income

Minimum income and other conditions for this 2026

by

Let’s clarify the minimum income to file the income tax returnso you can know if you have to do it or not. Because there are some cases in which if your income is not much, you will be exempt from doing it. As usual, if you have collected more than certain amounts During the last tax year, you will have to file the declaration. It is not a fixed amount, because it depends on whether you have only one or more than one payer. Remember that according to the Income calendarthe campaign starts on April 8 Who doesn’t have to pay the rent? We are going to tell you the limits of income from work below which you do not have the obligation to file the Income Tax return, unless it is one of the cases that we will tell you later and which are always obligated. These limits are for those hired as employees. If you have only had one payer: If in total you earned less than 22,000 euros gross per year, you are not obliged to declare the income. If you have had two or more payers: When you have had several payers and the second and remaining one has paid you more than 1,500 euros, the limit for not having the obligation to declare drops to 15,876 euros gross per year. If the second payer or any of the remaining ones has not paid you more than 1,500 euros, then the limit is still 22,000 In addition to these limits, starting with the 2025 Income that we will make in 2026, the obligation to make the income for those who receive non-contributory benefits or subsidies from the SEPE is supplemented. This exception is only if you have no other sources of income such as rents or profits on the stock market, which will force you to account with the Treasury. Other income beyond work In addition to your salary, there are other types of income that may force you to declare or that they can exempt you if you do not exceed certain amounts, as long as one of the previous conditions is not also met. They are the following: Full income from movable capital (dividends, interest on accounts, deposits, investment funds, prizes) subject to withholding or deposit into accounts. The limit below which you do not have to make the declaration is 1,600 eurosand if you exceed it you will have to declare. Imputed real estate income, public aid and subsidies for the purchase of housing must be declared if they exceed the 1,000 euros. Asset losses greater than 500 euros They also require declaration. If you are below these amounts, you will not have the obligation for this reason. Who has an obligation ALWAYS and without exception And just as we have told you what can make you exempt from filing your income tax return, now we will tell you in which cases it will be mandatory do it. They are the following: Self-employed: Any self-employed worker will always have to file an income tax return, regardless of their income level. Minimum Vital Income (IMV): People who receive the Minimum Living Income must always submit the income tax return, even if they do not exceed the general limits. Also the rest of the people in the coexistence unit. Food annuities: Those who receive annuities for food that are not exempt, or when the payer of work income is not obliged to withhold. For example, in the case of separation or divorce, if the child receives maintenance annuities from the parents by virtue of a court decision or the regulatory agreement. In Xataka Basics | IRPF withholding calculator 2025: how to use it online to know your minimum withholding recommended by the Treasury

Donating cash to children is exempt from personal income tax for parents. It is not free for children

