In his efforts to cut and fire workers in the US, Elon Musk has gone one step further: Italy

In February an unprecedented event occurred in the United States. The government efficiency department (Doge) led by Elon Musk in the Trump administration, the same person in charge of carry out those “cuts” that he has staged with the chainsier that Milei gave him, fired 350 officials of the energy department. He had gone his hand so much that he had to rectify to recover specialists in the assembly of nuclear eyelets. The chainsaw Musk has just transferred borders, but he has met Italy. The controversy in Aviano. It is public and notorious. Elon Musk, known today for his aggressive management and reduction of cost management, has just generated A new international controversy After imposing its productivity control system at the American Avian Air Base, in northern Italy. An email Aimed at Italian employees The base required that they report five weekly achievements, under threat of dismissal if they did not. This type of measure, already implemented in the United States, has collided fully with the Italian labor system, which guarantees strong protections and rights to its workers. The incident has caused an immediate reaction of the unions, the Italian government and public opinion, triggering a confrontation between the business model of Musk and the labor laws of the European nation. Musk mail and surprise. The message in question was sent to Aviano Base Employees that work in areas such as restoration, maintenance and logistics, essential services for the functioning of US military facilities in Italy. Although the order was supposed to be aimed at Washington employees, the mail Italian workers were forwardedwhich generated confusion and alarm. As we said, in Italy the right to work It is constitutionally protected And contracts offer some job stability, so Musk’s demand has been seen as an unacceptable interference. I told New York Times Roberto del Savio, union representative of the employees of the base, his immediate rejection of the directive: “We are in Italy. Here are precise rules, and thank God for it. ” Not just that. The rejection was not limited only to the workers of Aviano. In total, around 4,000 Italian civil employees They work in US bases in the country, serving 15,000 American soldiers and guaranteeing the operation of facilities that operate as small American peoples on European soil. @alberico_dip Anch was not vero io gli risponderei così ♬ Original Suone – 😂 Alberico di Pasquale 😂 The Italian labor system. The European country, as we said, has one of the most protected labor systems in Europe. Of course, with his “Peros”, but the laws They guarantee job stabilityunionization and rights that are difficult to modify, especially in the public sector. Unlike the United States, where companies can fire employees with relative ease, in Italy the dismissals are more complicated and require solid legal justifications. In this regard, Pierpaolo Bombardieri explainedgeneral secretary of the UIL union, which Musk’s mail is “unacceptable and aberrant.” In fact and given the outrage generated, the unions sent letters to the Italian government and the United States embassy demanding clarifications about whether these types of measures could affect Italian workers of the US bases in the country. What do the bases say. Current norms establish that Italian civilian employees are only obliged to respond to instructions if they come directly from the United States government, not if they are tested emails. However, it is not clear if the Department of Defense plans to extend these productivity control practices to local workers. Reactions in Italy. The episode has not only generated indignation in the unions, but also became A mockery theme In the nation. The rigidity of the Italian labor system is seen by some as a guarantee of stability, but by others as an obstacle to modernization. For example, right -wing journalist and commentator Nicola Porro wrote on his blog: “Italy would also need Musk’s ax.” In social networks, a video of the content creator was popularized Alberico di Pasqualewho simulated how an Italian worker would respond to Musk’s mail. Of course, The video went viral Quickly, humorously reflecting many Italians about their work culture and the clash with the vision of extreme productivity of Musk. Musk, Trump and uncertainty. Beyond the punctual controversy in Aviano, the incident occurs in a context of uncertainty about the commitment of the United States with its military bases in Europe. Trump has insisted that European countries They must assume greater costs In his own defense, which has generated speculation about possible cuts in military bases such as Aviano. In fact, in parallel to the controversy, the US government froze credit cards Used by Italian employees of Aviano to buy equipment and stopped new hiring. Decisions that have increased concern among workers, who fear that the pressure to reduce costs will end up affecting their jobs. Hence, the words of Emilio Fargnoli, union representative, seem to be the voice of the majority: “Musk can do what he wants in the United States. If there are happy with that, perfect. But here, no. “ Image | Nathan Hughes, Gage Skidmore In Xataka | Elon Musk fired hundreds of employees and now he has to hire them again: they were experts in nuclear weapons In Xataka | 131 Microsoft Excel templates to organize everything

