candidates

More and more work interviews are with an AI and more and more candidates refuse to have them

by

One of the sectors in which AI is penetrating more quickly is in human resources. We have been talking to you for months that many candidates looking for employment were surprised that His interviewer was an AI. They were not isolated cases, more and more companies are using in their selection processes and there are already those who are refusing to be interviewed by a bot. What’s happening. If you are looking for work, it is possible that the interview is made by a bot fed by AI. It is a growing trend that arises from a problem: the departments of human resources are increasingly limited They often have to interview hundreds of candidates. Using AI to filter the best profiles is presented as a solution. The problem is that candidates are not liking anything. Candidates against. They tell it in Fortunethere are more and more interviews made by AI and the reaction of the interviewees is being quite negative. “I do not want to work for a company in which the RRHH head does not even take the trouble to spend some time to talk to me,” said Debra Borchardt, one of the interviewees. He did not have to wait long to form an opinion, as soon as he connected he caused him rejection: “I don’t like this. It’s horrible,” he recalls. The truth is that the experiences describing some candidates are quite mediocre, with bots that limit themselves to reciting the curriculum and ask questions, but are not able to answer if the candidates have a doubt. Sometimes they even begin to hallucinate and They repeat questions without stopping. This makes many candidates get out of the interviews before they finish and others reject participating in selection processes with AI. Companies in favor. For companies that are using these interviewers, the experience is being more than positive. Adam Jackson, CEO of Braintrustthe company that is dedicated to creating these bots, assures Fortune that there is no generalized rejection by the candidates. If “our clients would not find the tool useful (…) and we are not seeing that, but quite the opposite.” For those responsible for hiring, AI saves them having to interview hundreds of candidates “ago 100 interviews and tells you what have been the best ten, there the human takes control,” says Jackson, although he also recognizes that the interviewers are limited. Increasingly. According to summarize data91% of those responsible for hiring used AI in their work especially to summarize curriculum and schedule interviews. IA interviewers are the next step and more and more companies are adopting them. Although most cases reach us from the United States, there are Spanish companies that They are using the Telefónica Tech And there is also startups creating solutions of this type. It seems that we like it or not, the interviewers AI They have come to stay. Candidates also use AI. It is not just a human resources thing, there are also candidates Using AI to overcome selection processes. In Reddit we can read from cases of people who admit to having used chatgpt in an interview even human interviewers who have encountered candidates who They responded with the help of a chatbotwhich caused him to discard it from the process. Image | Julia M Cameron, Pexels In Xataka | Someone used AI to overcome an interview on Amazon. His success has made Google see his candidates face to face