by

Young people do not have it easy to get ahead in a context of very tight salaries and with him housing prices skyrocketed. Therefore, helping children or a family member financially becomes the natural impulse. However, this willingness to help may have tax consequences What is important to know before making the transfer. In a binding query Addressed to the General Directorate of Taxes (DGT), a body dependent on the Treasury, a person raised the possibility of helping his family financially through a cash donation. The consultation made it abundantly clear: anyone who donates cash has nothing to fear on their tax return. The same cannot be said about the person who receives it. ​What the Treasury says about the donor’s personal income tax. The General Directorate of Taxes responded to a person who wanted to donate cash to his mother. The DGT pulled the file and argued its response in a previous binding consultation, in which a father raised the tax consequences of donating cash to his children. The Treasury’s response establishes that “for the donation of money, no capital gain or loss will be computed for the donor,” which implies that on the part of the person who gives that money there is nothing to declare or pay in the Income Tax. The technical reasoning is quite logical and simple. When money is donated, there is no difference between the value at which it was acquired and the value at which it is transmitted, so there is no alteration in the donor’s assets that justifies paying taxes on it, as established in article 33.1 of the Law on Personal Income Tax. When the gift is not money, the story changes. The organization itself takes advantage of the consultation to remember that the exemption from personal income tax taxation Applies exclusively to cash donations. That means that if parents They donate a home to their children that they bought 20 years ago for 100,000 euros, and that at the time of donation its value is 200,000 euros, must pay personal income tax for that increase of 100,000 euros in its value between the date of purchase and the donation. The same occurs with shares or other assets with market value that may increase in value between the purchase price and the donation price. The most curious thing is that this principle does not apply in the same way if that same property had lost value since its purchase, the donor would not be able to deduct that loss. Children do pay the Gift Tax. It should be noted that the fact that the father does not pay personal income tax for that donation does not mean that the transfer of assets has no consequences for the person who receives it. The child who receives the money is obliged to declare the donation and settle the Inheritance and Donation Tax. This tax falls on the person who receives the donation, not on the donor. The amount to be paid for the child or family member depends on factors such as the amount received, the degree of relationship and, above all, the autonomous community where the recipient resides for tax purposes. Depending on what requirements are met, the amount to pay may be close to zero euros, but it is necessary to complete the procedure. If the donation is not declared within the established period, the Treasury may impose penalties and interest. A tax that depends on the communities. The Inheritance and Donation Tax is partially transferred to the autonomous communities, which means that each community sets its own bonuses, reductions and tax rates. This generates very notable differences between paying this tax in one community or another. Madrid and Andalusia, for example, apply a 99% bonus on donations between parents and children, which in practice means that the recipient barely pays taxes when making this type of donation. At the opposite extreme, communities such as Catalonia or the Valencian Community have more demanding tax systems, with progressive rates and fewer bonuses. A particularly striking case is that of Extremadura, which has extended the exemption up to 200,000 euros in donations for children to buy their first home. In Xataka | The Great Wealth Transfer: the movement from boomers to millennials that will transfer millions between generations Image | Pexels (Kaboompics.com)

In Ireland they fear that artists will go without food because of AI. So he’s going to give them a basic income.

by

The AI ​​is putting into serious doubt the continuity of different sectors as varied as the programmersthe music producerscinema and even illustrators. Creating a painting, a song, a video clip or an app used to involve having talent and the necessary knowledge. Now it is enough to choose the right AI model. A few days ago, the United Kingdom government was considering the possibility of implement a universal basic income to alleviate the effects of AI. The Irish government has gone ahead of them and has already launched an initiative in which it provides a basic monthly income to 2,000 artists. According to an official report of the impact of the measure, each public euro contributed to this basic income generates 1.39 euros of return. A test that is consolidated. In 2022, Ireland launched a pilot project of universal basic income for artists with which it sought to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the cultural industry. The test turned out to be an unexpected success, so the Irish Administration has chosen to consolidate it by turning the Basic Income for the Arts into a tool against the precariousness of artists, and prevent them from abandoning their creative work. for economic reasons. According what was published by EFEthe Irish executive has provided the project with a budget item of 18.27 million euros so that 2,000 artists benefit from a payment of 325 euros per week. “This is an important milestone for the arts in Ireland and how we support them,” said Patrick O’Donovan, Ireland’s Minister for Arts and Culture. “Ireland is a world leader in supporting artists thanks to the BIA (Basic Income for the Arts),” he added in the official statement of the measure. A test that was a success. The pilot program started in November 2022 after the pandemic, selecting 2,000 artists from 9,025 applications through a lottery to avoid bias. Each one received 325 euros net per week for 36 months, equivalent to 16,900 euros per year, tax-free and without working conditions. The composition reflected the diversity of the sector: 707 in visual arts such as painters and sculptors, 584 musicians and composers, 204 filmmakers and audiovisuals, 170 writers and poets, 160 in theater and dance, plus 175 in mixed areas such as design or performance. This randomized design allowed us to measure real effects without bias for successful profiles. The pilot test was subjected to a study constant from independent entities, which were able to measure the benefits of the measure. The pilot demonstrated with data that 325 euros per week was enough to cover part of the basic expenses, freeing up to 25 extra hours per week so that the artists could dedicate time to creating. That is, it was low enough to allow artists to dedicate time to their artistic production, but not so low as to make them dependent on it. It is a basic income, but with conditions. The measure allows maintaining the same economic conditions as the 2022 program, but incorporates a series of conditions that avoid dependency by assigning it to alternative three-year periods. That is, the beneficiaries of the income in the 2026-2029 cycle cannot opt ​​for the 2029-2032 cycle, but they are eligible again for the 2032-2035 cycle. In addition, at the end of each cycle, there is a gradual three-month decrease in income, where the payment drops by 25% per month to facilitate the transition until they stop receiving it. More art, less precariousness. The more consolidated results of the pilot test published in September 2025, indicated that the initial investment in the project was 105 million euros, of which only 72 million were executed. However, that was enough to obtain a return of around 80 million euros. The artists who participated in the test increased their monthly income by an average of 500 euros, while their income from non-artistic activities was reduced by an average of 280 euros. That is, the basic income allowed artists to concentrate on their creations and make them profitable, allowing them live from his art and not from precarious or part-time jobs. “The economic return on this investment in Ireland’s artists and creative arts workers is having an immediate positive impact for the sector and the economy in general,” said the Irish culture minister. In Xataka | Barcelona tested a basic income of 1,297 euros per month and the job search was reduced by 22%: the test was a success Image | Unsplash (Dillon Wanner)

