Spacex has finally made public why the last Starship exploded. All rumors were wrong

White and in bottle? Milk. Two Consecutive starships that exploit In the same flight phase, practically in the same minute, in similar ways? Anyone would say that there was a common cause, but it was not so. Context. Spacex has shed light on the explosive loss of Starship During his eighth test flight on March 6. After successfully capturing the Super Heavy propeller, all expectations were set on the ship, which in the previous launch had failed during the ascent phase. After a successful separation and before reaching the necessary altitude to turn off, Spacex detected a flash near one of the central engines of the ship, followed by an “energy event” that made the engine disappear. Shortly after, two other central engines and one of the outer vacuum engines went out, which caused the ship to lose control nine and a half minutes after takeoff. The Starship 34 He disintegrated About the Caribbean. They were not the vibrations. After two consecutive explosions, everyone assumed that the problem had been the same. On flight 7, Starship 33 was lost eight minutes and 20 seconds after takeoff Because of stronger vibrations than expected, that had caused leaks of liquid oxygen and a fire In a non -pressurized area of ​​the lower part of the ship, which Spacex calls the “stern attic”. But it has not been so. “Although the ruling manifested himself at a point similar to that of the seventh flight, it is worth noting that they are clearly different,” Spacex wrote in a recent statement. “The mitigations implemented after flight 7 to solve the problems of harmonic response and flammability of the ship operated by design as planned,” added the company. What arose was a new problem. What happened on flight 8. According to the Spacex statement, the most likely cause of the loss of the ship during the eighth flight was “a hardware failure in one of the central raptor engines of the upper stage of the rocket, which resulted in a mixture and ignition not deliberate of propellents.” In essence, a engine component failed, causing a fuel leak and mixture (liquid methane) with oxidant (liquid oxygen). The consequent explosion destroyed the engine and committed the survival of the ship. Both problems originated in the lower part or stern of Starship, but the failure of flight 7 occurred in the “attic”, and that of flight 8 in the “basement”, the motor bay. All ready for flight 9. To address this new ruling for the ninth flight, Spacex has implemented reinforcements in key starship 35 joints, a new nitrogen purge system and improvements in the propellant drainage system. Later, he plans to introduce the new generation of Raptor 3 engines, with a complete redesign that addresses this type of problem. If there are no more delays, The ninth flight will take off this Tuesday, May 27 At 18:30, local time in Starbase (1:30 on Wednesday in Spain). It will be The first to reuse a super heavy propeller; Specifically, Booster 14, which flew in the seventh mission. The ship, on the other hand, will try again the objectives not achieved on flights 7 and 8, such as the deployment of eight Starlink satellit simulators and multiple reentry experiments. Image | Spacex In Xataka | “ELON, please, come back”: a week after the ninth launch of Starship, something is not going well at SpaceX headquarters

67 years ago Pope Pius XII starred in the most macabre goodbye of the Church. The reason: exploded in full funeral

