In ‘Farmtok’, agriculture takes the spotlight. What will happen if TikTok disappears?

BUCYRUS, Ohio, USA — Zoe Kent hopes people will lighten up a little to hear her talk about farming on the internet. In one of his latest videos, he compares pesticide application to dry shampoo. “Farming is for girls,” he jokes. On Instagram and TikTok, under the username “farmwithzoe,” Kent films herself putting on boots to load corn into the bed of a huge truck, posts memes about the price of grain, and documents almost everything about life on the farm, from how He gets rocks stuck in his equipment until he eats lunch on long days working on a combine. Now, the future of TikTok — and “Farmtok,” as some creators call the agriculture-related influencer ecosystem — has become more uncertain due to a ban the U.S. government briefly implemented on TikTok over the weekend. The new Trump administration rescinded that ban, at least for now, but farmers are keenly aware that things could change, and with them, the ways they share farm life with the rest of the world. But most say they will continue to adapt to what the platforms throw at them. “It’s like building your business on rented land,” Kent said. “It’s not guaranteed to stay there.” Even before the uncertain threat to TikTok’s future, agricultural creators had to deal with the evolution of social media. As algorithms changed, they faced greater challenges communicating with an audience many see as increasingly disconnected from agriculture. But most say they will continue to adapt to what the platforms throw at them. Some producers make extra money by building an audience on TikTok or Instagram. Others use social media to advertise to local customers, such as restaurants or farmers markets. Perhaps most importantly, they want to continue building community with other farmers in the face of industry challenges such as the profession’s impact on mental health, economic pressure and climate change. Several farmers said the disconnect has grown over the years as social media algorithms have changed. “I know for a fact that our social media reach is way down now,” said Beth Satterwhite, who has been posting on Instagram about her small organic vegetable farm in McMinnville, Oregon, for more than a decade. “The stories of people working in agriculture are a little less interesting for the consumer, I don’t know if it’s really less interesting or just less visible,” he said. Neil Denton, who grows corn, soybeans, wheat and rye in Barlow, Kentucky, shared a similar sentiment. Consider that many of his more than 80,000 followers on Instagram and 33,000 on TikTok are other producers, not members of the public. He finds that “disappointing” and worries about how much people know about the food that ends up on their plates. But he thinks there’s a silver lining: “Farming is a lonely occupation because you’re not around a lot of co-workers,” Denton said. “I think some farmers use social media as an outlet… to be able to express yourself and feel like you’re not alone.” Within the farming community, it can also be helpful to learn from other farmers, many producers said. Megan Dwyer, who grows corn and soybeans and raises beef cattle in northwest Illinois, uses social media, especially X and Facebook, to gauge what’s important to other farmers. “It’s a great source of information, especially quick information,” he said. However, all that quick information comes at a price. Satterwhite described a “soup of language” around agriculture, saying it could be difficult for an outsider to say which agricultural practices are legitimately better for the climate or the environment. “I see a lot of greenwashing,” Satterwhite said, referring to the practice of falsely portraying a product or practice as green in order to market it to an environmentally conscious public. “There is definitely a lot of misinformation out there,” Kent added. “I try to filter out who has genuine questions versus who already has a stance and isn’t willing to listen to me.” That’s something many ag influencers agree on: that they still want a place to have a conversation. As Dwyer said, “You never know who you are influencing there or what can happen.”