Elon Musk and Sam Altman predicted that AI will force the establishment of a universal basic income. The United Kingdom is already considering it

by

The main economic organizations in the world they don’t agree in their forecasts about what the real impact of the arrival of AI will be in the economic and labor sphere. A report The World Economic Forum estimated that AI will create 170 million new jobs. The problem is that until that happens, it will destroy about 92 million jobs. The US Senate consider that some 100 million jobs could be destroyed. Elon Musk and Sam Altman have repeated on several occasions that, to minimize this impact on society, it will be necessary to implement a universal basic income. In the United Kingdom, the government is debating measures to protect workers with the same idea. Millionaires ask for a basic income. Some of the top AI millionaires, such as Elon Musk, have predicted that universal basic income will be a reality in a future dominated by AI. While it is true that Musk’s vision is based on a vision more optimistic about the future in which “work will be optional” and it will not be necessary to save for retirement, the millionaire does not deny that universal income will be a necessary instrument to achieve it. Along the same lines, although with a more realistic vision, the CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, has funded studies on the effects of universal basic income in a scenario of job destruction and how this income helps recipients return to work train for new jobs. Companies do not need human labor. In one your blog postDario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, warned that AI will have an “unusually painful” impact on the labor market. “AI is not a substitute for specific human jobs, but rather a general job substitute for humans,” the manager wrote. For this reason, this mechanism is increasingly seen as a transition instrument that allows employees laid off due to the arrival of AI to retrain to re-enter the labor market. A systematic review of the Department of Economics of the University of Huelva on more than 50 empirical casespoint out that universal basic income improves spending on basic needs without participants stopping looking for work, so it will be a way for employees to train for new jobs. jobs created by AI. The UK Government is debating it. In an interview for Financial TimesJason Stockwood, UK Investment Minister, has revealed that within the Government “it is definitely being talked about.” The minister noted that “without a doubt, we are going to have to think very carefully about how to smooth the process of disembarking those industries that disappear, through some type of UBI and some type of lifelong learning mechanism so that people can retrain.” According to published BloombergMorgan Stanley declared a net job loss of 8% in the UK in the last 12 months due to AI, the highest among large economies. Which explains the concern of the British executive to begin evaluating formulas that cushion this impact. A lifeline to keep them afloat. Unlike Musk’s “optimistic” vision, British representatives do not see the arrival of AI as a liberating element that makes work optional, but as a problem that will temporarily leave millions of workers who will need help unemployed. So declared it Sadiq Khan, mayor of London, concerned about the high rate of “white collar” unemployment that can cause the arrival of AI in a city like London. Liz Kendall, Secretary of Technology of the United Kingdom, spoke along the same lines, assuring that, although it is true that more jobs will be created than will be lost, there will be a transition period in which AI will be “a weapon of mass destruction of jobs. We will not leave people and communities to fend for themselves,” collected Guardian. The million-dollar question: who finances that income? It is easy to predict that universal basic income would be a solution for those who do not have a job to return to because AI has automated it. However, something more complicated will be determining who will finance that basic income. Bill Gates already gave some clues almost a decade agoensuring that they should be their own companies that use robots in their processes those that pay for that subsidy “if a robot replaces the work of a human, that robot must pay taxes like a human.” Ioana Marinescu, economist and associate professor of public policy at the University of Pennsylvania consider that taxing technology companies could slow down their implementation at the local level, so that this transformation process it would be more progressive increasing that transition period that would give time to the labor market to adapt. In Xataka | AI and its impact on the labor market: how the perception of its arrival varies by country, explained in a graph Image | Unsplash (Alexander Gray, enrico bet)