Throughout his almost two decades as Pope, Pius XII had to deal with the complex scenario of World War II and The Holocaustwhich has made it A controversial figure. His critics accuse him of having silent before the Nazi extermination. His supporters see in him a strategist who maneuvered to save lives and prevent Hitler’s wrath from being on Christians and Jews. Curiously and After the death of Francisco Ithese days his name is playing for a very different reason: His caulitous funeralthat probably make the burial of Pius XII the most macabre and commented of the long history of the Vatican. After all There are few chronicles that they argue that during their funeral one of the worst things occurred that can happen in such circumstances: his body exploded for the past of the curia and the doctors. Literally. A goodbye with controversy Pius XII had a pontificate convulsive. And very much in spite of (and that of the church) their last days were fogged by the same feeling. Although his agony was not especially long (he felt bad October 6 of 1958 and died only a few days later, on Thursday 9) everything related to his health status became an obsession for the press. So much interested and such was the fight to publish in first the death of the Pope that some media decided to use a first level source: the doctor Riccardo Galeazzi-Lisiwho for decades had been a friend, confidant and personal doctor (Pontifical file) of Pius XII. “In those days the Vatican was extremely hermetic and it would not have occurred to him He remembered in 2005 The journalist Alexander Chancellor. When in 1968 he put himself at the head of the Reuters delegation in Italy, he himself met an old red phone in the office that, as his colleagues explained, had been installed there ten years before to be able to contact Galeazzi-Lisi. The problem is that the doctor turned out to be a source as influential as unreliable and lack of scruples. Over time Galeazzi-Lisi It would end up expelled of the Vatican for allegedly wanting to take advantage of his position at the Holy See while the Pope agonized. To be precise, They accused him to strain a camera in their room to photograph the dying and then sell the material. The reward was juicy. ABC remember that there were magazines and editorials that offered him $ 3,200 for the snapshots and another 20,000 for his story. It was not the only thing that the doctor was accused. From Riccardo Galeazzi-Lisi, it is also said that he promised to give a journalist’s death exclusively. The pact was allegedly that when Pius XII had gone to better life, the doctor would open a window of the papal residence. With what they did not tell, neither the doctor nor the press was that the heat of the Roman October took a nun to open that same window to ventilate the building, which led the reporter to misunderstand the signal. Other sources They assure that what Galeazzi-Lisi had committed was to stir a handkerchief and that the journalist confused him with a curtain moved by the wind. Whatever the right version, the truth is that on Wednesday, October 8, when the Pope was Agonizing but still aliveseveral media went out with a news as resounding as false: “Il Papà è Morto”. There were still several hours for Pius XII to die due to a “circulatory disorder.” The news was made public another better doctor, Antonio Gasbarrini. The most curious thing is that the main (and infamous) participation of Galeazzi-Lisi in the last goodbye of Pius XII began just then, after the death of the Pope. A frustrated embalming Although Francisco I simplified Papal funeral In order for the ceremony to look more like that of “a shepherd” than to “a powerful man of this world”, his funeral has made clear once again that the burial of a high pontiff is an unusual event. It is estimated that in just a few days about 250,000 people They passed before the coffin, in the Basilica of San Pedro del Vaticano, to say goodbye to him. In times of Pius XII something similar happened. The body used to stay Exposed for days so that the faithful could transmit their goodbye. And that, of course, required trying to remain preserved in the best possible conditions as much time as possible. The usual thing was that they retired part of the body of the body, but that idea did not seem like Pius XII too much, determined to be buried “As God created it”. In His memoirs Galeazzi-Lisi recounts how to these misgivings he decided to speak to the Pope of a new conservation technique that he had developed with a colleague of Naples, a simple, little invasive method of a mixture of herbs and essential oils. The technique was known as “Aromatic osmosis”it had been prepared by Galeazzi-Lisi with the help of a embalder called Oreste Nuzzi and one of its great advantages was that it barely required to manipulate (or eviscerate) the body of the deceased. It arrived with submerge it in the oil and aromatic herbs preparation and then wrapped it in layers. The doctor assured that the method was similar to that used by the Egyptians in their rites or the one that had been used with Jesus Christ. In his galeazzi-lisi memories even He recounts How he showed Pius XII a hand treated with his mixture. “He was amazed to see his appearance”. Did the Pope accepted that new technique to his body? It is not clear. What seems to be that Galeazzi-Lisi managed to achieve the approval of the Church. The works started on October 10 and priori followed the doctor’s guidelines: the body of the Holy Father was treated with the preparation of herbs and oils and then covered with a kind of cellophane to “conserve volatile aromas and ensure the best … Read more

The second opportunity of the flight that exploded in the last attempt

The highest rocket in the world will take off again after some Unexpected vibrations made it explode during the seventh launch. Starship’s eighth flight will be a repetition of the previous one to try everything Spacex left in the inkwell, and can be followed live. Date and time of launch. Like the two previous flights, the eighth Starship launch It is scheduled to take off from Texas in the afternoon. The objective is that the reentry of the ship takes place in the hours of dawn to capture with more light the sparkling maneuvers. The launch window opens at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, March 3; local time in Starbase, Texas. In other cities: Madrid, Spain (CET, UTC+1): Tuesday, March 4 at 00:30 Mexico City, Mexico (CST, UTC -6): Monday, March 3 at 5:30 p.m. Buenos Aires, Argentina (Art, UTC -3): Monday, March 3 at 8:30 p.m. Bogotá, Colombia (COT, UTC -5): Monday, March 3 at 6:30 p.m. Lima, Peru (Pet, UTC -5): Monday, March 3 at 6:30 p.m. Santiago, Chile (CLST, UTC -3): Monday, March 3 at 8:30 p.m. Caracas, Venezuela (Vet, UTC -4): Monday, March 3 at 7:30 p.m. How to see it live. Spacex will broadcast live flight Through its website and his Official X Profile. The broadcast will begin 40 minutes before takeoff. On YouTube, the channels of Nasaspaceflight, Lab Padre and Everyday Astronaut They have also enabled live broadcasts with their own cameras since the surroundings of the launch platform. In Spanish it will broadcast it Space borderoverlooking Baghdad, on the other side of the border, in Mexico. They will also be narrating it in Spanish Mission control, Manuel Mazzanti and Spacexstorm. Two pending demonstrations. A “stronger harmonic resonance phenomenon” phenomenon caused a liquid oxygen escape in the flight 7 starship, which ended up disintegrating over the Atlantic Ocean, near the Turkish and Caicos Islands. As a repetition of the failed launch, Spacex hopes to complete a series of demonstrations that were left without doing in January: First load deployment: Once the scheduled speed and altitude have been reached, the Starship 34 will turn off its engines, open the gate of its load bay and display four “simulators” of Starlink satellites; wooden models that will be your first useful letter New re -obsolete in space: Spacex first demonstrated in the sixth flight the ability to readele a raptor engine in the emptiness of the space, today it will verify the behavior of the engine before the ninth flight, where it will be crucial to redeem the ship to extend it in a controlled way All eyes put in the reentry. More delicate will be the time of the atmospheric reentry. This could be the Starship’s last ametering before trying to catch the ship With the arms of the launch tower, as has already happened twice with the Super Heavy propeller. However, Spacex still does not have a definitive design for the thermal shield, so it will test different modifications on this flight. Areas of the ship without thermal tiles to measure how the heat fuselage endures the heat. Metal tiles of various kinds, even with active refrigeration, an addition that had been discarded Because of its complexity and is on the table again. New sensors, redesigned front alerons, improvements in propulsion subsystems and a more precise adjustment of the edges between tiles to avoid hot points complete the list of novelties of the ship. Starship 34 is the second ship of a new version that Spacex calls Starship Block 2and that more than 100 tons of load will be able to launch at orbit. In Xataka | Spacex already knows why the last starship exploded and wants to turn the page, so he will try to repeat the flight this Friday