It is “very open” to acquisitions in AI. These are our candidates

by

Tim Cook admitted yesterday, in The call with investors After the presentation of quarterly results, which Apple is “very open” to acquisitions that accelerate its road map in AI. A historical confession for a company that has never spent more than 3,000 million on a purchase. Why is it important. Apple has been delayed for two years with respect to its rivals in AI. With the new postponed Siri and the pressure of competitors and investors, Cook needs movements. His Budget of 500,000 million for investments in the United States He gives margin for a great operation. The context. During the call, Cook explained that Apple has already bought “around seven companies” this year, although he acknowledged that they are “small by nature.” The CEO also confirmed that they are “reallocating a considerable number of people” to focus on AI functions and that they will “significantly increase” investments. The main candidates 📍 Perplexity (Estimated assessment: 18,000 million dollars) In favor: Bloomberg He already reported a few weeks conversations between both parties. His approach – squeezed with AI – would fit perfectly with Apple’s problems The possible end of Google payments By safari. Against: Your model is based on using LLMS of third parties (OpenAi, Anthropic and Company), does not develop its own fundamental technology. And Apple usually prefer to control the entire chain. 📍 Anthropic (Estimated assessment: 170,000 million dollars) In favor: Philosophically is aligned with Apple in the AI approach, prioritizing security and privacy. Claude It is considered the most “safe” model in the market, especially among the big ones. Against: The connections that with Amazon (Invested 8,000 million in it) and regulatory risks make it especially complicated. In addition, it is too expensive (its assessment is this week) even for Apple. Anthropic would cost 56 times more than the biggest purchase made by Apple: Beats. 📍 Mistral (Estimated assessment: 6,000 million dollars) In favor: European company with less regulatory complications. Develop your own modelsit already has products in the market without the need to go to others and has experience in AI Edge (local), key to Apple’s strategy and vision. Against: Less technological maturity than OpenAI or Anthropic. In addition, its ecosystem is mainly European, somewhat distant land geographically and sidererily distant in regulatory ideology for Apple. Between the lines. Tm cook did not want to answer what parts of the AI chain could end Commoditized. He said “that would reveal part of our strategy.” A clear track is that Apple plans to control differentiating elements so as not to have to depend on external APIS. Other possible candidates Although with very remote options. 📍 Hugging Face (Estimated assessment: millions) In favor: The ‘Github of the AI’ with the largest community of developers. Control the distribution of models and tools that Apple needs for its ecosystem. Against: Business model still immature and too focused on open source for Apple’s taste. 📍 COPE (Estimated assessment: 5,500 million) In favor: Specialized in business and models optimized for efficiency, some perfect fit in mobile devices and local computing. It also has fewer links with technological giants. Against: Lower brand recognition than its competitors and a main focus on B2B, unlike an Apple almost completely delivered to the consumer market. 📍 Runway (Estimated assessment: 1.5 billion) In favor: Lead the AI generative video, perfect for Apple’s obsession with visual content. And would revitalize the suite Apple creative, starting for final cut. Against: Very specific niche. It does not solve the fundamental problem of Siri and conversational assistants. The discards Yes, but. Apple’s history invites prudence. Eleven years ago since its greatest purchase, Beatsand “only” was for 3,000 million. Minutiae compared to what almost any investment requires today. That said, the current pressure is unpublished. It is the only company of the “seven magnificent” technological in red numbers this year: -15% in the stock market. The threat. The danger to Apple is not in acquisitions, but in time. Run against him. Openai will present soon GPT-5Meta has thrown the house through the window to capture the best talent, Google continues to integrate an increasingly powerful gemini in its entire ecosystem. Each quarter that happens with a dysfunctional Siri and without a really decisive Apple Intelligence is lost terrain. In Xataka | After almost a decade with the Apple Watch I have spent a Garmin. And I have understood what I was losing me Outstanding image |