Dates and when the 2026 Income Tax return is made

by

Let’s tell you what they are the dates of the 2025 income tax returnthe campaign that will take place during 2026. We say that it is Income 2025 even if it is done this year because what we will do in it is regularize and account for the last fiscal year. In this article we are going to tell you what they are the most important dates of this next Income campaign. For example, we will tell you when you can start checking your tax details or request your reference number, and also when declarations can be made. There are still a couple of dates that have not been revealed, such as the consultation of tax data or the request for your reference number. But when they are announced we will update it so that you have all the data. Income tax return dates 2025 These are the main dates of the Income Tax 2025 What you should keep in mind so that you don’t miss deadlines. It is important that you remember that the income campaign this year ends a day early than last year, because it will also start a day earlier. Tax data consultation: Unannounced, but possibly mid-March. Reference number request: Unannounced, but possibly mid-March. Income tax return online: You can do it from April 8 to June 30, 2026. Income tax return by phone: You can do it from May 6 to June 30, 2026. In-person income tax return: You can do it from June 1 to June 30, 2025. And now, we are going to tell you How can you request an appointment? for telephone and in-person income. Appointment for telephone statement: You can request an appointment to make your declaration by phone, calling the numbers 91 535 73 26 / 901 12 12 24 or 91 553 00 71 / 901 22 33 44. You can do so from May 6 to June 30, 2026. Appointment for in-person declaration: You can request an appointment to make your declaration in person, by calling the numbers 91 535 73 26 / 901 12 12 24 or 91 553 00 71 / 901 22 33 44. You can request the necessary appointment from May 29 to June 29, In Xataka Basics | IRPF withholding calculator 2025: how to use it online to know your minimum withholding recommended by the Treasury

Tesla is pivoting to turn its cars into a side business. The reason: their income falls by 61%

