Bill Gates is responsible for the “biggest mistake of all time” that cost Microsoft 400 billion, according to the co-founder of Android

Nobody is perfect. Not even the great tycoons who have taken technology companies to the peak of success. One of these examples is Bill Gates who during an interview recognized What has been the biggest mistake he has made in his time running Microsoft. And the co-founder of Android did not hesitate to mock him through social networks several years after this confession. Today we all associate the Android operating system with Google, which is the company behind it. But in its beginnings Android was in limbo between Microsoft and Google. This is where Bill Gates’ mistake was, who did not decide to bet on this operating system, causing Google to keep it and get the great performance it has today. Android co-founder gives a different version of Gates’ “biggest mistake” It was a few years ago during an interview with Julia HartzCEO of Evenbrite, where the Microsoft co-founder acknowledged that the biggest mistake he has made ““It’s the mismanagement that I got involved in that caused Microsoft to not be what Android is.” This mismanagement caused Google will develop Android before Microsoftand achieved the great success it has today. In addition to the many benefits that Android leaves today for being the operating system with the largest market share, 72.46% global share according to statistics from the end of 2025. That is why a bad decision and problems with antitrust laws meant that this operation was not closed. Although he tried to do something similar with Windows Phone, it didn’t turn out well as we have already seen. For Bill Gates there is only room for an operating system other than iOS on the market. And this is something that figure at 400,000 million dollars that he lost with this bad decision 20 years ago. He related it in the following way: The biggest mistake of all was the mismanagement I got into that caused Microsoft to not be what Android is, meaning Android is the standard platform for non-Apple phones. In reality, it is a winner-take-all market. If you have half as many applications or 90% of them, you are on your way to total ruin. There’s room for exactly one non-Apple operating system, and how much is that worth? 400 billion dollars that would be transferred from company G (Google) to company M (Microsoft). For Gates, this is one of the biggest mistakes in history, and he has no doubt that if he had reached the mobile market before Google, Microsoft would be the company that would be dominating today. Their mistake was leaving Google with Android “free” until it developed Windows Phone. The best part of this story comes when the co-founder of Android appeared last year to comment on these words through your X account. In a publication he details that his goal when developing Android was to prevent Microsoft from controlling phones “as it did with computers, stifling innovation.” Click on the image to access the publication. With this concern that Microsoft could control the mobile world, the co-founder of Android affirms that “Sorry Bill, but you’re more responsible for the $400 billion loss than you think.” On this topic Steve Ballmer also spokethe charismatic former CEO of Microsoft, who admitted that this mistake by Microsoft was motivated by overconfidence and “arrogance” focused on the supremacy of the Windows brand. This led them to underestimate the competition and assume that they could dominate any new market by imposing their ecosystem, but evidently this was not the case. Images | Wikimedia Commons (UK Government) Via | Windows Central In Xataka | “In five years they will have to pay taxes”: Bill Gates has pointed out the elephant in the room of AI and humanoids A version of this article was published in 2025 in Genbeta

Dark matter has been a mystery for decades. A strange event from 2019 could be the evidence we were looking for to unravel it