Kylie Jenner Calls Her Shoes ‘Toe F——‘ In Hilarious TikTok

NEWS Source: @kyliejenner/TikTok Kylie Jenner has a comical name for her shoes. Aug. 30 2024, Published 11:10 am ET Only Kylie Jenner can take any term and make it into a fashion statement — because she’s Kylie Jenner! On Thursday, August 30, the reality star took to TikTok with a video previously saved to her “drafts” on the app, as she did an outfit check in the mirror before a fun night with her pals. Article continues below advertisement Source: @kyliejenner/TikTok The Kylie Cosmetics founder shared a video of her outfit to TikTok on Thursday, August 29. Article continues below advertisement “I’m having friends over and we’re gonna go see Blink Twice,” Jenner began in the clip, referencing Zoe Kravitz new film starring her fiancé, Channing Tatum. The Kylie Cosmetics founder was briefly distracted by her daughter, Stormy6, who she shares with her ex Travis Scottin addition to their son, Air2. Article continues below advertisement Source: @kyliejenner/TikTok In the video, Kylie Jenner mentioned she was going to watch ‘Blink Twice’ with some friends. Article continues below advertisement “Why are you looking at me like that? Stormi’s looking at me,” Jenner quipped while glancing over at her little girl, who was off camera. Resuming her video, Jenner continued, “This is my ‘fit of the night. I put this together in two seconds,” proceeding to show off her “new favorite pants,” which looked like black low-rise trousers, and a questionable pair of ballet flat-styled shoes. Article continues below advertisement Source: @kyliejenner/TikTok Kylie Jenner hilariously referred to her shoes as ‘toe f——.’ Article continues below advertisement “I call these the toe f——,” the 27-year-old — who was dressed in all black — admittedly comedically before giving a close-up of the footwear featuring a split between her big toe and the rest . In the comments section of the post, some fans were cracking up over Jenner’s name for her shoes, with others gushing over how much they loved seeing Blink Twice in theaters. Article continues below advertisement Source: @kyliejenner/TikTok MORE ON: Kylie Jenner Want OK! every day? Sign up here! Article continues below advertisement “No one talking about the toe fkers (sic). ICONIC 😂,” one person pointed out, as another admitted, “the name of the shoe killed me😂✨.” “The shoe name 🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭,” a third fan reacted, while another said: “The toe what😭. Love u.” Article continues below advertisement Never miss a story — sign up for the OK! newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what OK! has to offer. It’s gossip too good to wait for! Article continues below advertisement A fifth admirer confessed: “It feels like I’m in her private story 😭.” Jenner’s post comes just a couple days after she uploaded a video of the makeup mogul and her best friend Stassie Karanikolaou jamming out to Sabrina Carpenter‘s new song “Taste” while out for one of their frequently documented car rides. Article continues below advertisement Source: @kyliejenner/TikTok Kylie Jenner and her best friend Stassie Karanikolaou love vlogging their car rides. Article continues below advertisement The fan-favorite BFF duo playfully lip-synced along to the track — which is rumored to be about Carpenter’s love triangle with Shawn Mendes and Camila Cabello. Jenner and Karanikolaou love hanging out together in their luxury vehicles, as they’ve shared multiple vlogs to social media of the pair going through the In-N-Out Burger drive-thru and heading to one of their favorite desert places Crumbl Cookies. Article continues below advertisement Last month, Jenner’s makeup brand even teamed up with Crumbl Cookie to release an exclusive limited edition set of Kylie Cosmetics cookies. The special edition treats were only available for one day at the West Hollywood Crumbl Cookies location, though fans begged for more to be sold across the country.

Wisconsin man accused of setting fire to lawmaker’s office over TikTok ban

MADISON, Wisconsin, USA — A Wisconsin man who allegedly told police he tried to set fire to a lawmaker’s office because he was upset with the federal ban on the social media platform TikTok was charged Wednesday with multiple counts, including one of arson. Fond du Lac County District Attorney Eric Toney filed a complaint against 19-year-old Caiden Stachowicz, charging him with felony arson, making terrorist threats, attempted robbery and criminal damage. property. If convicted of all charges, he would face a sentence of more than 50 years in prison. Stachowicz, a native of Menasha City, was scheduled to make his first court appearance Wednesday morning. Online court records indicated Judge Tricia Walker set cash bail for him at $500,000 and ordered him to have no contact with Republican U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman or his staff. He was also prohibited from possessing any dangerous weapons or materials to start a fire. Records showed Stachowicz appeared via video call from jail. His lawyer could not be contacted at this time. According to the complaint, a police officer responded to a fire outside Grothman’s office in Fond du Lac around 1 a.m. Sunday and saw Stachowicz standing near the site. The officer said that while he was working to put out the flames with his fire extinguisher, Stachowicz told him he started the fire because he doesn’t like Grothman. The officer handcuffed Stachowicz and took him to the police department. Firefighters and police quickly extinguished the fire, limiting the damage. During an interview at the police department, Stachowicz told the officer that he bought gasoline and matches to start a fire in Grothman’s office, according to the complaint. He said he tried to get into the office so he could start the fire inside, but he couldn’t break the window. He then poured the gasoline into an electrical box at the back of the building and around the front of the building, lit a match and watched it burn, the complaint adds. He noted that he wanted to burn the building because the US government was shutting down TikTok and Grothman voted “in favor” of banning the social network, according to the complaint. Grothman voted in favor of a bill in April last year that forced TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance, to sell its US operation by Sunday. Stachowicz said he believed the closure violated his constitutional rights. He added that he had participated in peaceful protests in the past, but no longer believes peace is an option, the complaint states. “Caiden said it was a government building and he wanted to cause a disruption and make a point by starting the fire in the building,” according to the complaint. “Caiden commented that he wished the entire building had burned down.” When asked if he expected people to be inside the building, he said no and that he didn’t want to hurt anyone, and he didn’t want to hurt Grothman either. TikTok went down in the US on Saturday afternoon, but the platform was back up and running hours later after then-President-elect Donald Trump said he would try to give ByteDance more time to find a buyer. Trump signed an executive order Monday after taking office instructing the U.S. attorney general not to implement the ban for 75 days. When asked to comment on the charges, Grothman spokeswoman Noelle Young responded by saying Grothman would call The Associated Press directly. However, the lawmaker had not contacted the AP as of Wednesday afternoon.