by

The Tesla Model S and Model X are incredible cars. Get them while they’re still available! With these phrases, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, has accompanied the company’s announcement in X in which they point out that during the next quarter they will reduce their production of the Tesla Model S and Model To its credit, the company will produce Optimus robots. by surprise. It was known that Elon Musk has been pushing for some time for Tesla to increase its investments in artificial intelligence and robots, either in humanoid form like Optimus or through its robotaxis for autonomous driving. But what we did not expect is that this bet would displace two of its most iconic models. And the company will stop producing its Tesla Model S, its first sedan, and the Model X, its first SUV, in Freemont (California) to make way for the production of Optimus robots. The company closes a chapter by recognizing that “Tesla would not be what it is today” without these cars. In Xataka Tesla wanted to make 20 million cars in 2030. The reality in 2025 is that Tesla has crashed and BYD is already leading A paradigm shift. The decision to invest in this factory to increase robot production is more than just a redistribution of its efforts, it is confirmation of a change in strategy in the company. Musk seeks invest $2 billion in xAIthe company dedicated exclusively to artificial intelligence. Intertwining your companies is one of the obsessions from the CEO of Tesla so that some feed each other. xAI is key to power and improve Grok which, in turn, is already included in Tesla vehicles as an artificial intelligence assistant. At the same time, xAI is also decisive for the functioning of its robotaxisthe cabin without wheels or steering wheel that Tesla wants to put on the street to offer a completely autonomous taxi service. In Xataka Tesla can’t wait for us to take our hands off the wheel. We have tried it and we have opinions More than complicated numbers. Optimus has left many doubts and Musk himself has confirmed that he expects a slow deployment. However, dedicating a plant that only manufactured a handful of cars is not only confirmation that the company does not care in the least about killing a product if it understands that it is not profitable or that its future is much less interesting than a new bet. Changing the use of the factory is also a necessity. And the numbers presented by Tesla are something much more than complicated: Net profit has gone from 7.1 billion to 3.8 billion dollars, 45% less. In the last quarter, turnover has fallen from $2.1 billion last year to $840 million. It is a drop of 61%. The company has delivered 1.64 million cars in 2025 in what is its second year reducing its sales. In the United States the drop in sales is 7%, according to Cox Automotive, reported in The New York Times.  In the same period, it is estimated that BYD has sold 2.25 million cars Purely electric. In Xataka The Tesla Cybertruck is such a sales failure that Elon Musk has only found one solution: buy them from himself Loss of identity. The Tesla Model S and Model X have become residual cars for the company since the Model 3 and Model Y occupied the bulk of sales. Both are very expensive cars that cost around or exceed 100,000 euros. Both the saloon and the SUV served the brand to boost your image and personality as unique cars. Over the years, that has been lost. And the huge screens that previously surprised now do not stand out in a market that has turned to trying turn the cabin into a multimedia centerespecially in China. Your own assembly line has been forced to keep its design unchangedwhich has made them lose freshness. The popularization of its Tesla Model 3 and Model Y has popularized access to the company, making them lose part of that desirable car aura. {“videoId”:”x9tnvi4″,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Why YOUR NEXT CAR WILL SURELY BE CHINESE”, “tag”:”Webedia-prod”, “duration”:”614″} A cut production. The decline in sales has led to declining production of both models. To give us an idea, nothing is better than the data provided by the company itself: 2022: 71,777 units produced and 66,705 deliveries 2023: 70,826 units produced and 68,874 deliveries 2024: 94,105 units produced and 85,133 deliveries* 2025: 53,900 units produced and 50,850 deliveries* Starting in 2024, Tesla accounts for the production and deliveries of the Tesla Model S, Model X and Cybertruck in the same item. That’s whyCybertruck sales are estimates outside of Tesla The Tesla Model 3 and Model Y Standard confirms a story. The story of what I want and I can’t of Tesla’s 25,000 euro car In Xataka The Tesla Model 3 and Model Y Standard confirms a story. The story of what I want and I can’t of Tesla’s 25,000 euro carThe limits . Tesla is in a stagnant situation with its electric cars. The company stepped on the accelerator in 2024 to remain the best-selling electric car brand in the world and improve the previous year’s data. But it did not succeed, going from 1.85 million cars produced and 1.81 million cars delivered in 2023 to 1.77 million units produced and 1.79 million cars deliveredin 2024 . Year in which, in addition, They increased their range with the Cybertruck which started at a very good pace. The company, therefore, needs to kill some very expensive cars that are barely generating a positive impact on its accounts no matter how high the profit margin obtained with each unit. To begin with, because the company needs a boost from its investors, who seem to support these decisions. And, second, because we have to see if the company has not already peaked in its vehicle sales. At leastwith its particular way of producing cars with huge presses that are only profitable by manufacturing millions and … Read more

What you have is a very serious income problem.