Canva demands candidates for their use

by

The use of artificial intelligence in Personnel selection processes It is generating an intense debate in the technological sector. On the one hand, companies are shown anxious to implement ia in their processes and encourage their employees to use this type of tools to improve your productivity. On the other hand, some companies consider a trap that candidates resort to tools from AI during work interviews or in the selection processes. Between so much contradiction, in Canva,The Saas de Design Service, have decided to make the use tools of AI into an essential requirement for their future employees and invites them to use them during their technical tests, as he collected The Register. Canva changes the rules. Canva has taken a radical turn in its personnel selection process. Now, candidates to cover development positions must use programming assistants based on artificial intelligence during technical tests, As explained Simon Newton, Canva Platform Chief in a statement. This decision is based on the fact that “almost half of the Canva Border and Backend engineers use a programming tool assisted by AI” daily, which converts the Use of AI tools in something expected and fundamental for the work they will develop in the company. “We believe that AI tools are essential to maintain productivity and competitiveness in the development of modern software.” Change of criteria. The development manager confessed that there has been a change in criteria in this regard. “Until recently, our interview process demanded candidates to solve programming problems without the tools they would use at work,” said Newton. By prohibiting the use of these tools, Canva realized that I was not evaluating correctly The skills of their candidates maintaining technical criteria that had become obsolete, forcing them to use them clandestinely. “Instead of fighting this reality and trying to control the use of AI, we decided to adopt transparency and adapt to this new reality. This approach gives us a clearer idea of ​​its real performance by joining our team,” said Newton. Internal discrepancies. Despite the logic of the reasoning offered by the head of Canva, not all of its employees They have taken good The change of criteria in interviews. Some of their engineers assured that the selection tests had become “sessions of Vibe Coding“ However, Newton has wanted NEW WORK CONTEXT. “We continue to evaluate the foundations of computer science through the new process and we hope that engineers assume the full responsibility of any code they produce, whether they have written them themselves or with the help of AI,” Newton wrote in his statement. Criteria disparity with AI. Many companies continue to consider that the use of artificial intelligence in technical interviews is an unfair advantage or even An unacceptable trap during the selection process. In some sectors, it is feared that candidates can hide their lack of real knowledge by relying on AI to overcome the evidence, which has led some companies to demand face -to -face interviews to avoid its use. In fact, paradoxically, even companies like Anthropic, which Claude develops, has asked its candidates that do not use the To fill in applications for vacancies. On the other hand, technology companies such as Duolingo and Shopify are actively promoting the use of artificial intelligence Among its employees and encouraging them to form In its use. This trend indicates that, in a short time, other companies could follow the steps of Canva and assess the domain of AI as an essential skill to access their work teams. In Xataka | The greatest fear was that AI took our work. The reality is that they are replacing those who are learning to work Image | Unspash (Swello)

You will do your next job interview with a robot. That dehumanization is unraveling candidates

by

A young woman named Ken public In its Tiktok account (@its_ken04) a 25 second video that quickly went viral. In him this user showed how he was being interviewed by Alex for work. The problem is that Alex was not a real person, but a virtual avatar with AI. One that also began to hallucinate and demonstrates that the dehumanizing experience of looking for work is going worse. Robots -made interviews. Both recruiters and candidates They use AI to advance increasingly broken selection processes. The consequences for each other, yes, are very different. The candidates who face the job search process already used to meet a dehumanizing experience, with rough processes and lack of response by recruiters. Now things are going worse, because AI is doing