December 18, 2019. A star of the great Magellanic cloud increases its brightness. It does so in a way that is intense enough not to go unnoticed by scientists analyzing the data from the Víctor M. Blanco telescope at the Inter-American Observatory of Cerro Tololo (Chile), but not so intense that it corresponds to an explosion. Rather, it is a gentle increase in brightness, followed by a symmetrical decrease in brightness. The entire process lasts 1 hour and baffles scientists, who baptize the object causing this phenomenon as Phoebe. Since then, Phoebe’s origin has been a mystery. Now, the same scientists who made the discovery they have answers that point to what would be one of the oldest objects that have ever been detected. Phoebe’s origin. There are three hypotheses for Phoebe’s origin. For one thing, it could be a free floating planet in the Milky Way. That is, a planet that was expelled from its solar system and now wanders through our galaxy. It could also be exactly the same, but in the Large Magellanic Cloud instead of the Milky Way. Finally, it could be a primordial black hole. That is, a very small black hole that, instead of being formed by the collapse of a star, was caused by fluctuations in the density of matter in the cosmos during the first seconds of the Big Bang. The authors of the study that has just been published have calculated the probabilities of each hypothesis and the third one beats the rest by a factor of 100,000. A gravitational microlens. While Phoebe’s origin has been a mystery all this time, it didn’t take long for scientists to understand the phenomenon that had caused the star’s brightness to fluctuate in 2019. It must have been gravitational microlensing. This is a phenomenon which is formed when a very massive object is placed between our telescopes and another object. The mass of the central object is so great that its gravity is capable of bending space-time, forming a kind of lens that magnifies the image of what is behind it. On the other hand, if what is behind it is a very distant star, what is magnified is its brightness. That is why this increase in brightness occurred, because Phoebe was passing between the star and the telescopes of the Chilean observatory. The key is in the duration. Previous studies with gravitational lensing show that the duration of the event can give us an idea of ​​the mass of the body that causes the lens to form. The lighter the object, the faster it moves and the shorter the increase in brightness lasts. In this case, the phenomenon lasted an hour. It may seem like a lot to us, but in cosmic terms it is quite little. In fact, it is just above the detectable limit. This tells us that the object that caused this increase in brightness must have been very light. According to calculations made by scientists at Swinburne University taking into account fluctuations in brightness, it would have approximately the mass equivalent to three moons. A winning option. Black holes that form from stars usually have at least the mass of about 5 suns. 3 moons is much less. It is also too small an object to correspond to a planet wandering in the Milky Way or the large Magellanic cloud. This, together with the geometry of the event and the expected spatial distribution, has led the probability calculation to lean so clearly towards the primordial black hole. Primordial black holes Big news about something very small. Primordial black holes are theoretical phenomena. It is believed plausible that could have formed in the first seconds of the Big Bang, when fluctuations in the density of matter in the cosmos caused an accumulation of matter dense enough to collapse. Most of them would be very small. They would have most of the characteristics of a black hole, but radically smaller in size. They would form before there were stars or matter as we know it, but they could be related to one of the greatest mysteries of astrophysics: dark matter. Only 5% of the cosmos is made up of “normal” atoms. The rest is unknown. One part is known as dark matter and another as dark energy. It is not known what they are, but one of the hypotheses about dark matter is that it could be composed in part of primordial black holes. Therefore, if it is shown that Phoebe is really a primordial black hole, we would perhaps be facing one of the first demonstrations of the composition of dark matter. And now what? Logically, this is just the beginning. We will have to continue looking for more objects like Phoebe to be able to prove that these scientists are right. For this, You have to know well where to point the telescopes. To begin with, not any of them will do. They need to be sensitive enough to detect gentle changes in the brightness of stars. They also need to be able to focus on large fields of vision. And, if possible, focus on places with a large concentration of stars, since it is easier for the gravitational lensing phenomenon to occur there. It is expected that some observatories, such as the Vera Rubin, will provide interesting data in this regard. Now we will have to analyze them and look for points in common with Phoebe. That December 18, 2019, a pandemic was brewing on Earth, but in space the clue could be jumping that would resolve one of the greatest mysteries in the history of astrophysics. Image |Martin Bernardi |NASA In Xataka | We have been deceived by the distances of the Solar System: the closest neighbor to Neptune is Mercury

If we want to take care of our microbiota, this is what science says about what time it is ideal to have dinner