by

China has established itself as one of the driving forces of artificial intelligence, both in adoption and integration of new functions, but the economic balance tells a different story. Its ecosystem grows outward, not upward: it accumulates use, but not income. This divergence between scale and return, increasingly visible in the compared data, explains why the main challenge for Chinese AI is not how much it invests, but how much it manages to earn. The figures and trends we use come from sources that work with updated data series: Stanford University’s global investment tracker and the Tech Buzz China report with Unique Researchwhich examines the performance of Chinese products and companies during 2024 and 2025. Their combination allows us to understand not only how much China is progressing in AI, but also how it is positioned against other markets. The contrast between powers. Stanford University figures for 2024 place global corporate investment in AI at $252.3 billion, in a context of growing demand for these technologies. The United States led with 109.1 billion in private investment, a volume almost twelve times greater than that of China, which stood at 9.3 billion. The data illustrates the magnitude of the gap and the determining weight that American private financing has in the development of AI on an international scale. AI business metrics. To understand the performance of any AI application, it is worth looking at the ARR. This metric reflects the recurring income that a company obtains in a year, a key indicator to evaluate the solidity of its economic model. Unique Research places only four Chinese firms among the 100 private AI companies with the highest ARR: glory reaches 173 million dollars, PLAUD 125 million, ByteDance 116 million and Zuoyebang 33 million. Together they add up to 447 million dollars, 1.23% of the total list, which amounts to 36.4 billion. Compared to that figure, American companies concentrate practically all of the recurring income, which marks a clear difference in scale and commercial maturity. Glority and the piece that fits the context. The name Glority may not sound familiar to you, and that’s completely normal. Most likely, you have ever seen PictureThisits plant identification application that has become the reference in its category. The company was born in 2009 and began working with computer vision models long before the recent rise of AI after 2022. Its trajectory helps to understand how some Chinese companies have grown by combining everyday utility and a technical base developed long in advance. PLAUD and its double anchor: Shenzhen and the United States. Although it appears on the Unique Research list within the Chinese group, Its founder assures that PLAUD operates as a US company. Xu opened an office in San Francisco in 2023, works from there with part of the team and registered the company in Delaware, storing data in Amazon centers in the United States. He himself summarizes its structure like this: “we have the best talent in Shenzhen for hardware design and the best engineers in San Francisco for AI development.” A huge user base. The report figures at 4.78 billion the aggregate monthly active users of the top 100 AI companies as of August 2025. Of these, about 2.2 billion belong to Chinese platforms, around 46% of the total. Baidu, ByteDance, DeepSeekMeitu and Zuoyebang top that list thanks to their presence on multiple daily services. The breadth of its portfolios and continuous integration of AI tools allow its reach to be significantly greater than other markets. Predominance of the visual. In China, many of the most widely used AI applications revolve around the creation and editing of content, from video to photography, including retouching and digital makeup tools. This orientation responds to deeply rooted habits in the country. The result is a powerful visual ecosystem, although less present in business or productivity services, which usually provide more stable income. Where opportunities are concentrated outside China. The report indicates that, on an international scale, the growth of AI is divided into categories linked to daily work: support, development, infrastructure, productivity and improved search. This group includes products developed outside of China, such as ChatGPT, Cursor, Suno either Perplexitywhich are integrated into professional processes where continuity and recurring payment are common. Faced with this diversity, the visual specialization of the Chinese ecosystem occupies a more limited space. An obvious commercial paradox. The Chinese AI ecosystem is built on a huge domestic market, and most companies develop their products with that audience in mind. The report identifies hundreds of startups focused primarily on local users, a strategy that takes advantage of both the country’s scale and its pace of technological adoption. However, when the products that generate the most recurring income are analyzed, those that invoice in international markets predominate. Of the 23 Chinese products present in the top 100 by ARR, 19 earn their main income outside of China. The conclusion is clear: use is concentrated within the country, but the capacity for sustained monetization continues to come from abroad. Achilles heel. By relying on foreign markets to sustain their recurring revenues, Chinese AI companies operate under a higher level of uncertainty than their global competitors. Restrictions associated with “national security,” app bans, and trade measures between countries have become more common, and each of them can limit your international presence. If any of these barriers affected products that are currently monetized abroad, the drop in income would be difficult to avoid. The picture left by the figures is clear: China has built a broad ecosystem, although its income structure continues to depend enormously on foreign sources. The question is no longer how much you invest, but how you convert that effort into lasting results inside and outside the country. The challenge is to consolidate a model that can be sustained beyond reach and that resists an international environment marked by tensions and changing regulations. Images | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 In Xataka | DeepSeek has broken its silence after months without appearing: its … Read more