65% of workers believe they charge little for their work

With the debate about the Up of the minimum interprofessional salary Still hot, a recent study reveals that most employees in Spain feel inframing with respect to Your professional responsibilities. According to The data collected In the ‘Labor Market Guide 2025’ published by Hays, that discontent has grown with respect to 2023, despite the fact that SMI increases have improved the salary conditions of many employees. The problem is that average salaries. A ADECCO report It ensures that real average salaries in Spain, adjusted by inflation, have remained stagnant during the last thirty years. Dissatisfied employees. The study of the Human Resources consultant, prepared on a base of 5,600 companies and professionals in Spain, reveals that the Salary dissatisfaction It is still an important problem in the Spanish labor market. 65% of professionals feel that their salary does not correspond to the work they do. It is the same figure that was recorded in 2023, but represents a worsening of 5% compared to 2024, and 9% compared to 2021. Only 46% say they are satisfied with their salary (although I can consider it insufficient for their responsibilities). One of the factors that contribute the most to employees in their current salary is the complement of time flexibility associated with their position. Flexibility and teleworking as accessories. 54% of respondents prioritize time flexibility above other benefits, such as additional holidays or medical insurance with more coverage. In addition to flexibility, 63% of respondents highlight the good work environment as complementary factors to salary. 42% place teleworking as one of the important accessories to the salary. So much so that they would even renounce the 25% of your salary By teleworking. Christopher Dottie, regional general director of Hays in southern Europe, stood out in his report The importance of teleworking For talent retention “with the reduction of the maximum working day of 40 to 37.5 hours, whose application is still delayed, and the impulse of teleworking is put in the hands of professionals the opportunity to demonstrate their value in terms of production , being free to choose where and how to work. With one foot on the street. Salary dissatisfaction is one of the main arguments To change jobs. In 2025, the intention of changing jobs is stated for the dissatisfaction of not obtaining adequate salary or working conditions. 69% of respondents claim to find themselves in an active search situation of a job. This data significantly improves with respect to 2024 that registered 70% of employees willing to leave your job For one with better conditions. However, it remains above 63% that was recorded in 2023. SALARIAL ASCOME EXPECTATION. Despite the situation of salary dissatisfaction that portray Hays’s data, the salary perspectives By 2025 that draws this report are optimistic. 48% of the professionals interviewed believe that their annual salary will increase above 5%, while 17% think it will do it between 2.5 and 4.9%. Less optimistic are the companies that have participated, 27% bet on rank increases of 2.5% and 4.9%, followed by which, with 26%, they think they will remain or, at most, they will increase below 2.4% (24%). Source: “Labor Market Guide 2025”. Hays Dottie says that 2024 has been a decisive year in the fight against job precariousness, but has also meant an additional economic effort for companies. “With the recent increase in the minimum interprofessional salary (SMI) and the resolutions of the Labor Reform of 2021, there is talk of a certain improvement of labor precariousness. Although these measures positively impact the well -being of many professionals, they at the same time important important Challenges for Spanish business fabric, which must be adjusted in its cost structures. “ In Xataka | Ask for a salary increase is a negotiation art: as in any battle, you have to be prepared with a strategy Image | Unspash (Jakub żerdzicki, Cemrecan Yurtman)

Los Angeles approves financial aid for workers affected by fires

Unanimously, Los Angeles City Council members approved a $25,000 relief fund this Tuesday for residents of the northeast San Fernando Valley who lost their income as a result of the fires that devastated the region since January 7. The authorization of the resources will allow providing economic relief to pool cleaners, gardeners, personal chefs, caretakers, drivers and other service workers who were left without the possibility of receiving income due to the devastation. The author of the motion, Councilwoman Imelda Padilla, recommended financial assistance specifically for the residents of District Six in her care (CD6), which spans areas of Van Nuys, Panorama City, Arleta and North Hills, among other neighborhoods. Keep reading: Risk in burned areas of Los Angeles due to upcoming rains This motion was supported by Councilor Mónica Rodríguez. The Los Angeles City Council authorized aid for workers affected by the fires.Credit: Damian Dovarganes | AP “A stark reminder that our local economy is interconnected, it means that a disaster in one part of the city still affects the most vulnerable in others“said Councilor Padilla in her motion. Keep reading: Fire victims in Los Angeles return home to find a desolate panorama “Not supporting this critical sector can lead to CD6 residents unable to pay expenses that can lead to homelessness, evictions or food insecurity“added the councilor. For this purpose, city ​​to partner with Initiating Change in Our Neighborhoods Community Development Corporationwhich is also recognized as ICON CDC, which operates the Los Angeles Business Source Centers of the North and South Valley regions. Keep reading: Second day of strong winds in Southern California The organization has operated since 2002 and offers free services primarily to entrepreneurs and small business owners with low and moderate income. Keep reading:· Firefighters put out two new fires that broke out this Monday in Los Angeles· Fake firefighters arrested in Los Angeles fire zone· Who will pay for fire damage?

Trump orders federal workers back to office or threatens layoffs

In one of his first actions as president of the United States, Donald Trump issued an executive order ending remote work for all federal employees, a measure aimed at reducing the federal workforce through attrition. The White House directed all US government departments and agencies in the executive branch to end remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work full time. Department heads may exempt some workers from this requirement, but in very specific cases. The executive order was one of multiple directives aimed at the 2.3 million-person federal workforce that, along with the return-to-the-office mandate, includes a hiring freeze, revamped hiring rules and other measures to make it more easy to fire high-level career employees. The White House said the measures were necessary to limit what Trump and his supporters consider a “deep state” that fought against his actions during the president’s first term. “There have been numerous well-documented cases of career federal officials resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership.”states one of the executive orders signed by the president on Monday night “Therefore, the principles of good administration require that measures be taken to restore accountability to career officials,” he continues. According to the Office of Management and Budget, about 1.1 million federal civilian employees, that is, 46% of the civilian workforce, were eligible for some form of teleworking. Of those, approximately 228,000 workers, or 10% of the total workforce, had fully remote positions with no obligation to go to an office. Union reaction The return-to-office directive is expected to face a fight from federal unions, some of which have remote work written into their contracts. A union representing government workers criticized the mandate as representing a return to the patronage system thatthat oversaw the federal workforce until the end of the 19th century. “Every American has a stake in ensuring that federal employees remain free to carry out the mission of the agencies that employ them without fear of political interference,” Everett Kelly, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement. (AFGE), which represents 800,000 workers in the federal government and the government of the District of Columbia. Kelly, whose union represents employees of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies, also called Trump’s directives “a blatant attempt to corrupt the government.” federal law by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.” The National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit against the president’s “Schedule F” executive order, a directive that makes it easier for the Trump administration to fire career government employees. Trump’s order is “contrary to the intent of Congress,” according to the complaint filed Monday night in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Keep reading: • Vivek Ramaswamy gives up his mission to try to save the government millions of dollars• Trump sets a date for charging 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada• Trump’s insistence on increasing defense spending to 5% worries NATO

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.