We give more and more importance to what we eat, and we begin to take into account the information on food labels, and even demonize ultra-processed foods. However, it is so important that we eat like him when We eat, although the latter is something to which we may give very little importance in our environment, but which in truth has a great effect on our microbiota. What happens. We are not the only ones who go to sleep, since the two billion bacteria that inhabit our digestive tract have their own circadian clock. Change it by having dinner after hours Not only does it worsen our digestion, but, according to the latest studies, it pushes us towards a pro-inflammatory and obesogenic metabolism in a matter of days. In this way, changing the time at which we eat dinner can be essential to improve our general metabolic health. The bacteria. To understand why dinner time is critical, you must first understand that our microbiota is not static, but rather the composition and function of our bacteria oscillate in 24-hour cycles like ourselves. In this way, during the day, when we eat, bacteria such as Firmicuteswhich are active to help us process nutrients. However, when the night fast arrives, the ecosystem changes shift and families such as the Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia. And this is something fundamental, because it is the moment in which our bacteria ferment the fiber and produce short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate, which will act as a protective shield for the intestinal barrier and regulate our glucose levels. It’s sensitive. Up to this point everything seems wonderful, but the moment we have a late dinner or if we break the fast with alcohol and a fast night meal like the classic kebab after a party, this delicate ecosystem becomes out of sync. At that time, the Bacteroidetes They decrease, the intestine becomes inflamed and we lose that protective shield. The experiment. The theory sounds good, but how long does it take for us to damage this ecosystem by eating late? The answer lies with a joint team from the CSIC, the University of Murcia and Harvard University through a rigorous test where he submitted to a group of young women and healthy to a crossover experiment. In this case, for one week the women ate the main meal at 2:00 p.m., and the following week it was delayed until 5:30 p.m. Everything else, such as calories, type of diet or hours of sleep, remained identical. The results were forcefulsince seven days of eating late were enough to completely invest the daily rhythm of the microbiota. And, as we have seen before, by moving the schedules towards the night, the microbial diversity was altered and bacteria associated with pro-inflammatory processes began to proliferate (such as Fusobacterium either Porphyromonas). Clinically, this delayed pattern pushes the body into a metabolic state that facilitates obesity and increases the risk of intestinal diseases. The ideal time. The scientific consensus points to a very specific window that for Spaniards represents an important cultural challenge, since it is believed that dinner should be eaten before 8:00 p.m. or 9:00 p.m., while lunch should not exceed 2:00 p.m. Although if we go further, microbiota researchers agree that the ideal period is between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., always guaranteeing that at least two to three hours pass before going to sleep. It is quite important, because it has been seen that people who eat dinner early or at least leave two hours of margin before going to bed They have a 20% lower risk of developing breast and prostate cancer. The key seems to be in melatonin, the sleep hormone, which when secreted naturally displays a powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effect, as long as we are not in full digestion. Images | Caroline Attwood CDC In Xataka | We know more and more about the human microbiota. And there is still little we know about the benefits of probiotics

If you thought the blue zone in your city was expensive, wait until you see what it costs to moor a yacht at the Formula 1 GP in Monaco