those even more terrible processes. @its_ken04 It was genuinely so creepy and weird. PLEASE STOP TRYING TO BE LAZY AND HAV AI TRY TO DO YOU JOB !!! It gave me the creeps so bad #fyp ♬ Original Sound – STIs Ken 🤍 My interviewer alucina. Ken counted in 404 average His recent experience when interviewed by a bot called Alex and developed by the company APRIORA. During the interview Ken, who was looking for work near his home in Columbus, Ohio (USA), saw how the virtual avatar stuck and repeated the phrase “Vertical Bar Pilates” 14 times in a row for no reason. A spooky experience. Before the interview, the company warned it that AI would be used during the selection process. Despite that notice, for Ken the experience was “spooky and I was scared. I did not make any funny until I published it in Tiktok and the comments made me feel better.” The video already has more than 3,600 comments, and in all of them the support to Ken was unanimous. And in many cases the conclusion was the same. I will not interview myself with an AI. Ken already made it clear that “if another company wants to speak with an AI I will simply decline that offer.” Who commented on their video published similar answers. “If you don’t take the trouble to interview myself, I will not take the trouble to try to work there,” said one of the comments. In another, a user who had responded to an offer for a Human Resources department, asked “why would I want to work in human resources in a company that is not even worthy to have a human interaction?” The promise of recruiting robots. Aguriora was founded in 2023 and its managers promise that thanks to their robotic recruiters, companies can hire “87% faster” and conduct “interviews 93% cheaper” because several candidates can be interviewed at the same time. One of the co -founders, Aaron Wang, explained in Forbes for months to “the candidates prior to interviews in many cases, because that reduces their anxiety and allows them to perform in the best possible way during the interview.” @PetobSesed777 Should I Email Them? I was expectating to Real Human. They Didnt tell me ahead of time theyd use ai. #ai ♬ Original Sound – Freddie Generalized rejection of the IAS that do work interviews. That does not seem to be the feeling of those who are interviewed. In Slate They narrated the experience of a videographer named Tyler Jensen, who was also found being interviewed by an AI that began to get stuck. Other users who have gone through the process have ended up publishing memes and false and satirical videos In Tiktok trying to ironize about an increasingly dehumanizing experience. Some even are found by surprise with which those who are interviewing them is an AI. In all cases, the sensation is the same: disappointment for the growing dehumanization of a process that was already hard and usually demoralizing. What do experts say. Mike Peditto, a practical expert consultant for interviewers, explains that technology can certainly help filter candidates. In fact, it made it clear that this will go more: “It is becoming something gigantic. I think we are going to a future in which (the work interviews carried out by an AI) will be generalized.” But he also admitted that “there is a slow will to adopt by job seekers, which I understand perfectly.” An industry contaminated everywhere. The job search processes have long been corrupt. Interviews are only part of the work, because candidates too They try to save work and apply to many offers at the same time with CV that they make with the help of the AI ​​and that customize for each job. As if that were not enough, candidates “train” Chatgpt simulates being the recruiter. The AI ​​is everywhere, and although it can certainly be helpful, it is generating even more problems for either side of the equation. And the algorithms fail. We have already seen how to delegate certain processes so that it is the machines and algorithms that take care of them can be dangerous. It happens of course in the field of job search, where for months some companies They use AI systems to analyze and filter the curriculum vitae with the so -called monitoring algorithms of candidates or ATS (Applicant Tracking Systems). A study by the University of Washington He indicated how AI systems favor 85% of the time to those CVS that belong to names of men traditionally used in Caucasian men. In fact, that same study indicated how black men were the great harmed, and were rejected by these systems almost 100% of the time. Image | APRIORA In Xataka | If your chair holds in a job interview, it is no accident: they are evaluating more than your curriculum