In the midst of the countdown to its disappearance, a buyer has become interested in TikTok: MrBeast

The youtuber MrBeastthe YouTuber with the most subscribers in the world and whose figure has completely transcended the figure of the traditional YouTuber, has presented a formal offer to buy TikTok together with a group of institutional investors. He has told it himself. On TikTokclear. Why is it important. TikTok must find a non-Chinese buyer in 75 days, or it will be permanently banned in the United States, where it has 170 million users. The context. The social network was briefly turned off on Saturday in the United States following a court order, but was back up and running when President Trump signed a decree giving 75 days of margin for its sale. The investment group that is trying to take over the social network, according to Guardian, is led by Jesse Tinsley, CEO of Employer.com. It also has the support of Brad Bondi, brother of Pam Bondi, the next US attorney general. In figures. The estimated value of TikTok in the US is between 40,000 and 50,000 million dollars. However, the real assessment is quite complex, since the recommendation algorithm It is considered the heart and most valuable asset of the platform. Trump has publicly valued TikTok at “between zero and one trillion dollars” if it obtains permission to operate in the US under 50% US ownership. A potential figure that multiplies by twenty the estimates of market analysts. The competition. Other potential buyers mentioned cnn are: Elon Muskwhich is holding talks with Chinese officials. A consortium led by Kevin O’Leary from “Shark Tank.” The billionaire Frank McCourt. Technology giants like Amazon and Oracle. Go deeper. The Chinese government has expressed its refusal to sell the TikTok algorithm, considered the platform’s main asset. This greatly complicates any purchase operation. The MrBeast group’s offer promises to maintain TikTok’s current operations and guarantee the continuity of the service for its American users, which overcomes the great obstacle of the algorithm and leaves it in a good position compared to the rest. Featured image | MrBeast In Xataka | I have tried RedNote: this is the “Chinese Instagram” to which exiles are leaving after the closure of TikTok

Meta is paying content creators up to $50,000 a month to post more on Instagram and Facebook

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is implementing a Aggressive strategy to attract top TikTok content creators. According to recent reports, the company is offering payments of up to $50,000 per month to those who commit to actively publishing on its platforms. This movement seeks to consolidate Instagram and Facebook as attractive destinations for creators and their followers. The initiative arises in the middle of a fierce competition in the social media marketwhere platforms fight to capture users’ attention through exclusive, high-quality content. Meta, aware of the popularity of TikTok, seeks to attract the most influential creators of this platform to strengthen its offer and gain ground in a highly competitive sector. The context of uncertainty for TikTok Meta’s offer is developed in a complicated scenario for TikTokespecially in the United States, where the platform faces political and regulatory pressures that could put its operation at risk. Joe Biden’s administration passed a law forcing ByteDance, its parent company, to sell US operations from TikTok by January 19, 2025 or face an outright ban. This panorama has generated concern among content creators, who have begun to look for alternatives to ensure the continuity of their work. The uncertainty is also motivating many users to explore options on other platforms. In addition to Meta, other apps like Lemon8, Clapper, and Fanbase have emerged as potential havens for creators who want to diversify their channels and avoid relying exclusively on TikTok. However, Meta stands out for its ability to offer a massive user base, advanced tools, and now, substantial financial incentives. Meta seeks to lead with an aggressive strategy By offering up to $50,000 per month, Meta not only aims to attract creators, but also position itself as a reliable and stable option in the social media market. This approach aims to capitalize on the possible weakness of TikTok and strengthen the presence of Instagram and Facebook as competitive platforms. For creators, these types of incentives represent a unique monetization opportunity, especially in an environment where the rules for generating income on social networks can change rapidly. However, Meta’s strategy faces challenges, such as the need to ensure that creators can maintain and expand their audiences, as well as offering them tools that make it easier to engage with and monetize their content. With this maneuver, Meta is not only trying to gain ground against TikTok, but also position itself as the undisputed leader in the digital ecosystemattracting both creators and their followers with a comprehensive offer that combines visibility, stability and financial rewards. Keep reading: – “No one should go through this”: Mark Zuckerberg apologizes to families of children who have suffered harm due to social networks– TikTok Ban in US: Do VPNs Work to Maintain Access?– TikTok loses legal battle against law that seeks to prevent its operation in the US