The reactive the great debate on universal basic income. And the question is whether it is feasible to create it: Crossover 1×23

by

One hears about Universal basic rent and inevitably thinks that It’s money that gives you free. The idea goes far beyond that, but one thing is true: with the rise of AI and the potential revolution of robotics, the debate about this option is more rising than ever. And precisely this 1×23 crossover is dedicated to talking about universal basic income, its origins and what it means. And to do so are Jaume Lahoz and Carlos Santa Engracia, presenters of Crossover, and a server, Javier Pastor, to dissect the theme. The truth is that we are increasingly facing a future in which AI and automation can help Create ultraproductive companies. In that scenario it is likely that the impact for employment and society will be enormous, and that is where a Universal basic rent You can raise a solution to that “mass and forced unemployment.” In the episode we talk in addition to the Pilot experiments That there has been in various countries, and also how Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, is especially interested in this area through its controversial Worldcoin project. Like everything, in the idea that projects universal basic income there are clear advantages and of course also risks. Will we become a society Like the one painted ‘wall-e’? ¿We will all gorditos And without moving from a chair that levita and takes us everywhere? Phew. On YouTube | Crossover

Palantir is already worth more than Coca-Cola with the tenth of income. Wall Street has lost its head with AI

by

Palantir Technologies has just passed giants such as Samsung, Costco or Coca-Cola, reaching the 411,000 million dollars of stock market capitalization. Why is it important. A company that bills 1,000 million dollars to the quarter is worth more than others that generate ten times greater income. It is the purest manifestation of “Ia washing“What Wall Street consumes. The facts. The data analysis company founded by Peter Thiel in 2003 reported a 48% growth in income to exceed for the first time the 1,000 million quarterly dollars. Their commercial contracts in the United States fired 93%, while the government rose 53%. The benefit grew by 144% to 327 million. In figures. The per (Price to Earnings Ratioprice of the action divided by the benefit of the action) of Palantir reaches 596more than ten times higher than that of Nvidia (57) and almost twenty times Apple’s (31). To justify its current assessment, the company would have to maintain an annual growth of 55% for four consecutive years. Even in that optimistic scenario, it would quote the income of 2029 at 25 times. The context. Wall Street lives a speculative bubble fed by any company that mentions the magical words: ‘artificial intelligence’. Palantir, who for years has been fighting for growing beyond his defense contracts, has reinvented himself as the company that “makes” the AI models in the real world “work. His CEO, Alex Karp, proclamation that “the great language models simply do not work without palantir.” Yes, but. The euphoria hides several problems. The company quotes its future sales to 80 times, a metric that exceeds any historical precedent in the S&P 500. Deutsche Bank, who maintained sale recommendation, admitted that “something special is happening” but recognizes that “the valuation is still very challenging.” It is the same bank as The recommendation has uploaded just not to seem completely out of market reality. Between the lines. Karp used the results conference To attack elite universities and promise that AI will give “super powers” to workers without higher training. A populist speech that fits perfectly with the current political narrative, but that does not justify an assessment that makes Palantir the most overrated company of the most important stock market index in the world. The big question. Can a company that invoice 4,000 million annually the same as Johnson & Johnson, a multinational that generates 85,000 million? Or that Coca-Cola, global icon whose income multiplies by ten? The markets have decided yes, betting that IA will completely transform the economy. Palantir has become the symbol of that bet. With all that that implies when the bubble explodes. Outstanding image | Palantir In Xataka | The seven magnificent face a total war in their own future. And there are three candidates to impose the rest