Someone used AI to overcome an interview on Amazon. His success has made Google see his candidates face to face

by

There is a thin line Between genius and deception. With the arrival of artificial intelligence, this line is fade even more and the scope of work interviews are a good example of this. A student exceeded a technical interview of Amazon helped with AI and his success has had consequences: someone gave him away to his university, he has created a company so that others use AI in their work interviews and Google will stop doing their work interviews remotely in the face of increased the use of AI by the candidates. The debate on whether the use of AI has been opened in a job interview It is cheating Or it is to use the tools at your fingertips to find a solution to the problem. Entrepreneur or cheater? According to published CNBCChungin “Roy” Lee is a 21 -year -old computer student at Columbia University who got some work interviews in large technological ones such as Amazon, Meta or Tiktok. During the remote technical interview with Amazon, the student used an AI tool that he had created with which he could easily answer the programming questions and tests asked for the Amazon recruiter. “Today, everyone program with the help of AI,” said the young student to CNBC. Technical tests are an essential requirement to access engineering positions in these large companies so the young man had no choice but to prepare conscientiously as can be checked on his profile of the website of the website Leetcode training. Such and As you collect Gizmodothat training was one of the hardest tasks that Lee faced. “It was one of the most unhappy experiences I’ve had programming. I felt that I had to do it. It was something I needed for a job in a large technological company, and there was so much to learn, so much to memorize, and so many random problems that I could wait for me to ask me. He made me hate the programming.” According to the student, the problems that arise in the interviews are very unlikely and more a “theater” approaches in which the interviewee pretends that he has never seen that problem, when in reality he has already studied and memorized his solution. “They are not representative of what you do as a programmer at work,” said the young man. To lighten this “technical procedure” the student used a tool he had developed to successfully overcome his interview with Amazon. The test result was a success and ended up receiving a job offer in the company, although the young man rejected it since the interview was only a way to test his tool. A video with the recorded test that hung on your YouTube account (now not available) and on the tool website are proof of this. Chivatazo and university file Days after his technical interview, Lee received a notification from the University of Columbia informing him of a disciplinary hearing that the teaching entity had opened to the second year student, as you can read in the letter that Roy Lee has published In his X profile. As published by Gizmodo, the University showed its rejection of the use of AI tools as “support” to these technical tests, which it considered as a trap. “Amazon has a long tradition of collaboration with Columbia Engineering … and we are deeply worried that situations like this occur. We trust Columbia will take the appropriate measures regarding this student and we hope to continue with this long collaboration,” says the university in its writing. The young man, far from being concerned about the measures undertaken by the entity, offers the tool so that other students and candidates can use it in their interviews. Face to face in technology Due to the increasingly frequent use of these AI tools during interviews, great technological ones are thinking about again doing these technical interviews in person. Such and As I pointed out Cnbc en One of the latest meetings of L sundar interviews in person. This request contrasts with the fact that, only a few months before, the own Google CEO admit That, thanks to AI, around 25% of the Google code was generated by artificial intelligence. The use of AI is increasingly present in selection processes. From the Use of candidate monitoring algorithms (ATS for the acronym in English of Applicant Tracking Systems), that They automatically select the curriculum of the most appropriate candidates, to methods of training for candidates Based on chatgpt or, like Roy Lee, the Use of AI during interviews remotely The use of AI tools in selection processes, especially by candidates, has opened A debate on social networks On whether this is a lack of ethics, or is as valid as any other tool with which you work daily. In this debate, there are those who see right to use these tools during the interview whenever it is done transparently, since it shows that the candidate has resources To find the solution to a problem. “I remember that once, more than a decade ago, I said in an interview: ‘I do not know that specific command, but there is Google for what we do not know.’ assures a user which raises an equivalence between the use of AI and the search engine. Others, on the other hand, ensure that the objective of these tests is precisely to check the programming skills. If it is altered using AI, loses its reason for being. In Xataka | If your chair holds in a job interview, it is no accident: they are evaluating more than your curriculum Image | Pexels (Anna Shvets)