The Monaco Grand Prix is, by far, the most glamorous career of the Formula 1 World Championship. Not so much because of the fact that each of its curves keeps a memory of the most successful drivers, but because of the enormous showcase of luxury and opulence when celebrating with one of the most exclusive ports in the world. Not everyone can access the most exclusive spaces at the Monaco GP. Beyond the VIP stands, the real epicenter of luxury It is on the yachts moored in front of the circuit. The mooring of a superyacht during that weekend costs a real fortune, only affordable for the richest in the world. In fact, not even the world’s great fortunes, such as Jeff Bezos, They have a guaranteed position among the privileged few who can afford to watch the race of Formula 1 from the deck of your superyacht. Three million for a front row seat During the week of the Grand Prix, Port Hercule stops being a normal port and becomes a meeting point for the greatest fortunes on the planet and their yachts. Whether you like Formula 1 or not is secondary. The week before the Grand Prix, the parade of enormous superyachts begins, such as the Symphony by Bernard Arnault, founder of LVMH, who take positions highlighted in the Monegasque port. The specialized medium Yacht Harbor estimated that the 2017 test brought together yachts valued at more than 2,000 million euros in Port Hercule. Kismet superyacht, 122 meters long However, not having your own yacht is no excuse for not enjoying a front row seat at sea to enjoy the only Championship race that can be seen from the deck of a luxurious superyacht. Yacht rentals during the race test week skyrocket. The portal of boat rental luxury Cecil Wright offers those types of services and allows you to rent the Kismeta true floating mansion for the modest price of three million euros for one week. While on the streets of Monte Carlo the single-seater engines make the most of their performance, inside the Kismet Up to 12 guests can be accommodated in eight suites. The yacht is equipped with every detail so that guests only have to relax in its Balinese-inspired spa, which includes a hammam, sauna and cryotherapy chamber, waterfall shower and chromotherapy bathtub, gym and yoga studio. One of the covers of Kismet In addition, it allows you to experience all the excitement of the race from any of the jacuzzis on its luxurious decks, and all of this is attended by a crew of 36 people. “Parking” at a Monaco GP Once you have rented the right superyacht to blend in with billionaires and royalty, all that remains is to find a mooring for the yacht. Kismet. Port Hercule is the only port with adequate depth for mooring superyachts of that category. This port offers about 700 berths, but the most sought-after place is the so-called Trackside Zone, where the boats are located next to Quai des États-Unis, Quai Jarlan and the first two positions of Quai U. That is, in the mooring line closest to the circuitwhere the single-seaters pass just a few meters from these yachts. According to the table of Port of Monaco ratesthe price of the mooring is calculated based on how close it is to the runway and the length of the superyacht. Docking a yacht in the port of Monaco during the race ranges from 5,668 euros for a yacht of less than 19 meters in the Port of Fontvieille area, the furthest and without vision of the track, to tripling its price as we get closer to the track, with a mooring price of 16,087 euros for the same 19-meter yacht. Mooring Zone 1 is at the end of the tunnel straight, just when the cars must brake. Passing mooring zone 2, from which you can see the chicane of the Pool areato the Trackside Zone (zone 1) implies a price increase of 25.7%. During the Monaco Grand Prix, mooring a superyacht like the Kismet122 meters long, in the Trackside Zone (zone 1) It can cost around 160,000 euros only for docking during Grand Prix week. Its high price is justified because its proximity turns the Trackside Zone into a kind of floating stand. The yachts are in front of one of the most recognizable parts of the track, right where the cars leave the tunnel and launch towards the Nouvelle Chicane area, one of the classic images of the Monaco Grand Prix. It is a point where the drivers must reduce their speed to follow the curve and face the Pool section, so the millionaires see them pass at a slower speed and the single-seaters can be seen in more detail. Without a doubt, the most millionaire form of watch a formula 1 race. In Xataka | Madrid has been fighting for its F1 Grand Prix for years. Ozempic’s rich heirs also want a Grand Prix in their town Image | Flickr (CaterhamF1)

This new docuseries that Netflix premieres today explores it in depth

There is a gesture that millions of spectators know by heart: Rafa Nadal adjusts his shirt, places the water bottles parallel, touches his nose, his ear, the back of his neck. A ritual that lasted twenty years and was always passed off as superstition or eccentricity. Zach Heinzerling, the director of the docuseries ‘Rafa‘, that Netflix premieres today, came to the conclusion after months of filming the tennis player that these tics are the visible externalization of a psychology built on insecurity and Nadal’s way of managing it. This is how deeply this documentary goes into the engine room of a champion. The series, produced by Skydance Sports, consists of four episodes and offers access to Nadal, his family and his close circle during his last year on the ATP circuit, in 2024. It is not a documentary about the 22 Grand Slams, although they appear, but a portrait of the wear and tear that made winning them possible. Leading the project is Emmy winner and Oscar nominee Heinzerling. The docuseries traces Nadal’s career from his beginnings at just three years old until his return to competition in 2024, showing nor only the evolution of a champion but also the physical and emotional exhaustion that marked his career, which made his own body his main rival. Injuries prevented him from participating in 18 Grand Slams throughout his career, and the series focuses on the last of those competitions. One of the axes of the series is the tennis player’s relationship with Toni Nadal, an unusual presence in the athlete’s career, since most elite tennis players change coaches every three or four years. Rafa Nadal kept him for twenty, and that coach was a relative who also lived in the same town in Mallorca. It is these types of details that suggest a series very different from the typical sports documentary. In Xataka | Stephen King unequivocally recommends Netflix’s new number 1: it is “an absolute pleasure”