CapCut closes in the United States after banning TikTok

This Sunday, January 19, marked a before and after in the American digital landscape. With the entry into force of a law that bans TikTok and? It has also affected the short video application, CapCut. Since hours before this Sunday, thousands of users encountered an unexpected message when trying to access their accounts in both applications: “Service not available.” This measure, endorsed by the Supreme Court, establishes the separation of these platforms from their parent company, ByteDance, as the only alternative to operate in the country. The veto expands: from TikTok to CapCut Although the initial focus of the legislation was on TikTok, its impact extended to CapCut. This had been launched in the United States in 2020 and over time gained millions of followers thanks to its integration with TikTok, allowing users to edit content and participate in viral trends with ease. The app offered an accessible experience on both mobile and desktop devices, consolidating itself as an essential tool for content creators. However, as of last Saturday night, January 18, Users in the United States began receiving the following message when trying to open CapCut: “Sorry, CapCut is not available at this time. A law has been passed banning CapCut in the United States. Unfortunately, that means you can’t use CapCut for now.” In a statement published on the social network X (Twitter) the same day, the CapCut team thanked users for their support and provided a contact email for those who wish to resolve problems related to their accounts. “We will do everything possible to resolve your request,” the company said. An uncertain future for TikTok and its users The TikTok ban affects millions of users and content creators in the US, as until now it had been a vibrant space for them. Shou Zi Chew, CEO of TikTok, expressed his gratitude to the community and reaffirmed his commitment to keeping the platform operational. “We will do everything in our power to ensure TikTok remains a rich and vibrant space. There is more to come,” he declared. Thank you for your support for CapCut. Please contact us at capcut.support@bytedance.com if your account becomes unavailable due to the ban. Our customer service team will reply as soon as possible, and will continue providing support after January 19. We will do our best to… — CapCut (@capcutapp) January 19, 2025 President Joe Biden, who will hand over to Donald Trump on January 20, He left the future of these applications in the hands of his successorwho, for his part, indicated in an interview with NBC News that he was considering granting a 90-day extension for TikTok, although he did not guarantee that this measure would also include CapCut. “The 90-day extension is something that will probably be done, because it is appropriate. We have to analyze it carefully. “It is a very important situation,” said the US president a few days ago. Reactions and consequences The ban of TikTok and CapCut in the United States marks a historic precedent as it is the first time that the federal government blocks digital applications at the national level. Although some see this measure as a defense of national security, others consider that it limits the digital freedom of users. Keep reading:

Supreme Court upholds law that bans TikTok in the US unless it changes ownership. How will it be applied?

Today, the US Supreme Court unanimously confirmed the federal law that bans the social network TikTok starting next Sunday, January 19, unless it is sold by its parent company based in China.. The measure maintains that the risk to national security raised by its ties to China outweighs concerns about limiting the freedom of expression of the application and its 170 million users in the United States. The decision came in the context of a unusual political upheaval by President-elect Donald Trump – who promised he could negotiate a solution – and the outgoing administration of Joe Biden, who has indicated that he will not apply the law starting Sunday, his last full day in office. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre issued a statement saying that “TikTok should continue to be available to Americans,” but that national security issues should be addressed. “Given the mere fact that it is time, this administration recognizes that actions to implement the law must simply fall to the next administration, which takes office on Monday,” he added. How does this affect current users? The bipartisan law requires that ByteDance, owner of TikTok based in China, will divest the company on Sunday, a day before Trump takes office. If no sales occur, the platform used by millions of Americans will theoretically be banned. A sale does not seem imminent And while experts have said the app won’t disappear from existing users’ phones once the law goes into effect on Jan. 19, new users won’t be able to download it and updates won’t be available. That will eventually render the app inoperative, said the Department of Justice In court documents, he highlighted Associated Press. In a rapidly changing situation, It is unclear what will happen on Sunday with TikTok in the United States, as there are signs that Trump could try to keep the app available. The Biden administration has also signaled that it will not take any enforcement action on Sunday. The Justice Department had raised two key issues in defending the ban: that the Chinese government could exercise control over content that users see to influence public opinion, and that could collect sensitive data over millions of American users. In today’s ruling, the court acknowledged that national security reasons affected its analysis of whether there was a violation of freedom of expression under the First Amendment of the Constitutionand the judges focused on the issue of data collection. The high court concluded that the reasons for enacting the law are “decidedly content-agnostic” and have nothing to do with restricting certain speech. “TikTok’s scale and its susceptibility to control by foreign adversaries, coupled with the vast swaths of sensitive data the platform collects, justify differential treatment to address the government’s national security concerns,” the supreme ruling said. “The challenged provisions promote an important governmental interest unrelated to the suppression of free speech and do not substantially burden free speech more than is necessary to promote that interest,” the court added. “The anti-TikTok sentiment that led Congress to pass the law, driven by concerns about the level of control the Chinese government has over the company, has quickly dissipated in some quarters,” he said. NBC News.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.