its reduced precision system – are a signal: the future of AI does not go through larger data centers, but make them smarter and more efficient. And leave the great technological position on the other side of the Pacific: How to justify multimillion -dollar investments when a rival gets similar results with a cost fraction? What happens to valuations based on the assumption that AI requires continuous mass investments? Are they sustainable The margins of Nvidia In AI chips if the trend is towards efficiency? Yes, but. Not everything is efficiency. The great will argue that their massive investments are justified by the need for scale and reliability. Even here Deepseek poses more uncomfortable questions: are they really necessary 100,000 GPUS To train a good model … or have we been waste resources due to lack of innovation? The next. The market is going to reassess the entire AI value chain. If the models can train with a fraction of the expected cost, what does that mean to …? Chips manufacturers such as NVIDIA and AMD. Infrastructure suppliers Cloud. Startups that have raised billions based on mass investment projections. Even for projections of Energy consumption by AI training. The next phase of the AI ​​race may not be measured in Teraflops or in model sizes, but in innovations that improve efficiency. The race is no longer to see who can spend more, but to see who can spend less while getting more. The arrival of Deepseek marks a milestone and the beginning of an era: one in which the competitive advantage will not come for having the deepest pocket, but the smartest idea. This horse drop is already half a billion of dollars for Wall Street. For now. Outstanding image | Xataka with Mockuuuups Studio In Xataka | Deepseek is the fashion model. The problem is that nobody knows very well what you are doing with our data

Google invests another $1 billion in Anthropic, according to FT. Having a plan B was never a bad idea

In 2021, several former OpenAI employees decided to set it up on their own. Among them were siblings Daniela and Dario Amodei, who led the founding of Anthropic. Since then, their work at Claude in particular and in artificial intelligence has made them leaders in the sector. So much so that even Google, which has its own AI project, opted for them. And now they have done it again. First investments. In April 2023, with the relatively recent release of ChatGPT, invested 400 million dollars in Anthropic. That number would end up going up up to 2 billion in total at the end of that year, which consolidated the promising commitment to this AI startup. Another 1 billion. As indicated Financial TimesGoogle has invested another $1 billion in Anthropic. The data comes from people related to the movement, and the operation—if confirmed—would allow Google to reinforce its participation in the company. Rival and plan B. Claude is a fantastic AI chatbot that has been gaining popularity in recent months and is now one of the benchmarks, but it rivals Gemini, Google’s model and chatbot. It is a unique situation in which Google has Anthropic as a rival but also as a potential ally if needed. Diversifying is always a good idea. As pointed out in the FT, this operation allows Google to diversify its interests and not put all its eggs in the same basket. And Anthropic expects more financial support. According to this newspaper, Anthropic is about to close a separate investment round of another $2 billion. Lightspeed Venture Partners would participate in it. This round is expected to triple Anthropic’s valuation and place it at around $60 billion. Amazon, even more relevant. Google’s investment is already very relevant, but Amazon is the main protagonist here. The company led by Andy Jassy has invested $8 billion in the startup, and Claude models are expected to end up being an integral part of the future version of Alexa that keeps delaying again and again. They already have gas for one season. These investments will allow Anthropic to continue advancing the development of its AI models. The “Computer Use” function presented at the end of October 2024 showed a future potential full of AI agents to do things for us on the computer, and the firm certainly seems to be heading in the right direction in this area. Image | Xataka In Xataka | Generative AI seems stagnant. Big Tech believes they have an ace up their sleeve: “agents” that do things for us

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.