It has been operating for 30 years and is the geothermal envy of Europe

It is eleven meters under the asphalt. It doesn’t make noise, it doesn’t emit smoke and it doesn’t appear on the news. But while Zaragoza residents debate the electricity bill, under their feet there is a layer of underground water that remains at a stable 18 °C all year round – in the heat of the August heat wave or in the January frost – and that has been silently heating and cooling dozens of buildings in the city for almost three decades. The existence of this “natural radiator” hidden under the streets of Zaragoza has returned to the news this week with a double reason: the consolidation of the city as a European benchmark in urban geothermal exploitation, and the presentation of a pioneering method – developed and tested there – to intelligently manage this resource before success destroys it. In short. The team of the Advanced Hydrogeological and Geothermal Systems Group (SHGA) of the Geological and Mining Institute of Spain (IGME-CSIC) has presented the results of THERMAL, a new method of managing the urban aquifer that they have successfully tested in Zaragoza. The data is concrete: by better coordinating existing heat pumps – without drilling a single new well – more than 7,500 euros per year can be saved per installation and the emission of almost 15 tons of CO₂ can be avoided. As Cristina de Santiago Buey, geologist and researcher at IGME-CSIC, details, the Aragonese capital is already a reference. “What makes Zaragoza a benchmark is not only the magnitude of the use, but the way in which it has been managed collectively through a model based on scientific knowledge and institutional coordination,” explains the scientist. “This total vision guarantees that geothermal exploitation does not compromise either the sustainability of the aquifer or public health, and turns the municipality into a pioneering example of urban subsoil governance.” Why Zaragoza? The “mattress” of the Ebro. It is no coincidence that this happens here. Beneath the city lies what geologists call the aquifer “Ebro Alluvial: Zaragoza“: a mass of underground water between 20 and 30 meters thick, in direct connection with the riverbed, and with the water table about 11 meters deep. In simple terms, it is a cushion of water linked to the Ebro that acts as a natural thermostat. The geothermal key to that mattress is its temperature. While the outside air oscillates between 35 °C in the Aragonese summer and 2 °C on a Cerro day, the groundwater remains stable at around 18 °C throughout the year. That consistency is exactly what a geothermal heat pump needs to work at maximum efficiency. A giant refrigerator under the asphalt. To understand its mechanism, it is worth remembering how the home refrigerator works: it does not generate cold, it simply moves heat from the inside to the outside. The geothermal heat pump does the same, but on an urban scale and using the subsoil as a source or sink of energy. In winter, the system extracts water from the aquifer at 18 °C, “steals” part of that heat through an exchanger, and amplifies it to heat the building. Then, the water – now somewhat colder – is reinjected. In summer, the process is reversed: heat is extracted from the building and released to groundwater, which at 18°C ​​is much colder than the outside air. The advantage over aerothermal energy is substantial. Cristina de Santiago Buey illustrates it very clearly: if we want to keep a house at 22 °C and the outside air is at 5 °C in winter, an aerothermal pump has to overcome a large thermal jump of 17 degrees. “If instead of air we use the ground, which remains stable around 18 °C, the jump is much smaller and the pump works much more easily and efficiently,” details the expert. Less effort translates directly into less electricity consumed and a much lower bill. Three decades and sixty installations. The geothermal use of the Zaragoza aquifer was growing progressively for almost thirty years. The result: about 60 large installations, mostly in public buildings, with an installed power of about 110 thermal megawatts only for cooling – the approximate equivalent of the energy needed to air-condition more than 15,000 homes. Hospitals, university campuses, shopping centers and apartment blocks benefit from it. Highlights include the City Council’s Zero Emissions Building, which consumes 52% less energy than a conventional building, or the Saica paper mill, with a field of 12 holes integrated into its foundations. The managers of these properties agree: the peace of mind of not depending on the fluctuations of the electricity market to cool or heat huge surfaces compensates for any initial installation effort. Although there is a B side. With so many wells extracting and reinjecting water, facilities can interfere with each other. If the aquifer becomes excessively hot in the long term by returning too much hot water, it is no longer useful. The current challenge is not the lack of resources, but rather coordinating their use among dozens of actors. This is where the THERMAL method comes in. The system adjusts flow rates and temperatures so that no installation interferes with the others. The next step is already underway: incorporating artificial intelligence and machine learning to anticipate energy demand and climate changes in the subsoil, with the aim of exporting this model to other European cities. From Zaragoza to Mieres: an exportable model. To measure the milestone of Zaragoza, it is advisable to look at international references. Paris, thanks to the large Dogger aquifer, has an immense underground air conditioning network; and near Helsinki, in Vantaa, the world’s largest seasonal thermal storage system is being built, designed to store summer heat and release it in winter. In Spain, the other great example is Mieres (Asturias), where the Pozo Barredo – an abandoned and flooded coal mine – was converted into the largest geothermal network in the country. Today it heats a hospital, the university and hundreds of homes in a perfect example … Read more