You already know exactly why the previous one exploded

He Eighth Starship test flight It is scheduled for this Friday. It has only been a month and a half since the flight of flight 7 suffered a spectacular explosion In full ascent, but Spacex already knows exactly what happened, and has taken measures to prevent it from happening again. Closed research: Starship 33 exploded for excess vibrations On January 16, 2025, the larger rocket in the world He took off again from Starbase, southeast of Texas. It was the first time that Spacex tested a series of improvements in the second stage, known as Starship Block 2. The Super Heavy propeller, 71 meters high, fulfilled all its objectives: it turned on its 33 engines, took off and accelerated to separate from the Starship ship, about 65 km altitude. One of the 13 engines that had to turn on for the return maneuver did not turn on due to a failure in the ignition system. However, the propeller successfully detached the upper ring and returned, with two meters less high and about nine tons less weight, to the launch platform, where he maneuvered (now, with 13 engines) to be captured by the Tower arms. As for the Starship ship, 52 meters high, lit its six engines successfully and separated from the super heavy following the expected trajectory … until, two minutes later, Spacex detected a flash In the rear of the ship, which houses non -pressurized systems between the liquid oxygen tank and the thermal shield. And two minutes later, another flash. It was one Fugging of propellants which ended up triggering a fire. The fire remained, leading to the progressive disconnection of the engines until the total loss of communication with the ship at 8 minutes and 20 seconds of flight. Starship 33 disintegrated in the descent phase, three minutes after the loss of contact, Near the Turkish and Caicos Islandssoutheast of the Bahamas. The ship disintegrated before self -destruction protocols were activated, but according to Spacex, the entire material fell within the planned impact area, without significant environmental damage. The cause of the failure? A “stronger harmonic resonance phenomenon”. Excessive vibrations that submitted the propulsion system to excessive stress. The accumulation of flammable gases exceeded the capacity of the ship to purge them, which ended up causing liquid oxygen leaks. Flight 8 will be a repetition of 7, with some improvements to avoid another explosion Although the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has not officially closed the investigation of flight 7, it is expected to do so in time to approve flight 8 this Friday, February 28, at 22:30 UTC. Despite the loss of the ship, flight 7 served to improve Starship design and perfect the rocket that promises to be total and quickly reusable. Spacex did a test of long -term static ignition With the Starship 34 to study the problem of vibrations. The company has planned design changes in the rocket to reduce the risk of leaks and improve the ventilation of the back of the ship. Next versions of Starship will have a new generation of engines, the Raptor 3, which occupy a lower volume and eliminate many of the ducts susceptible to leaks of current Raptor 2. As repetition of flight 7, the eighth Starship test launch will include another attempt to capture the super heavy and everything that could not be tested on the previous flight: the first Starship load deployment (four wooden Starlink satellit simulators) In a suborbital trajectory, the first redempted of a raptor engine in space, to validate future orbital maneuvers, and the Validation of multiple improvements in the reentry. Ship 34 will be the Second Starship Block 2which still has to demonstrate most of its improvements. This new version of the ship includes a redesign of the front flaps that reduces exposure to heat and improves aerodynamics in the reentry. It also has larger frontal deposits that increase its ability to store propelants by 25%. The reentry and the Starship landing maneuver is the most delicate phase of the flight, due to the temperature that the ship reaches. Spacex has strategically eliminated some ceramic thermal tiles to evaluate the vulnerabilities of the ship. On the eighth flight, it will try alternative metal materials, some of them with active refrigeration, a system that the company had ruled out and now is on the table again. New radars will also be tested to improve the accuracy of the landing and capture of the ship, something that will luckily occur on flight 9. Image | Spacex In Xataka | Spacex has revealed the imminent flight plans of the Starship: they are hyperactive even for Elon Musk himself

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.