Universities do not supply candidates

by

Artificial intelligence is putting in check to the university systemthat is not being able to form the necessary rhythm to the thousands of candidates who are demanding companies. A study of Indesia, association aimed at promoting the use of AI in companies and SMEs, points out that up to 5,000 job offers related to AI and data science were uncovered in 2023 due to lack of qualified profiles. Much demand, few candidates. According to data from the report ‘The future of talent in artificial intelligence and dates in Spain’ of Indesia, almost half of the job offers in AI run the risk of not being able to cover, placing this sector as the most affected by talent scarcityfollowed by cybersecurity and cloud. The roles that record greater difficulty in covering their vacancies due to the lack of qualified personnel are Data Architect, Data Engineer, AI/ML Engineer, NLP Engineer and Computer Vision Engineer. Núria Ávalos, General Director of Indesia, declared to The country that “many degrees are now emerging, but until these people are in a position to assume positions as a data architect there are a few years.” That will take its toll to the industry. The report estimates that, if the accelerator is not chopped in the formation of new talent in these matters, during 2025 34.5% more professional will be needed than in 2024. That is already a very complicated challenge to reach by the deficit that was already recorded last year in professionals from these areas. According to data collected In a study of the Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences of the Pontifical University Comillas, up to 75% of the digital transformation projects fail due to the lack of training of employees or their qualification. From Indesia they estimate that the education system is able to train about 6,000 new professionals a year, which is a very low pace taking into account the demand for demand of this sector in the next five years. Ávalos pointed out that “the positions that are now not covered are for more experienced profiles, people who can incorporate and make a digital transformation into a company.” That is, people with high qualification in a relatively recent area, but who has had a very fast evolution. What do universities offer? On the other side of the shore, the universities responsible for training these profiles have not reacted with sufficient speed, and only one third of the 90 universities in Spain offer degrees or careers related to data engineering or with the Focus on artificial intelligence. Silvia Terrasa, director of the Computer School of the Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV), assured El País that the process to establish a new university degree that responds to the needs of companies. “It is quite tedious. And then the first promotion does not come out until four years later,” justifying that a gap between the offer of jobs and candidates with adequate profiles. The problem is not the students. One of the biggest problems that universities are facing is the personal lack of teaching to teach subjects in the field of data science and AI. It is a deficit of teachers that already crawls from the lower training cycles with the shortage of Qualified personnel in Stem subjects. The problem is aggravated when such a recent specialization is necessary in which, in itself, there is already a shortage of profiles. “We have no teachers to open more groups,” laments the head of the UPV computer school, pointing out that, if 120 seats are offered for their degrees, 300 students stay out due to lack of place and cannot expand them due to foul of teaching staff that imparts them. A solution proposed by Indesia is to turn companies into training centers, in which students can do guided practices for their specialized personnel. “They are increasingly open for their employees to give classes. They know that it enriches and that it is a way of seeing profiles that interest you and bring them as fellows during the practices,” Ávalos slipped. Importing talent from other branches. Despite the talent scarcity, three out of ten technology job offers are for positions related to data science and IA. That has made many graduates in computer engineering or telecommunications, end up occupying these positions since they have common areas of knowledge. Mathematics and Physical graduates are also recruited. Núria Ávalos pointed out that, in many cases, it is the companies themselves that, given the urgency to cover vacancies, form the candidates internally. “They are recycled in a year, it is not necessary to make a master’s degree. They are usually within the companies themselves.” In Xataka | A study reveals which technological profile will be the most wanted and best paid in 2025: interface designer Image | Unspash (Wonderlane)

Musk, Zuckerberg and Bezos are candidates

by

2024 was a year especially good for big fortunes in which, except some exceptionsall increased their assets. This growth trend has changed the forecasts regarding the idea that, in the next ten years, one of these billionaires will become a billionaire, accumulating wealth in excess of a trillion dollars. According to a report that Oxfam Intemón has presented during the Davos Summit 2025the accumulation of wealth has become so extreme that the forecast now is that up to five billionaires will exceed that trillion-dollar ceiling in the next ten years. Fortunes accelerate. According to Oxfam Intermón, previous forecasts that a person could reach a fortune exceeding one trillion dollars (European trillion, not American), have become obsolete following the rapid growth rate recorded by large fortunes during 2024. The humanitarian organization highlights that, during the fiscal year 2024, large fortunes tripled the rate of increase in your assets with respect to 2023. According to data from Oxfam Intermón“in 2024, the number of billionaires was already 2,769, compared to 2,565 the previous year, and their combined wealth increased from 13 to 15 trillion dollars in just 12 months. This is the second largest increase in the combined wealth of billionaires in a single year, since records have been kept”. The year of AI and the space race. This accelerated growth of the largest fortunes is mainly due to two important factors: the rise in the development of AI and the beginning of private space race. In the heat of the development of AI, the fortunes of some of its protagonists have increased, such as meteoric rise of Jensen Huang to the top of the millionaire lists, of Larry Ellison or of Mark Zuckerberg. The space race has two proper names: Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. Both millionaires have placed their aerospace companies among the best valued, and the contracts with NASA They have provided them with a good financial cushion. The case of Bezos and Musk is especially notable because both millionaires “play both sides” because their companies They are also at the forefront of AI development. Trump’s victory has influenced. The Oxfam Intermón report noted that “this growing concentration of wealth is possible thanks to a monopolistic concentration of power, in which billionaires exercise more and more influence over industries and public opinion.” The victory of Donald Trump and the closing of the ranks of big technology companies supporting the new president has been another important factor in the increase in the forecast that up to five billionaires will exceed one trillion dollars in the next decade. The now president of the United States has demonstrated it in his first decreeslegislating for prioritize interests of these companies around the world and, therefore, boosting the fortunes of their founders and CEOs. Elon Musk was already a candidate. With a fortune of $432.6 billion, Elon Musk is currently the richest person in the world, according to the list of millionaires of Forbes. As such, he already appeared in all the pools as a candidate to be one of the first billionaires in history. The businessman of South African origin beat a double record at the end of 2024: he managed to surpass the threshold of $400 billion and did so by almost doubling his fortune in just two months. Added to these estimates is the foreseeable growth in the assets of Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison or Jensen Huang, before a deregulated scene in which the large corporations on which their fortunes are based will have fewer legal restrictions on expanding. In Xataka | Trump has made big technology companies change, but not because of ideology: they are companies behaving like companies Image | Meta, Blue Origin, Flickr (Government of India)