A 20-year-old experiment with girls walking in pairs revealed one of society’s invisible glues

Between 2005 and 2006, a pair of Israeli researchers selected twenty-four young girls and had them walk in pairs. That was it. They did not explain anything else, nor did they ask them for anything extra: essay after essay, Zivotofsky and Hausdorff they recorded the girls while they walked together. It seems trivial, but beneath those trivialities there are surprising things. And “often, a distracted gaze does not perceive it, but synchronization between people walking together is quite common.” The researchers realized that, in half of the cases (many more if they were holding hands), the girls spontaneously coordinated their steps with whoever was walking next to them. The interesting thing is that, far from being a curiosity, it is a key element of who we are as a society. It is no coincidence that robots still they have not mastered it. Human beings synchronize. It is not just the work of Zivotofsky and Hausdorff on walking in pairs, nor the studies that they have been confirming. Cardiorespiratory synchronization is well documented in social contexts (couples touchingchoirs, conversations with friends or familyetc.). They’re just two examples from a field of research that, over the past 20 years, has tracked the prosocial effects of these kinds of things. Why do we do it? There are two large brain networks that seem to be involved in all this: the mentalization network (allows us to infer intentions, beliefs and other people’s mental states) and the mirror neuron system (which, as traditionally believedare the basis of empathy; and are co-activated during joint action tasks). But none of this answers the question that interests us: why do we do it? On an evolutionary level, I say. And although there is debate about it, researchers tend to think that the prosocial benefits of this synchronization help us live in society. After all, studies suggest that walking in sync with a stranger improves your impression of them, even without speaking. It is so effective that there is no lack of studies that analyze how this motor synchrony has been historically used as a tool for group cohesion. Also in contexts of aggression, war and dehumanization of foreign groups. Two walking together. It is surprising, in this context, that Homer already defined friendship as “two walking together”. Because it is exactly that. It is also a tool to break negative dynamics. It is not automatic, it is not something direct; but going for a walk, holding hands, is a way to connect that, lately, we are abandoning. It is true that, with these studies in hand, causality is complex to determine. One can never be sure if it is the synchronization that makes us ‘fit’ or the fact that we are compatible that makes synchronization easier. However, the impact of a world in which every time we interact and we touch each other less is yet to be known. Image | Richard Bell In Xataka | Robots have a problem that no one has solved in decades: they get lost. A Spanish engineer believes she has found the key