Ireland tested a basic income of 1,300 euros for 2,000 artists. It has gone so well that now they do not want me to end

by

The last of the experiments we had heard about that idea of ​​receiving money every month without conditions, also called basic income, It happened in Germany. The test consisted of 1,200 euros per month to 122 participants and the results contradicted many of the topics that we usually hear around the proposal. Ireland has been the next stop, about to finish another unprecedented test: basic rent, but for art. A salary for the artist. The story It began in 2022at which time Ireland launched one of the most significant pilot programs of basic income aimed at the cultural sector, granting 2,000 artists and art workers an unconditional weekly income of 325 euros, 1,300 euros per month. For three years, without performance or consideration requirements, these beneficiaries enjoyed unusual economic stability in the artistic world, allowing them to fully focus on their creative work. The initiative, promoted by the then Minister of Culture, Catherine Martinhe was born in response to acute precariousness after the pandemic and was a total investment of 28 million dollars In the sector. Now, as the end of the program approaches in August, the beneficiaries and their defenders face the uncertainty of the return to financial insecurity, while the voices that claim their extension and conversion in a permanent policy of universal basic income grow. Creative freedom. But there is much more. A prepared report By sociologist Jenny Dagg, from the University of Maynooth, collects the testimony of more than 50 participants and reveals deep effects that go far beyond economic relief. Admission allowed artists to experience, assume risks and fail without constant fear of poverty, which raised quality and originality of its production. At the same time, many reported substantial improvements in their Emotional well -beingincluding better sleep, less anxiety and renewed confidence in their professional career. The ability to devote time to thought, research or innovation, before a luxury, became creative routine. For many, the program was the first real opportunity to imagine a long -term viable artistic career, without sacrificing dignity or health. A sociocultural laboratory. He Irish pilot It has also become a world reference in the midst of the growing debate on the future of employment in the face of artificial automation and intelligence. With technological leaders such as Elon Musk and Sam Altman advocating the need for a universal basic income in response to mass labor disruption, the Irish experience It provides concrete evidence that a guaranteed income does not discourage work, but enriches it. While other similar initiatives in the United States or Germany have been more limited, Ireland opted for a sector that, although not always lucrative, is essential for the symbolic and emotional fabric of any society: art. In this context, driving organizations such as Ubi Lab Network either Basic Inome Ireland They argue that no more evidence is needed: the positive impact is already demonstrated. The dilemma of the return. And as in almost all these experiments, there is an end. With the conclusion of the program in sight, many participants They express fear Given the possibility that their progress and stability are faded. The concerns on how to maintain the creative impulse without that economic mattress extend through all artistic disciplines. The Minister of Culture, Patrick O’Donovan, He has recognized The value of the pilot and has promised to thoroughly evaluate its results before proposing new measures, although there is still no certainty about possible extension. Meanwhile, promoters insist that basic income is not only an economic policy, but a essential tool to deal with the multiple crises of the present (economic, social and ecological) returning time, agency and health to those who create, interpret and enrich the cultural life of the nation. Lessons Thus, and although the future of this Irish basic rent It is still uncertain, its impact has already left a fingerprint in the lives of thousands of artists and in the global debate on the value of unconventional work. Far from becoming a mere experiment, the program has shown that giving people a minimum of security can release their maximum potential. If you want also, in a world that is vertiginously approaching a New and unpredictable Technological revolution, the question that Ireland poses is not so much if we can afford to implement a basic income, but, perhaps, if we can really allow ourselves. Image | Pxhere In Xataka | Germany has successfully tested the vital basic income of 1,200 euros: they improved their training and changed jobs In Xataka | Sam Altman has been giving millions of dollars in secret. Its objective: the biggest study on universal basic income

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.