Diego Alonso and Vicente Sánchez the Cruz Azul candidates in case Anselmi leaves

by

The Uruguayans Diego Alonso and Vicente Sánchez are the two main candidates to take over as the technical director of Cruz Azul from the Argentine Martín Anselmi, who according to unofficial versions is living his last minutes as coach of the Blue Machine by accepting an offer to direct the team. Port of Portugal. By virtue of the surprising news of this offer for the cement technician, The high command of Cruz Azul is moving to try to close the signing of Alonsowho already coached Pachuca and Monterrey in the Liga MX, being crowned champion with the Tuzos in the 2016 Clausura tournament. So far Alonso is without a team after his bad moment with Panathinaikos in Greece, where in 17 games he only won seven, drew five and lost the same number of games. Besides The Uruguayan coach has experience in the MLS at the helm of Inter Miami, as well as Sevilla of Spain, among other teams. Other candidates are the Portuguese Renato Paiva, the Argentine Gabriel Milito and the Uruguayan Guillermo Almada, but the latter will take control of the team until June, Anselmi’s departure a fact Unofficial versions assure that Porto FC is willing to pay the clause of 5 million dollars for the termination of Anselmi’s contract, with which Iván Alonso would close the signing of his cousin Diego Alonso, to try to maintain the same idea in the technical management of the cement producers. The truth is that it will be within the next few hours when Anselmi’s departure for Porto will take place after the company that represents him began negotiating with the Portuguese team for six months the option of hiring Anselmi. until Monday night when he decided to inform the Cruz Azul board of his decision to leave Mexican soccer. ✍🏻 THE NAMES TO REPLACE ANSELMI. Luis Castillo revealed names that are close to arriving at Cruz Azul in the summer: * Renato Paiva * Gabriel Milito * Guillermo Almada *Diego Alonso pic.twitter.com/eUMbnAW2uu — RECORD DIARY (@record_mexico) January 22, 2025 It should be noted that Anselmi would go to the European team accompanied by his coaching staff who is made up of Facundo Oreja, Luis Patur, Diego Bottaoili, Alberto Sigata and Darío Herrera, who have his back and know their leader’s work method. Given this eventuality, Those from Cruz Azul don’t even get hot from the sun, because the news of Anselmi’s departure takes them with their fingers on the door, since they had designed a squad to fight for the title again after in the 2024 closing tournament, they were one step away by losing the final with America in that controversial penalty against Argentine Rodolfo Rotondi against Israel Reyes As well as the defeat in the semifinals of the Apertura 2024 against América itself due to another controversial penalty committed again by Rotondi and that spoiled the Machine’s plans to lift the tenth crown in its history. Continue reading:– Is Cruz Azul left without a coach? They assure that Martín Anselmi will coach Porto– The president of Cruz Azul fears for his life and holds Billy Álvarez’s family responsible– Diego Alonso, former coach of Inter Miami and the Uruguay national team, is fired from Panathinaikos

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.