They are perfect if you are looking to save and cut a subscription

Spotify, HBO Max, and Apple TV are just three of the subscriptions I pay for religiously every month. The usual thing happens here: just one costs little, but when you start adding them up, the monthly expense hurts your pocket. For this reason, I have been thinking about cutting some subscriptions for a while, but it is difficult because, although it may seem like not, I use them all. So the solution is to look for a two-in-one subscription that allows me to remove at least one of them. This is somewhat complicated on streaming platforms, although not so much in tools that I use on a daily basis. I’ve had separate cloud storage and a VPN for a while now, but, Why not get a service that includes both? For this reason, there are three services that comply with this and have convinced me. Internxt The first option that includes both services is Internxt, a company of Spanish origin. It is a secure cloud storage service with end-to-end encryption, so not even the company itself can access your data. Besides, It is open sourceso anyone can audit it through GitHub, ensuring transparency. Its three plans include storage and VPN. The cheapest starts at 9.99 euros per month, although if we use the code ‘XATAKA’, the first month will cost only 1.57 euros. In exchange, we will have 1 TB of cloud storageencrypted VPN and, incidentally, antivirus. Internxt – One month trial The price could vary. We earn commission from these links NordVPN With NordVPN we go in the opposite direction: it is a VPN that includes cloud storage in some of its plans. It is one of the best VPNs currently available, offering a service that, in addition to being very secure, is also fast and with more than 9,400 servers spread around the world. Plus, with just one account, you can have VPN on up to 10 devices. In order to have cloud storage with NordVPN, we need to choose the ‘Full’ plan or the ‘Ultra’ plan. The first is the most economical and includes, in addition to 1 TB of cloud storageandpassword manager and protection against fraudulent calls. If we take their monthly plan, the price is 18.19 eurosalthough the most economical way in the long term is to choose their 24-month plan: that way, per month it will only cost us 4.79 euros. NordVPN Full Monthly Plan (2-year plan) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Proton Finally, we have Proton. It is another European service that has several different tools such as email, VPN or cloud storage, among others. We have the possibility of contracting some of these separately, but in this case the subscription that interests us is Proton Unlimited. Because? Because basically It is a service that encompasses everything. This subscription includes, in addition to a VPN (which is also considered one of the best), 500 GB of cloud storage, the possibility of having up to 15 encrypted email addresses, a password manager and even office tools to create and edit text documents or spreadsheets. Its price is 12.99 euros per month, although if we choose its annual subscription, the price drops to 9.99 euros per month. Proton Unlimited (one year) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Štefan ŠtefančíkInternxt, Proton, NordVPN In Xataka | Google Drive alternatives: the best cloud storage services for your files In Xataka | Best VPNs 2026: guide with the 17 best services to protect your online privacy

gases are the best sign to assess the microbiota

Intestinal transit has almost always been a taboo topic, surrounded by myths, home remedies and, above all, uncomfortable silences even before a medical consultation. However, what happens in our intestine is a very important indicator of the overall health of the body, and that is why science imposes different figures on what is considered “going to the bathroom well”, and has also redeemed gas. Which is normal. For years, the range of what was considered a “normal” bowel rhythm was enormously wide, ranging from three times a week to three times a day. However, an exhaustive study published in 2024 limited this window to much more exact figures. To do this, 1,400 healthy adults were analyzed and they saw that the ideal area in which we should move It is to make 1 to 2 bowel movements a day. But he went even further by correlating the number of bowel movements with the presence of constipation or not: 1-2 bowel movements a week is considered constipation. 3-6 bowel movements a week is considered to have a normal-low transit. 1-3 bowel movements a day is considered to have a normal-high transit. With more than 20 bowel movements a week we are talking about diarrhea. What it indicates. What is truly revealing is not just the number, but what happens in our body when we move away from it, since researchers discovered that constipation causes intestinal bacteria, running out of fiber to ferment, to begin fermenting proteins. This process generates microbial toxins in the blood, such as p-cresol sulfate and indoxyl sulfate, metabolites that have been shown to be directly associated with damage to the kidneys and worse functioning of the body in general in the long term. The gases. It is undoubtedly a great stigma and we think that if we do not have gas throughout the day, we must be happy, but the reality is very different, since if we want to go to the bathroom at least once a day, we must consume a good amount of fiber. And this is where the collateral “damage” most feared by many comes in: flatulence. A study published in 2023 specifically pointed out that having gas is, in the vast majority of cases, the unequivocal sign that we have a healthy microbiota working at full capacity. Beneficial bacteria from genera such as Bacteroids, Ruminococcus either Roseburia They feed on fiber that we cannot digest and the byproduct of that microbial feast is gas. But curiously, 99% of these gases do not have any type of odorbeing hydrogen or carbon dioxide, causing the remaining 1% to have a bad smell because it is composed of sulfur gases. A good microbiota. knowing we need fiber To achieve ideal transit and prevent toxins from reaching the blood, the challenge is to introduce it into the diet while minimizing discomfort. Current scientific guidelines establish a clear roadmap, marking how aim the intake of 25 grams of fiber in the case of women and 38 grams in men. But it is a mistake to go from 10 to 40 grams of fiber overnight, since intestinal microbiology experts recommend a gradual introduction of fiber, starting with changing just half a slice of white bread to whole wheat to give bacterial populations time to adapt. It can be a problem. Although gas is normal, chronic pain or paralyzing bloating is not, and for those for whom the increase in fiber translates into symptoms of this nature, it is necessary to go to a doctor’s office to have a study done with the aim of targeting a very specific diet that favors intestinal transit. Images | Sasun Bughdaryan In Xataka | “Eating mixed nuts helps your brain health”: What science knows about how a hazelnut affects your memory

The most ambitious US military project in space has a new owner: SpaceX

The United States Government has hired SpaceX to act as the backbone of its military telecommunications system. After several delays of an initial system, based on the participation of multiple companies and entities, it has now been decided to bet all data transport on Elon Musk’s request. Starshield satellites. Although the technical details have not been announced at the moment, this agreement between the Pentagon and SpaceX is possibly based mainly on the contracting of Starshield services, satellites with technology similar to that of Starlink, but adapted to military applications. The space company It already has hundreds of these satellites in low Earth orbit, some of them involved in actions such as attacks on Iran. A system made up of layers. The hiring of SpaceX, in which 2.29 billion dollars have been invested, is aimed at the development of the backbone. That is, the central layer of the data transport system used by the United States for military purposes. This system consists of more layers, in which more companies will intervene, which will be in charge, for example, of tracking. However, everything revolves around the axis constituted by Elon Musk’s satellites. The functions. With all these contracts, the United States intends to facilitate the tactical communications of the US Army thanks to access to broadband communication services worldwide. In addition, the aim is to work on the detection and tracking of missile launches and, in turn, connect sensors and shooters. In short, SpaceX must provide the backbone of a system composed of sensors that detect possible threats and a network that communicates these threats as quickly as possible to anti-missile systems and shooters so that they act accordingly. Other companies. While SpaceX will focus on data transportation and the cohesion of all actors involved in the United States military plan, other companies will be in charge of tracking. In recent years, the Space Development Agency hired for it to L3Harris Technologies, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Rocket Lab, all companies that have already begun developing satellites for this purpose. On the other hand, the last three, together with York Space Systems, they had been hired also for transportation purposes, similar to those that have finally been entrusted to SpaceX. At the moment it does not seem that the development of its own satellites has been cancelled, but the change in strategy, much more focused on SpaceX, is clear. Concerned legislators. Despite the intervention of other companies, legislators have expressed concern about the decision to put all the transportation and telecommunications eggs in Elon Musk’s basket. Given this situation, the spokesperson for the United States Space Force has assured who are already looking for a second contractor to build Space Data Network satellites. At the moment it is only SpaceX’s task, but they intend to increase competition. SpaceX’s duties. As they point out from Ars TechnicaElon Musk’s company is obliged to deliver a “prototype of fully operational capacity” for its telecommunications system before the end of 2027. With this, SpaceX diversifies its work, entering fully into the military field. Is this surprising? The truth is, not too much. Now all that remains is to see how it swims in these waters in which He had already made his first dives. Image | US Space Force photo by Gwendolyn Kurzen/Diego González (Unsplash) In Xataka | Once again, Ukraine has opened a missile launched by Russia. Once again, surprising manufacturers have been found

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.